ECONOMIC HISTORY.
Agriculture. Stirchley was within the royal forest of Mount Gilbert
until 1301 (fn. 13) and probably contained uncleared
woodland well into the medieval period. The
wood of Stirchley, which survived in the early and
mid 13th century, lay in the north-east along the
boundary with Shifnal. (fn. 14) In the late 12th and mid
13th century the inhabitants cleared woodland to
bring new land into cultivation, (fn. 15) and the names
Brands ('land cleared by burning') and, near
Holmer, Stockings ('a clearing with stumps')
probably record this process. (fn. 16) A major reduction
of the wooded area occurred after 1277 when the
monks of Buildwas were licensed to assart 60 a. in
Stirchley, probably when establishing their
granges. (fn. 17) Timber and coaling wood were supplied from the parish for the Old Park ironworks
(in Dawley) in 1789-90 (fn. 18) but by the 19th century
little woodland remained: in 1811 there were 42 a.
of coppice in the parish (fn. 19) and by 1838 only 23 a. of
wood survived, mostly in Randlay wood in the
north. (fn. 20)
Stirchley's open fields do not seem to have been
extensive in the 16th and 17th centuries. Most
open arable land lay in the west, between Mad
brook and the road to Dawley, in a field known in
the 17th century as the common field towards
Dawley, but there were other small areas of open
cultivation in Cross furlong, immediately south of
the village, and in the Lower field, east of Mad
brook beside the road to Shifnal. Inclosure occurred by exchanges of strips between the owners of
Stirchley Hall and Grange farm in 1611, 1695,
and 1716, (fn. 21) but unfenced strips of glebe survived
into the 19th century. (fn. 22)
Most land in the parish was held as inclosed
permanent grassland from the 16th century, or
earlier, until the 19th century. The pastures in the
south belonging to Stirchley Hall had been inclosed by c. 1540, (fn. 23) and most of the glebe consisted of similar 'several' leasows in the 17th
century. (fn. 24) Most of the field pattern that survived
into the 20th century had probably been established by the end of the Middle Ages.
The name Stirchley ('pasture for young
bullocks'), (fn. 25) the numerous 'leasow' field names, (fn. 26)
and the lack of evidence for extensive open fields
all suggest that livestock farming played an important part in the parish economy. In the later
16th century the value of Grange farm was given
by stating that it supported a herd of 80 cows, an
expression suggesting that it was a dairy farm. (fn. 27) In
the early 19th century the acreage under crops
increased from only 221 a. (26 per cent of the
parish) in 1801 (fn. 28) to 542 a. (65 per cent) by 1839. (fn. 29)
Between 1867 and 1938 the percentage of agricultural land in Stirchley under grass rose from
under half to 90 per cent. By 1965 it had declined
back to its 1867 level. Between 1867 and 1965 the
number of cattle kept rose markedly; sheep declined proportionately. Pigs retained their popularity. Wheat usually accounted for two thirds of
the cereal acreage, barley and oats being the other
cereals usually grown. Between 1867 and 1965 the
amount of vegetables and roots grown commercially declined to an insignificant level. (fn. 30)
Table VIII
|
| Stirchley: Land Ues, Livestock, And Crops |
|
1867 |
1891 |
1938 |
1965 |
| Percentage of grassland |
44 |
58 |
90 |
45 |
| arable |
56 |
42 |
10 |
55 |
| Percentage of cattle |
8 |
27 |
45 |
60 |
| sheep |
64 |
47 |
42 |
6 |
| pigs |
28 |
26 |
13 |
34 |
| Percentage of wheat |
61 |
49 |
70 |
63 |
| barley |
21 |
25 |
0 |
34 |
| oats |
18 |
26 |
30 |
2 |
| mixed corn & rye |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
| Percentage of agricultural land growing roots & vegetables |
12 |
13 |
2 |
3 |
Sources: P.R.O., MAF 68/143, no. 14; /1340, no. 6; /3880,
Salop. no. 236; /4945, no. 236.
From the 15th century or earlier until the 19th
century most land in the parish was in a few large
holdings. In 1341 Buildwas abbey kept a third of
the parish in hand, (fn. 31) presumably as its two
granges, both of which, with the cottages in the
village that belonged to them, had been let on
long leases by 1500. (fn. 32) In the 17th and 18th
centuries there were four large farms in the
parish: Stirchley Hall (208 a. in 1777), (fn. 33) to which
most of the glebe was also let in the late 18th
century, (fn. 34) Grange farm (285 a. in 1777), (fn. 35) Holmer
(c. 97 a. in 1826), (fn. 36) and Brands (c. 123 a. in
1832), (fn. 37) which was separated from the Grange
estate c. 1660. (fn. 38) Another smaller farm was amalgamated with Stirchley Hall in 1801. (fn. 39)
During the 19th century the Brands estate was
fragmented into three holdings: Holmer House
farm, a smallholding of 17 a. established in the
1830s; (fn. 40) Lower Brands farm (54 a.), which was
separated in the 1860s; (fn. 41) and the remaining 53 a.
farmed from the original farmstead, subsequently
known as Upper Brands farm. (fn. 42) By 1907 83 a. of
the Grange estate was farmed as a separate holding, from the farmstead at Mount Pleasant. (fn. 43)
After the purchase of almost all the parish by
the new town development corporation during the
1960s little land remained in agricultural use. By
1979 no farms survived in the area of the ancient
parish, almost the only productive land being
Telford development corporation's central
nursery at Grange Farm, where from 1971 an 8-a.
site produced plants for landscaping purposes. (fn. 44)
Mills.
There was a mill 'below the garden' in
Stirchley c. 1240 (fn. 45) and two mills were mentioned
when the vill was granted to Buildwas abbey in
1247. (fn. 46) One mill was recorded on the abbey's
property in Stirchley in 1291. (fn. 47) One of the mills
probably stood immediately south of Mount
Pleasant, where a field named Mill hill or Windmill field was recorded in post-medieval sources. (fn. 48)
Remains of pools and floodgates that survived at
Holmer in the 19th century suggest that there
may have been a mill on Mad brook at that point. (fn. 49)
Industries.
Stirchley remained an agricultural
community until the beginning of the 19th century when coal and ironstone mining, iron founding, and brick making were started in the northwest quarter of the parish within reach of the
Shropshire Canal. Industry came to Stirchley as a
result of a partnership between I. H. Browne,
owner of most of the parish, and the Botfield
family, the Dawley ironmasters who had established collieries and ironworks on Browne's Old
Park estate in Dawley in the late 18th century.
William Botfield had rented 20 a. on the western
edge of Stirchley by 1800, (fn. 50) and he and his
brothers Thomas and Beriah took leases of cottages in the parish for their workmen from 1803. (fn. 51)
In 1811 they took a lease of 487 a. of the combined
Stirchley Hall and Grange estate from Browne, (fn. 52)
thus gaining access to the minerals under most of
the north and west half of the parish. Between
then and c. 1840 they established collieries, ironworks, and a brickworks on their Stirchley royalties. Beriah Botfield, who succeeded his father
Beriah and uncles, did not renew the lease in 1856
and the land, mineral rights, and plant were
leased to the Old Park Iron Co., (fn. 53) which continued the industrial operations in Stirchley until
it was wound up in 1871. (fn. 54) By 1900 mining and
ironworking had ceased. A chemical works,
occupying one of the former ironworks, flourished
until 1932 and brick making and the crushing of
furnace slag for road metal continued until the
1960s. The following account treats each industry
separately.
The top of the productive Middle Coal Measures lay c. 143 metres below ground level in
Stirchley. (fn. 55) The earliest mining recorded in the
parish was the sinking of a shaft by William
Botfield early in 1811 in the west, (fn. 56) probably at the
location known as Stirchley New Work c. 1815
and Stirchley pits in 1840. (fn. 57) By 1815 the damaged
land around the colliery and coke hearths extended to 4 a. (fn. 58) The Botfields consolidated the
area under which they could mine by taking a
lease of mineral rights under 17 a. of glebe in
1814 (fn. 59) and buying some scattered fields from Lord
Darlington in 1826. (fn. 60) By 1822 four pits appear to
have been in production, (fn. 61) and by 1840 (fn. 62) there
were five collieries in the parish: Randlay pits,
sunk in 1820; (fn. 63) Cuxey's Wood pits, sunk 1834-5; (fn. 64)
Forge pits, sunk 1825-6; (fn. 65) Grange colliery, probably opened by 1833; (fn. 66) and the original shaft at
Stirchley pits. The extent of seams that could be
worked was restricted by the Limestone fault, east
of which the coal lay deeper: in 1843 an attempt to
mine coal near Mount Pleasant was abandoned on
encountering the fault. (fn. 67) After the Old Park Iron
Co. was wound up in 1871 the mines were leased
to the Wellington Iron & Coal Co. Ltd. in 1874 (fn. 68)
but by 1879 had reverted to the landowners, the
Cheney family. (fn. 69) By 1881 all the pits except
Grange colliery had been closed. (fn. 70) Despite the
lease of mineral rights to Alfred Seymour Jones of
Wrexham in 1893, Grange colliery was closed in
1894. (fn. 71)
Coal and ironstone were not afterwards mined
from shafts in the parish but the deep seams
under Lower Brands and Holmer House farms
south-east of the Limestone fault were mined
from Kemberton colliery in the early 20th
century. (fn. 72)
Ironworking was started in the parish c. 1826
by the Botfield brothers. Blast furnaces were built
at the south end of Randlay reservoir (or Randay
pool) (fn. 73) and a forge and rolling mill were opened
probably c. 1828, west of the Shropshire Canal on
land purchased from Lord Darlington in 1826. (fn. 74)
The blast furnaces were leased with the mining
royalties to the Old Park Iron Co. after Botfield's
lease expired in 1856. (fn. 75) After the company was
wound up in 1871 the furnaces were leased in
1874 to the Wellington Iron & Coal Co., which
failed in 1877. (fn. 76) The furnaces passed back to the
owner of the site, Edward Cheney, who kept them
in blast for a few years, but they were shut down
by 1885. (fn. 77) The forge and rolling mills, which were
Botfield's freehold property, were sold by Beriah
Botfield's trustees in 1873 to the Haybridge Iron
Co., (fn. 78) which rebuilt the works in 1876 and established a nail factory on the site in 1874 or 1875. (fn. 79)
The nail factory was sold to John Maddock in
1876; (fn. 80) he moved his operations to Oakengates
two years later (fn. 81) but nails continued to be made at
Stirchley for a few years under different
proprietors. (fn. 82) The factory had closed by 1885 (fn. 83) but
the adjacent forge and rolling mills continued to
be operated by the Haybridge Co., the rolling mill
closing finally c. 1900. (fn. 84)
The use of the drift burden of boulder clay and
the marls of the Upper Coal Measures for brick
and tile making coincided with the exploitation of
other mineral resources by the Botfields. The
brothers were manufacturing bricks in Stirchley
in 1808-9, (fn. 85) possibly in a field south of Stirchley
village, later called Brick Kiln leasow, where
disused clay pits were still visible in 1980 and
where there appear to have been buildings c.
1815. (fn. 86) There was a second Brick Kiln leasow
north of Upper Brands. (fn. 87) Randlay brickworks in
the north, which continued to manufacture bricks
until 1964 or later, had been established by the
Botfields by 1838. (fn. 88) In 1893 the Haybridge Iron
Co. leased the works to George Wilkinson, who
formed, with Adam Boulton, the Randlay Brick &
Tile Co. (from 1939 A. Boulton & Co.). The
partners bought the works and c. 40 a. of surrounding land in 1898. (fn. 89) Clay was obtained on site
from an extensive pit, which was enlarged after
the purchase of more land in 1905 and used until
1969. (fn. 90) In 1964 the brickworks employed 91 (fn. 91) and
the three kilns produced c. 300,000 bricks a
week. (fn. 92)
The site of the former furnaces was leased in
1886 to Thomas Groom, the Wellington timber
merchant, who transferred his Wrekin Chemical
Works to Stirchley on obtaining the lease. The
chemical works extracted wood naphtha and tar
from timber supplied by the Grooms' yard at
Wellington and converted the residue into charcoal. Acetate of lime and sulphur were also
manufactured. (fn. 93) Groom's successor, George Wilkinson, bought the site in 1904 (fn. 94) and the works
closed in 1932. (fn. 95)
The extensive slag mounds that surrounded the
former furnaces were exploited as a source of
aggregate for road building and concrete manufacture from the 1890s. The mounds south-west
of the Wrekin Chemical Works were leased in
1893, and purchased in 1907, by H. C. Johnson, a
Wrexham quarry owner, who had built a slag
crusher on the site by 1901. (fn. 96) The industry expanded during the 1920s when most of the slag
mounds in the parish were acquired by Tarslag
(1923) Ltd. and the Bilston Slag Co. (1924) Ltd. (fn. 97)
By 1925 there were four slag-crushing plants in
the parish, (fn. 98) the largest being Tarslag's works,
employing up to c. 130 men, which both crushed
the slag and coated it with tar and bitumen.
Tarmac Ltd., which succeeded the Bilston company, also manufactured 'Vinculum' concrete walling blocks at Stirchley from c. 1925 to c. 1935,
and Tarslag operated a short-lived concrete plant
there as well. Impurities and the variable quality
of the slag led to the closure of the works. (fn. 99) By the
Second World War most of the slag mounds had
been exhausted and Tarslag's crushing and coating plant closed in 1941. Tarmac continued to
remove slag from Stirchley for processing elsewhere until c. 1964. (fn. 1)
The new town development corporation bought
the derelict industrial land on the west side of the
parish in 1967 and 1969. (fn. 2) Ten years later few
buildings remained there except the chimney at
the site of Stirchley furnaces, built in 1873 (fn. 3) and
preserved as an industrial monument in part of
Telford's town park.