House of Lords Journal Volume 14
10 May 1689

Sponsor

History of Parliament Trust

Publication

Year published

1767-1830

Page

Annotate

Comment on this article
Double click anywhere on the text to add an annotation in-line

Citation Show another format:

'House of Lords Journal Volume 14: 10 May 1689', Journal of the House of Lords: volume 14: 1685-1691 (1767-1830), pp. 207. URL: http://british-history.ac.uk/report.aspx?compid=13058 Date accessed: 30 August 2014.


Highlight

(Min 3 characters)

DIE Veneris, 10 die Maii.

Domini tam Spirituales quam Temporales præsentes fuerunt:

L. Arch. Yorke.
Epus. London.
Epus. Winton.
Epus. Landaffe.
Epus. St. Asaph.
Epus. Carlisle.
Epus. Exeter.
Epus. Sarum.
Marq. de Halyfax, C. P. S.
Dux Cumberl'd.
Dux Norfolke.
Dux Somersett.
Dux Grafton.
Dux Beaufort.
Dux Northumbl'd.
Comes Lindsey, L. Great Chamberlain.
Comes Devon, L. Steward.
Comes Oxon.
Comes Shrewsbury.
Comes Derby.
Comes Bedford.
Comes Bridgewater.
Comes Bristoll.
Comes Manchester.
Comes Mulgrave.
Comes Rivers.
Comes Stamford.
Comes Kingston.
Comes Carnarvan.
Comes Bath.
Comes Craven.
Comes Aylisbury.
Comes Sussex.
Comes Macclesfeild.
Comes Nottingham.
Comes Rochester.
Comes Abingdon.
Comes Monmouth.
Vicecomes Newport.
Vicecomes Weymouth.
Vicecomes Hatton.
Ds. Delawar.
Ds. Eure.
Ds. Wharton.
Ds. Pagett.
Ds. North.
Ds. Chandos.
Ds. Brooke.
Ds. Lovelace.
Ds. Maynard.
Ds. Coventry.
Ds. Herbert.
Ds. Jermyn.
Ds. Biron.
Ds. Vaughan.
Ds. Culpeper.
Ds. Lucas.
Ds. Cornwallis.
Ds. Delamer.
Ds. Crew.
Ds. Ossulston.
Ds. Dartmouth.
Ds. Godolphin.

PRAYERS.

Marq. de Halyfax Speaker pro Tempore.

Bernardiston versus Regem, in Error.

ORDERED, by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal in Parliament assembled, That this House will hear the Errors argued on Tuesday next, at Ten of the Clock in the Forenoon, wherein Sir Samuell Bernadiston is Plaintiff, and Their Majesties are Defendants.

And it is further ORDERED, That Their Majesties Counsel have Notice hereof.

ORDERED, That the Lord Grey de Ruthin hath Leave to go into the Country for some Time.

Agutter versus Collins.

Upon hearing Counsel this Day at the Bar, upon the Petition of Nathaniell Agutter and Mary his Wife, complaining of a Dismission of their Bill, in the Court of Chancery, by the late Lord Chancellor Jeffryes in June 1686, and other Things in the Petition set forth; as also upon the Answer of Samuell Collins Gentleman, Jane Collins Widow, Anne and Margarett Collins, put in thereunto:

After due Consideration, on either Part, by Counsel thereupon, it is ORDERED and Adjudged, by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal in Parliament assembled, That the said Petition of Nathaniell Agutter and Mary his Wife be, and is hereby, dismissed this House.

Adjourn.

Marquis de Halyfax, Orator Procerum pro Tempore, declaravit præsens Parliamentum continuandum esse usque in diem Sabbati, videlicet, 11um diem Maii instantis, hora decima Aurora, Dominis sic decernentibus.