February 1790 1-10
DIE Martis, 2o Februarii 1790.
Domini tam Spirituales quam Temporales præsentes
fuerunt:
|
Epus. Bangor.
Epus. Carliol.
Epus. Glocestr. |
Ds. Thurlow, Cancellarius.
Dux Leeds.
Viscount Sydney. |
Ds. Cathcart.
Ds. Amherst.
Ds. Hawkesbury. |
PRAYERS.
Thanks to Bp. Carlisle for his Sermon.
Ordered, That the Thanks of this House be and are
hereby given to the Lord Bishop of Carlisle, for the Sermon by him preached before this House on Saturday last,
in the Abbey Church, Westminster; and he is hereby
desired to cause the same to be forthwith printed and
published.
Corn, Papers respecting, delivered.
The Duke of Leeds (by His Majesty's Command) laid
before the House,
No. 1. "Copy of His Majesty's Order in Council
prohibiting the Exportation of Wheat, Wheat Flour,
Rye, Rye Meal, Barley, Barley Meal, Malt, Bread,
Biscuit, Oats, Oat Meal, and Beans, until further
Order; and allowing the Importation of certain Articles of Foreign Grain, upon the Low Duties, dated
23d December 1789."
2. "Copy, Order in Council, for allowing the Reexportation of Foreign Corn and Grain, Flour and
Meal, which is or shall be warehoused; and also the
Exportation of Foreign and British Corn, Grain, &c.
entered for Exportation before the issuing or Receipt
of His Majesty's Order in Council of the 23d of December 1789, under the Regulations and Restrictions
therein mentioned, &c.; dated 2d January 1790."
3. "Copy, Order in Council, for allowing the Exportation of Malt, declared or made for Exportation on or
before the 28th of December 1789; dated 8th January
1790;" together with a List thereof; which being
read by the Clerk:
Ordered, That the said Copies do lie on the Table.
The Duke of Leeds also (by His Majesty's Command)
laid before the House,
No. 1. "Copy, Order of His Majesty in Council, allowing an additional Quantity of Grain and Flour, not
exceeding 750 Quarters, to be exported from the Port
of Southampton to the Island of Jersey, for the Use of
the Inhabitants, and of His Majesty's Troops stationed
there, up to the 25th of December 1789; dated 11th
November 1789."
2. "Copy Order of His Majesty in Council, allowing an additional Quantity of 300 Sacks of Flour to
be exported from the Port of Sonthampton to the Island
of Guernsey, for the Use of the Inhabitants, and of His
Majesty's Troops stationed there, up to the 25th of
December 1789; dated 18th November 1789;" together with a List thereof; which being read by the Clerk:
Ordered, That the said Copies do lie on the Table.
The Duke of Leeds also (by His Majesty's Command)
laid before the House,
"An Account of the Average Prices of Corn and Grain
in London, Counties Inland, Counties on the Coast,
and North and South Wales, for 10 Weeks, ended 9th
January 1790, as ascertained in pursuance of the
Statute of the 10th Geo. 3d. Chap. 39."
And the Title thereof being read by the Clerk:
Ordered, That the said Account do lie on the Table.
Rybot for a Divorce Bill:
Upon reading the Petition of Francis Thomas Rybot,
of Cheapside, London, praying Leave to bring in a Bill
to dissolve his Marriage with Alicia Fowler his now Wife,
and to enable him to marry again, and for other Purposes therein mentioned:
It is Ordered, That Leave be given to bring in a
Bill according to the Prayer of the said Petition.
Bill presented.
Accordingly, the Lord Cathcart presented to the House
a Bill, intituled, "An Act to dissolve the Marriage of
Francis Thomas Rybot with Alicia Fowler his now
Wife, and to enable him to marry again, and for other
Purposes therein mentioned."
The said Bill was read the First Time.
Ordered, That the said Bill be read a Second Time
on Wednesday the 17th Day of this Instant February, and
that Notice thereof be affixed on the Doors of this House;
and the Lords summoned; and that the said Francis
Thomas Rybot may be heard by his Counsel at the said
Second Reading, to make out the Truth of the Allegations of the Bill, and that the said Alicia Fowler may
have a Copy of the Bill, and that Notice be given her
of the said Second Reading, and that she be at Liberty to
be heard by her Counsel, what she may have to offer
against the said Bill at the same Time.
E. Abergavenny's Petition referred to Judges.
Upon reading the Petition of the Right Honourable
Henry Nevill Earl of Abergavenny, praying Leave to bring
in a Bill for the Purposes in the said Petition mentioned:
It is Ordered, That the Consideration of the said Petition be and is hereby referred to Mr. Baron Hotham
and Mr. Justice Wilson, who are forthwith to summon all
Parties concerned in the Bill, and after hearing them, are
to report to the House the State of the Case, with their
Opinion thereupon, under their Hands; and whether all
Parties, who may be concerned in the Consequences of
the Bill, have signed the Petition; and also that the
Judges, having perused the Bill, do sign the same.
Crossley against Sir R. Arkwright:
Upon reading the Petition of George Crossley, Plaintiff
in a Writ of Error depending in this House, wherein Sir
Richard Arkwright is Defendant; setting forth, "That
the Petitioner brought a Writ of Error returnable before
their Lordships, which was brought up into this House
on the 23d Day of July last, together with the Record
thereof, whereupon the Petitioner assigned certain
Matters for Error, to which Errors the said Defendant
rejoined, and the same now stands appointed for hearing; that the Petitioner is advised to withdraw his said
Assignment of Errors, and doth not intend further to
prosecute his said Writ;" and therefore praying
their Lordships, "That he may be at Liberty to withdraw his said Assignment of Errors, and that the
said Writ of Error may be Non-pros'd with such Costs,
as their Lordships shall please to direct, the Agent for
the said Defendant having signed the said Petition as
consenting thereto:"
Writ of Error non-pros'd with Costs.
It is Ordered, That the Petitioner be at Liberty to
withdraw his said Assignment of Errors, as desired; and
that the Defendant in Error do forthwith enter a Nonpros on the said Writ of Error, as desired; and that the
Record be remitted to the Court of King's Bench, to the
End Execution may be had upon the Judgement given by
that Court, as if no such Writ of Error had been brought
into this House; and further, that the Plaintiff in Error
do pay or cause to be paid to the Defendant in Error, the
Sum of Forty Pounds for his Costs, by Reason of the
Delay of the Execution of the said Judgement.
Mackreth against Fox et al.
Upon reading the Petition and Appeal of Robert Mackreth; complaining of a Decree of the Master of the
Rolls of the 19th of July 1786, and also of a Decree of
the Court of Chancery of the 11th of December 1788,
affirming the said Decree made in Two certain Causes, in
the First of which James Fox was Plaintiff, and Robert
Mackreth, John Dawes, and John Baynes Garforth were
Defendants, and in the last William Morton Pitt, Henry
Hoare, James Farrer, and the said James Fox were Plaintiffs, and the said Robert Mackreth, John Dawes, John
Baynes Garforth, and Oliver Farrer, by supplemental Bill,
were Defendants; and praying, "That the said Decrees
may be reversed or varied, or that the Appellant may
have such other Relief in the Premises, as to this
House, in their Lordships great Wisdom, shall think
fit; and that the said James Fox, William Morton Pitt,
Henry Hoare, and James Farrer, may be required to
answer the said Appeal:"
It is Ordered, That the said James Fox, William Morton Pitt, Henry Hoare, and James Farrer, may have a
Copy of the said Appeal, and do put in their Answer or
respective Answers thereunto in Writing, on or before
Tuesday the 16th Day of this Instant February.
Rocheid against Sir D. Kinloch et al.
Upon reading the Petition of James Rocheid Esquire,
Appellant in a Cause depending in this House, and of Sir
David Kinloch Baronet and others, Respondents thereto,
which stands appointed for hearing; setting forth, "That
this Cause involving Matter peculiar to the Law of Scotland, it is the Wish and Meaning of the Parties, that
Counsel from that Part of the Kingdom should attend
their Lordships at the Hearing, which cannot be accomplished without great Inconvenience and Expence,
till the Vacation of the Court of Session in March;"
and therefore praying, "That their Lordships will be
pleased to appoint this Cause to be heard on Monday
the 15th Day of March next, or such other Day as
their Lordships may think proper:"
It is Ordered, That the Hearing of the said Cause
be put off to Monday the 15th Day of March next, as
desired.
Magistrates of Edinburgh against Erskine et al.
A Petition of the Lord Provost, Magistrates, and Town
Council of the City of Edinburgh, Appellants in a Cause
depending in this House, and of the Honourable Henry
Erskine and other Members of the College of Justice in
Scotland, Respondents thereto, which stands appointed
for hearing, was presented and read; setting forth,
"That as this Cause is to settle certain Matters in Dispute between the City of Edinburgh, and the Members
of the College of Justice, of great Consequence to
both, and depends on the Construction of various
Laws and on Customs peculiar to Scotland, the Parties
think it necessary that Counsel from that Part of the
Kingdom should attend their Lordships at the Hearing,
which cannot be accomplished without great Inconvenience and Expence, till the Vacation of the Court
of Session in March;" and therefore praying, "That
their Lordships will be pleased to appoint this Cause to
be heard on Wednesday the 17th Day of March next,
or on such other Day as their Lordships may think
most proper."
And thereupon the Agents on both Sides were called
in, and heard at the Bar; and being withdrawn:
Ordered, That the Hearing of the said Cause be put
off to Wednesday the 17th Day of March next, as desired.
Causes put off.
Ordered, That the Hearing of the Errors argued,
assigned upon the Writ of Error, wherein the King is
Plaintiff, and Thomas Amery Defendant, which stands appointed for To-morrow, be put off to Friday next; and
that the Judges do then attend; and that the rest of the
Causes be removed in Course.
Appeals, Time for presenting, extended.
It being proposed, "To adjourn beyond the Time
limited by their Lordships Standing Order, for presenting Appeals (being Fourteen Days from the First
Day of every Session:)"
It is Ordered, That all such Appeals as shall be left
at the Parliament Office with the Clerk, within the Time
limited by the said Standing Order, during the Adjournment of the House, be read the next Sitting Day of the
House.
Adjourn.
Dominus Cancellarius declaravit præsens Parliamentum continuandum esse usque ad et in diem Veneris,
quintum diem instantis Februarii, horâ undecimâ Auroræ,
Dominis sic decernentibus.
DIE Veneris, 5o Februarii 1790.
Domini tam Spirituales quam Temporales præsentes
fuerunt:
|
Archiep. Ebor.
Epus. Glocestr. |
Ds. Thurlow, Cancellarius.
Dux Leeds.
Comes Morton.
Comes Strange.
Comes Mount Edgcumbe & Valletort.
Viscount Falmouth. |
Ds. Howard de Walden.
Ds. Cathcart.
Ds. Sandys.
Ds. Scarsdale.
Ds. Amherst.
Ds. Loughborough.
Ds. Hawkesbury.
Ds. Kenyon. |
PRAYERS.
Arbuthnott against Smart.
The Answer of Robert Smart, Merchant in Marykirk,
to the Appeal of the Honourable John Arbuthnott, was
this Day brought in.
The King against Amery, in Error.
The Order of the Day being read for hearing Counsel
to argue the Errors, assigned upon the Writ of Error,
wherein the King is Plaintiff, and Thomas Amery Defendant, brought in Order to reverse a Judgement given
in the Court of King's Bench for the said Defendant;
and for the Judges to attend:
Counsel were accordingly called in.
And the First Counsel for the Plaintiff having been
in Part heard.
The Counsel were directed to withdraw.
Ordered, That the further Hearing of the said
Cause be put off to Tuesday next, and that the Counsel
be called in at One o'Clock; and that the Judges do then
attend.
Moved, "That the Order made on Saturday last, for
the House to proceed further in the Trial of Warren
Hastings Esquire, on Monday next, be now read."
The same was accordingly read by the Clerk.
Ordered, That the said Order be discharged.
Hastings Trial deferred:
Ordered, That this House do proceed further in the
Trial of Warren Hastings Esquire, on Tuesday the 16th
Day of this Instant February, at Ten o'Clock, in Westminster Hall.
Message to H. C. to acquaint them therewith.
A Message was sent to the House of Commons, by
Mr. Leeds and Mr. Pepys, to acquaint them therewith.
Fraser against His Majesty's Advocate.
Upon reading the Petition of the Honourable Archibald Fraser, Appellant in a Cause depending in this
House, and of His Majesty's Advocate for Scotland, Respondent thereto: setting forth, "That the Petitioners
are desirous that the Hearing of this Cause may be
put off till next Session;" and therefore praying,
"That their Lordships will adjourn this Cause till next
Session of Parliament:"
It is Ordered, That the Hearing of the said Cause
be put off to the next Session of Parliament, as desired.
Hill against Sewell et al.
Upon reading the Petition and Appeal of Joseph Hill,
One of the Sworn Clerks of His Majesty's High Court
of Chancery, complaining of Two Orders of the said
Court, of the 3d of July 1788, and 16th of January
1789; and praying, "That the same may be rescinded,
or that the Appellant may have such other Relief in
the Premises as to this House, in their Lordships great
Wisdom, shall seem meet; and that William Luther
Sewell, John Kipling, Samuel Reynardson, Christian
Zincke, Nehemiah Winter, and Walden Henry Hanmer
Esquires may be required to answer the said Appeal:"
It is Ordered, That the said William Luther Sewell
and the said several other Persons last named, may have
a Copy of the said Appeal, and do put in their Answer or
respective Answers thereunto in Writing, on or before
Friday the 19th Day of this Instant February; and Service of this Order upon the Clerk in Court of the said
Respondents in the said Court of Chancery, shall be
deemed good Service.
Gibson and Johnson against Minet and Fector, in Error.
The House being moved, "That a Day may be appointed for hearing Counsel to argue the Errors,
assigned upon the Writ of Error, wherein Thomas
Gibson and Joseph Johnson are Plaintiffs, and Hughes
Minet and James Peter Fector Defendants:"
It is Ordered, That this House will hear the said
Errors argued by Counsel at the Bar, on the First
vacant Day for Causes after those already appointed.
Reports on Private Bills, Limitation of.
Ordered, That this House will not receive any Report from the Judges upon Petitions presented to this
House for Private Bills, after Tuesday the 20th Day of
April next.
Newnham and Co. against Steuart.
Upon reading the Petition and Appeal of Messieurs
Newnham, Everett, and Company, of London, Bankers,
and their Attornies, complaining of Two Interlocutors of the Lord Ordinary in Scotland, of the 24th
of January and 16th of June 1789, finding the Infestment for Security in Question not available for any
Sums paid or Obligations undertaken posterior to the
4th of February 1788; and also of an Interlocutor of
the Lords of Session there, of the 14th of November
1789; and praying, "That the same may be reversed,
varied, or amended, or that the Appellants may have
such other Relief in the Premises as to this House, in
their Lordships great Wisdom, shall seem proper;
and that David Steuart, Banker in Edinburgh, Trustee
for the Creditors of James Stein, may be required to
answer the said Appeal:"
It is Ordered, That the said David Steuart may have
a Copy of the said Appeal, and do put in his Answer
thereunto in Writing on or before Friday the 5th Day of
March next; and Service of this Order upon the said
Respondent, or upon any of his known Counsel or
Agents in the Court of Session in Scotland, shall be
deemed good Service.
Rutherford against Caverhill et al.:
Upon reading the Petition and Appeal of Mrs. Helen
Rutherford, the Widow of William Scott, late Merchant
in Newcastle; complaining of Two Interlocutors of the
Lords of Session in Scotland, of the 19th of December 1788
and 17th of November 1789; and praying, "That the
same may be reversed, altered, or amended, or that
the Appellant may have such other Relief in the Premises, as to this House, in their Lordships great Wisdom,
shall seem meet; and that Jerdon Caverhill (stiling
himself Archibald Jerdon), Son of Jean Jerdon, her
Uncle's Bastard Daughter, and other Parties in the
Cause, may be required to answer the said Appeal:"
It is Ordered, That the said Jerdon Caverhill and
others may have a Copy of the said Appeal, and do put
in their Answer or respective Answers thereunto in Writing, on or before Friday the 5th Day of March next;
and Service of this Order upon the said Respondents, or
upon any of their known Counsel or Agents in the Court
of Session in Scotland, shall be deemed good Service.
Spottiswoode to enter into Recognizance on said Appeal.
The House being moved, "That John Spottiswoode of
Sackville Street Gentleman, may be permitted to enter
into a Recognizance for Mrs. Helen Rutherford, on
Account of her Appeal depending in this House, she
residing in Scotland:"
It is Ordered, That the said John Spottiswoode
may enter into a Recognizance for the said Appellant, as
desired.
Sir J Riddell against Grosset:
Upon reading the Petition and Appeal of Sir James
Riddell of Ardnamurchan and Sunart Baronet, complaining of Two Interlocutors of the Lords of Session in Scotland, of the 17th of December 1789 and 27th of January
1790; and praying, "That the same may be reversed,
varied, or amended, or that the Appellant may have
such other Relief in the Premises, as to this House, in
their Lordships great Wisdom, shall seem meet; and
that James Grosset, late of Moredon, in the County of
Surry, may be required to answer the said Appeal:"
It is Ordered, That the said James Grosset may have
a Copy of the said Appeal, and do put in his Answer
thereunto in Writing on or before Friday the 5th Day of
March next; and Service of this Order upon the said
Respondent, or upon any of his known Counsel or Agents
in the Court of Session in Scotland, shall be deemed
good Service.
Spottiswoode to enter into Recognizance on said Appeal.
The House being moved, "That John Spottiswoode of
Sackville Street Gentleman, may be permitted to enter
into a Recognizance for Sir James Riddell Baronet, on
Account of his Appeal depending in this House, he
residing in Scotland:"
It is Ordered, That the said John Spottiswoode may
enter into a Recognizance for the said Appellant, as
desired.
De La Motte against Jardine.
Upon reading the Petition and Appeal of Mrs. Magdalene Barbarie de la Motte, Spouse of Captain William
Jardine of Applegirth, complaining of Two Interlocutors
of the Lord Ordinary in Scotland, of the 14th and 28th
of June 1788, and also of an Interlocutor of the Lords of
Session there of the 29th of November 1788; and praying, "That the same may be reversed, varied, or
amended, or that the Appellant may have such other
Relief in the Premises, as to this House, in their
Lordships great Wisdom, shall seem meet; and that
the said Captain William Jardine may be required to
answer the said Appeal:"
It is Ordered, That the said Captain William Jardine may have a Copy of the said Appeal, and do put in
his Answer thereunto in Writing on or before Friday the
5th Day of March next; and Service of this Order upon
any of the Counsel or Agents of the said Respondent in
the Court of Session in Scotland, shall be deemed good
Service.
Charge against Doe, in Error.
The Lord Kenyon, Lord Chief Justice of the Court of
King's Bench, in the usual Manner, delivered in at the
Table a Writ of Error, wherein
George Charge is Plaintiff,
and
John Doe Defendant.
His Majesty's Advocate against Milne, in Error.
Upon reading the Petition of the Advocate General of
Scotland, Plaintiff in a Writ of Error depending in this
House, wherein John Milne is Defendant; setting forth,
"That this Cause came on to be heard ex-parte in the
last Session of Parliament, when their Lordships were
pleased to put off the further Hearing to the present
Session; that as no Appearance has yet been made for
the Defendant, and as the Plaintiff is detained in Scotland," the Petitioner humbly prays their Lordships,
To put off the Hearing of this Cause to Monday the
22d Day of March next, or such other Day in the present Session, as to their Lordships shall seem proper:"
It is Ordered, That the further Hearing of the said
Cause be put off to Monday the 22d Day of March next,
as desired.
Armstrong against His Majesty's Advocate.
Upon reading the Petition of David Armstrong, Appellant in a Cause depending in this House, and of His
Majesty's Advocate for Scotland Respondent thereto;
setting forth, "That the Petitioners are desirous that the
Hearing of this Cause may be put off till next Session;"
and therefore praying, "That their Lordships will adjourn this Cause till next Session of Parliament:"
It is Ordered, That the Hearing of the said Cause be
put off to the next Session of Parliament, as desired.
Stevenson against Black et al.:
Upon reading the Petition of George Stevenson, Appellant in a Cause depending in this House, to which James
Black and others are Respondents; setting forth, "That
the Petitioner is advised to withdraw the Appeal in this
Cause;" and therefore praying, "That their Lordships will allow the said Appeal to be withdrawn, the
Appellant paying to the Respondents Fifteen Guineas
for their Costs; the Agents for the said Respondents
having signed the said Petition as consenting thereto:"
Appeal withdrawn with Costs.
It is Ordered, That the Petitioner be at Liberty to
withdraw his said Appeal as desired, upon Payment of
Fifteen Guineas Costs to the Respondents.
Arbuthnott against Smart.
The House being moved, "That a Day may be appointed for hearing the Cause, wherein the Honourable
John Arbuthnott is Appellant, and Robert Smart, Merchant in Marykirk, is Respondent:"
It is Ordered, That this House will hear the said
Cause by Counsel at the Bar, on the First vacant Day for
Causes after those already appointed.
Hastings' Trial, Witnesses to attend.
Ordered, That George Dallas Esquire and Lieutenant
David Birrell do attend on Tuesday the 16th Day of this
Instant February, at Ten of the Clock in the Forenoon,
to give Evidence at the Trial of Warren Hastings Esquire,
in Westminster Hall.
Rutherford against Jerdon et al.
The Answer of Archibald Jerdon of Bonjedward (formerly Jerdon Caverhill) and others, to the Appeal of
Mrs. Helen Rutherford, otherwise Scott, the Widow of
William Scott, late Merchant in Newcastle, was this Day
brought in.
Adjourn.
Dominus Cancellarius declaravit præsens Parliamentum continuandum esse usque ad et in diem Martis,
nonum diem instantis Februarii, horâ undecimâ Auroræ,
Dominis sic decernentibus.
DIE Martis, 9o Februarii 1790.
Domini tam Spirituales quam Temporales præsentes
fuerunt:
|
Epus. Roffen.
Epus. Bangor.
Epus. Norvicen.
Epus. Glocestr. |
Ds. Thurlow, Cancellarius. |
Ds. Howard de Walden.
Ds. Cathcart.
Ds. Middleton.
Ds. Amherst.
Ds. Loughborough.
Ds. Hawkesbury.
Ds. Kenyon. |
PRAYERS.
The King against Amery, in Error.
The Order of the Day being read for the further
hearing of Counsel to argue the Errors, assigned upon the
Writ of Error, wherein the King is Plaintiff and Thomas
Amery Defendant; and for the Judges to attend:
Counsel were accordingly called in.
And the first Counsel for the Plaintiff having been
fully heard:
The Counsel were directed to withdraw.
Ordered, That the further Hearing of the said Cause
be put off to Thursday next, and that the Judges do then
attend.
Customs, Excise, &c. Accounts of Duties, delivered.
The House being informed, "That Mr. Speer, from
the Treasury, attended:"
He was called in, and delivered at the Bar, pursuant
to the Directions of an Act of Parliament,
"An Account of the total Produce of the Duties of
Customs, Excise, Stamps, and Incidents respectively,
for One Year, ended the 5th Day of January 1790,
distinguishing (as far as possible) in each Branch the
Produce on every separate Article, the Duties on which
have amounted to One thousand Pounds or more, in
the Four Quarters of the said Year."
"An Account of the total Net Produce paid into the
Exchequer of the Duties of Customs of Great Britain,
distinguishing as far as possible the Produce on every
separate Article, the Duties on which shall have
amounted to £.1,000 or more, between the 5th January 1789, and the 5th of January 1790."
"An Account of the Total Net Produce (paid into
the Exchequer) of the Duties of Excise, distinguishing
as far as possible the Produce on every separate Article, the Duty on which has amounted to £.1,000 or
more, between the 5th January 1789, and the 5th
January 1790."
"An Account of the Total Net Produce paid into the
Exchequer of the Duties arising from the Stamp Revenue, that have amounted to £.1,000 or more, in
the Four Quarters next preceding the 5th of January
last."
"An Account of the Total Net Produce of the Duties
under the Head of Incidents, distinguishing (as far as
possible) in each Branch the Produce on every separate
Article, the Duties on which shall have amounted to
£.1,000 or more, in the Four Quarters next preceding the 5th January last."
No. 1. "An Accompt of all Additions which have
been made to the Annual Charge of the Public Debt,
by the Interest or Annuities for or on account of any
Loan which hath been made subsequent to the passing
of an Act of the 27th Year of the Reign of His present
Majesty, intituled, "An Act for repealing the several
Duties of Customs and Excise, and granting other
Duties in lieu thereof, and for applying the said Duties,
together with the other Duties composing the Public
Revenue; for permitting the Importation of certain
Goods, Wares, and Merchandize, the Produce or
Manufacture of the European Dominions of the French
King into this Kingdom; and for applying certain unclaimed Monies remaining in the Exchequer for the
Payment of Annuities on Lives, to the Reduction of
the National Debt."
2. "An Accompt of the Produce of the Duties imposed for the Purpose of defraying the encreased
Charge occasioned by the Loans, made in pursuance
of an Act of the 29th Year of the Reign of His present
Majesty, intituled, "An Act for raising a certain Sum
of Money by Way of Annuities;" and of one other
Act of the same Session, intituled, "An Act for raising a certain Sum of Money by Way of Annuities, to
be attended with the Benefit of Survivorship in Classes,"
from the respective Days (within the Year next preceding the Date hereof), from which the Duties commenced to the 5th of January 1790, made up pursuant
to an Act of the 27th Year of the Reign of His present
Majesty, intituled, "An Act for repealing the several
Duties of Customs and Excise, and granting other
Duties in lieu thereof, and for applying the said Duties,
together with the other Duties composing the Public
Revenue; for permitting the Importation of certain
Goods, Wares, and Merchandize, the Produce or
Manufacture of the European Dominions of the French
King into this Kingdom; and for applying certain unclaimed Monies remaining in the Exchequer for the
Payment of Annuities on Lives, to the Reduction of
the National Debt."
And then he withdrew.
And the Titles thereof being read by the Clerk:
Ordered, That the said Accounts do lie on the
Table.
Grosset against Sir J. Riddell.
Upon reading the Petition and Cross Appeal of James
Grosset, late of Moredon, in the County of Surrey, thereafter at Mains, in the Stewartry of Kirkcudbright, and now
of Barnstaple, in the County of Devon, and James Grosset
Junior, his Eldest Son; complaining of Two Interlocutors of the Lords of Session in Scotland of the 17th of December 1789, and 27th of January 1790, in so far as they
assoilzie Sir James Riddell from the Process of Reduction,
and find that the Petitioner James Grosset is not intitled to
any Abatement of the stipulated Rents for the Three
Years, during which he possessed the Farm in Question,
and assoilzie Sir James Riddell from that Claim, and also,
in so far as they do not find the Petitioners, entitled to Damages and Expences of Process, as concluded for by them;
and praying, "That the same may be reversed, varied,
or altered, in so far as complained of, or that the Appellants may have such other Relief in the Premises,
as to this House, in their Lordships great Wisdom, shall
seem meet; and that Sir James Riddell, of Ardnamarchan and Sunart, Baronet, may be required to
answer the said Appeal:"
It is Ordered, That the said Sir James Riddell may
have a Copy of the said Appeal, and do put in his
Answer thereunto in Writing, on or before Tuesday the
9th Day of March next; and Service of this Order upon
the said Respondent, or upon any of his known Council
or Agents in the Court of Session in Scotland, shall
be deemed good Service.
East Indies, List of Offices, delivered.
The House being informed, "That Mr. Morton, from
the Directors of the East India Company, attended:"
He was called in, and delivered at the Bar, pursuant
to an Act of the 24th Year of His present Majesty,
"A List of all Offices, Places, and Employments, in
the Civil and Military Establishments of the United
East India Company in the East Indies, with the Salaries, or Pay and Emoluments belonging thereto, or
allowed or paid by the said Company in respect
thereof."
And then he withdrew.
And the Title thereof being read by the Clerk:
Ordered, That the said List do lie on the Table.
Sir W. Chambers examined relative to the State of Westminster Hall:
Sir William Chambers was called in, and being examined, touching the State of Westminster Hall, and whether
the House might safely proceed therein upon the Trial of
Warren Hastings Esquire, on Tuesday next, acquainted the
House, "That the same was at present damp, but that
by the Assistance of Brasiers, and leaving the Windows
open to air the same, it might be made safe for the
House to proceed upon the Trial on Tuesday next."
The Hall to be aired.
Ordered, That the Deputy Great Chamberlain do
take Care that a sufficient Number of Brasiers be forthwith put in Westminster Hall, in order that the same may
be well aired, for the Reception of this House on Tuesday
the 16th Day of this Instant February.
National Debt, Account of, delivered.
The House being informed, "That Mr. Newland, from
the Bank of England, attended:"
He was called in, and delivered at the Bar, pursuant
to the Directions of an Act of Parliament,
"An Account from the Bank of England of the Receipt and Expenditure of £.1,197,155 6s. 3d. in One
Year, from February 2d 1789, to January 31st 1790,
by the Commissioners for the Reduction of the National Debt, and of the Receipt of £.295,015 to be
applied in the Quarter, between the 1st February and
1st May 1790."
And then he withdrew.
And the Title thereof being read by the Clerk:
Ordered, That the said Account do lie on the Table.
Davidson against Sir W. Dunbar et al.
Upon reading the Petition and Appeal of John Davidson, Land Waiter at Thurso, in the County of Caithness;
complaining of Two Interlocutors of the Lords of Session
in Scotland, of the 20th of January and 5th of February
1790; and praying, "That the same may be reversed,
varied, or altered, or that the Appellant may have
such other Relief in the Premises, as to this House, in
their Lordships great Wisdom, shall seem proper; and
that Sir William Dunbar of Hemprigs, John Campbell
Sutherland of Forse, and William Innes of Sandside,
may be required to answer the said Appeal:"
It is Ordered, That the said Sir William Dunbar,
John Campbell, and William Innes, may have a Copy of
the said Appeal, and do put in their Answer or respective
Answers thereunto in Writing, on or before Tuesday the
9th Day of March next; and Service of this Order upon
the said Respondents, or upon their known Counsel or
Agents in the Court of Session in Scotland, shall be
deemed good Service.
Adjourn.
Dominus Cancellarius declaravit præsens Parliamentum continuandum esse usque ad et in diem Mercurii,
decimum diem instantis Februarii, horâ undecimâ Auroræ, Dominis sic decernentibus.
DIE Mercurii, 10o Februarii 1790.
Domini tam Spirituales quam Temporales paæsentes
fuerunt:
|
Epus. Bangor.
Epus. Norvicen.
Epus. Glocestr. |
Ds. Thurlow, Cancellarius.
March. Stafford,
C. P. S.
Dux Norfolk, Marescallus.
Comes Morton.
Viscount Sydney. |
Ds. Cathcart.
Ds. Hawkesbury. |
PRAYERS.
Rutherford against Jerdon et al.
The House being moved, "That a Day may be appointed for hearing the Cause, wherein Mrs. Helen Rutherford, otherwise Scott, is Appellant, and Archibald
Jerdon and others are Respondents:"
It is Ordered, That this House will hear the said
Cause by Counsel at the Bar, on the First vacant Day for
Causes after those already appointed.
Koops for a Naturalization Bill:
Upon reading the Petition of Matthias Koops Esquire,
praying Leave to bring in a Bill for his Naturalization:
It is Ordered, That Leave be given to bring in a Bill,
according to the Prayer of the said Petition.
Bill presented.
Accordingly, The Lord Cathcart presented to the
House a Bill, intituled, "An Act for naturalizing Matthias Koops."
The said Bill was read the First Time.
Corn Indemnity Bill.
A Message was brought from the House of Commons,
by the Marquis of Graham and others:
With a Bill, intituled, "An Act for indemnifying all
Persons who have been concerned in advising or carrying into Execution certain Orders of Council respecting the Importation and Exportation of Corn and
Grain, and also certain Orders issued by the Governor
General of His Majesty's Colonies in America; and
for preventing Suits in consequence of the same; and
for making further Provisions relative thereto;" to
which they desire the Concurrence of this House.
Schusler's Naturalization Bill.
A Message was brought from the House of Commons,
by Mr. Hobart and others:
With a Bill, intituled, "An Act for naturalizing
Gottlob Gotthelff Schusler;" to which they desire the
Concurrence of this House.
The said Two Bills were, severally, read the First
Time.
Adjourn.
Dominus Cancellarius declaravit præsens Parliamentum
continuandum esse usque ad et in diem Jovis, undecimum
diem instantis Februarii, horâ undecimâ Auroræ, Dominis sic decernentibus.