| 7 Aug 1601 |
|---|
| Entry | [Collbiz.] |
|---|
| 24 Jan 1617 |
|---|
| Entry | Theophila Daye said that Margery HILL (396, qv) and S had treated a child for the itch, giving mercury water, with 'grevious accidents'. |
|---|
| Initiator of the complaint | person unconnected with the patient or the case |
|---|
| Attitude of the accused | absent |
|---|
| Action taken | To be summoned. |
|---|
| Verdict | case not completed |
|---|
| Number of crimes | 1 |
|---|
| 9 Jan 1618 |
|---|
| Entry | S to be summoned. |
|---|
| Attitude of the accused | absent |
|---|
| Action taken | To be summoned. |
|---|
| Verdict | case not completed |
|---|
| 4 Oct 1622 |
|---|
| Entry | It was decided that these quacks should be summoned for ill practice: ... Shepard ... |
|---|
| Action taken | To be summoned. |
|---|
| Verdict | case not completed |
|---|
| 16 Feb 1627 |
|---|
| Entry | S wished to settle. He 'confessed that he had been exhorted by Day to agree to join the others and oppose the College and that with Butler'. He asked for a licence for practice on the insane and offered to pay £20 fine and an annual sum. This was refused. He then asked if the College would connive at his practice. |
|---|
| Action taken | No LRCP. Offer of £20 plus annual sum refused. Connivance? |
|---|
| Verdict | guilty |
|---|
| Sentence | Rejected as LRCP |
|---|
| 16 May 1628 |
|---|
| Entry | Crooke accused S of practice on a servant of the Bishop of London. |
|---|
| Initiator of the complaint | college member |
|---|
| Action taken | ? |
|---|
| Verdict | case not completed |
|---|
| Number of crimes | 1 |
|---|
| 4 March 1631 |
|---|
| Entry | Crooke accused S of treating Dagges. |
|---|
| Initiator of the complaint | college member |
|---|
| Action taken | ? |
|---|
| Verdict | case not completed |
|---|
| Number of crimes | 1 |
|---|
| 25 June 1631 |
|---|
| Entry | Dr Hodgson charged S with practice on the widow of Ratcliffe. |
|---|
| Initiator of the complaint | college member |
|---|
| Attitude of the accused | absent |
|---|
| Action taken | To be summoned. |
|---|
| Verdict | case not completed |
|---|
| Number of crimes | 1 |
|---|
| 16 Dec 1631 |
|---|
| Entry | Crooke accused S of giving Mary Barton a clyster and an electuary. |
|---|
| Initiator of the complaint | college member |
|---|
| Action taken | ? |
|---|
| Verdict | case not completed |
|---|
| Number of crimes | 1 |
|---|
| 13 April 1632 |
|---|
| Entry | S complained of the apothecary SOUTHERTON (690, qv) for giving a bill to Sir Edmund Sckorye. Dr Raven then accused S [of something]. |
|---|
| Initiator of the complaint | college member |
|---|
| Attitude of the accused | informed on other practitioners |
|---|
| Action taken | ? |
|---|
| Verdict | case not completed |
|---|
| 22 Dec 1634 |
|---|
| Entry | S appeared, accused of practice on Mrs Johnson and Mr Berisford. He confessed, but said that SANDERS 648, TURNER ?752 and KIRTON 458 were all involved in the cases. |
|---|
| Action taken | To reappear, and to abstain from practice meanwhile. |
|---|
| Verdict | case not completed |
|---|
| Number of crimes | 2 |
|---|
| 5 Aug 1608 |
|---|
| Entry | S, recently an actor, appeared. There was insufficient evidence and he was to reappear in September. |
|---|
| Action taken | To reappear in September. |
|---|
| Verdict | case not completed |
|---|
| 12 Oct 1638 |
|---|
| Entry | S was rebuked for practising on madmen without a doctor (which his permission from the College had stipulated he must use). He promised better conduct. |
|---|
| Action taken | Promised to consult Fellows in the future. |
|---|
| Verdict | guilty |
|---|
| Sentence | Rebuked and promised to submit in future |
|---|
| 6 Oct 1609 |
|---|
| Entry | S was forbidden and fined 40s. |
|---|
| Action taken | Fined 40s. and forbidden to practise. |
|---|
| Verdict | guilty |
|---|
| Sentence | Fined 40s. and forbidden to practise |
|---|
| 3 Nov 1609 |
|---|
| Entry | S paid 40s. |
|---|
| Action taken | Paid his fine of 40s. |
|---|
| 9 Feb 1610 |
|---|
| Entry | S failed to appear. |
|---|
| Attitude of the accused | absent |
|---|
| Action taken | Failed to appear. |
|---|
| 9 March 1610 |
|---|
| Entry | S failed to appear. |
|---|
| Attitude of the accused | absent |
|---|
| Action taken | Failed to appear. |
|---|
| 1 Oct 1610 |
|---|
| Entry | For the College's action, see E. |
|---|
| Action taken | ? (See E.) |
|---|
| 1 Feb 1611 |
|---|
| Entry | See E. |
|---|
| Action taken | Fined £5 and imprisoned. See E. |
|---|
| Verdict | guilty |
|---|
| Sentence | Fined £5 and imprisoned |
|---|
| 13 Jan 1615 |
|---|
| Entry | S was brought by the marshal and confessed that he was a quack practising on mad people. The President questioned him on madness and the burning of humours which he claimed was involved in it. S cited Leonnellus Fauentinus. He admitted having treated the wife of John Newbery, chandler, by manacling her - but having failed to cure her despite fee of £10. He was ordered to retire but, fearing prison, escaped. |
|---|
| Attitude of the accused | confessed |
|---|
| Action taken | ?Ordered to retire |
|---|
| Verdict | guilty |
|---|
| Sentence | To abstain (?) |
|---|
| Number of crimes | 1 |
|---|