LOCAL GOVERNMENT.
Tenurial and estate
matters, in particular the management of the woodland, provided the bulk of the business of the
Minchinhampton manor court in medieval times,
although pleas were heard very occasionally; from
the late 14th century the court was held jointly for
Minchinhampton and Avening manors. (fn. 3) The woodland of the manor and its members was in the care of
five woodwards in the early 14th century, for West
wood (probably the later common), for Rodborough,
for Gatcombe wood and Hazel wood (in Avening),
for Cowcombe wood, and for Windsoredge (in
Avening). (fn. 4) There was also a principal woodward, (fn. 5)
whose office was probably represented by the keeper
of the sealing axe recorded in 1542. (fn. 6) In the 19th
century the manor court was concerned exclusively
with the management of Minchinhampton common. (fn. 7)
In 1805 it appointed a perambulator of the common
to check encroachments (fn. 8) and in the second half of
the century the common was managed by a committee and hayward appointed by the court. (fn. 9) A committee continued to regulate the grazing rights after
the transfer of the common to the National Trust in
1913, and it was represented, with other interested
bodies, on the general management committee for the
common appointed then. The manor court does not
appear to have met after 1918 and the commoners'
committee became a self-perpetuating body. (fn. 10)
View of frankpledge was exercised at Caen
Abbey's court at Minchinhampton from the late
13th century, subject to rights reserved to the abbot
of Cirencester as lord of the hundred; the abbot was
represented at the twice-yearly view by his bailiff
who was given hospitality and at one of the views
received a payment of half a mark. (fn. 11) The view was
attended by tithingmen for Minchinhampton,
Avening, Aston, and Rodborough. (fn. 12) Infangthief was
included in a confirmatory grant of Caen Abbey's
English possessions from Henry I (fn. 13) and thieves were
hanged at the abbess's gallows at Minchinhampton
in the late 13th century. (fn. 14) Waif and tumbrel were
also claimed by the abbess in 1287. (fn. 15)
The accounts of the two churchwardens of the
parish survive from 1555. (fn. 16) The money needed by
them for church maintenance was usually allocated
out of the poor-rates until the end of the old poor
law system, and in 1836 after some controversy the
vestry decided to raise the funds needed on a voluntary basis. (fn. 17) Poor-relief was administered under the
vestry's general direction by three overseers, responsible for the town division, for the Chalford division,
and for Rodborough tithing (the west part of the
parish, adjoining Rodborough). Four supervisors of
the highways represented respectively the town
division, Hyde and Chalford, Burleigh and Brimscombe, and Rodborough tithing. (fn. 18) A scheme
advanced in 1800 for the establishment of a committee of 25 leading inhabitants to supervise poorrelief was never implemented. (fn. 19) Minchinhampton
became part of the Stroud union in 1836 (fn. 20) and has
remained in the Stroud rural district. A local board
of health was formed in 1849 at the instigation of
David Ricardo but apparently lapsed soon afterwards, (fn. 21) and a sanitary committee for the town under
the chairmanship of H. D. Ricardo operated for a
short time from 1866. (fn. 22)
A parish workhouse was built south of the town in
1727. (fn. 23) It had a salaried governor in 1788 but in the
early 1790s and again from 1814 the poor in the
house were farmed. (fn. 24) In 1803 the house had 70
inmates whose work produced the comparatively
high sum of £242. (fn. 25) From 1788 the parish subscribed to the Gloucester Infirmary and from 1800 a
surgeon was retained. (fn. 26) A salaried assistant overseer
was employed from 1803. (fn. 27) The parish was hit
particularly severely by the trade depression of 1784
and a subscription was raised to supplement the
rates; the unemployed men were put to work on the
roads and the women and children put to work
spinning at the market-house. (fn. 28) Road-work continued to be the principal resort in times of trade
depression: in 1798 the parish contracted to maintain a section of turnpike road (fn. 29) and the vestry
appointed a committee to supervise work on the
streets of the town in 1816. (fn. 30) In 1828 £150 was
allocated for employing paupers in spinning and
other occupations. (fn. 31) Later, emigration was assisted
out of the rates: in 1839 40-50 people left for
Australia; (fn. 32) in 1842 families were assisted on the
voyage to America and New Zealand; and in the
following year a family was assisted to move to
Bradford, evidently to find employment in the
woollen industry. (fn. 33) The annual cost of poor-relief
stood at £778 in 1776 and rose to over £2,000 by
1815 (fn. 34) but in the 1820s and 1830s the parish was able
to keep the cost down at around £1,500; (fn. 35) 178 people
were on permanent out-relief in 1803 and 230 in
1815. (fn. 36)
Footnotes
| 3 |
Ct. rolls for Minch. man. survive for several years in
the period 1273-94 and there are others for 1329-33,
1337-8, 1388, 1397, 1420, and 1469-70: S.C. 2/175/79-88.
There are ct. bks. for 1847-69 and 1876-1918: Glos. R.O.,
D 2219/1/5-7. Ibid. D 67 has transcripts of the medieval
rolls and other medieval manorial recs., made by C. E.
Watson. |
| 4 |
S.C. 6/856/19. |
| 5 |
S.C. 6/856/20. |
| 6 |
Hockaday Abs. cclxxxiii. |
| 7 |
Glos. R.O., D 2219/1/5-6. |
| 8 |
Ibid. P 217/VE 2/2. |
| 9 |
Ibid. D 2219/1/5-6; mins. and recs. of the cttee. and
hayward survive in ibid. 4, 9. |
| 10 |
Ibid. 7, 9; indenture 1913 penes, and ex inf., Mr.
Walker. |
| 11 |
Plac. de Quo Warr. (Rec. Com.), 254; cf. Cirencester
Cart. ii, p. 624. |
| 12 |
S.C. 2/175/79. |
| 13 |
Cal. Chart. R. 1341-1417, 158. |
| 14 |
J.I. 1/278 rot. 52d. |
| 15 |
Plac. de Quo Warr. (Rec. Com.), 254. |
| 16 |
The churchwardens' accts., covering the period 1555-
1785, are in Glos. R.O., P 217/CW 2/1-2, and extracts
were printed in 1854: copy in ibid. MI 1/2; there are
vestry mins. for 1786-1874 in ibid. VE 2/1-4; and
overseers' accts. for 1734-59 and 1787-1818 in P 217A/OV
2/1-4. |
| 17 |
Ibid. P 217/CL 2. |
| 18 |
Ibid. CW 2/2. |
| 19 |
Ibid. VE 2/1. |
| 20 |
Poor Law Com. 2nd. Rep. p. 524. |
| 21 |
Glos. R.O., P 217/VE 2/4; D 1619/2. |
| 22 |
Ibid. D 1619/2; P 217/MI 1/3. |
| 23 |
Ibid. D 1812, Ricardo fam.; cf. G.D.R., T 1/120. |
| 24 |
Glos. R.O., P 217/VE 2/1-3. |
| 25 |
Poor Law Abstract, 1804, 180-1. |
| 26 |
Glos. R.O., P 217/VE 2/1. |
| 27 |
Ibid. 2. |
| 28 |
Glouc. Jnl. 12, 26 Jan., 9 Feb. 1784. |
| 29 |
Glos. R.O., P 217/VE 2/1. |
| 30 |
Ibid. 2. |
| 31 |
Ibid. 3. |
| 32 |
Rep. Com. Handloom Weavers, p. 427. |
| 33 |
Glos. R.O., P 217/VE 2/3. |
| 34 |
Poor Law Abstract, 1804, 180-1; 1818, 154-5. |
| 35 |
Poor Law Returns (1830-1), p. 70; (1835), p. 68. |
| 36 |
Poor Law Abstract, 1804, 180-1; 1818, 154-5. |