| 6 Nov 1607 |
|---|
| Entry | The Beadle of the Surgeons, Edward Blaine, testified that the letter he had given to the President, from P to Mrs [sic] Crowder, was genuine. P had agreed to cure Mrs Crowder jun. for 20 marks. Gave vomitory treatment which produced insomnia, weakness and death in 7 days. |
|---|
| Initiator of the complaint | other medical practitioner |
|---|
| Action taken | Deferred. |
|---|
| Number of crimes | 1 |
|---|
| 11 Dec 1609 |
|---|
| Entry | 'Two absurd letters from Mrs. Paine excusing herself and written to the President were read.' |
|---|
| Action taken | ? |
|---|
| Number of crimes | 1 |
|---|
| 12 Jan 1610 |
|---|
| Entry | Failed to appear. |
|---|
| Attitude of the accused | absent |
|---|
| Action taken | Failed to appear. |
|---|
| Number of crimes | 1 |
|---|
| 23 Aug 1614 |
|---|
| Entry | Dr Paddy made charges against P. |
|---|
| Attitude of the accused | absent |
|---|
| Action taken | ?[To be summoned, presum?] |
|---|
| Verdict | case not completed |
|---|
| 26 June 1615 |
|---|
| Entry | John Harte said that the Archbishop of Canterbury had said that Mrs Weinman had more good from P's treatment 'than from all the physitians'. |
|---|
| Attitude of the accused | absent |
|---|
| Pressure applied by College | yes |
|---|
| Action taken | The President and Dr Goulston to apply to the Archbishop. |
|---|
| Verdict | case not completed |
|---|
| 4 Dec 1618 |
|---|
| Entry | P to be summoned. |
|---|
| Attitude of the accused | absent |
|---|
| Action taken | To be summoned. |
|---|
| Verdict | case not completed |
|---|
| m Palm Sun 1622 |
|---|
| Entry | P to be summoned. |
|---|
| Attitude of the accused | absent |
|---|
| Action taken | To be summoned. |
|---|
| Verdict | case not completed |
|---|
| 16 May 1623 |
|---|
| Entry | Thomas BATES, apothecary, was accused of making physic for Mrs. PAINE: 'but he sayes, he scornes it: but it is rather of Mr. Moye his neighbour.' |
|---|
| Action taken | ?None to Mrs. P. |
|---|
| Verdict | case not completed |
|---|
| 27 Nov 1607 |
|---|
| Entry | Judith Conert, gentlewoman of Westminster, said that P, of Aldersgate Street, professed medicine and had many patients. P had given C's son (aged 13) purging pills which were far too strong, had anointed him all over and made him sweat on hot tiles for 9 days to produce salivation, wch failed, and the jaw and glands swelled. P's assistant was Rolfe. P then brought in Dr BONHAM (101, qv) as though she were his assistant. P was said to sell 1 oz. powder for 10s., to boast insolently and to abuse other physicians, and 'many other facts here related'. |
|---|
| Initiator of the complaint | relative of the patient |
|---|
| Action taken | To appear (promised `willingly'). |
|---|
| Number of crimes | 1 |
|---|
| 4 Dec 1607 |
|---|
| Entry | Mr Crowder had sent his servant to fetch P. Servant said P had undertaken C's treatment and had accepted £5 'as if she deserved much more and because while she looked after him she neglected more generous patients'. Before treatment C was well enough to walk in the garden with her. |
|---|
| Initiator of the complaint | patient |
|---|
| Second initiator of the complaint | friend/neighbour/acquaintance of the patient |
|---|
| Action taken | See next. |
|---|
| Number of crimes | 1 |
|---|
| 22 Dec 1607 |
|---|
| Entry | P admitted that she had written letters to Mr Crowder, undertaking his cure for £5; that she had given him a 'preparatory and vomitory' medicine and had anointed him with an ointment made with mercury. But she claimed that she did nothing without the authority of Dr BONHAM. |
|---|
| Action taken | To reappear. |
|---|
| Number of crimes | 1 |
|---|
| 8 Jan 1608 |
|---|
| Entry | P wrote to excuse her absence. Her accusers were all present and Crowder's servant said she had killed his master. |
|---|
| Action taken | Failed to appear. |
|---|
| Number of crimes | 1 |
|---|
| 5 Feb 1608 |
|---|
| Entry | P, female practitioner, had been summoned for the second time, but did not appear. |
|---|
| Attitude of the accused | absent |
|---|
| Action taken | ? |
|---|
| 1 July 1608 |
|---|
| Entry | BONHAM (101, qv) was charged with involvement in the Crowder affair, and with defending P. He replied that he had no business arrangement with P and condemned 'the whole practice' [of partnerships with unqualified practitioners?]. Mrs Crowder said that P often claimed to do nothing without Dr B's instructions. |
|---|
| Initiator of the complaint | spouse of the patient |
|---|
| Attitude of the accused | absent |
|---|
| Action taken | ? |
|---|
| Number of crimes | 1 |
|---|
| 3 March 1609 |
|---|
| Entry | P failed to appear despite the imposition of a 40s. penalty for non-appearance. It was decided that she should be fined £10 and imprisoned. |
|---|
| Attitude of the accused | absent |
|---|
| Action taken | Failed to appear. To be fined £10 and imprisoned. |
|---|
| Number of crimes | 1 |
|---|
| 3 Nov 1609 |
|---|
| Entry | P was summoned, prohibited and fined. She did not pay the fine (see E). |
|---|
| Action taken | Summoned, prohibited, fined. |
|---|
| Verdict | guilty |
|---|
| Sentence | Prohibited and fined £10 (?plus/incl 40s. for non-appearance?) |
|---|
| Number of crimes | 1 |
|---|