Die Martis, 13° Martii 1832.
DOMINI tam Spirituales quam Temporales præsentes
fuerunt:
|
|
|
Dux Sussex. |
| Ds. Brougham & Vaux, Cancellarius. | |
Epus. Londinen.
Epus. Bath. et Well.
Epus. Lich. et Cov.
Epus. Bangor.
Epus. Carliol.
Epus. Roffen.
Epus. Exon.
Epus. Cicestrien.
Epus. Laonen, &c.
-
Ds. Gower.
Ds. Colville of Culross.
Ds. Belhaven & Stenton.
Ds. King.
Ds. Monson.
Ds. Holland.
Ds. Sundridge & Hamilton.
Ds. Montagu.
Ds. Suffield.
Ds. Douglas of Douglas.
Ds. Auckland.
Ds. Mendip.
Ds. Selsey.
Ds. Redesdale.
Ds. Ellenborough.
Ds. Arden.
Ds. Mont Eagle.
Ds. Ponsonby of Imokilly.
Ds. Hopetoun & Niddry.
Ds. Hill.
Ds. Clanbrassill.
Ds. Ravensworth.
Ds. Bexley.
Ds. Wharncliffe.
Ds. Fife.
Ds. Plunket.
Ds. Melros.
Ds. Stuart de Rothesay.
Ds. Rosebery.
Ds. Clanwilliam.
Ds. Skelmersdale.
Ds. Wallace.
Ds. Fingall.
Ds. Sefton.
Ds. Dover.
Ds. Howden.
Ds. Panmure.
Ds. Oakley.
Ds. Dinorben.
Ds. Cloncurry. |
March. Lansdowne, Præses.
Ds. Durham, C. P. S.
Dux Richmond.
Dux Northumberland.
Dux Wellington.
March. Queensberry.
March. Salisbury.
March. Bute.
March. Thomond.
March. Cholmondeley.
March. Cleveland.
Comes Denbigh.
Comes Westmorland.
Comes Shaftesbury.
Comes Albemarle.
Comes Jersey.
Comes Oxford & Mortimer.
Comes De Lawarr.
Comes Bathurst.
Comes Clarendon.
Comes Beverley.
Comes Mansfield.
Comes Carnarvon.
Comes Charlemont.
Comes Wicklow.
Comes Rosslyn.
Comes Chichester.
Comes Gosford.
Comes Grey.
Comes Mulgrave.
Comes Verulam.
Comes Bradford.
Comes Eldon.
Comes Falmouth.
Comes Vane.
Comes Amherst.
Vicecom. Hood.
Vicecom. Lorton.
Vicecom. Gordon.
Vicecom. Beresford.
Vicecom. Goderich.
Ds. Melbourne, Unus Primariorum Secretariorum.
Ds. Stourton.
Ds. Teynham. |
PRAYERS.
The Earl of Shaftesbury sat Speaker by virtue of
a former Commission.
Downham Market Road Bill:
Hodie 3a
vice lecta est Billa, intituled, "An Act for
more effectually repairing the Road from Downham
Market to Barton, and to a Place called the Devil's
Ditch, all in the County of Norfolk."
The Question was put, "Whether this Bill shall
pass?"
It was resolved in the Affirmative.
Message to H.C. that the Lords have agreed to it.
A Message was sent to the House of Commons, by
Mr. Martin and Mr. Roupell;
To acquaint them, That the Lords have agreed to the
said Bill, without any Amendment.
Little Yarmouth Road Bill.
Hodie 2a
vice lecta est Billa, intituled, "An Act for
more effectually repairing the Road from Little Yarmouth to Blythburgh, and from Brampton to Halesworth,
in the County of Suffolk."
Ordered, That the said Bill be committed to the
Consideration of the Lords present this Day:
Their Lordships, or any Five of them, to meet on
Thursday next, at Ten o'Clock in the Forenoon,
in the Prince's Lodgings, near the House of Peers;
and to adjourn as they please.
Fletcher's Petition referred to Judges in Scotland.
Upon reading the Petition of Andrew Fletcher Esquire,
of Saltoun, in the County of Haddington; praying Leave
to bring in a Bill for the Purposes in the said Petition
mentioned:
It is Ordered, That the Consideration of the said
Petition be, and is hereby referred to Lord Glenlee, in
Scotland, and Lord Moncreiff, in Scotland, or in their
Absence, or the Absence of either of them, to Lord
Balgray, in Scotland, and Lord Fullerton, in Scotland, and
that the said Judges, or any Two of them, are forthwith
to summon all Parties before them who may be concerned
in the Bill, and, after hearing all the Parties, and perusing
the Bill, are to report to the House the State of the Case,
with their Opinion thereupon, under their Hands, and are
to sign the said Bill.
Hay et al. v. Rae et al.
Upon reading the Petition and Appeal of John Hay,
Ship Owner in Leith, Thomas Grindlay, Ship Owner
there, and James Wyld, Merchant there, Partners of and
Trustees for The London and Edinburgh Shipping Company, and Registered Owners qua Trustees of the Smack
or Vessel called the Comet; and Robert Bruce, residing
in Leith, One of the Partners and Manager of the said
Company in Leith; complaining of an Interlocutor of
the Judge Admiral in Scotland, of the 8th November
1827, in so far as it repels the Dilatory Defences stated
for the Petitioners; also of an Interlocutor of the said
Judge Admiral, of the 10th of January 1828; also of an
Interlocutor of the said Judge Admiral, of the 6th of
March 1828, in so far as it "finds it not alleged by the
Defenders that any of the Goods on board the Vessel
were lost at Sea at the Time the Vessel was stranded,
but that it is asserted merely, that, in the Confusion
attending the landing of the Goods, some Packages
were lost, and, among others, the Goods in question;"
also of another Interlocutor of the said Judge Admiral,
of the 15th of May 1828; also of an Interlocutor of the
Lord Ordinary there, of the 9th December 1831; also of
an Interlocutor of the Lords of Session there, of the Second
Division, of the 7th February 1832; and also of another
Interlocutor of the said Lord Ordinary, of the 3d March
1832; and praying, "That the same may be reversed,
varied or altered, so far as complained of, or that the
Appellants may have such Relief in the Premises, as
to this House, in their Lordships great Wisdom, shall
seem meet; and that William Rae, Draper in Glasgow,
and Mathew Smellie and John Murdoch his Solicitors
in Scotland, may be required to answer the said
Appeal:"
It is Ordered, That the said William Rae, Mathew
Smellie and John Murdoch may have a Copy of the said
Appeal, and do put in their Answer or respective Answers thereunto, in Writing, on or before Tuesday the
10th Day of April next; and Service of this Order upon
the said William Rae, or upon any one of the said Mathew
Smellie and John Murdoch, his known Agents in the
Court of Session in Scotland, shall be deemed good
Service.
Hay et al. v. Rae et al.
Upon reading the Petition and Appeal of John Hay,
Ship Owner in Leith, Thomas Grindlay, Ship Owner
there, and James Wyld, Merchant there, Partners of and
Trustees for The London and Edinburgh Shipping Company, and Registered Owners qua Trustees of the Smack
or Vessel called the Comet; and Robert Bruce, residing
in Leith, One of the Partners and Manager of the said
Company in Leith; complaining of an Interlocutor of
the Judge Admiral in Scotland, of the 8th November
1827, in so far as it repels the Dilatory Defences stated
for the Petitioners; also of an Interlocutor of the said
Judge Admiral, of the 10th of January 1828; also of an
Interlocutor of the said Judge Admiral, of the 6th of
March 1828, in so far as it "finds it is not alleged by the
Defenders that any of the Goods on board the Vessel
were lost at Sea at the Time the Vessel was stranded,
but that it is asserted merely, that, in the Confusion
attending the landing of the Goods, some Packages
were lost, and, among others, the Goods in question;"
also of another Interlocutor of the said Judge Admiral,
of the 15th of May 1828; also of an Interlocutor of the
Lord Ordinary there, of the 29th November 1831; also of
an Interlocutor of the Lords of Session there, of the Second
Division, of the 7th February 1832; and also of another
Interlocutor of the said Lord Ordinary, of the 3d March
1832; and praying, "That the same may be reversed,
varied or altered, so far as complained of, or that the
Appellants may have such Relief in the Premises, as
to this House, in their Lordships great Wisdom, shall
seem meet; and that William Rae, Draper in Glasgow,
and Mathew Smellie and John Murdoch his Solicitors
in Scotland, may be required to answer the said
Appeal:"
It is Ordered, That the said William Rae, Mathew
Smellie and John Murdoch may have a Copy of the said
Appeal, and do put in their Answer or respective Answers
thereunto, in Writing, on or before Friday the 10th Day
of April next; and Service of this Order upon the said
William Rae, or upon any one of the said Mathew
Smellie and John Murdoch, his known Agents in the
Court of Session in Scotland, shall be deemed good
Service.
Houlditch et al. v. Marq of Donegal.
The House being informed, "That George Augustus
Marquess of Donegal, Respondent to the Appeal of
Edward Houlditch, and others, had not put in his Answer
to the said Appeal, though duly served with the Order
of this House for that Purpose:"
And an Affidavit of the due Service of the said Order
being read;
Ordered, That the said Respondent do put in his Answer
to the said Appeal peremptorily within a Week.
Dame H. Gibson & Sir A. Gibson v. Maitland et al. Appellants Petition for Time for their Case, referred to Appeal Com ee.
Upon reading the Petition of Dame Helen Maitland
Gibson and Sir Alexander Charles Maitland Gibson Baronet,
Appellants in a Cause depending in this House, to which
Alexander Charles Maitland, and others, are Respondents;
praying, "That their Lordships will grant them a
Month's further Time for depositing Prints of their
Case:"
It is Ordered, That the said Petition be referred to the
Appeal Committee.
Sir P. Walker v. Craig, Respondent's Petition to lodge his Case, referred to Appeal Com ee.
Upon reading the Petition of James Gibson Craig
Esquire, Respondent in a Cause depending in this
House, to which Sir Patrick Walker is Appellant; praying their Lordships "to grant him Leave to deposit his
Case:"
It is Ordered, That the said Petition be referred to
the Appeal Committee.
Clyne v. Manson & Goldie, Appellant's Petition for Time for his Case, referred to Appeal Com ee.
Upon reading the Petition of David Clyne, Appellant
in a Cause depending in this House, to which Alexander
Manson and Archibald Watson Goldie are Respondents; praying, "That their Lordships will be pleased
to order that the Time for lodging the Petitioner's
Case may be extended to Saturday the 28th of April
next:"
It is Ordered, That the said Petition be referred to the
Appeal Committee.
Balmer v. Hogarth et al: Balmer v. Hogarth:
Upon reading the Petition of Thomas Balmer, Appellant in a Cause depending in this House, to which John
Hogarth Esquire, and others, are Respondents; and
Appellant in another Cause depending in this House, to
which John Hogarth Esquire is Respondent; praying,
"That their Lordships will be pleased to order that he
may have Leave to withdraw the above Appeals, the
Respondents Agent having signed the said Petition, as
consenting thereto:"
Appeals withdrawn.
It is Ordered, That the Petitioner be at liberty to
withdraw his said Appeals, as desired.
Arundel Port Account delivered.
The House being informed, "That Mr. William
Holmes, from the Commissioners of the Port of Arundel,
attended;"
He was called in; and delivered at the Bar, pursuant
to the Directions of an Act of Parliament,
"An Account of the Receipts and Disbursements of
the Commissioners of the Port of Arundel, from the
31st of December 1830 to the 31st of December 1831;
together with the Report of the said Commissioners."
And then he withdrew.
And the Title thereof being read by the Clerk;
Ordered, That the said Paper do lie on the Table.
Metropolitan Comrs in Lunacy Account delivered.
The House being informed, "That Mr. Browne,
from the Metropolitan Commissioners in Lunacy,
attended;"
He was called in; and delivered at the Bar, pursuant
to the Directions of an Act of Parliament,
"An Account of all Monies received for Licenses by
the Clerk of the Metropolitan Commissioners in Lunacy,
and of all Monies received from and paid out of the
Consolidated Fund to the said Clerk, from the 1st Day
of August 1830 to the 1st Day of August 1831; specifying the several Heads of Expenditure."
And then he withdrew.
And the Title thereof being read by the Clerk;
Ordered, That the said Account do lie on the Table.
The House was adjourned during Pleasure.
The House was resumed by The Lord Chancellor.
Turton & Entwisle Reservoir Bill.
The Earl of Shaftesbury reported from the Lords
Committees, to whom the Bill, intituled, "An Act for
making and maintaining a Reservoir upon Bradshaw
Brook, in the Townships of Turton and Entwisle, in
the Parish of Bolton-le-Moors, in the County of Lancaster, for providing a more regular Supply of Water
in Bradshaw Brook aforesaid, and in certain Rivers
connected therewith," was committed; "That they
had considered the said Bill, and examined the Allegations thereof, which were found to be true; and
that the Committee had gone through the Bill, and
made some Amendments thereto."
Which Amendments were read by the Clerk as follow;
(vizt.)
"Pr. 57. L. 16. After ("made") insert ("or if any
Public Bridge or the Road belonging to the same shall
be thereby destroyed or damaged")
"L. 17. Leave out ("such Person shall
receive")
"L. 19. Leave out ("from") and insert
("shall be made by")
And the said Amendments, being read a Second Time,
were agreed to by the House.
Education, (Ireland,) Petition from Liverpool against proposed Plan of.
Upon reading the Petition of the Protestant Clergymen
and Laymen residing in the Town and Neighbourhood
of Liverpool, whose Names are thereunto subscribed;
praying, "That their Lordships will be pleased to consider, on Protestant Principles, the Interests of the
Poor in Ireland, and not permit any Enactment to
pass for the Promotion of Education in that Country
on any other Ground that the Holy Scriptures,
pure and entire, shall be read in all the Schools; and
that the peculiar Tenets of the Roman Catholic Church
shall in no wise be taught under the Sanction or
Patronage of the State:"
It is Ordered, That the said Petition do lie on the
Table.
Remedies against the Hundred Bill.
A Message was brought from the House of Commons,
by Mr. Bernal and others;
With a Bill, intituled, "An Act to extend the Provisions of an Act of the Seventh and Eighth Years of
the Reign of His late Majesty King George the Fourth,
relative to Remedies against the Hundred;" to which
they desire the Concurrence of this House.
The said Bill was read the First Time.
Ordered, That the said Bill be printed.
Berwick Roads Bill.
A Message was brought from the House of Commons,
by Captain Maitland and others;
With a Bill, intituled, "An Act for more effectually
repairing the Road leading from Berwick-upon-Tweed,
by Ayton Bridge and Ayton, to Dunglas Bridge, and
the Roads from Billie Causeway and Preston Bridge
to join the said Road at or near Houndwood House
and Bankhouse respectively, in the County of Berwick;" to which they desire the Concurrence of this
House.
The said Bill was read the First Time.
Mills & Factories, Petitions for regulating the Hours of Labour in:
(Bishopsgate Street:)
Upon reading the Petition of the Inhabitants of
Bishopsgate Street and the Neighbourhood, whose Names
are thereunto subscribed; praying their Lordships "to
restrict the actual working of Children in all the Mills
and Factories of the United Kingdom to Ten Hours
per Day for Five Days, and Eight on the remaining
Day, and to prevent any Child under Nine Years of
Age being worked in any Factory or Mill:"
It is Ordered, That the said Petition do lie on the
Table.
Maidenhead:
Upon reading the Petition of the Inhabitants of
Maidenhead and its Vicinity, whose Names are thereunto
subscribed; praying their Lordships, "to adopt such
Measures as shall effectually remedy the Evils attendant
on the System of working Children, who are employed
in the various Woollen, Cotton, Silk and other Factories
throughout this Kingdom, at very tender Ages, for
Twelve, Fourteen, Fifteen and even Sixteen Hours
per Day, and often for longer Periods, with no Intermission but for Meals:"
It is Ordered, That the said Petition do lie on the
Table.
Brigham, &c.
Upon reading the Petition of the Inhabitants of the
Townships of Brigham, Greysouthen and Eaglesfield, in
Cumberland, whose Names are thereunto subscribed;
praying their Lordships, "That when the Measure for
shortening the Hours of Labour for Children of a
tender Age employed in Cotton, Woollen, Worsted,
Flax and Silk Mills and Factories, comes before them,
to pass it into a Law with all convenient Speed:"
It is Ordered, That the said Petition do lie on the
Table.
Zemindar of Nozeed Bill, Petition of The East India Co. against.
Upon reading the Petition of the United Company of
Merchants of England trading to the East Indies, under
their Common Seal; taking notice of a Bill depending
in this House, intituled, "An Act for providing for the
Discharge of a Claim in respect of Monies advanced
by the late James Hodges Esquire on Security of the
Lands of the late Zemindar of Nozeed and Mustaphanagur, in the District of Fort Saint George, in the East
Indies, now under the Government of The Honorable
the East India Company;" and praying their Lordships, "That the same may not be passed into a Law,
and that they may be heard by their Counsel against
the same:"
It is Ordered, That the said Petition do lie on the
Table.
Lords summoned.
Ordered, That all the Lords be summoned to attend
the Service of the House on Friday next.
Cruelty to Animals, Petition of Society for Prevention of, against.
Upon reading the Petition of the Members and Friends
of the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals,
whose Names are thereunto subscribed; praying, "That
their Lordships will take into Consideration the Propriety of passing a Law which shall more effectually
place the Animal Creation under the Protection of the
benevolent Part of the Community, than the Act made
in the Third Year of His late Majesty King George the
Fourth, to prevent the cruel and improper Treatment
of Cattle:"
It is Ordered, That the said Petition do lie on the
Table.
Agricultural Labourers Employment Bill.
The Order of the Day being read for the House to be
again put into a Committee upon the Bill, intituled, "An
Act for encouraging and facilitating the Employment
of Labourers in Agriculture;" and for the Lords to be
summoned;
It was moved, "That the House do now resolve itself
into a Committee upon the said Bill."
Which being objected to;
After short Debate,
The said Motion was (by Leave of the House) withdrawn.
Ordered, That the House be again put into a Committee upon the said Bill on Monday next; and that the
Lords be summoned.
Mutiny Continuing Bill reported:
The House (according to Order) was adjourned during
Pleasure, and put into a Committee upon the Bill, intituled, "An Act for continuing an Act passed in the First
Year of His present Majesty, for punishing Mutiny and
Desertion, and for the better Payment of the Army
and their Quarters."
After some Time, the House was resumed:
And The Earl of Shaftesbury reported from the Committee, "That they had gone through the Bill, and
directed him to report the same to the House, without
any Amendment."
Order for 3 a.
Ordered, That the said Bill be read the Third Time on
Thursday next.
Marine Mutiny Continuing Bill reported:
The House (according to Order) was adjourned during
Pleasure, and put into a Committee upon the Bill, intituled, "An Act for continuing an Act passed in the First
Year of His present Majesty, for the Regulation of His
Majesty's Royal Marine Forces while on Shore."
After some Time, the House was resumed:
And The Earl of Shaftesbury reported from the Committee, "That they had gone through the Bill, and directed him to report the same to the House, without
any Amendment."
Order for 3 a.
Ordered, That the said Bill be read the Third Time on
Thursday next.
Clayton's Divorce Bill.
The House (according to Order) was adjourned during
Pleasure, and put into a Committee upon the Bill, intituled, "An Act to dissolve the Marriage of William
Robert Clayton Esquire with Alice Hugh Massy his
now Wife, and to enable him to marry again; and for
other Purposes."
After some Time, the House was resumed:
And The Earl of Shaftesbury reported from the Committee, "That they had gone through the Bill, and made
One Amendment thereto, which he was ready to report,
when the House will please to receive the same."
Ordered, That the said Report be received on Thursday
next.
Adjourn.
Dominus Cancellarius declaravit præsens Parliamentum
continuandum esse usque ad et in diem Jovis, decimum
quintum diem instantis Martii, horâ undecimâ Auroræ,
Dominis sic decernentibus.