HUISH CHAMPFLOWER
The ancient parish of Huish Champflower, its
name in part signifying a cultivated area and in part
its ownership in the 12th century by the Champflower family, (fn. 1) lay in two separate parts on the
southern slopes of the Brendons, of which nearly
one third was described as hills, woods, and waste
in 1839. (fn. 2) The two parts together measured 2,909 a.
in 1881, but when the detached area of Chipstable
parish which divided them was added to Huish in
1884 the area increased to its present size of 1,349 ha.
(3,334 a.). (fn. 3)
The southern portion of the ancient parish, which
contains the village of Huish, occupies an irregular
area rising to the west of the river Tone, including
the valleys of two parallel streams. The southern
boundary lies on Heydon Hill (c. 338 m.) above
Huish moor, where rough common ground was
shared with Chipstable until inclosure in 1845. (fn. 4) To
the north the boundary with Clatworthy rises to
309 m. The western boundary follows a small
stream.
The northern part of Huish lies on the steep
slopes of the Brendons and is divided from the
southern by the diamond-shaped portion of Chipstable comprising East Withy and Chitcombe. It is
irregular in shape, its north-east and south-west
boundaries marked by streams now running into
Clatworthy reservoir, one of which, considered to be
the headwater of the river Tone, (fn. 5) was disputed in
1231. (fn. 6) To the north-west the parish reaches the
plateau of Brendon Hill (375 m.) and a ridge beyond
at 396 m. The boundaries of the open ground on
Brendon Hill are marked by the Bronze Age monolith known as Dun's Stone (Dinneston in 1187) (fn. 7) and
by a stone known in the 12th century as Doleston. (fn. 8)
Part of this northern section, an estate known as
Middleton, probably became part of Huish parish
when its tithes were granted to the chaplain of Huish
in 1187. (fn. 9)

The parish measures nearly 7 km. from Heydon
Hill in the south to Brendon Hill in the north. The
northern part of the parish lies on slates, siltstones,
and sandstones of the various beds of the Upper
Devonian Morte Slates. In the south the Morte
Slates continue southwards to Huish moor, where
Pickwell Down beds are found beneath the ground
rising to Heydon Hill. (fn. 10) Small, disused quarries are
found throughout the parish. (fn. 11)
Three round barrows lie on or near the boundaries
of the parish, one at the northern edge near the
Brendon ridgeway, and two on Heydon Hill. (fn. 12) Huish
village is a small nucleated settlement including the
church on sloping ground above the Tone in the
south-east corner of the parish. Scattered farms were
established elsewhere in the parish: Middleton
(Middledon) is mentioned in 1187, (fn. 13) Stolford
(Stoford) also in the late 12th century, and Sperry
(Spareheghey) by 1306. (fn. 14) Other farms, probably of
similar antiquity, such as Catford, Brown (formerly
'Bruneland'), (fn. 15) Shute, and Coombe, were subsequently divided, forming grouped holdings such as
East and West Catford or Lower, Middle, and
Higher Brown farms. In the early 19th century there
were cottage encroachments on the edge of Huish
moor, (fn. 16) at Winters beside the road between Shute
and Catford, (fn. 17) and in the extreme south-west at
Sanders Barnstaple, a name transferred from a small
deserted farmstead in Raddington parish by 1822. (fn. 18)
In contrast, farmsteads called Nuttons and Paul's
Guys, both in the north part of the parish on the
high ground, were merged into neighbouring holdings in the 19th century and lost their identity. (fn. 19)
No trace of open arable cultivation has been found
in the parish. Brendon Hill and Huish moor were
used as common pasture until inclosure in 1845
under an Act of 1842. (fn. 20) The road pattern which
links the scattered farms includes two main northsouth routes. One is above the valley of the Tone,
through Huish village and crossing the river by
Huish bridge. The other, a continuation of the wide
route forming the Chipstable-Raddington boundary, (fn. 21) gives direct access to the Brendon ridge. An
east-west route became prominent in the 18th century when the road from Wiveliscombe through
Langley Marsh to the Watchet-Bampton road,
entering Huish at Washbattle (formerly Maundown)
bridge and passing through the village, (fn. 22) was turnpiked in 1786. (fn. 23) A new road across Huish moor was
created in 1843 as part of the inclosure. (fn. 24)
Surviving farmhouses reveal building phases in
the 16th and 17th centuries and remodelling in the
18th; at least one large house was built in the 19th
century. The former West Catford Farm and the
neighbouring Catford Farm both have 16th-century
origins, the first decorated internally with good
plaster work in the 1670s. (fn. 25) The former Middle
Brown Farm, in 1981 used as a farm building, and
West Coombe Farm were modest buildings of the
17th century, the latter remodelled in the 18th
century. (fn. 26) Middleton Court, so called by 1807, (fn. 27) was
built probably for Thomas Gordon, formerly of
Melton Mowbray (Leics.), (fn. 28) on the site of an earlier
farm. It has a symmetrical five-bayed front with a
steep pediment, the stone doorcase having an ogee
head. Alterations were made in 1855 by Sir Walter
Trevelyan, (fn. 29) when stables and farm buildings were
probably added. Coombe End is a large, threestoreyed house of the late 19th century, with panelling said to have come from the medieval church at
Upton. (fn. 30)
The Castle inn, built as a farmhouse c. 1821, (fn. 31) had
become a public house by 1833 and an inn by 1840. (fn. 32)
There were 125 taxpayers in 1667. (fn. 33) The population rose sharply from 321 in 1801 to 454 in the
decade before 1841. The high level was maintained
until the 1860s, but was followed by a rapid fall to
226 by 1901. Since that date the level has varied
little, and in 1971 was 213. (fn. 34)
MANORS.
Ailric held the manor of HUISH, later
HUISH CHAMPFLOWER, T.R.E., and Roger
Arundel in 1086. (fn. 35) The overlordship of the manor
descended, like that of Raddington, (fn. 36) with the
barony of Poorstock (Dors.), passing to the Newburgh family. (fn. 37) In 1276 Henry de Newburgh granted
land and fees, not specifically including Huish, to
Queen Eleanor. (fn. 38) By colour of this grant the queen
usurped other lands which had not been involved,
including 2 knights' fees in Huish and Holford St.
Mary (in Lydeard St. Lawrence). (fn. 39) In 1284–5
Henry's barony was described as held of the queen, (fn. 40)
and in 1292 the terre tenants of Huish were said to
hold of the king because of the feoffment to Queen
Eleanor. (fn. 41) The fees in Huish and Holford St. Mary
were declared c. 1305 to have been wrongfully taken
by the queen when John de Newburgh claimed
them, (fn. 42) but it is doubtful if they were recovered
since John's son Robert (d. 1338) (fn. 43) alleged in 1326
that the 2 fees were in the hands of the king as
Eleanor's heir. (fn. 44) The manor was said to be held of
the king in chief by the terre tenant in 1339, but of
Robert de Newburgh in 1333 and retrospectively in
1352, and of Robert's son Thomas in 1362 when it
was said to be held of Winfrith Newburgh manor
(Dors.). (fn. 45) In 1585 the manor was said to be held of
the Crown. (fn. 46)
In 1166 Thomas de Champflower held 3 fees of
Gerbert de Percy, lord of the barony of Poorstock,
and was therefore probably the terre tenant of Huish.
He may have been succeeded by John de Champflower, who held a fee in 1196–7 and 1201–2 which
Thomas had also held of the barony of Dunster. (fn. 47)
Another Thomas de Champflower held 2 fees in
Huish of Robert de Newburgh in 1212 (fn. 48) and died
c. 1222 leaving two daughters as heirs. After some
dispute Huish was assigned as dower to Thomas's
widow Nichole, then married to William Waleys or
Walsh. (fn. 49) Nichole was still alive in 1243, (fn. 50) but had
died probably by 1252 when Ralph Waleys, son of
William, and his wife Joan, elder daughter of
Thomas de Champflower, held an estate in Huish of
Ralph's father. (fn. 51) Ralph and Joan in 1268 claimed
land in Huish of the inheritance of Joan, (fn. 52) to whom
alone the lordship of Huish was ascribed in 1274 and
1277. (fn. 53) By 1285 Joan had been succeeded by
Nicholas Waleys, (fn. 54) probably her son, who died c.
1292 holding the manor and advowson of Huish
jointly with his wife Margery. (fn. 55)
By 1303 (fn. 56) the manor had passed to John Waleys
(d. by 1333), whose son and heir Nicholas (fn. 57) had
died c. 1339 leaving two infant daughters, Joan and
Elizabeth, as heirs. (fn. 58) On the death of both daughters
under age on the same day in 1350 the manor was
divisible between Nicholas's two surviving sisters
and the issue of two dead sisters, (fn. 59) subject to the
dower of his mother Rose (d. 1361) and his widow
Maud (d. 1359), who married as her second husband
Walter Cancy. (fn. 60)
In 1393 Alice, one of the sisters of Nicholas
Waleys and one of the heirs of another sister, Edith, (fn. 61)
together with her second (fn. 62) husband, Williame Colne,
made a settlement of two thirds of the manor. (fn. 63) By
1397 Alice had made a feoffment of those two thirds
to Sir Hugh Courtenay (fn. 64) (d. 1425), of Haccombe
(Devon). Sir Hugh's widow Maud (d. 1467) in 1428
and 1431 held part of Huish; in 1431 she was apparently living there and her estate was called the
manor. Their son, Sir Hugh Courtenay (d. 1471) of
Boconnoc (Cornw.), (fn. 65) was succeeded by his own son
Edward, who was attainted and lost his estates in
1484 for his support of the duke of Buckingham
against the king. (fn. 66) Huish manor was granted by
Richard III in 1485 to John Verney. (fn. 67) Later that
year Edward was created earl of Devon and regained
his estates, but on his death in 1509 the earldom and
lands were forfeited because his son and heir,
William, had previously been attainted. William,
restored to favour and created earl of Devon in 1511,
was succeeded in the same year by his son Henry,
created marquess of Exeter in 1525 and attainted and
executed in 1539. (fn. 68) Some of Henry's lands, including Huish, were granted in 1544 to John de Vere,
earl of Oxford, who was immediately licensed to sell
Huish to John Lucas. (fn. 69) Lucas was succeeded in 1556
by his son Thomas, (fn. 70) who in 1567 conveyed it to
William Edney of London. (fn. 71) In the same year Edney
was licensed to sell one third of the manor to
Alexander Sydenham of Luxborough and the whole
manor and advowson to Thomas Cappes of Jews, in
Wiveliscombe. (fn. 72) Sydenham, who was apparently
owner of the Brett share of Huish manor as mentioned below, bought from James and Nicholas
Cappes in 1576 an estate described as half the
manor. (fn. 73)
One part of Nicholas Waleys's estate passed to his
sister Maud's son Simon Brett, (fn. 74) who was of age by
1355 (fn. 75) and who unsuccessfully challenged Alice
Colne's title to two thirds of Huish manor in 1393 (fn. 76)
and Sir Hugh Courtenay's in 1397 and 1404. (fn. 77)
Simon's estate had passed by 1423 to William Brett
of Brushford, (fn. 78) who was still alive in 1445. (fn. 79) In 1508
Alexander Brett sold c. 300 a. in Huish and the
advowson or a share of it to William Nethway, (fn. 80) and
John Nethway was licensed in 1548 to sell to John
Norman, clerk, an estate which was said to comprise
the manor and advowson of Huish Champflower. (fn. 81)
Probably by virtue of acquiring that estate Alexander
Sydenham presented a rector in 1561. (fn. 82)
Alexander Sydenham died in 1585 leaving an only
daughter Elizabeth, wife of John (later Sir John)
Poyntz of Iron Acton (Glos.). (fn. 83) Poyntz sold Huish in
1603 to Warwick (later Sir Warwick) Hele of Wembury (Devon). (fn. 84) Sir Warwick died in 1626 leaving as
heir a nephew John (later Sir John) Hele still under
age. (fn. 85) Sir John died between 1646 (fn. 86) and 1648. (fn. 87) By
1663 the advowson and presumably the manor had
passed to Sir John Stawell (fn. 88) of Bovey Tracy (Devon).
Sir John died in 1670 (fn. 89) leaving his son William to
succeed as a minor. (fn. 90) William and two trustees held
the estate in 1687. (fn. 91) By 1720 Samuel Crooke had
acquired half the manor, evidently through his wife
Elizabeth, and in 1733 he conveyed half to John
Cooke. (fn. 92) In the following year Cooke, then of Exeter,
shared possession of Middleton farm with Barbara
Taylor, also of Exeter. (fn. 93) An estate described as the
manor and half the farm was sold by Cooke in 1752
to James Bryant of Withiel Florey. (fn. 94)
In or after 1774 Bryant was succeeded by his
daughters, Amelia, wife of Thomas Stowell of Winsford, and Peggy, wife of John Bryant of Luxborough.
The daughters in 1780 conveyed the lordship to Sir
John Trevelyan of Nettlecombe. Sir John died in
1828, and was succeeded as lord of Huish by his
second son, the Revd. Walter Trevelyan, under a
settlement of 1788. (fn. 95) By 1831 the lordship comprised
a few cottages and small chief rents. (fn. 96) The Trevelyan
trustees disposed of the remaining chief rents later
in the century, (fn. 97) but no sale of the lordship took
place, and it is assumed that it passed on the death of
Walter Trevelyan in 1830 successively to his son
John (d. 1852), John's son Willoughby (d. 1867), and
Willoughby's son Sir Walter John Trevelyan, Bt.
(d. 1931). From 1891 (fn. 98) the lordship was held by the
successive owners of Nettlecombe manor. (fn. 99)
ECONOMIC HISTORY.
In the mid 11th century
Huish gelded for 2¾ hides but had land for 12
ploughteams. The demesne farm had 2 teams and
was worked by 5 serfs. Twenty villeins and 6 bordars
had 6 teams. The 20 a. of meadow were presumably
near the village, beside the Tone and its tributary
streams; there were 60 a. of woodland. The pasture,
measuring a league by half a league, was perhaps the
later common land on Huish moor and Heydon Hill.
There was a flock of 100 sheep. (fn. 100)
The land in the northern part of the parish, more
easily reached from the Brendon ridge, was being
exploited by the late 12th century as independent
estates. The Hospitallers acquired a holding there,
based on the later Middleton farm, before 1187. (fn. 101)
Stolford was also a separate farm by the late 12th
century. (fn. 102) In 1306 William of Stolford granted his
holding to Richard of Middleton in return for an
annuity of 6 marks and an obligation to provide him
with 1 bu. of pilcorn or rye every fortnight, 3s. in
silver three times a year, 6 ells of russet cloth at
Christmas, 4 ells of linen cloth and 5 lb. of wool at
Pentecost, and pasture for 2 cows. (fn. 103) By the mid 15th
century several other landowners had acquired
pasture in the area. (fn. 104)
In the main part of the parish John Waleys's holding in 1333, which included land in Holford St.
Mary, comprised a capital messuage, 40 a. of arable,
small parcels of meadow and of uncultivated hill
ground, the rents of 10 free tenants, 6 customary
tenants, and 4 cottagers, works worth 6d., and chevage worth 3d. (fn. 105) William Nethway's share of Huish
manor in 1510 included 80 a. of pasture and 40 a. of
furze and heath. (fn. 106) By that time the Courtenay
demesne holding was let. (fn. 107)
The 10 freeholds of Huish manor recorded in
1333 may represent scattered separate farms, characteristic of the Brendons. (fn. 108) They probably included
the ferling holding of Ingeram Brome by 1402 (fn. 109) and
the Knollys family's farms of East Coombe and
Woodhouse established by 1515. (fn. 110) A farmer at
Stolford in 1573 had the right to take timber from
the 'out hedges' of his enclosed farm. (fn. 111) By the end of
the 16th century both freehold and copyhold farms
were often substantial. Shute farm measured 66 a.
by 1546, (fn. 112) and by the end of the century farms were
recorded with the following extents: Stolford 200 a.,
Sperry 75 a., Newhouse or Milland 67 a., West
Catford 64 a., and Westcombe, perhaps the modern
Coombe End, 36 a. (fn. 113) Newhouse and Catford were
held for two centuries by the Marsh family, who had
acquired the freehold of Catford by 1655. (fn. 114) Westcombe was held on a 99-year lease in 1599; (fn. 115) Coombe
Tenement, later East Coombe or Coles's, now
Coles's Farm, was apparently enfranchised by
1679. (fn. 116) Enfranchisement continued into the 19th
century. (fn. 117)
A farmer at Stolford had rye, wool, heifers, and
sheep in the late 16th century, (fn. 118) and at least three
farms in the 17th century had a preponderance of
sheep. (fn. 119) By the 18th century there was a marked
distinction between the hill and the valley farms.
The hill farms were usually larger, and were often
owned by outside landowners. Brown, for instance,
belonged to the Wyndhams, and passed to the
Trevelyans in 1706; (fn. 120) Stolford was also Wyndham
property, but was divided before the end of the century, and part had passed by 1833 to J. S. Fry, the
Bristol chocolate manufacturer. (fn. 121) The Escotts of
Carhampton occupied part of the divided Brown
holding called Middle Brown by the mid 19th century, (fn. 122) and Sperry was held by the Davie family of
Creedy Park (Devon) as part of their estate centred
on Bittescombe in Upton. (fn. 123) By c. 1818 the Trevelyans had disposed of Lower Brown, (fn. 124) and by 1839
Higher and Lower Brown together formed a single
farm of 226 a. Middleton was then 233 a. (fn. 125)
The southern farms were still small in the early
19th century with the exception of Sperry (215 a.),
though holdings at Catford and Shute had been
joined to neighbours. (fn. 126) 'Summering' pasture was
available for rent at Coombe farm in 1805 (fn. 127) and by
the 1820s a dairy had been established at Shute. (fn. 128)
The inclosure of Huish moor apportioned some
grassland to the southern farms, (fn. 129) though much of
the area was wooded, contributing most of the total
of 99 a. of woodland for the whole parish. (fn. 130) Two hill
farms, Beverton and Tone, were formed on the inclosure of Brendon Hill in 1845. (fn. 131)
In 1839 there were 779 a. of arable, about a quarter
of the whole parish. (fn. 132) By 1905 a third of the parish
was under plough, and woodland had diminished. (fn. 133)
Changes in ownership in the later 19th century
included the attachment of Catford to the FergusonDavie holding of Bittescombe (fn. 134) and the creation of
the Hancock estate based on Coombe House. (fn. 135) In
the 1940s the break-up of the Trevelyan estate
marked the end of large holdings in the parish. (fn. 136) By
1976 there were 29 separate farms, nearly all under
grass, of which seven measured between 50 ha. and
199 ha. Four were dairy farms and eight were partly
or entirely sheep farms. (fn. 137)
A fulling mill mentioned in the early 17th century
and a woolcomber in 1705 are isolated evidence of
the cloth industry in Huish. (fn. 138) Quarrying was carried
on in the late 18th century, (fn. 139) and slates and tiles were
produced by 1796. (fn. 140) Pit debris and a powder magazine, associated with the Raleigh's Cross iron workings, were within the northern boundary of Huish. (fn. 141)
There was a mill, presumably for corn, on the
manor by 1086. (fn. 142) It remained part of the manorial
estate until sold in 1687, (fn. 143) and by 1785 was known
as Washbittle, later Washbottle or Washbrittle, (fn. 144)
and in 1980 Washbattle. It ceased to grind soon after
1910. (fn. 145) There was another mill, probably at Brown,
in 1572. (fn. 146)
LOCAL GOVERNMENT.
By 1274 the lady of the
manor took and kept strays, presumably by ancient
custom. (fn. 147) The lordship in 1339 and the early 16th
century included pleas of court sometimes from one
and sometimes from two sessions a year, (fn. 148) but no
manorial records have been found earlier than 1831.
In that year the manorial rental included payments
for a room to hold the court, the charges of the
tithingman and the reeve for issuing notices, gifts to
five poor men of the jury, and the costs of crying the
court twice. Two years later there were payments
only for crying the court in church on two Sundays
and to the tithingman for his 'attention to the
commons'. (fn. 149)
Churchwardens' accounts from 1675 were occasionally signed in the late 17th century by two overseers and two or four sidesmen. (fn. 150) A decision of the
parish in 1722 was witnessed by the rector and five
parishioners, and a vestry continued to approve the
wardens' accounts until at least the 1840s. (fn. 151) Highway surveyors were appointed in 1691 by the tithingman, a warden, and three householders. Wardens
served in rotation according to their holdings, (fn. 152) and
appointments of both wardens and overseers were
recorded in the overseers' accounts dating from
1769. Payments, recorded separately as weekly,
bastard, and extraordinary, were made in the parish
by the late 18th century, and an agreement was made
in 1797 with a Wiveliscombe doctor to attend the
poor. (fn. 153) A pay table stood at the west end of the aisle
in the parish church. (fn. 154) By 1831 the overseers were
renting the former church house as a poorhouse. (fn. 155)
One family was assisted to emigrate to Canada in
1830. (fn. 156) The parish became part of the Dulverton
poor-law union in 1836. In 1894 the parish formed
part of the Dulverton rural district, and in 1974 became part of the West Somerset district. (fn. 157)
CHURCH.
There was a chaplain at Huish Champflower by 1187, (fn. 158) and a church is mentioned in
1226. (fn. 159) Until 1951 the living was a sole rectory. From
that date it was held with Clatworthy, and from 1967
also with Chipstable and Raddington, the four becoming a united benefice in 1971. (fn. 160)
On the death of Thomas de Champflower the
advowson of the living passed in 1226 to his daughters. (fn. 161) It evidently descended in a junior branch of
the family until the death of the widow of Matthew
Champflower c. 1297, when the Crown presented
during the wardship of the heirs. (fn. 162) The advowson
thereafter descended with the manor and, after its
division, with that part held by the Courtenays between 1422 and 1525, although a share of the
advowson seems to have been included in the Brett
estate in 1508 when it passed to William Nethway. (fn. 163)
John Nethway was licensed in 1548 to grant his right
of presentation to John Norman, clerk. (fn. 164) Alexander
Sydenham, later to acquire part of the manor and the
advowson which went with it, presented a rector in
1561, but his right to do so was successfully challenged shortly afterwards by Thomas Lucas, then in
possession of the main manorial estate. (fn. 165)
Thereafter the advowson descended with the
manor until the 1680s, but grants of the next presentation were made by the Heles, under which Philip
Atherton of Bradford on Tone presented John
Atherton in 1622, and Christopher Pitt, clerk, presented in 1637. The Crown presented in 1636 on
Atherton's promotion to a bishopric. (fn. 166) In 1683 the
Stawell trustees sold the advowson to Thomas
Comens of Wiveliscombe, to hold in trust for the
curate William Nichols. Comens, then of Huish,
presented Nichols as rector in 1687. Robert, son of
Thomas Comens, presented on Nichols's death in
1701, but in the following year, acting as Nichols's
trustee, he sold the advowson to John Pym, clerk, of
Litton Cheyney (Dors.). Pym presented in 1703, but
in the next year he sold the advowson to trustees for
the benefit of Samuel Taylor, the rector whom he
had already presented. (fn. 167) In 1735 Taylor settled the
property on his prospective son-in-law, William
Willis of Selworthy, who became rector in 1743 on
Taylor's death, at the presentation of Thomas
Camplin and Thomas Willis, clerks. (fn. 168) William
Willis, then of Luccombe, presented in 1757 and
1761, on the second occasion appointing his son
William to the living. (fn. 169) Samuel Willis of Boxwell
(Glos.), brother of the last, was patron by 1781, and
two years later he sold his rights to Sir John
Trevelyan. (fn. 170) The advowson then descended with the
Trevelyan estate, and at least four members of the
family held the living between 1803 and 1958:
George Trevelyan, rector 1803–23, John Thomas
Trevelyan, 1833–5, John Woodhouse, 1836–72, and
Philip Woodhouse Perceval Hancock, 1915–58. In
1957 the advowson was transferred to the bishop of
Bath and Wells. (fn. 171)
The living was valued at £5 6s. 8d. in 1291, (fn. 172)
£13 9s. 4½d. net in 1535, (fn. 173) £130 c. 1668, (fn. 174) and £288
net in 1831. (fn. 175) The tithes were worth £11 6s. 8d. in
1535, (fn. 176) and a tithe rent charge of £254 6s. 9d. was
agreed in 1841. (fn. 177) The glebe was valued at 51s. in
1535. (fn. 178) There were c. 119 a. of glebe by 1606, (fn. 179)
151½ a. by 1839, (fn. 180) and 200 a. in 1939. (fn. 181)
By 1606 the glebe house had a wainscotted hall
and parlour, with six glazed windows. Among the
adjoining buildings were a gatehouse, bakehouse,
and dovecot. (fn. 182) The house was undergoing 'thorough'
repair in 1815, (fn. 183) and further work was done in
1836–8 creating a square, symmetrical house of three
bays with shallow pitched roofs arranged around a
central well, with older work to the west, the whole
standing in ornamental grounds above a lake. (fn. 184) The
house, destroyed by fire and rebuilt, with the help of
parishioners, c. 1924, (fn. 185) was occupied by successive
incumbents until c. 1972, when it was sold. (fn. 186) It had
a private chapel in 1401. (fn. 187)
Thomas Paye, rector 1422–61, a lawyer and
diocesan penitentiary, was licensed soon after his
appointment to spend a year in the service of the
patron, Sir Hugh Courtenay. (fn. 188) There was a parish
chaplain in 1468. (fn. 189) John Tyler, rector 1525–61,
seems to have survived all the Reformation changes, (fn. 190)
but a chalice and ornaments could not be recovered
in Mary's reign, and the walls of the church were
painted with Biblical texts in the Protestant style,
probably in Elizabeth's reign. (fn. 191) The present communion cup dates from 1573. (fn. 192) John Atherton,
rector 1622–36, was accused of non-residence in
1630, the year when he became prebendary of Christ
Church, Dublin. He held the rectory with the
chancellorship of Killaloe and also of Dublin, and
was promoted to the bishopric of Waterford and
Lismore in 1636. (fn. 193) Chancel and parsonage house
were then said to be in decay. (fn. 194) William Willis,
rector 1743–57, was at the same time resident rector
of Selworthy. (fn. 195) William, his son, served Huish in
person from 1761 until the 1780s, but thereafter the
parish was cared for by curates until the appointment
as rector of William Darch in 1823. (fn. 196) George
Trevelyan, rector 1803–23, was also rector of Nettlecombe, where he lived, and from 1817 archdeacon of
Taunton. (fn. 197) His curate at Huish in 1815 was the
resident rector of Clatworthy. Services were then
held every Sunday, alternately morning and evening. (fn. 198) William Darch also held the living of Raddington, but by 1827 was taking prayers and
preaching at Huish each Sunday, and holding evening services on alternate weeks. (fn. 199) By 1840 services
were held twice every Sunday. (fn. 200) In 1851 the congregations on Census Sunday, considered 'about
average', totalled 110 in the morning, including 32
from the Sunday school, and 190 in the afternoon,
including 37 children. (fn. 201)
A church house, standing on the edge of the
churchyard until after 1849, (fn. 202) was a two-storeyed
building with a chimney and a tiled roof in the 17th
century. It was then owned by the lord of the manor
and was let to the churchwardens. (fn. 203) By 1831 it was
held by the overseers. (fn. 204)
The church of ST. PETER, so dedicated by
1535, (fn. 205) consists of chancel with north chapel, nave
with north aisle and south porch, and west tower. A
bequest was made in 1534 towards the new ambulatorium, (fn. 206) probably the aisle. Persistent local tradition
maintains that the large six-light east window of the
wide chancel chapel, with the remains of early 15th-century glass, evidently once a Jesse window, and
probably also the arcade, were brought c. 1537 from
the dissolved priory of Barlinch, near Dulverton. (fn. 207)
The arcade is not characteristic of local work, and is
thought to be an amalgam of 14th- and 15th-century
features. (fn. 208) The remainder of the church seems to date
from the 15th century, the tower containing a bell
by Robert Norton of Exeter (1410–40). (fn. 209) The body of
the wooden eagle lectern is also of the 15th century.
A medieval screen, probably crossing the north aisle,
is said to have been removed to Bicknoller in 1726. (fn. 210)
A roodloft survived in 1683, (fn. 211) and a chancel screen
was still in position in 1798. (fn. 212) Alterations elsewhere
included the construction of the tower arch in 1703,
a singing gallery in the aisle in 1713, a canopied,
three-decker pulpit in 1717–18, and a singing gallery
near the belfry c. 1795. (fn. 213) There were extensive repairs
in 1846, (fn. 214) and the church is said to have been restored
c. 1875–80, when the chancel arch was replaced. (fn. 215)
The registers date from 1559 and appear to be
complete. (fn. 216)
Bequests to the fabric of All Saints made in 1534
and 1535 (fn. 217) may refer to a separate building, possibly
a chapel at Middleton founded by 1187. (fn. 218)
NONCONFORMITY.
A family of Presbyterians
was living in the parish in 1776. (fn. 219) In 1803 a house at
Winters was licensed for worship by an unspecified
denomination. (fn. 220)
EDUCATION.
Clatworthy school in 1818 took
children from Huish, (fn. 221) but a church school was
established at Huish by 1825. (fn. 222) A Sunday school was
started in 1832. By 1835 there were two day schools
with 37 pupils, whose parents paid fees, and the
Sunday school had 79 pupils under one paid
teacher. (fn. 223) By 1839 one school was held in a building
on the glebe near Huish bridge, (fn. 224) between Huish
and Clatworthy, known in 1847 as the Huish
Champflower and Clatworthy village school, and in
1851 as Bridge School House. (fn. 225) This same school
had 58 children attending by day in 1847, and
another 25 attended in the evenings. (fn. 226) The other day
school and the Sunday school seem to have closed.
About 1857 the school moved to a new building
west of the village on the road to Catford, which the
rector, John Woodhouse, had converted from a
cottage. (fn. 227) The building was extensively altered in
1870 and again in 1898. (fn. 228) By 1903 the school and
school house, held by trustees of Woodhouse's heir,
the Revd. Frederick Hancock, were leased to the
then rector for school use. (fn. 229) There were 40 children
on the books. (fn. 230) It remained a voluntary school, but
from 1950 took only children under the age of
eleven. In that year there were 77 on the books. (fn. 231)
Numbers fell rapidly, and the school was closed in
1963, children from the village travelling thereafter
to school in Wiveliscombe. (fn. 232)
CHARITIES FOR THE POOR.
By will dated 1781
Richard Marsh left £10, the interest to be paid at
Easter to parishioners not receiving relief. The sum
of £5 was also given for the same purpose by John
Cruze or Cruwys before 1786. (fn. 233) The charities, their
combined income totalling 15s. usually shared between 12 people, were paid until 1807. Thereafter,
the capital seems to have been merged into the
general parish stock. (fn. 234) A legacy of £1 a month given
to the poor by Richard Darch was referred to in 1843,
but no money had been received or distributed. (fn. 235)