Die Martis, 17° Januarii 1832.
DOMINI tam Spirituales quam Temporales præsentes
fuerunt:
|
|
|
Dux Cumberland. |
| Ds. Brougham & Vaux, Cancellarius. |
|
| Archiep. Armacan. |
|
Epus. Cicestrien.
Epus. Laonen, &c.
-
Ds. Melbourne, Unus Primariorum Secretariorum.
Ds. Dacre.
Ds. Teynham.
Ds. Grantham.
Ds. Holland.
Ds. Montagu.
Ds. Douglas of Douglas.
Ds. Auckland.
Ds. Mendip.
Ds. Carrington.
Ds. Bayning.
Ds. Ellenborough.
Ds. Arden.
Ds. Bexley.
Ds. Seaford.
Ds. Lyndhurst.
Ds. Cowley.
Ds. Stuart de Rothesay.
Ds. Wynford.
Ds. Fingall.
Ds. Sefton.
Ds. Dover.
Ds. Cloncurry. |
March. Lansdowne, Præses.
Ds. Durham, C. P. S.
Dux Richmond.
Dux Wellington.
March. Camden.
Comes Denbigh.
Comes Essex.
Comes Carlisle.
Comes Shaftesbury.
Comes Tankerville.
Comes Pomfret.
Comes Bathurst.
Comes Clarendon.
Comes Mansfield.
Comes Wicklow.
Comes Rosslyn.
Comes Grey.
Comes Eldon.
Vicecom. Hood.
Vicecom. Lorton.
Vicecom. Gordon.
Vicecom. Goderich. |
PRAYERS.
The Earl of Shaftesbury sat Speaker by virtue of
a former Commission.
Bush et al. v. Locke.
The Answer of Susannah Locke, to the Petition and
Appeal of John Bush and Ann his Wife, and Robert
Mattock, Devisees under the last Will and Testament of
Thomas Southwood Esquire, deceased, was this Day
brought in.
White et al. v. Baugh & Beale.
As was also, The Answer of Job Walker Baugh and
Thomas Beale, to the Petition and Appeal of Richard
White, Francis Jenks Burlton, Vincent Wheeler and James
Eysam Graham.
Nicol v. Sir R. W. Vaughan et al.
Also, The Answer of Sir Robert Williams Vaughan
Baronet, His Majesty's Attorney General, John Bellenden
Ker, John Bulteil, George Finch, Charles Fielding, Heneage Finch, Matilda Fielding, John Drummond and Georgiana Augusta his Wife, Lord Robert Stephen Fitzgerald
and Lady Sophia Charlotte his Wife, Georgiana Matilda
Drummond, Augusta Sophia Hicks and James Henry
Garrety, to the Petition and Appeal of William Nicol, the
Administrator of the Goods, Chattels and Credits of
George Nicol of Pall Mall, in the County of Middlesex,
Bookseller, deceased.
Nottidge & Black v. Prichard.
And also, The Answer of George Prichard, to the
Petition and Appeal of William Nottidge and Richard
Black.
Abp. Armagh takes the Oaths.
This Day John George Lord Archbishop of Armagh
took the Oaths, and also took and subscribed the Oath
of Abjuration, pursuant to the Statutes.
Lady L. Tollemache v. E. of Coventry et Ux:
Upon reading the Petition and Appeal of Laura Tollemache commonly called Lady Laura Tollemache; complaining of so much of a Decree and Order of the Court
of Chancery, of the 22d of November 1830, made in Three
certain Causes, in the first of which The Most Noble
Aubrey late Duke of St. Albans, an Infant, by his next
Friend, was Plaintiff, and The Most Noble Louisa Grace
late Duchess of St. Albans, Andrew Berkeley Drummond,
John Drummond and Charles Drummond, were Defendants; in the second, The Right Honorable George
William Coventry, then Viscount Deerhurst, now Earl of
Coventry, and The Right Honorable Lady Mary Deerhurst his Wife, now Countess of Coventry, Administratrix
of the Goods and Chattels of the said Aubrey late Duke
of St. Albans, an Infant, were Plaintiffs, and Andrew
Berkeley Drummond, John Drummond, Charles Drummond,
Laura Manners now Lady Laura Tollemache, and The
Most Noble William late Duke of St. Albans, were Defendants; and in the last, the said George William Earl
of Coventry (then Viscount Deerhurst) and the said
Countess (then Lady Mary Deerhurst) his Wife were
Plaintiffs, and Lord Amelius Beauclerk, Lord Frederick
Beauclerk, Thomas Nettleship and The Most Noble William Aubrey de Vere, now Duke of St. Albans, were
Defendants, by Original and Amended Bills, and Bills of
Revivor and Supplement, as declares the said Countess
of Coventry, as Administratrix of the said late infant
Duke, to be entitled to the Goods and Chattels bequeathed by the Will of Lord Vere, and that the same
ought to be declared to belong to the Appellant, as the
Personal Representative of the said Duke of St. Albans,
the Father of the said Infant; and praying, "That the
same may be reversed, so far as complained of, or
that the Appellant may have such Relief in the Premises, as to this House, in their Lordships great
Wisdom, shall seem meet; and that the said George
William Earl of Coventry and Mary Countess of
Coventry may be required to answer the said Appeal:"
It is Ordered, That the said Earl and Countess of
Coventry may have a Copy of the said Appeal, and do
put in their Answer or respective Answers thereunto, in
Writing, on or before Tuesday the 31st Day of this
instant January; and Service of this Order upon the said
Respondents, or upon their Solicitor or Clerk in Court
in the said Cause, shall be deemed good Service.
Baker to enter into a Recogce on it.
The House being moved, "That George Leeke Baker
of Lincoln's Inn Fields, in the County of Middlesex,
Gentleman, may be permitted to enter into a Recognizance for Lady Laura Tollemache, on account of her
Appeal depending in this House, she residing in the
Country:"
The same was agreed to; and Ordered accordingly.
Sir W. F. Eliott et al. v. E. of Minto.
Upon reading the Petition and Appeal of Sir William
Francis Eliott Baronet, of Stobs and Wells, and of Sir
James Boswell Baronet, of Auchinleck, George Sinclair
Esquire, younger, of Ullster, and James Brown, Accountant in Edinburgh, Trustees nominated and appointed by
him, for their Interest; complaining of Two Interlocutors
of the Lords of Session in Scotland, of the Second Division,
dated the 7th Day of July and 14th Day of November
1829; and praying, "That the same may be reversed,
varied or altered, or that the Appellants may have such
Relief in the Premises, as to this House, in their Lordships great Wisdom, shall seem meet; and that The
Right Honorable Gilbert Earl of Minto may be
required to answer the said Appeal:"
It is Ordered, That the said Gilbert Earl of Minto may
have a Copy of the said Appeal, and do put in his Answer
thereunto, in Writing, on or before Tuesday the 14th Day
of February next; and Service of this Order upon the
said Respondent, or upon any One of his known Agents
in the Court of Session in Scotland, shall be deemed good
Service.
Candy v. Campbell & Stuart.
Upon reading the Petition and Appeal of Charles Candy,
complaining of a Decree of the Court of Chancery, of the
26th Day of July last, made in Three certain Causes; in
the first of which Robert Campbell, Daniel Stuart, and
Caroline Harding an Infant, by the said Robert Campbell
her next Friend, were Plaintiffs, and William Harding
Clerk, James Weston Harding Clerk, Hugh Maltby
Spence Clerk, and Elizabeth his Wife, late Elizabeth
Harding Spinster, John Ward Harding and William
Harding the younger, Henry Harding and Harriet
Harding, Infants, by The Reverend John Spence Clerk,
their Guardian; Ann Candy Widow, Francis Candy,
Charles Candy and Mary his Wife, Henry Candy, William
Wright and Charlotte his Wife, Harriet Wright and
Charlotte Wright the younger, William Harding Wright,
Infants, by the said Reverend John Spence Clerk, their
Guardian; Charlotte Ann Harding, George Candy and
Thomas Candy, were Defendants; in the second, Robert
Campbell, Daniel Stuart, and Caroline Harding an Infant,
by the said Robert Campbell, her next Friend, were
Plaintiffs, and Hugh Maltby Spence, James Weston
Harding, William Harding and Ann Candy, were Defendants; and in the third, Robert Campbell and Daniel
Stuart were Plaintiffs, and James Weston Harding Clerk,
William Harding, Hugh Maltby Spence Clerk, John
Ward Harding and William Harding the younger,
Henry Harding and Harriet Harding, Infants, Ann
Candy Widow, Charles Candy and Mary his Wife, William
Wright, Charlotte Wright the younger, and William
Harding Wright, Infants, George Candy, Thomas Candy,
John Pulman and Charlotte Ann his Wife, Louisa Elizabeth Candy, or Elizabeth Louisa Candy, and Pearce Butler,
were Defendants, in so far as the same declares that the
said Plaintiff Caroline Harding is, under the Will of the
Testator, entitled absolutely to the Sum or Legacy of
Twenty thousand Pounds Three per Cent. Bank Annuities; and praying, "That the same may be reversed or
varied in such Manner as their Lordships shall, in
their Wisdom, think meet; and that the said Robert
Campbell and Daniel Stuart may be required to answer
the said Appeal:"
It is Ordered, That the said Robert Campbell and Daniel
Stuart may have a Copy of the said Appeal, and do put
in their Answer or respective Answers thereunto, in
Writing, on or before Tuesday the 31st Day of this instant
January.
Campbell & Hay v. Graham
Upon reading the Petition and Appeal of John Graham
Campbell Esquire, and Dame Margaret Hay Widow, late
Margaret Campbell Spinster; complaining of Two Orders
of the Court of Chancery, of the 8th Day of March 1830
and the 23d Day of August 1831, so far as relates to the
Fourth Exception, and the Declarations and Directions
made and given relative thereto and consequential thereon;
and also so much of the said Order of the 23d Day of August
1831 as relates to the Second and Sixth Exceptions, and
the Declarations and Directions relative thereto and consequential thereon; and praying, "That the same may
be reversed, so far as complained of, or that the Appellants may have such other Relief in the Premises, as to
this House, in their Lordships great Wisdom, shall
seem meet; and that William Graham Esquire may be
required to answer the said Appeal:"
It is Ordered, That the said William Graham may have
a Copy of the said Appeal, and do put in his Answer
thereunto, in Writing, on or before Tuesday the 31st Day
of this instant January; and Service of this Order upon
the Clerk in Court or Solicitor of the said Respondent
shall be deemed good Service.
A. & J. Dixon v. Dixon et al.
Upon reading the Petition and Appeal of Anthony
Dixon Esquire, Merchant in Dumbarton, and Joseph
Dixon Esquire, Advocate, Member of Parliament for the
Dumbarton District of Burghs, Trustees nominated and
appointed by the Settlement of the late Jacob Dixon
senior, Esquire, of the Dumbarton Glassworks, their
Father; complaining of an Interlocutor of the Lords of
Session in Scotland, of the First Division, of the 24th of
December 1831; and praying, "That the same may be
reversed, varied or altered, or that the Appellants may
have such Relief in the Premises, as to this House, in
their Lordships great Wisdom, shall seem meet; and
that William Dixon, Mrs. Jane Isabella Dixon or
Campbell, Mrs. Mary Dixon or Buchanan, Mrs. Ann
Margaret Dixon or Napier, Miss Elizabeth Frances
Dixon, Humphrey Walter Campbell, Robert Buchanan,
David Napier, Jane Dixon, Elizabeth Dixon and
Mrs. Jacob Dixon, may be required to answer the said
Appeal:"
It is Ordered, That the said William Dixon, and the
several other Persons last named, may have a Copy of the
said Appeal, and do put in their Answer or respective
Answers thereunto, in Writing, on or before Tuesday the
14th Day of February next; and Service of this Order
upon the said Respondents, or upon any One of their
known Agents respectively in the Court of Session in
Scotland, shall be deemed good Service.
Clyne v. Manson & Goldie.
Upon reading the Petition and Appeal of David Clyne,
Solicitor, Supreme Courts, Edinburgh; complaining of
Three Interlocutors of the Lord Ordinary in Scotland,
dated 22d November 1828, 13th June 1829 and 19th May
1831; and also of Two Interlocutors of the Lords of
Session there, of the Second Division, dated the 30th Day
of June and the 22d Day of November 1831; and
praying, "That the same may be reversed, varied or
altered, so far as complained of, or that the Appellant
may have such Relief in the Premises, as to this House,
in their Lordships great Wisdom, may seem meet; and
that Alexander Manson, and Archibald Watson Goldie,
Writer to the Signet, may be required to answer the
said Appeal:"
It is Ordered, That the said Alexander Manson and
Archibald Watson Goldie may have a Copy of the said
Appeal, and do put in their Answer or respective Answers
thereunto, in Writing, on or before Tuesday the 14th Day
of February next; and Service of this Order upon the
said Respondents, or upon any of their known Counsel or
Agents in the Court of Session in Scotland, shall be deemed
good Service.
Adamson & Watson v. Stormonth et al:
Upon reading the Petition and Appeal of James Adamson, residing in Hanover Street, Edinburgh, and Thomas
Watson, now residing at Morningside near Edinburgh,
Two of the Trustees named and appointed by the now
deceased James Stormonth of Lednathy, Writer in Edinburgh, and also of the said James Adamson, as Disponee
of the said James Stormonth; complaining of an Interlocutor of the Lord Ordinary in Scotland, of 11th of
March 1830, and also of an Interlocutor of the Lords of
Session there, of the Second Division, of the 17th November
1830, in so far "as they may be held, by Construction,
Implication or otherwise, to find that the said James
Adamson shall be obliged to discount and allow, out of
his Fourth Share of the Price of the said Lands of
Inverchroskie and Whitefield, the One Half of what he
shall recover under the Bond for Two thousand four
hundred Pounds granted by the deceased Honorable
Allan Maconochie of Meadowbank, and Alexander Maconochie Esquire, his Son, to the said James Stormonth,
in consequence of a Conveyance thereof executed by
the said deceased James Stormonth on the 16th Day of
February 1805, in favor of Charles Stormonth and the
Heirs of his Body, and failing them the said James
Adamson;" also of an Interlocutor of the Lord Ordinary,
dated 8th July last, and also of an Interlocutor of the
said Lords of Session, of the Second Division, dated
9th December 1831, in so far as they repel the Petitioners
Objections to the Drafts of the Deeds extended and
executed by the Parties, and in as far as they do not
find, that, in the Event of Mrs. Darling exercising the
Power of Division conferred on her by Mr. Stormonth's
Trust Settlement of 18th February 1805, before the Deed
of Ratification by Ellen Stormonth Darling is delivered
to the Defender James Adamson, she is bound to set
apart for Ellen Stormonth Darling as much of the Price of
the Lands as will be equal to her Claims against the said
Defender under Mr. Stormonth's Settlement of 25th August
1812, and also in as far as the said Interlocutors find
the Defenders liable to the Pursuers in any Expences,
and do not find the Defenders entitled to their Expences;
and praying, "That the same may be reversed, varied
or altered, in so far as above complained of, or that
the Appellants may have such Relief in the Premises,
as to this House, in their Lordships great Wisdom,
shall seem meet; and that Mrs. Margaret Stormonth
or Darling, as One of the surviving and accepting
Trustees of the said James Stormonth deceased, and as
Administratrix in Law for Helen Stormonth Darling,
her youngest Daughter; and the said Jessie Darling
or Wilson, and Patrick Wilson her Husband, for his
Interest; Catherine Darling, Robert Darling, Peter
Darling and Agnes Darling, all for themselves, and as
next of Kin of the said Elizabeth Darling deceased,
their Sister; and the said James Stormonth Darling,
as One of the next of Kin of the said Elizabeth Darling,
may be required to answer the said Appeal:"
It is Ordered, That the said Mrs. Margaret Stormonth,
and the several other Persons last named, may have a
Copy of the said Appeal, and do put in their Answer or
respective Answers thereunto, in Writing, on or before
Tuesday the 14th Day of February next; and Service of
this Order upon the said Respondents, or upon any One
of their known Agents in the Court of Session in Scotland,
shall be deemed good Service.
Robertson to enter into a Recogce on it.
The House being moved, "That David Robertson of
Great George Street, Westminster, Gentleman, may be
permitted to enter into a Recognizance for James
Adamson and Thomas Watson, on account of their
Appeal depending in this House, they residing in
Scotland:"
The same was agreed to; and Ordered accordingly.
Pasteur Leave for a Naturalization Bill:
Upon reading the Petition of Pierre Jaques Adolphe
Pasteur, praying Leave to bring in a Bill for his Naturalization:
It is Ordered, That Leave be given to bring in a Bill,
according to the Prayer of the said Petition.
Bill read.
Accordingly, The Earl of Shaftesbury presented to the
House a Bill, intituled, "An Act for naturalizing Pierre
Jaques Adolphe Pasteur."
The said Bill was read the First Time.
Bush et al. v. Locke, Appellants Petition for Time for their Case, referred to Appeal Com ee.
Upon reading the Petition of John Bush, and others,
Appellants in a Cause depending in this House, to which
Susannah Locke is Repondent; praying, "That their
Lordships will be pleased to grant to the Petitioners a
Month's further Time to lay their printed Case upon
their Lordships Table:"
It is Ordered, That the said Petition be referred to the
Appeal Committee.
White et al. v. Baugh & Beale, Appellants Petition for Time for their Case, referred to Appeal Com ee.
Upon reading the Petition of Richard White, and
others, Appellants in a Cause depending in this House,
to which Job Walker Baugh and Thomas Beale are Respondents; praying their Lordships "to extend the
Time for lodging their printed Cases in their Appeal,
and that they may be ordered to have Six Weeks
further Time for that Purpose:"
It is Ordered, That the said Petition be referred to the
Appeal Committee.
Nicol v. Sir R. W. Vaughan et al.
The House being moved, "That a Day may be appointed for hearing the Cause wherein William Nicol
is Appellant, and Sir Robert Williams Vaughan, and
others, are Respondents:"
It is Ordered, That this House will hear the said Cause,
by Counsel at the Bar, on the first vacant Day for Causes
after those already appointed.
The House was adjourned during Pleasure.
The House was resumed by The Lord Chancellor.
Wallbeoff's Divorce Bill, Proceedings of the Judges at Ceylon, delivered.
The Lord Chancellor laid upon the Table of the
House, Proceedings of the Judges of the Supreme
Court of Judicature at Ceylon on the Bill, intituled,
"An Act to dissolve the Marriage of John Wallbeoff
with Adriana Cornelia his now Wife, and to enable
him to marry again; and for other Purposes therein
mentioned," transmitted to his Lordship from the
said Judges, pursuant to the Directions of an Act
passed in the First Year of the Reign of His late
Majesty, intituled, "An Act to enable the Examination
of Witnesses to be taken in India in support of Bills
of Divorce on account of Adultery committed in
India."
Ordered, That the said Proceedings do lie on the
Table.
Ordered, That the said Proceedings be printed.
Slane Peerage, Leave to G. Bryan to lodge an additional Case:
Upon reading the Petition of George Bryan of Jenkinstown, in the County of Kilkenny, Esquire, claiming to be
Lord Baron of Slane in that Part of the United Kingdom
called Ireland; praying their Lordships, "That he may
be at liberty to lay on the Table of the House the
Prints of his additional Case, for the Purpose of showing
explicitly the Grounds upon which his Claim is founded;
and that he may be permitted to prove the same by
further Evidence before their Lordships:"
It is Ordered, That the said George Bryan be at liberty
to lay on the Table of this House the Prints of his additional Case, as desired.
Com ee to meet.
Ordered, That the Committee for Privileges, to whom
the Petition of George Bryan of Jenkinstown, in the
County of Kilkenny, Esquire, to His Majesty, praying,
"That his Claim to the Barony of Slane may be referred
to The House of Peers, to report whether the said Title
be or be not a Barony in Fee by Writ of Summons,
descendible to Heirs General, and whether the same is
or is not now in Abeyance between Edward Lord Dunsany and the Petitioner," together with His Majesty's
Reference thereof to this House, and the Report of the
Attorney General thereunto annexed; also the Petition
of Henry Fleming of the City of Dublin; also the Petition
of James Stewart Fleming of Belville, in the County of
Cavan, in Ireland, Esquire, late a Captain in His Majesty's
Army; and also the Petition of James Fleming of Monkstown, in the County of Dublin, Esquire, in relation to the
said Claim, stand referred, do meet to consider further of
the said Claim on Friday the 27th of this instant January;
and that Notice thereof be given to His Majesty's Attorney
General for England, and also to His Majesty's Attorney
and Solicitor General for Ireland.
Foreign Gloves, Petition from Milborne-Port against Importation of.
Upon reading the Petition of the Glove Manufacturers
of Milborne-Port, in the County of Somerset, whose
Names are thereunto subscribed; praying their Lordships
to prohibit the Importation of Foreign Gloves:"
It is Ordered, That the said Petition do lie on the
Table.
Turnpike Roads, (England,) Returns respecting, Ordered.
Ordered, That the several Clerks of the Peace in England do lay before this House, "A Copy of the Receipt
and Expenditure of all Turnpike Roads that were
transmitted to their respective Offices for the Year
ending Michaelmas 1829; with the Name and Place of
Abode of the Clerks of each such Turnpike Road."
Ordered, That the several Clerks of the Peace in England do lay before this House, "A Return to the following
Questions, to be obtained by them from the Clerks of
the several Turnpike Roads:
|
|
____________________________________________Trust,
County of_______________________________________ |
| Michaelmas 1829. |
|
| The Name and Place of Abode of the Treasurer of the Turnpike whereof you are Clerk? |
| The Name and Place of Abode of the General Surveyor, if any? |
| The Name and Place of Abode of the Superintending Surveyor or Surveyors? |
| The Name of all Parishes which pay Composition in lieu of Statute Duty, with the Amount paid? |
| The Date of the Act of Parliament for the Formation of each such Turnpike Road, and the Date of every subsequent Act that has passed, either for its Renewal, Amendment, Separation, or Consolidation with other Turnpike Roads? |
|
Ordered, That the several Clerks of the Peace in England do lay before this House, "A Return to the following
Questions, to be obtained by them from the Surveyors
of the several Turnpike Roads, and made in the following
Form:
|
___________________________________ Trust,
County of ____________________________________ |
|
| State the Amount of Wages for Manual Labour for Current Repairs of the Road. |
The Amount of Team Labour and Carriage of Materials for Current Repairs. |
The Amount of Materials purchased for Current Repairs. |
The Amount of Land purchased, or Damages paid for, for Current Repairs. |
State the Amount of Wages for Manual Labour for Improvements. |
The Amount of Team Labour and Carriage of Materials for Improvements. |
The Amount of Materials purchased for Improvements. |
The Amount of Land purchased, or Damages paid for, for Improvements. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Where Improvements contracted for in the Gross, state the Amount |
|
|
State the Name of every Parish through which the Turnpike of which you are the Surveyor passes, with Distance of Road each Parish contains. |
| Name of Turnpike Road. |
Name of Parish. |
M. |
R. |
P. |
Observations or Remarks. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjourn.
Dominus Cancellarius declaravit præsens Parliamentum
continuandum esse usque ad et in diem Jovis, decimum
nonum diem instantis Januarii, horâ undecimâ Auroræ,
Dominis sic decernentibus.