SPEECHES AND DEBATES IN THE First Session of the First Parliament OF King George I. Being the Fifth Parliament of Great Britain.
The Parliament meet.
ON the 17th of March, 1714-15, the Parliament
met at Westminster according to the writs of summons. And the King being come to the House of
Lords, and seated on the throne with the usual
solemnity, the gentleman Usher of the black rod was sent
with a message to the House of Commons, commanding their
attendance in the House of Peers; the Commons being come
thither, his Majesty's pleasure was signify'd to them by the
Lord Chancellor, that they should return to their House
and chuse their Speaker, and present him to his Majesty on
the 21st.
Mr Compton elected Speaker.
The Commons being return'd to their House, the Earl
of Hertford, son to the Duke of Somerset, propos'd the
honourable (fn. 1) Mr Spencer Compton, knight of the shire for
Sussex, for Speaker, and being seconded by (fn. 2) Lord Finch,
he was elected Nem. Con.
On the 21st the King came to the House of Lords with
the usual solemnity; and the House of Commons attending,
presented the hon. Spencer Compton, Esq; for their Speaker,
whom his Majesty approv'd; after which the Lord Chan
cellor read the following Speech, deliver'd into his hands by
the King.
King's Speech.
My Lords and Gentlemen,
"This being the first opportunity that I have had of
meeting my People in Parliament, since it pleas'd
Almighty God, of his good providence, to call me to the
Throne of my ancestors, I most gladly make use of it to
thank my faithful and loving Subjects, for that zeal and
firmness that hath been shewn in defence of the Protestant
Succession, against all the open and secret practices that
have been used to defeat it: And I shall never forget the
obligations I have to those who have distinguish'd themselves upon this occasion.
"It were to be wish'd, that the unparallel'd successes of
a war, which was so wisely and chearfully supported by
this Nation, in order to procure a good Peace, had been
attended with a suitable conclusion: But it is with concern
I must tell you, that some conditions even of this Peace,
essential to the security and trade of Great Britain, are not
yet duly executed; and the performance of the whole may
be look'd upon as precarious, until we shall have form'd
defensive alliances to guaranty the present treaties.
"The Pretender, who still resides in Lorrain, threatens to
disturb us, and boasts of the assistance which he still expects
here to repair his former disappointments.
"A great part of our trade is render'd impracticable; this,
if not retriev'd, must destroy our manufactures, and ruin
our navigation.
"The publick debts are very great, and surprizingly increas'd, even since the fatal cessation of arms. My first
care was to prevent a farther increase of these debts, by
paying off forthwith a great number of ships which had
been kept in pay, when there was no occasion for continuing such an expence.
Gentlemen of the House of Commons,
"I rely upon you for such supplies a the present circumstances of our affairs require for this year's service, and for
the support of the publick faith. The estimates shall be
laid before you, that you may consider of them; and
what you shall judge necessary for your safety, I shall think
sufficient for mine.
"I doubt not but you will concur with me in opinion, that
nothing can contribute more to the support of the credit of
the nation, than a strict observance of all Parliamentary
Engagements.
"The branches of the revenue, formerly granted for the
support of the civil Government, are so far incumber'd and
alienated, that the produce of the Funds which remain,
and have been granted to me, will fall much short of what
was at first design'd, for maintaining the honour and dignity of the Crown: And since it is my happiness (as I am
confident you think it yours) to see a Prince of Wales,
who may, in due time, succeed me on the Throne; and to
see him blessed with many children, the best and most valuable pledges of our care and concern for your prosperity;
this must occasion an expence to which the nation has not
of many years been accustom'd; but such as surely no
man will grudge; and therefore I do not doubt but you
will think of it with that affection which I have reason to
hope from you.
My Lords and Gentlemen,
"The eyes of all Europe are upon you, waiting the issue
of this first Session. Let no unhappy divisions of Parties
here at home, divert you from pursuing the common interest of your Country: Let no wicked insinuations. disquiet the minds of my Subjects. The establish'd constitution
in Church and State shall be the rule of my Government;
the happiness, ease, and prosperity of my people, shall be
the chief care of my life. Those who assist me in carrying
on these measures, I shall always esteem my best Friends;
and I doubt not but that I shall be able, with your assistance, to disappoint the designs of those who would deprive
me of that blessing, which I most value, the affections of
my People.
Mr Walpole's Motion for an Address of Thanks,
On the 23d, Mr Speaker having reported to the House the
King's Speech, Mr Robert Walpole made a speech, in which
he set forth the great happiness of these Nations by his Majesty's seasonable accession to the Crown; ran through the Mismanagements of the four last preceding years; and concluded
with a motion for an Address of Thanks to the King, conformable to the several heads of his Majesty's Speech. He was
seconded by the lord Hinchinbroke, (fn. 3) member for Huntingdon; and none but Sir William Whitlocke, member for the
University of Oxford, having rais'd any Objection against
Mr Walpole's motion, it was resolv'd,
That an Address be presented to his Majesty; and a Committee was appointed to draw it up, of which Mr Walpole
was elected Chairman; which was as follows:
The Address.
Most gracious Sovereign,
Your Majesty's most dutiful and loyal Subjects, the
Commons of Great Britain in Parliament assembled,
return your Majesty their unfeigned thanks for your most
gracious Speech from the Throne.
''Tis with inexpressible joy that we approach your Majesty, peaceably seated upon the Throne of your royal ancestors; and being throughly sensible of the many open and
secret practices that have of late years been used to defeat
the Protestant Succession, we cannot sufficiently adore the
Divine Providence, that so seasonably interposed, and saved
this Nation by your Majesty's happy accession to the
Crown.
'Your faithful Commons receive with the highest gratitude, your most gracious assurances, that the established
Constitution in Church and State, shall be the rule of your
Government; and the safety, ease, and prosperity of your
People, the chief care of your life. We are sensible of your
goodness expressed to those who have distinguish'd themselves by their zeal and firmness for the Protestant Successi
on: And as we doubt not, but the wisdom and steadiness of
your Government will unite the hearts of all your faithful
subjects in duty and affection to your sacred person, so we
most humbly beg leave to assure your Majesty, that we
not only highly resent the wicked insinuations used to disquiet the minds of your subjects, but are resolved, to the
utmost of our power, to suppress and extinguish that
evil disposition that is still at work to deprive your Majesty
of the affections of your people.
'We are sensibly touch'd, not only with the disappointment, but with the reproach brought on the Nation by
the unsuitable conclusion of a war, which was carry'd on
at so vast an expence, and was attended with such unparallell'd successes: But as that dishonour cannot in justice be
imputed to the whole Nation, so we firmly hope and believe, that thro' your Majesty's great wisdom, and the
faithful endeavours of your Commons, the reputation of
these your Kingdoms will in due time be vindicated and
restored.
'We are under astonishment to find, that any conditions of
the late peace, essential to the security and trade of Great
Britain, should not be duly executed; and that care was
not taken to form such alliances, as might have render'd
that peace not precarious. And as no care shall be wanting in your loyal Commons to enquire into these fatal Miscarriages, so we entirely rely on your Majesty's wisdom,
to enter into such alliances as you shall judge necessary to
preserve the peace of Europe; and we faithfully promise to
enable your Majesty to make good all such engagements.
'It is with just resentment we observe, that the Pretender
still resides in Lorrain, and that he has the presumption, by
declarations from thence, to stir up your Majesty's Subjects
to rebellion: But that which raises the utmost indignation
of your Commons is, that it appears therein, that his hopes
were built upon the measures that had been taken for some
time past in Great Britain. It shall be our business to trace
out those measures whereon he placed his hopes, and to
bring the authors of them to condign punishment.
'Your Commons are under the deepest concern, that a
great part of our trade is render'd impracticable, which, if
not retriev'd, must destroy our manufactures, and ruin our
navigation: But tho' we are too sensible of those fatal
consequences, we are not yet without hopes, that your
Majesty's great wisdom, by the assistance of your Commons,
may find means to extricate your People from their present
difficulties.
'The blessings derived to these Nations from your Majesty's auspicious reign, are not confined to the present times;
we have a prospect of future and lasting happiness entail'd
upon your People by a long succession of your royal progeny. And as this is a blessing which these Kingdoms have
a long time wanted, so they could never hope to have seen
it so well supply'd, as in the person of his Royal Highness
the Prince of Wales, and his issue. Your faithful Commons shall therefore think it their duty to enable your Majesty to support the dignity of the Crown, and to make an
honourable provision for the Royal Family.
'The surprizing increase of the publick debts, even since
all thoughts of carrying on the war were laid aside, shall not
discourage us from granting such supplies as shall be necessary for the service of this year, and the support of publick faith: And we do entirely concur with your Majesty
in opinion, that nothing can contribute more towards preserving the credit of the Nation, than a strict observance of
all Parliamentary Engagements, which we are firmly resolved upon all occasions inviolably to maintain.
Debate thereon.
Upon the reading of this Address, there arose a warm Debate in the House: Mr Shippen, Mr Bromley, Sir William
Wyndham, Lieutenant General Ross member for the shire
of Ross, Mr Cæsar member for Hertford, Mr Ward member for Thetford, Sir (fn. 4) Robert Raymond member for Ludlow, Sir William Whitlocke, Mr Hungerford member for
Scarbrough, and some others, raised objections against divers
expressions in the Address; but were answer'd by Mr Robert
Walpole, General (fn. 5) Stanhope member for Cockermouth,
Sir Gilbert Heathcote member for Helston, and Mr William Pulteney. General Ross, among the rest, insisted much,
'That the condemning the Peace, and censuring the late
Ministry, was a reflection on the late Queen, whose act and
deed the Peace was; and that he was sure the reflecting on
the late Queen, could not be agreeable to his present Majesty.'
He was answer'd by Mr Robert Walpole, and General Stanhope, 'That nothing was farther from their intentions, than
to asperse the late Queen; that they rather designed to vindicate her memory, by exposing and punishing those evil
Counsellors, who deluded her into pernicious measures;
whereas the opposite Party endeavoured to screen and justify
those Counsellors, by throwing on that good, pious, and
well-meaning Princess, all the blame and odium of their evil
counsels.' As to censuring the late Ministers, without hearing them, and condemning the Peace, without examining into particulars, as unjust and unprecedented, it was answer'd,
'That they must distinguish between censuring Ministers, and
condemning the Peace in general, and condemning particular
persons. That they might, in equity and justice, do the
first, because the whole Nation is already sensible, that their
honour and true interest were given up by the late Peace;
that in due time they would call them to an account, who
made and advised such a Peace; but God forbid they should
ever condemn any person unheard.' On this occasion General Stanhope took notice of a report industriously spread
abroad, 'That the present Ministers never designed to call
the late Managers to an account, but only to censure them in
general terms: But he assur'd the House, that notwithstanding all the endeavours that had been used to prevent a discovery of the late mismanagements, by conveying away several
papers from the Secretaries Offices, yet the Government had
sufficient evidence left, to prove the late Ministry the most
corrupt that ever sate at the Helm: That those matters
would soon be laid before the House; and that it would appear, that a certain English General had acted in concert
with, if not received orders from, Marshal Villars.'
Sir William Wyndham endeavoured to prove, that the
Peace had been very beneficial to this Kingdom; and offered
to produce a list of goods, by which it appear'd, that the Customs had increased near 100,000 l. per annum. But he was
immediately taken up by Sir Gilbert Heathcote, who readily own'd, Sir William might, indeed, produce a list of vast
imports from France, but defy'd him to shew that our exports
thither, particularly of our woollen manufactures, had encreas'd since the Peace. He added, that imports being only
our consumption, rather prove our loss than our gain; and
that the Nation gets only by exports, which keep up our
manufactures, employ our poor, and bring in returns in money; to which Sir William Wyndham made no reply. Sir
William Whitlocke having suggested, that the new Ministry
design'd to involve the Nation in a new war, and lay six shillings in the pound, was assur'd by Mr Robert Walpole, that
none in the present Ministry were for a war, if the same
could any ways be avoided; and that he doubted not, but
Two Shillings in the Pound would be sufficient towards this
year's service.
The Address resolv'd on.
After this Debate, a motion being made, and the question
put, that the Address of Thanks be recommitted, it pass'd in
the negative, by 244 voices against 138; and then it was resolv'd, That the House do agree with the Committee in the
said Address; and order'd, that such Members as are of the
Privy Council, should know his Majesty's pleasure, when he
would be attended by the House. The King having appointed the next day, the Commons, with their Speaker, attended his Majesty accordingly at St James's, with their
Address, to which his Majesty return'd the following Answer:
The King's Answer thereto.
Gentlemen,
"I Thank you for the many kind assurances you have given me in your dutiful and loyal Address.
"No endeavours shall be wanting on my part, to promote
your true interest, and endear myself to all my People:
And I will depend on your zeal and affection, to defeat
all evil designs, that may tend to disquiet the minds of
my People, and disturb the tranquility of my Government.
Exceptions made to some Passages in his Majesty's Proclamation for calling this Parliament, by Sir W. Whitlocke.
April 5th, the House being mov'd to appoint a day for
taking into consideration the King's Proclamation of the 15th
of January last for calling a new Parliament, and the same
being read accordingly, Sir William Whitlocke made some
exceptions to the said Proclamation, as unprecedented and unwarrantable, for which he was call'd upon by some members
to explain himself; upon which he made a kind of excuse for
what he had said.
The passages here suppos'd to be alluded to are as follows,
viz. We cannot omit, on this occasion of first summoning our
Parliament of Great Britain, in justice to ourselves, and that
the miscarriages of others may not be imputed to us, at a time
when false impressions may do the greatest and irrecoverable hurt
before they can be clear'd up, to signify to our whole Kingdom,
that we were very much concern'd, on our accession to the Crown,
to find the publick affairs of our Kingdoms under the greatest difficulties, as well in respect of our trade, and the interruption of
our navigation, as of the great debts of the Nation, which we
were surpriz'd to observe, had been very much increas d since the
conclusion of the last war: We do not therefore doubt, that if the
ensuing Elections shall be made by our loving Subjects with that
safety and freedom which by law they are entitled to, and we are
firmly resolv'd to maintain to them, they will send up to Parliament the fittest persons to redress the present disorders, and to provide for the peace and happiness of our Kingdoms, and the case
of our people for the future, and therein will have a particular
regard to such as shew'd a firmness to the Protestant Succession,
when it was most in danger, &c.
And by Sir William Wyndham. ; Motion for committing him to the Tower. ; It is oppos'd by Mr R. Walpole ; Sir W. Wyndham order'd to be reprimanded by the Speaker.
This Dispute would have been drop'd, had not Sir William
Wyndham took up the cudgels, and even carry'd the matter
farther, by advancing, that the said Proclamation was not
only unprecedented and unwarrantable, but even of dangerous consequence to the very being of Parliaments. The
Courtiers could not but take notice of so home a reflection,
and thereupon call'd upon Sir William Wyndham to justify
his charge; but Sir William, who judg'd he could not descend
to particulars, without giving farther offence, declin'd explaining himself; tho' at the same time, he resolutely maintain'd
his first assertion, saying, 'That as he thought some expressions in the said Proclamation of dangerous consequence, so
he believ'd every Member was free to speak his thoughts.' He
was answer'd, 'No doubt but every Member has that liberty,
freedom of speech being one of the essential privileges of that
House; but that the House has, at the same time, both the
liberty and power to censure and punish such Members as
transgress the rules of decency, trespass upon the respect due
to the Crown, and so abuse the privilege of the House within
doors, as to render it contemptible without.' Sir William being again call'd upon to explain himself, and still persisting in
his refusal, some Members cry'd the Tower, the Tower; but
Mr Robert Walpole warded off the blow by words to the following purpose. Mr. Speaker, 'I am not for gratifying the
desire which the Member, who occasions this great debate,
shews of being sent to the Tower; 'twould make him too considerable: But as he is a young Man of good parts, who sets
up for a warm Champion of the late Ministry, and one who
was in all their secrets, I would have him be in the House
when we come to enquire into the conduct of his friends, both
that he may have an opportunity to defend them, and be a
witness of the fairness with which we shall proceed against
those Gentlemen; and that it may not be said, that we take
any advantage against them.' After several other speeches,
which prolong'd this debate from one till half an hour past
five in the afternoon, a motion was made, and the question
put, that the House do now adjourn, which being carry'd in
the negative by a majority of 212 voices against 134, a motion was made, and the question propos'd, that Sir William
Wyndham having reflected upon his Majesty's Proclamation
of the 15th of January last for calling a new Parliament, and
having refus'd to justify his charge, although often call'd upon
so to do, is guilty of a great indignity to his Majesty, and of
a breach of the privilege of the House.' This motion occasion'd a fresh Debate, that lasted till seven of the clock; the
Courtiers still insisting, that Sir William Wyndham should
justify his charge, and Sir William as resolutely declining to
do it, saying, he was ready to undergo whatever a majority
might think fit to inflict upon him. At last the question being
put that Sir William Wyndham should withdraw, the same
was carry'd in the affirmative by 208 Voices against 129,
whereupon Sir William withdrew accordingly; and with him,
to a man, all the 129 Members who had been for the negative. Their antagonists being thus entire masters of the field,
the question was put, and unanimously resolv'd; that Sir William Wyndham, having reflected upon his Majesty's Proclamation of the 15th of January last for calling a new Parliament, and having refus'd to justify his charge, although often
call'd upon so to do; is guilty of a great indignity to his Majesty, and of a breach of the privilege of the House: after
which, it was order'd, that Sir William Wyndham be, for
the said offence, reprimanded in his place by Mr. Speaker:
and that he should attend the House in his place the next
morning.
Sir William Wyndham attending the next day in his place,
Mr. Speaker address'd himself to him in this manner.
SIR,
The arraigning a Proclamation issued by his Majesty
for calling this present Parliament; and refusing to assign any Cause why such Proclamation is blameable; the House
thought an Indignity to his Majesty, and so unwarrantable an
use of that Freedom of Speech (which is the undoubted Privilege of Parliament) that the House thought they could not
let it pass without Animadversion. But being willing their
Moderation should appear, not withstanding their Lerity has
been too much despised and contemned, they have inflicted the
mildest Censure your Offence was capable of, and have commanded me to reprimand you in your Place; and in Obedience to their Command, I do reprimand you accordingly.
Whereupon Sir William Wyndham said:
Mr. Speaker,
I Very truly return my Thanks to you for performing that duty which is incumbent upon you from your
office, in so candid and gentleman-like a manner.
'As I am a Member, I know I must acquiesee in the
determination of the House. But as I am not conscious
to my self of having offered any indignity to his Majesty, or of having been guilty of any breach of the privilege of this House; I have no thanks to return to those
Gentlemen, who, under a pretence of lenity, have brought
me under this censure.'
Gen. Stanhope's Motion for appointing a Committee, to inquire into the late Peace, and the Management of the late Queen's Ministry.
April 9. General Stanhope presented to the House, pursuant to their Address to his Majesty for that purpose on the
31st of March, all the powers, instructions, memorials, papers, &c. relating to the late negotiation of peace and commerce, and to the cessation of arms, which he delivered in
at the table, and told the House, 'That nothing had been
omitted, that might either answer the desire they had express'd of being throughly inform'd of what had pass'd in
those important negotiations, or to satisfy the whole World,
that the present Ministry acted with the utmost fairness and
candour, and design'd to take no manner of advantage over
the late Managers in the intended inquiries: That, indeed,
the papers now laid before the House were only copies, but
that the originals would be produc'd if occasion requir'd:
Concluding, That those papers being too many, and too voluminous to be perus'd and examin'd by all the Members of
the House, he thought it more convenient, and therefore
mov'd, that the said books and papers be referred to a select
Committee of twenty persons, who should digest the substance of them under proper heads, and report the same,
with their observations thereupon to the House.' Mr. Ward
Member for Thetford, said, 'Nothing could be fairer. That
for his own part, tho' his principle was that Kings can do no
wrong, yet he was of opinion, that Ministers were accountable for their male-administration.'
Mr. E. Harley's Defence of the Earl of Oxford. ; A secret Committee of 21 Members appointed.
Mr. Edward Harley, (fn. 6) Member for Leominster, on this
stood up, and said, 'That it was easy to see that one of his
nearest Relations was principally aim'd at, in the intended
inquiries; but he might assure the House, that the said person,
notwithstanding the various reports which had been spread
concerning him, would neither fly his Country, nor conceal
himself, but be forth-coming whenever he should be call'd
upon to justify his conduct. That he hoped he would be able,
upon the severest trial, to make his innocence appear to all
the World; but if he should be so unhappy as to have been
guilty of the crimes that were laid to his charge, he would
think all his blood too small a sacrifice to atone for them.'
Nobody oppos'd General Stanhope's motion: Mr. Hungerford only excepted against the number of twenty, and moved
that one more might be added; which was agreed to, and it
was resolved, That the papers before-mentioned be referr'd
to a Committee of twenty one. That the said Committee
be a Committee of Secrecy; that they be chosen by way of balloting: And, That the Members of the House should on the
monday following prepare lists for that purpose, &c.
April 13, Colonel Bladen (fn. 7) , member for Stockbridge,
reported from the Committee, that the Majority had fallen
upon the one and twenty Persons following, viz. Sir Richard
Onslow, Bart. (fn. 8) member for Surry; Mr R. Walpole (fn. 9) ;
Mr Cowper (fn. 10) , member for Truro; General Stanhope (fn. 11) ;
Mr Boscawen (fn. 12) , member for Penryn; Mr W. Pulteney (fn. 13) ,
member for Heydon; Mr Lechmere (fn. 14) , member for Cockermouth; Daniel lord Finch (fn. 15) , member for Rutlandshire;
Mr John Aislabie (fn. 16) , member for Ripon; Mr Vernon,
member for Worcestershire; the Earl of Hertford (fn. 17) , member for Northumberland; Mr Edward Wortley Montague,
member for Westminster; Sir David Dalrymple, Bart. (fn. 18) member for Haddington, &c. Mr George Bailie (fn. 19) , member for
Berwickshire; Sir Joseph Jekyll (fn. 20) , member for Lymington; Lieutenant General Erle (fn. 21) , member for Wareham. ;
Mr Richard Hampden (fn. 22) , member for the County of Bucks;
Sir Robert Marsham (fn. 23) , member for Maidston; Mr Denton (fn. 24) , member for Buckingham: Mr Thomas Pitt (fn. 25) , sen.
member for Old Sarum; Lord Coningsby (fn. 26) , member for
Leominster.
An objection being made by some members to Sir Joseph
Jekyll's being one of the said Committee, he having not taken the oaths at the table; it was readily answered, that the
same was not owing to any voluntary neglect, Sir Joseph Jekyll being employed in the circuits, as Judge of the County
Palatine of Chester. Whereupon it was resolv'd, That Sir
Joseph Jekyll being a Member of this House, was capable of
being chosen of the Committee of Secrecy, altho' he had not
been sworn at the table; And it was also order'd, I. That the
books and papers order'd to remain in the custody of the
Clerk, 'till this Committee was chosen, be delivered to the
said Committee; and that they do examine the same, and
report to the House what they find material in them; and
that they, or any five of them, do meet this afternoon, and
fit de die in diem; II. That the said Committee have power to
send for persons, papers, and records.
They meet and chuse a Chairman.
The Committee of Secrecy met that evening, and chose
Mr Robert Walpole their Chairman; but that Gentleman
being the next day taken ill, the Committee chose Mr Secretary Stanhope to supply his place of Chairman, and for
dispatch sake, subdivided themselves into three Committees,
to each of which a certain number of books and papers were
allotted.
Motion relating to the Civil List. ; Debate thereon.
May 13, The Committee of the whole House having examin'd the accounts laid before them, relating to the Civil List
in the Reigns of K. Charles II. K. James II. K. William III.
and Queen Anne, and other papers on that head, the Courtiers offer'd the following question, viz. That it appears to
this Committee, 'that the sum of 700,000 l. per annum
was settled upon King William, during his life, for the
support of his Houshold, and other necessary occasions; and
at the time of his demise, after the deduction of 3700 l. a
week which was apply'd to publick uses, was the produce of
the Civil List revenues that were continued and settled upon
Queen Anne, during her life.' Which question occasion'd
a warm and long Debate. They who propos'd it had two
things principally in their view; I. To vindicate the present
Ministry from the aspersions cast upon them, and industriously
spread about, by the emissaries of the late Managers, that
the Courtiers design'd to give the King a larger revenue than
his Predecessors had enjoy'd; and, II. To make good the
branches of the revenue assigned for the support of the Civil
List, which had been alienated, or abridg'd, so that the
whole neat produce might amount to the sum of 700,000 l.
per annum.
The leading Men among the opposite Party, being sensible
of the first, and pretending, at least, to be ignorant of the
consequences of this preliminary question, insisted a long
while, 'That it was ensnaring: That what had been done
by former Parliaments ought not to be a standing rule for
the subsequent: That supposing the Parliament had given
King William a revenue of 700,000 l. per annum for the
Civil List, they ought to consider, that he was to pay out of
it 50,000 l. per annum to the late Queen, then Princess of
Denmark; 15 or 20000 l. per annum to the late Duke of
Gloucester; and 40,000 l. for the dowry of the late King
James's Queen: That after the late Queen's accession to the
Throne, the Parliament taking notice that the produce of the
Civil List revenues exceeded what they had been given for;
the sum of 3700 l. per Week, (that is 192,400 l. per annum)
was taken out of them, and apply'd to other uses; notwithstanding which deduction, the late Queen had honourably
maintain'd her Family, and supported the dignity of the
Crown: However, if the present revenues of the Civil List
were not sufficient, they were ready to consent to an addition.' The Courtiers answer'd, 'That the question before
them was founded upon facts, which, if deny'd, they were
ready to prove by the records of the House.' But Sir William Wyndham still urging that the question was ensnaring,
General Stanhope answer'd, 'That he would be very plain
with them, and own, that as 'twas notorious, that great endeavours had been used to alienate the affection of the People
from the King and his Government by false suggestions, that
they design'd to plunge the Nation into extraordinary expences, they thought it highly necessary to clear his Majesty and
his Ministers from that malicious aspersion.' To this the lord
(fn. 27) Guernsey, member for Surry, reply'd, 'That the dissaffection of the People, if any, did not proceed from his Majesty,
but from the hardships his Ministers put on the Friends of
the late Ministry.' To which it was return'd, 'That as soon
as it was made known to the world, how the late Ministry
had used the whole Nation, nothing that could be done
against them, would then be thought a hardship; but, however, that neither that noble member, nor any of his family, had reason to complain of hardships.' After some other
Speeches, which prolong'd the Debate from two 'till about
five in the afternoon, the Country Party endeavour'd to drop
the question, by moving that the Speaker resume the Chair;
but the question being put upon this question, the same was
carried in the negative by 244 Voices against 148: After
which, the first question was put, and carry'd in the affirmative by about the same majority. Then the victorious
Party mov'd, That to enable his Majesty to support the
dignity of the Crown, and to make an honourable provision
for the Royal Family, there be granted to his Majesty, during his life, an additional revenue, which, together with the
neat produce of the Civil List branches, may make up the
clear yearly sum of 700,000 l. for the service of his Majesty's
Houshold and Family, and for his other necessary expences
and occasions.' The question being put upon this motion,
the same occasion'd another great Debate. Sir Thomas Hanmer, Mr Bromley, Sir William Wyndham, Mr Cæsar, Mr
Hungerford, and some other leading Members of the late
Ministry, who, on this occasion, were strengthen'd and back'd
by some eminent Members of the Court Party, did not at
first directly oppose the question, but insinuated, 'That before they came to that resolution, it should be proper that
a particular of the King's expences should be laid before the
House.' Mr Walpole, General Stanhope, Mr Lechmere, and
some other Courtiers, who, on this occasion, were join'd by
some of the opposite Party, having exploded that proposal as
altogether inconsistent with the King's honour, to have all the
private expences of his Family and Houshold look'd into, as
if he had need of a Guardian, the Country Party then
mov'd, that the sum of 600,000 l. per annum be given to
his Majesty, and 100,000 l. per annum settled on the Prince
of Wales. The Courtiers perceiving that the proposal of
giving the Prince of Wales a separate revenue, was only a
design to divide the Royal Family, by lessening the next
Heir Apparent's dependence on the King, oppos'd it with
great warmth; and the question being put upon that motion, the same was carry'd in the negative by a great
majority. The Country Party having lost these two points,
some of that Party more openly oppos'd the main question,
among the rest, Sir William Wyndham said, 'He had the
honour to serve Queen Anne, and had the opportunity to
look both into her revenue and expences; and he could assure the House, that about 500,000 l. per annum, were
sufficient for the support of her Family and Civil List; tho'
she reserv'd about 50,000 l. a year for the late King James's
Consort.' The Courtiers were glad of this last confession;
and General Stanhope desir'd the Committee to take Notice
of what that Gentleman had advanc'd, because it would
serve to confirm some matters, which the Committee of Secrecy had found in the papers that were laid before them.
A Courtier, who, at that time, spoke on the opposite side,
made some reflections on the present unthrifty administration
of his Majesty's revenue; and, in particular, took notice of
the salaries of the Judges being advanc'd; not, said he, for
services done, but expected. Upon the whole matter, the
question being put upon the motion before mention'd, about
seven o'clock in the evening, the same was carry'd in the
affirmative without dividing.
Motion for an Address to the King, to retrench Pensions, &c. ; Mr Robert Walpole's Speech.
May 18. The Commons resolved themselves into a Committee of the whole House, to consider of the several lists
and accounts of annuities, pensions, and bounties granted by
the late Queen, or his present Majesty; upon which there
arose a warm Debate. The leading Men among the Friends
of the late Ministry, supported again by a great many Courtiers, exclaim'd against the pensions given by the Crown to
several persons of quality, some of whom they nam'd who
had no occasion for them; and a motion was made, that an
Address be presented to his Majesty, that he would be pleas'd
to retrench all unnecessary pensions, and grant no more any
such for the future. Hereupon Mr R. Walpole shew'd,
'That they ought not to stint the King's benesicence, nor
debar his Majesty from the exercise of the most glorious
branch of his royal prerogative, which is to bestow his favours on such as distinguish themselves in his service.' He
was seconded by Mr Hampden, who, on the other hand,
observ'd, that all the pensions about which so much noise
was made, did not amount to above 25000 l. a year; and
to wave the motion made by the Country Party, he mov'd,
that the Chairman should leave the Chair; which, being put
to the vote, pass'd in the affirmative, by 191 votes against
188; so that the Court Party carry'd it by three voices only.
700,000 l. per Annum granted to the King for his Household, &c.
May 23. The Commons, in a grand Committee on the
Supply, came to this resolution, viz. That to enable his Majesty to support the dignity of the Crown, and to make an
honourable provision for the Royal Family, there be granted
to his Majesty, during his life, an additional revenue of
120000 l. per annum; which, together with the neat produce of the Civil List branches, may make up the clear yearly
sum of 700000 l. for the service of his Majesty's Houshold
and Family, and other his necessary expences and occasions.
This resolution was May 24 reported, and agreed to by the
House.
Motion on the Bill for regulating the Forces, &c.
June 1. The Lords having sent to the Commons, the Bill
for the better regulating the Forces, &c. and the amendments
to the Bill by the Lords being read, a motion was made,
that the farther consideration of those amendments be adjourn'd, which was carry'd in the negative; and then those
amendments being read a second time, were agreed to by the
House. (fn. 28) Mr Shippen, member for Newton in Lancashire,
having, on this occasion, reflected on the administration, as
if they design'd to set up a standing army, and insinuated,
as if, after all the great clamour that had been rais'd, their
secret Committee would end in smoke; he was taken up by
Mr Boscawen, who said, 'He could not forbear taking
notice of the insolence of a certain set of men, who having
committed the blackest crimes, had yet the assurance to dare
the justice of the Nation; but he hoped those crimes would
not long remain unpunish'd: That the Committee of Secrecy were ready to make their Report; and had directed their
Chairman to move the House the very next day, that a day
might be appointed for receiving the said Report; and that,
in the mean time, he might venture to assure the House,
that they had found sufficient matter to impeach of High
Treason several Lords and some Commoners.' Mr R. Walpole said, 'That he wanted words to express the villany of
the last Frenchify'd Ministry;' and General Stanhope added,
'he wonder'd, that men who were guilty of such enormous
crimes, had still the audaciousness to appear in the publick
streets.'
Mr Walpole's Motion for receiving the Secret Committee's Report.
June 2, Mr Robert Walpole acquainted the House from
the Committee of Secrecy, 'That they had examined the
Books, &c. referred to them, and had matters of the greatest
importance to lay before the House; and that the Committee
had directed him to move the House, that a day might be appointed for receiving their Report.' Upon which, after a
small Debate, it was order'd, that the said Report be receiv'd
upon that day sev'nnight; and that all the Members do attend
at that Time, upon pain of incurring the highest displeasure
of the House.
The House adjourns.
June 3. The King came to the House of Peers, and gave
the royal assent to the Malt-Bill and the Mutiny-Bill, and
his Majesty being gone, the Commons return'd to their
House, and order'd, that the Committee of Secrecy should
have leave to sit during the adjournment of the House, who
then adjourn'd 'till the 8th of June, by reason of the Whitsuntide Holidays.
Mr Walpole's Motion for apprehending such Persons as should be nam'd by the Chairman of the Secret Committee.
June 9, Mr Robert Walpole, from the Committee of
Secrecy, acquainted the House, 'That he had a Report to present; (according to their order) but that he had
the commands of the Committee to make a motion to the
House before he read the Report; that there are in the Report matters of the highest importance: That although the
Committee had power to send for persons, papers, and records, they did not think fit to make use thereof, believing
it to be necessary, in order to bring offenders to justice, that
some persons should be secur'd, before 'tis possible they should
know what they are to be examin'd to; and left they should
have notice from what should be read in the Report, to make
their escape, he was commanded by the Committee, according to former precedents, to move, that a warrant may
be issued by Mr Speaker, to apprehend certain persons who
shall be nam'd to him by the Chairman of the said Committee; and that no Members may be permitted to go out
of the House.
Hereupon it was order'd, I. That the Lobby be clear'd
of all strangers, and the back-doors of the Speaker's chamber be lock'd up, and the key brought and laid upon the
table; and that the Serjeant do stand at the door of the
House, and suffer no Member to go forth. II. That Mr
Speaker do issue his Warrant to the Serjeant at Arms attending the House, to take into his Custody such Persons as
shall be nam'd to Mr Speaker by the Chairman of the Committee of Secrecy, in order to their being examined before
the said Committee.
Hereupon Mr Speaker issued out his Warrant to the Serjeant at Arms, to take into his Custody several Persons that
were nam'd to him by Mr Walpole, particularly Mr Matthew Prior, and Mr Thomas Harley, the first of whom was
immediately apprehended, and the other some Hours after.
Report from the Secret Committee presented. ; And read.
This done, Mr Walpole acquainted the House, 'That
the Committee of Secrecy had perus'd the Books and Papers
referr'd to them, and had agreed upon a Report, which they
had commanded him to make: That it was contain'd in two
Books, one of which was the Report, and the other an Appendix to it, containing at large those Letters and Papers
which were referr'd to in the Report.' And he read the
Report in his Place, and afterwards deliver'd the same in at
the Table, together with the Appendix and the Books which
were referr'd to the said Committee. The Reading of the said
Report having lasted from one till about Six in the Evening,
a Motion was made by the Friends of the late Ministry,
and the Question put, That the farther Consideration thereof
be adjourn'd 'till next Morning, but it was carry'd in the
Negative, by 282 against 171, and order'd, that the Report
be now read: And the Clerk of the House having read Part
of it, 'till half an Hour past Eight, the farther Consideration
of it was adjourn'd.
Debate thereon. ; Mr Walpole impeaches Lord Bolingbroke of High Treason, &c. ; Debate thereon. ; The Impeachment of Lord Colingbroke agreed to by the House. ; Lord Coningsby impeaches Robert Earl of Oxford of High Treason. &c. ; Debate thereon. ; The Impeachment of Robert Earl of Oxford agreed to by the House. ; Articles against Lord Bolingbroke and the Earl of Oxford order'd to be drawn up. ; The Report from the Committee of Secrecy order'd to be printed,
June 10. The Commons resum'd the adjourn'd Consideration of the Report from the Committee of Secrecy, and the
rest of the Report being read, which lasted 'till about four
in the Afternoon, Sir (fn. 29) Thomas Hanmer, Bart. Member
for Suffolk, mov'd, That the Consideration of the said Report be adjourn'd till the 21st of the same Month, and was
seconded by the leading Men among the Friends of the late
Ministry, who mov'd also, that the said Report be printed,
to be perus'd by all the Members of the House. Hereupon
Mr Robert Walpole said, 'He could not but wonder, that
those Gentlemen who had shew'd so great Impatience to have
the Report laid before the House, should now press for adjourning the Consideration of it. That as for the Committee
of Secrecy, as they had not yet gone through all the Branches of their Inquiry, they could have wish'd some longer
Time had been allow'd them to peruse and digest several important Papers. That in order to that, they would have de
ferr'd three Weeks or a Month, the laying their Report before the House; but that some Gentlemen having reflected
on the pretended Slowness of the Committee; since the said
Report was now before them, they must e'en go through
with it.' General Stanhope added, 'That for his own Part,
he would readily agree to give those Gentlemen all the Time
they could desire to consider of the Report; but that since
they themselves had precipitated this Affair, he was of Opinion, they ought to prosecute it with Vigour, lest, by stopping on a sudden, they should fortify the Notion, which the
Friends of the late Ministry had, with great Industry, propagated among the People, That the Report of the Committee of Secrecy would vanish into Smoke; the rather, because these malicious Insinuations had rais'd the Spirits and
Insolence of the Disaffected, and were the principal Cause of
the present Ferment among the giddy Multitude. That he
agreed with the Member who had mov'd for the printing
of the Report; that not only the House, but the whole
World, might be convinc'd of the Fairness and Impartiality
of their Proceedings; but that the Crimes of some Persons
nam'd in the Report were so obvious to every Body, that
they ought, in his Opinion, immediately proceed to the impeaching of them.' Some propos'd the adjourning the Debate 'till one Time, some 'till another; but the Court Party
were resolv'd against any Delays; and the Question being
put about seven in the Evening, on the Motion made by Sir
Thomas Hanmer, it was carry'd in the Negative by 280
against 160. This Point gain'd, Mr Robert Walpole said,
'He made no Question, that, after the Report had been
twice read, the whole House was fully convinc'd, that Henry
Lord Viscount Bolingbroke was guilty of High Treason, and
other High Crimes and Misdemeanours: That therefore he
impeach'd him of those Crimes; but if any Member had any
Thing to say in his Behalf, he doubted not but the House
was ready to hear him.' After a deep Silence in the House
for some Minutes, Mr Hungerford rose up and said, 'That,
in his Opinion, nothing was mention'd in the Report, in Relation to the Lord Bolingbroke, that amounted to High
Treason.' And General Ross said, 'He wonder'd no Body
spoke in Favour of the Lord Bolingbroke: That, for his
own Part, he had nothing to say at present; but reserv'd to
himself to speak in a properer Time.' The Resolution for
impeaching the Lord Bolingbroke of High Treason and
other High Crimes and Misdemeanours, being pass'd, the
Lord Coningsby stood up, and said, 'The worthy Chairman
of the Committee has impeach'd the Hand, but I do impeach the Head; he has impeach'd the Clerk, and I the
Justice; he has impeach'd the Scholar, and I the Master:'
so impeach'd Robert Earl of Oxford and Earl Mortimer, of
High Treason, and other High Crimes and Misdemeanours.
Hereupon Mr (fn. 30) Harley made a long pathetick Speech;
wherein he endeavour'd to justify his Brother, the Earl of
Oxford, 'as having done nothing but by the immediate
Commands of the late Queen; urging, 'that the Peace was
a good one, and approv'd as such by two Parliaments: Concluding, that the Facts mention'd in the Report, and which
were charg'd on the Earl, could not be construed to amount
to High Treason, but only, in strict Rigour, to Misdemeanours.' He was back'd by Mr (fn. 30) Thomas Foley, Member
for Hereford, the Earl's Brother-in-Law, who complain'd of
the Hardship put upon that Nobleman, in charging him
with High Treason, before they had examined the Report:
But what was yet more favourable for the Earl, was spoke
by Sir Joseph Jekyll, one of the Committee of Secrecy,
who said, 'That as to the Lord Bolingbroke, they had more
than sufficient Evidence to convict him of High Treason, upon the Statute 25 Edward III. but that as to the Earl of
Oxford, he doubted whether they had either sufficient Matter, or Evidence to impeach him of Treason.' But another
Member of the Committee of Secrecy having assur'd the
House, That besides what had appear'd before them, and
was mention'd in the Report, they had other Evidence, viva
Voce: It was resolv'd, without a Division, That this House
will impeach Robert Earl of Oxford, and Earl Mortimer, of
High Treason, and other High Crimes and Misdemeanours:
And order'd, that it be referr'd to the Committee of Secrecy, to draw up Articles of Impeachment, and prepare Evidence against Henry Viscount Bolingbroke, and Robert Earl
of Oxford and Earl Mortimer. After this, it was order'd
likewise, that the farther Consideration of the said Report
be adjourn'd; and that the said Report, with the Appendix,
be printed.
And sent to the Sheriffs, &c.
June 11. The Commons order'd the Speaker to send a
printed Copy of the Report from the Committee of Secrecy
to the Sheriff of every County, and to the returning Officer
of every City and Borough sending Members to Parliament.
June 15. Mr Walpole, from the Committee of Secrecy,
acquainted the House, That he was directed by the Committee to move the House, That the Persons taken into Custody, pursuant to the Order of the House of the 9th Inst.
might be examin'd in the most solemn Manner, according to
former Precedents. Upon which it was order'd, That
such Members of the Committee of Secrecy, who are
Justices of the Peace for the County of Middlesex, should
examine Mr Matthew Prior, and Mr Thomas Harley, at
the said Committee.
Mr Prior order'd into close Custody.
June 17. Mr Walpole acquainted the House, That pursuant to their Order, Matthew Prior, Esq; had been, the
Day before, examin'd before the Committee of Secrecy, and
during a long Examination, there appear'd Matters of such
Importance, that the Committee had directed him to move
the House, that he might be confin'd in close Custody, and
no Person permitted to come to him: Upon which it was
order'd, That Mr Matthew Prior, now in Custody of the
Serjeant at Arms, be consin'd in close Custody, and no Person permitted to come to him without Leave from Mr
Speaker.
The Account of what pass'd at Mr Prior's Examination,
as drawn up by his own Hand, may be seen in the APPENDIX to this Work.
Gen. Stanhope impeaches James Duke of Ormond of High Treason, &c. ; Debate thereon.
June 21. The House having, according to Order, consider'd farther of the Report from the Committee of Secrecy,
Gen. Stanhope stood up and said, 'He wish'd he were not
oblig'd to break Silence on that Occasion; but that as a
Member of the Secret Committee, and of that great Assembly, which ought to do the Nation Justice, he thought
it his Duty to impeach James Duke of Ormond of High
Treason, and other High Crimes and Misdemeanours;' and
was seconded by Mr Boscawen. Hereupon Mr Archibald Hut
cheson, (fn. 31) Member for Hastings, made a long Speech in behalf of the Duke of Ormond, wherein he set forth, 'his
noble Birth and Qualifications; and the great Services which
both he and his illustrious Ancestors had perform'd to the
Crown and Nation; urg'd, That in the whole Course of his
late Conduct, he had but obey'd the late Queen's Commands;
and concluded, That if all that was alledg'd against his
Grace in the Report could be made out, it would, in the
Rigour of the Law, amount to no more than High Misdemeanours.' This Speech made a great Impression on the
Assembly; and Mr Hutcheson was seconded by General
Lumley, Member for Arundel, who said, among other
Things, 'That the Duke of Ormond had, on all Occasions,
given signal Proofs both of his Affection and Love for his
Country, and of his personal Bravery and Courage, particularly at the Battle of Landen, where he was wounded and
taken Prisoner; and that the late King William was extremely satisfy'd with his Grace's gallant Behaviour. That
his Grace had generously expended the best Part of his Estate
in the Wars, living in a most noble and splendid Manner,
for the Honour of his Country: That therefore, in Consideration both of his great Services, and his illustrious Relations, if he had of late been so unfortunate as to fail in
any Part of his Conduct, they ought not to proceed against
him with the utmost Rigour of the Law; the rather, because he ever meant well, and was drawn into ill Measures
by crafty Ministers.' Sir Joseph Jekyll spoke likewise in
Favour of the Duke of Ormond: He said, 'That if there
was Room for Mercy, he hoped it would be shewn to that
noble, generous, and courageous Peer, who, for many Years,
had exerted those great Accomplishments for the Good and
Honour of his Country. That if of late he had the Misfortune to deviate from his former Conduct, the Blame ought
not, in Justice and Equity, be laid to him, but to them
principally, who abusing his Affection, Loyalty, and Zeal
for the Service of his Royal Mistress, had drawn him into
pernicious Counsels: That therefore, as the Statute of the
25th Edward III. on which the Charge of High Treason
against his Grace was to be grounded, had been mitigated
by subsequent Laws, the House ought not, in his Opinion,
to take Advantage of that Act against the Duke, but only
impeach him of High Crimes and Misdemeanours.' He
added, 'That some Persons endeavour'd to aggravate the
Duke of Ormond's Faults, by charging upon him the Riots
and Tumults which the Populace committed daily in many
Places; but that he durst averr, that his Grace did no Ways
countenance those disorders; and if the disaffected made use
of his Name, unknown to him, his Grace ought not to suffer
for it.' General Ross laid great Stress upon Sir Joseph
Jekyll's Opinion, and said all he could in his Commendation, and the Duke's Defence. Sir William Wyndham,
Member for Somersetshire, Mr Thomas Onslow, Member
for Surrey, Mr Ward, Mr Hungerford, and some other
Members of both Parties, spoke also on the same Side: But
Mr Lyddal, Member for Lestwithiel, Mr Hampden, and
Mr Thompson, (fn. 32) Member for Ipswich, did strongly support
General Stanhope's Motion; answer'd all that had been alledg'd in the Duke's Favour; and among other Things represented, 'That he ever affected Popularity; that he could
not be ignorant of the Tumults and Riots of which his
Name was the Signal; and that since he did not publickly
disown them who made Use of his Name, his Silence was
a tacit Approbation of their Proceedings, and seem'd to
summon the People to a general Insurrection.
The Impeachment of the Duke of Ormond agreed to by the House, and Articles against him order'd to be drawn up.
Sir Edward Northey, (fn. 33) Member for Tiverton, said that
he did not disown, but that in the Report of the Committee
of Secrecy, there were some Matters, on which an Impeachment of High Treason might be grounded against the Duke
of Ormond; but he did not think it proper to explain himself farther on that Occasion. Mr Lechmere, spoke plainer,
and mention'd a Case parallel to the Duke's, which had
been adjudg'd Treason. This Debate lasted from One till
about half an Hour past Ten, when the Question was put,
and resolv'd by a Majority of 234 Voices against 187, to
impeach James Duke of Ormond of High Treason, and
other High Crimes and Misdemeanours. After which it was
order'd, That it be referr'd to the Committee of Secrecy to
draw up Articles of Impeachment, and prepare Evidence
against James Duke of Ormond; and that the farther Consideration of the said Report be adjourn'd to the next
Morning.
Mr Aislaby impeaches Thomas Earl of Strafford of High Crimes and Misdemeanours.
June 22. The Commons resum'd the Consideration of the
Report from the Committee of Secrecy, and Mr Aislaby,
who spoke first, 'Took Notice of the general Concern that
had appear'd the Day before in the House, for the noble
Person that was impeach'd; because they were persuaded,
'twas rather through Weakness than Malice that he had
follow'd pernicious Counsels; but that, in his Opinion, few,
if any, would speak in Favour of another Lord, whom he
was to impeach. That the Person he meant, was Thomas
Earl of Strafford, one of the Plenipotentiaries of Great Britain at the Congress of Utrecht; whose Conduct had been
vastly different from that of his Colleague, the Lord Bishop
of London. (fn. 34) That this good and pious Prelate seem'd to
have been put at the Head of that Negociation, only to
palliate the Iniquity of it, under the Sacredness of his Character; but was little more than a Cypher in the Absence of
the Earl of Strafford. That the Bishop not being in the
Secret, had acted with Reserve and Caution, and would do
nothing without the Queen's special Commands; whereas
the Earl of Strafford not only was forward to venture and
undertake any Thing, as he expresses himself in one of his
Letters, to be the Tool of a Frenchify'd Ministry; but in
many Instances had gone beyond his Instructions, and advis'd the most pernicious Measures. That having impartially weigh'd the different Conduct of these two Ministers,
he was glad that nothing could be charg'd upon the Bishop,
since it gave them an Opportunity to convince the World,
that the Church is not in Danger; but mov'd that Thomas
Earl of Strafford be impeach'd of High Crimes and Misdemeanours.' Mr Aislaby afterwards enlarg'd upon this
Charge, which he reduc'd to these three principal Heads,
viz. I. 'The Earl of Strafford's advising the fatal Suspension
of Arms, which was soon after attended with several Misfortunes that befel the Allies; and at last reduc'd them to
the Necessity of submitting to the Terms of an unsafe, dishonourable Peace. II. Advising the seizing of Ghent and
Bruges, in order to distress the Allies, and favour the Enemy. III. The Insolence and Contempt with which he had
treated the most serene House of Hanover, and their Generals and Ministers.'
Debate thereon. ; The Impeachment against the Earl of Strafford, agreed to by the House, and Articles order'd to be drawn up against him.
Mr Bailie, having seconded Mr Aislaby, Sir William
Wyndham endeavour'd to justify the Earl of Strafford, as to
the first Head, by saying, 'That the Peace, which was
but the Sequel and necessary Consequence of the Suspension
of Arms, had been approv'd as such by two successive Parliaments, and declar'd advantageous, safe, and honourable.'
Mr Shippen, Mr Ward, and Mr Snell, Member for Gloucester, spoke also in Favour of the Earl of Strafford; as did
also Mr Hungerford, who, among other Things, said,
'That tho' the Bishop of London had an equal Share
with the Earl of Strafford in the Negociation of Peace, he
was, it seems, to have the Benefit of his Clergy.' General
Ross having likewise said something to excuse the Suspension
of Arms, General Cadogan (fn. 35) Member for Woodstock answer'd, 'That considering the Situation of both Armies,
the Confederates lost the fairest Opportunity they ever had
in Flanders, to destroy the Enemy's Army, and to penetrate
into the very Heart of France;' but added, 'That nothing
less could be expected from a Princess and a Ministry, who
had entirely deliver'd themselves into the Hands of France.'
Sir James Campbel, Member for the Shire of Argyle spoke
also against the Earl of Strafford: Sir David Dalrymple,
summ'd up what had been said on both Sides; and having
illustrated the present Case by parallel Instances and proper
Observations, urg'd, that both by the Civil and Statute
Laws, the Earl of Strafford was, at least, guilty of High
Crimes and Misdemeanours. Hereupon, about seven in the
Evening, the Question was put, and by 268 Voices against
100, it was resolv'd, That the House will impeach Thomas
Earl of Strafford of High Crimes and Misdemeanours; and
order'd, That it be referr'd to the Committee of Secrecy,
to draw up Articles of Impeachment, and prepare Evidence
against the said Earl.
Debate on the Bill for explaining the Act of K. W. III. For the Limitation of the Crown, &c.
July 4. The House resolv'd' itself into a grand Committee, upon an ingrossed Bill from the Lords, intitled, An
Act to explain the Act made in the 12th Year of King
William the Third, intitled, An Act for the farther Limitation of the Crown, and better securing the Rights and Liberties of the Subject. A Clause having been inserted in
the said Bill, whereby a Door seem'd to be left open for
the Admission of Foreigners into Places, many of the Court
Party, headed by Mr Hampden, look'd upon that Bill as
dangerous to our Constitution; and the Friends of the late
Ministry, who resolv'd to oppose it, thinking this a proper
Opportunity to make it drop, mov'd that the Consideration
of it be put off to another Day: But the Question being put
thereupon was carried in the Negative by 141 against 139.
Then the Committee went thro' the Bill, and made an
Amendment to the Clause before-mention'd, the Report of
which was put off 'till the 6th of July. On that Day Mr
Lowther, Member for Cumberland, reported from the
Committee of the whole House, to whom the engrossed Bill
from the Lords, intitled, An Act to explain the Act made in
the 12th Year of the Reign of King William III. intitled, An
Act for the farther Limitation of the Crown, &c. was committed, the Amendment they had directed him to report to
the House; which he read in his Place, and afterwards delivered in at the Table, where the same was twice read:
And a Motion being made, that the Bill be recommitted,
there arose a Debate that lasted near three Hours: Mr Shippen, with some others raised several Objections against the
Bill, but were answered by Mr Robert Walpole, Mr Boscawen, and some others of the Court Party, and the Question being put upon the said Motion, it was carried in the Negative by 190 against 140. And then the Amendment,
with an Amendment thereto, was agreed to by the House.
Mr Walpole from the Committee of Secrecy reports the first ten Articles against the Earl of Oxford.
July 7. Mr Robert Walpole, from the Committee of Secrecy, acquainted the House, 'That the Committee having
prepared Articles of Impeachment of High Treason and other
High Crimes and Misdemeanours, against Robert Earl of
Oxford and Earl Mortimer, had commanded him to acquaint
the House, that they should, in a short Time, have farther
Articles against the said Earl; and that the Committee had
directed him to report the Articles, already prepared, to the
House:' And he read them in his Place, and afterwards delivered them in at the Table, where they were once read.
Debate thereon. ; Debate on the Eleventh Article. ; The said Articles agreed to,
After this it was moved that the farther Consideration of
the said Articles be adjourn'd to that Day se'nnight; but it
was carry'd, without dividing, That the said Report be read
a second Time the next Day. At which Time the first Ten
Articles of Impeachment against Robert Earl of Oxford
and Earl Mortimer, were read a second Time; and upon
the Question severally put thereupon, with Amendments to
some of them, there was a long Debate from Two 'till
Eight in the Evening, when they were agreed to, by 280
against 125. Then a Motion being made and the Question
put, That the farther Consideration of the said Report be
adjourn'd 'till the next Morning, the same was carry'd in
the Negative, by 247 against 139. Hereupon the Eleventh
Article was read a second Time, and amended by the House;
and then there arose a great Debate, upon the Question,
Whether the said Article was High Treason? Sir Robert
Raymond, Mr William Bromley, (fn. 36) Member for the University of Oxford, Sir William Wyndham, Mr Edward Harley,
Mr Thomas Foley, Mr Ward, and Mr Hungerford, maintain'd the Negative; and were strongly supported by Sir Joseph Jekyll, one of the Committee of Secrecy, who said,
'That it was ever his Principle to do Justice to every Body,
from the highest to the lowest; being persuaded, that it was
the Duty of an honest Man never to act by a Spirit of Party.
That he hoped he might pretend to have some Knowledge
of the Laws of the Kingdom; and as, in the Committee of
Secrecy, he had taken the Liberty to differ from his Colleagues, he would not scruple to declare now to the whole
House, that, in his Judgment, the Charge in Question did
not amount to High Treason.' Most of the other Members
of the Committee of Secrecy were offended at this Speech:
And thereupon Mr Robert Walpole answer'd, 'That there
were both in and out of the Committee of Secrecy, several
Persons, who did not, in the least, yield to the Member that
spoke last, in Point of Honesty; and who, without derogating from his Merit, were superior to him in the Knowledge
of the Laws; but who, at the same Time, were satisfied
that the Charge specified in the Eleventh Article amounted
to Treason.' Mr Walpole was back'd by General Stanhope,
the Lord Coningsby, General Cadogan, Mr Boscawen, and
Mr Aislaby; and the Eleventh Article being amended, the
same was agreed to by the House, by 247 Votes against 127.
Mr Harley endeavoured to justify the Earl of Oxford,
I. By urging that he ever acted by the late Queen's positive
Commands; to prove which, he offered to produce two Letters from her Majesty; and II. The Necessity of making a
Peace; He having upon this Occasion, advanc'd, that the
Dutch prolong'd the War, and that their Deputies in the
Army had often prevented the giving the Enemy a decisive
Blow. General Cadogan answer'd, that the Dutch were
more concern'd than any Prince or State in the Grand Alli
ance to put an End to the War; and undertook to prove,
that there had not been any Campaign in Flanders, except
that in which the Duke of Ormond commanded, that was
not mark'd and famous to all Posterity, for some signal and
glorious Event, to the Advantage of the common Cause?
Then the rest of the Sixteen Articles were severally read a
second Time, and with Amendments to some of them, agreed
unto by the House, who ordered, That the said Articles
be engrossed; and, that a Clause be prepared saving Liberty
to the Commons to exhibit any farther Articles against the
said Robert Earl of Oxford and Earl Mortimer; and that he
may be sequester'd from Parliament, and committed to safe
Custody.
And ordered to be carried to the Lords by Lord Coningsby.
July 9. The above Clause was offered to the House; and
being twice read, and agreed to, was ordered to be engrossed
with the Articles of Impeachment. The same Day the Ingrossed Articles of Impeachment against Robert Earl of Oxford and Earl Mortimer, were read; after which it was order'd, I. That the Lord Coningsby do carry the said Articles
to the Lords: II. That his Lordship be directed, before he
exhibit the said Articles to the Lords, to impeach Robert
Earl of Oxford and Mortimer, to the Effect following, viz.
My Lords,
'The Commons assembled in Parliament having received Information of divers traiterous Practices and
Designs of a great Peer of this House, Robert Earl of
Oxford and Earl Mortimer; have commanded me to impeach the said Earl of Oxford and Earl Mortimer, of High
Treason, and other High Crimes and Misdemeanours:
And I do here in their Names, and in the Names of all the
Commons of Great Britain, impeach Robert Earl of Oxford and Earl Mortimer, of High Treason, and other High
Crimes and Misdemeanours. I am farther commanded by
the House of Commons to pray and demand of your Lordships, That the Earl of Oxford and Earl Mortimer may be
sequester'd from Parliament, and forthwith committed to
safe Custody.
After this, the Lord Coningsby, attended by most of those
Members who voted for the Impeachment, went up to the
House of Peers, and at their Bar impeached Robert Earl of
Oxford and Earl Mortimer, in the Form above-mentioned;
and then left with their Lordships the Articles of Impeachment against the said Earl, which the Reader may find at
large in the STATE TRIALS, Vol. 6. p. 103.
July 20, The King came to the House of Lords, and the
Commons being sent for, his Majesty gave the Royal Assent
to such Bills as were ready; after which the Lord Chancellor read a Speech deliver'd into his Hands by his Majesty
from the Throne, as follows:
King's Speech relating to an Invasion by the Pretender.
My Lords and Gentlemen,
"The Zeal you have shewn for preserving the Peace
of my Kingdoms, and your Wisdom in providing so
good a Law to prevent all riotous and tumultuous Proceedings, give me great Satisfaction; but I am sorry to find
that such a Spirit of Rebellion has discover'd itself, as leaves
no Room to doubt, but these Disorders are set on Foot
and encourag'd by Persons disaffected to my Government,
in Expectation of being supported from Abroad.
"The Preservation of our excellent Constitution, and the
Security of our holy Religion, has been, and always shall
be, my chief Care; and I cannot question but your Concern for these invaluable Blessings is so great, as not to let
them be expos'd to such Attempts as I have certain Advices are preparing by the Pretender from Abroad, and
carrying on at Home by a restless Party in his Favour.
Gentlemen of the House of Commons,
"In these Circumstances, I think it proper to ask your
Assistance, and make no doubt but you will so far consult
your own Security, as not to leave the Nation, under a
Rebellion actually begun at Home, and threaten'd with
an Invasion from Abroad, in a defenceless Condition:
And I shall look upon the Provision you shall make for
the Safety of my People, as the best Mark of your Affection to me.
Commons Address of Thanks. ; Mr Freeman's Motion thereon.
The Commons being return'd to their House, it was resolv'd, Nemine Contradicente, That an humble Address be
presented to his Majesty, to return the most humble and dutiful Thanks of this House to his Majesty, for communicating to his Parliament, the Advices he has received of an Attempt preparing to be made upon the Nation from Abroad,
abetted and encouraged by treasonable Practices at Home, in
Favour of a Popish Pretender; and to assure his Majesty,
that this House will, with their Lives and Fortunes, stand by
and support his Majesty against all his open and secret Enemies; and to desire his Majesty, that he will immediately
give Directions for sitting out such a Number of Ships as may
effectually guard the Coasts, and to issue out Commissions for
augmenting his Forces by Land; assuring his Majesty, this
House will, without Loss of Time, effectually enable him to
raise and maintain such a Number of Forces, both by Sea
and Land, as shall be necessary for the Defence of his sacred
Person, and for the Security of his Kingdoms. After this,
Mr Freeman, Member for Hertfordshire, stood up, and represented, 'That in so important a Juncture, they ought to
lose no Time in drawing up an Address; and therefore
mov'd, That the said Resolution be forthwith laid before his
Majesty by the whole House.' He was seconded by the Lord
Guernsey, Member for Surry, who said, 'It was well known
he had, on many Occasions, differ'd from some Members in
that House; but being now convinc'd that our Liberty, Religion, and all that is dear to Englishmen, were aim'd at, he
would, laying his Hand on his Sword, rather die with his
Sword in his Hand, than survive the Pretender's coming in,
tho' he were to enjoy the greatest Honours and Preferments
under him.' Mr Hampden having likewise back'd Mr Freeman's Motion, it pass'd into a Resolution, Nem. Con. and
Mr Boscawen, who was order'd to wait on the King to know
his Majesty's Pleasure, when he would be attended by
the House, having, about six in the Evening, reported,
that his Majesty had been pleased to appoint immediately at
his Palace at St James's, the House went thither, with their
Speaker, and laid before his Majesty the said Resolution, to
which the King was pleas'd to return the following Answer.
King's Answer thereto.
Gentlemen,
"I Thank you heartily for this Address. The Zeal and
Vigour which you shew upon this Occasion, will, I
trust in God, enable me to defeat the evil Designs of our
Enemies. I will immediately give Directions for such an
Increase of our Forces, by Sea and Land, as I shall judge
necessary for your Security; and will order Estimates of
the Charge thereof to be laid before you.
Mr R. Walpole's Motion for an Address to the King, to allow the Officers on Half-Pay Full Pay. ; The Address agreed to. ; The King's Answer.
July 26. Mr Robert Walpole took Notice, 'Of the Measures the King had taken, pursuant to the Desire and Advice
of that House, to secure his Dominions; but represented,
that in Case of an Invasion, the Standing Troops and new
Levies would hardly be sufficient; and as he thought it necessary, so he mov'd, that the Officers in Half-Pay should
be put in a Capacity to serve the Nation, by allowing them
Full Pay.' General Stanhope seconded Mr Walpole's Mation; and General Ross only having made a slight Objection
to it, suggesting, that, to save Expences, the Standing Regiments might be augmented, it was resolved, That an
humble Address be presented to his Majesty, that he would
be graciously pleased to allow Full Pay to such Half-Pay Officers as were not otherwise provided for; and that his Majesty would give Orders to the said Officers to hold themselves in Readiness, to be employ'd in such Manner as his
Majesty should think fit; and to assure his Majesty, that
this House will supply such extraordinary Expence as his
Majesty should be at on this Account, out of the next Aids
to be afterwards granted by Parliament. This Address being
the same Day presented to the King, his Majesty was pleas'd
to say, "That he look'd upon it as a fresh Instance of the
Duty and Affection of this House, and of their Zeal for
the Security and Preservation of his People and Government.
Mr Walpole, from the Committee of Secrecy, reports farther Articles against the Earl of Oxford;
July 30. Mr R. Walpole reported from the Committee of
Secrecy, that they had directed him to exhibit farther Articles of Impeachment of High Crimes and Misdemeanours
against Robert Earl of Oxford and Earl Mortimer, which he
read in his Place, and afterwards delivered them in at the
Table, where they were read; and a Motion being made,
and the Question put, that the farther Consideration of the
said Articles be adjourn'd 'till the Tuesday following, it pass'd
in the Negative. After this it was order'd, that the said Articles be read one by one; which was done accordingly, and,
with Amendments to one of them, upon the Question severally put thereupon, they were agreed to by the House;
who order'd, That the said Articles be engrossed; and, that
a Clause be prepared for saving Liberty to the Commons to
exhibit any farther Articles against the said Robert Earl of
Oxford and Earl Mortimer.
Which being agreed to, Lord Coningsby is ordered to carry to the Lords.
August 2. The engrossed farther Articles of Impeachment
against Robert Earl of Oxford and Earl Mortimer were read;
after which it was order'd, that the Lord Coningsby do carry
those Articles also to the Lords; which his Lordship did immediately. The said farther Articles the Reader may see in
the STATE TRIALS, Vol. 6, p. 116. The same Day the
King went to the House of Peers, and the Commons being sent for and attending, his Majesty gave the Royal Assent
to such Bills as were ready.
Mr Walpole reports the Articles of Impeachment against Lord Bolingbroke. ; Which are agreed to.
August 4. Mr R. Walpole from the Committee of Secrecy
acquainted the House, that the Committee had prepared Articles of Impeachment of High Treason, and other High
Crimes and Misdemeanors against Henry Viscount Bolingbroke; and that the Committee had commanded him, at the
same Time, to acquaint the House, that they shall, in a
short Time, have farther Articles to lay before the House
against him; and that the Committee had directed him to
report the Articles already prepared, to the House. Then
Mr Walpole read the Articles in his Place, and afterwards
delivered them in at the Table, where they were once read,
and then a second Time, Article by Article, and upon the
Question severally put thereupon, agreed unto by the House;
who order'd, That the said Articles be engrossed; and that a
Clause be prepared, for saving Liberty to the Commons to
exhibit any farther Articles against the said Henry Viscount
Bolingbroke, and that he may be sequestred from Parliament
and committed to safe Custody.
Mr Walpole reports the Articles of Impeachment against the Duke of Ormond. ; Debate thereon.
August 5. Mr R. Walpole, from the Committee of Secrecy,
acquainted the House, that the Committee had prepared
Articles of Impeachment of High Treason, and other High
Crimes, and Misdemeanours, against James Duke of Ormond, which they had directed him to report to the House.
Then Mr Walpole read the said Articles in his Place, and
afterwards deliver'd them in at the Table, where they were
once read; and afterwards a second Time, Article by Article. A Motion being made, and the Question put, that
the House, agree to the First Article, there arose a warm
Debate, in which a Member said, that the Report of the
Committee of Secrecy had begun to open his Eyes; and
that the Duke of Ormond's Flight had fully convinc'd him,
that the Heads of the Tory Party were a Set of Knaves and
Villains, who design'd to have ruin'd their Country, and
made it a Province of France. The Lord (fn. 37) Stanhope, Member for St Germans, said, he never wish'd to spill the Blood
of any of his Countrymen, much less the Blood of any
Nobleman; but that he was persuaded, that the Safety of
his Country required that Examples should be made of those
who had betray'd it in so infamous a Manner. The Lord
(fn. 38) Finch, Member for Rutlandshire, spoke also on the same
Side; and after some other Speeches, the First Article was
agreed to by a Majority of 177 Voices against 78; and
then the other Articles, upon the Question severally put
thereupon, were also agreed unto by the House: After
which it was order'd, That the said Articles be engrossed;
and that a Clause be prepared for saving Liberty to the Commons to exhibit any farther Articles against the said James
Duke of Ormond; and that he may be sequester'd from
Parliament, and committed to safe Custody.
Mr Walpole order'd to carry up to the Lords the Articles against Lord Bolingbroke.
August 6. The engrossed Articles, against Henry Viscount
Bolingbroke, were read, after which it was order'd, I. That
Mr R. Walpole do carry the said Articles to the Lords;
II. That he be directed, before he exhibits the said Articles to
the Lords, to impeach Henry Viscount Bolingbroke to the
Effect following, viz.
My Lords,
'The Commons assembled in Parliament having receiv'd
Information of divers traiterous Practices and Designs
of a great Peer of this House, Henry Viscount Bolingbroke,
have commanded me to impeach the said Henry Viscount
Bolingbroke of High Treason, and other High Crimes
and Misdemeanours: And I do here in their Names, and
in the Names of all the Commons of Great Britain, impeach the said Henry Viscount Bolingbroke of High Treason, and other High Crimes and Misdemeanours. I am
farther commanded by the House of Commons to pray
and demand of your Lordships, that the said Henry Viscount Bolingbroke may be sequestred from Parliament,
and forthwith committed to safe Custody.'
Who being sled, is attainted of High Treason.
Accordingly, the same Day, Mr Walpole accompanied
by a great many Members of the Commons, at the Bar of
the House of Lords, impeach'd Henry Lord Viscount Bolingbroke as above; and the same Day the Lords sent a
Message to acquaint the Commons, that their Lordships had
order'd Henry Viscount Bolingbroke to be forthwith attach'd, by the Gentleman Usher of the Black-Rod attending
the House of Lords, and brought to their Lordships Bar, to
answer the Articles exhibited against him by the House of
Commons: But the Lord Bolingbroke had long before retir'd into France. Hereupon the Commons order'd a Bill
to be brought in to summon Henry Viscount Bolingbroke
to render himself to Justice by a Day therein to be limited,
or, in Default thereof, to attaint him of High Treason.
General Stanhope ordered to carry to the Lords the Articles against the Duke of Ormond. ; Who being gone off is also attainted.
August 8. The engrossed Articles against the Duke of Ormond were read, upon which it was order'd I. That General
Stanhope do carry the said Articles to the Lords; II. That
he be directed to impeach James Duke of Ormond, in the
same Form as Henry Viscount Bolingbroke; which he did
the same Day. The Articles of both which Impeachments
may be seen in the POLITICAL STATE for August 1715.
But the Duke of Ormond on the 21st of July before, embarking privately on board a Vessel on the Kentish Coast,
landed in three Days in France: Upon which the Commons
August the 10th, order'd a Bill to be brought in to summon
and attaint him in like Manner as the Lord Viscount Bolingbroke. Those two Bills having pass'd both Houses, receiv'd the Royal Assent.
Mr Walpole reports the Articles against the Earl of Strafford.
August 31. Mr. Walpole, from the Committee of Secrecy,
acquainted the House that the Committee had prepared Articles of Impeachment of High Crimes and Misdemeanours
against Thomas Earl of Strafford; which he read in his
Place, and afterwards deliver'd in at the Table, where they
were read. Then it was order'd, that the said Articles be
read a second Time, Article by Article; which being done
accordingly, the said Articles were severally agreed unto by
the House, who order'd, that the said Articles be engrossed;
and that a Clause be prepared, saving Liberty to the Commons, to exhibit any farther Articles against the said Thomas
Earl of Strafford, and that he may be put to answer the said
Crimes and Misdemeanours.
Which being agreed to, Mr Aislaby carries up to the Lords.
September 1. The said Clause was offer'd to the House,
read, agreed to, and order'd to be engrossed with the Articles
of Impeachment; which being done accordingly, the said engrossed Articles of Impeachment of High Crimes and Misdemeanours against Thomas Earl of Strafford, were read, and
it was order'd, I. That Mr. Aislaby do carry the said Articles
to the Lords; II. That, before he exhibit the said Articles, he
do, at the Bar of the House of Lords, impeach the said Thomas Earl of Strafford of High Crimes and Misdemeanours:
which Mr. Aislaby, accompanied by many Members, did
immediately; The Articles at large the Reader will find in
the POLITICAL STATE for September 1715.
Earl of Oxford's Answer to the Articles of Impeachment read. ; Debate thereon. ; Mr. Walpole reports the Replication to the Earl of Oxford's Answer, which being agreed, to Lord Coningsby is order'd to carry to the Lords.
September 7. The Lords sent a Message to acquaint the Commons, that the Earl of Oxford and Earl Mortimer had put in
his Answer to the said Articles of Impeachment; and also
to deliver to the House of Commons a true Copy thereof,
for which we refer to the STATE TRIALS, Vol. 6. p. 123.
Hereupon the Commons order'd that the said Answer be
read on the Monday following, and the said Answer being
then read accordingly, there arose a small Debate. Mr Robert Walpole, among other Things, said, 'He had not yet
had Time to peruse and examine that Answer, but that he
now heard it read with a great deal of Attention, and, in his
Opinion, it contain'd little more than what had been suggested in Vindication of the late Measures, in a Pamphlet intituled, The Conduct of the Allies, and repeated over and over
in the Papers call'd, The Examiner. That the main Drift of
this Answer seem'd to prove these two Assertions, I. That
the Earl of Oxford had no Share in the advising and managing the Matters mention'd in the Articles against him, but
that the late Queen did every Thing; and II. That the
late Queen was a wise, good, and pious Princess. That if
the second Proposition were not better grounded than the first,
the Reputation of that excellent Princess would be very precarious: But as every-body must own her to have been a
good and pious Queen, so it was notorious that the Earl of Oxford, as prime Minister, was the chief Adviser, Promoter, and
Manager, of the Matters charged upon him in the Articles:
And therefore his Answer was a false and mallcious Libel,
laying upon his Royal Mistress the Blame of all the pernicious Measures he had led her into, against her own Honour
and the Good of his Country: That he hoped the Earl's endeavouring to screen himself behind the Queen's Name,
would avail him nothing: That 'tis, indeed, a Fundamental
Maxim of our Constitution, that Kings can do no Wrong;
but that, at the same Time, 'tis no less certain, that Ministers of State are accountable for their Actions; otherwise a
Parliament would be but an empty Name; the Commons
would have no Business in that Place; and the Government
would be absolute and arbitrary. That though the Earl had
the Assurance to aver, that he had no Share in the Management of Affairs that were transacted while he was at the Helm,
yet he pretended to justify the late Measures: And therefore,
in that Respect, his Answer ought to be look'd upon as a Libel
on the Proceedings of the Commons, since he endeavour'd to
clear those Persons, who had already confess'd their Guilt by
their Flight. Mr. Shippen could not be altogether silent on
this Occasion: He said, ' That it would not become him to
desend the Earl's Answer, since, as a Member of that honourable Assembly, he was become one of his Accusers: But that
he could not forbear wishing, that this Prosecution might be
dropt, and that the House would be satisfy'd with the two late
Acts of Attainder. That this Wish of his was the stronger,
because one of the principal Reasons that induc'd the Commons to impeach the Earl of Oxford, subsisted no longer, the
Affairs of Europe having receiv'd a sudden Turn from the
Death of the French King; whereby the Renunciation of
King Philip began to take place, in the Advancement of the
Duke of Orleans to the absolute Regency of France.' Mr.
Aislaby answer'd, 'That he hoped 'twas to little Purpose
the Gentleman who spoke last, endeavour'd to move the Pity
and Compassion of the House, and persuade them to drop
this Prosecution. That this was not a proper Time to examine and reply to the Earl of Oxford's Answer; and therefore he would content himself with saying, in general, that it
was a Contexture of the Shifts, Evasions, and false Representations, contain'd in the three Parts of The History of the
White-Staff. That as to what had been suggested concerning the Event which seem'd to have strengthen'd the Renunciation, he did not deny, there might be something in it; which
was manifest from the great Joy the well-affected to the Government had shewn, on this Occasion, and from the Mortification and Despair that appear'd in the Faces of a certain
Party: But that, after all, it could not yet be ascertain'd, that
the Renunciation was in Force; that there was a vast Difference between the Regency and the Crown; that Time only
would decide that Matter; but that even supposing that, by
the Concurrence of unforeseen Events, King Philip's Renunciation should, at last, take place, yet the same would not
justify the Ministers who proposed and laid it as the Foundation of the late Peace, since they with whom they treated, were
so frank and so sincere as to tell them, that it could never be
valid, by the Fundamental Laws of France.' After some other
Speeches, it was order'd, That the Answer of Robert Earl of
Oxford and Earl Mortimer, be referr'd to the Committee appointed to draw up Articles of Impeachment and prepare Evidence against the impeach'd Lords; and that the said Committee do prepare a Replication to the said Answer: Accordingly on Sept. 16. Mr. Robert Walpole, from the Committee,
reported the said Replication, which he read in his Place, and
afterwards deliver'd in at the Table, where the same was
read, agreed unto, and order'd to be engross'd. The Monday
after the engrossed Replication was read, and it was order'd,
that Lord Coningsby do carry the same to the Lords; which
his Lordship did accordingly. The Reader will find the said
Replication at large in the STATE-TRIALS, Vol. 6. p. 147.
The Committee of Secrecy impowered to fit notwithstanding the Adjournment of the House.
September 20. Mr. Walpole reported from the Committee
appointed to draw up Articles of Impeachment, and to prepare Evidence against the impeach'd Lords, that they having,
pursuant to the Order of Reference from the House, consider'd of the State and Circumstances of the Commitment of
Mr. Prior, thought proper to make a Report thereupon to
the House. After Reading the said Report the Commons
order'd, that the Committee appointed to draw up Articles
of Impeachment, and to prepare Evidence against the impeach'd Lords, be impower'd to fit, notwithstanding any
Adjournment of the House.
Sir W. Wyndham, Sir John Packington, Mr. Ed. Harvey, Mr. Foster, Mr. Anftis, and Mr. C. Kynaston, order'd, at the King's Request, to be apprehended.
September 21. General Stanhope, Secretary of State, acquainted the Commons, That he was commanded by the
King to communicate to the House, that his Majesty having
just Cause to suspect, that Sir William Wyndham, Member
for Somersetshire; Sir John Packington, Member for Worcestershire; Mr. Edward Harvey, Member for Clithero; Mr.
Foster, Member for Northumberland; Mr. Anftis, Member
for Launceston; and Mr. Corbet Kynaston, Member for
Shrewsbury, are engag'd in a Design to support the intended
Invasion of this Kingdom, hath given Order for apprehending
them; and his Majesty desires the Consent of this House to
his causing them to be committed and detain'd, if he shall
judge it necessary so to do, in Pursuance of the late Act of
Parliament for impowering his Majesty to commit and detain
such Persons as his Majesty shall suspect are conspiring against
his Person and Government. Hereupon it was resolv'd, Nem.
Con. That an humble Address be presented to his Majesty,
returning the Thanks of this House for his gracious Message
this Day, and for his tender Regard to the Privileges of this
House; and to desire, that he will be pleas'd to give Orders
for the committing and detaining the several Members
nam'd in the said Message, pursuant to the Act of this
Session of Parliament for that Purpose.
Scaffold order'd to be erected for the Earl of Oxford's Trial.
The same Day, the Lords sent a Message to acquaint the
Commons, That their Lordships having address'd his Majesty,
humbly to desire, that he would be pleas'd to cause-Directions
to be given to the proper Officers for preparing a Scaffold in
Westminster-Hall, for the Trial of Robert Earl of Oxford and
Earl Mortimer, who now stands impeach'd by this House of
High Treason, and other High Crimes and Misdemeanors,
his Majesty had been graciously pleas'd to say, "He would
give Directions to the proper Officers pursuant to the said
Address."
The same Day likewise the King went to the House of
Peers, and the Commons attending, the Speaker, upon presenting the Money-Bills, made the following Speech to his
Majesty:
The Speaker's Speech to the King, on presenting the Money-Bills.
Most Gracious Sovereign,
'Your Majesty's most dutiful and loyal Subjects, the
Knights, Citizens, and Burgesses in Parliament assembled, have now finish'd the Supplies granted to your Majesty for the Service of this present Year. Your Commons had much sooner offer'd these Supplies to your Majesty, had not their Zeal for your Majesty's Service, and
the Duty they owe to their Country, led them into Inquiries which have drawn this Session to an unusual Length.
'But your Commons could not see, without the utmost
Indignation, the Glories of her late Majesty's Reign tarnish'd by a treacherous Cessation of Arms; the Faith of
Treaties violated; that ancient Probity, for which the
English Nation had been justly renown'd throughout all
Ages, expos'd to Scorn and Contempt; and the Trade of
the Kingdom given up by insidious and precarious Treaties
of Commerce, whilst the People, amused with new
Worlds explor'd, were contented to see the most advantageous Branches of their Commerce in Europe lost, or betray'd.
'Such was the Condition of this Kingdom, when it
pleas'd the Divine Providence to call your Majesty to the
Throne of your Ancestors, under whose auspicious Reign
your Commons with Pleasure behold the Glories of the
Plantagenets (your Majesty's royal Ancestors) revive; and
have an unbounded Prospect of the Continuance of this
Happiness, even to the latest Posterity, in a Race of
Princes lineally descended from your Majesty.
'And that nothing might be wanting on the Part of your
Commons, to establish your Majesty's Throne on solid and
lasting Foundations, they have apply'd themselves, with
unweary'd Diligence, to vindicate the Honour of the
British Nation, and to restore a mutual Confidence between
this Kingdom and its ancient and faithful Allies, by detecting the Authors of these pernicious Counsels, and the
Actors in these treacherous Designs, in order to bring them
to Justice, by the Judgment of their Peers, according to
the Law of the Land, and the Usage of Parliament.
'It was not to be expected, but that the Enemies to the
Nation's Peace, would use their utmost Endeavours to obstruct your Commons in these Inquiries; but despairing
of any Success in the Representative Body of the Kingdom,
they fomented Tumults among the Dregs of the People
at Home, and spirited up the Pretender to an Invasion
from Abroad, This gave your faithful Commons fresh
Opportunities of shewing their Affection to your Majesty's
Person, and their Fidelity to your Government, by their
unanimous Concurrence in granting such Supplies as were
sufficient to disappoint the one, and by their passing such
Laws as were necessary to suppress the other; and, in
every Respect, to express their Abhorrence of a Popish
Pretender, concerning whom, nothing remains unsuspected,
but his Bigotry to Superstition, and his Hatred to our
holy Religion; for the Advancement of which your Majesty has express'd your pious Care, by recommending to
your Commons the providing Maintenance for the Ministers who are to officiate in the new Churches. This your
Commons readily comply'd with, trusting, that the Prayers
there offer'd to the Almighty, will bring down a Blessing
on all your Majesty's Undertakings; and not doubting,
but that the Doctrines there taught, will be a Means to
secure the Quiet of your Kingdoms, and the Obedience
of your People.
'The Revenue set apart for the Uses of the Civil Government, your Commons found so much intangled with
Mortgages and Anticipations, that what remain'd, was far
from being sufficient to support the Honour and Dignity
of the Crown: This your Commons took into serious
Consideration, and being truly sensible, that on your Majesty's Greatness the Happiness of your Subjects entirely
depends, they have put the Civil Revenues into the same
State, in which they were granted to your Majesty's glorious Predecessor, King William, of immortal Memory;
and thereby enabled your Majesty to make an ample Provision for the Prince of Wales, whose heroick Virtues are
the best Security of your Majesty's Throne, as his other personal Endowments are the Joy of all your faithful Subjects.
'I should but ill discharge the Trust reposed in me by
the Commons, did I not lay before your Majesty, with
what Cheerfulness they receiv'd your Majesty's gracious
Intentions for her Royal Highness the Princess; and with
how much Readiness and Unanimity they enabled your
Majesty to settle a Revenue suitable to the Dignity of a
Princess, whose Piety, and steady Adherence to the Protestant Religion, is the Glory of the present Age, and
will be the Admiration of all future Generations.
'May it please your Majesty,
'The Bills which the Commons have prepar'd to compleat the Supplies for this Year's Service, and for the
other Purposes I have mention'd, are severally intitled,
I. An Act to enable his Majesty to settle a Revenue for supporting the Dignity of her Royal Highness, &c.
II. An Act for enlarging the Capital Stock and yearly Fund
of the South-Sea Company, &c
III. An Act for making Provision for the Ministers of the fifty
new Churches, &c.
'Which they with all Humility now present to your
Majesty for your Royal Assent.'
After this, his Majesty gave the Royal Assent to the three
Bills before mention'd, as also to fix more publick, and
to nine private Bills.
Then his Majesty was pleas'd to declare from the Throne,
that he had order'd the Lord Chancellor to deliver his Majesty's Speech to both Houses of Parliament, in his Majesty's
Name and Words, which he did accordingly, as follows:
The King's Speech at adjourning the Parliament.
My Lords and Gentlemen,
"I Am perswaded you are all by this Time very desirous
of some Recess, and that it cannot be deferr'd longer,
without great Inconvenience to your private Affairs.
"But before I part with you, I must return you my most
sincere Thanks for your having finish'd, with so much
Wisdom and Unanimity, what I recommended to your
Care; and particularly I must thank you, Gentlemen of
the House of Commons, for the Provision you have made,
as well for the Support of the Honour and Dignity of
the Crown, as for the other necessary Occasions of the
Publick; especially for your having done it by Means so
little burthensome to my People; which, I assure you,
recommends the Supplies to me above any other Circumstance whatsoever.
My Lords and Gentlemen,
"The open and declar'd Rebellion, which is now actually
begun in Scotland, must convince all, who do not wish to
see us given up into the Hands of a Popish Pretender, of
the Dangers to which we have been, and are still expos'd.
"I thought it incumbent upon me, to give you the earliest Notice of the Designs of our Enemies, and I cannot
sufficiently commend the Zeal and Dispatch with which
you impower'd me, at a Time when the Nation was in
so naked and defenceless a Condition, to make such Preparations as I should think necessary for our Security.
You shall have no Reason to repent of the Trust and Confidence you repose in me, which I shall never use to any
other End than for the Protection and Welfare of my
People.
"It was scarce to be imagin'd, that any of my Protestant
Subjects, who have known and enjoy'd the Benefits of
our excellent Constitution, and have heard of the great
Dangers they were wonderfully deliver'd from by the
happy Revolution, should, by any Arts and Management, be drawn into Measures that must at once destroy
their Religion and Liberties, and subject them to Popery
and arbitrary Power, but such has been our Misfortune,
that too many of my People have been deluded, and
made instrumental to the Pretender's Designs, who had
never dar'd to think of invading us, or raising a Rebellion,
had he not been encourag'd by the Success his Emissaries
and Adherents have already had in stirring up Riots and
Tumults, and by the farther Hopes they entertain of
raising Insurrections in many Parts of my Kingdoms.
"The endeavouring to persuade my People, that the
Church of England is in Danger under my Government,
has been the main Artifice employ'd in carrying on this
wicked and traiterous Design. This Insinuation, after
the solemn Assurances I have given, and by having laid
hold on all Opportunities, to do every Thing that may
tend to the Advantage of the Church of England, is both
unjust and ungrateful: Nor can I believe so groundless
and malicious a Calumny can make any Impression upon
the Minds of my faithful Subjects, or that they can be
so far misled, as to think the Church of England is to be
secur'd by setting a Popish Pretender on the Throne.
My Lords and Gentlemen,
"The Proofs this Parliament has given of their unshaken
Duty and Affection to me, and of their Love and Zeal
for the Interest of their Country, will recommend you to
the good Opinion and Esteem of all who have their Religion and Liberty truly at Heart, and has laid a lasting
Obligation upon me; and I question not, but by your
farther Assistance in the several Countries to which you
are going, with the Blessing of Almighty God, who has
so frequently interpos'd in Favour of this Nation, I shall
be able to disappoint and defeat the Designs of our Enemies.
"Our Meeting again to do Business early in the next
Winter, will be useful on many Accounts; particularly,
that the sitting of Parliaments may be again brought into
that Season of the Year which is most convenient; and
that as little Delay may be given as is possible to your
judicial Proceedings; and I shall at present give such
Orders to my Lord Chancellor, as may not put it long
out of my Power to meet you on any sudden Occasion."
And then the Lord Chancellor, by his Majesty's Command, said,
The House adjourns to Oct. 6th.
My Lords and Gentlemen,
'It is his Majesty's Royal Will and Pleasure, that both
Houses should forthwith severally adjourn themselves to
Thursday the sixth Day of October next.'