Die Jovis, 9° Februarii 1832.
DOMINI tam Spirituales quam Temporales præsentes
fuerunt:
|
|
|
Dux Cumberland. |
| Ds. Brougham & Vaux, Cancellarius. | |
Epus. Laonen, &c.
-
Ds. Monson.
Ds. Holland.
Ds. Foley.
Ds. Suffield.
Ds. Kenyon.
Ds. Auckland.
Ds. Selsey.
Ds. Redesdale.
Ds. Ellenborough.
Ds. Ponsonby of Imokilly.
Ds. Penshurst.
Ds. Tenterden.
Ds. Plunket.
Ds. Stuart de Rothesay.
Ds. Wallace.
Ds. Sefton.
Ds. Dover.
Ds. Chaworth. |
March. Lansdowne, Præses.
Dux Norfolk, Marescallus.
Dux Devonshire, Camerarius.
Dux Richmond.
March. Salisbury.
March. Thomond.
March. Westmeath.
March. Cleveland.
Comes Denbigh.
Comes Doncaster.
Comes Shaftesbury.
Comes Carnarvon.
Comes Wicklow.
Comes Gosford.
Comes Harrowby.
Comes Grey.
Comes Mulgrave.
Vicecom. Hood.
Vicecom. Lorton.
Vicecom. Gordon.
Vicecom. Beresford. |
PRAYERS.
The Earl of Shaftesbury sat Speaker by virtue of
a former Commission.
Maule v. Maule.
The Answer of William Maule Esquire, of Edinburgh,
to the Petition and Appeal of The Honorable William
Maule of Panmure, was this Day brought in.
Corporation of Dublin v. The Attorney General for Ireland, et al.
Upon reading the Petition and Appeal of The Right
Honorable The Lord Mayor, Sheriffs, Commons and Citizens of the City of Dublin, and The Reverend William Henry
Archer, Executor of William Henry Archer deceased; complaining of a Decree of the Court of Chancery in Ireland,
of the 7th Day of July 1831, and also of an Order of the
said Court of the 25th Day of January 1832; and praying,
"That the same may be reversed, or that the Appellants
may have such further and other Relief in the Premises,
as to this House, in their Lordships great Wisdom,
shall seem meet; and that The Right Honorable
Francis Blackburne, His Majesty's Attorney General for
Ireland, John M'Mullen, Richard Purdy and Henry
Staines, may be required to answer the said Appeal:"
It is Ordered, That the said Francis Blackburne, His
Majesty's Attorney General for Ireland, and the several
other Persons last named, may have a Copy of the said
Appeal, and do put in their Answer or respective Answers
thereunto, in Writing, on or before Thursday the 15th Day
of March next; and Service of this Order upon the Six
Clerk and Solicitor of the said Respondents, shall be
deemed good Service.
Bush et al. v. Locke, Respondent's Petition to lodge her Case, referred to Appeal Com ee.
Upon reading the Petition of Susannah Locke, Respondent in a Cause depending in this House, to which
John Bush, and others, are Appellants; praying, "That
their Lordships will be pleased to order that the Petitioner may be at liberty to lay her printed Case upon
the Table of the House:"
It is Ordered, That the said Petition be referred to the
Appeal Committee.
Maule v. Maule, Respondent's Petition to lodge his Case, referred to Appeal Com ee.
Upon reading the Petition of William Maule Esquire,
Respondent in a Cause depending in this House, to which
The Honorable William Maule is Appellant; praying,
"That their Lordships will be pleased to permit him to
lodge his Case:"
It is Ordered, That the said Petition be referred to the
Appeal Committee.
2d Report from Appeal Com ee.
The Earl of Shaftesbury reported from the Lords Committees appointed to consider of the Causes in which
Prints of the Parties Cases, now depending in this House
upon Appeals and Writs of Error, have not been delivered,
pursuant to the Standing Orders of this House, and of
other Matters relating thereto; and to report to the
House; and to whom were referred certain Petitions in
the following Causes; The North British Insurance Company against Barker; Vaughan against Gronow; The
Duke of Hamilton and Brandon against Aikman; White
and others against Baugh and another; Bush and others
against Locke; Howard against The Earl Digby; Lewis
against Colmer and others; Reddie against Syme; Dixon
and others against Dixon and others; and Morris against
Davies and others; "That the Committee had met, and
considered the Respondents Petitions in the Causes
The North British Insurance Company against Barker,
Vaughan against Gronow, and The Duke of Hamilton
and Brandon against Aikman, severally praying their
Lordships for Leave now to lodge their printed Cases;
and had heard the Agents thereon, and the Committee
are of Opinion, That the Petitioners may respectively
be allowed now to deliver in their printed Cases: That
the Committee had also considered the Appellants
Petition in the Cause White and others against Baugh
and another, praying their Lordships that they may
have Six Weeks further Time for lodging their Cases;
and had heard the Appellants Agent thereon, and the
Committee are of Opinion, That the Petitioners may
be allowed Six Weeks further Time to deliver in their
printed Cases: That the Committee had also considered the Appellants Petition in the Cause Bush and
others against Locke, praying their Lordships for a
Month's further Time to lodge their printed Cases;
and had also considered a further Petition of the said
Appellants, praying their Lordships that they may be
at liberty now to lodge their printed Cases; and had
heard the Appellants Agent thereon, who stated to
the Committee that the Cases were now ready for
Delivery; and had also heard the Respondent's Agent
thereon; and the Committee are of Opinion, That the
Petitioners may be allowed now to deliver in their
printed Cases: That the Committee had also considered
the Petition of Henry Howard Esquire, praying their
Lordships that he may be at liberty forthwith to lodge
his Petition of Appeal against a Decree pronounced
on the 8th of November last, by The Vice Chancellor
of England, in a Cause in the Court of Chancery,
wherein Edward Earl Digby (the Respondent to the
said Petition of Appeal) was Plaintiff, and the Petitioner Defendant; and had heard the Agents thereon,
and the Committee are of Opinion, That the Petitioner
may, under the Circumstances of the Case, be allowed
now to lodge his said Petition of Appeal, as desired:
That the Committee had also considered the Petition of
James Lewis of Great Russell Street, Bloomsbury, Pencil
Manufacturer, praying their Lordships to grant him
Leave to present his Petition of Appeal against a Decree
or Decretal Order pronounced on the 2d of December
last, by The Master of the Rolls in England, in a Cause
depending before him, wherein the Petitioner was the
Plaintiff, and Robert Colmer, and others, (the Respondents to the Petition of Appeal) were the Defendants;
and had heard the Petitioner's Agent thereon, and the
Committee are of Opinion, That the Petitioner may,
under the Circumstances of the Case, be allowed to present his said Petition of Appeal, as desired: That the
Committee had also considered the Appellants Petition
in the Cause Dixon and others against Dixon and others,
praying their Lordships to permit them to amend their
Appeal by adding thereto an Interlocutor of the Lords
of Session, of the First Division, of the 20th of January
1832; and had heard the Appellants Agent thereon,
and the Committee are of Opinion, That the Petitioners
may be allowed to amend their said Appeal by adding
the said Interlocutor of the 20th of January 1832
thereto, as desired, the Petitioners amending the Respondents Copy: That the Committee had also considered the Appellant's Petition in the Cause Morris
against Davies and others, praying their Lordships to
be pleased to cause Application to be made for the
Notes of the Learned Judges who presided at the
Trials referred to in the Petition, furnished to Lord
Lyndhurst, as then Lord Chancellor, or to the respective Judges who presided at the Trials; and that the
Petitioner may be allowed to take a Copy of such
Notes to enable the Petitioner's Counsel finally to
settle his Case; and that the Petitioner may be allowed
Three Weeks further Time to lay the Prints of his
Case upon the Table of the House, to be calculated
from the Time when a Report shall have been made
upon this Petition; or that their Lordships will be
pleased to make such other Order, and grant the Petitioner such other Time to complete his Case, as to
their Lordships shall seem meet; and had heard the
Agents thereon, and the Committee are of Opinion,
That so much of the Prayer of the Petition as relates
to the Notes of the Learned Judges ought not to be
complied with, but that the Petitioner may be allowed
a Month's further Time to deliver in his printed Case:
And that the Committee had also considered the Petition of Charles Murray Barston, Accountant in Edinburgh, stating, that, by a Trust Deed dated the 25th of
November last, David Syme, the Respondent in the
Cause Reddie against Syme, conveyed and made over
to and in favor of the Petitioner his whole Right and
Interest in the Subject Matter of this Appeal, and
that the Petitioner accepted of the Trust thereby vested
in him the said Charles Murray Barston; and praying
their Lordships to order that the Petitioner be added
as a Party Respondent to the Appeal; and had heard
the Respondent's Agent thereon, who stated to the
Committee that there was no Objection made thereto
on the Part of the Appellant; and the Committee are
of Opinion, That the said Charles Murray Barston
may be added as a Party Respondent to the said Appeal,
as desired; and that he should put in his Answer
thereunto, in Writing, within Four Weeks."
Which Report, being read by the Clerk, was agreed to
by the House; and Ordered accordingly.
Howard v. E. of Digby.
Upon reading the Petition and Appeal of Henry Howard
of Corby Castle, in the County of Cumberland, Esquire;
complaining of a Decree of the Court of Chancery, of
the 8th of November 1831, which Decree was enrolled
on the 14th Day of January 1832; and praying, "That
the same may be reversed, or that the Appellant may
have such other Relief in the Premises, as to this
House, in their Lordships great Wisdom, shall seem
meet; and that The Right Honorable Edward Earl of
Digby may be required to answer the said Appeal:"
It is Ordered, That the said Edward Earl of Digby
may have a Copy of the said Appeal, and do put in his
Answer thereunto, in Writing, on or before Thursday
the 23d Day of this instant February; and Service of
this Order upon the Solicitor or Clerk in Court of the
said Respondent shall be deemed good Service.
Few to enter into a Recogce on it.
The House being moved, "That Charles Few, of
Henrietta Street, Covent Garden, in the County of
Middlesex, Gentleman, may be permitted to enter into a
Recognizance for Henry Howard Esquire, on account
of his Appeal depending in this House, he residing
in the Country:"
The same was agreed to; and Ordered accordingly.
Ashford Roads Bill.
Hodie 2a
vice lecta est Billa, intituled, "An Act for
maintaining and improving the Turnpike Roads leading
from Ashford to Buxton, and from Tideswell to Blackwell, and from Edensor to Ashford, all in the County
of Derby."
Ordered, That the said Bill be committed to the
Consideration of the Lords present this Day:
Their Lordships, or any Five of them, to meet Tomorrow, at Ten o'Clock in the Forenoon, in the
Prince's Lodgings, near the House of Peers; and
to adjourn as they please.
The House was adjourned during Pleasure.
The House was resumed by The Lord Chancellor.
Liverpool Marine Assurance Co's Bill.
A Message was brought from the House of Commons,
by Viscount Sandon and others;
With a Bill, intituled, "An Act for enabling The Liverpool Marine Assurance Company to sue and be sued in
the Name of the Chairman for the Time being, or of
any One of the Directors of the said Company;" to
which they desire the Concurrence of this House.
The said Bill was read the First Time.
Court of Session Bill:
The Order of the Day being read for the Third Reading of the Bill, intituled, "An Act to provide for carrying
on the Business of the Court of Session in Scotland when
interrupted by the Death or necessary Absence of any
of the Judges thereof;"
The said Bill was accordingly read the Third Time.
The Question was put, "Whether this Bill shall
pass?"
It was resolved in the Affirmative.
Message to H.C. that the Lords have agreed to it.
A Message was sent to the House of Commons, by
Mr. Wingfield and Mr. Trower;
To acquaint them, That the Lords have agreed to the
said Bill, without any Amendment.
Aston Rowant Inclosure Bill: The King's Consent signified:
The Earl of Shaftesbury acquainted the House, "That
His Majesty, having been informed of the Contents of
the Bill, intituled, "An Act for inclosing Lands in the
Parish of Aston Rowant, in the County of Oxford,"
was pleased to consent (as far as His Majesty's Interest
is concerned) that their Lordships may proceed
therein as they shall think fit."
Bill reported.
Then The Earl of Shaftesbury reported from the Lords
Committees, to whom the last-mentioned Bill was committed, "That they had considered the said Bill, and
examined the Allegations thereof, which were found to
be true; that the Parties concerned had given their
Consents to the Satisfaction of the Committee; and
that the Committee had gone through the Bill, and
made One Amendment thereto."
Which Amendment was read by the Clerk as follows;
(vizt.)
"Pr. 70. L. 34. Leave out from ("Effect") to ("Provided") in Press 72, Line 34, and insert Clause A.
"Clause A. Provided always, and be it enacted, That
no Lease or Leases to be made by virtue of the said
first-recited Act or this Act of any Land or Ground to
be allotted to the said Vicar shall be good, valid or
effectual unless the Consent of The King's Most Excellent Majesty, His Heirs and Successors, as Patron of the
said Vicarage, shall be had or obtained thereto before
the Execution of such Lease or Leases."
And the said Amendment, being read a Second Time,
was agreed to by the House.
Adjourn.
Dominus Cancellarius declaravit præsens Parliamentum
continuandum esse usque ad et in diem Veneris, decimum
diem instantis Februarii, horâ undecimâ Auroræ, Dominis
sic decernentibus.