COMMUNICATIONS (fn. 1)
Roads
Birmingham's position on the edge of the sandstone ridge overlooking the marshy valley where the
Rea and Tame meet is thought to have made the
town a centre of local communications from an early
date. The most convenient crossing of the Rea was
at its nearest point to Birmingham. The sandstone
ridge provided a practicable route between the
centres to the south-west - Worcester, Droitwich,
and Bromsgrove - and Lichfield and Tamworth to
the north-east; roads converged from the south-east
to cross the Rea between Digbeth and Deritend;
and the gravelly, largely uncultivated land to the
north-west of Birmingham allowed the establishment of many easy tracks to the towns and villages
of south Staffordshire. (fn. 2)
The only Roman road passing near Birmingham
was the Icknield Street or Rycknield Street, (fn. 3) and
its existence had little bearing, if any, on the development of Birmingham. Only small fragments of the
street in the immediate neighbourhood of Birmingham seem to have survived into the Middle Ages,
though longer stretches are to be seen in Staffordshire, Worcestershire, and south Warwickshire, and
the line of the street which still exists in Sutton
Park extended, until the middle of the 19th century,
for about a mile into Perry Barr. (fn. 4) Modern roads in
the county borough of Birmingham which follow
the course of the street are Lifford Lane, the
Pershore road at Stirchley, (fn. 5) Great Hampton Row,
and Wellhead Lane. The street, which ran between
Bourton on the Water (Glos.) and Templeborough
(Yorks.), crossing the Watling Street at Wall
(Staffs.), entered King's Norton parish from Beoley
and, crossing the Rea at Lifford, ran in a straight
line until it reached the high ground near Selly Oak.
There it made a quarter turn to the east, and
followed a straight course towards Wall, crossing
the Tame at Holford, a few hundred yards east of
Perry Bridge. The theory that the Rycknield Street
made a circuitous westward bend as it passed
Birmingham is no longer accepted. (fn. 6) Another road,
from Droitwich through Bromsgrove to Birmingham, may have been a Roman road joining the
Rycknield Street at King's Norton; (fn. 7) it is, however,
more commonly regarded as an ancient saltway. (fn. 8)
Of the crossings of the Rea near Birmingham,
three were on routes to Aston church from parts of
Aston parish on the far side of the Rea. One connected Watery Lane with the modern Vauxhall
Road, on the line of the present Lawley Street, (fn. 9) the
second was at Saltley, and the third, still called Aston
Church Road, crossed between Washwood Heath
and Holborn Hill. Probably none of these was as
satisfactory as the crossing between Deritend and
Digbeth: the inhabitants of Deritend and Bordesley,
whose route to their parish church was by the
Watery Lane crossing, (fn. 10) were given permission in
1381 to build their own chapel on the ground that
the river was often impassable, (fn. 11) and in the early
16th century the inhabitants of Ward End, whose
route was by Aston Church Road, were given
similar permission for the same reasons. (fn. 12) At
Deritend the river split into two arms, and was
apparently fairly easy to ford. (fn. 13) Encroachment on
the road through Deritend was reported in 1276. (fn. 14)
From the Deritend crossing of the Rea local routes
radiated out to Stechford, to Yardley by way of the
New Bridge, and to Moseley. These roads were
mentioned in 1337, (fn. 15)
c. 1460, (fn. 16) and 1511 (fn. 17) respectively. The route from Birmingham to Edgbaston
was by Edgbaston Street, Holloway Head and
Wheeleys Road; forms of these names occur
respectively in 1449, (fn. 18) 1553, (fn. 19) and 1511, (fn. 20) and the
name Wheeleys Road suggests that the route led on
to Weoley Castle. (fn. 21) Roads to Harborne and Halesowen led from Five Ways, so named in 1565. (fn. 22)
On the Staffordshire side of Birmingham, where
there were large stretches of uncultivated heath and
no rivers difficult to cross, there were probably many
tracks leading to the neighbouring towns and
villages. The soil of the area is such that it allowed
the development of routes which did not need to
be well defined or carefully established. (fn. 23) It was
only with the growth of the heavy coal traffic that
the condition of the roads in the area began to
present any problem, and the routes were possibly
not all precisely fixed until inclosure (fn. 24) and building (fn. 25)
limited their courses. Summer Lane, leading in the
direction of Perry and Walsall, was named in 1260. (fn. 26)
A lane leading towards Dudley was mentioned in
1565. (fn. 27) About 1460 a route through Witton towards
Oscott crossed the Tame at 'le Foulford', (fn. 28) where
Witton Bridge was later built. To the north-east,
the route towards Erdington and Sutton Coldfield
crossed the Tame by Salford Bridge, in existence by
1290. (fn. 29) The route from Birmingham to Ward End
and Castle Bromwich probably went through
Saltley: this road was probably that mentioned in
deeds of 1250 and 1340. (fn. 30) Another route through
Saltley led from the northern end of Birmingham
to Stechford, entering the hamlet from the north
over Stechford Bridge.
In Birmingham's medieval history these local
routes are probably more important than roads from
farther afield. Letters patent were dated at Birmingham in 1235 when the king was travelling from
Lichfield to Worcester, (fn. 31) and again in 1486 when
the king was travelling from Nottingham to
Worcester. (fn. 32) On each occasion the route was
presumably through Bromsgrove, and Droitwich
along the road from Birmingham to Worcester
already referred to as a probable ancient saltway;
between Bromsgrove and Droitwich it appears to
have been a carriageable road in the 10th century, (fn. 33)
and the erection of a mill at Bromsgrove in 1273
was said to have interfered with the king's highway
there. (fn. 34) The route from Lichfield to Birmingham
may have been either through Sutton Coldfield,
where a highway was mentioned in 1176, (fn. 35) or
through Perry, for a man travelling to Lichfield
from south of Birmingham c. 1379 alleged that a
bridge across the Tame in Handsworth parish lay
on his direct route. (fn. 36)
Of the roads which converge on Birmingham
from the south-east to cross the Rea by Deritend
Bridge, two were mentioned as passing through
Yardley in 1282. These were probably the roads to
Coventry and Stratford-on-Avon. (fn. 37) The road to
Coventry was carried over the Blythe by Stone
Bridge, which was in existence in 1299, (fn. 38) and from
Stone Bridge a road running south to Kenilworth
and Southam crossed the Avon by Chesford Bridge,
mentioned in 1279. (fn. 39) The road to Stratford is
thought to have existed in the Anglo-Saxon period, (fn. 40)
and from it the road to Warwick branched off
through Lapworth and Lowsonford. (fn. 41) There may
have been an alternative route to Warwick through
Solihull and Knowle, (fn. 42) but the most commonly
used route in the 17th century and earlier seems to
have been through Rowington. (fn. 43)
From the mid-15th century there is evidence of a
road from Birmingham to Coleshill, (fn. 44) and it was
possible to continue on towards Atherstone, crossing
the Blythe by Blythe Bridge, mentioned in 1382, (fn. 45)
and the Bourne by a 14th-century bridge between
Shustoke and Over Whitacre. (fn. 46) On the other side
of Birmingham routes may be assumed to have led
towards Kidderminster and Stourbridge, towards
Bridgnorth through Dudley, (fn. 47) and towards Wolverhampton through Walsall, passing over Hamstead
Bridge. (fn. 48)
The condition and congestion of these roads
became a serious problem as traffic increased, and
this problem was to some extent met in successive
periods by turnpiking, by the building of canals,
and by the coming of the railways. It has been said
of Birmingham that no town in England derived
more benefit from turnpike roads and canals. (fn. 49)
The roads leading north-west out of Birmingham,
which had the natural advantage of comparatively
favourable terrain, (fn. 50) began to bear heavy traffic with
the increase in the carriage of coals and iron, and as
their use increased their condition deteriorated. A
deed of 1612 mentions the 'great way' from Perry
Bridge to Birmingham. (fn. 51) In 1642 Charles I used
the road through Wolverhampton and Birmingham
on his way from Shrewsbury to Edge Hill, instead
of travelling on the route through Worcester. (fn. 52) In
1727 the road from Birmingham to Dudley was said
to be greatly used for the carriage of iron goods,
coal, and lime, (fn. 53) and the road to Wolverhampton to
be impassable as a result of the damage done by the
carriage of iron and coal. (fn. 54) In 1781 Hutton described
the Walsall road, which went by Handsworth
church, as 'rather below indifferent', and the Dudley
road as 'despicable beyond description'; the
Wolverhampton road, he said, had greatly improved
because the coal traffic had moved to the canal, (fn. 55)
and he recorded in 1806 that the Walsall road had
been lately made good. (fn. 56) The road to Wolverhampton through West Bromwich and Wednesbury
(the Birmingham and Wednesbury Turnpike) was
turnpiked in 1727, (fn. 57) and that through Smethwick to
Wolverhampton (the Dudley, Birmingham, and
Wolverhampton Turnpike) in 1760. (fn. 58) The Walsall
and Hamstead Turnpike was set up in 1788, (fn. 59) and
the Handsworth Turnpike, responsible for the road
from Hamstead to Soho Hill, in 1809. (fn. 60) The New
Walsall Road, joining New Town Row to the
Walsall and Hamstead road at Great Barr was turnpiked as the Perry Barr Turnpike in 1831. (fn. 61) In 1840
all these turnpikes were in an apparently good
financial position, and their roads were all said to be
in reasonable repair, (fn. 62) but by 1847 the Handsworth
Turnpike owed £2,652 in arrears of interest and
£2,167 in bonded debt, whereas toll receipts (in
1846) were only £227. (fn. 63) These five turnpikes had
all expired by 1879. (fn. 64)
Of the roads running west and south-west from
Birmingham, that to Halesowen and Kidderminster
was turnpiked in 1753. (fn. 65) In 1781 its condition was
said to be 'chequered with good and evil, chiefly the
latter', (fn. 66) and in 1840 it was reported as not in very
good repair though no part was under indictment.
The turnpike trust, known as the Birmingham and
Blakedownpool Trust, (fn. 67) expired in 1877. (fn. 68) The
road leading towards Bristol through Bromsgrove
and Worcester was said in 1706, on the occasion of
a petition to Parliament for the establishment of a
turnpike trust, to be almost impassable as a result
of the heavy traffic of salt, iron, and coal. (fn. 69) It was
turnpiked between Droitwich and Worcester in
1713, (fn. 70) between Birmingham and Bromsgrove in
1726, (fn. 71) and between Bromsgrove and Droitwich in
1748. (fn. 72) It was said in 1781 that the first four miles
of this road out of Birmingham were very good,
£5,000 having been spent on that part of it in 1772,
and that thereafter it was dirty and narrow, (fn. 73) but
by 1806 the whole length of the road had been made
good. (fn. 74) By 1790 this route was being used by mailcoaches, (fn. 75) and in 1840 the condition of the road was
said to be good although between Birmingham and
Bromsgrove the foundations were weak. (fn. 76) The road
was disturnpiked as far as Bromsgrove in 1872, (fn. 77)
and as far as Worcester in 1877. (fn. 78) The width and
straightness of the present Bristol road leading out
of Birmingham was achieved in the late 19th century. (fn. 79) The Pershore road, said in 1890 to have been
a footpath within living memory, (fn. 80) was turnpiked
in 1825. By 1839 the trust was suffering severe
financial difficulties, but these were under control
by 1850. (fn. 81) The road was disturnpiked in 1879. (fn. 82)
Of the roads leading out of Birmingham to the
south and south-east, that through Moseley to
Alcester and Evesham seems to have been of no
great importance, (fn. 83) although in the 18th century as
many as 80 pack-horses in a day used it to carry
garden produce from Evesham to Birmingham. (fn. 84) It
was probably not a carriageable road at the time: in
1637 the inhabitants of Alcester were presented at
Quarter Sessions for not repairing a footway to
Birmingham, (fn. 85) and although in 1725 Stukeley
described the part known as the Moseley road as
very broad, (fn. 86) the Alcester road in 1781 was said to
be rather too narrow. (fn. 87) The course of the road
appears to have been changed since the 18th
century. (fn. 88) In 1836 a Birmingham man aged 90 said
that in his youth he would rather go any other way
out of town in rough weather. (fn. 89) The road is not
marked on a mid-18th-century map compiled for
the Universal Magazine. (fn. 90) It was turnpiked from
Spernal Ash to Alcester in 1753, from Digbeth to
Spernal Ash in 1767, and from Alcester to Evesham
in 1777. (fn. 91) The condition of the road in 1840 was
said to be improving. (fn. 92) All of it was disturnpiked by
1874. (fn. 93) The Stratford, Warwick, and Coventry
roads, all of which provided possible routes to
London, (fn. 94) appear to have been much used from the
17th century. In 1646 the 'great road between
Warwick and Birmingham' passed through Rowington, (fn. 95) presumably joining the Stratford-Birmingham road at Hockley Heath, and in 1828 the
Birmingham-Warwick mails still used this route. (fn. 96)
The Birmingham-Warwick road was under indictment many times in the early 17th century, (fn. 97) the
Birmingham-Stratford road more seldom. (fn. 98) When
these two roads were turnpiked in 1726, the route
of the former was through Solihull and Knowle; (fn. 99)
this route had been used in the early 17th century, (fn. 1)
but perhaps less frequently than that through
Hockley Heath. The road between Coventry and
Meriden, which was part of the London-Holyhead
route, was turnpiked in 1724, and the trust's powers
were extended to cover the section between Meriden
and Stone Bridge in 1753. (fn. 2) A separate turnpike
trust for the road between Birmingham and Stone
Bridge was set up in 1745. (fn. 3) The heavy traffic along
these three routes out of Birmingham made it
difficult to keep the roads in good repair and in 1745
all three were said to be 'ruinous'. (fn. 4) In 1768 the
Coventry road was described as exceedingly bad,
and even dangerous to those unacquainted with it. (fn. 5)
In 1781 Hutton wrote that the Stratford and
Warwick roads were 'much used and much neglected', and that the Coventry road could 'only be
equalled by the Dudley road', which he had already
roundly condemned. (fn. 6) The condition of the Stratford
road in 1841 was said to be improving, that of the
Warwick road fair, and that of the Coventry road
good although the foundations were weak in places.
At that date the financial position of all three roads
was satisfactory, but adverse competition from the
railways was expected. (fn. 7) All three were disturnpiked
in 1872. (fn. 8)

Roads leading to Birmingham c. 1950
For the area within the centre square see street plan on p. 11.
The road from Birmingham through Castle
Bromwich to Coleshill was under indictment at
Quarter Sessions in 1651 and 1662. (fn. 9) The watery
character of the country on this side of Birmingham
evidently made travelling difficult. Hutton wrote in
1781 that at Saltley 'every flood annoys the traveller', and that the river crossing at Coleshill Hall
was dangerous until 1779. (fn. 10) The road to Castle
Bromwich was turnpiked in 1759 as part of the
Boughton, Chester, and Stonebridge Turnpike
Trust; (fn. 11) in 1823 this road, together with the section
of the Chester road from Stonall (Staffs.) to Stone
Bridge, was placed under a separate trust, which
expired in 1877. (fn. 12) In 1840 the roads of this trust
were said to be in a good state of repair, having been
recently improved. (fn. 13) The road between Castle
Bromwich and Coleshill was apparently never turnpiked, but from Coleshill there were turnpiked
roads to Atherstone, Nuneaton, and Hinckley
(Leics.). (fn. 14) A road from Birmingham through Kingsbury to Atherstone was mentioned in 1648. (fn. 15) On
the road to Lichfield the Hockley Brook, one mile
out of Birmingham, had no bridge until 1792, (fn. 16) and
the road was not turnpiked until 1807. The trust
then established was responsible for the road as far
as Watford Gap, on the boundary of Warwickshire
and Staffordshire, where it joined the Lichfield
Turnpike. There was also a branch from Sutton
Coldfield to Bassett's Pole where it joined the
Tamworth Turnpike, and in 1826 a branch from
Gravelly Hill to Kingsbury was placed under the
same trust. (fn. 17) All the trust's roads were in a poor
condition in 1840, though no part of them was under
indictment, and the road to Lichfield was said to
have been adversely affected both by the competition of the railways and by the abolition of statute
labour. It was said that on the Kingsbury branch,
before abolition, statute labour could hardly ever be
obtained. (fn. 18) The Kingsbury branch was disturnpiked
in 1871, and the Watford Gap road, together with
the Bassett's Pole branch, in 1872. (fn. 19)
The 17th-century route from London to Chester
and the north-west passed several miles to the east
of Birmingham. (fn. 20) The expansion of Birmingham's
commerce was accompanied by the development of
an alternative and, later, more important trunk
route through Birmingham from London to
Liverpool and North Wales. During the 16th
century a route branching off the Chester road at
Meriden and going through Birmingham to Wolverhampton and Shrewsbury became established, (fn. 21) and
in the late 17th century the main roads from
London to Shrewsbury and Ludlow diverged at
Birmingham. (fn. 22) For the next hundred years,
however, the normal route from London to Birmingham was the slightly circuitous one by Oxford
and Stratford-on-Avon. It was by this route that
the London-Shrewsbury mail travelled from 1784 (fn. 23)
and that William Hutton went to London and back
in the same year, (fn. 24) although a coach from London
to Coventry, Birmingham, and Lichfield was
travelling in 1739, (fn. 25) and a stage-coach going by
Coventry, Castle Bromwich, Birmingham, Walsall,
and Wolverhampton was in operation in 1780. (fn. 26)
From 1808 the Holyhead mail travelled by the
Oxford-Birmingham-Shrewsbury route, and from
1812 Birmingham had its own direct mail to
London. From 1817 the part of the Holyhead route
between London and Birmingham was the more
direct one through Coventry, (fn. 27) and by 1819 this
was also part of the main London-Liverpool
route. (fn. 28)
The condition of the road between London and
Birmingham in the 18th century and the early 19th
century seems usually to have been bad. Carriers
operating between Birmingham and London increased their charges in 1763 on the grounds that
the deterioration of the road had increased their
costs, (fn. 29) and in 1765 the cost of road transport on the
London-Birmingham route was about 10s. a ton for
ten miles. (fn. 30) The Royal Mail between London and
Birmingham took 15½ hours in 1811, compared with
about 11 hours in 1837. (fn. 31) In 1819 the London-
Birmingham road was said to give great occasion for
complaint: between London and Birmingham
twelve horses were required to perform the same
number of miles as eight would do between Birmingham and Holyhead. (fn. 32) During the next ten
years considerable improvements were made:
greater speeds were attained, and the making of a
new stretch of road just outside Birmingham,
considered essential in 1820, was abandoned as
unnecessary five years later. (fn. 33)
In 1659 a coach was advertised as reaching
Birmingham from London in about four days. (fn. 34) In
1679 Sir William Dugdale travelled as far as
Banbury in a Birmingham coach. (fn. 35) It was announced in 1702 that the 'Wolverhampton and
Birmingham Flying Stage Coach' would make the
journey once a week in three days, but this venture
seems to have been short-lived. In 1731 a weekly
coach and a weekly wagon began to run between
London and Birmingham, the time for the coach
being 2½ days; (fn. 36) in 1747 a coach taking two days
was advertised, (fn. 37) and in 1758 an 'improved Birmingham coach' with 'friction annihilated' was
announced. (fn. 38) By 1777 there were 52 coaches, each
carrying between three and six people, leaving
Birmingham for London each week, compared with
sixteen to Bristol, four to Sheffield, and four to
Coventry. (fn. 39) When Hutton went to London in 1784
the journey took 19 hours; he described it as a 'trite
journey', travelled by Birmingham tradesmen every
day in the year, and Hutton found when he wished
to return that even in snowy December weather all
the places were booked two days in advance. (fn. 40)
During the 1820s the time for the journey was
greatly reduced: the shortest scheduled time was
just over eleven hours, in 1836, and the record time
was seven and a half hours. (fn. 41) By this date, however,
the threat of the railways was already overshadowing
the achievements on the roads, and the last new coach
was put on the London-Birmingham route in 1837. (fn. 42)
The revival and rapid growth of road transport in
the 20th century had, up to 1939, given rise to only
one major development in the roads in the neighbourhood of Birmingham. This was the building of
the new Birmingham-Wolverhampton road, opened
by the Prince of Wales in 1927. (fn. 43) Some of the road
developments designed primarily to facilitate the
internal communications of Birmingham have had a
considerable effect on the communications between
Birmingham and its neighbours. An early example
of this was the laying out of Great Lister Street in
1829, which opened a direct road from the centre of
Birmingham to Castle Bromwich. (fn. 44)
During the later Middle Ages the maintenance of
roads and bridges in and around Birmingham was
to some extent the responsibility of the Guild of the
Holy Cross (founded 1392). (fn. 45) By the 16th century
the guild may have been neglecting this responsibility, for under the terms of deeds of 1526 and
1540 property left by William Lench was to be
applied to the repair of roads and bridges in and
near Birmingham. This charity, known as Lench's
Trust, was augmented by several other benefactions. (fn. 46) From 1824 to 1828, out of an average annual
rental of £656 10s., £227 was expended on the
repair of streets. (fn. 47) The original terms of the trust
seem to have been intended to cover the maintenance of roads leading between Birmingham and
other towns, but it appears that by the late 18th
century only those roads within the built-up area of
the town benefited from the charity. (fn. 48)
Bridges
From an early date the crossing of the Rea at
Deritend was an important link in the communications of the Birmingham area. (fn. 49) Leland mentioned
Deritend Bridge: in 1536 he went through the ford
beside the bridge. (fn. 50) It has been argued from this
that the bridge at the time was only a footbridge, (fn. 51)
but this was not necessarily so, for a hundred years
later the bridge was kept closed whenever the ford
provided a practicable way across. (fn. 52) There were in
fact two bridges, for just above Deritend the Rea
divided into two streams which joined again below
the bridge. (fn. 53) There were still these two separate
bridges in 1675, when it was uncertain who should
repair the stretch of road between them. (fn. 54) In 1547
the Guild of the Holy Cross was said to maintain
two great stone bridges, (fn. 55) presumably the bridges
at Deritend. (fn. 56) Seven years earlier the charity
already referred to, known as Lench's Trust, had
been assigned the task of maintaining bridges in and
around Birmingham. (fn. 57) The responsibility of Lench's
Trust may not have extended to the two bridges
maintained by the guild; and although the overlapping of the proposed objects of Lench's Trust
with the avowed activities of the guild suggests that
Lench's trustees were dissatisfied with the efforts
of the guild, (fn. 58) the connexion between Lench's Trust
and Deritend Bridge was tenuous. In 1625 the
bridge was in a bad condition, and the inhabitants
of Birmingham were unwilling to repair it; the
justices disclaimed responsibility, and the inhabitants brought an action to have the bridge declared
a county bridge. (fn. 59) Meanwhile, in 1626, it was
decreed that the bridge should be repaired out of
the revenue of Lench's Trust. (fn. 60) In 1642 judgment
was given against the inhabitants of Birmingham,
but ten years later, when the bridge had apparently
fallen down from neglect, it was decided that it
should be repaired by the county. (fn. 61) In 1654 it was
ordered in Quarter Sessions that Lench's trustees
should keep the bridge chained up except when the
ford was impassable so that the recent repairs to the
bridge should last longer. (fn. 62) A similar order was made
in 1687, when the surveyors of the highways were
made responsible for chaining up the bridge and
keeping the ford in good condition. (fn. 63) Several times
in the later part of the century the bridge was said
to be in bad condition, and responsibility for its
repair was accepted by the county. (fn. 64) A view of
1732 shows the bridge, presumably that built
between 1652 and 1654, with four segmental arches
and cutwater piers on each side forming recesses in
the parapets; a few yards downstream there was a
wooden footbridge. The view does not depict any
bridge over the northern arm of the Rea, (fn. 65) which
appears from a contemporary map to have been
dammed up or at least greatly diminished. (fn. 66) The
bridge was replaced in 1750 by one of five arches,
which was said to be too narrow and too steep in the
ascent. (fn. 67) This bridge was in turn replaced in 1789
by one 'more useful but less handsome', (fn. 68) built
under an Act of 1788 (fn. 69) which empowered trustees
to widen the approaches by removing buildings, to
take tolls for four years, and thereafter to levy a
rate. The tolls did not produce as much as had been
expected, and the trustees encountered difficulties
in levying the rate. (fn. 70) A new Act was obtained in
1813 (fn. 71) and yet another in 1822. (fn. 72) Under the more
favourable terms of the last Act the trustees were
able to fulfil their obligations, the bridge was rebuilt
with greater width and more open approaches, (fn. 73) and
in 1828, 'the whole of the objects having been
accomplished', the toll-gates were removed. (fn. 74) In
the late 19th and early 20th centuries the carrying
out of drainage and highway schemes (fn. 75) has so
altered Deritend Bridge that the river, which runs
along a neat, bricked channel, cannot be seen from
the main road, in which a slight rise and fall is all
that indicates the crossing.
Of the other older bridges crossing the Rea,
Duddeston Bridge was mentioned in the mid-15th
century. (fn. 76) It was apparently not a county bridge in
the 17th century. (fn. 77) It is shown on two maps of 1738
and 1760. Saltley Bridge is also marked on the same
maps. (fn. 78) Over the River Cole, the New Bridge on the
Yardley Green road was named in the 15th century, (fn. 79) and both this bridge and Stechford Bridge
are shown on a map of 1759. (fn. 80) A bridge was built to
carry the Stratford road over the Cole in 1715; a
new bridge was opened in 1913. (fn. 81)
The River Tame is crossed at Hamstead by
Hamstead Bridge. A bridge there was mentioned in
1688, but it was further upstream and nearer Hamstead colliery than the present bridge. A new bridge
was built on the present site in 1809 or soon after. (fn. 82)
Perry Bridge, about two miles downstream, was
mentioned in a deed of 1612. (fn. 83) The present
structure is probably that which was ordered to be
built at Quarter Sessions in 1709 to replace a
wooden horse-bridge. (fn. 84) Where Witton Bridge now
is there was a ford called 'le Foulford' c. 1460, (fn. 85) and
near Witton a part of the river was known as
'Wolfatbrugge' in 1358. (fn. 86) A map of 1758 shows
Witton Bridge as a footbridge or horse-bridge with
a ford a little to the south of it. (fn. 87) Salford Bridge,
mentioned in 1290, (fn. 88) was described in 1536 as being
of four arches of stone. (fn. 89) It was repairable by Aston
parish in the early 17th century, but during the
Civil War it was destroyed by the parliamentary
troops and was thereafter chargeable to the
county. (fn. 90) In 1687 the surveyors of the parish highways were ordered to keep the ford by the bridge
in good condition and to chain up the bridge when
the ford was passable. (fn. 91) A map of 1738 shows
Salford Bridge crossing the river at an island. (fn. 92)
Bromford Bridge, mentioned in 1317-18 and c.
1460, (fn. 93) is shown on a map of 1759. (fn. 94) It was repaired
in 1821 when £12 was paid out of Knight's charity,
which had been founded in 1736 largely for the
purpose of maintaining roads and bridges in and
near Castle Bromwich; (fn. 95) in the early 19th century,
however, only two payments were made for this
purpose apart from 5s. paid annually to the surveyors of highways. (fn. 96) Castle Bromwich Bridge, the
last before the Tame leaves Birmingham, is shown
on a map of 1798. (fn. 97) It was rebuilt by Birmingham
Corporation in 1934. (fn. 98) In 1669 the inhabitants of
Erdington were presented for not repairing three
horse-bridges called 'Erdington bridges' leading
between Erdington and Castle Bromwich; (fn. 99) it is
possible that these included Bromford Bridge or
Castle Bromwich Bridge.
By a deed of 1612 Nicholas Hodgetts of Handsworth granted property for the maintenance of
bridges in Handsworth; this endowment is known
as the Handsworth Bridge Trust. In 1823 the trust
maintained five carriage bridges and three footbridges; one of the carriage bridges, that over the
Hockley Brook at the bottom of Soho Hill, was
repaired jointly with Birmingham, and another was
repaired jointly with Great Barr. Two bridges had
been transferred from the parish to the county at
the beginning of the 19th century, and, as the value
of the trust's property increased, the excess of
income over the expenditure required on the
bridges was spent on educational purposes. (fn. 1) A
Scheme of 1859 reduced the trust's responsibility
for bridges in the parish, and in recent times only a
small proportion of the trust's income has been
spent on bridges. (fn. 2)
Canals
The importance in Birmingham's development of
its canal system is matched by the enormous
physical difficulties which were overcome in constructing it. The steep edges of the Birmingham
plateau made necessary long flights of locks, and
the uplands of the region, especially the SedgleyRowley ridge and the sharp slopes of the upper
Stour valley, were considerable obstacles. Almost
entirely as a result of the problems set by the terrain
the Worcester and Birmingham Canal took 24 years
to build, and in the course of that time the shares
fell from £140 to nothing. (fn. 3) The Stourbridge Canal
required 20 locks to rise from Stourton to Pensnett
Chase, and then wound round Brierley Hill to Black
Delph and climbed through a further nine locks to
the level of the Dudley Canal. (fn. 4) Moreover, natural
water supplies were insufficient to keep the canals
full enough to be navigable, and special arrangements had to be made. (fn. 5) The Birmingham Canal
was entirely supplied by artificial means; (fn. 6) and in
the early 20th century the chief criticism of the
Birmingham Canal was that the water was not kept
at a sufficiently high level to allow the narrow boats
to take their full loads. (fn. 7) The canals of the district
came to depend for most of their water on supplies
pumped from colliery workings. (fn. 8) 'Nothing more
fully shows the enterprising genius of the inhabitants of Birmingham', it was said in 1803, 'than the
number of canals cut from that town in every
direction.' (fn. 9) The Birmingham canal network performed a double function: it provided a cheap means
of transport for coal, limestone, and iron within the
district - a function which it still performs to some
extent - and it formed a connexion between the
manufacturing district and the chief national
water-routes. (fn. 10)
Until the building of the canals Birmingham's
inland position and its distance from any navigable
river placed it at a disadvantage compared with most
other comparable towns. The nearest large rivers
were the Trent, usually navigable only as far as
Nottingham, (fn. 11) and the Severn. In 1695 and 1720
Birmingham inhabitants joined in unsuccessful
attempts to have the Derwent made navigable
between Derby and its confluence with the Trent.
Following an Act passed in 1698 the Trent (fn. 12) was
made navigable as far as Burton, but merchants,
traders, and other inhabitants of Birmingham
complained in 1714 that shipping on it was being
monopolized. (fn. 13) The first canal of the district was
the Birmingham Canal, for which an Act was
obtained in 1768. (fn. 14) This canal has remained the
most important to Birmingham's commerce and
industry, and from the company of its proprietors
originated the Company of the Proprietors of the
Birmingham Canal Navigations, which from the
mid-19th century controlled the network of waterways radiating outwards to the east, north, and west
of the town and forming the nucleus of the midland
canal system. (fn. 15) The prosperity and usefulness of the
Birmingham Canal stimulated other companies to
obtain Acts for further canals - the Dudley Canal
(1776), (fn. 16) the Birmingham and Fazeley Canal
(1783), (fn. 17) the Worcester and Birmingham Canal
(1791), (fn. 18) the Warwick and Birmingham Canal
(1793), (fn. 19) the Stratford-on-Avon Canal (1793), (fn. 20) and
the Birmingham and Warwick Junction Canal
(1840). (fn. 21) In addition to these, all of which pass
through the area of the modern city of Birmingham,
a number of other canals can be regarded as
forming part of the Birmingham canal network but
are not described in any detail at this point. These
are the Staffordshire and Worcestershire Canal (Act
obtained 1766), (fn. 22) the Coventry Canal (1768), (fn. 23) the
Stourbridge Canal (1776), (fn. 24) the Wyrley and
Essington Canal (1792), (fn. 25) and the Birmingham and
Liverpool Junction Canal (1826). (fn. 26)
In 1767, a year after the authorization of the
Staffordshire and Worcestershire Canal, which was
to link the Severn with the Trent and Mersey Canal,
a subscription was opened for a canal from Birmingham through Wolverhampton to Aldersley
(Staffs.) on the Staffordshire and Worcestershire,
and an Act was obtained the following year. (fn. 27) The
undertaking possessed two attractions: the canal
would enable coal to be brought more cheaply to
Birmingham from the south Staffordshire coalfields,
and it would link Birmingham with Bristol, Liverpool, and Hull. The canal was surveyed by James
Brindley, and in 1770 the first cargo was carried. (fn. 28)
Coal from Wednesbury was sold in Birmingham at
7s. a ton, little more than half the price before the
canal was built. (fn. 29) In 1772 the junction at Aldersley
was made with the Staffordshire and Worcestershire, (fn. 30) which was itself completed in the same
year. (fn. 31) By 1772 the Birmingham Canal had cost
£100,000, and between then and 1795 improvements
cost a further £50,000. (fn. 32) As originally built, the
canal followed a meandering course, 22 miles from
the Birmingham wharf at Broad Street to Aldersley,
and crossed the summit at Smethwick by a series
of locks. (fn. 33) In 1824 Thomas Telford undertook to
improve the canal, which was by then inadequate
for its requirements. He found the canal 'little
better than a crooked ditch', with almost no towing
path and serious traffic jams. Telford reduced the
length of the main canal to 14 miles by cutting off
numerous bends, including two within modern
Birmingham, which remained to serve as branches;
he also widened the canal through its whole length,
drove a 70-ft. cutting through the Smethwick
summit, and built the Rotton Park reservoir for the
canal's water-supply. Telford was said at Birmingham to deserve a public reward for introducing
good manners among the boatmen - a measure of
the value of his improvements. (fn. 34) There was a further
major improvement when the tunnel through
Coseley Hill was built in 1837. (fn. 35)
Meanwhile, canal-building was improving Birmingham's communications in other directions. In
1783 an Act was obtained for building the Birmingham and Fazeley Canal to join the Birmingham
Canal with the Coventry Canal. (fn. 36) The Birmingham
and Fazeley Canal, which included a branch to
Digbeth, was completed in 1790, when the aqueduct
across the Tame at Salford Bridge was finished. (fn. 37)
This provided a much shorter route to Hull than
that through Aldersley, and ultimately afforded a
connexion with London via the Coventry, Oxford,
and Grand Junction Canals. Goods from Liverpool
and Manchester were brought to Birmingham
chiefly by way of Fazeley, and grain was brought to
Birmingham from Oxfordshire. (fn. 38) Until the building
of the Grand Junction Canal goods from Birmingham bound for London were taken as far as Oxford
by canal and thence by road. (fn. 39)
A new route between Birmingham and the
Severn was opened when the Dudley Canal Company
built a new cut, authorized in 1785, from Black
Delph, north-east of Stourbridge, through the
Dudley tunnel to Tipton Green (Staffs.) on the
Birmingham Canal. (fn. 40) The Dudley Canal connected
with the Stourbridge Canal (both were authorized
in 1776) which in turn made a junction with the
Staffordshire and Worcestershire at Stourton. Before
this cut had been completed, (fn. 41) the Worcester and
Birmingham Canal was authorized by an Act of
1791; (fn. 42) it was to link Birmingham even more closely
to the Severn and by-pass the stretch of river,
where traffic was held up in dry weather, between
Stourport and Worcester. (fn. 43) The opposition to this
new canal, first by the Dudley Canal Company and
then by the Staffordshire and Worcestershire, was
so considerable that a compromise was reached in
the Act to the effect that there was to be no junction
at Birmingham between the Worcester and Birmingham Canal and the Birmingham Canal. (fn. 44) In
1793, however, the Dudley Canal Company began a
new cut, involving the tunnel of over 2 miles
through the ridge at Lapal, to link its own canal
with the Worcester and Birmingham at Selly Oak.
This was completed in 1801. (fn. 45) The full results of
these developments were not seen for a number of
years; the Worcester and Birmingham Canal was
completed, after many difficulties, only in 1815. (fn. 46)
In the same year the enactment prohibiting a
junction between the Birmingham Canal and the
Worcester and Birmingham Canal was reversed. (fn. 47)
Acts for the Warwick and Birmingham Canal and
the Stratford-on-Avon Canal were obtained in 1793.
The Warwick and Birmingham Canal joined the
Birmingham and Fazeley Canal at Digbeth and was
completed in 1799, providing a more direct route
for waterborne traffic from Birmingham to London,
especially after the opening of the Grand Junction
Canal in 1805. The Stratford-on-Avon Canal was
completed as far as Hockley Heath in 1796, joining
the Worcester and Birmingham at King's Norton. (fn. 48)
With the completion of the Worcester and Birmingham the skeleton of the Birmingham canal
system was largely finished. Of later developments
the most important was the opening of the Birmingham and Liverpool Junction Canal, authorized in
1826, (fn. 49) which shortened the distance by water to
the Mersey. Other developments included the
opening of the Birmingham and Warwick Junction
Canal (from the Warwick and Birmingham at
Bordesley to the Birmingham and Fazeley at
Salford Bridge) in 1844, (fn. 50) of the Tame Valley
branch of the Birmingham Canal under Acts of
1839 and 1840, (fn. 51) and of the Netherton tunnel in
1855 to provide a much shorter route from Birmingham to the Stour valley. (fn. 52) By the mid-19th
century the Birmingham Canal Navigations had
become the hub of the national canal system. (fn. 53)
By 1846 the control of the canals around the
north, west, and east of Birmingham had become
amalgamated under a single company. The Company of the Proprietors of the Birmingham Canal
Navigations (the full title of the owners of the
original Birmingham Canal) was reorganized in 1784
under the same name when the Birmingham and
Fazeley Canal Company was merged with it. In 1840
this company took over the Wyrley and Essington
Canal Navigations, a network of canals in south
Staffordshire, stretching between Wolverhampton
and Lichfield, which originated in 1792 and was
used principally for the carriage of coals. Finally, in
1846, the Dudley Canal Company was merged with
the Birmingham Canal Navigations. (fn. 54)
From an early date the Birmingham Canal
Navigations were so well used that they became
overcrowded. (fn. 55) The prosperity of the company in
the first fifty years of its existence is represented by
the rise in the value of its shares. The original shares
were computed to have cost £140 each; by 1782
they were worth £370 and by 1792 £1,110. (fn. 56) They
suffered a temporary fall in value as a result of the
opening of the Dudley Canal's extension to Selly
Oak, (fn. 57) but in 1813 half shares were selling for up to
£585. By 1824 the shares had been divided into
eighths and were selling for £360 each. (fn. 58) Thereafter
the threatened competition of the railways seems to
have caused a steady decline in value. The eighthshares were down to £284 by 1830, to £200 in 1840,
and to £158 in 1844. (fn. 59)
In 1846, shortly before the amalgamation of the
Dudley Canal Company with the Birmingham
Canal Navigations, an agreement was reached
between the London and Birmingham Railway
Company and the Birmingham Canal Navigations.
The canal company was to contribute a quarter of
the cost of constructing the Birmingham, Wolverhampton and Stour Valley Railway, (fn. 60) which would
run alongside the canal, while the railway company
was to guarantee the canal company's dividend.
Representation on the canal company's board was
to be divided equally between the canal company
and the railway company, the representatives of the
canal company having the casting vote as long as
the guarantee was not needed, and the representatives of the railway company having it in the years
for which the guarantee was needed. With the
exception of the year 1868 the guarantee was not
needed until 1874, when the canal came under
continuous railway control. Between 1876 and 1905
the annual average of the deficiencies in the canal's
affairs made up by the railway company was
£22,500. (fn. 61)
The Warwick and Birmingham Canal and the
Birmingham and Warwick Junction Canal remained
independent until they became part of the Grand
Union in 1929. (fn. 62) The Stratford-on-Avon Canal was
acquired by the Oxford, Worcester and Wolverhampton (later the Great Western) Railway
Company in 1846, and entered a gradual decline;
by 1939 it was no longer navigable for commercial
purposes. (fn. 63) The Worcester and Birmingham Canal,
which had an unusually expensive line to maintain,
suffered heavily from railway competition and
passed into the hands of a receiver in 1863. It was
acquired by the Gloucester and Berkeley Canal
Company (later the Sharpness Docks and Gloucester and Birmingham Navigation Company) in 1874,
in whose hands it continued to be an expensive
liability. (fn. 64)
The tonnage carried on the Birmingham Canal
Navigations rose steadily from 4½ million in 1848 to
8½ million in 1898, and thereafter fell to 7½ million
in 1905. These totals were far higher than those for
any other canal company in the same period, (fn. 65) but
more than four-fifths of the tonnage appears to have
been loaded and discharged on the canal company's
own waterways. (fn. 66) Through traffic was discouraged
by the company's refusal to make adequate concessions in tolls on cargoes which originated from
and were destined for canals outside the company's
network. (fn. 67) The Warwick and Birmingham Canal,
which took most of the waterborne traffic between
Birmingham and London, carried 226,000 tons in
1848 and 354,000 tons in 1898. (fn. 68) Between 1895 and
1905 through tonnage between Birmingham on the
one hand and Brentford and Paddington on the
other fell from 102,000 to 92,000. (fn. 69)
In the early 20th century the Birmingham canals
comprised 3.1 per cent. of the total mileage of
navigable waterways in actual operation in the
United Kingdom, and carried 19.1 per cent. of the
total tonnage. The average distance travelled by
each ton, however, was very short; on the Warwick
and Birmingham Canal it was 10½ miles. Most of
the tonnage consisted of raw materials and goods
exchanged between collecting basins belonging to
the railways and works situated on the canals, or of
coal from the collieries of the district brought to the
works and depots within the district. About 15 per
cent. of the tonnage was being carried to and from
railway basins. (fn. 70) On the Birmingham Canal
Navigations there were about 550 private basins and
branches, and along the banks iron-works and other
factories formed 'an almost continuous line for many
miles between Birmingham, Wolverhampton, and
other places'. (fn. 71) Great expenditure was involved in
maintaining the canals. On the Birmingham Canal
Navigations 31½ million gallons of water a day were
pumped from a low level to a higher level, and
throughout the district subsidence caused trouble. (fn. 72)
Neither the Dudley tunnel nor the Lapal tunnel had
a towpath; (fn. 73) the process of 'legging' through the
latter took about 4 hours, and it had ceased to be
used for traffic by 1926. (fn. 74) Boats were held up by not
being able to pass at locks and bridges, and there
were allegations that the canal companies had
neglected to dredge, so that the boats were not able
to take their full loads. (fn. 75)

CANALS
In the 20th century the Birmingham canals
declined in importance less than most others. The
reports of the Royal Commission on Canals and
Inland Waterways (the Shuttleworth Commission,
1906-11) stimulated controversy about the economy
and usefulness of canals, and schemes for reviving
canal traffic and reorganizing the canals, usually on
the lines recommended by the Royal Commission,
continued to be discussed until the end of the
thirties. The only major development, however,
was the formation of the Grand Union in 1929,
which incorporated the Warwick and Birmingham
Canal and the Birmingham and Warwick Junction
Canal; about £1 million was spent on improving the
canals between London and Birmingham. (fn. 76) The
Birmingham canal network continued to be used
largely for collection and delivery between factories
and railways, (fn. 77) and despite a report of overcrowding
on the old Birmingham Canal in 1912 (fn. 78) the traffic
there was contracting. The Soho branch was
abandoned in 1909, (fn. 79) and the Old Wharf at Paradise
Street was closed in 1926. (fn. 80) The Birmingham canals
have remained, however, comparatively busy and
in good condition. (fn. 81)
The first step towards public ownership of the
canals came during the Second World War, when
the West Midland region of canals, based on the
Birmingham Canal Navigations, was under the
control of headquarters at Birmingham. (fn. 82) Under the
Transport Act of 1947 the undertakings of the
Birmingham Canal Navigations, the Grand Union,
the Sharpness Docks and Gloucester and Birmingham Navigation Company, and the Great Western
Railway, which by then owned between them all the
canals passing through Birmingham, were vested in
the British Transport Commission. (fn. 83)
Of the canal works within the boundary of
Birmingham in 1957 the Birmingham Canal, the
Selly Oak branch of the Dudley Canal, the Worcester and Birmingham Canal, and the Stratford-onAvon Canal are on the 'Birmingham level' (453 ft.).
Other works described below are on the 'Walsall
level' (408 ft.).
The Birmingham Canal enters Birmingham at
Merry Hill, and divides near King Edward's Road
to form two termini near the centre of Birmingham,
the Broad Street basin and the Newhall Street basin.
From the Broad Street basin the Worcester Bar
junction forms a connexion with the Worcester and
Birmingham. The Old Wharf at Broad Street,
which extended to Paradise Street where the
Navigation Office (fn. 84) used to stand, was closed in
1926, and a municipal car park was laid out on the
site. From the Newhall Street branch there is a
junction with the Birmingham and Fazeley Canal.
The straightening of the line of the canal in the
1820s provided two loops to serve as branches. The
larger of these, the Soho branch, was abandoned in
1909; the other connects the main line of the canal
with the Rotton Park reservoir. Excluding the loops,
the length of the canal in Birmingham is about 2
miles.
The Selly Oak branch of the Dudley Canal enters
Birmingham by the Lapal tunnel (about 2 miles in
total length), emerges at California, and joins the
Worcester and Birmingham at Selly Oak. Its length
within Birmingham is about 3 miles.
The Worcester and Birmingham Canal enters
Birmingham through the Wasthill (or Westhill)
tunnel, just over 1½ mile long in all, emerging near
King's Norton. It is joined at Lifford by the
Stratford-on-Avon Canal and at Selly Oak by the
Dudley Canal. It passes under Church Road,
Edgbaston, through a tunnel of about 100 yards,
and joins the Birmingham Canal near the Old Wharf
by Broad Street. The length of the canal within
Birmingham is about 7 miles.
The Stratford-on-Avon Canal enters Birmingham
at Yardley Wood and extends thence about 3 miles
to its junction with the Worcester and Birmingham
Canal, where there is an unusual guillotine or
portcullis stop-lock. Near Brandwood End there is
a tunnel about 300 yards long.
The Warwick and Birmingham Canal enters
Birmingham at Acock's Green, descends through
six locks at Bordesley to the junction with the
Birmingham and Warwick Junction Canal, and then
proceeds to the Birmingham bar and the junction
with the Digbeth branch, both near Fazeley Street.
The length of the canal within Birmingham is about
4½ miles.
The Birmingham and Warwick Junction Canal,
about 3 miles in length, leaves the junction with the
Warwick and Birmingham at Bordesley, and descends by five locks near Lower Dartmouth Street
and one lock by Salford Bridge, where it joins the
Birmingham and Fazeley.
The Birmingham and Fazeley Canal enters
Birmingham at Tyburn. After its junctions with the
Birmingham and Warwick Junction Canal at Salford
Bridge and with the Tame Valley branch at Salford
Junction it ascends through eleven locks at Aston
to a junction with the Digbeth branch, and then
through the thirteen Farmers' Bridge locks to its
junction with the Newhall branch of the Birmingham Canal by Kingston Row. The length of this
canal within Birmingham is about 6 miles.
The Digbeth branch, which is about 1 mile in
length, extends between its junction with the
Birmingham and Fazeley near Aston Road and the
Bordesley Street Wharves, descending by six locks
at Ashted, and making a junction with the Warwick
and Birmingham shortly before its Bordesley Street
terminus.
The Tame Valley branch enters Birmingham at
Hamstead and descends through the thirteen Perry
Barr locks (arranged in three flights) to its junction
with the Birmingham and Fazeley. Its length in
Birmingham is about 4 miles.
Railways
The possibility that railways might provide
Birmingham with better communications than
either roads or canals was given public expression
in 1824. In that year an unsuccessful attempt was
made to obtain an Act for a railway between
Birmingham and Birkenhead. (fn. 85) The plan seems to
have originated in Birmingham, and in 1825 a
meeting in Birmingham launched a similar project
for a railway to London. (fn. 86) A line north-west from
Birmingham became a more practical proposition
in 1829 when Parliament authorized a line from
Warrington to join the railway between Liverpool
and Manchester at Newton-le-Willows, (fn. 87) and in
1833 the Grand Junction Railway Company obtained an Act for a railway from Birmingham to
Warrington. (fn. 88) In the same year, following an
unsuccessful attempt in 1832, a railway from Birmingham to London was authorized. (fn. 89) Trains first
ran between Birmingham and Liverpool in 1837,
and between Birmingham and London in 1838. (fn. 90)
At Birmingham, Curzon Street station was the
terminus for both lines (fn. 91) (although Vauxhall station
was temporarily used as the terminus of the Grand
Junction Railway), (fn. 92) and thus the railways provided
a route from London to Liverpool and Manchester;
but the demand for these railways was created
mainly by the need of Birmingham manufacturers
for faster and cheaper connexions with the markets
for their goods. (fn. 93) The greater part of the early
business of these lines was passenger transport: in
1839 the Grand Junction Railway took gross
receipts of £281,125 from passengers and £66,457
from goods, (fn. 94) and the improvement in comfort and
speed (under 5 hours from Birmingham to London
by railway in 1840, (fn. 95) compared with about 11 hours
by road) (fn. 96) was obvious. At the same time the
competition of the railways forced the canal carriers
to lower their prices; (fn. 97) canal-borne merchandise
took at least three days to reach London, (fn. 98) and the
proportion carried by the railway rapidly increased. (fn. 99)
The development of railways aroused considerable opposition at this period; hostility to the
London and Birmingham Railway was especially
marked. (fn. 1) The fares charged and the virtual monopoly (fn. 2) exercised by the company in the carriage of
goods and passengers provided a rallying point for
the opponents of railways in general. The original
authorized capital for the company was £2½ million,
but as a result of the difficulty of the route (fn. 3) and the
need to provide more expensive station facilities
than were originally planned the paid-up capital
amounted to nearly £5 million by 1839. (fn. 4) Nevertheless the success of the enterprise was undeniable.
In 1841 eleven trains ran each day between London
and Birmingham, the first-class fare being £1 10s.,
the third-class £1. (fn. 5) The receipts from passenger
traffic were £557,000, and from goods £137,000,
each of these figures being higher than those for any
other company. (fn. 6) At this period the London and
Birmingham Railway was 'looked upon as the most
enlightened of the companies in its methods of
operation', (fn. 7) and between November 1839 and
March 1840 only 27 trains arrived at Birmingham
late, 754 being on time. (fn. 8)
While Birmingham's first two railways, the Grand
Junction and the London and Birmingham, providing routes north-west and south-east, were along
the most needed routes, there was incentive enough
for railway-building in other directions. In 1839 the
Birmingham and Derby Junction Railway provided,
by means of a branch from Whitacre to Hampton
on the London and Birmingham, (fn. 9) a railway route to
the north-east, and the last stretch of the main line,
between the Birmingham terminus at Lawley
Street and Whitacre Junction, was opened in 1842. (fn. 10)
This railway connected Birmingham to the North
Midland Railway, which gave access to Leeds and
Hull. South-west the Birmingham and Gloucester
Railway, authorized in 1836 (fn. 11) and providing a link
with the Great Western, had to cover difficult
country calling for the use of special engines. By
1840 trains were running from Gloucester to a
temporary passenger terminus at Camp Hill, and
next year a junction (the 'Gloucester Junction') was
made with the London and Birmingham line,
enabling the trains to enter Curzon Street station. (fn. 12)
Under an Act of 1845 (fn. 13) a further junction was made
between the Gloucester line and the Derby line, by
then part of the Midland company, with which the
Birmingham and Gloucester was amalgamated in
the following year. (fn. 14)
Three other railways to Birmingham were
authorized in 1846, at the height of the 'railway
mania'. The Birmingham, Wolverhampton and
Dudley Railway (fn. 15) and the Birmingham and Oxford
Junction Railway (fn. 16) formed a line through the
middle of Birmingham which connected at Oxford
with the Great Western system, with which these
two companies were amalgamated. They were
opened in 1854 and 1852 respectively. (fn. 17) The
Birmingham, Wolverhampton and Stour Valley
Railway, (fn. 18) which was built as a continuation of the
Grand Junction and the London and Birmingham
lines' extension into the middle of Birmingham, was
also opened in 1852. (fn. 19) In addition to these, a singletrack branch between Northfield on the Gloucester
line and Halesowen was also authorized in 1846, (fn. 20)
though it was not opened until 1884. (fn. 21)
Meanwhile the more important railway companies
had been competing to extend their sphere of
influence over the more recently constructed lines.
The Great Western and the Midland Counties
Railway struggled with each other to gain a foothold
in the growing network of railways projected around
Birmingham, (fn. 22) and the Midland, formed in 1844 to
include the Birmingham and Derby Junction
Railway, (fn. 23) gained possession of the Birmingham and
Gloucester Railway in 1846, (fn. 24) thus denying the
Great Western direct entry into the midlands. The
Birmingham and Oxford Junction Railway, however,
provided this when in 1852, the year of its completion, it became part of the Great Western system. (fn. 25)
The Great Western also finally acquired the
Birmingham, Wolverhampton and Dudley Railway,
which carried the line of the Birmingham and
Oxford beyond the town on the north-west side, in
1852. (fn. 26) The Grand Junction and the London and
Birmingham united, together with the Manchester
and Birmingham Railway, (fn. 27) in 1846 to form the
London and North-Western Railway, (fn. 28) and in the
following year this company acquired the Birmingham, Wolverhampton and Stour Valley Railway, (fn. 29)
which was still at an early stage of planning. All the
later lines in the district were built under the
auspices of one of these three large companies, and
the merging of the Midland and the London and
North-Western under the Railways Act of 1921 (fn. 30)
established the pattern of railway ownership that
survived until nationalization under the Transport
Act of 1947. (fn. 31)
Although the intricate history of the rivalry
between the railway companies is not properly part
of the history of Birmingham, the competitive
activities of the various companies had an effect on
the provision of railway communications to and
from Birmingham. The rivalry of the Birmingham
and Derby Junction Railway with the Midland
Counties Railway was responsible for the speed
with which the former's line was built, and for the
fact that the branch from Whitacre Junction to
Hampton was completed before the main line from
Birmingham to Whitacre Junction. (fn. 32) The projected
line of the Birmingham, Wolverhampton and
Dudley Railway promised a better route to Wolverhampton than that provided by the branch from the
Grand Junction line, and this fact underlay the
London and North-Western's acquisition of the
Birmingham, Wolverhampton and Stour Valley
Railway, the opening of which was delayed by intercompany rivalry. (fn. 33) The line from Birmingham to
Oxford was first sponsored by the Grand Junction
Railway, to break the London and Birmingham's
monopoly in traffic between London and Birmingham, and, especially after the amalgamation of the
Grand Junction and the London and Birmingham,
by the Great Western with the aim of extending the
run of broad-gauge railways. (fn. 34) An unfinished
branch line (fn. 35) from Bordesley station towards
Curzon Street station survives as evidence of one
railway company's desire to prevent the fulfilment
of a project which it had imposed on another
company. (fn. 36)
The four earliest of Birmingham's railways all
arrived at the town by the Rea valley, and the two
terminal stations, Curzon Street and Lawley Street,
were conveniently close together. The convenience
was greater, however, for traffic using Birmingham
merely as a railway junction than for traffic whose
origin or destination was Birmingham. Horsedrawn carriages took passengers between Curzon
Street and the centre of Birmingham. The distance
of about a mile, combined with the inevitable change
of vehicles, took a disproportionate length of time,
and the location of the stations on the eastern edge
of Birmingham diminished the advantages of railway communication for passengers, and particularly
for goods, whose journey began north, west or
south of the town's centre. As this inconvenience
became apparent, and as plans for railways between
Birmingham and Wolverhampton took shape, the
decision was taken to build the railways through the
centre of the town and to establish the main stations
there. Despite the expense of acquiring land and
building cuttings and tunnels, the London and
North-Western decided in 1846, the year of its
formation, to close Curzon Street station to passenger traffic and to build New Street station. (fn. 37) Though
designed primarily for the London and Birmingham,
the Grand Junction, and the Stour Valley lines,
New Street station was later enlarged to allow the
Midland Railway to run its trains between Derby or
Leicester and Bristol through central Birmingham.
The station was opened for the Stour Valley line in
1852 and for the London, Manchester and Liverpool
lines in 1854; it was first used by the Midland
Railway in 1854. (fn. 38) Snow Hill station was opened in
1852. (fn. 39) The effect of the building of these stations
and railway lines on the shape of central Birmingham
has been indicated above. (fn. 40) Apart from making
easier the journeys between Birmingham and distant
towns, they also made possible the development of
suburban railway traffic.
The early railways from Birmingham were
planned almost exclusively for long distance traffic.
The number of intermediate suburban stations
before the fifties was negligible. Near the centre of
the town Vauxhall station and Camp Hill station,
built as temporary termini, survived as intermediate
stations after the extension of the lines. (fn. 41) Apart from
Vauxhall, Perry Barr station was the only intermediate station within the modern city on the Grand
Junction line built at the same period as the railway
itself. On the London and Birmingham line Stechford station (opened 1844) was the only intermediate
station built before 1860. On the Birmingham and
Derby Junction Railway two intermediate stations,
Bromford Forge and Castle Bromwich, were opened
at the same time as the railway, but Bromford Forge
was closed the next year and was reopened for
race-course traffic only as Bromford Bridge station
in 1896. On the Gloucester line there were, apart
from Camp Hill, stations at King's Heath and
Lifford opened in 1840, the year the railway was
opened, one at King's Norton opened in 1849, and
one at Longbridge opened in 1840 and closed in
1849. The building of the new main stations allowed
those who worked in the centre of Birmingham to
get there by train from such suburban stations as
existed, and the new lines (the Birmingham and
Oxford Junction, the Stour Valley, and the Birmingham, Wolverhampton and Dudley) which were
the principal justification for the new main stations
had less of the character of trunk lines than the older
railways.
The possibility of suburban railway travel thus
presented was realized through the building of a
number of intermediate stations (fn. 42) and the opening
of new suburban lines. When the Birmingham,
Wolverhampton and Dudley line was opened in
1854 three stations within the modern city (Hockley,
Soho and Winson Green, and Handsworth and
Smethwick) were also opened. On the Stour Valley
line Monument Lane station, a mile from New
Street, was opened in 1854 and Winson Green
station, a little further out, in 1876. On the Oxford
line stations were built at Acock's Green (1852),
Bordesley (1855), and Small Heath (1863). Intermediate stations were also opened on the older lines;
on the Grand Junction lines at Aston (1854), Great
Barr (1862), and Witton (1876); on the London and
Birmingham line at Adderley Park (1860); on the
Birmingham and Derby line at Saltley (1854); and
on the Gloucester line at Moseley (1867), Northfield
(1869), Brighton Road (1875), and Hazelwell (1903).
The rapid building in the fifties of suburban stations
on the through-routes was followed by the opening
of railways specifically designed for a suburban
population. The Sutton Coldfield Railway, an offshoot of the London and North-Western, was
authorized in 1859 and opened, with stations at
Gravelly Hill and Erdington, in 1862. (fn. 43) Another
offshoot of the London and North-Western, the
Harborne Railway, was authorized in 1866 and
opened in 1874: (fn. 44) it passed through rapidly extending suburbs (fn. 45) and had four stations in little over two
miles. The Birmingham West Suburban Railway
was authorized in 1871 to run from a terminus at
Granville Street, north of Five Ways, to a junction
with the Gloucester line at King's Norton. (fn. 46) It was
under the wing of the Midland and in 1873 Parliament authorized the extension of the line to New
Street station (fn. 47) so that the Midland (with which the
new line was incorporated in 1875) (fn. 48) might use it
as part of a through-route, but it was planned and
to a great extent run as a suburban line. It was
opened in 1876, with five stations including the
terminus at Granville Street. (fn. 49) When the line was
extended in 1885 to New Street station an intermediate station at Five Ways replaced the terminus
at Granville Street. Another suburban route was the
London and North-Western's branch between the
Grand Junction and the Stour Valley lines, which
was authorized in 1883 and opened in 1886, (fn. 50) and
on which stations were opened at Soho Road (1889)
and Handsworth Wood (1896). This was one of two
branches built by the London and North-Western
to by-pass the centre of Birmingham; the other,
opened in 1880, was a stretch of railway without
stations between Stechford and Aston. (fn. 51) The same
period saw the extension of railway works in the
Saltley area, the construction of a branch from
Aston to the gas-works by Great Lister Street, (fn. 52) and
the opening of a line between Northfield and
Halesowen, which was run jointly by the Midland
and the Great Western. (fn. 53) The last suburban line to
be built within the area of the modern city was the
Birmingham, North Warwickshire and Stratford
on-Avon Railway, and like the Birmingham West
Suburban it also served as a through route, making
a short cut for the Great Western between Wolverhampton and Bristol. The line was authorized in
1894, and the company promoting it was taken over
by the Great Western in 1900. (fn. 54) It was opened for
goods traffic in 1907 and for passenger traffic in
1908, (fn. 55) and the stations opened then included those
at Hall Green and Yardley Wood. A new station
had also been opened at Tyseley, where the North
Warwickshire line joined the Oxford line, in 1906.
The extra pressure which the opening of this line
caused at Snow Hill station was relieved by the
building of a new terminus at Moor Street: a
temporary station was opened in 1909 and a
permanent one in 1914. (fn. 56)

RAILWAYS
It is not possible to assess by the use of statistics
the boost which the railways gave to the expansion
of Birmingham, but it is fair to say that that
expansion, from 1837 onwards, was dependent on
the lines of communication provided by the railways.
In the first place, the opening of trunk lines enabled
more direct commercial contacts between Birmingham and the markets for its manufactures as well as
providing the opportunity for quicker industrial
turnover through the more rapid movement of goods
and raw materials. As the railway network was
extended, manufacturers established their factories
near goods depots or built their own private
branches, so that Birmingham's industries expanded,
geographically, along the lines of the railways. The
increasing number of work-people, prevented by
their numbers from living close to their places of
employment, were able to travel to and from work
by suburban trains, and at the same time as the
railways made the spread of suburban housing
possible the location of lines and stations to a large
extent determined its pattern. (fn. 57)
Since the First World War, however, Birmingham's railway system has contracted rather than
expanded. A new station was opened at Spring Road
on the North Warwickshire line in 1919, but since
then only two new stations have been opened in
Birmingham (Lea Hall, opened 1939; Longbridge,
opened 1954), and no new railways have been
built. The tram services of the city, suffering from
some of the same limitations as the railways, did not
seriously compete for passenger traffic, but the
growing use of the more adaptable motor omnibuses
and of bicycles and cars drew passengers away from
the railways, and, from a later date, the advantages of
road haulage over the railway goods services became
apparent. The station at Church Road on the
Birmingham West Suburban line was the first to
close (in 1925) in the face of this competition, and
the stations on each side of it were closed in 1930
and 1944. The Harborne Railway was not used for
passenger traffic after 1934, and all the stations on
the Gloucester line north of King's Norton were
closed in 1940 and 1941. (fn. 58)