| 15 Nov 1622 |
| Entry | H, apothecary, confessed that he had given 15 pills of masticine to Robert Roe, lawyer, but said that Dr Rhead had approved them. Roe had been over-purged by the pills, had wondered whether to summon Dr Argent, & had died of dysentery and haemorrhoids. Poisoning suspected. The Censors could not prove anything against H because H was bound in a higher court. |
| Action taken | Deferred. |
| Number of crimes | 1 |
| 8 June 1632 |
| Entry | H appeared, accused of treating John Smith for a bladder ulcer by giving him 'mercurial medicaments' for salivation, then a purge &c. H confessed and was warned. |
| Attitude of the accused | confessed |
| Action taken | Warned. |
| Verdict | guilty |
| Sentence | Warned |
| Number of crimes | 1 |
| 2 May 1634 |
| Entry | It was reported that H had treated a patient under two bills of Dr Read for £10. |
| Attitude of the accused | absent |
| Action taken | ? |
| Verdict | case not completed |
| Number of crimes | 1 |
| 4 July 1634 |
| Entry | [Apothbiz.] Apossecary. |
| 28 Aug 1634 |
| Entry | Luke Fawnes, brother of Zachary Fawnes, said that H had given Lac Sulphuris to ZF for 5s. and that on taking the third dose ZF had fallen into a fever and had eventually died. Dr Alston corroborated F's account. |
| Initiator of the complaint | relative of the patient |
| Second initiator of the complaint | college member |
| Action taken | See next. |
| Number of crimes | 1 |
| 30 Aug 1634 |
| Entry | H appeared and confessed to having given Lac Sulphuris, but said that it was not intended as physic. |
| Action taken | Fined £20 and imprisoned in Newgate. |
| Verdict | guilty |
| Sentence | Fined £20 and imprisoned in Newgate |
| Number of crimes | 1 |
| 1 Sep 1634 |
| Entry | 'Wheras Mr. Haughton pretends hee is to furnishe Chests for some shipps, Mr. President doth think fitt, that those Chests should bee searched: as also the East India Companye are to bee informed that itt is fitt, that their Chests which they send with phisicke and Surgerye stuffe should bee searched by the Censors.' |
| Action taken | Chests of medicaments provided by H to be searched. |
| 30 Sep 1634 |
| Entry | The process of H's action against John Morecrofte was to be registered in the Annals. |
| Action taken | Facts to be entered in the Annals. |
| 6 Oct 1634 |
| Entry | H had been imprisoned in Newgate until he paid a fine of £20. He had escaped, and the College now wrote to the Keeper of Newgate, Mr. Leighton, demanding £40 (double his fine) for this negligence, quoting 'the statute of the first of Queene Mary' to this effect, and threatening to take him to law if he did not pay. |
| Initiator of the complaint | college member |
| Second initiator of the complaint | college member |
| Third initiator of the complaint | college member |
| Action taken | None to H. (But see next.) |
| 17 Nov 1634 |
| Entry | The Lords committed H until he could be put on bail to answer the College. |
| Action taken | ?Reimprisoned pending bail. |
| 5 June 1635 |
| Entry | Mr. Richard Chalenor complained of the death of Nicholas Chalenor. He said that when NC fell sick, 'George Haughton caryed the sicke mans water to Dr. Buggs', who then treated NC. |
| Initiator of the complaint | relative of the patient |
| Action taken | ? |
| Verdict | case not completed |
| 29 Nov 1622 |
| Entry | H said that Dr Argent had approved his treatment, but Argent said that the pills might have contained poison. |
| Action taken | Deferred. |
| Number of crimes | 1 |
| 25 June 1635 |
| Entry | [Apothbiz.] In list of boycotted apothecaries. |
| Action taken | Discommuned (boycotted). |
| 6 Dec 1622 |
| Entry | Censors sent a judgement to the Judges of England, saying that nothing could be proved about poison in the pills. |
| Action taken | Judgement sent to law courts. |
| Number of crimes | 1 |
| 19 Dec 1622 |
| Entry | John HIDE (qv), servant of Mr. Whetlye, said that HANTON used to intercept the bills which SAVERYE sent to WHETLYE. |
| Action taken | ? |
| 4 April 1623 |
| Entry | H was fined 40s. for giving pills. |
| Action taken | Fined 40s. |
| Verdict | guilty |
| Sentence | Fined 40s. |
| Number of crimes | 1 |
| 16 May 1623 |
| Entry | H was fined 40s. in his absence. |
| Attitude of the accused | absent |
| Action taken | Fined 40s. though absent. |
| Number of crimes | 1 |
| 7 Feb 1628 |
| Entry | H appeared and complained of threats from a Fellow, and asked if the College was boycotting him. The President said that it was not. |
| Attitude of the accused | defiant |
| Action taken | ? |
| Verdict | case not completed |
| 4 March 1631 |
| Entry | Dr Spicer said that H, an apothecary, had treated a young child. |
| Initiator of the complaint | college member |
| Action taken | ? |
| Verdict | case not completed |
| Number of crimes | 1 |
| 22 Dec 1631 |
| Entry | DIODATI 227 (qv) accused H of practice on Mr Taverner, according to the report of William Tayler, apothecary. |
| Initiator of the complaint | other medical practitioner |
| Second initiator of the complaint | college member |
| Action taken | ? |
| Verdict | case not completed |
| Number of crimes | 1 |