ECONOMIC HISTORY
Agriculture
Fields, Inclosures, and Woodland
Minster's common fields were mentioned in 1362. (fn. 1) In
1557 they were called East and West fields, and lay probably south of the river on either side of the Brize Norton
road, in an area of some 500–700 a. still chiefly arable in
the 19th century. (fn. 2) New Field (c. 105 a.), between the
river and the Witney—Burford road, was mentioned in
the late 17th century when it was an area of inclosed
demesne, but may have been a former open field taken
into cultivation at an unknown date. (fn. 3) So, too, may
Townfield, a demesne close of 36 a. north of the river
mentioned about 1552. (fn. 4) By the later 17th century and
possibly by 1608 much of the arable, though still
described in terms of open-field land, seems to have
been consolidated into large blocks roughly coinciding
with 19th-century closes, and by the 1670s the Wheeler
family, lessees of the demesne farm, had inclosed land
south of the river in New Field. (fn. 5) Some open-field
arrangements or residual common rights must nevertheless have continued until the earlier 18th century,
since in 1749 it was reported that since 1708 'the
common fields' had been inclosed and the 'common
field lands exchanged'. (fn. 6)
In 1086 the chief manor was said to include 78 a. of
meadow; in 1287 it had 55 a., and in 1423 only 40
acres. (fn. 7) Little Minster manor included 20 a. in 1324, (fn. 8)
and the combined manor reportedly had well over 50 a.
of meadow in 1553, presumably along the river within
an area still under grass in the 19th century. (fn. 9) Lot
meadow was mentioned in 1634, (fn. 10) and a common
meadow called Thornbury was mentioned in the 17th
century, while Pillmore, mentioned in 1611, was still
common or town meadow in 1768. (fn. 11) Presumably most
meadows were inclosed with the arable in the 17th or
early 18th century, however, and by 1840 there were 120
a. or more of inclosed meadow adjoining the river. (fn. 12) A
medieval yardland in 1197 seems to have contained
around 31 a. of arable divided between two fields, and in
1294 a yardland belonging to the priory had 12 a. of
meadow, though that may have been exceptional. (fn. 13)
Common pasture lay perhaps in the parish's northeastern part between the manor house and Minster
woods, an area of over 330 a. known by 1553 as
Lordsfield. By then all or most was apparently inclosed
demesne. (fn. 14) Other pasture was available presumably in
the fields after the harvest, perhaps in demesne closes,
and in Minster woods and Wychwood Forest, where
Minster Lovell inhabitants retained pasture rights for
'horses and horned cattle' (though not for oxen, pigs, or
sheep) until the mid 19th century. (fn. 15) Common pasture
mentioned in 1739, 'so long as the same shall lie open
and not be enclosed', (fn. 16) was perhaps also in the Forest or
woods. At Wychwood's disafforestation in 1857 allotments in Wychwood and Asthall parishes, around
Fordwells, were awarded to Minster Lovell inhabitants
as compensation, in proportion to their holdings in
Minster; 108 a. was awarded in all, of which some 34 a.
were still common pasture. Most Minster inhabitants
received less than an acre, though Lady Taunton, as lady
of the manor and principal landholder, received nearly
35 acres. (fn. 17) Most Minster people sold their allotments
immediately after to others in Asthall, Leafield,
Curbridge, or Witney. (fn. 18)

71. Minster Lovell parish c. 1840, showing approximate location of former open fields
Woodland, though evidently reduced by medieval
assarting, covered much of the north-eastern part of the
parish until the 19th century. Woodland 1 league by 4
furlongs was noted in 1086, and 100 a., on later evidence a
severe underestimate, in 1287. (fn. 19) The woods were allegedly
afforested by Henry II and remained part of the purlieus
of Wychwood Forest in 1279, when they were valued at
20s. a year. (fn. 20) The right to pasture 60 pigs in the woods was
granted by the Lovels in 1197 to Thame abbey, and the
Lovels had pannage worth 12d. a year in 1286–7. (fn. 21) Though
the family were evidently refused the right to impark in
1297, they were allowed by the king to cut underwood in
1290, and in 1440 were licensed to impark Minster woods
and two fields adjoining; the woods were disafforested in
1442, the Lovels receiving the right to hunt and to appoint
their own officers. (fn. 22) The woods remained outside the
Forest purlieus in 1609, though their status was contested
throughout the 18th century. (fn. 23)
Small-scale assarting was carried out before 1252–3,
when the Lovels held 3½ a. of assart of the Crown for
21½ d. rent, increased to 5 a. before 1408; two 'fields'
disafforested with the woods in 1442 presumably represented further assarting, and by 1553 the large area of
demesne pasture south of the woods included closes
with names such as Pig Rooting, implying that some or
all had been taken from the woods. (fn. 24) In 1700, as in 1840,
the woods covered some 360 a., and were made up of
oak, ash, elm, and thorn. (fn. 25) Minster woods were cleared
soon after Wychwood Forest's disafforestation in 1857,
and by 1861 the land was chiefly arable, farmed from the
newly established Ringwood Farm. (fn. 26)
Tenants and Holdings 1086–1600
In 1086 the chief manor, assessed at 7 hides, was said to
have land for 10 ploughs, though 13 were recorded: 6 on
the demesne, worked in part by 2 slaves, and 7 held by 17
villani and 10 lower-status bordars. The estate's value
had fallen since 1066 from £10 to £7. On Little Minster
manor there was land for 3 ploughs, but only one (on the
demesne) was recorded, with 2 slaves and 2 bordars; the
estate's value was £3 as in 1066. (fn. 27)
By 1279 there were 30 villeins on Minster Lovell
manor, each holding half a yardland, and the demesne
had been reduced to 3 ploughlands. (fn. 28) Another 9 yardlands, presumably including former demesne, were
occupied by 5 freeholders, among them a chantry priest
endowed with 6 yardlands, and a smith and Godstow
abbey each with one. Sixteen cottagers, omitted presumably in error in 1279, were mentioned in 1286–7. (fn. 29) No
villeins were recorded at Little Minster, where 8
yardlands were let to Walter de Leckhampton for a total
of 96s., and were perhaps kept in demesne; another 6½
yardlands there were occupied by 7 freeholders, of
whom most held a yardland each. The villeins each owed
3s. rent, with labour services and small payments in kind
valued at 8s. 9d.; the services included 86 days' labour
throughout the year, 8 boonworks, 2 days' mowing, and
1½ days' carriage, the tenants owing in addition a hen at
Christmas and 5 eggs at Easter. Freehold rents were
11–12s. a yardland, while the smith at Minster Lovell
owed 13s. 4d., plough-repair, and the obligation to make
2 carts a year with the lord's iron. Cottagers' rents in
1287 averaged around 1s. each, with labour services
worth 6d.
Few landholders in the early 14th century were taxed
on goods worth more than 16–20s., the chief exeptions
being the lords or demesne lessees. In 1316 Maud
Lovel's husband John de Haudlo and the lord of Little
Minster, William de Cantelupe, were each taxed on
nearly £11, while Aymer de Valence, lord of nearby
Bampton and lessee of land at Little Minster, was taxed
on over £17. In 1327 one of the prominent Standlake
family of Witney, lessee of some 170 a., was taxed on
£42. (fn. 30) Among probably resident tenants or landowners,
the wealthiest included various members of the at Ford
family, taxed on 24s. in 1316 and on over £3 in 1327,
while four other taxpayers in 1327 were assessed on
between £5 and £7. The lowest assessment in 1316 was
on goods worth 32d. The overall value of goods assessed,
just over £57 in 1316 and £72 in 1327, suggests that the
parish was broadly typical of the area, assessed wealth
per head in 1316 averaging 46s., and in 1327 around
60s. (fn. 31)
Fourteenth-century depopulation seems to have
been marked, (fn. 32) and by 1423 seventeen tenants at will
held complete yardlands of the combined manor for 5s.
rent, implying that rents had fallen and that labour
services had been commuted. There were still 18
cottagers holding for 1s. each, and freehold rents
totalled 15s. 4d. and 1 lb of pepper. (fn. 33) The demesne,
reduced to 2 ploughlands by 1408 and possibly much
smaller by 1423, (fn. 34) was leased in its entirety probably
soon after; in the early 16th century it was held by
lessees of the manor house, who sometimes sublet all or
part. (fn. 35) Twenty landholders were taxed in 1523–4, only
four on goods worth more than £2 and eight paying the
lowest rate of 4d.; the wealthiest by far was Thomas
Umpton, one of a prominent local gentry family who
rented the demesne, grange, and warren, and possibly
the manor house. (fn. 36) Henry Wilkins, the wealthiest
taxpayer in the 1570s, (fn. 37) perhaps also held some former
demesne, and William Jenkins (d. 1588), head juror of
the manor court, held 6 copyhold yardlands in Little
Minster. (fn. 38)
Tenants and Holdings 1600–1800
In 1602 just over 17 yardlands were still copyhold, and
were occupied by 13 tenants of whom most held
between ½ and 1½ yardland each. (fn. 39) The widow of
William Howse, a wealthy taxpayer in the 1570s, (fn. 40) held 6
yardlands, possibly those formerly occupied by William
Jenkins. Eleven tenants at will held mostly cottages or
small parcels, though two held 1½ yardlands each. Of
two leaseholders one, John Truman, held the mill and
'the farm', presumably former demesne in Minster or
Little Minster, while Robert Williamson occupied
Minster Lovell manor house and demesne farm on a
21-year lease. Copyholders and tenants at will still paid
small customary rents, including some payments in
kind; the only commercial rent was £160 for the
demesne farm, which probably dominated farming in
the parish then as later. Inhabitants collectively paid 2s.
for a small meadow, and eight non-resident freeholders
owed small quitrents, many of them apparently for
detached lands in Chilson and Shorthampton. (fn. 41)
Thomas Shayler and members of the Harris family,
who held the mill and occasionally served as bailiffs for
the lord, were the wealthiest taxpayers throughout the
17th century, together with the Collis family, recorded
from the Middle Ages, and the Coppins. (fn. 42) A Collis and a
Harris were respectively taxed on 5 and 6 hearths in
1662 and 1665, while in 1693 William Collis left goods
worth £160, and in 1709 Christopher Coppin's were
worth £412. (fn. 43) Both the Collis and the Harris families
survived in the 19th century, when the Collises
remained major independent farmers and called themselves gentlemen.
By 1700 John Wheeler held 768 a. with the manor
house (Minster Lovell Hall), and Henry Peacock 276 a.
in Little Minster, probably with the Old Manor House.
Both appear to have been resident gentleman-farmers,
though in the early 18th century the Wheelers sometimes sublet all or part of their land. Robert Harris was
lessee of the mill, held with a small farm of 11 acres.
Together those and two other small leaseholds
comprised some 1,073 a., 73 per cent of cultivated land
in the parish; the remaining 380 a. was still held by 24
customary tenants on similar terms to a century earlier,
the largest single holding being 55 acres. Both the leasehold and the customary farms were still held for lives,
customary rents reportedly falling short of the lands' real
value by £175, and rents of the leaseholds by £540. (fn. 44)
During the early 18th century there was a move towards
shorter leases and more commercial rents, and by 1740
much of the manor farm was held on 21 -year leases for a
total of £412 by Robert Coppin and Joseph Mallam. (fn. 45) By
the late 18th century the parish was divided among 7
tenant farmers of whom the largest, John Nutt, payed
over £20 land tax in 1785, and the rest between £5 and
£14. Most seem to have farmed around 200–300 a., the
Wheelers' large demesne having by then been broken
up. All held most of their land of the manor, though a
few had small freehold parcels, and John Nutt and John
Busby respectively held the rectory and vicarage estates
with their other farms. Few smallholders were recorded,
and only the woods were kept in hand. (fn. 46)
Farming to c. 1800
Farming was mixed from the Middle Ages, the chief
grain crops in the 17th century being wheat and barley,
with some beans, peas, and oats. (fn. 47) By 1671 the Wheelers
farmed inclosed land south of the river, (fn. 48) and were introducing new crops such as clover and sainfoin, (fn. 49) while
focusing increasingly on sheep farming. Turnips were
mentioned from 1803, intermixed with wood. (fn. 50) Sheep
were recorded in 1197, (fn. 51) and the demesne farm included
a cowhouse and probably a sheep fold by the early 15th
century. (fn. 52) A small yeoman in 1607 had 12 sheep, (fn. 53) and in
the late 17th and early 18th century most testators left
some livestock: in 1693 one of the Collis family had 6
horses, 12 cows or heifers, 2 pigs, and 50 sheep, while in
1709 Christopher Coppin left 24 cows, 6 horses, 9 pigs,
and 120 sheep. (fn. 54) Also mentioned from the 16th century
were malt and bees, and the usual domestic dairying and
cheese-making.
Woodland was kept in hand throughout the medieval
and early modern period, some of it being coppiced. In
1552 there were three coppices of between 28 a. and 48
a., at three stages in a cycle of up to 22 years; one coppice
included 100 oaks, and another 140. (fn. 55) In 1607 both the
wood and its perimeter wall were well kept, though the
largest copse was badly fenced and much of the wood
had been eaten. (fn. 56) Timber was regularly sold from Postern
Copse in 1610, and from other copses at 10 years'
growth between 1611 and 1623. (fn. 57) In 1700 the woods
totalled 359 a., including Crawley (86 a.), Queens'
Standing (44 a.), Cock and Hen (43 a.), Postern (32 a.),
Wisdom Wood (38 a.), Bagg (19 a.), and Hix (84 a.)
coppices, the last three actually in Asthall parish; they
were worth in growth £100 a year beside timber, and the
Cokes' total income from the woods was estimated at
£368. (fn. 58) Timber and hunting rights were rarely leased,
though John Wheeler, made deputy ranger in 1707, was
allowed to cut 20 loads of wood a year as firewood. (fn. 59)
Frequent complaints were made about waste or trespass,
including mismanagement of the woods by the bailiff's
appointee, interference from the ranger of Wychwood,
illegal cutting of wood by tenants, and damage to young
trees by illegal pasturing. (fn. 60)
The 19th and 20th Centuries
Most of the manor, some 1,447 a. including the manorial farm (306 a.), was sold to W.E. Taunton in
1812–13, (fn. 61) much of the rest being sold in lots to various
tenants, who became owners-occupiers. (fn. 62) After 1825
Taunton enlarged the manorial farm, which was let to a
tenant farmer, by buying back land from smaller freeholders, but though the manor farm remained the
largest in the parish, freeholds amassed by the farmer
John Walker and by Taunton's tenant in Little Minster,
John Hale, were almost as large. (fn. 63) A few outsiders,
among them the Witney banker John Clinch, bought
land which they leased to local farmers. (fn. 64) By 1840 there
were five farms of over 100 a., including those of John
Walker (267 a.) and Sarah Collis (188 a.), both freeholds; the Hales' farm at Little Minster was 245 a., and
Richard Dix and John Gillett, a well-known Cotswolds
sheep-breeder, worked Manor farm as Taunton's
tenants. (fn. 65)
The overall pattern remained broadly similar
throughout the mid 19th century, with usually 3 or 4
farms of over 150–200 a.; a few smaller freeholders
occupied holdings varying from 2 or 3 a. to 30 acres. (fn. 66) By
1871 the Gilletts farmed the 486-a. Manor farm and
employed 26 people, having perhaps acquired some of
the Hales' leasehold land after Jane Hale's death; the
largest farm then and later, however, was Ringwood
farm (600 a.), made up chiefly of former woodland
cleared since 1857, and leased to a family of newcomers,
the Abrahams, who in 1871 employed 30 people. (fn. 67) By
1881 it was 800 a., the three other chief farms being
College farm in Little Minster (315 a.), Starveall farm
(330 a.), and Manor farm, which together employed
some 30 people. (fn. 68) Manor farm (c. 306 a.), sold by W.E.
Taunton's heirs in 1874, continued to be leased to
tenant farmers until the late 20th century, (fn. 69) but was
broken up when the house was sold in 1973, the land
being taken into neighbouring farms. The Minster
Lovell branch of the Agricultural Labourers' Union went
on strike in 1872, seeking Union harvest rates of 4s. a day
without beer for 11 hours' work; employers came to
terms soon after, one after holding out for a few days. (fn. 70)
In 1840 the parish was 63 per cent arable, with 19 per
cent woodland and 13 per cent under grass. (fn. 71) The woodland was almost completely cleared by 1860, but otherwise land-use changed little by 1914, when the parish
remained 67 per cent arable and 33 per cent permanent
pasture. (fn. 72) In the 1850s and 1860s John Gillett (d. 1855)
and his sons were among the main breeders of Cotswold
Down and Oxford Down sheep, selling over 130 in
1853. (fn. 73) Sheep were mentioned as the main agricultural
resource when the farm was sold in 1874, the chief crops
being turnips and barley. (fn. 74) By 1914 the chief crops in the
parish were barley (21 per cent), wheat (18 per cent),
and oats (11 per cent), with swedes and turnips (11 per
cent) and mangolds (1 per cent) presumably for fodder,
and a few potatoes (2.3 per cent). Sheep farming was still
important, though as elsewhere numbers were falling,
and cattle were kept in relatively small numbers (11 per
100 acres). The number of pigs was among the highest in
the county. (fn. 75)
Twentieth-century farming in the parish saw many
smaller farms absorbed into larger units. In 1941–2
Joseph Abraham of Ringwood farm had 135 a. under
wheat and 32 a. under barley, with some oats (92 a.) and
potatoes (22 a.), and 200 a. sown with clover and
sainfoin. Farmers such as H.E. Batts of College farm,
W.E. Luckett of Bushy Ground, A. Bourne of Whitehall
farm, and the Viners of Manor farm grew similar crops
but on a lesser scale, while most smaller farmers were
engaged in market gardening, producing potatoes,
pulses, and other vegetables. Only the Abrahams of
Ringwood farm pursued large-scale sheep farming,
keeping a flock of 446 alongside 74 cows and heifers, 126
pigs, and poultry and horses. J. A. Fenemore of Hill farm
had 93 sheep and 41 cattle, grazed on 124 acres. Several
smaller farmers had up to 10 cows and 5–10 pigs, and
most were poultry producers. (fn. 76)
In 2000 Ringwood remained by far the largest farm at
900 a.; other large farms were Lower Field and Folly
farms (85 a. combined), together with Bushy Ground
(150–200 a.), Whitehall (250 a.), Hill Grove (300 a.),
and Charterville farms (60 a.). Whitehall and Hill Grove
were then farmed from outside the parish. Ringwood
farm pursued mixed farming, employing 2 men from
the village; Whitehall and Bushy Ground were mainly
arable family-run farms, while Lower Field and Charterville farms reared sheep and cattle, the former providing
employment for a single villager. (fn. 77)
Agriculture in Charterville
In the mid 19th century most Charterville settlers had
between 2 a. and 4 a. each, but as they were drawn from a
wide area and mostly had no experience of agrarian life
many experienced difficulties. (fn. 78) The 2-a. plots were
especially vulnerable, and though they were originally
granted a cottage and capital of £7 10s. a year, most
allottees could not make a living out of even 4 a. and
soon returned to urban industrial employment: by 1850
only 33 of the original allottees remained, and in 1861
only two. The settlement was reorganized in 1852, a few
of the original colonists buying their holding and
becoming freeholders, while the rest acquired permanent leases or became ordinary tenants. By then most
holdings had been taken over by local agricultural
labourers or by others with a rural occupation, and were
concentrated in fewer hands, 44 lots being owned by 28
people. In 1889 there were 33 freeholders, 9 leaseholders, and 18 tenants; some holdings were as large as
12 a., and the number of 4-a. plots had risen from the
original 34 to 39. Most were held by occupiers with
other sources of income, such as labourers with some
savings, small tradesmen, seasonal agricultural workers,
and retired officers or police constables with a pension.
Plots were continually sought after, sometimes as an
investment, by outsiders from Witney or elsewhere as
well as by local people, and in 1913–14 a total of 25 holdings out of 69 (102 a. in all) were owner-occupied, the
rest being sublet to local people.
The period between 1858 and 1887 was that of
Charterville's greatest prosperity, based chiefly on
potato crops, which at the time were not grown by
larger local farmers. Charterville potatoes sold at
£30–40 an acre, ensuring a monopoly and a constant
demand for holdings. In the early 1880s agricultural
depression led other local farmers to take up potato
cultivation, and the market was further depressed by
potato disease, leaving many smallholders ruined;
nevertheless Charterville seems to have withstood the
depression better than some larger farms, partly
because its economy was essentially geared to immediate consumption. Landlords were prepared to reduce
rents and to be flexible with arrears in order to keep
good tenants: hence many standard 1-year leases were
extended, for example a 7-year lease offered for the
most successful market-gardener.
Barley, wheat, beans, and oats were also grown in
Charterville, and from 1885 the number of fruit trees
increased. Nevertheless, at the turn of the 19th and 20th
centuries the chief crop continued to be potatoes, with
some market gardening, vegetable-growing, pig and
poultry farming, and bee-keeping. Most holdings had a
strip under corn, a strip under barley, and a strip under
potatoes, the remainder devoted to rye-grass, vegetables,
fruit trees, strawberries, and radishes; pork and potatoes
formed the colonists' staple diet as well as being sold,
and most tenants were self-sufficient except for groceries
and clothing. Several also had horses and a few cows. A
major obstacle was the absence of an organized cooperative system for carting, buying implements, or banking:
Oxford and Cheltenham were too distant and lacked
direct transport, while Witney remained a market of no
more than local importance.
Trades and Crafts
The usual rural trades and crafts were recorded from an
early date. A smith was mentioned in 1279, (fn. 79) and a
tanhouse was attached to Minster Lovell manor house
possibly in the early 15th century and certainly in the
16th. (fn. 80) Between the 16th and the 18th centuries a baker,
tailor, currier, fuller, butcher, maltster, and victuallers
were recorded, and a blanket-weaver in 1729; (fn. 81) a weaver
in 1641 left goods worth £26, but owed £108 to creditors. A fuller was mentioned in 1726, (fn. 82) and a fulling mill
existed at Minster Lovell by 1768, (fn. 83) presumably serving
the Witney blanket industry.
In the 19th century various tradesmen were recorded:
millers, bakers, grocers, stonemasons, a wheelwright, a
carter, blacksmiths, carpenters, a basket-weaver, and
innkeepers, as well as dressmakers and tailors, who were
especially numerous in the 1860s. (fn. 84) Other inhabitants
included a postmaster, a police constable, a machinist,
and one tea-dealer. Several inhabitants worked in mills
in neighbouring Asthall or Witney: 3 fullers and 2
factory-workers were noted in 1841, 4 fullers and 8
factory workers in 1851, and 16 factory workers and 3
fullers in 1861, though in 1891 there were none. From
1896 large numbers were employed at Pritchett and
Webley's blanket mill at Worsham (in Asthall), whose
failure in the early 20th century caused serious distress in
Minster Lovell. (fn. 85) Glovemaking, chiefly by wives and
daughters of agricultural labourers, was also recorded,
10 glovers being noted in 1851, 18 ten years later, and 14
in 1891. Quarrying was carried out on a small scale: it
was first mentioned in 1197, (fn. 86) and regularly throughout
the 19th century, when several masons lived in the
parish and several quarries were recorded. The parish
nevertheless remained essentially agricultural, 68 per
cent of families being supported from agriculture in
1831 and still in 1881. (fn. 87)
Tradesmen during the earlier 20th century included a
gas-fitter, wireless and optical engineers, a painterdecorator, and a joiner, besides office-workers and a
nurse working outside the parish. (fn. 88) Some inhabitants in
the late 20th century were employed in small service
industries such as the shop and post office, but most
commuted to work elsewhere.
Mills and Fisheries
In 1086 two mills were recorded on Minster Lovell
manor and one at Little Minster. (fn. 89) The latter was
presumably the water corn mill held in 1324 by Aymer
de Valence with part of Little Minster manor, which
passed the following year to Thomas West; no later
references have been found, and the site is unknown. (fn. 90)
The Minster Lovell mills, possibly under one roof, may
have stood, as later, by the bridge at the village's western
end: two adjoining mills there, one for corn and one for
fulling, were mentioned in 1197 when William Lovel
and his wife Isabel gave them to Thame abbey, which
returned them in 1224 following protracted litigation. (fn. 91)
By 1287 there was only a corn mill, which remained part
of the chief manor until the early 19th century. (fn. 92) In the
late 16th century it was apparently held by copy, (fn. 93) but
during the 17th and earlier 18th century it was leased for
3 lives to members of the Harris family, who presumably
employed a miller. (fn. 94)
The building was reportedly thatched in 1609. (fn. 95) In
1748 there were two stones, and Thomas Harris was
apparently to build an adjoining mill and to provide
grist-stones: certainly there was a double mill by 1768,
one half still for corn, and the other, at its west end, used
for fulling. The two were separately let on 20-year leases,
the fulling mill with a nearby meadow which was used
for tentering. (fn. 96) There was still a corn and fulling mill in
1812, (fn. 97) but by 1851 again only a corn mill. (fn. 98) In 1813 the
mill was sold with the rest of the manor, passing to the
Hudsons and later to the Coopers, resident millers; the
premises included a bakery and malthouse which were
still used in the 1880s. (fn. 99) The mill ceased to function in
1924, and in the 1960s the building was converted first
into a research laboratory, and later into a conference
centre. (fn. 100)
A possible mill-leat and pond have been identified
south-east of the medieval manor house, (fn. 101) but no documentary evidence for a mill on that site has been found.
Remains of a leat survive at Lower Field Farm west of
Little Minster, (fn. 102) where corn milling was carried out
probably in the 19th century.
Fisheries
Fishing rights in that part of the river Windrush
included within the parish belonged to the lords of
Minster Lovell and of Asthall. (fn. 103) In 1279 the fishery was
leased to a tenant for 6s. 8d. a year, (fn. 104) though in 1423 it
was valued at only 2s. (fn. 105) In the 16th century it was let with
the manor house and demesne. (fn. 106) Fishing rights in a short
stretch of river near the bridge were separately let with
the mill in the late 12th century and still in the 1550s. (fn. 107)
During the 18th and early 19th century the Cokes and
Tauntons sometimes reserved fishing rights, (fn. 108) which
seem to have been sold piecemeal with the rest of the
manor in 1812–13: by 1840 several freeholders and
tenants had rights in small stretches of the river. (fn. 109)
Residual fishing rights were sold with the remains of the
Minster Lovell estate in 1920 and 1922. (fn. 110) A mussel pond
and weir were mentioned in the 19th century. (fn. 111)