ECONOMIC HISTORY
AGRICULTURE TO c. 1550.
The bishop's
manor was assessed at 32 hides and valued at
£48 in 1086, only £2 less than in 1066. (fn. 1) He held
24¼ hides in demesne in 1066, with 4 tenants
holding 10 hides and 2 mills; by 1086 the
demesne had been reduced to 14 hides by further
subinfeudations and the bishop had 10 chief
tenants holding 20¼ hides and 3 mills. It is not
clear how much of the demesne, the tenants', or
the villeins' land lay in Stepney parish. (fn. 2) Other
land was granted out by the bishops, probably
after 1086, to hold by suit and a money service,
and some was assarted; the grant to Ralph the
clerk in the late 12th century included 2½ a.
assarted land near his house. (fn. 3)
By the 14th century the larger freehold estates
had generally been built up by accumulating
parcels, some as small as half-acre strips. They
reveal an active land market from an early date (fn. 4)
and some, therefore, were not solely held of the
bishop: Poplar manor comprised freeholds held of
Stepney and of the manors of Bromley belonging
respectively to St. Leonard's priory, Stratford, and
to Holy Trinity, Aldgate. (fn. 5) Where freeholders also
held customary land of Stepney it seems sometimes to have been enfranchised and absorbed into
the freehold estate, as on Philpot's manor of Hulls.
Often, however, free and customary land continued to pass separately but to the same heir by
means of surrenders to feoffees and later to the use
of wills, bypassing inheritance custom. (fn. 6)
Customary tenure and works.
Of the 60
husbandmen in 1086, 7 held ½ hide each, 44 held
1 virgate each, and 9 held ½ virgate each. The
46 cottars occupying 1 hide for 30s. were, from
the size of the rent and the proximity of London,
probably craftsmen or market gardeners. (fn. 7)
Labour services had been commuted on c. 1,056
a. by 1362–3. (fn. 8) An incomplete rental, probably c.
1381, of the commuted service on each parcel of
land, indicates 160 customary tenants, 146 with
full and legible entries. It is not clear how many
tenants lived in Stepney; some were citizens of
London and others were also freeholders. (fn. 9) Any
standard size for customary holdings had disappeared, the largest amount held by one person
being 38½ a. and the smallest a plot. Frequent
identification of strips of land by the names of
previous holders, who were nonetheless still living, shows that few holdings passed intact, that
there was a vigorous market for strips of 1 r.
upwards, and that the same process of accumulation occurred as for freehold land. (fn. 10) Strips were
also acquired to build up unified holdings in place
of scattered parcels. (fn. 11)
Partible inheritance was customary, with land passing first to all sons, then to daughters, and then to next
of kin of equal degree. (fn. 12) Some holdings, with or
without a dwelling, were heriotable, but no heriot was
taken if there were no animals. (fn. 13) In 1348–9 holdings
were being surrendered to the use of the holder for life,
to the use of another and their issue, or outright to
another and their heirs. The fine payable was
not a standard rate per acre, but its terms were
not recorded. Mortgages occur in 1383, (fn. 14) and
licenses to let for 21 years and surrenders to uses
of will in 1582. (fn. 15)
Disagreements over customs led to payments by
a group of copyholders to Henry, Lord
Wentworth, in 1588 and by others, headed by Sir
John Jolles, to his son, Thomas, later earl of
Cleveland, for an agreement set out in a Chancery
decree in 1617 and confirmed by Act 1623–4. (fn. 16)
Under the agreement the lord could levy only
specified fines, customs, or services, and could not
grant away any copyhold, although he could grant
the freehold to the holder. It was confirmed that
enfranchised copyholders would continue to have
common of pasture in the wastes and that the
inheritance custom, as before, accorded no rights
to the spouse surviving a holder; fines on admittance were fixed at 16d. an acre, 13s. 4d. for
customary messuages with their courtyards and
gardens, 10s. for a dwelling called a tenement with
courtyards and gardens, 20d. for a cottage that
could not be let for more than £3 a year and 10s.
if let for more, and 16d. for buildings not used as
dwellings. Surrenders for a marriage jointure paid
half the fine. Holders could let for up to 31 years
and 4 months without licence or fine; copyholders
could dig up their copyhold ground at will and fell
timber for their own profit; they were also allowed
waste without forfeiture, whereas tenants for life
or years committing waste could be fined by the
homage. Copyholders could demolish and rebuild
and dig gravel on the waste for building or repairs.
Coheirs in dispute might request a precept for
seven tenants to make a partition. Only the 343
copyholders (and their successors) that had contributed to the composition and were party to the
agreement had the benefit of it. (fn. 17)
Tallage, paid in 1228, and maritagium, paid in
1318, (fn. 18) were not recorded later. A distinction in
1348–9 between copyholders who were free men
and those who were nativi showed no practical
effects, (fn. 19) and was no longer apparent by 1384. (fn. 20)
Citizens of London were among those labelled as
free men and were holding customary land in 1348,
possibly before the commutation of labour services. (fn. 21) If cotmen, hidemen, schirmen, and molmen
mentioned in the early 14th century had once been
distinct classes of peasantry, works by then were
attached to specific strips of arable and not to
holdings or tenants; later in the century most
tenants held more than one category of land. (fn. 22) It
was perhaps unusual for labour services to survive
in the 14th century so near London, but they were
the only service paid for land. Some customary
tenements were held for smokepennies, romepennies or helpennies, and some, including limekilns
and other buildings, for a small money rent. (fn. 23)
Before commutation labour services fell into
two categories. (fn. 24) The first were the week-works
owed by cotmen and schirmen. Schirmen's
works comprised 2,652 works from customary
tenants holding a total of 8½ virgates of land,
with each virgate owing 6 works a week, and 312
works from tenants holding a total of 2 virgates,
each virgate owing 3 works a week; 4 virgates of
the first group were accounted for in Hackney
in 1362–3. (fn. 25) Cotmen's comprised 2,860 works
from tenants holding 11 virgates (5 works a
virgate a week), and 624 works from tenants
holding 3 virgates (4 works a virgate a week); 52
works came from tenants holding half a virgate
of ferthingland (1 work a week); and 260 works
from tenants holding 1 virgate of boundyngland
or bultingland (5 works a week), a total of 3,796
works. There was some confusion over the
acreage of a virgate, but the accounts generally
settled on 20 a. in 1362–3. (fn. 26) Allowances on all
those works were made for serving a manorial
office, for the weeks of Christmas, Easter, and
Pentecost and for feasts falling on a Friday, for
performing specific boon works (below), and carriage inside and outside the manor. In 1335–6
allowances were also made for the schirmen's
works on 6 virgates let for a money rent, possibly
indicating commutation. In 1335–6 the lord used
only 873 works, to hoe and thresh (380 works),
make drainage furrows, purify rye seed of weeds,
bundle straw, and carry to the bishop's castle at
Stortford and to Newgate. After allowances he
sold 2,129, either to the tenant owing the works
or to a third party.
The second category of works comprised specific services owed by molmen and hidemen
besides cotmen and schirmen: nedherths and
benherths, which were ploughing services (1 nedherth ploughed 1 a.), (fn. 27)
wodelodes and timberlodes,
carrying services, nedreps, a reaping service, and
falcones or mowing (1 work mowed 1 a.). The 6
virgates let or commuted owed for each virgate
4 nedherths, 2 benherths, 4 wodelodes, 2 timberlodes, 1 mowing work, and 4 nedreps. In 1335–6
the lord was entitled to 94 nedherths, of which
65 were owed by schirmen and cotmen and 29
by hidemen; he used 8 and sold 602/3 at 6d. each.
Benherths totalled 167½, from schirmen, molmen, and hidemen, and over 152 were sold for
6d. each. Of wodelodes, 97 were owed by cotmen
and schirmen and 233 by molmen and hidemen,
and 301½ were sold at 4d. each. Of timberlodes,
48½ came from cotmen and schirmen and
116½ from molmen and hidemen, and 150¾ were
sold at 6d. Of mowing works, 24½ were done by
cotmen and schirmen and 7 by molmen and
hidemen; the lord used 22. Forty-two nedreps
were owed by schirmen in the harvest and 32 by
molmen and hidemen.
The linking of works to strips may have arisen
from partible inheritance, but the resulting complexity of holdings was probably not the reason
for commutation, since the payments for the
commuted services were equally complex, specifying sums as precise as fractions of a farthing. (fn. 28)
More likely a diminishing need for works led to
commutation: 70 timberlodes and 6 wodelodes
were sold in 1313, and 73 wodelodes, 37 timberlodes, 35 shirman's works, and 450½ cotman's
works were sold in 1318; few of the works were
used in 1335–6. (fn. 29) Most of the demesne having
been let, all the labour services were commuted
by 1362–3, at rates of between 4d. and 2s. an acre
according to type of land to reflect the number
of works each type owed. (fn. 30) Some of the rates
may have changed slightly later in the 14th
century, (fn. 31) and the very different total acreage
given c. 1400 perhaps included Hackney, (fn. 32) but
thereafter the rates remained fixed and therefore
increasingly favourable for the customary tenants.
The bishop's income from his tenants up to
and including 1402–3 was c. £33 from rents of
assize for free and customary tenants and c. £58
for the commuted works. In 1408–9 he received
c. £66 for rents and services together. The
approximate income varied little thereafter, an
inexplicable loss to the bishop. (fn. 33)
Demesne production.
The bishop had 3
ploughteams on his demesne throughout the vill
in 1086, compared with 22 held by the husbandmen, and in 1066 he had only had 6½ teams,
suggesting little interest by him in demesne
farming here. (fn. 34) That much of his 14-hide demesne consisted of the extensive meadow,
pasture, and woods (possibly all the woodland
for 500 pigs plus a surplus) listed in 1086 is made
likely by the fact that in Stepney little wood
belonged to medieval freeholders. (fn. 35) The demesne arable at first was probably concentrated
between Bethnal green and Shoreditch High
Street, overlapping into Hackney and on the
south reaching Whitechapel Road, but lying
mostly in the later hamlet of Bethnal Green. The
demesne around the manor house, possibly as
far west as Cambridge Heath and Bethnal green,
was probably still woodland in 1086 and had
been partially cleared by 1318. (fn. 36) Little is known
of the exploitation of the demesne before the
14th century. Although both Harringay and
Hackney probably had separate collectors within
the manors by the 13th century, their accounts
were often included in those for Stepney, which
also contained totals for other manors. (fn. 37)
Rents of assize were received from an unknown
number of tenants, and the 44 hens and 500 eggs
sold in 1229 were received as rent; cumin,
ploughshares, capons, and hens were customary
rents in 1273. Other receipts were for tallage, aid
and wardpenny, pleas and perquisites of court,
sheriff's aid, pannage, a heriot, fugitive's chattels, and mills in 1229; helpenny and wardpenny
in 1264; and for aid and recognitions of customary tenants in 1273. Other items included sales
of 86 sheep in 1243 and cheese in 1264, when
payments of barley and 13s. 6d. were made for
guarding vines at Stepney.
In the early 14th century, as in the 13th, the
mills, the fishery on the Lea, and escheated
customary holdings were farmed out, but most
of the rest of the demesne was managed directly. (fn. 38) It was used primarily to support the
bishop's household, rather than to produce perishable products for the London market; there
was also some coordination with other episcopal
manors, principally Bencham. The main product at Stepney was grain, and in 1336 stock from
the granary was used to sow 108 a. of wheat, 140
a. of rye, 124 a. of barley, 19½ a. of vetch, and
71 a. of oats, of which 8 a. of oats and 21 a. of
rye were sown in Hackney. (fn. 39) No maslin was
sown but wheat and rye were mixed and, with
barley and oats, used for servants' liveries and
animal feed. Unknown quantities of grain, with
10 quarters of vetch, were sold. (fn. 40) Similar crops
were produced in 1303, 1318, and 1339. A
distinction between old and new crops was
applied to the contents of the granary in 1339,
when long-term storage indicated a lack of interest in their commercial value.
The livestock consisted mainly of working
animals, sheep bought in, and a few breeding
pigs. In 1336 and 1339 six plough-horses, 14
stots, and 16 oxen were kept from year to year,
with replacements bought when needed, and
numbers in 1303 were similar. Other cattle
acquired during the year, mainly as heriots, were
disposed of; 30 cows from Bencham were grazed
in Stepney on the stubble in 1335–6 but were
not included in the stock at the end of the
account. A flock of 43 wethers in 1335 was
supplemented by 14 from Orsett (Essex); disposals, including 14 eaten by the bishop's
household, left 37 at the end of the account.
After Pentecost 108 yearling lambs were sent
from Bencham, and remained at the end of the
account; 140 of the bishop's sheep were grazed
on the stubble. Wool from 39 sheep was delivered to Richard of Hackney, a woolmonger. Pigs
in 1336 formed a small breeding herd of 1 boar
and 2 sows, with 26 adult pigs, 31 under a year,
and 33 under six months at the start of the
account: the household used 33 of the youngest
and 26 adults, most of the latter killed in the
autumn. Twenty pigs and 45 piglets had been
sold in 1303, besides 19 flitches of bacon.
Birds for the table in 1303 included geese,
cranes, cygnets, and peacocks. In 1336 a flock of
62 geese was increased to 138 during the year,
and 62 were eaten. The 9 hens and 1 cock were
augmented by 42 received as rent at Christmas;
29 were eaten, a few were sold and the remaining
10 farmed out for 5s. The bishop still had a cock
and 10 hens in 1339. He also received 450 eggs
at Easter as rent and 55 more were bought in
1335–6; all were used by the household except
for 25 given to the beadle. The only other
important product from the manor was a rent of
300 sacks of lime from the kilns. (fn. 41) Pannage was
usually sold, (fn. 42) 8 a. of vetch were sold growing
for 56s. in 1335–6, while straw in stack fetched
only 20s. because some was needed for the 30
cows from Bencham and the lord's horses. Straw
in the field fetched only 33s. because 38 a. were
ploughed in specifically to improve the soil and
8 a. bundled for thatching. Grazing on the
stubble fetched only 13s. because part was used
for the bishop's sheep. The gardens produced
nothing in 1336 because the trees had not
'sprouted' (presumably fruit had not set), and
the herbage fetched only 6s. 8d., one garden
having been closed off and replanted.
Demesne meadow in the 14th century was
probably the same as in 1550, when it lay in
several places along the Lea from Mill fields in
Hackney to Old Ford marsh in Stepney, with a
small adjoining piece in West Ham (Essex). (fn. 43) In
1336 the bishop had 96 a. of meadow in demesne: hay was made on 82½ a. and mostly used
for his horses. Another 13½ a. were sold in grass
for 78s. Kechenfeld, near the manor house, was
grazed in 1336 for the third year running by
plough animals, as were Northwood and Southwood, the headlands in Combfield, and the
fallow fields. Grazing on headlands around the
winter corn was let for 15s. 6d. a parcel, but
headlands around spring corn fetched only 11s.,
because Broomcroft, sown with oats, had no
headland. By the 14th century demesne income
also included rents for grazing on the earthen
walls along the river banks, such as Nasflete and
Blackwall, and for 'hopes' or enclosures of reeds
such as Goodluckhope near Leamouth. Information on grazing sales in 1318 is not complete,
but grazing at the quabba by the Lea in Hackney
and in the Wylde near Limehouse were let in
1318 up to Michaelmas. Farm of a garden
brought in 15d. for the 5 weeks up to Michaelmas, but nothing thereafter.
Three carters, 3 herdsmen, 3 drivers (ploughmen), a dairy maid, a shepherd, a swineherd,
and a man to look after the animals for the six
winter months, received money wages and corn
liveries in 1336; liveries were also paid to a man
chasing off birds and a man looking after the 30
cows from Bencham. The lord also used some
of the labour services owed by his customary
tenants. (fn. 44) Harvesting on the demesne was mainly
done by the customary tenants owing weekworks: 498 man-days were done by Stepney
tenants and 358 by Hackney tenants. Forty
tenants from Stepney and 30 from Hackney
carried the reaped corn, 32 men loaded and 8
stacked. During the harvest wages were also paid
to another two stackers, to the beadles for Stepney and Hackney and their two grooms, and to
the bishop's servants as overseers.
Threshing was largely paid for as piece-work,
and most ploughing was presumably done by the
wage labourers, as little was done by customary
labour: the bishop used only 33 of c. 260 ploughing services he was entitled to in 1318, and only
8 in 1335–6. Similarly, only a third of his hay
was mown and carried by customary labour, and
most of the lifting, carrying, and the second
mowing were paid for by piece-work. Smithy
work on the ploughs was done by a customary
tenant holding by that service, and some weekworks were used in carriage and other tasks for
the bishop, (fn. 45) but most works were sold. The cost
of labour services may have contributed to their
decline: the 37 ploughs from Stepney and 39¼
ploughs from Hackney working the bishop's
fields during the winter each received 4d. in
1318, while in 1335–6 every man performing
labour services during the harvest received ½d.
in bread and ¼d. in cheese each day, amounting
to 62s. 9½d. that year.
Farm of the demesne.
Between 1339 and 1362
the bishop ceased to grow crops, and let all his
land except some meadow. (fn. 46) In 1362–3 385 a. in
the arable fields were let in 32 parcels ranging
from 2 a. to 30 a., two parcels for 6 years and
the rest apparently by the year. Most of the land
was let at 2s. 6d. an acre, although 45 a. fetched
3s., 82 a. fetched 2s., and 13 a. were let at 1s.
Usually the tenants were local free and customary tenants, such as William Potter, the older
and younger John Reyson, Salamon Walthey the
beadle, and John Shoreditch of Hackney. (fn. 47)
Closes, probably former woodland which had
been sown in 1336, were let as grazing in 1362.
They included Combfield (52 a.) and Newland
(30 a.), let together for 6 years at 40s. to Adam
Chaungeour (Adam of St. Ives), citizen and
merchant, holder of Huscarl manor, and Broomcroft and Northwood, let for 6 years. Of the
demesne meadow, 20 a. were let for between 6s.
8d. and 8s. an acre; another 8¾ a. were let with
Bullivant mill and 1½ a. with Crachlegh mill.
Mowing for the bishop's own use at the manor
house continued on 49½ a. using wage labour. (fn. 48)
Between 1408 and 1439 hay ceased to be made
for the bishop, although his animals grazed for
part of the year in the kitchen garden and a
garden called Derehawe. Grazing had ceased by
1465, when the closes next to the house and the
grange were all let. (fn. 49)
Rents for the demesne arable and from arable
on escheated holdings had fallen by 1383–4. (fn. 50)
About £100, a very high amount, was in arrears
and the rents for farms of land had been reduced
or could not be fully collected. The farm of land,
meadow, and pasture fetched some £20 less than
in 1363 and although eventually increased by
leasing for industrial use, leasing for agricultural
use was not to be so profitable again. The farm
of land in 1384 included fields let as pastures in
1362–3. Combfield and Newland were still let to
Adam of St. Ives but as arable and at 45s. for
the two, of which only 33s. 4d. had been collected; Adam also rented Southwood and
Kechenfeld. Broomcroft and Northwood were
let for the same amount as in 1362, but most of
the other demesne parcels fetched about 6d. less
an acre than in 1362. Lollesworth or Spitelshot
was let as 43 a. to Sir John Philpot at 18d. an
acre (only 12d. an acre collected), instead of three
or more smaller parcels as in the 1360s, although
the total number of parcels had risen to 38 with
the subdivisions of some furlongs. Possibly it
had proved difficult to find enough substantial
tenants.
Low rents continued into the 15th century,
except for Lollesworth, now let to the hospital
of St. Mary without Bishopsgate at 1s. an acre
in 1402 and 2s. in 1409. Typical rates were for
land in the Hyde, which fetched 2s. 6d. in 1363
and only 1s. 4d. in 1465. Between 1439 and 1465,
however, c. 160 a. of the demesne in that area
were amalgamated, with the result that 30 parcels became 14, ranging from 4 a. to 30 a.
Another change was in land use: in Southhyde,
near Whitechapel Road, three parcels possibly
totalling c. 18 a. were let for brickmaking at a
total rent of £10 17s. 4d., helping to restore the
income from the demesne to the level of 1362–
3. (fn. 51)
Land in the marsh cut for hay fetched the
highest rents, although they too fell. Two meadows along the Lea fetched 8s. and 6s. 8d. an acre
respectively in 1362–3 but were 5s. and 6s. in
1383–4. Rent for the Wylde at Limehouse remained the same in 1383–4, (fn. 52) but had fallen
slightly by 1395–6. Most rents for meadow had
recovered slightly by 1398–9 and reached 7s. by
1401–2, but were only about 4s. an acre in
1464–5. (fn. 53) Pasture used solely for grazing fetched
very little throughout the 14th and 15th centuries, despite the proximity of London.
Manorial income also came from escheated
customary holdings: these were usually let from
year to year until granted out again, but by the
late 15th century some remained with the lord.
They were surveyed in 1550 as part of the
demesne, which then comprised 315¾ a. west of
Cambridge Heath Road, enclosed into large
parcels, and 195½ a. including the woods to the
east around the manor house, a total of 511¼ a.
accounting for the 14th- century demesne fields
of 467 a., with c. 50 a. for woodland not given
acreages in the medieval accounts. By 1550,
however, there had been added, mostly from
escheats, 41 a. in and near Eastfield, 17 a. south
of Mile End Road, 30½ a. in Hackney excluding
land by the Lea, and 90 a. unlocated. (fn. 54) Despite
its fall in revenue from the late 14th century,
Stepney generally made the third highest annual
contribution to the bishop's temporal income
after two Essex manors, and except in one
account it always exceeded Fulham. An average
of figures from 13 accounts between 1386 and c.
1480 shows Stepney providing just over 11 per
cent of the bishopric's temporal income. (fn. 55)
Management by piecemeal or short-term leasing ended between 1518 and 1538 when the
manor house and most of the demesne were
divided between two leases granted for long
terms. Small parts of the demesne had already
been granted on long leases: in 1466 Richard
Heyward, citizen and mercer, had been leased a
messuage called the Bakehouse, a building called
the stable and a 'hope' and wall at Limehouse
with 1 r. of land nearby, for 99 years. (fn. 56) A lease
of Spitelhope or Lollesworth (43 a.) to the
hospital of St. Mary without Bishopsgate from
1498 for 99 years was sold to Robert Lorde in
1538 and held by Mr. Polsted in 1550; the
freehold had been sold by the 1560s. (fn. 57) A 21-year
lease from Bishop Tunstall of the manor and
land around the manor house to Thomas Pilkington apparently became void on Tunstal's
translation to Durham in 1530. (fn. 58)
In 1538 a 30-year lease known as the Bishopshall lease was made of the manor house and 97½
a. around it including Bishopswood, 92 a. called
Broomfields, 26 a. in Eastfield, 47 a. in closes
north and south of Mile End Road including
Cordwains in Limehouse, Pawne farm and other
meadow in Hackney totalling 67¾ a., together
with parcage and poundage of the manor. The
lessee was William Goddard of Shoreditch, merchant of the Staple of Calais, who at his death
in 1548 also held the Bishopsfields lease, expiring in 1562, of the demesne fields between
Shoreditch and Cambridge Heath Road, containing 268¾ a., with another 81 a. probably
nearby. (fn. 59) Under his will (fn. 60) the Bishopshall lease
had been sold by 1550, to Sir Ralph Warren,
while the Bishopsfields lease was held by Goddard's widow and her husband Erasmus
Leveningham. The rest of the demesne, comprising holdings of 11 a. and 40 a. meadow by
the Lea in Hackney, the dusthills in Limehouse,
Goodluckhope and other beds of reeds and
osiers, three holdings totalling 472 a. in Stepney
marsh, and 164 a. called the demesne of Hackney, were all let for terms expiring between 1563
and 1590. In 1550 only the two tileyards were
still let on annual tenancies. (fn. 61)
A second lease of Bishopshall, for 80 years
from 1568 at the same rent, was granted by the
bishop in 1546 to Thomas Parsons alias Fairbrother. (fn. 62) Parsons assigned his interest to
Thomas Wilson in 1564. By c. 1582 John Fuller
held a lease for years of Bishopshall, (fn. 63) which he
left to his wife in 1592: (fn. 64) it may, however, have
been only a sublease, as a Bishopshall lease was
sold by Wilson's widow Susan to Philip Wilson
and was thereafter assigned to Simon Jackson
and his wife Elizabeth and Thomas Coleman
and his wife Margaret; its assignment by the
latter to William Smyth in 1643 was part of the
sales to pay the earl of Cleveland's debts. A
21-year lease from 1648, granted by the earl in
1636 to Philip Wilson, was also surrendered to
Smyth in 1643. (fn. 65)
A reversion of the Bishopsfields lease was
granted in 1547 by the bishop to Thomas Parsons and William Mountjoy for 90 years from
1562 at a revised rent. (fn. 66) The lease was held by
John Heath in 1582 (fn. 67) and by Lady Bennet in
1638–9 and 1642, when some parcels sublet to
the earl of Manchester and Mr. Smith (probably
William Smyth) had been built on. (fn. 68)
By 1514–15 the bishop received income, £21
7s. 3d. in 1535, from leases of Stepney marsh,
which was accounted for separately from the
manor. (fn. 69) That land, in the Isle of Dogs, had been
flooded in 1448 and drained by Bishop Thomas
Kemp (1448–89) c. 1488. Kemp held 282 a. as
part of the manor, a further 115 a. for 94 years
and formerly belonging to his free tenants, and
85 a. conveyed by the abbot of St. Mary Graces
and others. The bishop let the 115 a. in 1488 for
40 years to William Marowe, of Stepney, and
seven others of Stepney, London, and Greenwich. When their land was again flooded, before
1524, the lessees enclosed and recovered it. As
part of the bishop's personal estate, the remainder of the 94-year term was sold by his executors
in 1521 to William Goddard, together with the
rent due for the residue of the 40 years, and in
1524 Goddard sold his interest to John Botulph
of London. (fn. 70) The rent agreed in 1488 was
unchanged in 1550. (fn. 71) In 1588 it was said that in
1512 the abbot of St. Mary Graces had let c. 8
a. of flooded land for 80 years to Bishop Richard
Fitzjames, who had let it with c. 130 a. called
the Isle of Dogs, Saunders nase, and the drunken
dock to Thomas Knight, brewer, of London for
80 years. (fn. 72) The acreages were probably higher,
as Knight may have been holding all of the
bishop's 282 a. in Stepney marsh by 1517–18. (fn. 73)
After Knight's death c. 1559, the lease was
surrendered to the lord. (fn. 74)
Another 75 a. adjoining the marsh was let to
Thomas Samme and John Etgose by 1517–18;
the lease had 34 years to run in 1550. (fn. 75) The Wete
marsh, 40 a. reclaimed by Kemp, was let by St.
Mary Graces c. 1529, having been flooded
again. (fn. 76)
Tenants' production.
In 1086 the husbandmen in the vill held arable for 22 ploughteams,
all under cultivation, with meadow to support
all the teams and pasture for the cattle of the vill
with a surplus valued at 15s. By the 14th century,
though a little arable belonging to free and
customary tenants lay among the demesne north
of Whitechapel Road, most lay in open fields
covering the rest of the parish except where
watercourses were bordered by meadow. (fn. 77) Reclaimed land such as Walmarsh (including
furlongs called Landmarsh, Middlemarsh and
Southcroft), Stepney marsh (including furlongs
called Summerleas, Hedwynesfield, Tunamcroft, Newland, and Stowland), and East marsh
were open-field arable c. 1200. (fn. 78) A marsh called
the Wylde, where 6 a. of arable were granted by
the bishop in the 1190s, was probably the Wylde
near Limehouse that was meadow and pasture
in the 14th century. (fn. 79)
Individuals' holdings were very irregularly
spread between different fields c. 1380. (fn. 80) Land
of freehold estates and customary tenants lay
intermixed in small strips in the open fields c.
1400, although there were some closes and
blocks of strips. (fn. 81) The consolidation of strips was
a gradual process, through purchases and exchanges, as was the piecemeal enclosure of
parcels. In 1331 the Crown licensed a freeholder
to exchange 24 a. with the bishop, (fn. 82) and in 1380
two prominent freeholders, John Hadley and
Adam of St. Ives, exchanged 12 a. (fn. 83) Sir Henry
Colet purchased copyhold parcels, some already
in closes within the open fields, from several
holders in the late 15th century to form an estate
of three large blocks. (fn. 84) Such practices eventually
created the field pattern shown in the first plan
of the parish in 1703. (fn. 85)
Field names from c. 1200 do not indicate any
unified system of communal management or of
rotation within the manor or parish. The only
reference to grazing on the stubble concerned
the demesne and the lord's stock, (fn. 86) probably
because extensive pasture on the waste and the
meadows reduced the need for communal grazing on the arable.
Arable farming was probably dominant
throughout the Middle Ages for both free and
customary landholders. Evidence, however, is
sparse: only 4 out of c. 120 commissary court
wills between 1374 and 1500 mention agricultural produce or stock. (fn. 87) More frequent
references to land do not indicate who was
working it or how. The 80 a. demesne arable
of Pomfret manor in the Isle of Dogs, which
was owed harvest works in 1323, had by 1362
been abandoned to sheep grazing, but perhaps
only because the manor house was no longer
occupied. (fn. 88) Tenants living in the Marsh continued to cultivate arable until the floods of the
mid 15th century: the will of William Potter
of the marsh in 1380 mentioned 2 a. of wheat,
2 oxen, 1 horse, and 2 plough-teams in 1380. (fn. 89)
Tenants of Stepney, Poplar, and Pomfret lost
their holdings in the floods, which allowed a
radical changed in land ownership and use:
after the Isle of Dogs was reclaimed in 1488
pasturing became the dominant agriculture
there. (fn. 90)
In 1364 Walter Page had freehold, leasehold,
and customary land in Stepney, of which 7 a.
were sown with wheat, 7 a. with barley, 8¾ a.
with tares, and 14. a. sown with mixed wheat
and barley; 2 a. were meadow and 3 a. fallow. (fn. 91)
In 1383 c. 5 a. of pasture in northern Poplar
were let to a Londoner, who in 1385 sublet it
at a rent which suggests that it was mown for
hay, rather than used merely for grazing. (fn. 92)
Adam of St. Ives in 1393 had c. 50 a. of wheat,
23 a. of barley, and 16 a. of beans, peas, and
vetches on 126 a. of arable in northern Poplar
and Limehouse, but had only 16 a. of pasture
and 5 a. of meadow. When the land was let in
1401–2 the meadow and pasture were let for
between 2s. 6d. and 3s. an acre. (fn. 93)
Gardens at the manor house probably produced only top fruit as they were being grazed
by stock; the fruit was valued at 4s. in 1362–3,
and ½ a. formerly customary arable was let by
the lord as garden for 4s. (fn. 94) Freehold messuages
in Mile End Road east of White Horse Lane
included a garden in 1325. (fn. 95) In 1383–4 the farm
of a garden in Haliwellstreet once held by Gilbert at Stone was let for a reduced rent of 6s. 8d.
to John Sperhankes, whose garden was in the
hands of the lord in 1401–2 and let for the same
rent to Richard Loxley, spicer of London. (fn. 96)
Another garden in Haliwellstreet was granted to
Adam Kareswell in 1385 for a new customary
rent. (fn. 97) The abbey of St. Mary Graces paid an
unchanged rent for Champeneys garden, near
Wapping, c. 1380 and c. 1400, as did the abbey
of St. Osyth (Essex) for a garden next to
Whitechapel church. (fn. 98) John Hadley also had a
garden near the latter, part of his freehold
estates, (fn. 99) and in 1464–5 2 a. of demesne in
Southhyde north of Whitechapel Road were
let as a garden. (fn. 1) Three gardens lay at the east
end of Poplar street c. 1400, held by customary
tenants of Stepney manor. (fn. 2)
MEDIEVAL MILLS. (fn. 3)
In 1086 the bishop
held in demesne four mills which rendered £4
15s. 8d. In addition a mill on the Thames
which had been held by Doding in 1066 was
held by Hugh de Berners, a mill on the Lea
which had been built since 1066 was held by
Edmund son of Algot', and an unlocated mill
worth 20s. was held by Alwin son of Brihtmar,
as in 1066. (fn. 4)
In 1228–9 the bishop received, besides issues
from the mill of Hackney, rent for a fulling
mill and a water mill in Stepney. In 1243 five
mills paid him rent, including one held for a
rent of assize and one held at fee farm by Ralph
Alwy' (possibly for Aswy), and in 1264 three
mills were held at farm. (fn. 5) In 1313 only rents
from a water mill and a windmill were recorded. (fn. 6)
In the 14th century the bishop had two demesne water mills. Bolyfan (Bullivant) mill was
let in 1318, 1335–6, (fn. 7) 1362–3, (fn. 8) and, as a fulling
mill, in 1383–4 and 1391–2. (fn. 9) It was let on
different terms by 1395–6 and was being repaired in 1401–2. (fn. 10) In 1438–9 rent was recorded
from a fishery at the mill and meadows near it
but not from the mill itself. (fn. 11) The mill presumably stood on the watercourse in Bow and
Hackney called Bullivant river in 1550, possibly
where it joined the Lea on the parish boundary. (fn. 12)
Crachehegh or Crachegg fulling mill paid
rent to the bishop in 1318 and was repaired.
In 1335–6 only part of the rent was received,
because of disrepair, and a new waterwheel
was put in. (fn. 13) The mill was not mentioned in
1362–3 and presumably had been alienated or
abandoned; in 1550 a parcel of meadow, probably in Hackney, was called Crathe's mill. (fn. 14)
Land at the windmill in 1272 was bounded
by the later Ratcliff Highway and Cable Street,
in Wapping-Stepney, probably the bishop's
windmill that lay next to land in the upper
fields of Shadwell manor in the late 13th
century. (fn. 15) The bishop's windmill was let in
1313 but in 1318 it was in ruins and without
a miller. (fn. 16) In 1335–6 the windmill was let and
part of the mill was renewed. (fn. 17) It was again in
ruins and could not be let in 1362–3, and was
so recorded thereafter until last mentioned in
1395–6. (fn. 18) In 1386 an acre between two highways in Wapping-Stepney lay next to
Brendmill (Burnt mill) hill, whose name survived in 1427 (fn. 19) and may have been that of the
ruined windmill. Another windmill seems to
have stood in the demesne fields (north of the
Colchester road) where a furlong was called
Windmillshot in 1318, (fn. 20) and a close was called
Millfield in 1362. (fn. 21)
Pomfret manor had a windmill in 1322,
valued at 1 mark. (fn. 22) Simon Oliver conveyed a
freehold windmill in Stepney to Richard of
Croydon, citizen and fishmonger, before
1349. (fn. 23)
The mill held by Doding in 1066 and Hugh
de Berners in 1086 may have stood in the parish
of St. Botolph Aldgate, where Dudding pond lay
and where Sir Ralph de Berners held two mills
in 1274–5. It was taken into the site for the
hospital of St. Katharine. (fn. 24)
In 1218 St. Paul's granted Wapping mill
with the right to grind corn for the common
bakehouse of the chapter to Terricus (Theodoricus) son of Edrich of Aldgate and his heirs
to hold freely for 5 marks a year, (fn. 25) which was
reduced in 1231 to 4 marks a year in return for
surrendering the right to grind the chapter's
corn. (fn. 26) Terricus then granted a moiety to his
brother Adam but by 1239 they had sold the
mills to the hospital of St. Thomas of Acre,
which was to pay the rent to the dean and
chapter and 1 Ib. of pepper to Terricus and his
heirs. (fn. 27) In July 1239 Terricus's widow
Florence claimed a third of the mills as
dower. (fn. 28)
In 1269 the hospital granted their mills at
Wapping to Richard of Ewell and his wife Maud,
but in 1274–5 Richard of Ewell granted the
property back to the hospital to endow a chantry.
Richard's widow Aubrey and her husband Ralph
de Munchensy recovered a third as dower, and
Richard's son Richard of Ewell confirmed the
grant to the hospital in 1286. (fn. 29) The property
continued in the possession of the hospital until
the Dissolution when it passed to the Crown.
The mill house had a wharf and dock adjoining
in 1537, and seems to have been used as a
brewhouse, as was another house on the property. (fn. 30)
Despite the grant to the hospital, one mill at
Wapping was granted with the manor of Ewell,
both held for life by Aubrey wife of Ralph de
Munchensy, by Eleanor daughter of Richard de
Ewell to her nephew Richard son of John
Neyrnuit in 1292. This mill continued in the
Neyrnuit family until c. 1400, but may have
passed to the hospital, as its later history is
unknown. (fn. 31)
Shadwell mill was among purchases
confirmed between 1189 and 1198 by Bishop
Richard Fitzneal to Brice of Stepney, (fn. 32) who
had probably obtained the mill on his marriage to Catherine, daughter of Salomon of
Stepney. Brice's estate passed to his nephew
Benet of Maneton, who in 1222 as Benet of
Stepney sought to recover the mill from
Brice's widow Catherine and her husband
Adam le Despenser. At about that time
Benet sold the estate and mill to Bishop
Eustace of Fauconberg (d. 1228), to whom
in 1223 Catherine's brother Daniel quitclaimed the mill. (fn. 33) The bishop left Shadwell,
including the mill, to the dean and chapter
of St. Paul's. A rental of before 1285 gave no
income from the farm of the mill. (fn. 34) When
Shadwell manor was farmed to Richard the
bishop's beadle in 1334, the mill was in ruins
and the watercourse dried up. (fn. 35) In 1652 the
mill existed but was out of use. It lay by the
Thames among extensive tidal channels. (fn. 36)
The Cressemills or Crash mills on the Thames
near East Smithfield existed by 1233, when a
judgement divided the tithes from the mills and
its adjoining premises between the churches of
Stepney and St. Botolph Aldgate. (fn. 37) John Elylond and his wife Clemence granted rent from
the Crash mills in 1265. (fn. 38) The mills were acquired by Sir John Pulteney, lord of Poplar
manor; he granted them with the manor in 1347
to Humphrey de Bohun, earl of Hereford and
Essex, who leased them back for 50 years. The
mills were held of the bishop for fealty only. (fn. 39)
They were settled by Pulteney's son Sir William
in 1362 (fn. 40) and passed with Poplar manor to the
abbey of St. Mary Graces, which kept them until
the Dissolution. (fn. 41) In 1535 the mills were farmed
out for a rent of flour. (fn. 42) In the 1530s the site,
between Nightingale Lane and Wapping marsh,
included the newly-built Katharine Wheel and
a wharf, six other tenements and a garden, the
Swan's Nest or Hermitage with a wharf, two
gardens and a pond, and Crashmills meadow;
the mills themselves were not mentioned. (fn. 43)
On the Lea the mill held by Edmund son of
Algot' in 1086 (fn. 44) was evidently the fuller's water
mill called Algodsmill. Abandoned because of
lack of water, it was restored by Sir John
Pulteney by means of a trench from the river. It
was part of the estates held by Humphrey de
Bohun, earl of Hereford and Essex, in 1355 (fn. 45) and
was presumably the fulling mill among the
appurtenances of Poplar manor settled by Sir
William Pulteney. (fn. 46) It passed to St. Mary
Graces (fn. 47) but was not specified among the abbey's property in the 1530s. (fn. 48)
Old Ford mill was granted by Lettice, wife
of William le Blund of Stepney, to the priory
of St. Helen, Bishopsgate. In 1230 William
confirmed that after her death a moiety that
they held would revert to St. Helen's. (fn. 49) Its
later history is uncertain, as is that of a water
mill at Old Ford belonging to the priory of St.
Bartholomew, West Smithfield, which obstructed the Lea in 1355. (fn. 50) John Henley, clerk,
leased a water mill at Old Ford to Adam
Smale, baker of Stratford Bow, who blocked
the Lea adjoining the mill with turves and
water-gates, flooding neighbouring meadows
in 1394. (fn. 51) It is possible that these are all the
same mill.
In 1287 a water mill at Stratford Bow called
Rothleys mill was released by John son of Sir
William de Chishull to Ralph Crepyn of
Aldgate. (fn. 52) In 1303 Ralph granted to Walter of
Gloucester, his son, 2 mills and other property
in Stepney, Hackney, Stratford, and elsewhere. (fn. 53)
The Land mills were evidently the water mills
which belonged to Sir Stephen Ashewy and were
excluded from his release of the rest of his
Stepney estate in 1324. (fn. 54) In 1412 two water mills
in Stratford Bow called Land mills were quitclaimed by Henry, Lord Scrope of Masham, to
John Lynne of Stratford Bow, (fn. 55) who in 1391 had
been described as a baker. (fn. 56) By 1579 the mills
formed a capital messuage called the Land Mills,
held by Henry Alington in right of his wife
Anne, widow of Richard Elkyn. (fn. 57) Early in the
17th century Monks mead, formerly belonging
to the dean and chapter of Westminster, was
claimed as part of the Land mills. (fn. 58)
A third of two mills in Stratford Bow was
granted in 1353 by William of Causton, citizen
and mercer, and his wife Christian to William
of Tuddenham, citizen and mercer, and his wife
Christine, being Christian's dower. (fn. 59) The mill
was used for grinding corn in 1360. (fn. 60)
Westminster abbey is said to have purchased
a mill in Stratford (Essex) from Robert Alleyn,
citizen and fishmonger, in 1364–5, and the reversion of a mill and 12 a. from him in 1375–6.
In 1392 Robert Alleyn and his wife Maud were
granted a corrody in return for the mill at
Stratford, (fn. 61) perhaps the mill with 35 a. in Stepney and Stratford Bow granted by Alleyn to
feoffees in 1371 and quitclaimed to him and
Maud in 1379. (fn. 62) An estate in Stepney which was
assigned to the abbey's chamberlain in 1381 has
been identified as the mill at Stratford (Essex)
given by Ailnod of London. (fn. 63) The abbey's mill
or mills may have been in the part of Stepney
manor that lay in West Ham (Essex). Two water
mills and land in Stepney, granted in 1520 by
Lancelot Lyle and his wife Alice to William
Knight, lay partly in Essex and so presumably
on the Lea. (fn. 64)
Unlocated mills included one claimed by the
bishop in 1228 from Hugh le Fraunceys,
whose grant by a previous bishop had not
received the assent of the chapter. (fn. 65) If he
succeeded the bishop, who was establishing
overlordship, probably made a new grant to
Franceys. (fn. 66) In 1233 Henry Bucointe successfully claimed from Peter son of Roger two
mills and appurtenances in Stepney. (fn. 67)
Robert de Mordon bought a mill from Edmund Crepyn in 1334. It was regained by
Robert's daughter Mary in 1348 after the death
of his brother William, who had taken possession
illegally. In 1348 it was held with 5 a. of the dean
and chapter of St. Paul's by fealty and a small
rent, and was in bad condition. (fn. 68)
WOODS.
In 1086 the bishop's extensive demesne woods fed 500 pigs and were worth 40s.;
his tenants' woods were probably not in what
became Stepney parish. (fn. 69) The indeterminate
boundary with Hackney near the manor house
and the nature of nearby closes in the 14th
century suggest that woodland stretched eastward from Bethnal green in 1086 and had been
divided, enclosed, and partly cleared by 1318.
Such closes may have included Combfield, Newland, Woodland, and Redding: although
sometimes used for crops, they differed from the
other arable in having no subdivisions; all, except for Redding, were let as whole units and
not subdivided. (fn. 70) Mention of the bishop's woods
east of Bethnal green before 1285 suggests that
the woodland may have reached farther south,
over the area later called Broomfields. (fn. 71)
In 1291 the bishop was granted free warren,
probably as a preliminary to emparking, and in
1292 his petition to enclose two woods near his
manor house for deer and other game was seen
as a threat by Londoners to their traditional
hunting rights. (fn. 72) By 1335 the woods around the
manor house were used for grazing. (fn. 73) In 1363
the grazing in Southwood was let with 22 a.
called Kechenfeld nearby, while Northwood was
let with Broomcroft, which separated the two
woods, as a pasture for 6 years. (fn. 74) The acreage of
the woods probably did not exceed 50 a. by this
time: they were included in 97 a. let with the
manor house in 1550, (fn. 75) but all the former demesne to the east amounted to only 48 a. in
1703. (fn. 76) In 1539 the manor was said to include
26 a. of woodland, with little timber left on it. (fn. 77)
FISHERIES.
The bishop received rent for the
farm of a fishery in 1263–4. (fn. 78) His fishery at
Bullivant was let in 1313, for 1 mark a year, and
in 1318. (fn. 79) The rent remained 13s. 4d. in 1335–6
and 1362–3, (fn. 80) but from 1383 to 1399 that sum
was accounted for by the beadle of Hackney and
from 1402 it was not recorded. (fn. 81) By 1439, however, a new farm of £1 18s. 4d. was accounted
for under Stepney for a fishery at Bullivant mill,
let to the widow of Richard Colliers with ½ a. at
Algoryshyde. (fn. 82) In 1464–5 £2 6s. 8d. was received
for the fishery at Bullivant mill with Lockacre
and the hopes containing ½ a., let to Laurence
Fanne. The bishop also received 40s. for all the
fishing and fowling in Stepney marsh, which had
been flooded 15 years previously, together with
a moiety of the reeds, let for 10 years to Richard
Daniel and Thomas Shipman. (fn. 83) The fishery at
Bullivant mill was later let to Sir John Shaa and
by 1518 to Sir John Raynesford at the same rent
as in 1464–5. (fn. 84) In 1550 it was included in the
Bishopshall lease. (fn. 85) The royalty of fishing on the
Lea was valued at £5 in 1642 and 1652. (fn. 86)
INDUSTRY TO c. 1550.
Bakers supplied London by the early 13th century, paying city tolls
for carrying bread from Bromley and Stepney; (fn. 87)
in 1356 the City imposed a higher toll on carts
carrying wheat or flour from Stratford Bow than
on other carts. (fn. 88) Some millers at Stratford may
also have been bakers: John Lynne, holder of
Land mills, was so described in 1391. (fn. 89)
By the 15th century bakers and brewers of
Ratcliff and Limehouse probably also helped to
victual ships. Together with men in the lime,
brick, and ironwork industries (below), they
were often among Stepney's leading inhabitants,
with substantial landholdings and financial and
family connections with Londoners. Roger
Clerk, baker, rented grazing along the river wall
at Limehouse in 1391–2, (fn. 90) and bakers at Limehouse made wills in 1430 (Simon Cok), 1455
(William Canon), and 1472 (John Austyn), as
did Thomas Aubrey of Stepney in 1440. (fn. 91) Early
16th-century bakers from Limehouse, Ratcliff,
and Stratford Bow supplied royal ships refitting
in the Thames. (fn. 92)
Brewers making wills included Vincent Syward of Limehouse in 1419 and William Brigge
of Stepney, who had pledged his goods as security to citizens of London, in 1449. (fn. 93) John
Debenham of Limehouse was mentioned in
1430 and 1450, William Peste of Stepney in
1456, and Thomas Mott of in 1449, possibly
the Thomas Mote of Ratcliff who died in
1461. (fn. 94) John Allardson of Ratcliff, who paid a
subsidy as an alien in the 1450s, pledged goods
in 1461, and Thomas Mason of Stepney, with
two others, was granted the goods of a London
cooper as security in 1475. (fn. 95) William Potter,
priest and member of a Poplar family, left a
brewhouse to Nicholas Salle or Sawlle of Stepney and his wife Alice with land in Ratcliff in
1487; in 1496 Salle left a brewery called the
Cherker and a brewery at Newbrigge, besides
land in Poplar and Ratcliff. (fn. 96)
In 1549 meat for the king's ships at Ratcliff
was supplied from 1,017 oxen brought there
from outside London. The miller of Ratcliff
(probably of Shadwell mill) let a close near the
slaughterhouse to hold the animals, and men
and buildings were hired for the slaughter and
salting. Although the scale of the operation
exceeded Ratcliff's own resources, some local
facilities already existed for such provisioning. (fn. 97)
Lime used on the manor for building repairs
in 1335 came from the 300 sacks received by
the bishop each year as render for the limekilns
near the later Limehouse dock. (fn. 98) In 1362–3 the
manor received only 25 sacks and bought 42
more. (fn. 99) In 1398–9 the manor received 50 sacks
of lime from the kiln of one tenant, and 25 each
from the kilns of another four. (fn. 1) The same
renders were paid in 1401–2 and 1408–9. (fn. 2)
Money rents of 8d. or less were also paid c.
1400 for the kilns of four tenants. (fn. 3) The tenants
of the limekilns included in the 14th century
members of the Dike, Golding, atte Hatch,
and Kent families, and William Edwin and
Thomas Warris, who made wills in 1404 and
1443 respectively. (fn. 4) Several also held customary land or leased demesne in Limehouse,
including Peter atte Hatch (d. 1405), who was
beadle of Stepney in 1391–2. (fn. 5) In 1464–5 the
five kilns rendered 25 sacks each and all the
lime was sold. (fn. 6) The same render was due in
1517–18, when two kilns formerly in the tenure of Edmund Ratcliff were unlet. (fn. 7)
Richard Etgose or Etgoos, yeoman, had at
his death in 1503 an extensive limeburning
operation at Limehouse and Greenhithe
(Kent). In 1491 he had taken a 99-year lease
of the Dusthill, with a hope enclosed from the
marsh, where he built a new house and had a
chalk kiln, a wharf, and a chalk boat called the
Katharine. He also had four tenements adjoining his dwelling with a tanhouse, a beerhouse,
and 28 a. of marsh, besides four copyhold
tenements and a wharf and garden which he
had rebuilt into six or eight tenements, another
kiln at Greenhithe, a little arable, and 32 a. in
the marsh let to butchers. (fn. 8) The property all
passed to his eldest son John, also a brickmaker, and then to John's eldest child
Elizabeth and her husband Richard Driver (d.
1549). Driver left his limekiln and other property to his younger son George. (fn. 9) The property
seems to have included two kilns and two
wharves that had belonged to St.
Bartholomew's hospital and had been granted
to the mayor and corporation of London in
1547; (fn. 10) those kilns may have derived from a
messuage by the limekiln in Stepney, late of
John Elmeshale, clerk, in 1399. (fn. 11)
In 1524 Richard Driver, John Etgose, and
another limeburner were accused of trying to
fix the price of lime sold in London. A new
rate was agreed but in 1526 they refused the
prices which the City set. (fn. 12) John Crow supplied 6 loads of lime to Henry VIII. (fn. 13) Other
limeburners at Limehouse included Richard
Deacon, who made a will in 1563, William
Becket (fl. 1566), and William Harman (fl.
1593). (fn. 14)
A licence to dig clay for tiles was granted in
1366 by John, son and heir of Stephen of
Cambridge, holder of a moiety of Ewell manor,
to John Wendover, citizen, possibly the holder
of the other moiety. By c. 1400 the manor was
sometimes also called Tilehouse, and in 1401–
2 the holder was summoned for not cleaning
ditches at the tilehouse. (fn. 15) Brickmaking seems
to have been concentrated in Whitechapel.
Between 1401 and 1409 ½ a. of demesne in
Southhyde near Whitechapel Lane, north of
Whitechapel Road, was let for a 'lompette',
presumably for making tiles or bricks, at a very
high rent, (fn. 16) and the Whitechapel Lane of 1409
may have been that called Brick Lane by
1485. (fn. 17) In 1438–9 the demesne fields between
Shoreditch and Cambridge Heath Road included both 'lompettes' and 'tilehouseland', (fn. 18)
and by 1465 all but 2 a. of 25 a. in Southhyde
were let for brickmaking to John Caunton,
John Kendall, and Henry Etwell, the first of
whom described himself as a brickmaker in his
will proved in 1476. (fn. 19) Nicholas Fakys, brickmaker of Whitechapel, made bequests of
bricks in his will c. 1454. (fn. 20) The lease of 18 a.
in Spitalfield to Thomas Rooke at a high rent
in 1464–5 suggests that this may also have been
for brickmaking. Rooke's property passed to
his son-in-law John Brampston or Bramston
(d. 1504), who moved to Whitechapel and
bequeathed 10,000 bricks each to the London
Charterhouse, St. Bartholomew's priory,
Smithfield, and his son Hugh. (fn. 21) Hugh (d. by
1539) was also a brickmaker and in 1509–10
held a 'brickplace' on the south side of Spitalfield. (fn. 22) Hugh's eldest son John was a mercer,
but the family continued to live in
Whitechapel and also held considerable copyhold property in Whitechapel and Stepney. In
1550 the garden of John Bramston lay east of
Brick Lane near its junction with Whitechapel
Road. He also held one of the two tileyards in
Stepney manor, the other being held by John
Hall, of another Whitechapel brickmaking
family; both lay on the east side of Brick Lane
and were let annually. (fn. 23)
In 1511 part of Cordwainers mead in Limehouse was let for brickmaking to John Etgose
for 10 years at an increased rent, with the
obligation to maintain the river walls around
the meadow between Limehouse and Ratcliff. (fn. 24) It may have been the brickplace that
Richard Driver left with all the bricks and
profits to his wife Elizabeth in 1549. (fn. 25)
Shipbuilding at Ratcliff was recorded in
1354, when timber was brought for the king's
ships, and 1356, when 50 ship's carpenters of
Norfolk and Suffolk were impressed to work
on ships and barges; (fn. 26) presumably small boats
and merchant ships were already being built
there. A galley of Edward III at Ratcliff, with
tackle and utensils from other vessels, was
ordered to be sold in 1380. (fn. 27) In 1421 a ship
was built for John, duke of Bedford, at the
limekilns in Stepney. (fn. 28) In 1485 George Cely,
merchant of the Staple of Calais, had his ship
the Margaret Cely brought to Blackwall and
bought nails and bread for her from Ratcliff
tradesmen. (fn. 29) From 1512 several royal ships
were fitted out at Blackwall and Wapping,
including the Mary Rose, (fn. 30) for which a dock
was made at Blackwall. Local smiths, ironmongers, and carpenters supplied materials. (fn. 31)
Four workshops and gardens at Mile End
were granted to John Wolward, smith, in 1364. (fn. 32)
Other smiths included John Fotheringay of
Poplar, who made a will in 1412, John Hudson
of Ratcliff, recorded in 1466 and 1468, (fn. 33) Christopher Saunderson of Poplar, William Brett of
Stepney, and John Ernest of Mile End, who
made wills in 1479, 1481, and 1519 respectively.
William Ivy of Limehouse was overseer of a will
in 1537. (fn. 34)
Stepney residents involved in maritime trade
included a shipman who owed a large sum in
1423 for beer, probably for his crew, to another
resident, (fn. 35) and John Norfolk, merchant, who
with others was licensed in 1452 to collect
merchandise in Denmark, Norway, and Iceland. (fn. 36) John Warde of London, vintner,
formerly of Portsmouth and then Ratcliff, victualled Calais in 1478. Lightermen were
mentioned in 1479. (fn. 37)
John Bogays, a potter living at Mile End c.
1360, had considerable property there including 3 workshops. (fn. 38) Other craftsmen included
Walter Colt, brasier of Mile End, in 1434, and
William Shelfield, arrowsmith of Stepney, in
1444, (fn. 39) William Saber of Stepney, white tawer
(1457), (fn. 40) John Pole (1454), Edmund Walsh
(1456), and John Bothe (1466), all tailors of
Stepney, (fn. 41) Richard Laurence, fuller, and John
Yardley, tailor (both 1454), and William Lynston, tailor (1461), all of Stratford Bow. (fn. 42) John
Bowle of Southwark had an oil mill in Stepney
in 1495. (fn. 43) Henry Basse, barber of Ratcliff,
made a will in 1500. (fn. 44)