EDINGTON
The parish of Edington lies about 2 miles east of
Westbury. (fn. 1) It is an irregular rectangle in shape,
with a wedge-like projection to the west. Its length
from north to south is about 6 miles; its greatest
width is about 3 miles, but for most of its length it is
only about a mile wide. In 1934 a strip of varying
width running the whole length of the boundary
between Edington and East Coulston was transferred to the civil parish of East Coulston. (fn. 2) The
north of the parish lies on the Kimmeridge clay
lands of mid-west Wilts; it is low and well watered,
rising from about 150 ft. at the boundary with
Keevil to about 250 ft. near Edington village, and
is mainly permanent pasture. A stream, formerly
called Milbourne, (fn. 3) rises at Luccombe Bottom,
south of Bratton. It flows northward for some way,
forming the parish boundary, and then north-eastward across Edington parish toward Keevil.
South of the village the northern scarp of Salisbury
Plain rises sharply to over 600 ft., and the southern
part of the parish is all on the chalk, between 500
and 700 ft. high, reaching 739 ft. on Tinhead Hill.
Between the Kimmeridge Clay and the chalk are
outcrops of Upper Greensand and Gault, on which
the villages of Edington and Tinhead, the chief
centres of population in the parish, are built. Here
there is some arable, and there is also a considerable
area under the plough along the northern edge of
the Plain. (fn. 4) The downland in the south is mainly
included in the military training district centred
on Imber. There is little woodland, but on the
lower ground there are many trees in the hedgerows.
The secondary road from Westbury to West
Lavington crosses the parish from west to east.
Edington and Tinhead villages lie on this road and
to the north of it, and from them minor roads lead
north-westward to Steeple Ashton and Trowbridge.
In 1773 a road to Bulkington existed, (fn. 5) but its
course is now marked only by a lane and a footpath. The old slowcoach route from Bath to Salisbury ran from Steeple Ashton to Tinhead and up
to the top of Coulston Down. Coaches ran on it in
1712, (fn. 6) and it was turnpiked as far as Tinhead Hill
in 1751-2. It was not included in the renewing
Act of 1767-8 (fn. 7) and was last mentioned in coaching
tables in 1780. Several milestones, one dated 1766,
and a toll house near Ivymill Farm still remain. (fn. 8)
None of the roads south of the Westbury-Lavington road is now (1959) passable except by farm
vehicles. The main railway line from Westbury to
Lavington passes north of the village. A station,
known as Edington and Bratton, was opened when
the line was built in 1900, but closed for passengers
in 1952. (fn. 9) The station buildings have since been
pulled down.
Edington village is built round spurs which
extend northwards from the high chalk of the
Plain. It has no obvious centre, and its houses are
rather scattered and hidden from one another by
groups of trees and the contour of the ground.
Along the main road which forms the southern part
of the village are several cottages and the 19th-century vicarage. To the south of the road at the
east end of the village is a small group of cottages
at the foot of a lane leading to the downs. It was
called Little London in 1773 and 1811; (fn. 10) its
present name of the City was in use by 1886. (fn. 11) The
church and the site of the monastery lie slightly
away from the village to the north-east. (fn. 12) Most
houses lie along the minor road leading towards
Trowbridge and lanes which lead from it to the
north and south. They include several timber-framed houses. The house now called Old Manor
Farmhouse consists of a principal timber-framed
range which has been built up in stone at both
gable ends to accommodate chimneys; there is a
small projecting gabled wing to the front, and the
whole house is thatched. Manor Farm nearby is a
large house of brick built to replace a house
which in 1842 stood near the present entrance
to its drive. (fn. 13) Parsonage Farm is an L-shaped
timber-framed house, probably of the 17th
century, and there are several cottages of
about the same period in different parts of the
village. Of several brick houses of the 18th and 19th
centuries, the Grange is a good example. It is of
two stories with stone dressings, mullioned and
transomed windows, and a central first floor window with twin arched lights. The date 1750 is
scratched on the brickwork, and the back was
probably added in 1773. (fn. 14)
Tinhead lies about ¼ mile east of Edington, and
the villages have been joined by a small council
housing scheme on a road north of, and parallel to the
main road which joins them. The Lamb Inn and the
school lie on this main road, but most of the houses
in Tinhead lie along a minor road leading northward
towards Steeple Ashton and smaller roads and
lanes which lead off it. The George Inn is an 18th-century building of brick, and was a stop for coaches
when they ran through the village. (fn. 15) Opposite,
Shore House has a central part of timber-framed
construction oversailing at first-floor level; it was
added to and altered in the 18th century. Beckett's
House appears originally to have consisted of a
timber-framed range with a projection at the rear,
perhaps of the mid-16th century. About 1600 a
stone range was built at the rear enclosing the
projecting timber-framed wing, and somewhat
later both ranges were extended to the south. The
house formerly contained some encaustic tiles,
which were thought to have come from the monastic buildings at Edington, and some panelling with
carved figures thought to be of c. 1600. (fn. 16) It still has
a decorated plaster ceiling and some fireplaces of
that period, and was evidently the home of a prosperous family, quite probably the Whitakers who
were opulent clothiers in the village. (fn. 17)
The only other centre of population in the parish
was the hamlet of West Coulston about a mile east
of Tinhead; it is a part of East Coulston geographically, and was included in the area transferred to
that parish in 1934. (fn. 18) The remainder of the parish
contains only isolated farms. Upper Baynton Farm,
near the site of the manor house of Baynton, is
midway between Tinhead and Coulston. In the
north of the parish are Lower Baynton, New Hurst,
Ivymill, and Housecroft Farms, and on the Plain,
West Down and South Down Farms. Baynton Hill
(formerly East Down) and Tinhead Hill Farms
were in the area transferred to East Coulston in
1934. (fn. 19)
The population of Edington parish was 834 in
1801, and had risen to 1,136 by 1841. From that
time it declined gradually to 714 in 1931. In 1951
the civil parish, reduced in area since 1934, had 579
inhabitants. (fn. 20)
Edington is accepted by most modern scholars as
the site of the battle of Ethandun in which Alfred
defeated the Danes under Guthram in 878. (fn. 21) The
Witan met there in 957. (fn. 22) In 1450, during Cade's
rebellion, William Aiscough, Bishop of Salisbury,
was taken from the church to the top of Edington
Hill by a mob, and there murdered. (fn. 23) In 1838 and
1839 small Chartist meetings at Tinhead were
addressed by William Carrier of Trowbridge. (fn. 24)
William of Edington, Bishop of Winchester from
1346 to 1366, holder of various offices in the royal
household, and founder of the house of Bonhommes
at Edington, was probably a younger son of the
leading family of the village. (fn. 25) William Wey, who
made two pilgrimages to Jerusalem in the 15th
century, settled in the monastery at Edington to
write an account of his travels. (fn. 26) Paul Bush, the
last Rector of Edington monastery, was afterwards
Bishop of Bristol from 1542 to 1554. (fn. 27)
MANORS AND LESSER ESTATES.
Edington
was part of the royal demesne in the 9th century,
and was left by Alfred to his wife Ealhswith. (fn. 28) In
968 Edgar granted it to Romsey Abbey (Hants), (fn. 29)
and the nuns held it in 1086. At that time they had
three under-tenants, William, Osmund, and Hervey
holding 4½, 4, and 2 hides respectively, while some
unnamed Englishmen held 5 hides and a virgate. (fn. 30)
In addition, a small manor of 1 hide was held
immediately of the king by Hervey of Wilton, a
royal official and probably the same Hervey as the
tenant of the nuns. (fn. 31) William, the holder of 4½
hides, was William Scudet, the king's cook, who
also held land in Westbury and Steeple Ashton.
Henry I confirmed William's 'restoration and
grant' to the nuns of the land he held of them. (fn. 32)
Romsey Abbey retained the lordship of the capital
manor until just before the Dissolution, but the
foundation of the religious house at Edington in
1351 (fn. 33) resulted in the creation of a mesne manor
held by it of the abbess. This manor was later
called EDINGTON RECTOR while the capital
manor was known as EDINGTON ROMSEY. (fn. 34)
The endowment of the house of Edington was at
first achieved by Bishop William of Edington
acquiring small parcels of land in Edington either
from the abbess or from her tenants. In 1351 for
instance, John of Edington, probably acting for his
brother William, bought of the abbess 2 houses and
2 virgates, a house and a virgate, which formerly
belonged to Walter Nichol, and a house, 2 water
mills, a virgate and certain meadow and pasture
which formerly belonged to William of Sweltenham. (fn. 35) Other similar purchases were made in the
following years, (fn. 36) and in this way the manor of
Edington Rector was built up.
Tinhead is first mentioned incidentally as a
personal name in 1190, when Philip 'de Tunhede'
paid a forest fine. (fn. 37) In 1256 Michael of Tinhead
bought land there of Asketil del Mareis, (fn. 38) and in
1275 John of Tinhead held 10 virgates there of the
Abbess of Romsey. (fn. 39) In 1329 3 houses and 4 carucates of land there and in Semington were settled on
another John of Tinhead, with remainder to his
daughter Maud. (fn. 40) She had apparently succeeded
him by c. 1355. (fn. 41) The estate, which was later known
as TINHEAD RECTOR, (fn. 42) is first referred to as
a manor in 1363, when Maud, widow of Robert
Selyman, knight, and probably the same as the
Maud referred to above, conveyed the reversion
of the manor of Tinhead after her death and that of
her son Robert, to John of Edington. (fn. 43) Part of the
manor was then said to be held of the king in chief
by the service of an axe called hache Daneys. It had
been so held since the Conquest by the ancestors of
John of Tinhead, and probably represents the onehide estate held by Hervey of Wilton in 1086. Of
the remainder of the manor, a messuage and 17
acres were held of the abbess as of her manor of
Edington, and a water mill of Richard Rous. (fn. 44) This
manor of Tinhead was granted by John of Edington
to his brother the bishop, and by him to the rector
and brethren of Edington. (fn. 45) What had been the
Romsey property in Tinhead was called TINHEAD
ROMSEY after the Dissolution, although it had
not been treated as a separate manor previously. (fn. 46)
In 1539 the Abbess of Romsey was given licence
to alienate the nunnery's lands in Edington and
Tinhead to Sir Thomas Seymour, afterwards Lord
Seymour of Sudeley. (fn. 47) In the same year the monastery of Edington was surrendered, (fn. 48) and in 1541 its
property in Edington and Tinhead was granted
to Sir Thomas Seymour. (fn. 49) On the attainder and
execution of Sir Thomas in 1549, the property there
formerly belonging to both houses reverted to the
Crown, and in the following year the whole was
granted to William Paulet, Earl of Wiltshire. (fn. 50) The
four manors of Edington Rector, Edington Romsey,
Tinhead Rector, and Tinhead Romsey descended
in the Paulet family, subsequently Marquesses of
Winchester (1551) and Dukes of Bolton (1689),
until 1768, when they were sold in pursuance of a
decree in a chancery suit which followed the death
of Charles, the fifth Duke (d. 1765). They were
bought by Peter Delmé, but no conveyance was
made to him. Accordingly in 1784 a private Act was
obtained to enable Delmé to convey the estate to
Joshua and Drummond Smith of Erlestoke Park. (fn. 51)
The subsequent descent of all four manors is the
same as that of Erlestoke manor. (fn. 52)
Before the Dissolution the manor farm of Edington Romsey had been leased to Meric ap Rice for
45 years from 1531. (fn. 53) He died c. 1544, (fn. 54) and was
probably succeeded by his son Edward Merrick. (fn. 55)
The Romsey manor farm is not heard of again. The
Edington Rector farm was in hand when the monastery of Edington was dissolved. (fn. 56) In 1540 the farm
and the site of the monastery were occupied by
William Popeley. (fn. 57) In 1550 the site and demesnes
were granted by the Crown for 41 years to Isabel,
widow of Sir Henry Baynton of Bromham
(d. 1544). (fn. 58) She married, as her second husband,
Sir James Stumpe, and at his death in 1563 he left
her the lease of the site of Edington and all his plate
in the house there. (fn. 59) She died in 1573, and was succeeded by her son Henry Baynton, who greatly
spoiled the house, so that, as the Marquess of
Winchester alleged, £1,000 would not repair it. (fn. 60)
By 1599 the house was occupied by William Jones
of Keevil. (fn. 61) In the previous year, however, the
Marquess of Winchester had leased the whole of
his Edington and Tinhead property to two of his
four illegitimate sons, for terms of 99 years. John
was granted the manors of Edington Romsey and
Tinhead Rector, and William the manors of
Edington Rector and Tinhead Romsey. (fn. 62) William
was living at Edington by 1603, (fn. 63) and evidently
until his death in 1629, when his estate was assigned
by his executors to Sir Edward Lewis of the Van
(Glam.), for the remainder of the term. (fn. 64) Sir Edward
was buried in Edington church in 1630, and his
widow, Lady Anne Beauchamp (so-called from her
earlier marriage to Sir Edward Seymour, Lord
Beauchamp) lived at the house until her death in
1664. She was succeeded by her son Richard
Lewis, who remained at Edington until c. 1694. (fn. 65)
The manors of Edington Romsey and Tinhead
Rector, which had been leased to John Paulet, were
in Richard Lewis's hands by 1665, (fn. 66) and it is
possible that the lease was purchased by his father
at the same time as that of the other manors. In
the 18th century, when the property had reverted
to the main branch of the Paulet family, Lord
Harry Paulet, later Duke of Bolton (d. 1759) lived
at Edington. (fn. 67) The house, which had been of
considerable size when Lady Anne Beauchamp
occupied it, (fn. 68) was largely demolished by Joshua
Smith in the late 18th century. (fn. 69) In 1798 the ruins
of the house still stood in well-kept gardens. (fn. 70) The
house now called the Priory must, however, have
been a part of it, for two rooms contain decorated
plaster ceilings of the 17th century. The exterior
of the house has been much altered at various
times, but some of the masonry may well date from
the late Middle Ages. The heavy buttressed wall
of the precinct, probably of the 14th century, also
remains, as does the square fish pond to the north.
Tinhead Court was included in the lease granted
to Isabel Baynton in 1550, for it was among the
property damaged by her son. (fn. 71) It was occupied by
Edward Carpenter in 1607, (fn. 72) and by Mrs. Wadman,
a member of the Imber family, in 1712. (fn. 73) In 1774
it was held by John Price as a copyhold of the manor
of Tinhead Romsey. (fn. 74) The house was demolished
in the early 19th century; it was moated and had
what was described as an 'ecclesiastical barn'. (fn. 75)
The court of the lord of Baynton was mentioned
in 1262. (fn. 76) In 1274 Maud Rous held two carucates
of land at Baynton of the Abbess of Romsey. (fn. 77)
In 1313 Sir John Rous renounced to the abbess
certain rights of presenting nuns at Romsey, which
his family had claimed on the grounds that it had
given the abbey Baynton and 'Brawthorne'. (fn. 78) The
manor of BAYNTON, first so called in 1735, (fn. 79)
descended in the Rous family of Imber to Sir John
Rous, who in 1414 settled it on his younger son
John. (fn. 80) In 1444 this John granted it to the rector
and brethren of Edington. (fn. 81) After the Dissolution
Baynton was granted to Sir Thomas Seymour and
forfeited on his attainder in the same was as Edington Rector. In 1557 it was granted by the Crown
to Thomas Gratwicke of Seaford (Suss.), and
Anselm Lambe of Coulston, (fn. 82) subject to a lease for
three lives granted to Stephen Oriel in 1533. (fn. 83)
Lambe died in 1559, apparently possessed of the whole
manor, leaving two infant daughters. Agnes married
Richard Burley of Potterne, and Joan married Henry
Danvers, and they received livery of the manor in
1576. (fn. 84) In 1579 Henry Danvers and his wife granted
a moiety of lands in Orcheston St. George, which
were parcel of the manor, (fn. 85) to Richard Burley and
his wife, receiving from them a grant of a moiety
of the manor of Baynton. (fn. 86) The significance of this
transaction is not clear, for Henry Danvers only held
a moiety at his death in 1580, (fn. 87) and so did his
eldest son John, an idiot from birth, when he died
in 1626. (fn. 88) Joan, widow of Henry Danvers, who later
married Hugh Jones, joined with her second son
Charles, in granting a lease of part of the manor
in 1620. (fn. 89) Charles succeeded his brother John,
and died in 1626, holding both moieties. He had
purchased one moiety and settled it on his wife
Mary for life. (fn. 90) It is not clear from whom he
obtained it, but it was perhaps from the Burleys;
Richard Burley had some interest in the manor in
1594. (fn. 91) In 1673 John Danvers, grandson of Charles,
sold the manor to John Long of Little Cheverell, (fn. 92)
to whom it was already mortgaged. (fn. 93) Long died
without issue in 1676, and left Baynton to his
nephew William, eldest son of his younger brother
William. The manor descended in the Long
family to William, the last male member of the
Baynton branch, who died without surviving issue
in 1807. He left his estates at the disposal of his
wife Mary, who died in 1822, leaving them to John
Long of Monkton Farleigh, younger son of Richard
Long of Rood Ashton, and a descendant of Thomas
Long of Little Cheverell, father of the original
purchaser. (fn. 94) The manor still belonged to John Long
in 1833, (fn. 95) but by 1842 the property in Baynton,
and probably the manorial rights, had been sold
to the Watson-Taylor family. (fn. 96) From the 16th
century the manor was often called Baynton and
West Coulston, but no evidence has been found of
a separate manor of West Coulston. (fn. 97) The manor
house of Baynton lay near the present Upper
Baynton Farm, where a most still exists. It was
destroyed by fire in 1796, and its name was given
to the house in Coulston to which the family
removed. (fn. 98)
The Mompesson family held a property in Edington and Tinhead which was sometimes referred to
as the manor of TINHEAD MOMPESSON. In
1499 Agnes Trye, widow of Drew Mompesson, held
land there of the Abbess of Romsey, which was
settled on her sons after her death. (fn. 99) Her son John
Mompesson held it in 1511. (fn. 1) In 1579 Thomas
Mompesson bought of William Brouncker of Erlestoke a capital messuage and farm in Tinhead, which
had formerly been occupied by John Catcott. (fn. 2) This
farm had belonged to Leonard Willoughby and
was leased by him to Catcott. (fn. 3) Henry Brouncker
had bought it of John Willoughby and others in
1563. (fn. 4) When Thomas Mompesson died in 1587 he
left his lands in Edington and Tinhead to his executors to be sold, (fn. 5) and a conveyance of all his lands
there to Jeffery Whitaker of Tinhead was made in
1588. (fn. 6) In spite of this, lands in Edington and Tinhead were among those settled on Thomas's son
Giles Mompesson in 1607. (fn. 7) It may be that only the
land acquired from Brouncker was in fact sold, for
'a barn called Catcutts' was owned by Henry
Whitaker of Tinhead in 1672. (fn. 8) But by 1626 what
had remained in the Mompesson family had also
been sold, for Sir William Paulet then held land
late Mompesson's of the manor of Edington
Romsey. (fn. 9)
In c. 1355 John Forstal held a messuage and a
carucate of land in Baynton of the Abbess of Romsey
at a rent of 14s. 11d. (fn. 10) In 1394 Simon Best of
'Cannings' held an estate formerly occupied by
Robert Forstal at the same rent, (fn. 11) and in 1519 the
same estate, described as formerly occupied by
John Best, was held by John Erley. (fn. 12) In 1603
Thomas Erneley died holding property in Coulston, (fn. 13) but by 1615 lands described in the same way
were held by John Lambe. (fn. 14) In 1626 Sir John
Lambe paid the rent of 14s. 11d. for lands late
Erneley's. (fn. 15)
ECONOMIC HISTORY.
In 1086 Edington was
assessed at 30 hides, of which 2 hides were in
demesne and 15 hides and 3 virgates held by tenants.
There was land for 35½ ploughs. Land for 7 ploughs
was in demesne with 10 serfs, while 21 villeins,
23 bordars, and 10 coliberts held land for 15
ploughs. There was pasture 1 league long and ½
league broad, 100 acres of meadow, and woodland
10 furlongs long and 5 broad. (fn. 16)
By the 14th century much of the abbess's land
had been granted to free tenants and their rents
formed an important part of the receipts of the
manor, amounting to over £24 in c.1350. (fn. 17) These
rents were paid not only for holdings in Edington,
Tinhead, Baynton, and Coulston, but also for lands
in Imber, North Bradley, Corton in Boyton, and
Wyke near Gillingham (Dors.). The total still
remained at just over £24 in 1511. (fn. 18) A rental of the
mid-14th century lists 28 bond tenants holding a
virgate each, 25 holding half virgates, 11 mondaymen, each holding an acre or two, and 20 cottagers. (fn. 19)
They paid rents, churchscot, and tallage amounting
in all to about £10, beside certain customary payments of wheat and poultry.
The chief place in the demesne farming of the
abbess's estate was occupied by sheep. In 1284
1,587 great fleeces and 365 lambs' fleeces were sold,
and over 1,600 sheep remained at the end of the
year. (fn. 20) In 1414 most of the clip was sent to Romsey
to be sold; 1,918 sheep and 385 lambs had been
sheared, and over 2,000 sheep remained. (fn. 21) In that
year 129 sheep were sold, 88 of them to the royal
household. In 1550 there were 1,051 wethers,
18 rams, 431 ewes, and 200 hoggets on the lands of
Edington Romsey. (fn. 22) Compared with this, other
livestock was unimportant. There were only 7 cows,
7 heifers, and 3 calves on the manor in 1284, (fn. 23) and
in 1414 no dairy stock was mentioned. Quantities
of butter and poultry were sent to Romsey in 1284. (fn. 24)
The rabbit warren of the manor was at Luccombe. (fn. 25) It was leased to Peter Frankeleyn in 1396
at a rent of 6s. 8d. and four pairs of rabbits a year. (fn. 26)
In 1284 58 oxen were kept. It is probable that at
this date some corn was sent to Romsey, for 170
horseshoes were provided for carthorses going
there. (fn. 27) In 1417 the abbess's wheat growing on
East Down was damaged by oxen belonging to the
farmer of Imber. (fn. 28) In the earlier 15th century, the
demesne arable was somewhat reduced, for two
or three acres were often attached to small customary tenements. (fn. 29)
In 1284 there were at least two granges, (fn. 30) and in
1396 a south fold and an east fold are mentioned. (fn. 31)
They may have been the same as the folds at South
Down and 'Brawthorne', which the reeve was
ordered to repair in 1413. (fn. 32) In 1502 there was a
common animal house on Sheependown. (fn. 33) The
common grazing for sheep lay on the downs in the
south of the parish; in 1550 the lord was said to
have common of pasture for 1,700 sheep on South
Down and Brawthorne Down. (fn. 34) The abbess's
tenants were often presented for overstocking. In
1429 Giles Serich and John Gouder had 480
sheep in the field of Edington, and Thomas Hayward 60, (fn. 35) and in 1502 the Rector of Edington had
300 sheep where he should only have had 160. (fn. 36)
Some of the arable lay on the downs, (fn. 37) and some in
'the Clay', which was the lower ground between
Edington and Bratton, near the present Fitzroy
Farm. (fn. 38) East Field and West Field are mentioned
in the late 13th century; references to strips in them
near Woodbridge and Sweltenham Water indicate
that they were on the low ground north of the
village. (fn. 39) The abbess had several closes of land in
the north of the parish, and autumn and winter
pasture on other land there, and the first crop of
hay of 40 acres of meadow in Normead and Inmead. (fn. 40) Normead, which is south-west of the
present New Hurst Farm, was apparently shared
with Steeple Ashton, for eight tenants of Steeple
Ashton had winter pasture there in return for
assistance at the sheep shearing at Edington. (fn. 41)
The manor of Edington Rector was valued at
£21 7s. 10d. in 1535, including 76s. 4d. profits from
the demesne. (fn. 42) A survey of c.1550 (fn. 43) shows that
parts of the demesne were let at over £16, but
several closes of meadow and pasture and 241 a.
arable were then in hand. The lord of the manor
had common for 600 sheep on three several downs
called Allondown, Sterte, and Talbots, and a
common down, called Hysorton Down, and in the
common fields, and for 140 ewes on Sheependown
and Western Down. He had winter common on
50 a. in the north of the parish, and the first crop
of hay of 28½ a. meadow in Normead and Inmead.
The arable of the rector and the tenants lay dispersed and mixed with that of Edington Romsey
in East Field and West Field and on Edington
Hill. Some tenants also held arable in the fields of
Tinhead and at Goldenham and Waddon there.
The survey noted that the tenants of Edington
and Tinhead had been forced by Sir Thomas
Seymour to exchange certain of their arable land
in the East Field for parts of the demesne arable
which were worth little or nothing. The tenants
had stinted common for cattle in Sharpcroft and
Sheepcroft, near the present Housecroft Farm, and
in the common fields. Common for sheep lay on
Sheependown and West Down, and common
meadow in Normead, Inmead, and Dotsmead.
When the manor of Tinhead was granted to the
Rector and Brethren of Edington in 1363, it consisted of buildings and a garden, a dovecote, 120 a.
of arable, half of which lay fallow each year, 10 a.
of meadow, several pasture for 24 oxen, and pasture
for sheep. Free tenants paid 20s. and there were
4 bond half-virgaters. In addition, there was a
house and a close of 16 a. at Feltham, near Ivymill
Farm, which were held of the abbess, and a water
mill held of Richard Rous. (fn. 44) At the Dissolution the
manor of Tinhead Rector was valued at £21 6s.
11d. (fn. 45) In the survey of c. 1550. (fn. 46) no demesne is
listed separately for Tinhead, the whole of the
demesne of the Bonhommes being listed with their
Edington manor. There were twelve customary
tenants, who had stinted common for cattle in
Redyate, which lay near the present New Hurst
Farm. (fn. 47)
There is little evidence for the state of agriculture
in Edington in the 17th century. In 1686 the demesnes of all the Edington and Tinhead manors
were leased out to tenants by Richard Lewis, the
lessee under the Paulets. The future pattern of
farming in the parish was already evolving, for
several of the holdings must have been large. John
Hooper rented South Down arable and sheepsleight, and other land at £268 10s. a year, Richard
Browne certain lands at £225 a year, and East
Down sheepsleight and arable were let for £180 a
year. With the tithes, which were leased at £180, the
total rental of the demesne came to over £1,400,
while the customary rents ('olds rent') came to
about £62. (fn. 48) The regular income which the copyhold lands provided was therefore negligible compared with the rents of the demesne, but they still
no doubt yielded an intermittent return from fines
paid for renewal of copies.
The arable of Edington continued in open fields
until at least 1842. (fn. 49) In 1702 it was ordered that
one field should be fallow every three years. The
fields were then Edington Clay, Edington Hill, and
Pixell, or Pigshill, or Pattenstone Piece Field. (fn. 50)
The Clay was on the rising ground between the
Bratton boundary and Edington Hill, near Fitzroy
Farm. Pixell Field was near Patcombe Hill. (fn. 51) Some
other arable which was to conform to the three-year course lay at the Byes and Behind Hayes. This
may have been on the lower ground, perhaps near
Woodbridge, where there was inclosed arable in
1774. (fn. 52) Customary tenants had common for their
sheep with the common flock; one holding was
allowed 12 sheep one year and 24 the next, another
4 one year and 8 the next, and others in the same
proportion. (fn. 53) In 1712 it was said that the parson,
apparently meaning the lessee of the tithes, should
provide a bull and a boar for the use of the parish. (fn. 54)
The custom of the manor was copies for three lives,
with the wife of each successive life holding for her
widowhood. (fn. 55)
Tinhead arable in 1842 lay on the hill at Goldenham, which lay between Edington Hill and Long
Hollow, and at Tinhead Clay, between Salisbury
Hollow and the road to Coulston. (fn. 56) Tinhead Lowfield was mentioned in 1705, when some arable
there had lately been inclosed. (fn. 57) Tenants of the
two Tinhead manors had common in Tinhead Cowleaze in the proportion one cow to five sheep. Thus
John Price's copyhold in 1755 had common there
for 5 cows and 25 sheep, and Betty Rogers's for
4 beasts and 20 sheep in 1774. (fn. 58) In 1700 it was
presented as the custom to have two bulls and a
boar there, provided by the owner of the
parsonage. (fn. 59)
In the 18th century the Bolton property included several large farms which were no doubt
let at rack rents. (fn. 60) South Down Farm and sheepsleight which included a considerable amount of
inclosed land about Edington village and the tithes
arising from the farm were leased in 1702 for nine
years at £400 a year. (fn. 61) In 1784 Hurst, South Down,
Housecroft, Ivymill, Parsonage, Ballard's, Bartley's,
Shores, and East Down farms were all of over 100
acres. The copyhold and lands let on long leases
amounted to about 700 a. By 1835 no copyholds
remained, and the Watson-Taylor property, called
the manor of Edington, consisted chiefly of large
farms held on yearly tenancies at rack rents. In
that year 13 farms were let at over £100 a year each,
including 5 over £400 and another 3 over £300. All
rents, including cowleazes, cottages, and allotments,
totalled over £4,750. (fn. 62) Further consolidation of
holdings had taken place by 1851, when the decline
in population of the parish was attributed to the
'incorporation' of several small farms. (fn. 63) The common fields were never inclosed by Act of Parliament.
It was probably unnecessary to obtain one owing
to the large proportion of the parish owned by
the Watson-Taylor family, for in 1842 the family
owned 4,819 a. out of a total of 5,709. (fn. 64) After the
extinction of the copyholds the rights of pasture
which had belonged to them were treated as
separate pieces of property. In 1823 404 sheep
leazes in Edington were occupied by 17 people, and
440 in Tinhead by 6 people. Sixty-five cowleazes in
Tinhead Cowleaze were owned by 6 people; of
these, Simon Watson-Taylor held 50, which he let
to the poor. (fn. 65) Each cowleaze was let at 32s. a year
in 1835. (fn. 66) The Cowleaze was inclosed in 1865.
when Simon Watson-Taylor owned 69 out of 70
leazes. (fn. 67)
The manor of Baynton was valued at £15 18s. 8d.
in 1535. (fn. 68) Of this, 66s. 8d. was the value of two
closes in the hands of the Bonhommes, and the rest
was the tenants, rents. In 1557 the farm of the site of
the manor and the lands belonging to it, which were
leased on three lives, was worth £8 3s. 4d., rents
of free and customary tenants 65s. 11d., and perquisites of courts 2s. 4d. A tenement in Orcheston
St. George, which belonged to the manor, was
leased for 60 years at 53s. 4d. a year. (fn. 69) A survey of
c. 1673 shows that little of the manor was in hand
except for 13 a. of woods and 20 a. of land sown
with cinqfoil. The chief income of the manor came
from the rack rents of three farms. Two of these, of
80 and 120 a. respectively, lay entirely in the low
inclosed grounds around Baynton and north of it,
while the third, of 120 a. included 90 a. of 'land to
be sown yearly', which probably lay on the hill, and
pasture for 850 sheep. The total of the rack rents
of these farms and some smaller parcels was just
over £400. Five small holdings were leased on lives.
The timber on the estate was worth £1,000. (fn. 70) By
the end of the 18th century the property consisted
of three farms: Baynton, the present Upper Baynton Farm, of over 500 a.; Baynton Dairy, the present
Lower Baynton Farm, of 140 a.; and Baynton
Lower Dairy, which lay in the north of the parish
near the present Stokes Marsh Farm. (fn. 71)
The woollen industry first came to Edington, as
it did to neighbouring villages, to take advantage of
the water power the Stradbrook afforded for the
fulling of cloth. A tucking mill is first mentioned in
Edington in the mid-14th century. (fn. 72) In 1427
Richard Tucker held a fulling mill of the Rector of
Edington, (fn. 73) and in 1519 one Whitaker, a clothier of
Westbury, had lately built a mill called New Mill. (fn. 74)
These were no doubt the two fulling mills which
belonged to Edington Rector manor c. 1550, one
held by John Whitaker, and one by Andrew
Michell and John Adlam. (fn. 75) Toward the end of the
century the Whitakers were the most important
clothiers in Edington. Jeffery Whitaker of Tinhead,
'clothman', left to his son, Nash, the business of his
mill at Bratton, with New Mill in Edington and
Langham Mill in North Bradley. His legacies
totalled about £3,000. (fn. 76) Nash Whitaker, also of
Tinhead, died in 1610, leaving his mill at Bratton
and his best cloth-mark, called the yellow cross, to
his son Jeffery. (fn. 77) This Jeffery was described as a
clothier of Westbury in 1613, when he conveyed
property at Edington to Sir William Paulet, (fn. 78) but
as a gentleman at his death in 1625, when he left
property in Edington and Steeple Ashton to his
uncle Jeffery. (fn. 79) Other clothiers in the late 16th
century were Robert and William Blackborrow,
who were both fined for defective white cloth,
Robert in 1561 and William in 1563. (fn. 80) Robert, who
was of Tinhead, died in 1578. (fn. 81) In that year
Thomas Adlam, tucker, and Henry Noble, weaver,
lived at Edington. (fn. 82) In the next century Stephen
Gawen (fl. c. 1630), Abel Gawen (c. 1630), another
Abel Gawen (c. 1664), and John Pryor (c. 1675)
were all clothiers, the Gawens at Tinhead and Pryor
at Edington. (fn. 83) Henry Spender of Baynton (d. c.
1621) was a weaver. (fn. 84) John Pryor took a copyhold
estate in a fulling mill in 1703, (fn. 85) but no later
reference to the industry in Edington has been found.
A limekiln stood at the top of Salisbury Hollow
above Tinhead in 1817. (fn. 86) It was occupied by Mrs.
Jane Boulter in 1857, (fn. 87) and was still standing in
1889, but had been demolished by 1901. (fn. 88)
MILLS.
In 1086 there were two mills at Edington
paying 19s. (fn. 89) By the mid-14th century there were
at least four; two were held by Agatha and Sybil
Palmer and two by William of Sweltenham. There
was then a tucking mill in Edington, probably one
of these four. (fn. 90) The two water mills of William of
Sweltenham were acquired by William of Edington
and granted to the Rector of Edington in 1351, (fn. 91) and
a water mill which was charged with a payment of
10s. yearly to John Palmer was granted by Nicholas
de Bonham and others to the rector in 1373. (fn. 92)
Another water mill was granted to the rector with
the manor of Tinhead in 1363. It was held of Richard Rous of Baynton, who was bound to supply
timber for its repair, but it was then wholly in
decay. (fn. 93) Rous's release to the rector indicates that
it was near the Leaze in Tinhead. (fn. 94) In c. 1550 three
mills were appurtenant to the manor of Edington
Rector. (fn. 95) Of these, Sweltenham grist mill was no
doubt one of the two conveyed to the rector in
1351, and an unnamed fulling mill was probably
one of the others which had belonged to the manor
since the 14th century. The third, a fulling mill
called New Mill, was described as lately built in
1519. (fn. 96) There are indications that Sweltenham Mill
lay on the site of the present Ivy Mill, which is first
so named in 1720. (fn. 97) By the later part of the century
Ivy Mill, or Mill Farm, had over 100 acres of land
attached to it, (fn. 98) and has remained primarily a farm
until the present time. In 1921 the three-stoned
mill had been recently repaired at great expense, (fn. 99)
and it remained in use until after the Second World
War. The mill building is of three stories, the lowest
of stone and the upper two timber-framed. It
appears to have been a dwelling house probably
dating from the 15th century, which was later
converted into a mill. It retains on the ground
floor a pointed stone entrance doorway, and has
three bays of an open timber roof which shows
signs of smoke-blackening. It may have belonged
to a first-floor hall. To provide sufficient power the
small stream was turned into a banked-up mill
pond which gave an eventual fall of 12ft. and turned
an overshot wheel of 5 h.p. Much of the mill's
machinery remained in 1963. The brick house adjoining the mill was rebuilt in the mid-19th
century after a fire. (fn. 1)
The fulling mill of c. 1550, which was unnamed,
probably stood on the site of the present Hudd's
Mill. A grain and fulling mill called Mead Mill,
which was parcel of the manor of Edington Rector,
was occupied by William Hudd in 1711. (fn. 2) It was
called Edington Mill in 1773 (fn. 3) and continued to
work as a corn mill until the late 19th century. The
building, apparently of the 18th century, was in 1963
used as a farm building. It was powered by an
overshot wheel of about 12 ft. diameter, fed from
a pond into which the water ran through a highbanked leat. The extent of the earthworks needed
to provide power both at Ivy Mill and Hudd's
Mill, is remarkable.
New Mill stood on the upper side of Woodbridge on the road from Edington to West Ashton,
where the outline of the mill pond can still be traced.
It is last mentioned in the will of Jeffery Whitaker in
1601, (fn. 4) and no doubt fell into decay with the decline
of the cloth industry in the district.
FAIR AND MARKET.
A fair belonged to the
manor of Edington Romsey c. 1550. It was held on
Relic Sunday, (fn. 5) and the profit, which did not amount
to 4d. a year, went to the reeve. (fn. 6) It was still held in
the years before the First World War, on a Monday
early in July, but was then entirely recreational. A
feast was held on the previous day. (fn. 7) A market at
Edington was being held in 1433, when a Warminster shoemaker took a life estate in an empty
plot in the market of Edington next to the stall of
Robert Letecombe. (fn. 8) Shambles are mentioned in
1511, (fn. 9) and in 1529 William Richards held one under
the wall of the manor. (fn. 10) John Smyth alias Butcher
held a shop called a shamble in 1539. (fn. 11) No reference
to a market later than this has been found.
CHURCH.
There was a parson of Edington in
1225 (fn. 12) A church is first mentioned in 1241, when
it was awarded to John of Romsey, Rector of
Edington, together with the chapel of Bradley, and
tithes which had been disputed in Baynton, Tinhead, and Coulston. (fn. 13) There is little doubt that
Romsey Abbey had held the church since before
the Conquest, although no church is mentioned in
Edgar's charter. (fn. 14) In 1241, and probably for many
years previously, the church at Edington was a
prebend of Romsey Abbey, and the rector acted,
nominally, as a chaplain to the nuns, being represented at Edington by a vicar. When in 1351
William of Edington founded his chantry at Edington, the rector of the church resigned, and his place
was taken by the first warden of the chantry. At
the same time the abbess transferred the advowson
to William of Edington, and agreed that the warden
should be a canon of her house in place of the former
rector. In 1358 the chantry was converted into a
religious house, the head of which was called the
rector. (fn. 15) From this time until the Dissolution the
monastic church served as a parish church for
Edington, and it was laid down in the foundation
charter that two secular priests should minister to
the parishioners in the nave. (fn. 16)
North Bradley was a chapelry of Edington at
least as early as 1241. (fn. 17) The prebendaries of Edington appointed vicars to serve there, and after 1351,
when the advowson of the chapel was granted to
the chantry, the warden, and later the Rector of
the Bonhommes of Edington, continued to do so
until the Dissolution. (fn. 18) In the later Middle Ages
North Bradley was usually referred to as a vicarage,
and its subordination to the church of Edington
was probably forgotten. After the Dissolution the
advowson was granted separately from that of
Edington, and North Bradley has since been regarded as a separate parish. (fn. 19) Baynton was also a
chapelry of Edington, but the church there had
fallen out of use by the 16th century (see below).
Since 1939, when Imber was taken over by the
War Department, the spiritualities of that parish
have been served from Edington. (fn. 20)
The church of Edington was appropriated to the
chantry at its foundation in 1351, (fn. 21) and as the parish
was served by priests from the monastery itself,
both great and small tithes were presumably taken
by the latter. After the Dissolution the rectory and
church were granted with the monastery's property, (fn. 22) and descended in the same way until 1910,
when the patronage of the living was transferred to
the Bishop of Salisbury. (fn. 23) The tithes were wholly
impropriate, and the cure was served by a perpetual curate appointed by the lay rector. (fn. 24)
In 1291 the rectory of Edington with its chapel of
Bradley was assessed at £33 6s. 8d., and the vicarage of Edington at a further £6 13s. 4d. (fn. 25) In 1341
the rector had a house and garden and a carucate
of land in demesne, and tithes, offerings, and rents
which amounted in all to £43 9s. (fn. 26) At the Dissolution the rectory was valued at £43 18d. 2d. (fn. 27) In
1561 it was charged with £7 6s. 8d., for the stipends
of two curates. (fn. 28) In 1770 the curate was paid £30
a year out of the issues of the manor. (fn. 29) The benefice was augmented by Queen Anne's Bounty in
1809, 1813, and 1823, (fn. 30) and by 1831 the average
net income was £87 with a house. (fn. 31) In 1842 the
tithes were commuted for £1,300, the whole being
allotted to the lay rector. (fn. 32) In 1882 the benefice was
endowed with £48 a year, and a house provided
for the vicar. (fn. 33)
Apart from William of Edington's chantry of
1351, which was afterwards converted into the
house of Bonhommes, nothing is known of any
chantries in the church. A chapel of St. Ethelfleda
is mentioned in 1358, when the Abbess of Romsey
received land near it from John of Edington, (fn. 34) but
it seems likely that it was separate from the church.
In 1413 the reeve of Edington gave two geese to
the chaplain celebrating mass there on St. Ethelfleda's day. (fn. 35) Leland saw a chapel with a hermitage
at the site of Bishop Aiscough's murder, (fn. 36) but
nothing more is known about it. (fn. 37) A shop and a
house belonged to the church in 1604. (fn. 38) The church
house stood just north of the church in the field
on the west of the road. (fn. 39)
The prebendaries who held the rectory of
Edington before 1351 were nominally chaplains to
the nuns at Romsey, but since several of them held
other preferments, (fn. 40) it is almost certain that they
did not reside either at Edington or Romsey. Little
is known about the vicars whom they appointed,
but in 1314 William, Vicar of Edington, promised
to abstain from further connexion with Edith Harlot
and four other women, (fn. 41) and in 1351 it was said
that the church was neglected. (fn. 42) In 1428 six
parishioners appeared before the bishop charged
with having assembled at the cross at Tinhead and
pledged themselves not to offer more than 1d. for
weddings, churchings, and burials. (fn. 43) During the
18th century the curate is said to have acted as
domestic chaplain to the lords of the manor, having
a horse and servant found and table at the house. (fn. 44)
In 1783, however, when the lords were absentees,
the curate lived at Charlton beyond Devizes. He
also held the curacy of Erlestoke, and held services
at Edington once each Sunday, alternately morning
and afternoon. As he wrote, the stipend was 'by
no means a proper support for more duty'. (fn. 45) In
1812 lateness or irregularity of service was complained of. (fn. 46) At that time the curate was William
Roots, who had licence to reside at Warminster. (fn. 47)
The church of ST. MARY THE VIRGIN, ST.
KATHARINE AND ALL SAINTS
(fn. 48) was built at
the foundation of the house of Bonhommes, and
dedicated by the Bishop of Salisbury in 1361. (fn. 49) It
replaced a church of which remains, of late Norman,
character, of part of the south arcade, were found
during the 19th-century restoration. (fn. 50) The present
church consists of a clerestoried nave with aisles,
north and south transepts, chancel, tower at the
crossing, and south porch of three stories. Apart
from the porch, which was added in the 15th
century, the whole is of the mid-14th century, and
is a good example of the transition from the
Decorated to the Perpendicular style. This can be
seen in the windows of the transepts and the side
windows of the chancel, which have a form
of reticulated tracery in which the vertical
members have become straight instead of flowing.
The east and west windows of the church show
the same merging of the styles, but the west windows of the aisles and the tower windows only have
Decorated tracery. Externally the church is embattled, but only the chancel and the east walls of
the transepts are decorated with crocketed pinnacles. Inside, the chancel is richly decorated, with
a pair of niches in the east wall flanking the window,
a pair in the eastern corners, and a pair between
the side windows. In two of them are headless
figures. The carving of the niches, and of the corbels and other details thoughout the church, is
exceptionally delicate and vigorous. The nave and
transepts have ceilings of the 17th century, of pink
and white plaster; that in the north transept is dated
1663. The chancel ceiling is of c. 1789, when it was
built by Joshua Smith to replace the original one
of stone. (fn. 51)
In the south transept is a large altar tomb with
a recumbent figure of an ecclesiastic under a
canopy. The whole is coloured and decorated with
a rebus of a branch or sprig issuing from a barrel.
The feet of the effigy rest on a barrel with the
initials J.B. or T.B., but its identity has never been
certainly established. (fn. 52) In one of the arches on the
south side of the nave is a small chapel, consisting
of a canopied altar tomb with space for a priest
to kneel at one end. Brasses of a man and wife are
missing, but the coats of arms of Cheyney and
Pavely, and the Pavely badge of a rudder, make it
probable that it commemorates Sir Ralph Cheyney
(d. c. 1401) and his wife Joan, a coheir of Sir John
Pavely of Brook. (fn. 53) On the south side of the chancel
is a large marble and alabaster tomb with effigies
of Sir Edward Lewis (d. 1630) and his wife Lady
Anne Beauchamp (d. 1664). The kneeling children
on this monument may have inspired the sculptor
of a mural tablet to the Tayler family in the north
aisle, on which is a group of kneeling figures in
19th-century dress. On the north side of the chancel
is a monument to Sir Simon Taylor (d. 1815) by
Sir Francis Chantrey. There are many other monuments from the 17th century onwards.
The chancel screen or pulpitum is of the early
16th century, much restored. The spiked altar
rails, pulpit with tester, and oak reredos in the
north transept (furnished as a Lady Chapel) are
all of the 17th century. The bowl of the black marble
font dating from c. 1890 rests on a medieval stem.
The wooden cover is dated 1626. In the south
transept are the remains of a font probably of the
13th century. (fn. 54) There are considerable remains of
medieval stained glass. In the north transept are a
crucifixion and angels playing a lute and an organ;
in the north aisle patterned glass with heraldic borders, and in the north clerestory windows are figures
of saints. A Scudamore organ built by Nelson Hall
of Warminster was placed in the church in 1860 in
the hope that the congregation would join in the
singing. It was replaced by the present organ, by
Jones of Kensington, in 1901, and subsequently
taken to Tilshead church. (fn. 55)
In the south aisle are two recumbent figures of
the 14th century, a royal achievement of arms dated
1639, and a few fragments of old glass, all of which
were removed from Imber church. (fn. 56)
There were four bells and a sanctus bell in 1553.
There are now six bells and a sanctus bell; the
earliest are the first, of 1640, and the fifth, of 1647. (fn. 57)
The clock, which has no dial, is of the 16th century,
though altered later. The commissioners of Edward
VI left a chalice of 9 oz., and took away 15 oz. of
silver. The present chalice, with paten on foot, is
hall-marked 1738, and there is a pewter flagon and
three plates. (fn. 58) The registers of burials begin in 1678,
and of baptism and marriages in 1695. Baptisms
and burials from 1789 to 1812 are missing. (fn. 59)
In 1812 it was said that the church was in good
order, (fn. 60) but in 1857 it was described as a picture of
decay and neglect. The floor was 'a chaotic plateau,
with traces of stolen brasses and ruptured inscriptions,' the walls were 'green and dank', and 'a huge
oven, similar to a brewing vat', heated the church. (fn. 61)
It was restored in 1889-91 by C. E. Ponting.
A chapel at Baynton is first mentioned in 1225,
when Walter of Baynton objected because the Abbot
of Hyde had heard a case about the advowson in an
ecclesiastical court. (fn. 62) The presentation went with
the manor of Baynton, the first recorded patron
being Sir John Rous in 1310. (fn. 63) The chapel was
spoken of as a rectory and the incumbent claimed
some tithes. In 1339 there was a dispute over
tithes between the Rector of Baynton, backed by
John Rous, and the Prebendary of Edington. There
was an affray in Baynton Field in which a man was
killed. (fn. 64) The sheriff was ordered to proclaim against
unlawful assemblies, and to allow the prebendary
to collect the tithes belonging to him there. In the
event, however, the sheriff took the rector's side,
and imprisoned the prebendary's collectors, because, it was alleged, the under-sheriff was allied
to the rector. (fn. 65) In 1351 Thomas, rector of the chapel,
acknowledged that he had unjustly received the
great tithes of two acres on 'Langehull' since
1341. (fn. 66) In 1361 the Bonhommes were awarded
tithes worth 20 marks, and in return granted the
Rector of Baynton an acre of meadow and all the
rest of the tithes within the bounds of Baynton. (fn. 67)
In 1363 Richard Rous gave 40s. yearly from his
lands in Westbury Leigh for the maintenance of
the rector and his successors. (fn. 68)
The advowson of Baynton was granted with the
manor to the Bonhommes in 1444. (fn. 69) It seems that
the chapel was allowed to decay, although a rector
is mentioned as late as the reign of Edward IV. (fn. 70)
In 1589 the decayed chapel of St. Katherine, or
Our Lady, at Baynton was granted by the Crown
to Charles Bagehott and Bartholomew Yardley, (fn. 71)
but no further mention of it has been found. It is
thought to have been near old Baynton House, in
a field called Chapel Close. Near this site a copper
signaculum, marked with the Virgin Mary and a
chalice, was found in the 19th century. (fn. 72)
NONCONFORMITY.
There were six Protestant
nonconformists and one Papist at Edington in
1676. (fn. 73) Edward Froude of Edington, who was
presented as an Anabaptist preacher in 1674, 1683,
and 1686, was closely connected with the Baptist
conventicle at Erlestoke, (fn. 74) but no organized dissenting church existed at Edington until over a
century later. In 1794 a building at Tinhead, which
had formerly been a malthouse, was registered as a
place of worship. (fn. 75) No denomination was then
stated, but from this congregation probably descended the Baptists who were meeting in the same
building in 1851. (fn. 76) There is little doubt that they
had been founded from the chapel at Bratton, for
in later years the Tinhead chapel was a station of the
Bratton one. (fn. 77) It closed c. 1897, when the lease of
the building expired. (fn. 78)
Methodist meetings in Tinhead were being held
in a cottage c. 1787. (fn. 79) James Rogers, minister of
the Bradford Circuit, 1795-6, was probably the
first travelling preacher to visit the village. In 1800
a coachhouse in 'Potters Barton' was made into a
chapel and leased to the congregation, but in 1827
the lease of the building fell in, and, because of the
hostility of the owner's steward, could not be renewed. Meetings were again held in a cottage, but
in 1828, through the efforts of Virtue Morgan and
her husband, a chapel was built at the lower end of
Coach Hollow in Tinhead. In the following year
there were 26 members. (fn. 80) The chapel was enlarged
in 1848 so that it contained 360 sittings, (fn. 81) and in
1851 the average Sunday evening congregation
was 350. (fn. 82) In 1857 there were 38 members under
3 leaders, (fn. 83) and in 1898 the number was 41. (fn. 84) In
1904 the chapel was practically rebuilt. (fn. 85)
In 1893 James Newman left £100 to be invested
to pay 10s. a year to augment the quarterly collection at the Methodist Chapel, 10s. a year for the
Sunday School, and the rest of the income for the
benefit of local preachers. Since most of the preachers then came from a distance, the fund was used
towards their expenses in stabling their horses at
the village inn and the refreshment of their drivers. (fn. 86)
A house in Tinhead was licensed for a congregation of Independents in 1791, but no other reference
to it has been found. (fn. 87)
PARISH GOVERNMENT.
In 1577 two churchwardens were chosen for Edington, and two churchmen for each of the tithings of Edington and Tinhead. Churchmen were last chosen in 1583; in the
following year two assistant churchwardens and two
collectors for the poor were chosen. The assistant
churchwardens soon ceased to be appointed, but the
collectors for the poor continued until 1611, when
they were replaced by one overseer for each of the
three tithings of Edington, Tinhead, and Baynton.
During the period covered by the early churchwardens' account book (1577-1625), the parish
had a stock of a few cattle and sheep which were
let out at yearly rents. In 1604 the church shop and
house were leased. (fn. 88) The parish bought two cottages in 1809, and also owned one in Tinhead; these
were leased to tenants. (fn. 89)
Four volumes of overseers' accounts remain for
the period 1806-34. It was the custom to appoint
two overseers. In 1822 the vestry appointed a
clerk to assist them with their accounts and in
other ways, at a salary of £10 a year, which had
increased to £20 by 1831. In that year the vestry
ordered the overseers to call a vestry each month
to hear the complaints of the poor, but no record
of any such meetings remains. The average annual
expenditure on the poor over five yearly periods
rose from £685 in 1807-11, to £827 in 1822-6,
while for the seven years 1827-34 it averaged
£950.
Throughout the period covered by the books
many of the weekly payments made were small
sums in aid of wages, and it was a regular practice
to pay, or make an advance toward, rents and costs
of clothing and bedding. Other payments were
made to buy tools, to assist families to move away
from the parish to obtain work, and for repairs to
houses. Heavy unemployment in 1830 forced the
parish to adopt the labour rate system. Two men
were to be employed for every 50 a. of arable land and
one for every 50 a. of pasture except on the downs.
The remainder of the poor were to be employed
on the parish roads. In 1833 the vestry ordered that
the system was to apply each year from 29 November to 25 March. (fn. 90)
In 1577 two waymen were chosen for each of the
three tithings of Edington, Tinhead, and Baynton
and Coulston, but in later years only one was usually
chosen for Baynton and Coulston. (fn. 91) In 1736 Edington and Tinhead were still maintaining their highways separately. (fn. 92) A highway account book for
Edington tithing, 1809-27, is in the church chest.
SCHOOLS.
In 1808 10 girls were educated and
clothed at the expense of the lord of the manor,
and about 30 more were paid for by their parents. (fn. 93)
In 1819 there were two day schools, one for boys
and one for girls, each containing about 20 pupils,
and the curate stated that the poor were 'not in
want of the means of education'. (fn. 94) In 1835 there
were three infants' schools in the parish, providing
education for 44 children of both sexes at the
expense of their parents. (fn. 95) One of these may have
been at West Coulston. (fn. 96) In 1859 40-50 girls were
taught to read and sew, but not to write, in a
cottage room 15 ft. square, by a mistress of doubtful competence. The Edington boys, and boys and
girls from Tinhead, went to the schools at Bratton. (fn. 97)
Edington and East Coulston were made a United
District and a School Board formed in 1875, (fn. 98) and
a school was built at Tinhead in 1877. (fn. 99) In 1894
there was accommodation for 124 pupils at the
Board's mixed school and the average attendance
was 119. (fn. 1) By 1938 the school was used for juniormixed and infants only, and average attendance
had dropped to 49. (fn. 2)
CHARITIES.
By his will proved in 1640 William
Tubb left £50 to the poor of the parish. (fn. 3) The
money was invested in land c. 1715. In 1833 the
property lay in Steeple Ashton; at that time the
rent of £3 15s. was accumulated for several years
and then distributed equally among all the poor
who had not been relieved by the parish during
the last year. (fn. 4) The charity is still administered in
much the same way; since 1894 recipients have
been chosen by trustees appointed by the parish
council. (fn. 5) Income in 1952 was £3. (fn. 6)
In 1852 George Tayler left £3,000 to be invested
for charitable purposes, differing slightly from
parish to parish, in Edington, Steeple Ashton,
Keevil, and Poulshot. At Edington the provision
of bread, the preaching of an annual childrens'
sermon by the vicar, and the distribution of cakes
to the children were the same as in Poulshot. (fn. 7) In
addition, at Edington the Methodist minister was
to have 10s. for a similar sermon, and his Sunday
School was also to have cakes, and provision was
made for the upkeep of the Tayler monuments in
Edington church. (fn. 8) After the death of Tayler's
administrator in 1906, the charity was divided into
five parts, one for each parish and a separate educational foundation. The Edington charity was
allotted £527 10s. stock, and with its proceeds the
original objects of the charity are still carried out. (fn. 9)
Income in 1951 was £14 16s. (fn. 10)
The Revd. Samuel Littlewood, curate of Edington, by his will proved in 1884, left £50 to be invested to supply Bibles and prayer books to poor
parishioners who were over 50 years old and members of the Church of England. (fn. 11) The charity is
still administered for this purpose. (fn. 12)