1 Edward I - 4 edward I (nos 238–294)
Please of the crown 1 edward I [1272–3] (fn. 1)
238. Adam de Durham encountered Richard de Castle Baynard and
Richard de Pek of Norfolk, servants of Robert de Teyford, in the ward of
Henry le Waleys [Cordwainer ward]. A quarrel broke out among them and
Richard and Richard killed Adam. They at once fled and are suspected, so
let them be exacted and outlawed according to the custom of the City. (fn. 2) No
chattels, but they were harboured in the ward outside frankpledge, so the
alderman and the whole ward are in mercy. Robert de Teyford who was
attached for the death, comes and is not suspected, so he is quit. All the
neighbours come and are not suspected, so they are quit.
239. John de Shordiche killed Peter son of John de Stonhall in the ward of
Anketin de Auverne [Farringdon ward]. He at once fled and is suspected, so
let him be exacted and outlawed according to the custom of the City. (fn. 3) No
chattels nor frankpledge because he was a stranger. John, Peter's brother,
was attached for the death because he was present, but he does not come
and is not suspected. He was attached by Joce the king's purveyor
(emptorem) (fn. 4) and William de Enefeld. So they are all in *mercy. Hugh le
Chapeyler, Peter de Durham and William the Cook, three neighbours, do
not come and are not suspected. Hugh was attached by Alexander Russel
and Stephen Brian, Peter by Richard le Couriur and Nicholas the Cook,
William by William de Ware cobbler (sutorem) and Nicholas de Wenham.
So they are all in *mercy. Afterwards Peter de Durham comes and is not
suspected, so he is quit; nothing from him or his pledges, [cf. 560]
240. [m. 13] Roger de Chevendre of Sheperton was sailing in a ship which
belonged to Robert Burnell when he fell from the ship and was drowned.
Value of the ship *2 marks (deodandum) for which the sheriffs are to answer.
Hubert the Tailor, a neighbour, does not come and is not suspected. He was
attached by Stephen de Suffolk baker and Richard le Fevere. So they are in
mercy. Afterwards the mayor and aldermen testify that Master Geoffrey de
Shankerton clerk of Robert de Burnell took the ship for the use of his
master, so *to judgment on him. Because the chamberlain made no enquiry
concerning the ship, to judgment on him. No one is suspected. Judgment:
misadventure, [cf. 562]
241. Adam son of Robert Monsorel killed Richard de Wycombe in a seld
in the parish of St. Mary le Bow. He at once fled to the church, confessed
the deed and abjured the realm before the chamberlain and sheriffs. No
chattels, but he was harboured in the ward of Cheap outside frankpledge, so
the alderman and the whole ward are in * mercy (pro franco plegio). All the
neighbours come except Richard de St. Botolph and he is not suspected. He
was attached by Henry le Wympler and Robert Grapefig. So they are in
*mercy. Because the chamberlain made no enquiry concerning those who
were present in the seld and did not order them to be attached, to judgment
on him. [cf. 561, 721]
242. John de Tuffel took sanctuary in the church of St. Peter Wodestrete,
confessed that he had committed several thefts and abjured the realm. No
chattels nor frankpledge because he was a stranger.
243. In the same year, the same being chamberlain and Peter Cusin and
Robert de Meldeburne, who answer now, being sheriffs; on Thursday
before the feast of St. Edmund the king [17 Nov. 1272] William Blauet
encountered Robert son of Oskin and Walter de Wodeham in the ward of
Peter de Aunger [Broad Street ward], and they immediately attacked and
killed him. They at once fled and are suspected, so let them be exacted and
outlawed according to the custom of the City. (fn. 5) No chattels, but they were
harboured in the ward outside frankpledge, so the alderman and the whole
ward are in *mercy. Thereupon it is testified that John de Wodeforde, Adam
de Wynton', Richard de Wautham, Robert de Tame, Robert de Beri,
William de Tykenham, Richard de Rothing, Thomas Frere and William
Cok' were arrested on suspicion of the death, but delivered by jury before
John de Cobeham justice [of gaol delivery] at Neuwegate. John is present
and proffers his rolls which testify to this. All the neighbours come and are
not suspected, so they are quit.
244. Simon le Waleys servant of Master Reymund de Nogeriis (fn. 6) killed
Laurence le Barbur near the New Temple. He at once fled and is suspected,
so let him be exacted and outlawed (fn. 7) No chattels nor frankpledge, but he was
in the mainpast of Reymund. So he is in *mercy. All the neighbours come
except Hubert the Tailor, Ellis Picard and John le Vinere and they are not
suspected. Hubert was attached by Hugh le Broier and John le Taillur, John
by Richard Sotewy and Nicholas de Oxford, Ellis by William le Brewere
and William de Suffolk. So they are all in *mercy. [cf. 563]
245. Alice widow of Michael le Mareschal appealed in the husting William
le Noreis, Robert Randolf, Ralph the Priest (Sacerdotem) of Hakeneye,
William son of Ralph le Lung clerk, William Turgis, Richard de Hoke,
Robert de Hull, Robert Swain, William Tuler and Robert Prituse of the
death of her husband Michael. She does not come and it is testified that she
has died, so nothing from her or her pledges. Robert Randolf, William
Turgis, Richard de Hoke, Robert de Hull, Robert Swain, William le Tuler
and Robert Prituse come, but the others do not. So let the truth -be ascertained by jury. Robert Randolf and the others who come, asked how they
wish to clear themselves, say that they freely put themselves upon the verdict
of forty-two men from the three aldermanries nearest to the place where the
incident occurred. Because they are strangers this is granted to them. The
forty-two men, sworn before the justices to tell the truth, say on their oath
that none of them is guilty of the death except Ralph the Chaplain (Capellanum) of Hakeneye, William son of Ralph le Lung clerk and William le
Noreys, so the others are quit. Ralph, William and William are to be exacted
and outlawed and because they are of Middlesex, let them be exacted and
outlawed there. There is to be an enquiry concerning chattels and frankpledge in the hundred of Osolvestane, and the sheriff is ordered to produce
on the morrow twelve men from the hundred. Robert Randolf, William
Turgis, Richard atte Hoke, Robert de Hull, Robert Swain, William le Tuler
and Robert Prituse were previously arrested and released publicly on the
king's command; Robert being released to William de Harenges, Robert le
Marchaunt, John Goldeston, Robert de Shakewell, all of Hakeney, Henry
Attelane of Shoredych, Richard the Clerk, John Aston, John Pode, Richard
Alward, Richard le Veer, Robert le Rus, all of Hakeneye, and John de
Store of Stebenheth; William Turgis to William le Veer, William Charle,
Henry le Scoueler, John le Veer, Thomas le Freman, all of Hakeney,
Richard le Wodere of Stebenheth, Richard Chapman of Hakeneye, William
Bisshop of Hakeneye, Laurence Mauntel of Haliwell, John atte Hoke,
William le Fevere, Warin Grosile, all of Hakeneye; Richard Attehoke to
William atte Mersce, John atte Hegge, both of Hakeneye, Edmund Kyse of
Stebenhethe, William atte Grove, Robert Roger, Warin Silketop, Richard
Leuis, Adinette Merke, Richard le Canon, Richard Pige, Richard Gilbert
and William Warin, all of Hakeney; Robert del Hull to William Bruning,
Richard son of Robert of Hakeney, Alan son of Philip of the same, William
Attebrok, Roger Bruning, Robert Attewell, Robert atte Merk, Richard
Attehull, Richard son of Peter, Warm Attestile, and William Goding, all of
Stebenhethe; Robert Swain to Adam de Caldelonde of Stebenhethe,
Richard Attepyre of Iseldone, William Pig, Robert Coleman, Osbert
Attewell, Richard Osbern, John Atteasse, Richard Patrick, John Silketop
and Walter le Wodeward, all of Hakeney; William le Tuler to Brouning
Mauntel, Richard Mauntel, John le Pil, William Wranghora, Richard atte
Well, Reginald Alvene, Robert Nicol, Godfrey le Tuler, Paulinus Heron,
Daniel le Tuler, all of Shordiche, Herion of Hoxton, Adam Herion of the
same; Robert Prituse to Robert Atteponde of Hakeney, Henry le Nas of
Stebenheth, Richard le Vair, Reginald le Neuman, Alan Dusse, William
Brid, all of Hakeney, Solomon Atteclive of Stebenhethe, Richard Artur of
Hakeneye, John Coding of Stebenhuthe, Hugh Coding of the same, John
son of Robert of Edelmeton and John le Sondere of Stebenheth; they (fn. 9) were
to have them here on the first day and did not have them. So they are in
*mercy. Afterwards twelve men from the hundred come and say on their
oath that Ralph, William and William had no chattels and were not in
frankpledge because they were vagabonds, [cf. 564]
Nota 80. Appellum in hustengo. Acquietanciaper xlii homines. Quod forinceci exigantur
in comitatibus de quibus sunt [cf. 524 no. 80].
Pleas of the crown 2 edward I [1273–4]
246. In the same year, Gregory de Roqesley being chamberlain and Henry
de Coventre and Nicholas de Wynton' being sheriffs; John Coubely and
Richard Wert were with others on a ship at the wharf of Laurence Hardel, (fn. 10)
loading it with wine, when a quarrel broke out among them; Stephen le
Esert came up to strike John and John seeing this fell out of the ship into
the water in avoiding the blow and was drowned. Stephen was afterwards
arrested and delivered by jury before John de Cobham at Neugate, so
nothing from him. Laurence de Amewell was attached because he was on
the ship at the time, but he does not come and is not suspected. He was
attached by Richard de Ware and Henry de Ware. So they are all in mercy.
Because the sheriffs did not attach William Skinnere of Ware and the others
who were on the ship and because the chamberlain made no mention of
their names in his roll, to judgment on the chamberlain and sheriffs. All the
neighbours come and are not suspected, so they are quit. Afterwards the
mayor and aldermen testify that Richard Werry [sic] was arrested and
detained in prison at Neugate and afterwards released publicly by royal writ
to Simon le Clerk 'bereman', [Edmund] (fn. †) de Suffolk vintner, Walter de
[Gloucestre], (fn. †) Walter le Pender, Robert de Rotherhethe, Henry le Wowere
'bereman', Roger le [Seler], (fn. †) Geoffrey le Weringe, Robert de Ware, Solomon
le Juvin, Adam Spendelove 'bereman' and William [Barber servant] (fn. †) of
John Adrian to have him here on the first day and they did not have him.
So they are in mercy. Richard comes and is not suspected, so he is quit. [cf.
565]
247. [m. 13d] Christine de London while drawing water from the bottom
of a vat (in fundendo aquam in quadam cuva) fell into the vat and died soon
afterwards. Value of the vat 2s. (deodanduni) for which the sheriffs are to
answer. All the neighbours come and are not suspected, so they are quit. No
one else is suspected. (fn. 11) Judgment: misadventure.
248. Robert son of Roger fell from a ship into the Thames and was
drowned. Value of the ship *20s. (deodandum) for which the sheriffs are to
answer. No one else is suspected. Judgment: misadventure.
249. Miles le Coureur killed Henry de Kent in the ward of Henry de
Coventre [Vintry ward]. He was at once arrested for the death and taken
to Neugate, where before John de Cobham he was released to Nicholas le
Coureur, Thomas de Norwich, William Knith, John de Cruce Roes,
Geoffrey le Botoner, Henry le Crepiner, John de Grey, John Goldrik, John
Lucas, Richard le Bukeler, Abraham le Traiere and Gilbert le Coureur to
have him here on the first day and they did not have him. So they are all in
mercy. Miles comes and, asked how he wishes to clear himself, for good or
ill puts himself upon the verdict of forty-two men from the three aldermanries nearest to the place where the incident occurred; sworn before the
justices to tell the truth, they say on their oath that he is not guilty of the
death and was not present when Henry was killed, so he is quit. (Acquietacio
per xlii.) Asked who did kill Henry, they say it was John de la Marche, so
let him be exacted and outlawed. (fn. 14) No chattels. Asked also at whose instigation Miles was arrested and charged with the death, they say that it was at
the instigation of Roger le Petite, servant of Henry de Coventre, who
accused him out of hatred, so let him be arrested. (Capiatur de abetto.) John
de Cobham put on record that the pledges undertook to produce Miles at
the king's will. Miles comes now to stand to right, so it is adjudged that his
pledges are quit of amercement, [cf. 566]
Nota 81. Deplegiis amerciatis quia non habuerunt primo die itineris [cf. 524 no. 81].
250. John le Gaunter and his wife Agnes beat Isabel widow of Geoffrey le
Sachier in the ward of Walter le Poter [Cornhill ward]. Isabel escaped from
them, but afterwards at nightfall John went to her house and killed her with
a knife. He at once returned home, took all his goods and fled with his wife
Agnes. He is suspected, so let him be exacted and outlawed. (fn. 15) No chattels, but
he was harboured in the ward outside frankpledge, so the alderman and the
whole ward are in *mercy (pro franco plegio). The mayor and aldermen,
asked whether Agnes was an accomplice in the death, say that she was, so
let her be exacted and waived. (fn. 15) All the neighbours come except Robert de
Kydemenstre and he is not suspected. He was attached by William le
Engleis and Walter de Welles. So they are all in *mercy. Afterwards it is
testified that John was in the frankpledge of Humphrey le Tailur and John
Cristemes. So they are in *mercy, and nothing from the ward. [cf. 567]
251. A boy called Bartholomew fell from a boat into the Thames and was
drowned. Value of the boat 2s. (deodandum) for which the sheriffs are to
answer. No one else is suspected. Judgment: misadventure.
252. William de Boys killed William le Clerk in Bradestrate. He at once
fled and is suspected, so let him be exacted and outlawed according to the
custom of the City. (fn. 16) No chattels, but he was harboured in the ward of
Anketin de Auverne [Farringdon ward], so the alderman and the whole
ward are in *mercy. Nicholas de Goreham 'fruter' and John le Cordwaner,
two neighbours, do not come and are not suspected. Nicholas was attached
by Andrew le Barbur and Michael le Tailur, John by James the Cook and
Richard le Barbur. So they are in *mercy. [cf. 568]
253. Peter de Perone, a lunatic (lunaticus), fell out of a window in a house
in the ward of Douegate and died. Sauncelina, who was in the house at the
time, was attached, but does not come and is not suspected. She was
attached by Walter de la Forde and Adam de Walsingham. So they are in
*mercy. All the neighbours come except William de Mare 'gaunter' and he
is not suspected. He was attached by Ellis Shadde and Robert de Horsham
'boghyer'. So they are in *mercy. No one else is suspected. Judgment: misadventure, [cf. 569]
Pleas of the crown 3 edward I [1274–5]
254. In the same year, the same being chamberlain and Luke de Batencurt,
for whom no one answers, and Henry de Frouwyk, who answers now, being
sheriffs; Henry de Suffolk fell from a step in the house of Luke de Batencurt
and died. Value of the step ½ mark (deodandum) for which Henry de Frouwyk
is to answer. Guillot le Moler, who was in the house at the time, was
attached, but does not come and is not suspected. He was attached by
Hubert de Arraz and Ralph de Rumford. So they are in *mercy. All the
neighbours come and are not suspected. No one else is suspected. Judgment:
misadventure, [cf. 570]
255. Adam de Ramesey, Roger Aledrawere, Motekin de Sussex and
William le Careter, servants of Adam de Brok, canon of St. Paul's London,
killed his cook Simon in Adam's house within the churchyard of St. Paul's.
They at once fled and are suspected, so let them be exacted and outlawed
according to the custom of the City. (fn. 17) No chattels, and they were not in
frankpledge because they were living within the precincts (sanctuarium) of
the church. All the neighbours come and are not suspected, so they are quit.
256. Richard de Lamenesse bailiff with his servant Richard, William le
Bret, Geoffrey le Taverner, John de Horsepol, Walter le Taverner, John le
Taverner and William Shepesheved went to the house of Emma Louel in
the ward of Nicholas de Winton' [Langbourn ward], to arrest some thieves
who were being harboured there, as they thought. They entered the house
and found no one there except Emma and her maid-servants, but John de
Horsepol and William le Bret went out of the house and in the courtyard
they found Richard de Veer, chaplain, hiding in a gutter (stillicidio); they
at once assaulted and wounded him, so that he died in the third week after.
So the sheriff is ordered to arrest them. Afterwards Richard de Laymenes,
his servant Richard, William le Bret, John de Horsepol and William
Shepesheved were arrested and they come now. Asked how they wish to
clear themselves, John de Horsepol says that he was previously arrested for
the death and delivered by men from the three wards (wardis) nearest to the
place where the incident occurred before John de Cobham at Neugate. John
de Cobham is present and puts this on record from his rolls, so let him be
quit. Richard and the others, except William le Bret, deny the charge and
for good or ill put themselves upon the verdict of forty-two men from the
three aldermanries nearest to the place; sworn before the justices, they say
on their oath that they are not guilty of the death, so they are quit. William
le Bret says that he is a clerk and is not bound to answer here. Thereupon
Richard de Berwes, proctor of the bishop of London, comes and claims him
as a clerk; but that it may be known [for what he is to be handed over], let
the truth be ascertained by the forty-two men; they say he is not guilty of
the death, so he is quit. Asked who killed Richard, they say it was Geoffrey
le Taverner, who has now absconded and is suspected, so let him be exacted
and outlawed according to the custom of the City. (fn. 19) No chattels.
Nota 82. De quodam ballivo Civitatis et aliis acquietatis per xlii homines trium wardarum
[cf. 524 no. 82].
257. Andrew le Sarazin, who was suffering from a fever, consulted Master
John de Hexham and Master Semann his brother, doctors (medics), that
they might cure him; John sent Master William de Crek to give him pills
(pilas) and Andrew at once ordered his valet Richard de Langeley to look
after them. Later Andrew and Richard his valet ate such a quantity of the
pills that they died soon after. Master William de Crek comes and the mayor
and aldermen say in the faith in which they are bound to the king that they
do not suspect him of the death, so he is quit. Masters John and Semann
were arrested and imprisoned at Neugate; John is now dead, but Semann
is living in the City and it is not known how he was delivered from prison,
so to judgment on the sheriffs for the escape. The sheriff is ordered to arrest
him. Simon Malon [sic], Bartholomew de Raban, Otto de Gask, Henry
Fos . . ., Geoffrey servant of Simon Malur [sic], Geoffrey servant of Otto,
John the Cook and Nicholas Page were attached because they were present
in the house when Andrew and Richard died, but they do not come and are
not suspected. They were attached by Thomas le Taillur, John de Shordiche,
William de Enefeud, Ralph de Araz, Ranulph de Hexham, David le Escot
and John le Taillur. So they are all in *mercy. All the neighbours come and
are not suspected, so they are quit. Afterwards Semann comes and for good
or ill puts himself upon the verdict of the mayor and citizens. Because the
suspicion is slight, this is granted to him by licence of the justices. The
mayor and aldermen say in the faith in which they are bound to the king
that he is not guilty of the death, so he is quit. Asked in whose custody he
was when he was previously arrested for the death, Semann says that Luke
de Batencurt sheriff arrested and imprisoned him, then took ½ mark from
him and allowed him to go. The mayor and aldermen testify to this, so to
judgment on Luke. Henry de Frowyk is quit of the escape, [cf. 571]
258. Geoffrey Whiting and his wife Alice came out of a tavern together and,
a quarrel arising between them, Geoffrey suffocated Alice. He at once fled
and is suspected, so let him be exacted and outlawed according to the
custom of the City. (fn. 20) Chattels 3s. for which the sheriffs are to answer. In
addition he had 100s. which Ponce de Mora owed to him. So John Horn
and Ralph le Blunt sheriffs are ordered to raise that sum from Ponce's lands
and chattels and to answer for it to the king. He was harboured in the ward
of Henry de Coventre [Vintry ward] outside frankpledge, so the alderman
and the whole ward are in *mercy. Isabel la Frauncis, who was attached for
the death, comes and is not suspected, so she is quit. All the neighbours come
except Peter le Cotiler and he is not suspected. He was attached by John de
Castello and Leo the Clerk. So they are in mercy. Afterwards [m. 14] the
mayor and aldermen testify that Geoffrey was in the frankpledge of Walter
de Abeton and Robert le Messager, so the frankpledges are in mercy and
the ward is quit of amercement for the harbouring, [cf. 267, 572]
259. William Sipring was trying to drag a ship into the Thames when the
rope by which he was dragging it broke and he fell into the water and was
drowned. Value of the ship *6s. 3d. (deodandum) for which the sheriffs are
to answer. Robert le Taillur, a neighbour, does not come. He was attached
by Austin le Taillur and Michael the Tailor. So they are all in *mercy. No
one else is suspected. Judgment: misadventure, [cf. 574]
260. Peter de Burdeus servant of Reymund de Burdeus, killed John de
Gaunt 'eskirmesur' with a knife in the house of Robert le Mareschall. He
at once fled to the church of St. Paul's London, but later escaped from the
church and has now absconded; he is suspected, so let him be exacted and
outlawed according to the custom of the City. (fn. 21) No chattels, but he was in the
mainpast of Reymund. So he is in *mercy. All the neighbours come and are
not suspected, so they are quit. Robert le Mareschall, Hugh le Orfevere,
Gilbert Trille, Richard Bonaventure, John Viel, Richard his brother, and
Ralph de Balesham were attached because they were present, come and are
not suspected, so they are quit. Ismania wife of Robert le Mareschall and
Master Thomas le Surigien were also present at the time, but do not come
and are not suspected. They were attached by Henry de Roff, Thomas
Fyntard, Adam le Barbur, James the Cook, Michael le Taillur and Nicholas
de Gatham. So they are in *mercy. [cf. 573]
261. Robert le Gras and his wife Isabel, and John de Benteley and his wife
Isabel appealed Richard Taillehaste that on Saturday before Christmas 2
Edward I [23 Dec. 1273] he went to Robert and Isabel's house in Wodestrate,
broke down the door and entered; he beat and ill-treated the two Isabels
whom he found inside so that as a result of the beating they both afterwards
gave birth to still-born boys, and stole a silver brooch worth ½ mark from
Isabel wife of John; that he did this wickedly and feloniously they offer [to
prove]. Richard comes and denies the death, robbery and everything. He
says that previously when they were at the busting the appellors made no
mention of the robbery and did not appeal him in the proper form, but only
made a simple plaint; so he seeks judgment whether he is bound to answer
their appeal. This having been allowed, it is adjudged that the appeal be
null. Robert and all the others are to be committed to gaol for a false appeal.
To preserve the king's peace let the truth be ascertained by jury. Richard,
asked how he wishes to clear himself, says that he is a clerk. Thereupon
Richard de Berwes, minor canon of St. Paul's London, and by letters of the
bishop of London etc. comes and claims him as a clerk; but that it may be
known for what he is to be handed over, let the truth be ascertained by the
neighbourhood. Forty-two men from the three nearest aldermanries, sworn
before the justices, say on their oath that he is not guilty of death, robbery
or any other crime, so he is quit.
Nota 83. De appello in hustengo facto et posted quassato coram justiciariis. Clericus ad
sectam regis acquietatus per xlii [cf. 524 no. 83].
262. Alexander de Bestenore of Buckinghamshire took sanctuary in the
church of St. Botolph without Aldresgate, William de Fremingham in the
church of St. Giles without Cripelgate and Margaret de Wengham in the
church of St. Michael Bassieshawe. They confessed that they had burgled
houses, stolen horses and committed other thefts and abjured the realm
before the chamberlain and sheriffs. Alexander's chattels *1 mark for which
the sheriffs are to answer. The others had no chattels and were not in frankpledge because they were strangers, [cf. 574]
263. Richard Scot of Northumberland, John Ismongere of Fremingham
and Richard le Clerk of Winchester broke out of Neugate prison where they
were imprisoned for theft and fled to the church of the Friars Minor
London. They confessed that they had broken out of prison and abjured the
realm before the chamberlain and sheriffs, so to judgment on the sheriffs for
the escape. No chattels because they were strangers, [cf. 575]
264. John le Jovene 'weder' was found killed in his house in the parish of
St. Mary Abechirche. Robert de Paris tailor, William de Derbi and Alan de
Hakeny were accused of the death and arrested. They come and deny the
death and everything and put themselves upon the verdict of forty-two men
from the three aldermanries nearest to the place where the death occurred,
because they are strangers and not of the liberty of the City. These men,
sworn before the justices to tell the truth, say on their oath that none of
them is guilty of the death, so they are quit. The mayor and aldermen are
asked who killed John and say in the faith in which they are bound to the
king that Robert de Bannebury, Walter Cadaz, Roger de Asseborne and
Geoffrey clerk of the church of St. James Graschirche (fn. 24) encountered John in
the ward of Thomas de Basingge [Candlewick ward] and beat and wounded
him so that he died. Robert, Walter and Roger at once fled and are suspected, so let them be exacted and outlawed according to the custom of the
City. (fn. 25) Walter Cadaz' chattels *16d. for which the sheriffs are to answer. The
others had no chattels. Geoffrey the Clerk took sanctuary in the church, but
comes now in the king's peace to stand to right before the justices. Asked
how he wishes to clear himself of the death he says that he is a clerk and is
not bound to answer here. Thereupon Richard de Herwes minor canon of
London comes and claims him as a clerk by letters of the bishop of London
testifying that the bishop entrusted him his authority to claim clergy. But
that it may be known for what he is to be handed over, let the truth be
ascertained by the forty-two men; the jury say on their oath that he is guilty,
so as such let him be handed over to the bishop. No chattels. Hugh de
Gloucester, Godfrey le Barber, Robert atte Wodecote and Robert le Weder
were present when the incident occurred, but are not suspected, so they are
quit. All the neighbours come and are not suspected, so they are all quit.
Afterwards Robert de Bannebyr', who was arrested for the death, comes
and denies the death and everything and puts himself for good or ill on the
verdict of forty-two men from the three aldermanries nearest to the place
where the incident occurred, because he is a stranger and not of the liberty
of the City; these men, sworn before the justices to tell the truth, say on
their oath that he is not guilty of the death nor of any crime, so he is quit.
Nothing from his outlawry, [cf. 576]
Nota 84. De extraneis acquietatis per xlii. Quod maior et aldermanni dicent quis occidit
mortuum. De clerico convicto per xlii et liberate episcopo. De extraneo acquietato per
xlii [cf. 524 no. 84].
265. Abraham le Treyer and his wife Brunamia complain that on Monday
before the feast of the Nativity of Mary 3 Edward I [2 Sep. 1275] Maud de
Stanes went to their house in the parish of St. Michael Bassinggeshawe and
against the peace etc. beat, wounded and ill-treated Brunamia, so that she
was maimed; whence they say that they have suffered damage and loss to
the value etc. and they produce witnesses. Maud comes and denies the force
and injury. She strongly denies that she ever beat or maimed Brunamia as
she is accused and puts herself upon the verdict of the aldermen who in the
faith in which they are bound to the king testify to this. So it is adjudged that
Maud is quit and Abraham and Brunamia be committed to gaol; but they
are pardoned at the instance of John de Cobeham.
Nota 85. Querela de transgressione [cf. 524 no. 85].
266. Walter son of Adam le Huyrer appealed in the husting Martin Horn
of wounds and battery. He does not come or prosecute his appeal, so let
him be arrested and his pledges to prosecute are in *mercy, viz. Robert le
Cordwaner and Robert brother of Walter. Martin comes now. So let the
truth be ascertained by the mayor and aldermen; they say in the faith in
which they are bound to the king [blank]. He was previously arrested and
released to John of St. Albans, Philip the Tawyer, Adam de Ismongerelane,
Robert the Cook, Alan le Barbur and Robert le Burser to have him here on
the first day and they did not have him. So they are in *mercy. [cf. 576]
267. John de Calabre 'bereman' appealed in the busting Geoffrey Whyting
of wounds and battery. He does not come, so let him be arrested and his
pledges to prosecute are in mercy, viz. Richard Rose and Alexander Codeford. Geoffrey does not come. He was attached by Peter Guillame, Martin
le Criur, Walter Saule and Richard Pighe. So they are all in *mercy. To
preserve the king's peace let the truth be ascertained by the mayor and
citizens; they say in the faith in which they are bound to the king [blank],
[cf. 258, 577]
268. Alice daughter of Ralph of New Place (de Novo Loco) appealed in the
husting Maud de Kent of wounds and battery. She does not come, so let her
be arrested and her pledges to prosecute are in mercy, viz. Walter Winter
and Alan le Mazon. Maud does not come and was not attached, so to
judgment on the sheriffs.
269. Adam le Burser was killed in the parish of St. Botolph without
Aldresgate. William de Beverle was arrested for the death and comes now.
Thereupon John de Cobeham, justice, puts on record that William was
previously convicted by jury before him at Neugate of killing Adam in selfdefence because he could not otherwise avoid his own death, for which he
was committed to prison until he should obtain the king's grace. So let him
be kept in custody until the king shall make known his will. The four
neighbours come and are not suspected, so they are quit.
Nota 86. De quodam deliberate coram justiciariis itinerantibus per recordum justiciarii
de Neugate [cf. 524 no. 86].
Pleas of the crown 4 edward I [1275–6] (fn. 28)
270. In the same year, Gregory de Roqeley being chamberlain and John
Horn and Ralph le Blunt being sheriffs; Robert Scot 'bereman' was crushed
to death while carrying a load of lead. Value of the lead 2s. for which the
sheriffs are to answer. No one is suspected. Judgment: misadventure.
271. [m. 14d] Isabel widow of John Picot appealed in the husting (fn. 30) John de
Arundel of the death of her husband John. She comes and prosecutes her
appeal, but John does not come. So Isabel is told to go to the husting and
prosecute him there until he be outlawed according to the law and custom
of the City. Thereupon it is testified that Henry le Taverner and Robert
Hodin were at the time crossing the road where the incident occurred and
the mayor and aldermen in no way suspect them, so nothing from them.
John de Oxford, a neighbour, does not come and is not suspected. He was
attached by Richard de Export and John Wyther. So they are in *mercy. [cf.
578]
Nota 87. Appellum in hustengo. Et quia appellatus non venit coram justiciariis, ideo
appellans redeat ad hustengum quosque etc. [cf. 524 no. 87].
272. Wyot the Clerk appealed in the husting Richard de Blida 'seler' of
wounds and battery. He does not come, so let him be arrested and his
pledges to prosecute are in mercy, viz. Walter Wysman and John Heron
'mercer'. Richard comes now. So let the truth be ascertained by the mayor
and citizens; they say in the faith in which they are bound to the king that
he is not guilty of the wounds and beating and the parties are not agreed.
So he is quit. He was previously arrested and released to William de Blida
goldsmith, John de Paris 'seler', Ralph de Balesham 'seler', Robert de la
More 'lorimer', Richard le Paumer, 'seler', Robert Pecche 'seler', Robert de
Assendone 'seler', Richard de Strata 'seler', Richard Joce 'seler', Robert le
Chaumberlein, John de Westle and Richard de Balesham to have him here
on the first day and they did not have him. So they are all in *mercy. [cf.
579]
Nota 88. Appellum in hustengo . . . [see 273 n].
273. John le Plomer appealed in the busting Master Robert le Fizicion le
Petit and his son Robert of wounds and battery. He does not come, so let
him be arrested and his pledges to prosecute are in *mercy, viz. John
Attestrande and Henry Aspele. Robert and Robert do not come. They were
attached by Hugh de Byflete tawyer, John de Reyley tawyer, Geoffrey
Frosch 'pessoner', Richard de Bristoll, John de Derbi tawyer, Robert de
Totenham, Robert Passelewe, Gilbert le Tor, Gilbert de Pelham, Peter de
Terringg and Roger de Oxford tawyer. So they are all in mercy. Let the
truth be ascertained by the mayor and citizens; they say in the faith in which
they are bound to the king that the parties are agreed, [cf. 580]
Nota [88] Appellum in hustengo de plagis et verberatura [cf. 524 no. 88].
274. Maud la Russe appealed in the husting Alice de Kent of wounds and
battery. She does not come, so let her be arrested and her pledges to prosecute are in mercy. She has not found pledges except by faith. Alice does
not come. She was attached by John le Barbur by Neugate, Richard the
Cook of Fridaystrete, Gerard Beynin, William de Wycombe, Matthew de
Lincoln and Richard de Herwes (liberatur episcopd). (fn. 33) So they are all in
*mercy. Let the truth be ascertained by the mayor and citizens; they say
[blank], [cf. 581]
275. William de Dunhache is accused of the death of Alexander le King
killed at Retherhethe; Maurice Gorel and his wife Maud of the theft of eggs,
hens and capons; Adam de Say of stealing corn and other thefts; William
Crete of the theft of seven sheep; John son of Robert of the Bridge of stealing
a sheep and other thefts and Agnes daughter of Thomas Attehill of burning
the house of William Hithe. They come and deny the death, theft, burning
and everything and for good or ill put themselves upon the verdict of twelve
men from the neighbourhood of Retherhethe and Enefeud where the thefts
took place and this is granted to them because they are strangers. The jury
say on their oath that they are not guilty of any crime, so they are quit.
Nota 89. Forinceci acquietati per forcincecos [cf. 524 no. 89].
276. Alexander Fraunkelein is accused of the theft of a cow which belonged
to Robert Cristemeson of Northale and a horse belonging to Thomas
Hanche; Alexander de Langeley of the theft of two bushels of wheat;
Robert le Suur of Suthwerk and Agnes Atteknol of the death of Henry le
Baud; and Adam Scot of the theft of a horse. They come and deny the theft,
death and everything and for good or ill put themselves upon the neighbouring wards and the neighbourhood who say that none of them except
Alexander le Fraunkelein is guilty of any crime, so [let] Alexander [be
hanged] (suspensus) and all the others are quit. Chattels *½ mark for which
the sheriffs are to answer, [cf. 582]
277. Stephen de Burton and William de Norfolk, approvers, come and
withdraw from their appeal and confess that they are thieves. So [let them
be hanged] (suspensi). No chattels.
278. Philip le Taillur accused of robbery of and receiving of horses belonging to John de Grey and William le Latimer, comes and denies that he was
involved in the robbery, but freely admits that he had one of the horses in
his keeping for the use of John and that he afterwards returned it to John
and gave him satisfaction for it, as appears from a letter written in John's
name which Philip produces and which fully testifies to this. He puts himself upon the verdict of the mayor and aldermen that he was not involved
in the robbery and never committed or caused to be committed any trespass,
damage, trouble, loss or grievance against John or William or any of their
household. The mayor and aldermen say on the oath which they made to
the king and in the faith in which they are bound to him that Philip is in no
way guilty and that the horse did not come into his hands of his own
volition, so he is quit. [cf. 146, 287–8]
Nota 90. Acquietatus per maiorem et aldermannos [cf. 524 no. 90].
279. The jurors of the hundred of Edelmeton presented before the itinerant
justices in Middlesex in 2 Edward I [1273–4] that Adam servant of Henry de
Eure and Geoffrey servant of Stephen de Ponte killed Geoffrey Swomld in
the vill of Enefeud in the time of King Henry when they were both living in
the City with their masters Henry and Stephen; the sheriff of London was
therefore ordered to arrest both masters and servants. So Henry and
Stephen were arrested for the harbouring of Adam and Geoffrey and
appeared before the justices in Middlesex. Thereupon the mayor and citizens of London came and said that they were of the liberty of the City and
were not bound to answer there outside it and they claimed them for their
liberty. So they were allowed by the justices to find pledges until the coming
of the justices here. Henry and Stephen come, but because the incident
occurred in the time of King Henry and the justices do not wish to proceed
in this case without consulting the present king, it is adjudged that they
should find pledges to stand to right at the king's will. They found pledges,
viz. Edmund Horn, Nicholas Horn, John Lorenz, Henry Bole, Henry de
Greneford, Thomas the Goldsmith of the Bridge, Walter le Blund, Robert
de Garscherch, Robert le Burser, Gilbert de Colecestre 'taverner', Stephen
Pikeman and John Jovene, but because Stephen did not appear on the first
day the pledges who mainperned him before the itinerant justices in Middlesex are in *mercy, viz. William de Storteford 'gaunter', Edmund Horn
'feroun', Roger de Ponte 'feroun', William Amis 'pessoner', Aylwin de
Ponte 'feroun', William de Essex 'cornur', John de Depe, Bartholomew de
Capella 'gaunter', John Hurel 'feroun', Miles de Oysterhull, Daniel de
Ponte 'gaunter' and Herman le Estreis. [cf. 583]
Nota 91. De civibus dismissis per manucapcionem, qui attachiatifuerunl coram justiciariis
itinerantibus in comitatu Midd' pro morte hominis [cf. 524 no. 91].
280. Richard Attehale and his brother Walter were accused of burning
down the house of John de Bow of Totenhale. Thereupon they were arrested
during the last eyre of Middlesex and the mayor and citizens of London
appeared before the itinerant justices and said that Richard and Walter were
of the liberty of the City of London and were not bound to answer on any
account outside the liberty. So they were released by the justices to the
mayor and citizens to have them here. Richard and Walter do not come
and the mayor and citizens, asked what became of them, say they were
handed over to Walter de Saumford then sheriff of Middlesex, (fn. 38) who does
not answer for them now, so to judgment on Walter [de Saumford] for the
escapes. Richard and Walter [his brother] have now absconded, [cf. 588]
Nota 92. De civibus London' liberatis maiori et civibus per plegios (? licet) factum esset
forincecum [cf. 524 no. 92].
281. Osbert le Furbur accused of the death of his wife Beatrice comes and
denies the death and everything and for good or ill puts himself upon the
verdict of the mayor and aldermen. Because he is a stranger and not of the
liberty of the City this is granted to him. They say in the faith in which they
are bound to the king that he is not guilty, so he is quit.
282. James de Stoke clerk, accused of breaking open a box in the church
of St. Paul's London, comes and denies the theft and everything. He says
he is a clerk and is not bound to answer here. Thereupon Richard de
Herewes comes and claims him as a clerk by letters of the bishop of London
testifying that the bishop entrusted to him his authority to claim clergy. So
he is handed over to him, but so that it may be known for what he is to be
handed over, let the truth be ascertained by the mayor and aldermen; they
say in the faith in which they are bound to the king that he is not guilty, so
he is quit and as such let him be handed over to the bishop.
Nota 92 [sic; no text; cf. 524 no. 92].
283. In the year 4 Edward I [1275–6], Gregory de Rokesle being chamberlain and John Horn and Ralph le Blunt sheriffs; Roger de Farenbergh took
sanctuary in the church of St. Thomas on London Bridge, confessed that
he was a thief and abjured the realm before the chamberlain and sheriffs.
No chattels.
284. Adam Scot is accused of the theft of a horse; Thomas son of William
Mus of Norhamton and Isabel de Norhamton of the theft of a silver goblet
(cipho); Henry Fraunkelein of harbouring thieves; Thomas [Shap] (fn. †) of the
theft of a silver goblet; Edith de Brichull of clipping coins; Henry de
Lynnhull (fn. 41) of Staffordshire was arrested with three surcoats of burel (burello)
stolen from a (? suit); Thomas de (? Gandone) is accused of the death of
Ralph Testard; John Bonvalet of many thefts; and Denise Lovecote of
harbouring Hugh de Caldewell approver. (fn. 42) They come and deny the theft,
death, harbouring and everything and for good or ill put themselves upon
the verdict of the aldermen and neighbourhood; who say on the oath they
made to the king and in the faith in which they are bound to him that none
of them is guilty of any crime except Henry de Lynnhill and John Bonvalet.
So let Henry and John be [hanged] and the others are quit. Henry's chattels
5s. and John no chattels. Afterwards the mayor and aldermen testify that
Denise Lovecote was previously arrested and released to Edmund [Pecok], (fn. †)
Walter [le Poleter], (fn. †) William Slich, William de Hertford goldsmith, William
de Wautham 'corder', Geoffrey le Feverer, [John] (fn. †) Tanur, Nicholas le
Chandeler, Walter Chubbe, Gamelin Canon and John le Seriaunt (fn. 43) to have
her here on the first day and they did not have her. So they are in mercy, [cf.
584–5]
285. [m. 15] Richard le Vineter of la Bernette, accused of cutting off the
hand of Walter le Hewe near la Bernette in Middlesex so that he died,
comes and denies the death and everything and for good or ill puts himself
upon the verdict of twelve jurors from the neighbourhood of la Bernette
where the incident occurred. They say on their oath that he is not guilty, so
he is quit.
286. Holdin le Taillur was accused of harbouring thieves, so the bailiffs of
the City went to arrest him. He at once fled and absconded and has now
returned and been arrested. He comes and denies the harbouring and everything and for good or ill puts himself upon the verdict of the aldermen and
neighbourhood who say in the faith in which they are bound to the king
that he is not guilty; so he is quit, but he previously fled, so his chattels are
to be confiscated for the flight. Chattels *20s. for which Luke de
Batencurt and Henry de Frouwyk are to answer, [cf. 586]
287. Ives le Longe 'draper', William le Flaoner, Robert le Stor, Adam de
Ismongerelane, Richard de Assewy 'brokur', Nicholas de Brente and John
de Coventre are accused of robbery of horses belonging to John de Grey
and to the king at Cornhulle and robbery committed in Jewry in 47 Henry
III [1262–3]. They come and deny the robbery and everything and for good
or ill put themselves upon the verdict of the aldermen and neighbourhood,
who say in the faith in which they are bound to the king that they are not
guilty of any crime except in time of war (nisi tempore guerre). So they are
quit as regards life and limb, but are to be committed to *gaol. Afterwards
William le Flaoner came and makes fine of *40s, on the pledges of Robert
de Norwich and Thomas le Flaoner. (fn. 45) [cf. 587,146, 278, 288]
Nota 94 [also apposed to 286 and 288–9 but without text]. De quibusdam rettatis de
felonia et acquietatis. Acquietati per veredictum aldermannorum et visneti. (fn. 1)
288. Philip le Bret, Richard le Vilein, William de Blye, Stephen de Goteley,
Roger le Avener, John le Staumpeur, Richard Dragon, Osbert le Poleter,
Henry le Rous, Roger le Chaundeler, Michael le Oynter, Reginald Pointel,
John de Elilaund, Martin le Bokeler, Ranulf Lure, Robert de Waldegrave,
William de Manhale, Thomas de Estchep, William Egrith and Nicholas le
Convers are accused of robbery of horses belonging to John de Grey and
to the king at Cornhull and of robbery committed in Jewry in 47 Henry III
[1262–3] and other robberies in time of peace; they come and deny the
robbery and everything and for good or ill put themselves upon the verdict
of the aldermen and neighbourhood, who say in the faith in which they are
bound to the king that they are not guilty of any crime, so they are quit.
289. It is established by the verdict of the mayor and aldermen upon which
Henry de Coventre put himself that at the time when he was sheriff he
arrested Nicholas de Staunford, who was accused of the theft of money and
goods from Ralph le Butiller clerk and Richard de Staunford, and afterwards committed him to William le Bowyer and Guillot servant of Richard
de Lamenes, who allowed him to go free. To judgment on Henry, William
and Guillot for the escape. Henry, asked if he harboured William and
Guillot after the event and if any goods seized with Nicholas remained in
his keeping, says no, and puts himself upon the verdict of the mayor and
aldermen who say in the faith in which they are bound to the king that
Nicholas had no chattels in his house, nor did any remain with him, but in
truth they say that Henry harboured Guillot in his house for some time after
the event, so to judgment for the harbouring, [cf. 589]
290. Of Stephen de Edeworthe concerning the chattels of Robert Pointell
40s. (Bedford), [cf. 125, 590]
291. Charter of Guy de Brusseles to Philip le Taillur.
'I Guy de Brusseles son and heir of Walter de Brusseles formerly citizen of
London have given to Philip le Taillur citizen of the same all the lands and
tenements with appurtenances which fell to me by inheritance on the death
of my father Walter in the parish of St. Nicholas Shambles London in St.
Nicholas and Pentecostelanes, together with 50s. annual quit rent in the
same parish, namely 40s. from the tenement held by John King and 10s.
from the tenement held by Denis de Benchesham, viz. whatever he holds or
ought to hold in the parish, in lands, buildings of wood and stone, rents,
etc., except the tenement held by Walter Carbonel in Pentecostelane, for the
annual rent of a clove payable at Easter and the service due to the chief
lords of the fee. I Guy and my heirs and assigns warrant the same in
perpetuity to Philip his heirs and successors against all men and women,
Christians and Jews; for which gift, grant, warranty, quittance and in confirmation of the charter Philip has given me £100 as gersum. Witnesses:
Gregory de Roqele, mayor of London.' He granted further that the alderman of the place might take the aforesaid tenements into the king's hand.
292. The following have sold wines contrary to the assize: Walter de
England, Henry de Coventre, Ellis de Conducto [sic], Gilbert de Duntone,
John de Staunford, Ralph de Suffolk, Henry de St. Osyth, Alan de Suffolk,
John Hardel, Richard de St. Botolph, Robert the Scot, Richard de Kyngestone, John de Cestrehunte, Osbert de Suffolk, John le Taillur, Peter de
Gysors, Thomas de Coumbe, Simon de Farnham, Bruin de Gysorc,
Reginald de Suffolk, Emma la Barbere, Christine Renerii, John Stacy,
Eustace le Taverner, Nicholas de Westone, Rustikel Thedald, Joce the
king's purveyor (emptor regis), William Warage, John son of Saer, William
de la Cornere, William de Portesmuth, William Hewe, James the Taverner,
John Fuatard taverner, Reginald le Chaundeler, Adam Neverathom,
Robert de Reding, Henry de Hereford, Roger de Coventre, John de Depe,
William de Beille, Thomas de Conductu the elder, John Wade, Richard
Deusour, Richard de la Bernette, Richard Bole, John de Northwode, John
Doget, Hubelin de Arraz, Robert le Treyer, John Hache, Adam de Blakeny,
Thomas de Carron, Wolmar de Essex, William Doget, Richard Cortois,
Simon de Seint Liz, Thomas le Barber, Robert de Fridaiestrate, Richard de
Neuwerk, Andrew le Bell, Ellen de Flete, Agnes de Wylehale, Thomas de
Conductu the younger, Fulk the Taverner, James de Treys, Reginald de
Lauvare, Arnold de Depe, Adam le Feroun, Eleanor de Conductu, Richard
de Bedeford, Robert Russel, Roger Piggesflesh, Roger le Estmor, John
Skyp, Robert de Suffolk, John de Wodeham, Roger de Garschirche,
Bartholomew de Capella 'gaunter', Beatrice de Hakeford, Richard servant
of Avice Hardel, Philip le Traour, John de Brilond, Deudatus Gwillam,
Donelin Junte, William Russell and Robert de Dorset. So they are all in
*mercy. [cf. 527, 529]
293. Charter of Master Thomas of Pyvelesdon. (fn. 48)
'Edward by the grace of God; at the instance of R[obert Kilwardby] archbishop of Canterbury we have pardoned Master Thomas de Pywelesdon all
displeasure and rancour conceived against him by reason of trespasses
allegedly committed by him against our father King Henry and us and
others of our faithful subjects during the recent disturbances; and we have
admitted him to our grace and peace; he is not to be impleaded, molested
in any way or injured on account of any such trespasses on condition that
henceforth he conduct himself well and faithfully towards us and our heirs;
at Westminster, 10 May 4 Edward II [1276].' (fn. 49) So he is granted firm peace.
[Nota] 95. [No entry, cf. 524 no. 95].
294. The following have sold cloth contrary to the assize: John Adrian the
elder, John Adrian the younger, John Neuman, William de Northawe,
Anketin de Brettevill, Roger de Derbi, Reginald de Frouwyk, Robert
Camayle, Stephen de Cornhull, Robert de Linton, William Bukerell,
Reginald Canon, Walter Everard, John de Wylehale, Richard his brother,
John Cole, Peter de Edelmeton, Richard Eswy, William de Hadestok,
William of Winton', Geoffrey de Geddingges, Roger Beynin, William de
Geddingges, John de Waltham, Thomas son of Thomas the younger, John
Racolf, Thomas Bath, Robert de Arraz, John Heron 'peuerer', William de
Beck, William de Betoyne, Rusticall Thedal, Deodatus Willame, Richard
de Ewell, Robert Curteys, Ingram de Betoyne, William Heron, William le
Hurer, Roger Piggesfles, William de Boys, Richard de Abindon, Boydin de
Gaunt, Copin Trossin, John de Armenters, Thomas Beuvin, Thomas de
Reynham, John de Brylord, John de Nichole, Adam de Blakeney, Robert
de Acre of London, Richard de Arraz of Lincoln, Thomas de Melkestrete,
William de Staunford the younger, Geoffrey le Taillur by St. Martin le
Grand, Hugh le Taillur of Lincolnshire, Robert de Kydermenstre, William
de Wouburne, William de Lewes, William le Tundur, Belin Pe de Argent,
Nicholas Cauntyng, Walter Pe Dargent, Walter his son, Walter de Gowys,
Hugh Loger, Peter de Cambray, Philip de Benekuk, John his brother, Jakes
de la Barbere, Gerard de Heyrin, Nicholas de Wyrenale, Gerard le Carpenter, Cristelot Bel, Ingram Falconel, William Tuddehors, Bernard Pilate,
Baude de Sovenaunt, John Bonebroke, [Rykewin] (fn. †) de Douwai, Gerard de
Staleward, Thomas his brother, John de Plankes, Wiz de Plankes, Gerard
de Flos, Jake de Landa, Amaury de Castello, Bernard de Lyons, [Jomes] (fn. †)
Purteus, Gerard Bonfrani, Nicholas de Scaylon, Nicholas de Loberg, Terry
Baudan, John le Clerk of Sevenhaunt, Baude de Midi, Nicholas [Curte,
Gerardinus de la Vile], (fn. †) Ingram Alein, Walter Musard, Lambert de la
Potente, Alexander his son, Jakes [de Fresang, William de St. Amand], (fn. †)
Waubert de Pikete, Gamelin le Vilein, Thomas Pikete, Giles de Araz, [John
de Furfeles, Sewel] (fn. †) Pammoyle, Giles son of Baldwin son of Gerard,
Godfrey son of Odeken, Gilbert . . ., [John le Parchemener, Godfrey le
Parchenerius]. (fn. †) [cf. 663–4]