Mr Hutcheson's SPEECH In the DEBATE concerning the Number of Land-Forces for the Year 1718.
[See Page 155.]
Mr Speaker,
THE first Footsteps I find of a Standing Army in England, since the Romans left the Island, were in Richard
the Second's Time, who rais'd Four Thousand Archers in
Cheshire, and suffer'd them to plunder, live upon free Quarter, beat, wound, ravish and kill wherever they went; and
afterwards he call'd a Parliament, encompass'd them with
his Archers, forc'd them to give up the whole Power of
Parliaments, and make it Treason to endeavour to repeal
any of the arbitrary Constitutions then made: But being
afterwards obliged to go to Ireland to suppress a Rebellion
there, the People took Advantage of it, and dethron'd him.
'The Nation had such a Specimen in this Reign of a
Standing Army, that I don't find any King from his Time
to that of Charles the First, who attempted to keep up any
Forces in Time of Peace, except the Yeomen of the Guard,
who were constituted by Henry the Seventh. And tho'
there were several Armies rais'd in that Time for French,
Scotch, Irish, and other foreign and domestick Wars; yet
they were constantly disbanded as soon as the Occasion was
over. And in all the Wars of York and Lancaster, whatever Party prevail'd, we don't find they ever attempted to
keep up a Standing Army. Such was the Virtue of those
Times, that they would rather run the Hazard of forfeiting
their Heads and Estates to the Rage of the opposite Party,
than certainly enslave their Country, though they themselves
were to be the Tyrants.
'Nor would they suffer our Kings to keep up an Army
in Ireland, tho' there were frequent Rebellions there, and
by that Means their Subjection very precarious; as well
knowing they would soon be in England if call'd for. In
the first three Hundred Years that the English had Possession
of that Country, there were no Armies there but in the
Times of War. The first Force that was establish'd, was
in the 14th of Edward the Fourth, when one Hundred and
twenty Archers on Horseback, Forty Horsemen, and Forty
Pages, were establish'd by Parliament there; which six Years
after were reduced to Eighty Archers and Twenty Spearmen
on Horseback. Afterwards, in Henry the Eighth's Time,
in the Year 1535, the Army in Ireland was three Hundred; and in 1543, they were increased to three Hundred
and Eighty Horse, and sixteen Hundred Foot, which was
the Establishment then. I speak this of Times of Peace;
for when the Irish were in Rebellion, which was very frequent, the Armies were much more considerable. In Queen
Mary's Days the Standing Forces were about twelve Hundred. In most of Queen Elizabeth's Time the Irish were
in open Rebellion; but when they were all suppress'd, the
Army establish'd was between fifteen Hundred and two
Thousand; about which Number they continu'd till the
Army rais'd by Lord Strafford, in the 15th of Charles the
First.
'Our thrice happy Situation defends us from the Necessity of a Standing Army, which the Indiscretion of
some of our Neighbouring Nations have permitted, to the
Destruction of their Liberty. Besides, lying open to continual Invasion, they can never enjoy Quiet and Security,
nor take a sound Sleep, but Hercules like with Clubs in
their Hands. So that the Halcyon Days which we for the
most Part enjoy, must be solely attributed to our Tutelar
God Neptune, who with a Guard of winged Coursers so
strongly intrenches us, that we may be said to be media insuperabilis unda, and not unfitly compared to the Earth,
which stands fixed and immoveable, and never to be shaken,
but by an internal Convulsion. And yet we have much
Talk of a Standing Army which is to be in Time of Peace,
but no Body can tell us what they are to do: We know
their usual Commission is to kill and slay, but where now
is the Enemy? Many talk of this with as much Certainty,
as if they were already established, and are pleased to affirm it necessary to have a vast Body of Forces continued
on Foot. Whereas the first Project we find for a Standing
Army, in the Year 1629, required only three thousand
Foot in constant Pay, which were to bridle the Impertinence of Parliaments, and to over-run the Nation, to make
Edicts to be Laws, to force upon the People vast Numbers of
Excises; and, in short, to overturn the whole Frame of
this noble British Government.
'I wonder whose Advocates those Men are, who talk
so warmly of this Matter; for I am satisfy'd none of those
brave Britons, who have fought honourably for their Country, ever meant, when the Service was over, to be a Charge,
Burden and Terror at home; nor to disfranchise us of two
of our Native Liberties, Freedom from Martial Laws, and
Billeting of Soldiers; and thereby directly to take away
from themselves, as well as from their Fellow-Subjects,
one Half of the Benefit of the Petition of Right, and in
Consequence the other Half too, the Fredom of their Persons and Estates. Neither can it be supposed a gratifying
of his Majesty, to establish greater Forces than have been
usual in former Reigns in Times of Peace. His Majesty
has shewed and expressed so much Tenderness and Concern
for the Liberties and Ease of his Subjects, and even, when
the Necessity of the State seemed to require it, was so very
cautious in the Use of that Power invested in him by the
Parliament, with respect to the raising of Forces for the
Defence of the Kingdom and the Suppressing of the late Rebellion, that every Body admired his wonderful Resolution,
in trusting his Royal Life and Crown to so inconsiderable
a Number of Troops, in the most dangerous Juncture which
threatened both. How then can it be imagined that His
Majesty inclines to continue a Burden upon his Subjects,
which he was so loath to impose when the greatest Exigences
of State called for it? But there are some Gentlemen, who
a few Years since were the pretended Patriots of their Country, who had nothing in their Mouths but the sacred Name
of Liberty, who in the late Reigns could hardly afford the
Monarch the Prerogative that was due to him, and which
was absolutely necessary to put in Motion this Machine
of our Government, and to make the Springs and Wheels
of it act naturally and perform their Function; I say, these
Gentlemen, that in some former Reigns could not with Patience hear of the King's ordinary Guards, can now discourse familiarly of thirty thousand Men to be maintained
in Time of Peace. But let them not deceive themselves, for
supposing they vainly think to make their Court this Way,
yet they would quickly find themselves out-flattered by the
Party they fear, who have been long the Darling of Arbitrary Power, and whose Principles as well as Practices
teach them to be Enemies to all the legal Rights and just
Liberties of their Native Country; and so these wretched
Bunglers would be made use of only to bring together the
Materials of Tyranny, and then must give Place to more
expert Architects to finish the Building.
'And tho' we are secure from any Attempts of this
Kind during the Reign of a Prince, who preserves us from
a Captivity that would be equal to what Moses redeemed
the People of Israel from; a Prince whose Life is so necessary to the Preservation of Europe, that both Protestant and
Popish Princes have forgot their ancient Maxims, and laid
aside their innate Animosities, and made it their common
Interest to chuse him their Arbitrator: A Prince in whom
we know no Vice, but what has been esteemed a Virtue in
others, his undeserved Clemency to his Enemies. I say,
was this most excellent Prince to be immortal, we ought
in Prudence to abandon all Thoughts of Self Preservation,
and wholly to rely on his Care and Conduct. Or had
we as certain a Prospect of the Nation's being perpetually
blessed with Monarchs, that shall inherit his Royal Virtues as well as Kingdoms, as we have in the next immediate Heir, his Royal Highness the Prince of Wales, there
were no great Occasion or Necessity of appearing anxious for
the future Welfare of our Country, more than for the
present: But since no Virtue nor Pitch of Glory will exempt these Princes from paying the common Debt to Nature; we ought not to intrust any Power with them which
we do not think proper to be continued to their Successors.
And doubtless his Majesty will not regret this, or any
Thing else that can reasonably be required, in order to compleat that Deliverance, and Happiness of his People, so far
advanced by his wonderful Conduct. For to set us within
View of the promised Land, with a ne plus ultra, is the
greatest of all human Infelicities; and such I shall always
take our Case to be, whilst a Standing Army must be kept
up to prey upon our Entrails, and which must in the Hands
of an ill Prince (which we have had the Misfortune frequently to meet with) infallibly destroy our Constitution.
'And this is so evident and important a Truth, that no
Legislator ever founded a free Government, but avoided
this Charibdis, as a Rock against which his Commonwealth
must certainly be shipwrack'd, as the Israelites, Athenians,
Corinthians, Achaians, Lacedemonians, Thebans, Samnites
and Romans; none of which Nations, whilst they kept
their Liberty, were ever known to maintain any Soldier in
constant Pay within their Cities, or ever suffer'd any of their
Subjects to make War their Profession; well knowing that
the Sword and Sovereignty always march Hand in Hand;
and therefore they train'd their own Citizens, and Territories about them, perpetually in Arms; and their whole
Commonwealths, by this Means, became so many form'd
Militia's: A general Exercise of the best of their People in
the Use of Arms, was the only Bulwark of their Liberties;
this was reckon'd the surest Way to preserve them both at
Home and Abroad, the People being secur'd thereby as
well against the Domestick Affronts of any of their own Citizens, as against the Foreign Invasions of ambitious and
unruly Neighbours. Their Arms were never lodg'd in the
Hands of any who had not an Interest in preserving the publick Peace, who fought pro aris & focis, and thought
themselves sufficiently paid by repelling Invaders, that they
might with Freedom return to their own Affairs. In those
Days there was no Difference between the Citizen, the Soldier, and the Husbandman; for all promiscuously took Arms
when the publick Safety requir'd it, and afterwards laid
them down with more Alacrity than they took them up:
So that we find among the Romans, the best and bravest of
their Generals came from the Plough, contentedly returning
when the Work was over, and never demanding their Triumphs, till they had laid down their Commands, and reduc'd themselves to the State of private Men. Nor do we
find this famous Commonwealth ever permitted a Deposition
of their Arms in any other Hands, till their Empire increasing, Necessity constrain'd them to erect a constant Stipendiary Soldiery Abroad in Foreign Parts, either for the holding or winning of Provinces. Then Luxury increasing with
Dominion, the strict Rule and Discipline of Freedom soon
abated, and Forces were kept up at Home, which soon
prov'd of such dangerous Consequence, that the People
were forc'd to make a Law to employ them at a convenient
Distance; which was, that if any General march'd over
the River Rubicon, he should be declared a publick Enemy.
And in the Passage of that River, this following Inscription
was erected; Imperator five Miles, five Tyrannus armatus
quisquis sistito; vexillum armaque deponito, nec citra hunc
amnem trajicito. And this made Cæsar, when he had presum'd to pass this River, to think of nothing but the
pressing on to the total Oppression of that glorious Empire.
'Nor did any Nation deviate from these Rules but they lost
their Liberty; and of this Kind there are infinite Examples.
'The Story of Denmark is so very well known, and so
well related by an excellent Author [Lord Molesworth]
that it would be Impertinence in me to repeat it; only
this I will observe, that if the King had not had an Army
at his Command, the Nobles had never delivered up their
Government.
'Our Countryman Oliver Cromwell turned out the Parliament under which he serv'd; and this he effected by the
Assistance of an Army.
'Some People object, that the Republicks of Venice and
Holland are Instances to disprove my Assertion, who both
keep great Armies, and yet have not lost their Liberty. To
this I answer, that neither keep any Standing Forces within
the Seats of their Government, that is, within the City of
Venice, or the great Towns of the United Provinces; but
they defend these by their own Burghers, and quarter their
Mercenaries in their conquer'd Countries, viz. the Venetians in Greece, and the Continent of Italy, and the Dutch
in Flanders. And the Situation of these States makes their
Armies, so posted, not dangerous to them; for the Venetians cannot be attack'd without a Fleet, nor the Dutch
be ever conquer'd by their own Forces, their Country being
so full of strong Towns, fortify'd both by Art and Nature,
and defended by their own Citizens, that it would be a
fruitless Attempt for their own Armies to invade them; for
if they should march against any of their Cities, 'tis but
shutting up their Gates, and the Design is spoil'd.
'I would not here be mistaken, as if I advanced any Argument against the Quartering of Guards in and about the City
of London; for these being appointed for the Defence and
Guard of the King and Royal Family, are obliged to be posted
in all such Places wherever the Court resides. Neither do I
object against the maintaining of a competent Number of
Troops, such as have been allowed our former Kings to be kept
in Pay in Times of Peace: But that an Army of thirty Thousand Men should now in a profound Peace be kept standing,
is what no honest Man or Lover of his Country will venture
to affirm. And to return the last Objection, tho' we should
admit, that an Army might be consistent with Freedom in a
Commonwealth, yet it is otherwise in a free Monarchy;
for in the former, 'tis wholly in the Disposal of the People,
who nominate, appoint, discard, and punish the Generals
and Officers as they think fit, and 'tis certain Death to make
any Attempt upon their Liberties; whereas in the latter,
the King is perpetual General, may model the Army as he
pleases, and it will be call'd High-Treason to oppose him.
'This Subject is so self-evident, that I am almost asham'd
to prove it; for if we look through the World, we shall
find in no Country, Liberty and an Army stand together;
so that to know whether a People are Free or Slaves, it is
necessary only to ask, Whether there it an Army kept amongst them? This Truth is so obvious, that the most barefac'd Advocates for an Army do not directly deny it, but
qualify the Matter by telling us, that a Number not exceeding twenty or thirty Thousand are a Handful to so populous a Nation as this. Now I think that Number may
bring as certain Ruin upon us, as if they were as many
Millions, and I will give my Reasons for it.
'It's the Misfortune of all Countries, that they sometimes lie under an unhappy Necessity to defend themselves
by Arms against the Ambition of their Governors, and to
fight for what's their own; for if a Prince will rule us with
a Rod of Iron, and invade our Laws and Liberties, and
neither be prevail'd upon by our Miseries, Supplications, or
Tears, we have no Power upon Earth to appeal to, and
therefore must patiently submit to our Bondage, or stand
upon our own Defence; which if we are enabled to do,
we shall never be put upon it, but our Swords may grow
rusty in our Hands; for that Nation is surest to live in
Peace, that is most capable of making War; and a Man
that hath a Sword by his Side, shall have least Occasion to
make use of it. Now, I say, if a King hath thirty Thousand Men beforehand with his Subjects, the People can make
no Effort to defend their Liberties, without the Assistance of
a foreign Power, which is a Remedy most commonly as bad
as the Disease; and if we have not a Power within our
selves to defend our Laws, we are no Government.
'For England being a small Country, few strong Towns
in it, and those in the King's Hands, the Nobility disarm'd
by the Destruction of Tenures, and the Militia not to be
rais'd but by the King's Command, there can be no Force
levied in any Part of England, but must be destroy'd in its
Infancy by a few Regiments; for what will twenty or thirty Thousand naked unarm'd Men signify against as many
Troops of mercenary Soldiers? What if they should come
into the Field, and say, You must chuse these and these Men
your Representatives, Where is your Choice? What if they
should say, Parliaments are seditious and factious Assemblies,
and therefore ought to be abolish'd; What is become of
your Freedom? If they should encompass this House, and
threaten if they do not surrender up their Government, they
will put them to the Sword; What is become of your Constitution? These Things may be under a tyrannical Prince,
and have been done in several Parts of the World. What
is it that causeth the Tyranny of the Turks at this Day,
but Servants in Arms? What is it that preserv'd the glorious Commonwealth of Rome, but Swords in the Hands of
its Citizens?
'I will add here, that most Nations were enslav'd by
small Armies: Oliver Cromwel left behind him but twenty
seven Thousand Men; and the Duke of Monmouth, who
was the Darling of the People, was suppress'd with two
Thousand; nay, Cæsar seiz'd Rome it self with five Thousand, and fought the Battle of Pharsalia, where the Fate
of the World was decided, with twenty-two Thousand:
And most of the Revolutions of the Roman and Ottoman
Empires since were caus'd by the Pretorian Bands, and the
Court Janezaries; the former of which never exceeded
Eight, nor the latter twelve Thousand Men. And if no
greater Numbers could make such Disturbances in those vast
Empires, what will double or triple the Force do with us?
And they themselves confess it, when they argue for an
Army; for they tell us, we may be surpriz'd with ten or
fifteen Thousand Men from France, and having no regular
Force to oppose them, they will over-run the Kingdom.
Now, if so small a Force can oppose the King, the Militia,
with the United Power of the Nobility, Gentry and Commons, what would an equal Power do against the People,
when supported by the Royal Authority and a never failing
Interest that will attend it, except when it acts for the publick Good?
'We are told, this Army is not design'd to be made a
Part of our Constitution, but to be kept only for a little
Time, till the Circumstances of Europe, and of this Nation
in particular, will better permit us to be without them. But
I would know of these Gentlemen, when they think that
Time will be, if it is not now? We are at present not only
at Peace with all our Neighbours, but are also ty'd in the
firmest Alliance with France, formerly our most formidable
Enemy: Shall we have less to fear from the Pretender to
the Crown and his Friends at any Time hereafter, than at
this present Time? Or, are we apprehensive, lest France will
keep Treaties with us no longer than is consistent with her
own Interest? Or, that she will be more capable of offending
us just after the late tedious and consumptive War, than
many Years hereafter when she has had a Breathing-Time
to repair the Calamities she has suffer'd by it? No; we
can never disband our Army with so much Safety as at this
Time; and this is well known by those Advocates for them,
who are satisfy'd that a Continuation of them now, is an
Establishment of them for ever: For whilst the Circumstances of Europe stand in the present Posture, the Argument
will be equal to continue them; if the State of Europe
should alter to the Advantage of France, the Reason will
grow stronger, and we shall be told, we must increase our
Number. But if there should be such a Turn of Affairs in
the World, that we were no longer in Apprehension of the
French Power, they may be kept up without our Assistance;
nay, the very Discontents they may create, shall be made
an Argument for the continuing of them. But if they should
be kept from oppressing the People, in a little Time they
would grow habitual to us, and almost become a Part of our
Constitution, and by Degrees we shall be brought to believe
them not only not dangerous, but necessary: For every Body
sees, but few understand: And those few will never be able
to persuade the Multitude that there is any Danger in those
Men they have liv'd quietly with for some Years, especially
when the disbanding them will (as they will be made believe) cost them more Money out of their own Pockets than
to maintain a Militia.
'But we are told, that we need be in no Apprehension
of Slavery, whilst we keep the Power of the Purse in our
own Hands; which is very true; but they do not tell us,
that he has the Power of raising Money, to whom no one
dares refuse it. For 'tis as certain that an Army will raise
Money, as that Money will raise an Army; but if this
Course should be thought too desperate, 'tis only shutting up
the Exchequer, and disobliging a few Tally-Jobbers, who
have bought them for Fifty per Cent. Discount; and there
will be near three Millions a Year ready cut and dry'd for
them: And whoever doubts whether such a Method as this
is practicable, let him look back to the Reign of Charles
the Second.
'But when all other Arguments fail, they call to their
Assistance the old Tyrant Necessity, and tell us the Power
of France is so great, and Treaties are of so little Force
with that prefidious Nation, that let the Consequence of an
Army be what it will, we cannot be without one; and if
we must be Slaves, we had better be so to a Protestant Prince
than a Popish one, and the worst of all Popish ones, one
under the Direction of France. Now I am of Opinion, that
the putting an Epithet upon Tyranny is false Heraldry; for
Protestant and Popish are both alike; and if I must be a
Slave, it is very indifferent to me who is my Master; and
therefore I shall never consent to be rul'd by an Army,
which is the worst that the most barbarous Conquest can
impose upon me; which notwithstanding we have little
Reason to fear, whilst we keep the Seas well guarded.
'It is certain there is no Country so situated for Naval
Power as Great Britain. The Sea is our Element, our Seamen have as much hardy Bravery, and our Ships are as
numerous, and built of as good Materials as any in the
World: Such a Force well apply'd and manag'd, is able to
give Laws to the Universe; and if we keep a competent
Part of it well arm'd in Times of Peace, it is the most ridiculous Thing in Nature, to believe any Prince will have
Thoughts of invading us, unless he proposes to be superior
to us in Naval Power. For the Preparations necessary for
such an Undertaking will alarm all Europe, give both to us
and our Confederates Time to arm, and put our selves in a
Posture of Defence. And whoever considers, that the Prince
of Orange with six Hundred Ships brought but fourteen
Thousand Men, and the mighty Spanish Armado, then the
Terror of the World, imbark'd but eighteen Thousand,
will be assur'd, that no Invasion can be so sudden upon us,
but we shall have Time to get ready our whole Fleet, bring
some Forces from Ireland, and prepare our own Militia if
there shall be Occasion for it; especially in Times of Peace,
when we shall have the Liberty of all the Ports of France,
and shall or may have Intelligence from every one of them.
'But they tell us such a Wind may happen as may be
favourable to our Enemy, and keep us within our Ports;
which, I say, as France lies to England, is almost impossible: For if we lie about Falmouth, or the Land's-End,
no Fleet from Brest or the Ocean can escape us without a
Miracle; and if the Design be to invade us from any Port
in the Channel, a very few Ships, which may safely lie at
Anchor, will certainly prevent it. Nor is it to be conceiv'd, that the French will be at a vast Expence for the
Contingency of such a critical Wind, or will send an Army
into a Country where their Retreat is certainly cut off, when
the failing of any Part of their Design will bring a new
War upon them.
'And here I must consess, that the Misapplication of our
Naval Force, which is our known Strength, for these several
Years past, is the strongest, as it is the most usual Argument against me; which unriddles a Mystery I did not understand before, tho' I never was so foolish as to believe all
the Errors of that Kind were the Effects of Chance or Ignorance, or that losing so many Opportunities of destroying
the French Fleet had not some extraordinary, tho' occult
Cause; and yet notwithstanding the restless Attempts of our
Enemies, and the paltry Politicks, and even Treachery of
some preceeding Ministers, this Fleet triumphantly defended
us, so that our Enemies in many Years War could not get
an Opportunity of invading our Country.
'It is objected, that the Officers of our Fleet may be
corrupted, or that a Storm may arise, which may destroy
it all at once, and therefore we ought to have two Strings
to our Bow. By which I perceive all their Fears lie one
Way, and that they do not care, if they precipitate us into
inevitable Ruin at Home, to prevent a distant Possibility of
it from France. But I think this Phantom too may be laid
by a well-trained Militia, and then all their Bugbears will
vanish. This Word can be no sooner out, but there's a
Volly of Small Shot let fly at me: What! must we trust
our Safety to an undisciplin'd Mob, who never dream'd of
fighting when they undertook the Service; who are not
inur'd to the Fatigue of a Camp, or ever saw the Face of
an Enemy? And then they magnify mercenary Troops; as
if there was an intrinsick Virtue in a red Coat, or that a
Raggamussin from Robbing a Henroost, in two Campaigns,
could be cudgell'd into a Hero. Tho' I must confess the
Conduct of the Advocates for a Standing Army industriously
enervating this Force, does in some Measure justify their
Objections: For the detestable Policies of the Reigns of
King Charles the Second and his immediate Successor, were
with the utmost Art and Application to disarm the People,
and make the Militia useless, to countenance a Standing
Army in order to bring in Popery and Slavery; and if any
Methods were propos'd to make it more serviceable, the
Court would never suffer them to be debated; and such
Officers as were more zealous in Exercising their Companies
than others, were reprimanded, as designing to raise a Rebellion. This Conduct was exactly imitated in the latter
Part of Queen Anne's Reign, when the Militia of England
was neglected and discountenanc'd, and that of Scotland attempted to be reduc'd to the Standard in England, by which
Means that Force would have been render'd entirely useless
in that Part of the Kingdom, the first Scene where the Enemy was to act the designed bloody Tragedy; and when the
Army itself was daily more and more reform'd and modell'd
to their Purpose of bringing in the Pretender.
'And now it seems some Men in this Reign are taking
the Advantage of this traiterous Neglect and infamous Politicks, of those we just now mention'd. But why may not
a Militia be made useful? Why may not the Nobility,
Gentry, and Freeholders of England be trusted with the
Defence of their own Lives, Estates, and Liberties, without
having Guardians and Keepers assign'd them? And why may
they not defend these with as much Vigour and Courage as
Mercenaries who have nothing to lose, nor any other Tie to
engage their Fidelity, than the inconsiderable Sixpence a
Day, which they may have from the Conqueror?
'Why may not a competent Number of Firelocks be
kept in every Parish for the young Men to exercise with on
Holy-days, and Rewards offer'd to the most expert, to stir
up their Emulation?
'Why may not a Third Part of the Militia be kept by
Turns in constant Exercise?
'Why may not a Man be listed in the Militia, till he be
discharged by his Master, as well as in the Army, till he be
discharged by his Captain? And why may not the same
Horse be always sent forth, unless it can be made appear,
he is dead or maimed?
'Why may not the private Soldiers of the Army, when
they are dispersed in the several Parts of the Kingdom, be
sent to the Militia? And why may not the inferior Officers
of the Army in some Proportion command them?
'I say, these and other like Things may be done, and
some of them are done in our own Plantations, and the
Islands of Jersy and Guernsey; as also in Poland, Switzerland, and the Country of the Grisons, which are Nations
much less considerable than England, have as formidable
Neighbours, no Seas nor Fleet to desend them, nothing but
a Militia to depend upon, and yet no one dares attack
them. And we have seen as great Performances done formerly by the Apprentices of London, and in the War by
the Vaudois in Savoy, the Miquelets in Catalonia, and the
Militia in Ireland, as can be paralleled in History. And
so it would be with us, if the Court would give their hearty
Assistance in promoting this Design; if the King would appear in Person at the Head of them, and give Rewards
and Honours to such as deserve them, we should quickly see the young Nobility and Gentry appear magnificently in Arms and Equipage, shew a generous Emulation in
outvying one another in military Exercises, and place a
noble Ambition in making themselves serviceable to their
Country.
'They object, that such a Militia as this is a Standing
Army, and will be as dangerous, and much more chargeable. I answer,
'That there can be no Danger from an Army, where
the Nobility and Gentry of England are the Commanders,
and the Body of it made up of the Freeholders, their Sons
and Servants; unless we can conceive that the Nobility and
Gentry will join in an unnatural Design to make void their
own Tides to their Estates and Liberties; and if they could
entertain so ridiculous a Proposition, they would never be
obeyed by the Soldiers, who will have a Respect to those
that send them forth and pay them, and to whom they must
return again when their Time is expired. For if I send a
Man, I will as surely chuse one who will fight for me, as
a mercenary Officer will chuse one that shall fight for me:
And the Governments of King Charles the Second, and
King James, are Witnesses to the Truth of this, who debauched the Militia more than ever I hope to see it again,
and yet durst never rely upon them to assist their arbitrary
Designs; as we may remember at the Duke of Monmouth's
Invasions their Officers durst not bring them near his Army
for fear of a Revolt. Nay, the Pensioner-Parliament themselves turned short upon the Court, when they expected to
give them the finishing Stroke to our Ruin.
'To the last Part of the Objection, That this Militia
will be more chargeable than an Army; I answer, That
since no Man proposes wholly to lay them aside, if we add
the extraordinary Expence of maintaining twenty thousand
Men to the ordinary Charge of the Militia, it is much more
than sufficient to make the latter useful. But if this Objection were true, it ought not to enter into Competition with
the Preservation of our Laws and Liberties; for it is betterto give a third Part of my Estate, if it were necessary, than to
have all taken from me.
'And tho' it should be granted, that a Militia is not as
serviceable as an Army kept in constant Discipline, yet I
believe these Gentlemen themselves will confess, sixty thousand of them trained as before, are as good as twenty thousand of their standing Troops, which is the Question; for
it is impossible to have them both used at the same Time,
they being as incompatible as broad and clipt Money,
never current together; and therefore the Kingdom must
depend wholly upon a Militia, or else it will not depend
upon them at all.
'And this by the Way may silence that Objection, that
we must keep our Army 'till the Militia be disciplined;
for that will never be done whilst the Court has an Army;
and the same Objection will be made seven Years hence
as now; so that even a small Army can be of no Use to us,
but to make our Fleet neglected, to hinder the Militia
from being trained, and enslave us at Home; for they are
too few to defend us against an Invasion, and too many
for the People to oppose.
'My Lord Bacon in several Places bears his Testimony
against a Standing Army, and particularly he tells us, that
a mercenary Army is fittest to invade a Country, but a Militia to defend it; because the first have Estates to get, and
the latter to protect.
'I believe no Author ever treated of a Free Government, that did not express his Abhorrence of an Army;
for, as my Lord Bacon says, whoever does use them,
tho' he may spread his Feathers for a Time, he will mew
them soon after.
'Perhaps it will be said, that the Artillery of the World
is changed since some of those wrote, and War is become
more a Mystery, and therefore more Experience is necessary to make good Soldiers. But wherein does this Mystery
consist? Not in exercising a Company, and obeying a few
Words of Command; these are Mysteries that the dullest
Noddle will comprehend in a few Weeks. Nay, I have
heard that the Modern Exercise is much shorter and easier
than the Ancient. But the great Improvements in War, are
in regular Encampments, Fortification, Gunnery, skilful
Engineering, &c. These are Arts not to be learned without
much Labour and Experience, and are as much gained in
the Closet as in the Field; and I suppose, no Man will
say, that the keeping Standing Forces is necessary to make
a good Engineer.
'As to actual Experience in War, that is not essential
either to a Standing Army or Militia, as such; but the
former may be without it, and the latter gain it according
as they have Opportunities of Action. 'Tis true at present the Army hath been trained up in long Wars, and
hath gained great Knowledge: But these Men will not be
lost when they are disbanded, they will be still in the Kingdom; and if the Parliament does give them a Gratuity suitable to the Service they have done their Country, they
will be ready to resume their Arms whenever Occasion
offers.
'I conclude this Subject of the Militia with this Observation, that a Standing Army in Peace will grow more effeminate by living dissolutely in Quarters, than a Militia
that for the most Part will be exercised with hard Labour:
So that upon the whole Matter, a Standing Army in Peace
will be worse than a Militia, and in War a Militia will soon
become a disciplined Army.
'But I desire to know of these Gentlemen, how comes
an Army necessary to our Preservation now, and never since
the Conquest before in Times of Peace? Did ever the prevailing Party in the Wars of York and Lancaster, as I observed before, attempt to keep up a Standing Army to support themselves? No: they had more Sense than to sacrifice their own Liberty, and more Honour than to enslave
their Country, the more easily to carry on their own Faction. Were not the Spaniards as powerful, as good Soldiers,
and as much our Enemies as the French lately were? Was
not Flanders as near us as France? And the Popish Interest
in Queen Elizabeth's Time as strong as the Jacobite is now?
And yet that most excellent Princess never dreamed of a
Standing Army; but thought her surest Empire was to reign
in the Hearts of her Subjects, which the following Story
sufficiently testifies. When the Duke of Alanson came over
to England, and for some Time had admired the Riches
of the City, the Conduct of her Government, and the Magnificence of her Court; he asked her amidst so much Splendor, where were her Guards? Which Question she resolved
a few Days after, when she took him in her Coach through
the City, and pointing to the People (who received her in
Crowds, with Acclamations) 'These, said she, my Lord,
are my Guards; these have their Hands, their Hearts,
and their Purses always ready at my Command. And
these were Guards indeed, who defended her through a
long and successful Reign of fort four Years, against all
the Machinations of Rome, the Power of Spain, a disputed
Title, and the perpetual Conspiracies of her own Popish
Subjects; a Security the Roman Emperors could not boast
of with their Pretorian Bands, and their Eastern and Western
Armies.
'Were not the French as powerful in Charles the Second and King James's Time, as they are now, after the
long and destructive Wars wherein they have been since
engaged? And yet we then thought a much less Army than
is now contended for, a most insupportable Grievance; insomuch that in Charles the Second's Reign, the Grand Jury presented them, and the Pensioner-Parliament voted them
to be a Nusance; sent Sir J. Williamson to the Tower, for
saying, 'The King might keep Guards for the Defence of
'his Person,' and addressed to have them disbanded. And
now, which is strange to think, some Gentlemen would
make their Court, by doing what the worst of Parliaments
could not think of without Horror and Confusion.
'They say, the King of France was in League with our
late Kings, so France is with us; and they would have
broke it then, if they had thought it safe, and for their Interest as much as now. But they add, we have more disaffected Persons to join with them; which I must deny,
for I believe his present Majesty hath deservedly as much
Interest as any of his Prodecessors; and if during the latter
Part of the late Reign, when the Interest of the Pretender
was so much advanced by the Ministry itself, and the
Friends to his Majesty's Succession affronted and discouraged; if during the late formidable Rebellion, which was
raised to dethrone and murder his Majesty, and the whole
Royal Family, and to overturn the present Religion, Laws,
and Liberties of which he is the Defender and Protector;
I say, if at such dangerous Times he had so many Friends,
there can be no doubt but in Times of Peace, when the
People reap the Fruits of that Conduct he hath shewn in
their Defence, he will be the most beloved and glorious
Prince that ever filled the English Throne.
'I will assert farther, That the most likely Way of bringing in the Pretender, is maintaining a Standing Army to
keep him out.
'For the King's Safety stands upon a Rock, whilst it depends upon the solid Foundation of the Affections of his
People, which is never to be shaken 'till it is as evident as the
Sun is in the Firmament, that there is a new formed Design to overthrow our Laws and Liberties, which I think
we have no Reason to fear, when I reflect on the wise
Provisions his Majesty has made against any future Attempts
of that Kind: But if we keep a Standing Army, all depends upon the uncertain and capricious Humours of the
Soldiery, which in all Ages have produced more and violent sudden Revolutions, than ever have been known in any
unarmed Governments: For there is such a Chain of Dependance amongst them, that if Two or Three of the chief
Officers should be disobliged, or have Intreagues with Jacobite Mistresses; or if a King of France could once again
buy his Pensioners into the Court or Army, or offer a
better Market to some that are in already, we shall have
another Rehearsal Revolution, and the People be only idle
Spectators of their own Ruin.
'And whosoever considers the Composition of an Army,
and doubts this, let him look back to the Roman Empire,
where he will find out of Twenty Six Emperors, Sixteen
deposed and murdered by their own Armies. Nay, half
the History of the World is made up of Examples of
this Kind: But we need not go any farther than our own
Country, where we have twice kept Armies in Time of
Peace, and both Times they turned out their own Masters.
The first under Cromwel, expelled that Parliament under
which they had fought too successfully for many Years;
afterwards under General Monk, they destroyed the Government they before set up, and restored King Charles the
Second; and he afterwards disbanded them, lest they should
have conspired to exclude him again. The other Instance
is fresh in every one's Memory, how King James's Army
joined with the Prince of Orange, afterwards our rightful
and lawful King.
'And what could have been expected otherwise from
Men, who call themselves Soldiers of Fortune? who having
no other Profession or Substance to depend upon, are forced
to stir up the Ambition of Princes, and engage them in perpetual Quarrels, that they may share of the Spoils they
make? Such Men, like some Sort of ravenous Fish, fare best
in a Storm; and therefore we may reasonably suppose they
will be better pleased with a tyrannical Government, such
as was that of the late King James, than the mild and gracious Administration of his present Majesty.
'But farther, there is a Crisis in all Affairs, which when
once lost can never be retrived. Several Accidents concur
to make the Disbanding the Army practicable now, which
may not happen again: We have a loyal and uncorrupted
Parliament, and we have a Prince, whose Inclinations as
well as Circumstances will oblige him to comply with the
reasonable Desires of his People. But let us not flatter ourselves, this will be always so; for if the Army should be
continued, they may in Time be accounted Part of the Prerogative, and then it will be thought as great a Violation
to attempt the Disbanding them, as of the Guards in King
Charles the Second's Time; it will be interpreted a Design
to dethrone the King, and be made an Argument for the
keeping them up.
'But there are other Reasons yet: The Publick Necessities call upon us to contract our Charge, that we may
be the sooner out of Debt, and in a Condition to make a
new War if there is a Necessity for it: And 'tis not the
keeping great Armies on foot that will enable us to do so,
but putting ourselves in a Capacity to pay them. We should
put ourselves into such Circumstances, that our Enemies may
dread a new Quarrel, which can be no otherways done, but
by lessening our Expences, and paying off the publick Engagements as fast as we are able. For Money is the Sinews
of War; but the Sinews once weakened, the Body is in a
tottering Condition. A Standing Army must be fed, and
when once without Pay, must live upon free Quarter; for
there is no Reason that Men raised for the Service of their
Country, should starve in it.
'In this Discourse, I purposely omit speaking of the
lesser Inconveniencies attending a Standing Army, such as
frequent Quarrels, Murders and Robberies; the quartering
upon publick, and sometimes private Houses; the influencing Elections of Parliament by an artificial Distribution
of Quarters; the rendering so many Men useless to Labour; with a greater Destruction of them, by taking them
from a laborious Way of living to a loose idle Life; and
besides this, the Insolence and Debaucheries that are committed in all the Towns they come in, to the Ruin of Multitudes of Women, Dishonour of their Families, and ill example to others; and a numerous Train of Mischiefs besides, almost endless to enumerate.
'If the Parliament give the best King a Standing Army,
the worst King shall hereafter claim and have it.
'The Advocates for a Standing Army tell us, That
tho' the Words, 'By being annexed to the Crown, and so
becoming a Prerogative, could not be parted with, which
was the Cause of the long Continuance of that Mischief,
after it was known and felt to be so; yet all this is cur'd
by making the Act temporary, and settling a Standing Army only for a certain Number of Years.
'To this I answer, that succeeding Princes, if they find
an Army, will keep it, and will not trouble themselves whether the Law be temporary or perpetual. A plain Instance
we have of this in the Customs; for tho' Tunnage and Poundage, and the other Impositions, are a Subsidy and free Gift,
and the King's Answer to the Bill thanks the Subjects for
their good Will; and tho' Parliaments have alway us'd such
Cautions and Limitations in those Grants as might prevent
any Claim, and heretofore limited them to a short Time,
as for a Year or two; and if they were continued longer,
they have directed a certain Space of Cessation or Intermission, that so the Right of the Subject might be the more
evident; at other Times, they have been granted upon Occasion of War for a certain Number of Years, with Proviso,
that if the War were ended in the mean Time, then the
Grant should cease, and of Course they have been sequestered into the Hands of some Subjects for the guarding of the
Seas. Notwithstanding all this, tho' the Parliament so carefully granted their Grants, yet King Charles the First took
the Subsidy, without any Grant at all, for sixteen Years together; tho' several Parliaments in the mean Time forbad
the Payment of it, and voted all those to be publick Enenemies that did not refuse it. The like did his Son, the late
King James, 'till his Parliament gave it him: And in his
first Speech to them he demanded it as his own, by the
Name of, 'My Revenue;' and why then shall not another
Prince come and say the same, 'Give me my Army,' if he
ever have a Parliament to ask? To limit a Prince with Laws,
where there is an Army, is to bind Sampson with his
Locks on.
'In all Ages and Parts of the World, a Standing Army
has been the never failing Instrument of enslaving a Nation.
'The very Reputation of a Force to back them, will
make all Court Proposals speak big, tho' ever so contrary
to the Interest of the Nation; For there is no debating nor
disputing against Legions. It will tempt them to do many
Things they durst not otherways think of: What is much
out of our Reach, is rarely the Object of our Thoughts:
But the Facility of Execution is generally the first Motive to
an Attempt. Now 'tis abundantly the Interest of Court
Flatterers to live under a corrupt Reign: Then Bribes and
Confiscations fill their Coffers. No Man's Wife or Daughter is free from their Lust, or Estate from their Avarice.
They extort Presents from the Nobility, Goods from the
Tradesmen, and Labour from the Poor. In short, all is
their own. And 'tis to be feared, these Gentlemen, unless they have more Virtue than usually falls to their Share,
will put Princes upon such Councils as promote their own
Advantage. They will tell them, how mean it is to be
aw'd by a few Country Gentlemen, when all the Kings of
Europe besides are got out of Pupilage, as Lewis the Eleventh called it. They will fill their Heads with a thousand
trifling Jealousies of Monsters, Commonwealths, and such
like Bugbears: And it hath been difficult even for the
wisest of Princes to free themselves from this Sort of Cattle.
Nothing but the Fear of Punishment, and the being made a
Sacrifice to the Peoples just Revenge, can make such Men
honest. But if they have an Army to protect them, under
a tyrannical Prince, all these Considerations will be laid
aside, and all Arguments will be answered in a Word,
The King has an Army, which will cut off all Reply.
The King has an Army will be a confuting Answer to every Thing, but a better Army, which, Thanks be to God,
and the late King William, we once found at the happy Revolution. But as we are not to live upon Miracles, so we
are not to tempt Dangers.
'I have stay'd the longer upon this Point, in shewing
how inconsistent an Army, under a bad Prince I always
mean, is with the Freedom of Parliaments, because they
being the Keepers of our British Liberties can ill perform
that Office when they have parted with their Power into
other Hands. They are the last Resort of the Subject for
the Redress of their Grievances: But how shall they relieve others from the Oppression and Insolences or the Soldiery, when
perhaps they shall be subject to the like themselves? The
Projectors are aware of this terrible Inconvenience, and
therefore they have this Expedient, That it shall be the
King's Army, but the Parliament shall have the Paying of
them; whereby they shall in all future Times be as much
the Parliament's humble Servants, as the Parliament their
proper Masters.
'Much at one I believe: For the Long Parliament had
not such a King and Parliament Army as this, but an Army that was all their own; their Creatures, raised, listed,
commissioned, and paid wholly by themselves, and not in
Partnership, and that had manfully fought all their Battles:
And yet, upon the first Distaste they were pleased to take,
they distressed their own Masters, and with an high Hand
forced them to banish eleven of their principal Members,
Denzil Holles, Sir Philip Stapylton, Glyn and such other
great Men. Sir Philip Stapylton dyed in his Banishment.
At another Time they would not suffer near an hundred
Members to enter into the House, whom they thought not
well affected to the Business then it Hand: And at the same
Time evilly intreated and imprisoned about forty Members:
This they called Purging the House. After they had thus
handled them at several Times, in Conclusion, the Officers
came and reprimanded the House, bid them take away
their Fool's Bauble, the Mace, violently pulled the Speaker
out of the Chair, drove out the Members, and locked up
the Doors, and so Good Night to the Parliament. The
Wisdom of that Parliament was said to be very great by
their own Party, but it was Nonsense for them to think,
that an Army does not know its own Strength: For without dear bought Experience, any Body may know beforehand, what will be the natural Consequences of a Standing
Army, in the Case above supposed of a bad Prince, which
may possibly happen in some future Ages, tho' indeed we
have a long and glorious Prospect of a better Fate to these
Kingdoms. It will be the Conquest of the Nation in the
silentest, shortest and surest Way. They will be able to dispose of Men's Lives and Estates at Will and Pleasure; and
what can a foreign Conqueror do more? If after this the
Subjects live and possess any Thing, it will be because
they let them; and how long that shall be, no Body
knows.
'Nay, in many Respects an authorized Standing Army
may prove far worse than a foreign Invasion, and a Conquest from abroad: For there we have a Chance for it, but
this would be a Conquest in cold Blood, which might not
be resisted. And thus we should lose the inseparable Rights
of the Conquered, which is to rescue and deliver themselves,
and to throw off the Yoke as soon as they can.
'It would likewise be a great Aggravation of their Misery to be enslaved at their own Cost and Charges: Besides
the bitter Resentments of Unkindness and Breach of Trust,
if it be done by those who ought to protect us, and provide
better for us, at least should not leave us in a worse Condition than they found us. But above all, if we contribute
to this Thraldom by our Folly, Flattery and little self-seeking: If the Destruction of our Posterity be of ourselves,
that Reflection hereafter, when we come to foresee the bad
Consequences that are yet hid from the Advocates for a
Standing Army, will have a Sting in it; and it will not
then be enough to say, Who would have thought it?
'Governments have their Infancy, their Meridian, and
their Decay. But the Destruction of ours is more to be apprehended from ourselves than from a foreign Enemy.
'That unless we have an Army to lye Lieger, we are
liable to be over-run by a foreign enemy e'er we are aware,
is a Thought that could not possibly escape our Forefathers,
yet we cannot learn that ever they put it in Practice, which
is a great Sign they did not like it. No, we are well assured, that they would not have suffered a Standing Army
to defend the Nation, if they would have done it gratis.
'But what signify the Proceedings of former Ages to us
say some Gentlemen, the World is strangely altered, and
the Power of France is become so formidable, that it can
never be opposed in the Elizabeth Way. They still keep
up a great Army, and how shall we defend ourselves against
them, if they think fit to break Treaties with us, and assist the Pretender to invade us, without an Army of twenty
or thirty thousand disciplined Troops?
'But that we may for ever lay this Gobblin, we will admit our Fleets to be kidnapped by an unlucky Wind,
whilst the French land twenty thousand Men in our Country. Tho' in Gratitude for this Concession, I hope my
Adversaries will grant that their Fleet cannot get back
again without our meeting with them, since the same Wind
that carries them home will carry us out, or if they will
not be so good natured as to allow this, I will undertake
for them, for we live in an Undertaking Age, that they
will agree we shall intercept their Supplies. Then the Case
is thus, that twenty thousand Men, of which few can be
Horse, are landed in England without any human Possibility of being supply'd from abroad.
'I say, this Army shall never march twenty Miles into
the Country, for they cannot put themselves in a marching
Posture in less than a Fortnight or three Weeks; and by
that Time we may have an hundred thousand Militia drawn
down upon them, whereof ten thousand shall be Horse, and
as many Dragoons as we please: And if this Militia does
nothing else but drive the Country, cut off their Foragers and Straglers, possess themselves of the Defiles, and
intercept Provisions, their Army must be destroyed in a
small Time. Neither will domestick Enemies, the Favourers of the Pretender, be able in the mean Time to give
us much Disturbance; for by the prudent Care the present
Government has already taken, and 'tis hoped will take for
the future, these Malecontents can never be in a Condition
to make any Head, or contribute the least Assistance to a
foreign Enemy.
'Of this Kind I could give many Instances out of History; but I will give you a late one out of Ireland.
'First, I think it will be readily agreed, that there are
ten Men in England for one in Ireland.
'Secondly, That King William had more English and
Scots to join with him in Ireland than there are Malecontents in England.
Thirdly, That our Militia have as much Courage as the
Irish: And yet, tho' we had eight thousand Horse, and above thirty thousand Foot in Ireland, and a great Part of
of the Country in our Possession, we were more than four
Years in conquering the rest, and almost a Miracle we did
it then. And I believe no Man will deny, if we could
not have supply'd our Army from England, but they had
all there perished; such is the Advantage of fighting upon
one's own Dunghil.
'And to shew what Treatment the French would be
like to meet with in England, I will put you in mind of
the Purbeck Invasion, which was so private, that it was
seen only by an old Man and a Boy: And yet tho' the
Country thought the Government against them, we had above forty thousand Voluntiers in Arms in two or three
Days time, who came thither on their own Accord to give
them the Meeting; and if they had been there, I doubt
not would have given a good Account of them. Our
Court, when it was over, shewed their Dislike of it, and
questioned the Sheriff of Dorsetshire about it. And tho'
we have forgot it, yet I believe the French will remember
Purbeck; for it shewed the true Spirit and Genius of the
English Nation.
'But the Policy of France having now assumed a quite
different Face since the Death of Lewis their late King,
whose aspiring Temper gave so much Uneasiness to all
Europe, all Arguments and Pretences for a Standing Army, that are drawn from any Views of a Breach with
that Kingdom, are intirely cut off by this one Consideration.
'Indeed, most of the Reasons these Gentlemen advance
to enforce their Design, (and which without this additional
Confutation, we have already sufficiently repelled) as they
were chiefly made use of by the same Set of Men, in the
Reign of the late King William, when the Nation with
one Voice, as it were, declared for the disbanding of the
Army after the Peace; so the Circumstances of those Times
added a great deal of Weight to the same, and the Dispute on both Sides was then managed with so much
Strength of Argument, as well as Wit and Art, that it was
not an easy Matter for the best Judgment to decide the
Case justly, so as neither the Safety of the Nation, or the
Liberties and Ease of the People from heavy Taxes might
suffer by it.
'And yet, notwithstanding all the seeming ballancing
Difficulties that were then obvious from the reducing the
Forces, the Wisdom of the King and his Parliament thought
fit to over-rule the Matter, and to give their Determination on the other Side. So that allowing the Projectors Arguments to carry with them the same Force and Energy
now that the same had then, yet they ought in good Manners to yield up the Cause, because after the most obstinate,
nice, and subtile Controversy and Debate by the wisest
Heads of the Nation, the most impartial Decision of a Parliament has given their Authority against them.
'But will any Man pretend to affirm, that an Argument relating to the Policy of a Commonwealth, is at all
Times supported with equal Reason and Necessity? What
Absurdities and Contradictions must needs be the Consequences of such a ridiculous Assertion?
'It may be averred with the like Parity of Reason, that
our Monarchs ought always to keep Garrisons in most of
the Cities, Towns and Castles of England, because William
the Conqueror found it absoluely necessary to do so, for
the securing of his new-gained Kingdom. No: there is
nothing within the Compass of State Policy that is not as
changeable as the Weather and the Seasons of the Year,
and those Alterations are as necessary to the Preservation of
the political Oeconomy, as these are to the Body Natural:
And there is nothing unalterable in the Nature of a Government, but that which is its very Essence, the fundamental
Laws of its Constitution, which cannot be changed or removed without the Overthrow and Destruction of the whole
Building.
'Now as to the particular Point in Debate. We are to
consider the French Affairs and Circumstances in a quite different Light, at present, from the Appearances these had in
the Reign last mentioned.
'It is true, King William did not a little contribute by
his heroick Courage and Conduct, to humble the Pride of
that common Enemy of Europe, who aimed at no less than
an universal Conquest; but the victorious Confederate Army in the last War, had brought him even to the Brink
of Ruin, and would certainly have disabled that State from
even a Possibility of raising its Head, or of giving any Annoyance to his Neighbours, had not our Ministry of the
late Reign been too easily circumvented and bribed by
French Policy and French Gold, to make a most inglorious
and dishonourable Peace with that Nation.
'However, the dismal Effects of the late War sat so heavy upon them, that these were a Clog and Hinderance to
all that King's ambitious Projects and Designs, who was
content to hold what he had preserved from a raging, unfortunate and destructive War, without running the Hazard of any future Attempts.
'But besides the miserable State of that Kingdom, occasioned by the War, we are presented with an entire new
Prospect of their Affairs since that King's Death; and they
have their Hands too full at Home, to be meddling with
their Neighbours. Every Body knows what domestick
Heats and Quarrels they have among themselves at present,
by which they are brewing a great deal of Mischief to the
whole Kingdom, and which must necessarily determine in
the Destruction of one of the Parties. The Affair of the
Succession to the Crown of France, about which great
Part of that Kingdom is already divided against the other,
may produce as much Noise, Wars and Bloodshed as did
lately that of Spain: And Great Britain being likely to
have a considerable Share, some Time or other, in deciding
the former as well as it had in the latter, which was the
Ground of the late War, it is the Interest of both Kingdoms to carry fair with us. But it being stipulated as one
of the grand Conditions and Articles of the Peace that
Philip should renounce his Pretensions to the French Crown,
and he having accordingly solemnly done so, it is evident
whom we are to side with, if the Matter should come to
be disputed. And this is the Foundation of the tripartite
Alliance, Offensive and Defensive, lately concluded between
Great Britain, France, and Holland, which makes so great
a Noise in the World, and by which we seem to be infallibly quieted and secured from all Fears of any Disturbance
from abroad.
'But these Gentlemen, when all their other Arguments
are refuted, betake themselves to their last Refuge, which
they are presuaded can never fail them, and that is the Discontents and Disaffection of the Pretender's Party, who
only wait a fresh Opportunity by raising a new Rebellion
to restore their King, and revenge their late bad Successes.
'I can assure these Gentlemen, that tho' I argue against
a Standing Army, and tho' the Jacobites may perhaps be of
the same Opinion, yet I am no Friend to the Pretender, but
believe myself as firmly attached to the Protestant Succession,
and the Interest of the present Government, and am as
great an Admirer of his Majesty's Conduct and Personal
Virtues, as any of them all. But nevertheless, I hope no
Man will discover himself so void of good Sense, as to
imagine that it is Treason to entertain any Notion in common with that Party. And notwithstanding they may vainly apprehend, that some Advantage will accrue to their
Interest by disbanding the Army, this does not in the least
incline me to the Opinion of the other Side.
'Besides, I do not doubt but even these Malecontents
will make greater Use of the Army, supposing it impossible
to draw them off to their Side, by representing in ill Colours their Behaviour in those Parts where they are placed,
in Hopes to gain Numbers to their Disaffection. And this
is the more certain, if we consider that their first Manifesto's were full of the Grievances of an Army, even before any Army was in Being: Such a prevailing Address
did they think this Argument to the Resentments of Englishmen. Nor do we find they have been more silent upon
this Subject, since the Rebellion has been suppressed. What
Noise have we heard of the Riot at Oxford? And of the
other little Disorders of the Soldiery, in the several Parts
of the Kingdom? And this has not been without its Effect;
for many, who were good Subjects to his Majesty, have
talked warmly on this Head, being jealous of their Liberties, who otherwise would not have wavered in their Respect to the present Government. How far therefore the
Favourers of the Pretender may carry their Success, by insisting on the farther Effects of an Army, established by
Law, who certainly cannot commit fewer Outrages, is not
difficult to imagine.
'In short, the whole Management of this Project of a
Standing Army is ridiculous; but the fatal Consequences
of it require deeper Thought. For when we have fooled
out ourselves into the Bondage of a Standing Army, how
shall we ever get out of it again? Not as the Nation freed
themselves from the Court of Wards. We cannot buy it
off, for two very good Reasons: No Money will be taken
for it; and we shall have nothing to give which is not
theirs already; our Estates, Lives and Liberties will be all
at their Command.
'The Prince of Orange's Declaration is directly against
a Standing Army, as a Means to assist all arbitrary Designs, and thereby enslave the Nation; directly against all
wicked Attempts of Conquest, and all despotick Government, 'tis full of Liberty and Property in every Part. And
his present Majesty, who is endowed with the same generous and heroick Temper, has given undeniable Proofs of the
same gracious Inclinations; we may reasonably suppose that
the wisest of Kings, in Conjunction with the best of Parliaments, will, in this important Affair, discover the same
Sentiments with our glorious Deliverer, to whom we principally owe our present Happiness. That Declaration was
so highly valued, and so wholly relyed upon by the Parliament then, that it is incorporated into our Laws, as the
only Redress of our past Grievances and Oppressions, and
the best Foundation of our future Happiness: And with intire Confidence that his Majesty King William would continue to act in Pursuance of that Declaration, the Parliament resolved that he should be elected and declared King;
so that it is to be accounted the Pacta Conventa of the Government.
'Here I know some will say, that the Army condemned
by the Declaration, was the late King James's Army kept
up in Time of Peace without Consent of Parliament;
whereas this Standing Army is to be kept up with their
Consent.
'True it was so, and therefore, it was a Riot and unlawful Assembly every Hour it stood; and having no Law for
it, it might have been presented or indicted; to no Purpose
indeed: But as an Invasion upon the Subject, it might be
resisted and pull'd down as a Nusance, whenever the Nation
found themselves able. But suppose this Army had been
made Part of the Constitution, and had obtain'd an Act of
Parliament for it, what then had been become of us? They
were Aids and Instruments of Arbitrary Government before,
but then they had been legal Instruments, and had enslay'd
us by Authority. In short, we could not have reliev'd ourselves from them, nor any one else in our Behalf, because
our own Act and Deed would have always been good against us.
What I have said against Standing Armies, I would be
understood of such as are the Instruments of Tyranny, and
their Country's Ruin, and therefore I need make no Apology to our own, which next unto God, have by their Bravery and Conduct preserv'd our Liberties and the Protestant
Religion thro' Europe, and have so lately delivered these
Nations from the unnatural Designs and Attempts of their
Fellow-Subjects to dethrone his present most gracious Majesty, who is the Guardian of our Laws and Privileges, and
to introduce Arbitrary Power. For if in future Reigns any
Designs should be levell'd against our Laws, we may be
assur'd these Men would be discarded, and others promoted
in their Rooms, who are fit for such Arbitrary Purposes.
'Nor do I think it reasonable that our Army should be
ruin'd by that Tranquility and Peace, which, by their Courage and Fidelity, they have procur'd for their Country;
and I doubt not but the Generosity and Gratitude of the
Parliament will give them a Donative equal to their Commissions, which will amount to no extraordinary Sum, at
least, it will be an easy Composition for the Charge of keeping them.
'But if there are any Gentlemen who think we can no
otherwise express our Gratitude, but by signing and sealing
our Posterity's Ruin, I hope we shall disappoint their Expectations, and not give the World occasion to tell so foolish
a Story of us. They know very well, an Army has nothing
in it so charming that could induce the Nation to raise one,
but upon some pressing Necessity, and not to keep them up
perpetually; nor can the Service perform'd be ever so great,
as not to be requited under such a Return.
'To conclude: The Honour and Safety of the Nation
is the commendable Design; and so far as any Side is for
that, it is certainly in the Right, since all Countries must
have some Force to defend them against foreign Invasions
and domestick Tumults; for as it was their own Good and
Security which occasion'd Men first to quit the State of Nature, and to associate themselves into Governments; so the
Raising and Regulation of their Forces must be directed and
accommodated to the same Ends. An Island is best situated
for Preservation, as having need of little other Force either
to infest foreign Coasts, or to protect its own, besides a numerous Fleet, which it need never want. But if it be
likewise a Government for Increase, such as ours, its Situation naturally leading to Trade and planting of Colonies;
and if it has the noble Ambition of holding the Balance
steddy between other Governments, of succouring the Distress'd, and grudging Liberty to none, then it must be always provided with a considerable Land-Force. Of this
there is no Dispute. Then the only Question is, Whether
it be safer to trust Arms continually in the Hands of idle
and needy Persons; or only, when there is Occasion for it,
in the Hands of sober and industrious Freemen. That
the latter can never be dangerous to our Liberty and Property at Home, and will be infinitely more effectually
against an Enemy attacking, or invaded by us, I think I
have sufficiently proved both by Reason and Experience.
But that the former may hereafter prove of the worst Consequence, is a Truth equally undeniable, and therefore I
must declare I am for 12,000 Men only.'