DIE Mercurii, 25 Novembris.
Domini tam Spirituales quam Temporales præsentes
fuerunt:
|
Arch. Cant.
Arch. Yorke.
Epus. London.
Epus. Durham.
Epus. Winton.
Epus. Rochester.
Epus. St. David's.
Epus. Sarum.
Epus. Chester.
Epus. Worcester.
Epus. Oxon.
Epus. Ely.
Epus. Norwich.
Epus. Peterborough.
Epus. Gloucester.
Epus. Chichester.
Epus. Bath & Wells.
Epus. Bristoll. |
Ds. President.
Dux Norfolke.
Dux Ormond.
Dux St. Albans.
Dux Bolton.
March. Hallifax.
Ds. Magnus Camerarius.
Ds. Senescallus.
Ds. Camerarius.
Comes Shrewsbury.
Comes Kent.
Comes Pembroke.
Comes Lincolne.
Comes Suffolke.
Comes Bridgewater.
Comes Denbigh.
Comes Bristoll.
Comes Clare.
Comes Westmerland.
Comes Manchester.
Comes Mulgrave.
Comes Rivers.
Comes Stamford.
Comes Kingston.
Comes Carnarvon.
Comes Chesterfeild.
Comes Bath.
Comes Craven.
Comes Sussex.
Comes Feversham.
Comes Berkeley.
Comes Rochester.
Comes Abingdon.
Comes Monmouth.
Comes Montagu.
Comes Marlborough.
Comes Torrington.
Comes Warrington.
Viscount Newport.
Viscount Weymouth.
Viscount Sidney.
Viscount Longueville.
Viscount Villers. |
Ds. Willoughby Er.
Ds. De la Ware.
Ds. Berkeley Ber.
Ds. Fitz Walter.
Ds. Eure.
Ds. Chandos.
Ds. Brooke.
Ds. Grey.
Ds. Maynard.
Ds. Jermyn.
Ds. Vaughan.
Ds. Colepeper.
Ds. Lexington.
Ds. Berkeley Str.
Ds. Cornwallis.
Ds. Crew.
Ds. Keveton.
Ds. Carteret.
Ds. Ossulston.
Ds. Godolphin.
Ds. Cholmondley.
Ds. Ashburnham. |
PRAYERS.
L. Keveton to attend.
ORDERED, That the Lord Keveton attend this House
on Saturday next.
Ewelme Hospital versus Borough of Andover.
The House being this Day moved, "That Colonel
Richard Holt may enter into Recognizance for Mr.
Drake, upon the Appeal depending in this House,
between Ewelme Hospital and the Town of Andover:"
It is ORDERED, by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal in Parliament assembled, That the said Colonel
Richard Holt may enter into Recognizance, as desired,
for Mr. Drake.
Fleetwood versus Fleetwood.
Upon reading the Petition of Richard Fletewood Appellant, against Richard Fletewood Defendant, "That
a Day may be appointed for hearing of his Cause:"
It is ORDERED, by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal in Parliament assembled, That this House will hear
the said Cause, by Counsel on both Sides, at the Bar,
on Saturday the Twelfth Day of December next, at
Ten of the Clock in the Forenoon.
Causes put off.
It is ORDERED, by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal in Parliament assembled, That the Causes this Day
appointed, wherein Benjamine Albin is Appellant, and
Samuel Moyer Respondent; and also the Cause wherein
George Hitchcocke is Defendant, and Obadiah Sedgwick
Plaintiff; and the Cause wherein Lady Parker is Appellant, and Thornhill and others are Respondents; shall
be heard, by their Counsel, at the Bar, on Monday
the Thirtieth Day of this Instant November, at Nine of
the Clock in the Forenoon.
Moore's Bill.
Hodie 1a
vice lecta est Billa, intituled, "An Act for
enabling Francis Moore, of Essex, Esquire, to sell the
Manor of Bayhouse and Lands in West Thorock, in the
County of Essex, and to purchase and settle other
Lands in Lieu thereof."
Shatterden's Bill.
Hodie 1a
vice lecta est Billa, intituled, "An Act to
vest the Estate, late of Henry Drax Esquire, deceased,
in Thomas Shatterden Gentleman; and to enable the
said Thomas Shatterden and others, to whom the said
Estate is devised, to make a Jointure."
Roberts's Bill.
The Earl of Stamford reported the Bill, intituled,
"An Act to vest certain Messuages, Lands, and Tenements, in Thorpe Langton and elsewhere, in the County
of Leicester, in Trustees, to be sold, for Payment of the
Debts of Richard Roberts Esquire, and for raising
Portions for his Daughters," as fit to pass, with some
Amendments.
Which were read Twice, and agreed to; and the Bill
ordered to be engrossed.
Mountagu's Bill.
Hodie 1a
vice lecta est Billa, intituled, "An Act for
the vesting and settling divers Lands in Gloucestershire
in Trustees, to be sold, for the Payment of the remaining Portions to the Children of George Mountagu
Esquire, deceased."
The Question was put, "Whether this Bill shall
pass?"
It was Resolved in the Affirmative.
Message to H. C. with it.
A Message was sent to the House of Commons, by
Sir Miles Cooke and Doctor Edisbury:
To carry down the said Bill, and desire their Concurrence thereunto.
Then there arose a Debate, "Whether, at the Rising
of the House this Day, it shall not be adjourned to
Saturday next?"
After Debate;
The Question was put, "Whether this House shall
fit on Friday next?"
It was Resolved in the Negative.
Contents to go below the Bar when the House divides.
Then, upon the Division of the House, a Debate
arose, "Whether the CONTENTS, or NOT CONTENTS,
upon Divisions in the House, shall go out for the future?"
After Debate;
This Question was proposed, "Whether, for the
future, upon Divisions in the House, the CONTENTS shall go out?"
Then this previous Question was put,
"Whether this Question shall be now put?"
It was Resolved in the Affirmative.
Then the main Question was put,
"Whether, for the future, upon Divisions in the
House, the CONTENTS shall go out?"
It was Resolved in the Affirmative.
It is Resolved upon the Question, That, for the future, when there shall be a Division in the House, upon
any Question, the CONTENTS shall go below the Bar,
and the NOT CONTENTS stay within the Bar: And it
is ORDERED, That this Resolution be added to the Roll
of Standing Orders of this House.
Legh versus Aspinall.
Whereas Friday next was appointed for hearing the
Causes, wherein Richard Legh and others are Plaintiffs,
and Gilbert Aspinall is Defendant, and the Cause wherein John Woollaston is Plaintiff, and Richard Stephens Defendant; and it being also ordered, that the House
should then be in a Committee, to proceed on the Bill
for regulating Trials for Treason:
It is this Day ORDERED, That this House will, on
Saturday next, hear the said Causes, and be in a Committee to proceed on the said Bill.
Browne versus Wayte.
Whereas this Day was appointed for hearing the
Judges, and giving Judgement, upon the arguing of the
Errors assigned upon the Writ of Error depending in
this House, wherein Richard Browne is Plaintiff, and
Edmond Wayte Defendant:
After having heard the Judges, and Debate thereupon, this Question was put,
"Whether this Debate shall be adjourned to Saturday next?"
It was Resolved in the Negative.
Then, after further Debate upon some Question that
did arise, this main Question was proposed,
"Whether all the Judges shall be heard, before
the House proceed to give Judgement in this
Case?"
Then this previous Question was put,
"Whether this Question shall be now put?"
It was Resolved in the Affirmative.
Then the main Question was put,
"Whether all the Judges shall be heard, before
the House proceed to give Judgement in this
Case?"
It was Resolved in the Affirmative.
It is ORDERED, by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal in Parliament assembled, That the Hearing the
Judges in this Case, and the Debate thereupon, shall
be adjourned to Monday next; and that all the Judges
do then attend the House, to answer such Questions as
they shall be asked in this Case.
It is ORDERED, by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal in Parliament assembled, That all the Judges do attend this House on Monday next, at Ten of the Clock
in the Forenoon.
Adjourn.
Rob'tus Atkyns, Miles de Balneo, Capitalis Baro de
Scaccario, Orator Procerum, declaravit præsens Parliamentum continuandum esse usque in diem Jovis, (videlicet,) 26um diem Novembris, hora decima Aurora, Dominis sic decernentibus.