OSTERLEY PARK.
Like Syon, of which it has
been described as an architectural miniature, (fn. 43)
Osterley (see plate facing p. 101) is in origin a 16thcentury house largely remodelled by Robert Adam.
In this case, however, Adam's work extended to the
exterior of the house and much less of the old building remains. Despite this, because of the length of
time during which he was employed at Osterley,
Adam's work here is less of a consistent whole than
at Syon. The result has been said to afford 'the best
example of his comparative styles side by side under
one roof. Above all [the house] is distinguished for
fidelity of execution in accordance with the architect's drawings and for its wealth of original furnishings.' (fn. 44)
The house stands on the site of a farm-house
which was bought by Sir Thomas Gresham and replaced by a 'house beseeming a prince'. (fn. 45) Gresham's
house was completed about 1577, (fn. 46) and he entertained the queen there at least twice. (fn. 47) On one occasion he had the 'court' of the house divided in two by
a wall on her suggestion, and this has been taken to
confirm that Gresham's house, like the present one,
was built round four sides of a court-yard. (fn. 48) Glover's
map of 1635, however, seems rather to depict a house
built as an H or half-H, with a double court-yard
(possibly that referred to in the story mentioned
above) in front (i.e. on the north-east). (fn. 49) The four
corner-turrets of the present building, with their
ogee turrets, almost certainly survive, refaced, from
Gresham's house. Virtually nothing more is known
of the house, save that it had a private chapel, (fn. 50) and
remained largely unchanged until the 18th century.
The only one of Gresham's buildings to survive in
approximately its original form is the stable block,
which consists of a half-H of two stories with semioctagonal stair-turrets in the angles. They are of red
brick, with stone and plastered dressings, and retain
some original features, though considerable alterations were made to the interior during the 18th
century. (fn. 51)
In the house, the south tower and south-west
range contain work of the late 17th or early 18th
century. (fn. 52) The decoration of the gallery, which runs
the whole length of the south-west range on the
principal floor, is of the mid-18th century and has
been attributed on grounds of style to Sir William
Chambers. The Child family, who owned the house
in the 18th century, are known to have employed him
elsewhere. The rococo breakfast-room at the far end
of the north-west range also dates from about the
middle of the century. (fn. 53)
In 1761 Francis Child commissioned Robert Adam
to alter the house. Samuel Child continued to employ
him after Francis's death in 1763, and the last of
Adam's designs for Osterley was dated 1780. Adam
rebuilt the house round a courtyard of which the
centre of the north-west side was left open and
spanned by a great Ionic portico (see plate facing
p. 101). (fn. 54) The portico was inspired by Wood's engravings of the Temple of the Sun at Palmyra,
though at Osterley Adam used this feature as a colonnaded screen rather than as an entrance. It gives
access to the courtyard, which Adam raised to firstfloor level, and across which lies the principal entrance
to the house. Apart from the portico Adam left the
exterior very plain, casing it with red brick and rearranging the windows in three regular ranges beneath
a balustraded parapet.
Inside, a series of state apartments was made on
the first floor, where only the gallery and breakfastroom were retained from the previous house. The
seven other state rooms were all, with much of their
furniture, designed by Adam, and provide a wide
range of his style. They occupy one story rather than
two, as at Syon, and consequently give an impression
of breadth instead of height. The earliest rooms are
the library (designs dated 1766), entrance hall (designs 1767), eating-room, and drawing-room, all of
which were completed by 1773. The library is in
Adam's earlier manner, with substantial whitepainted Ionic bookcases, though the ceiling is
characteristically in very low relief. The ceiling of
the eating-room is bolder, and the panels of the walls
are embellished with typical 'grotesque' plasterwork.
The hall, like its more robust counterpart at Syon, is
formal and classical in style, with apses at either end.
To off-set the length and lack of height, Adam in
this case left the apses open, without his usual screen
of columns. As at Syon, groups of arms and armour
in relief ornament the panels between the pilasters
which divide the walls into bays. The drawing-room,
with its ceiling design of pink, blue, and gold ostrich
feathers set in an oval among octagonal coffers, was
described by Horace Walpole as 'worthy of Eve
before the fall'. Thomas Moore, who made carpets
for Syon, made that in this room (and in other rooms
at Osterley) to Adam's designs. Of the three remaining rooms, all in the south-east range, the first to
be completed was the tapestry-room: one of the
Boucher-Neilson Gobelins tapestries which give it
its name is dated 1775. Walpole called this room 'the
most superb and beautiful than can be conceived',
though he noted Adam's increasing obsession with
minute details of design by adding that it was 'enriched by Adam in his best taste, except that he has
stuck diminutive heads in bronze, no bigger than
a half-crown, into the chimney-piece's hair'. The
bed-chamber, dominated by the elaborate domed
bed, of which every detail was designed by Adam,
and the Etruscan room were both completed by
1778. The Etruscan room, as Walpole said, is 'painted
all over like Wedgwood's ware, with black and
yellow small grotesques'. Though Walpole regarded
it as 'a tumble into the Bathos', the room remains of
special interest as the only surviving example by
Adam himself of a style which he initiated and which
was widely copied. Four Etruscan rooms designed
by him elsewhere have disappeared.
The house has been very little changed since Adam
finished his work, and much of his furniture remains
though most of the pictures were removed when
the house was given to the National Trust. (fn. 55) The
very fine collection of books had been dispersed in
1885. (fn. 56)
The park was inclosed by Sir Thomas Gresham
under a licence granted to him in 1565 to impark 600
acres. (fn. 57) Subsequently trespasses suggest that this
was unpopular locally, (fn. 58) but, although Gresham was
allowed to include up to 140 acres of tilled lands in
the park, all of it was probably already inclosed, if
not also used as pasture. Some at least had probably
been inclosed assart from the beginning. The greater
part of the land which Gresham imparked was Osterley farm, which he already held and which comprised
some 200 acres stretching westwards from the house
in Osterley Lane nearly to Heston village. At this
time Osterley Lane seems to have run from Wyke
Green north-westwards close by the house and then to
have approximately followed its present course west
to Norwood Green. (fn. 59) In the same grant as contained
his licence to impark, Gresham also received the
freehold of Osterley Lane itself and of Fawkener's
fields (about 30-40 a.) lying on its east side. It was
probably after this that Osterley Lane began to take
something like its present course farther east, away
from the house though still through the park: in
1635 Glover marked both lines of road, though the
exact course of the newer in his map is not clear at all
points. (fn. 60) In 1959 the road was closed to motor
vehicles. A few months after his first grant, Gresham
secured from the Crown more land called Allcotts,
which enabled him to extend his park to the Norwood boundary, (fn. 61) and in 1567 he was allowed, for a
fine, to inclose 10 acres of Wyke Green. (fn. 62) In 1635 the
park pale seems to have included all these lands,
though except for 20 acres inclosed in a wall or fence
round the house and for some 60 to the east, most of
it was divided into fields. A line of five ponds ran
north-eastwards from the house to the Brent, along
the course of a stream which had formerly marked the
Heston-Isleworth and Norwood-Isleworth boundaries. There were more ponds along the stream
which divided Heston and Norwood just before it
ran into the former one. (fn. 63) These ponds were doubtless made by Gresham, who also built mills beside
them and established a heronry: neither mills nor
heronry survived long after his death. (fn. 64) Some of the
trees he planted were felled during the Civil War (fn. 65)
and the western and southern part of the park was
sold in 1663: (fn. 66) though it later reverted to the same
ownership as the rest of the park most of it was not
reinclosed. (fn. 67)
Before 1746 the park had been laid out, perhaps
by Sir Francis Child (d. 1740), with straight avenues
converging on the same 20-acre inclosure round the
house, in which formal gardens had been planted.
The two ponds nearest the house had been filled in
and the two northern ones combined into one. (fn. 68) A
small circular temple near the house also dates from
this period, and has traditionally been ascribed to
John James. (fn. 69) In 1780 Adam designed the Doric
orangery and semicircular conservatory nearby. (fn. 70)
These were both damaged during the Second World
War but have since been repaired. He also designed
a bridge which is now in ruins and may never have
been used. (fn. 71) It was no doubt while Adam was working on the house that the grounds were laid out again
in the style then fashionable. (fn. 72) The ponds were made
into long lakes or canals, stretching round the south
of the house, and the approach along the old Osterley
Lane was replaced by a more circuitous one along
the newer Osterley Lane and then south to the house:
it was apparently as part of a proposed shorter road
towards London that Adam's bridge was designed. (fn. 73)
The park was also extended into Norwood, where
Robert Child had acquired adjoining land. This new
area (104 a. in 1832) was used in the late 18th century
as a menagerie 'full of birds come from a thousand
islands which Mr. Banks has not yet discovered'. (fn. 74)
Though he admired this and the kitchen-garden,
which he said cost £1,400 a year, Walpole in 1773
considered the rest of the park 'the ugliest spot of
ground in the whole universe'. It had probably not
been laid out on its present plan by this time: a good
many of the trees near the house are in any case said
to have been planted afterwards. (fn. 75) Another later
change was the making of a new drive to the house
from Scrattage Lane (now Jersey Road), about when
the Metropolitan and District Railway was built. (fn. 76)
During the 19th century a good deal of the park was
leased to farmers, and the kitchen-garden was let as a
market-garden. In 1905 192 acres were retained as
pleasure grounds, and about 140 acres were included
in the gift to the National Trust in 1949. (fn. 77)
Except between 1870 and 1883, when it was leased
to the Dowager Duchess of Cleveland, (fn. 78) Osterley
was used by its owners until 1939. During the late
19th century it was the scene of much entertaining,
notably at 'the Osterley Saturday-to-Monday parties'
started by the Earl and Countess of Jersey in the
eighties. These were largely attended by prominent
Conservatives and also by several writers who have
left descriptions of Osterley in their works. Among
these was Henry James, who depicted it as 'Summer
soft' in The Lesson of the Master. (fn. 79) During the First
World War part of the park was used as a motorinstruction camp and the whole property became a
Home Guard school in the Second. (fn. 80) The house was
opened to the public for a few weeks in the summer
of 1939, and in 1951, after it had been transferred to
the National Trust, the grounds were opened. The
house itself was opened in 1953. (fn. 81)