The Reformation
The Reformation brought no basic change to the
constitution of the chapter. Only one prebend was
lost, that of Bolton, which was granted to the king
in 1541 with the archdeaconry of Chester to form
part of the new bishopric of Chester. (fn. 1) The constitutional relationship of bishop and chapter remained
unchanged, though with the dissolution of Coventry
Priory the existence of two separate chapters came
to an end. In 1541 it was enacted that the Dean
and Chapter of Lichfield should be 'the full entire
and sole see and chapter of the said bishopric of
Coventry and Lichfield'. (fn. 2) As a result the chapter
had the sole right to confirm grants made by the
bishop, and since it had proved expensive to obtain
the privilege the chapter recouped some of its
expenses by charging the bishop a fee of 40s., in
addition to that claimed by the chapter clerk, for
confirming small grants and more for those of
greater value. (fn. 3)
The right of collating to prebends remained with
the bishop. Rowland Lee (1534-43) and Richard
Sampson (1543-54) either sold, or were persuaded
to give, many presentations to prebendal stalls to
laymen. In 1536 Lee sold to Thomas, Duke of
Norfolk, the first two vacant appointments to
Bishop's Itchington or Gaia Minor, and in 1538, in
answer to Thomas Cromwell's request for a good
prebend, he gave him the presentation to Eccleshall;
in 1540 he sold two reversions to a syndicate which
included Cromwell's nephew, Sir Richard Cromwell. (fn. 4) Bishop Sampson, who alienated much
episcopal property, made a practice of selling
reversions of benefices and in 11 years disposed of 19
presentations to prebendal stalls. (fn. 5) A possible
explanation of this traffic in prebends was the need
to find places for dispossessed monks, for many of
whom the lay impropriators were legally bound to
provide pensions. (fn. 6) During the vacancy after Lee's
death the Crown had presented Stephen Sagar, who
had been the last Abbot of Hailes (Glos.), to one of
the Ufton prebends, and in 1547, probably at
Sagar's instigation, the bishop appointed Philip
Brode, who had been a monk at Hailes, to the
prebend of Dernford. At the beginning of 1550 the
two former colleagues combined to purchase from
the bishop the next assignments of five of the
canonical houses in the Close, thus obtaining partial
control of possible candidates for residentiaryships.
The following year one of the pre-Reformation
canons, Arthur Dudley, Prebendary of Colwich,
bought from the bishop the right of nomination to
four of the remaining houses to prevent the exmonks from gaining complete control of the
chapter. (fn. 7)
As was common at other cathedrals the medieval
statutes, so recently revised, remained in force, those
enjoining 'popish' practices being quietly ignored. (fn. 8)
Royal visitation of cathedral chapters, a short-lived
innovation, was exercised at Lichfield in 1547 and
1559. (fn. 9) The Edwardian visitors did little except
deliver the standard injunctions concerning preaching, vestments, education, and discipline. English
was to be used for anthems and the liturgy, and the
Bible was to be read in English during services; one
criticism which the visitors made was that members
of the cathedral body had not been as 'studious and
diligent in reading of the Bible' as they should have
been. Excessive hospitality was forbidden and not
more than £20 was to be exacted in fines at the
beginning of residence. The vicars choral were to
have one month's leave of absence a year, and the
master of the choristers was to take over from the
precentor and subchanter the duty of choosing and
managing the choristers. (fn. 10) The visitation of 1559
added nothing apart from an order that married
canons and vicars were entitled to commons and an
injunction that a register of leases was to be kept.
The 1559 injunction about the register was no
doubt intended as a curb on the chapter. A drastic
change in the chapter's policy on the length of leases
had taken place in the 1540s and 1550s. During these
years the statute of 1294 limiting leases to a term of
20 years was ignored. A great number of fee-farms
were granted, (fn. 11) and in addition there were a number
of leases for long terms, such as 80 or 99 years. (fn. 12)
These leases were usually to local gentlemen and
were not confined to the property of the common
fund: in 1550 the manor of Farewell, belonging to
the choristers, was granted to William, Lord Paget,
in fee-farm. (fn. 13) The most notable example of a local
family which acquired fee-farms of chapter property
is the Gell family of Hopton in Derbyshire. Before
1559 Ralph Gell acquired leases of land and tithes
in many of the Peak parishes and their chapelries
either in perpetuity or for very long terms of years,
and the family continued to accumulate leases up to
the time of the Civil War. (fn. 14) In 1550 Ralph Gell and
his heirs were granted the office of receiver-general
and collector of the farms, rents, and profits of the
chapter, with the exception of the tithes of wool and
lambs, in the Bakewell jurisdiction. For this office
and the fee-farm of Kniveton Gell paid a fine of
£120. (fn. 15) Other beneficiaries included the Vernon
family, which in 1543 acquired the farm of the
grain and hay tithes in the Peak at an annual rent
of £37 and was still paying the same in 1649. (fn. 16)
There are several possible explanations for these
grants of fee-farms and long leases; the most
probable is that the chapter needed ready money
and could charge large entrance fines for such
grants. (fn. 17) It is evident that by the late 1540s the
chapter was having to consider ways of eking out its
reduced revenues. In 1548 it decided that canons
could be absent for up to 40 days in each quarter
and still receive commons for the time of their
absence; the object of this was to persuade residentiaries to spread their residence more evenly
through the year and lessen the burden of
hospitality. (fn. 18) In 1553, however, it was decided that
the measure was dishonourable and contrary to the
statutes, and it was revoked. (fn. 19) The Act of 1559
limiting the term of leases granted by archbishops
and bishops seems also to have applied to deans and
chapters; leases, except those to the Crown, were
in future to be for 21 years or for the term of three
lives only and the rents charged were to be no lower
than the 'old, accustomed' ones. (fn. 20)
As a result of the Edwardian visitation a new post
was created at the cathedral, that of divinity
lecturer. The first lecturer, Dr. John Ramridge,
Prebendary of Hansacre, appeared before the
chapter with his letter of appointment from Archbishop Cranmer at the beginning of 1548. He was to
lecture in the choir three times a week, receiving
annually £10 from the chapter, 5 marks from the
chancellor, and board for himself and a servant.
Ramridge then offered to undertake the residentiaries' preaching turns as well if his stipend from
the dean and chapter were raised to £20; it was
agreed that he should receive £20 and whatever
payments he could obtain from the residentiaries,
but no board. (fn. 21) In July 1548 the Duke of Somerset
ordered Ramridge's removal, presumably because
of his lack of zeal for reform, and replaced him with
Laurence Saunders, later a Marian martyr. (fn. 22) The
post lapsed during Mary's reign, and an injunction
delivered at the royal visitation of 1559 ordered the
reappointment of a divinity lecturer. (fn. 23)
The most notable change in the personnel of the
cathedral during the years of the Reformation came
with the dissolution of the cathedral's chantries in
1548 and the consequent disappearance of the body
of chantry chaplains. (fn. 24) In April 1549 the royal
commissioners arrived to inquire into the possessions
of the seventeen chantries and the arrangements for
obits and lights. (fn. 25) There is no direct reference in the
records of the cathedral to the destruction of the
chantries, but at the end of the year the residentiaries
were dividing amongst themselves the altar ornaments and various vestments. (fn. 26) During the following
years the property of the chantries was sold off,
mainly to London speculators, although much of it
came eventually into the hands of local landowners,
such as the Levesons and the Pagets. (fn. 27) Some of the
endowments of the chantries had been lost even
before their dissolution in 1548 with the sale of the
property of the abbeys which had provided them
with pensions. In 1544 and 1546 the chapter had
made strenuous efforts to recover the endowments of
Dean Heywood's chantries, invested with the
abbeys of Halesowen, Lilleshall, and Dale, from the
laymen to whom the abbeys had been granted; the
report of the commissioners in 1548 shows that this
effort was unsuccessful. (fn. 28) The chantry chaplains'
college was sold to London speculators and came
eventually into the hands of the corporation of
Lichfield. (fn. 29) The chantry chaplains for the most part
disappeared without trace, although some of them
are found later in receipt of pensions, and one or
two of them may have obtained Staffordshire
livings. (fn. 30)
At the Reformation the vicars were brought
more closely under the control of the dean and
chapter; this was a direct reversal of the position in
the early years of the century when the vicars had
been demanding, and obtaining, more independence. (fn. 31) In February 1539 a royal commission,
consisting of the bishop, the president of the
chapter, and two laymen, drew up new statutes for
the vicars. (fn. 32) Any statutes made by the vicars themselves were to be disregarded, and all new statutes
were to be made by the dean and chapter and were
not to be changed without their knowledge and
consent. The intitulator was to keep a strict watch on
the movements of the vicars and all absences were
to be reported. (fn. 33) Regulations were made for the
payment of tenths and first fruits by the vicars, and
it was decided that no vicar should be allowed to
act as bailiff or collector. None of their property
was to be leased for a term of lives or for more than
15 years without the knowledge and consent of the
dean and chapter, and the vicars were not to dispose
of any of their goods without the chapter's
permission; if called upon they were to make a
yearly account to the chapter. It seems that the funds
which had been established for the vicars (fn. 34) had
become depleted, and the commissioners allowed the
vicars a year to restore them to their former
amounts. There were in addition the usual regulations about attending services and not introducing
suspect women into the Close, and also an order
forbidding the vicars to sell water from the aqueduct.
In 1544 the vicars were given a 'friendly warning'
to mend their ways; otherwise the statutes would be
applied in their full vigour. (fn. 35)
The vicars narrowly escaped losing all their
property at the beginning of 1549 under the terms
of the Chantries Act of 1547. A prima facie case was
made out against them that they were 'incorporated
by the name of a college' and that all their possessions
should be confiscated. The chantry commissioners,
however, found that in fact the vicars were 'united
and consolidated to the corporation of the dean and
chapter', and they were confirmed in their possessions by letters patent later in the year. (fn. 36)
Several of the vicars took advantage of the
Edwardian Act permitting clerical marriage. On
Mary's accession two priest vicars were deprived
for marriage, and in August 1558 Thomas Bagot, a
lay vicar whose wife had just died, was ordered to
return to live in common with the other vicars. (fn. 37) The
1559 injunctions laid down that married vicars were
to be permitted to receive commons even if they
lived outside the Close. (fn. 38)
Very little is known of the choristers during the
years of the Reformation. They were put directly
under the control of the master of the choristers,
and they retained their property which continued to
be administered for them by the chapter. (fn. 39) The 1547
and 1559 injunctions ordered that each chorister
should be given an annual pension of £3 6s. 8d. for
five years after his voice had broken to enable him
to attend a grammar school. (fn. 40)
The most damaging loss to the cathedral at the
Reformation was the destruction or removal of many
of its treasures. St. Chad's shrine, which was said
to bring in an annual income of £400, (fn. 41) was among
those destroyed in the general attack on pilgrimage
shrines in 1538. The statues, jewels, and other
ornaments were seized by the Crown, but Bishop
Lee persuaded the king to grant the shrine itself to
the cathedral for its own uses, (fn. 42) while St. Chad's
bones were smuggled away by Canon Arthur
Dudley. (fn. 43) In March 1548 the chapter ordered the
removal of the statues on the high altar and elsewhere in the cathedral in accordance with the royal
decree of 21 February, (fn. 44) and by the end of 1549 the
chantry chapels had been dismantled. (fn. 45) The body of
the cathedral seems to have survived undamaged,
and it appears from later descriptions that much of
the medieval glass and most of the monuments were
left intact. (fn. 46) Hardly any evidence survives concerning work on the fabric between 1538 and the Civil
War, though it is known that in 1543 Robert Hodd
of Ludlow (Salop.) was appointed to gild the
reredos for £40, and in 1550 Dean Williams, who
had won Henry VIII's favour through his skill as an
architect, came to an agreement with John Osbaston
of Abbots Bromley for the repair of the central tower,
which had been struck by lightning. (fn. 47)
The vestments, plate, and service-books of the
cathedral were dispersed during Edward VI's reign.
In 1549 the residentiaries divided among themselves
the albs and the money received for 'ly canopy', and
in the following year the chapter sold all the books
in the choir, having first defaced them, and divided
the proceeds, each canon receiving 5s. 4d. (fn. 48) Despite
all this the cathedral was still thought worthy of the
Crown's attention. At the end of April 1553 five
commissioners visited Lichfield and seized all
remaining vestments and ornaments; the best were
locked away under seal in the cathedral and the rest
sold. On 18 May Edward Littleton, one of the
commissioners, returned to collect what had been
left behind — silver plate, crosses, and thuribles,
the best copes, and two mitres. Having poured the
consecrated oil from three silver cruets on the
ground, he loaded everything into a cart and took it
away. (fn. 49) Of the cathedral's furnishings all that
appears to have been left behind were 2 silver-gilt
chalices with patens, 6 cloths for the communion
table, 24 old cushions, a brass lectern, and the 12
bells in the towers. (fn. 50)
It is impossible to estimate the extent of this loss
since the only full surviving inventory of the goods
of the cathedral is that made in 1345. (fn. 51) By the early
16th century some of the vestments were evidently
shabby. In 1523 Bishop Blythe ordered a levy from
the revenues of the prebends to help renew the
copes. (fn. 52) The move appears to have had no success,
however, for in 1531 the chapter put restrictions on
the use of the copes on the grounds that they were
almost worn out by long use and no resources
(facultates) existed for their repair. (fn. 53) At the same
time it was directed that the service-books in the
choir, which were also worn out through age and
long use, should be repaired. (fn. 54) The value of the
plate and church ornaments lost must, however,
have been considerable. The accession of Mary and
the restoration of the old forms of worship found
the cathedral lacking most of the furniture for divine
service. The shifts to which the chapter was put
when it reviewed the situation in October 1553 are
revealing. There were no service-books left and all
that could be procured by the chapter clerk were
two breviaries: a large one which he obtained from
Humphrey Swynnerton and a damaged one given
by Sir Thomas Fitzherbert. Vestments were also in
short supply, and one of the prebendaries contributed a chasuble and two tunicles. (fn. 55) More were
evidently collected later: in 1579 the Privy Council
ordered the destruction of 'certain copes, vestments,
tunicles and such other Popish stuff' which the dean
had reported to be in the cathedral. (fn. 56)
The doctrinal changes between the 1530s and the
1550s seem to have caused few crises of conscience
at Lichfield. A good example of the conforming
attitude of the chapter is the career of Henry Sydall,
B.C.L., a prebendary from 1541 and holder of Dean
Yotton's chantry. In 1548 he was deprived of his
chantry but ordered to continue to preach at
Lichfield; he was an equally zealous conformist
under Mary when he helped to persuade Cranmer to
recant, and on the accession of Elizabeth he was one
of the first to take the Oath of Supremacy. (fn. 57) One
prebendary was deprived in 1546 for refusing to pay
tithes to the king, (fn. 58) and the dean and two prebendaries were deprived for marriage on the accession
of Mary. (fn. 59) The biggest upheaval came in 1559 after
the accession of Elizabeth I. (fn. 60) The dean, John
Ramridge, who had been divinity lecturer under
Edward VI and had obtained the deanery under
Mary, was imprisoned in the Tower; he was
released on bail and escaped to Flanders. He was
succeeded by Lawrence Nowell, the Anglo-Saxon
scholar, who was rarely resident at Lichfield. Also
deprived were the precentor, Henry Comberford,
who was accused in February 1559 of 'lewd preaching and misdemeanour' by the bailiffs of Lichfield, (fn. 61)
and the chancellor, Alban Langdale, said to be
'learned and very earnest in papistry'; the treasurer
took the Oath of Supremacy in 1559 but resigned
the following year. The chancellor and the precentor
were replaced by extreme Protestants who were,
however, rarely, if ever, resident at Lichfield. Of the
canons residentiary one was deprived, one retired,
and the other four conformed; it was probably due
to these four that there were no violent innovations
after 1558. Of the other prebendaries three were
deprived in 1559 and three more in 1562.
The Cathedral under Elizabeth I and the Early Stuarts
The period after Elizabeth I's accession must have
been a time of considerable adjustment for the
chapter, both to a new liturgy and to a reduction in
revenues. Very few records of chapter acts have,
however, survived between 1560 and the Civil War.
It is therefore impossible to draw any definite
conclusions about the character of cathedral life
during this period, and any generalizations are based
on very fragmentary evidence.
Notes made for the guidance of the communars
in the 1580s give an idea of the revenues of the
chapter at this period and how they were accounted
for. (fn. 62) The total revenue of the common fund was
just over £360 a year. Of this £137 13s. 8d. came
from leases of chapter property, £3 7s. from rents of
the land given by Dean Heywood, and £161 14s. 3½d.
from the Peak parishes; in addition there should
have been £110 a year from pensions, but it was
usually possible to collect only some £60 of this.
The revenue of the farm of the tithes of wool and
lambs from the Peak seems to have been divided
among the chapter separately. (fn. 63) Out of these receipts
there had to be paid the commons of the residentiaries at the rate of £21 9s. each for a full year's
residence, and the commons of the bishop and dean
at double the rate. Each vicar was paid £4 11s. 3d. a
year in commons. Over £70 went to the queen in
payment of subsidies and tenths. Another £53 went
in fees and salaries to the chapter clerk, the organist,
the porter, the collector of the Bakewell revenues,
and other officials, and in augmentation of the
stipends of the vicars of the Peak parishes. Finally
there were unspecified foreign expenses; in the
years 1574-85 these varied between £3 15s. 10d. in
1575 and £130 17s. 1d. in 1581. It was estimated in
the mid 1580s that the average income of the
chapter was about £364 and the average expenditure
was about £383, if 5 canons were in residence and
there were 17 or 18 vicars. This deficiency involved
the communars in extensive borrowings from the
chapter's reserve fund, the baga de Whalley. (fn. 64)
The income of the fabric fund was kept separate
from that of the common fund and consisted of some
£5 18s. in rents from various fabric lands, together
with receipts from 'stall money' paid by prebendaries without vicars, burials in the cathedral, (fn. 65) and
various other fees. From this income the cathedral
had to be kept in good repair and fees paid to a clerk
of the fabric, a clocksmith, a plumber, a bellringer,
an organ-blower, and other officials. (fn. 66) The income
from the choristers' property, which amounted to
about £58 a year, was also managed separately. This
money was used to pay the stipends of the eight
choristers at £1 each a year and a fee of 26s. 8d. to
the master of the choristers. (fn. 67) From it also came
annual payments of £6 13s. 4d. for the boys'
clothing and 26s. 8d. for fuel.
There is little evidence about the policy which
the chapter pursued in managing its estates, for,
although the 1559 injunctions ordered the keeping
of registers of leases, such registers survive only
from 1631. (fn. 68) Where a comparison is possible it
appears that during the later 16th century the farms
charged by the chapter corresponded more or less
to the annual values given in the Valor Ecclesiasticus. (fn. 69) Although the chapter continued to suffer
financially from the effects of long leases granted in
the 1540s and 1550s, (fn. 70) after 1559 most of the
surviving leases were for 21 years, with occasional
leases for three lives. (fn. 71)
From the 1560s the chapter even leased the tithes
of wool and lambs in the Peak, the collection of
which it had kept in its own hands for so long. In
1566 the tithes were leased to Sir Edward Littleton
at a rent of £115 a year; the lease was for 20 years,
renewable for another 20 years in 1586. (fn. 72) By the
1630s the farm of these tithes had passed into the
hands of the Gell family, the most notable farmers
of the chapter's property. (fn. 73) Even after the Restoration the tithes were still being leased for only £115
a year, (fn. 74) although it had been found in 1649 that
they were usually worth £450 a year. (fn. 75) The rent,
which was paid half-yearly, was not added to the
common fund but was divided immediately among
the residentiaries. (fn. 76)
Much money was lost because impropriators of
churches formerly appropriated to monastic houses
were reluctant to pay pensions due to the chapter.
It has been seen above how nearly half of the income
from pensions was proving impossible to collect in
the 1580s. In 1612 25 of the chapter's 45 pensions
were in arrears, most of them from Henry VIII's
reign. The chapter decided to sue the impropriators,
when it could discover who they were, in the
Exchequer and Court of Arches, and it asked a
lawyer to draw up a general bill against them for
payment of arrears from 1534-5. (fn. 77) Evidently it met
with little success as many of the pensions had
virtually lapsed by the 18th century. (fn. 78)
By the 1590s it was apparent that the common
fund could no longer support a full chapter of a
dean and six residentiaries, and in 1596 Bishop
Overton's statutes laid down a new system of
residence, as complicated as that drawn up at the
end of the 12th century. (fn. 79) The year, running from
Michaelmas, was thenceforth to be divided into
halves. Three residentiaries were to be in residence
in each half of the year; the dean was allowed to
choose which half he preferred for his residence.
Every canon was to reside at least 12 full weeks in
his half. Any surplus revenue was still to be divided
according to quarters (stadia), but this was now an
artificial concept. Canons in residence between
Michaelmas and the Annunciation were to lose their
dividend for one quarter if they were absent more
than 93 days, for 2 quarters if they were absent
more than 114 days, for 3 quarters if they were
absent more than 135 days, and for the whole year
if they were absent more than 156 days. A similar
scale was laid down for those resident in the second
half. One of the canons in residence during the first
half was obliged to provide hospitality within the
Close during the twelve days of Christmas, and one
of those in residence during the second half was
responsible for hospitality during Easter Week and
at Whitsun; the burden of hospitality thus fell on
each canon once every three years. (fn. 80) Even with a
reduction in commons the cathedral's revenues were
insufficient to maintain a dean and six residentiaries,
and it was laid down that the number of residentiaries was to be reduced to four when the death or
resignation of the existing canons permitted it. The
scheme of residence was then to be altered to two
senior canons in residence for the first half and two
junior canons resident in the second. These changes
were later attributed to the reduction in revenues
caused by grants of fee-farms and leases for long
terms at 'very small' reserved rents, (fn. 81) presumably
those of the 1540s and 1550s. A fragmentary act
book for the last years of the 16th century provides
confirmation of the chapter's financial embarrassment at that period. In 1598, for example, Bishop
Overton agreed to take no more than £13 6s. 8d. a
year for his commons in order to lighten the burden
on the cathedral's finances, (fn. 82) while the following
year the canons gave a tenth of the income of their
prebends to the cathedral after the dean had appealed
to them for help. (fn. 83)
The estate policy of the chapter in the early 17th
century differed little from that which had damaged
its revenues in the previous century; in common with
other ecclesiastical corporations of the time, long
leases at uneconomic rents in return for high entry
fines were still the rule. (fn. 84) In 1634 the Lichfield
chapter, with the chapters of other cathedrals and
collegiate churches, was warned by the Crown to
stop converting leases for years into leases for lives.
It was ordered that in future no leases were to be
made for more than 21 years and no leases at all
were to be made by deans after their appointment to
a 'better' deanery or a bishopric; in this way it was
hoped that chapters could be prevented from
depriving their successors of entry fines or the
benefits of increased rents. (fn. 85) The full extent of the
chapter's mismanagement of its property can be seen
in the reports of the commissioners appointed to
survey the chapter estates under the terms of the
Act of 1649 'for the abolishing of deans, deans and
chapters, and canons'. (fn. 86) The unfavourable leasing
of wool tithes in the Peak parishes has already been
mentioned. The mineral tithes of the Peak, which
were farmed by the chapter before the Reformation, (fn. 87) had been lost completely by the cathedral
to a lay impropriator, Sir John Gell; in 1649 the
tithes of lead ore were said to be worth nearly £1,000
a year. (fn. 88) Sir John Gell held the office of receiver in
the Peak under the lease of 1550 and was found to be
taking tithes of woodland but not accounting for
them to the chapter. (fn. 89) Even when the lease was a
recent one the terms benefited only the canons who
shared the entry fine: the glebe of Tideswell was
leased in 1637 for £12 whereas it was estimated in
1649 to be worth £46 a year. (fn. 90) In many cases the
rents charged were still the same as the annual values
given in the Valor Ecclesiasticus. In 1650, for
example, the rectory of Edgbaston was being farmed
for 53s. 4d. a year, the 1535 value, when it was in fact
worth £47 6s. (fn. 91) The rest of the chapter property was
under-exploited in the same way. Whereas the lands
given to the cathedral by Dean Heywood and the
property belonging to the fabric fund produced rents
totalling only £11 a year, the commissioners considered them to be worth £135 a year. (fn. 92) The same
inadequate rents were found in the case of prebendal
properties. The dean's prebend of Brewood had
been leased in 1628 for three lives at a rent of £30,
but the total value of the lands, profits, and tithes
was £185 a year in 1649; the prebend of Flixton was
leased on the same terms in 1620 at a rent of £16
and was worth £122 in 1649, and the prebend of
Tervin had been leased for 90 years in 1559 at a rent
of £1 a year and was worth £14 10s. in 1649. (fn. 93)
A few of these leases were used by the chapter to
reward its officers. The chapter clerk, for example,
held land in Lichfield on favourable terms and paid
a peppercorn rent for a house in the Close which
the commissioners valued at £4 a year. (fn. 94) The clerk
by this period was responsible for the routine
administration of the chapter estates and many of
the prebendal estates: in the 1620s, for example,
Thomas Glazier transacted business for both residentiaries and non-residentiaries, collecting rents
and tithes, paying wages and dues, repairing houses,
and arranging for proctors. (fn. 95)
The chapter's relations with the bishop were
generally harmonious during this period, though
there was a sharp clash early in Bishop Overton's
episcopate. (fn. 96) Shortly after his appointment in 1580
the bishop, heavily in debt (fn. 97) and harassed by lawsuits, demanded from the clergy of the diocese a
subsidium charitativum of a twentieth of their
revenues. The cathedral clergy refused to pay on
the grounds that such a claim had never been made
to enable a bishop to meet his normal expenses, and
that they were exempt in any case. The bishop
threatened the canons with a suit under the writ de
scandalis magnatum and arrested two of them. When
his case collapsed he obtained an order from the
Court of High Commission directing two of the
canons to lend him £100 each or appear before the
court. One of the canons, who was 70 years old and
confined to his room, gave in under the threat; the
other went to London with the dean, but Overton
managed to obtain an order for £30 costs against
him. There were further disputes over the bishop's
refusal to recognize the cathedral statutes as valid
and the reluctance of the dean and chapter to
confirm grants of leases, offices, and annuities
which the bishop had made to one of his sons-inlaw; the chapter's explanation of its action was that
the possessions of the bishopric should not be
squandered. These quarrels led Archbishop Grindal
to order a visitation of the cathedral by John
Whitgift, then Bishop of Worcester; this took place
at the beginning of 1583. It resulted in the reappointment of a divinity lecturer (fn. 98) and the appointment of
four canons, the 'best learned and affected to
religion', to visit the chapter peculiars and report on
the ministers' 'sufficiency and worthiness'. Relations
between Overton and George Boleyn, the dean who
had led the opposition to him, were still bad in 1587
when Boleyn complained that the bishop refused to
quit the Deanery; Boleyn had been living in a
canonical house which he had promised to give up
to the Earl of Essex. (fn. 99)
During James I's reign deans began to be appointed by the Crown under a congé d'élire. (fn. 100)
Unlike some other deaneries Lichfield was not
greatly sought-after: in 1625 the Chancellor of
Salisbury asked for the deanery of either Salisbury
or Rochester 'or at least of poor Lichfield, which is
hardly worth £100 per annum'. (fn. 101) Yet it proved during
the early 17th century a good stepping-stone to
further ecclesiastical preferment. Of the seven deans
appointed between 1603 and the Civil War three
moved to bishoprics and two to more lucrative
deaneries; (fn. 102) Dean Tooker, who remained at Lichfield from 1605 until his death in 1621, is said to
have narrowly missed receiving the bishopric of
Gloucester, (fn. 103) and Dean Higgs's career was interrupted by the outbreak of war.
Bishop Overton's statutes do not seem to have
been strictly observed during the period before the
Civil War. Though by the 1630s the residentiary
chapter had been reduced to a dean and four canons
the elaborate system of residence had broken down
and the five residentiaries were dividing the year
into five sections and residing in turn; any canon
who failed to perform his residence forfeited his
commons for the whole year. (fn. 104) Overton's statutes
appear, indeed, to have been unknown to, or ignored
by, Bishop Wright, who in 1638 informed Laud
that the cathedral statutes had not been renewed
since 1526 and were 'very capable of reformation'.
Laud himself had apparently commended the work
of revision to Wright and the chapter during his
metropolitical visitation of the diocese in 1635.
Several drafts were prepared and additions were
made from the recent Canterbury statutes; but
when Wright attempted to impose the new statutes
upon the cathedral some two years later he was
opposed by Dean Fell. The dean complained to
Laud that the bishop's additions were prejudicial to
the cathedral and added that if Wright and his
successors were to make a habit of producing new
statutes at their visitations it would probably lead
to confusion. Laud, evidently impressed by the
argument, reminded the bishop that 'as the course
of the kingdom now stands, 'tis requisite that all
statutes which are binding to such a body should
be under the Broad Seal'. He forbade Wright to
impose his new statutes upon the cathedral until the
whole body of Lichfield statutes had been revised
by an independent panel of royal commissioners.
This intervention appears to have stifled the
attempt at revision. (fn. 105)
The number of vicars tended to decrease during
the later 16th century. In 1568, owing to the age and
weakness of some vicars and the lack of musical
ability among the priest vicars, there were not
enough vicars to carry on the services properly. The
chapter therefore decided that lay vicars should in
future be appointed to two stalls usually reserved
for priest vicars and called epistolers' stalls. (fn. 106) At
this time, out of a total of 18 or 19 vicars, 6 were
laymen, compared with 14 priests and 7 laymen in
1535; by 1616 only 4 of the 16 vicars were priests. (fn. 107)
Little is known of the late-16th-century or early17th-century vicars. Robert Tarentyre, admitted as
a lay vicar in 1595 after the chapter had received
letters of recommendation from the queen, was a
singer (psaltes) in the Chapel Royal and presumably
a good musician. He remained a member of the
Chapel Royal, however, so that his Lichfield appointment was evidently intended merely as a sinecure;
there is no evidence that he was ever in residence or
took part in the services. In April 1598 the chapter
granted him £10 a year while he remained in the
queen's service, since he was unable to come to
Lichfield and therefore received no commons or
dividend. By the following September, however, he
was dead. (fn. 108) A musician who did come to Lichfield
was the composer Michael East. East, whose music
forms one of the links between that of the great
English madrigalists and that of the school which
produced Purcell, became master of the choristers
at some date between 1610 and 1618 and remained
at Lichfield until his death in 1648. Compositions
which he published during his years at Lichfield
include anthems presumably composed for use at
the cathedral. (fn. 109)
There is little evidence concerning the corporation
of vicars as a whole, but it is evident that by the
1590s the statute of 1539 which stated that no vicar
should act as bailiff for the corporation was virtually
a dead letter. When in 1595 the subchanter and a
minority of the vicars complained to the chapter
about the election by a majority of the vicars of one
of their number, John Ballard, as bailiff, the chapter
merely appointed another vicar, Raphael Potter, to
the post. (fn. 110) Although the estate policy of the vicars
is even more sparsely documented than that of the
chapter it would seem that they too failed to exploit
their property to the full. In 1616 their yearly
revenues totalled £148, from which they had to pay
subsidies to the king, chief rents to various lords,
and the cost of repairing their hall and houses. They
had also to pay the fees of a collector and a bailiff
and to defend lawsuits; the yearly accounts, or
'restore', of the vicars include such items as 'Mr.
Bearsley's charges to Hampton to serve Mr. Levison
with [a] process'. (fn. 111) In 1632 the vicars were warned
by the chapter not to grant leases for longer than a
term of 20 years renewable every five years, and in
1634 the chapter was reminded by the Crown that
the royal order against leases for lives applied also
to the vicars. (fn. 112) On the balance of the revenues
supplemented by the commons paid by the chapter
sixteen vicars subsisted; in 1616 only one of the
four priest vicars held any other benefice. (fn. 113) There
were the usual problems caused by vicars' unruliness.
In 1591, for example, two vicars were indicted at
Quarter Sessions for having gathered a mob and
assaulted one of their colleagues in the Close. In
1598 another vicar was summoned before the
chapter to answer for his daily visits to alehouses
and his drunkenness and blasphemies. (fn. 114) In the 1630s
their absences from services were being carefully
noted by the chapter and fines imposed. Laud after
his visitation ordered the expulsion from the Close
of three laymen who had been living with the vicars
in order to avoid holding public office in the city. (fn. 115)
By at least the 1580s the number of choristers had
been reduced to eight, and by that date they were
evidently no longer living in common. In 1582 their
house was let on condition that the boys should have
access to the privy and to the butts in the garden.
The tenant was also to give up the hall, buttery,
and kitchen 'if it fortune the dean and chapter to
take order that the choristers shall keep commons
together in such manner as heretofore they were
accustomed'. (fn. 116) The choristers were taught in a room
somewhere in the Close which, by the 1620s, was
proving 'very loathsome not only unto them but
also unto gentlemen which have resorted thither to
hear music'; as a result the master of the choristers
built them a schoolroom above the adjoining gateways of two canonical houses. (fn. 117) In 1635 Laud
ordered the chapter to try to recover the lease of
the choristers' house and take the building into its
own hands again, presumably so that the choristers
could once more live in common, but no such move
appears to have been made. (fn. 118) It is possible that by the
end of the 16th century the cathedral could no
longer afford to pay choristers retirement pensions
on the scale laid down in the 1547 and 1559 injunctions, for in 1600 a chorister who was leaving the
cathedral was paid only 30s. (fn. 119)
There was no divinity lecturer at the cathedral in
1583, when Whitgift carried out his visitation. This
was reported to the Privy Council and the chapter
was ordered to appoint 'some able, sufficient person,
learned in the tongues and otherwise qualified for
the place, to have continual residence there'; the
lecturer was to have a salary of at least £40 a year. (fn. 120)
The chapter decided that the stipend should be
provided by a levy of a tenth on all prebendal
incomes, though in the case of canons with prebends
worth less than £10 a year the first year's levy on a
new tenure was to be paid from the common fund. (fn. 121)
Without complete act books it is impossible to
trace any liturgical changes in services at the
cathedral, but by the time of Bishop Wright it is
evident that services had become richer and more
elaborate. Some visitors in 1634 noted that 'the
organs and voices were deep and sweet, their
anthems we were much delighted with, and of the
voices two trebles, two counter-tenors, and two
basses, that equally on each side of the choir most
melodiously acted and performed their parts'. In
the vestry they saw 'three old rich copes of cloth of
tissue, a fair communion cloth of cloth of gold for
the high altar and the plate belonging thereunto, rich
and fair, answerable and fit for such a sacred place'. (fn. 122)
Laud himself found little to complain of during his
metropolitical visitation the following year. He
ordered the repair of the bell-frame and also of the
two organs which were 'much defective' and which
he suggested should be combined and made into a
'chair organ'. (fn. 123) He found 'too many seats' in the
body of the church, and Lichfield became one of the
few cathedrals where Charles I's order for the
removal of pews from cathedrals was carried out
completely. (fn. 124) Finally, the Close was to be tidied up:
the churchyard walls were to be repaired and the
Close was not to be made a highway for carriages or
profaned in any other way. (fn. 125)
The visitors in 1634 were shown, amongst other
things, the Lady Chapel 'where they have their 6 of
the clock prayers' — a reference to an early-morning
service regularly held there at 6 a.m. on weekdays;
this time of day was regarded as the most convenient
for servants, workmen, and shopkeepers. The
subsacrist had the duty of ringing the bell and
cleaning the chapel, and one of the priest vicars
officiated. After the service the dean and residentiaries provided hospitality for the vicars. (fn. 126) A
service of matins at 6 a.m. had been enjoined by the
1547 injunctions. By 1559 matins was evidently
celebrated later in the morning, but the injunctions
of that year ordered an early-morning service as well,
at 6 a.m. in winter and 5 a.m. in summer, 'to the
intent that the scholars of the grammar [school] and
all other well-disposed people and artificers may
daily resort thereunto'. (fn. 127) By 1634 the service was
held at 6 a.m. all the year round. (fn. 128)
The chapter's jurisdiction over the Close was
threatened twice by the city authorities in the earlier
17th century. (fn. 129) In 1622 James I granted a new
charter to the city and, it seems by accident, the
traditional clause guaranteeing the independent
liberty of the Close was omitted. The chapter, under
the leadership of Dean Curle, complained, and a
charter which it obtained from the Crown in 1623
not only ratified and confirmed the privileges granted
in 1441 but also amplified them. The Close was to
be entirely separate from the city and exempt from
the jurisdiction of any of the city officials, with the
one minor proviso that the bailiffs of Lichfield
should be allowed to have their maces borne before
them when they attended services at the cathedral.
No citizen was to lose his civic rights by living in
the Close; conversely no craftsman working at the
cathedral was to be refused permission by the city
authorities to live freely in Lichfield. The cathedral
officers, defined in the charter as the vicars choral,
the two chapter clerks, the two clerks of the fabric,
the bailiff of the liberty of the Close, and the collector
of pensions, were to be exempt from jury-service.
At the request of the dean and chapter the bishop,
Robert, Earl of Essex (for life), the dean and
residentiaries, and the bishop's vicar general were
made sole J.P.s within the Close, taking two oaths,
that of a J.P. and that of fidelity to the cathedral.
County coroners were to have the right to hold
inquests in the Close. Three days after the issue of
the capitular charter the city received a revised
version of its own charter in which all the passages
exempting the Close from civic jurisdiction were
restored.
The second threat came in 1635, when the city
authorities petitioned the Privy Council that laymen
living in the Close should be required to contribute
towards Lichfield's ship-money assessment or that
the city's assessment should be reduced. (fn. 130) In a
counter-petition the chapter, in conjunction with the
officials of the diocesan consistory court, alleged that
this move was merely part of a general attack by the
city authorities on clerical privileges. Many people
coming to the cathedral to appear before the
consistory court as plaintiffs or witnesses were, the
counter-petition claimed, unjustly arrested as they
passed through the city, while the corporation had
recently begun to tax the inhabitants of the Close
and to distrain upon their goods for non-payment.
The corporation admitted that the Close was not in
the county of the city but argued that it was within
the city and that the inhabitants should join with
them in paying the city's ship-money. The Close was
in fact assessed separately, and in 1638 the SolicitorGeneral gave his opinion that the Close was in
neither the city nor the county of Lichfield.
During the Civil War Lichfield suffered more
than any other cathedral. The Close was a natural
strongpoint and was besieged three times, with
consequent damage to the cathedral and its surrounding houses. At the beginning of the war a body
of local gentry and Lichfield burgesses under the
leadership of the Earl of Chesterfield and Sir Richard
Dyott garrisoned the Close for the king. On 2 March
1643 parliamentary forces under Lord Brooke, who
was killed in the course of the siege, opened a
bombardment which, after three days, forced the
surrender of the garrison. The cathedral, already
battered by artillery fire, appears to have been
further mishandled by the parliamentary soldiers
who, according to Dugdale, smashed windows and
destroyed monuments, carvings, and muniments.
Having wrecked the church,
they stabled their horses in the body of it, kept
courts of guard in the cross-aisles, broke up the
pavement, polluted the choir with their excrements,
every day hunted a cat with hounds throughout the
church, delighting themselves in the echo from the
goodly vaulted roof, and to add to their wickedness
brought a calf into it wrapped in linen, carried it
to the font, sprinkled it with water, and gave it a
name in scorn and derision of that holy sacrament
of baptism. (fn. 131)
The following month Prince Rupert arrived to
dislodge the parliamentarians. After ten days during
which his artillery was unable to breach the walls
of the Close he drained the moat and sprang two
mines; one was successful, and after some fierce
fighting the garrison surrendered. (fn. 132) The Close
remained a royalist stronghold until 1646; it finally
fell after a destructive siege lasting from March until
July during which the central spire of the cathedral
was destroyed. (fn. 133)
A report made in July 1649 by the parliamentary
commissioners surveying the lands and property of
the chapter shows how much damage the three sieges
had caused. The cathedral itself was 'exceedingly
ruinated; much lead and iron was taken away whilst
it was a garrison, and much lead and other materials
is taken away since, and is continually by evil
persons stolen away in the night'. Much of the
roofing was gone, and the report stated that if
speedy action were not taken the rest of the lead
would soon disappear and the whole roof would
collapse. (fn. 134) The library was a wreck, and the gatehouse at the east end of the Close in ruins. Of the 14
houses in the Close belonging to the chapter (including those leased to the chapter clerk and the
verger), 8 had been entirely destroyed or were out
of repair. The vicars' common hall and their
communal 'boghouse' had been destroyed, and 5 of
their 20 houses were in ruins or out of repair. (fn. 135) The
bishop's palace, according to a survey made a few
years later, was badly damaged, and orchards,
gardens, and walls in and around the Close had been
'digged up to make works and trenches'. (fn. 136) The ruin
of the cathedral itself was completed in October 1651
when, under a parliamentary order of the previous
April, Col. Henry Danvers, Governor of Stafford,
had the remaining lead stripped off the roof and
sold. (fn. 137) This sale and that of other material from the
cathedral appear to have raised some £1,200. Much
of the money vanished into private pockets; well
over two years later £600 assigned to Stafford for
the relief of the poor there had not been paid, while
as late as 1658 the Warwickshire authorities were
still making inquiries about £200 due to them. (fn. 138)
Minor acts of destruction continued after 1651. By
the following year some of the bells had been broken
and others carried off, and in 1653 Dugdale noted
the destruction of the Jesus Bell by 'a Presbyterian
pewterer who was the chief officer for demolishing
of that cathedral'. (fn. 139) The communion plate and linen
had been carried off by the defeated parliamentary commander after the second siege of 1643. (fn. 140)
The books and manuscripts were destroyed or
scattered. (fn. 141)
The varying fates of canons during the Civil War
and Commonwealth suggest that at the outbreak of
war a fairly wide range of political and ecclesiastical
loyalties may have been represented in the chapter.
Some of the canons adapted themselves to the new
order and even displayed a real or feigned zeal for it:
in 1648, for example, Alexander How signed the
Testimony of the Staffordshire Presbyterian ministers
and John Bisby that of the Shropshire ministers. (fn. 142)
By steering a wary course Richard Love, a friend of
Col. Valentine Walton the regicide, succeeded not
only in retaining his preferments during the
Interregnum but in obtaining the deanery of Ely in
1660. (fn. 143) Others made no secret of their royalist
sympathies. James Fleetwood became chaplain to
the regiment of John, Earl Rivers, and distinguished
himself at the battle of Edgehill. He was subsequently granted the rectory of Sutton Coldfield
(Warws.), from which he was later ejected by
Parliament. (fn. 144) The precentor, William Higgins, was
taken prisoner after Edgehill and imprisoned at
Coventry for three months. He was taken prisoner
again when the Close surrendered in 1646 and on
his release maintained himself and his family by
teaching. When this was forbidden in 1655 he is
stated to have been reduced to penury. (fn. 145) Another
zealous royalist, John Arnway, was taken prisoner
when Shrewsbury fell to Parliament in 1645 and is
said to have fled first to Oxford, then to The Hague,
and finally to Virginia, where he died. (fn. 146) Some of the
cathedral body appear to have remained in or around
Lichfield; in the late 1650s the Trustees for Maintenance of Ministers made various grants to relieve
some of the vicars choral. (fn. 147) What connexions they
retained with the cathedral appears to be unknown.
Parliament appointed a lecturer to serve the
cathedral in July 1646, shortly after the third siege,
and in 1655 the minister serving the cathedral in
place of the dean and chapter received a salary
increase of £50. (fn. 148) No details concerning services at
the cathedral during the Interregnum appear to have
survived.
From the Restoration to 1700
At the Restoration there were two main tasks: the
reconstitution of the chapter and the rebuilding of
the cathedral. Most of the work in the first few
months fell upon Precentor Higgins; the new dean,
Dr. William Paul, was not appointed till February
1661, and there was no bishop to oversee proceedings
between Frewen's translation to York in September
1660 and Bishop Hacket's arrival at Lichfield in
August 1662. (fn. 149) Of the 27 prebends at least 15,
and possibly 18, were vacant at the Restoration.
Bishop Frewen soon began to send in nominations,
and in September 1660 Higgins formed a chapter
with two of the surviving canons, John Mainwaring
and Thomas Tudman, and admitted seven of the
bishop's nominees. (fn. 150) Between then and the following
January a further eight canons were admitted. (fn. 151) The
completion of the residentiary chapter took longer
and was rather more complicated. In the absence of
a dean Precentor Higgins chose three new residentiaries. In April 1661 Dr. Paul was installed as
dean; a few days later he produced a letter from the
king which voided the recent appointments and
ordered that in future no residentiary was to be
admitted without the dean's consent. Higgins
naturally disagreed with this but was overridden by
Dr. Paul, who the following day admitted on his
own authority three royal nominees, including the
chancellor, Richard Harrison, one of those whom
Higgins had admitted. The dispossessed canons
appealed to the Court of Arches, but without
success. (fn. 152) The chapter was meanwhile building up
the number of vicars choral: there were 7 by 1661,
9 by 1663, and 14 by 1664. (fn. 153)
The systematic restoration of the cathedral began
with Dean Paul's arrival, though there are indications that some temporary repairs had been carried
out by Higgins. When services at the cathedral began
again in 1660 the chapter-house and the vestry were
the only parts of the church which were still roofed;
later a makeshift choir may have been prepared in
the nave or the Lady Chapel. (fn. 154) Large sums of money
were needed for the full-scale restoration of the
church, and as an opening move the canons
petitioned the Crown late in 1660, asking that
improved rents from property belonging to prebends
might be devoted to the repair of the cathedral and
the canonical houses in the Close. (fn. 155) In April 1661 a
subscription list was opened, and shortly afterwards
a Mr. Fisher was engaged as 'surveyor' or architect. (fn. 156) Work was pressed on energetically, and in
September 1665 Bishop Hacket wrote that the Lady
Chapel, choir, chancel, transepts, and nave had
been roofed and leaded 'and the side aisles, by God's
blessing, shall be covered by Christmas'. The central
spire was more than half completed. (fn. 157) By April 1666
Hacket could boast to Sheldon that 'we have at
Lichfield the stateliest spire and the goodliest window
in stone to the west that is in England', adding
ruefully: 'I would they were paid for'. (fn. 158) The glass
for the west window was apparently put up later the
same year. (fn. 159) The west front was further adorned by
a statue of Charles II, which has been attributed to
Sir William Wilson; this was placed in the central
niche of the apex. (fn. 160) Two years later the bishop was
occupied with the furnishings and complaining that
'it is come most cross unto our work that the maker
of our organ, by all report a most sufficient artist, is
detained about the organ of Whitehall'. The organbuilder was the famous Bernard Smith ('Father
Smith'). (fn. 161) The cathedral was finally rededicated on
Christmas Eve 1669. (fn. 162)
The work was not, however, complete. Hacket's
last contribution to the restoration before his death
in 1670 was a peal of six bells to be placed in the
south-west tower. Only three had been cast before
his death and only the tenor had been hung. The
three smallest bells were not hung until 1673, and
by the late 1680s it was agreed that all six were 'bad
and useless'. A subscription was opened in 1687 to
pay for the recasting of the bells into a peal of ten,
and Henry Bagley of Ecton (Northants.) was
engaged as bell-founder. Various difficulties were
encountered, and it was not until 1691 that all ten
bells were ready. (fn. 163) Another addition was an
elaborate Classical reredos, completed about 1678.
A much-admired specimen had recently been
installed in the Chapel Royal at Whitehall, and
Dean Smalwood decided to obtain a replica for
Lichfield. He engaged the three master-craftsmen
responsible for the Whitehall reredos, Thomas
Kinward the joiner, Henry Phillips the carver, and
Robert Streeter the painter, and instructed them to
produce another for the cathedral, identical in its
general pattern and ornamentation though somewhat
smaller than the original. The final cost, after some
haggling, was about £310, of which the three
craftsmen's fees amounted to £230. (fn. 164) Another £100
was spent in 1680 when Smith enlarged the organ. (fn. 165)
Even so, as late as 1693 the precentor estimated that
to restore the cathedral to the state in which it was
before the Civil War would cost at least another
£5,000. (fn. 166)
The leading part in the work of restoration was
played by Bishop Hacket. While it is true that
reconstruction was under way when he arrived at
Lichfield in 1662 and continued after his death, it
is also obvious that the chapter owed much to his
energy and generosity and that the traditional
picture of him as virtually the builder of a new
cathedral is substantially correct. Of the £2,729
paid into the restoration fund by July 1663 Hacket
gave £1,160, the chapter itself raised some £965, and
just over £604 came in gifts from individual
subscribers and from collections made in various
parishes in the diocese. (fn. 167) Of a further £835 3s. 2d.
added by September 1665, when Hacket undertook
the management of the fund, the bishop himself
contributed £523 12s. (fn. 168) By July 1666 he was 'drawn
dry and driven to work upon my credit', and a final
estimate of his expenditure shows that by his death
he had given £3,500 towards the restoration of the
cathedral fabric, £1,300 for bells, and £230 for
plate and ornaments. (fn. 169) Besides giving so generously
himself, he was also endowed with all the gifts of
an expert fund-raiser. A month before his death he
claimed to have collected about £15,000 for the
restoration fund, (fn. 170) and his correspondence with
Sheldon shows him appealing to the Duke and
Duchess of York for contributions and asking that
the plight of the cathedral be brought to the notice
of M.P.s. (fn. 171) According to one contemporary he
raised much of the money 'by barefaced begging. No
gentleman lodged, or scarce baited in the city, to
whom he did not pay his respects by way of visit,
which ended in plausible entreaties for some
assistance towards rescuing his distressed church
from ruin'. (fn. 172) Some of his schemes have a very
modern flavour. In 1667 Sir Edward Bagot of
Blithfield was informed that for £8 he could buy one
of the 52 stalls to be erected in the choir; his name
would be set on an escutcheon over the stall, so that
'among the chiefest nobility and most ancient
gentry . . . your memorial may be recorded; a
patronage to the Church, and for your own honour,
easily purchased'. His wife was asked for a contribution towards the £600 needed for the organ,
which was 'to be called the Ladies' Organ, with his
Majesty's approbation, because none but the
honourable and most pious of that sex shall contribute to that sum'. (fn. 173) Hacket appears to have been
unsuccessful with Lady Bagot, but he obtained ten
distinguished subscribers to the organ fund,
including Frances, Duchess of Somerset, who later
bequeathed to the cathedral some 1,000 volumes of
her late husband's library. (fn. 174)
The bishop's palace in the Close had suffered
badly during the sieges and from decay and looting
during the years that followed. In 1652 the parliamentary commissioners had found it 'a large and
fair edifice built all with stone and a great part
leaded on the roof' but 'very much ruinated', (fn. 175) and
when Hacket arrived at Lichfield he evidently did
not consider it worth repairing. Instead he leased
one of the prebendal houses from the chapter, and
at a cost of over £800 repaired it and so enlarged it
by adding a gallery, a dining-room, other rooms, and
outbuildings that in later years it was converted into
two houses. (fn. 176) The work was almost complete by
March 1667, when Hacket expressed the opinion
that although the house was not large 'no bishop in
England . . . will have a more commodious seat'.
Although he appears to have made efforts to secure
the house for himself and his successors, at the time
of his death it was still only rented from the chapter,
which, however, appears to have been willing to
settle it on the bishops. (fn. 177) Hacket's successor,
Thomas Wood, was not satisfied with it and by 1672
was suing the bishop's son and executor, Sir Andrew
Hacket, for compensation for the decay caused by
the negligent treatment of the former palace, which
had been used as a source of material for other
buildings. (fn. 178) The new bishop, whose relationship
with Hacket had been stormy (see below), appears
to have acted through a mixture of spite and avarice;
and when the case was finally settled by arbitration
in 1684 it was laid down that Wood was to pay
£2,600 towards the reconstruction of the palaces in
the Close and at Eccleshall and Sir Andrew Hacket
£1,400. It was at this time that Wood was suspended,
and the responsibility for building a new palace in
the Close fell on Archbishop Sancroft, who chose
Edward Pierce (or Pearce) as architect and delegated
the task of organizing work at Lichfield to the dean,
Dr. Addison. The foundations were laid on the site
of the old palace in the north-east corner of the
Close in May 1686 and the building was completed
in October 1687. Pierce's dignified Classical house
of brick with stone dressings remains unaltered save
for the two wings added in the 19th century by
Bishop Selwyn. (fn. 179)
In general relations between the chapter and
Hacket were cordial; at the bishop's instigation, for
example, the chapter agreed in the mid 1660s that
each canon should contribute to the restoration fund
a quarter of the fine he received whenever he leased
any of his prebendal property. The only difficulty
that arose was with Dr. John Cornelius, Prebendary
of Hansacre, who despite having agreed to the
measure subsequently refused to contribute. (fn. 180) Both
chapter and bishop suffered when in 1663 Dean
Paul was made Bishop of Oxford, (fn. 181) for his successor
at Lichfield, Thomas Wood, was a constant source
of annoyance. He was appointed through influence
at Court, (fn. 182) and appears to have done all he could to
make himself objectionable to the bishop and the
canons. Hacket complained of his long absences at
London and elsewhere and of his meanness: (fn. 183) thus
he promised £50 towards the restoration but then
announced his intention of spending it on the
reconstruction of the chapter's consistory court in
the cathedral, the only part of the restoration which
Hacket had proposed to leave to the chapter. The
bishop, who had allotted Wood's £50 to the repair
of the pavements, remarked bitterly that 'in effect
he shall escape with nothing contributed to the great
fabric out of the public stock'. (fn. 184) The dean even went
into open opposition; whether out of conviction or
in an attempt to embarrass Hacket he encouraged
the Protestant nonconformists in Lichfield to such
an extent that the bishop wrote angrily of 'the
phrenetic dean, who sides altogether with Puritans
and told me to my face I did more harm than good in
re-edifying this church'. (fn. 185) In fact, the bishop
declared, 'I never met in one man with such an
ingredient of maliciousness, pride, rudeness, covetousness, and ignorance. I must endure him as an
affliction sent by God'. (fn. 186)
Wood aroused similar feelings among the chapter,
whom he appears to have treated with a mixture of
arrogance and indifference. In January 1668 Hacket
informed the archbishop that three residentiaries
(Richard Harrison, Thomas Browne, and Henry
Greswold) had presented a petition against the dean.
Wood, it was alleged, had refused to call chapter
meetings, had ransacked the muniments and
removed some documents, had taken away the
accounts of the keeper of the fabric, and had refused
to confirm a list of preachers drawn up by the
residentiaries on the bishop's instructions. He had
refused several times to appear before Hacket to
answer the charges and on the last occasion had
locked the doors of the chapter-house against the
bishop, compelling him to force the lock. Hacket
excommunicated him, and he caused a disturbance
in the cathedral. (fn. 187) Thomas Browne wrote to
Sheldon supporting the bishop; the dean was, he
said, 'the strangest man that ever I have had anything to do with'. (fn. 188) Despite Hacket's protests Wood
was absolved by the archbishop, and by the end of
January a reconciliation of some sort had been
patched up between him and the chapter. It would,
however, seem that he still maintained his unconstitutional claim to a right of veto in capitular
business, (fn. 189) and the quarrel continued to simmer. He
persisted in his refusal to call chapter meetings —
according to Hacket because the residentiaries
quoted the statutes at him in Latin, which he did not
understand — and though he remained in the Close
he appears to have cut himself off almost completely
from cathedral life. (fn. 190) Hacket went to the aid of the
chapter by making a statute empowering three
residentiaries who had asked the dean to call a
chapter meeting to summon such a meeting themselves if, after three weeks, he had not done so. A
month before his death Hacket was still threatening
to sue and suspend the dean. (fn. 191)
The elevation of Wood to the bishopric of Lichfield as Hacket's successor in 1671 brought no
obvious disadvantages to the chapter, though it was
disastrous for the diocese. Dr. Matthew Smalwood,
his successor as dean, was a capable administrator
who took over Hacket's role as organizer of the
restoration work and managed cathedral business
with little or no reference to the chapter. The
residentiaries were, on the whole, content to allow
him a free hand; on one occasion the precentor,
Henry Greswold, protested at this but his protest
was overridden. (fn. 192)
As the affairs of the cathedral returned to normal,
however, the chapter became less and less willing
to leave all important decisions to the dean, and this
led to a series of disputes with Smalwood's successor,
Dr. Lancelot Addison, father of the essayist Joseph.
The official copy of the cathedral statutes had been
destroyed in the Civil War. Though a satisfactory
text had been produced under Bishop Hacket it had
never been promulgated officially, and Addison
appears to have preferred to base his claims upon
the precedents set by his predecessors, Dr. Paul and
the masterful Dr. Smalwood. The residentiaries,
headed by Precentor Greswold, to whom Hacket had
committed the revision of the statutes, and Christopher Comyn, Prebendary of Bishopshull, began to
campaign for the restoration of their statutory right
of consultation. (fn. 193) In 1689, feeling that it would be
useless to approach Bishop Wood, they sent a
petition to William Lloyd, Bishop of St. Asaph,
explaining the situation and asking for his advice.
Lloyd appears to have avoided becoming committed
and to have recommended a direct appeal to the
dean, but it was inevitable that when he was
translated to Lichfield in 1692 he should have been
prejudiced against Addison. (fn. 194) The visitation of the
cathedral which he held in 1693 and 1694 allowed
Addison's opponents to bring out their complaints
against him. As was to be expected, these mainly
concerned occasions on which Addison had acted
without consulting the chapter: he had, for example,
dismissed the librarian and appointed another on
his own authority and in the same way had assigned
seats in the cathedral himself. Some accusations, of
drunkenness and peculation, were obvious attempts
to blacken his character but were nevertheless
accepted or investigated by the bishop. On the whole
the dean's opponents were successful in humiliating
him. (fn. 195)
One important result of the visitation was the
promulgation of a new code of statutes. In 1668
Hacket had asked the residentiaries to 'compile a
form of statutes out of the old ones . . . adding such
new ones as may conduce to the true worship of
God, to laudable government in the church, and to
a fair and unfailing way of unity among yourselves'.
The work was given to Precentor Greswold;
obsolete pre-Reformation statutes ('ea omnia . . .
quae papisticis temporibus accommodata Ecclesiae
reformatae non convenirent') were dropped and the
remaining statutes were sorted out and, where
necessary, revised. The regulations concerning
residence, for example, were simplified. The dean
and the four residentiary canons were each to reside
at least 90 days in the year — which, as before, ran
from Michaelmas to Michaelmas and was divided
into four quarters. The dean was privileged to
reside in whichever part of the year he wished and
had to pay a 10s. fine to the fabric fund for each day's
residence he missed; the four canons, whose fine
for a day's absence was 5s., divided the four quarters
among themselves according to the rule laid down
in the 1596 statutes, the two senior taking the first
two quarters and the two junior the last two
quarters. The usual practice at the time when the
statutes were being revised and one which, it was
stated, was to be followed as far as possible was that
the senior canon took the first quarter, the second
senior the next quarter, and so on. Canons were to
be permitted to reside for each other, so long as
everyone personally performed 90 days' residence. (fn. 196)
Nothing remained to be done at the time of
Hacket's death, but the collection still needed the
bishop's assent and it was impossible to proceed
further under Bishop Wood. On Bishop Lloyd's
arrival the draft Collectio Hacketiana was submitted
once more to the dean and chapter and they, after
having made a few changes and additions, approved
it. It was sealed by Lloyd in February 1694. (fn. 197) In
addition the bishop supplemented the ten chapters
of Hacket's code with eleven chapters of his own,
promulgated just under a fortnight later in March. (fn. 198)
Various of these settled disputes which had arisen
between the dean and his opponents among the
residentiaries; all the settlements emphasized the
corporate responsibility of the residentiary chapter
and limited the independence of the dean. It was
declared, for example, that seats and benches in the
cathedral were to be assigned jointly by the dean
and the residentiary chapter. (fn. 199) More important were
Lloyd's last two statutes, forced through despite
considerable opposition in the general chapter and
a public protest from Addison. The most bitterly
contested controversy between the dean and the
residentiaries had been provoked by the attempts of
Dr. John Willes, Prebendary of Ufton Decani, to
force himself into the residentiary chapter after the
deprivation of the non-juring Thomas Browne
in 1690. Dr. John Mainwaring, Prebendary of
Weeford, the newly elected residentiary, never came
into residence and Willes tried to take his place. In
this he was resisted by the whole residentiary
chapter. When, however, in 1692 Dr. Mainwaring
died and an election was held for a new residentiary
the chapter was split, two, including the dean, voting
for Thomas White, Prebendary of Longdon, and
two for Willes. Addison gave his casting vote for
White and declared him elected. Willes's two
supporters protested, and Willes himself sued the
dean and chapter in the Exchequer for loss of his
commons. The case was in progress at the time of
Lloyd's visitation, and the two controversial statutes,
ostensibly aimed at preventing the recurrence of a
similar situation, were undoubtedly aimed at the
dean. The first laid down that if in future the
residentiary chapter could not come to a unanimous
decision about the election of a new residentiary, the
matter was to be transferred to the general chapter,
which was to make the election by a majority vote.
The second abolished the dean's casting vote in the
residentiary chapter by decreeing that no decision
could be taken, save in the hebdomadary chapter,
without the approval of at least three of those
present. The bishop's action in thus diminishing the
dean's powers and his open support for Willes
evidently influenced the court. Willes won his case
and duly became a residentiary. (fn. 200)
Lloyd also took measures to augment the
cathedral's income. In 1660-1 the revenues of the
common fund had amounted to some £404, of
which about £164 came from fee-farms, about £118
from other farms, just over £110 from pensions,
and the remainder from rents and Peak revenues.
The real income, however, amounted to only some
£333, the chapter having been unable to collect over
£71 of the money. By 1664-5 the chapter had
succeeded in raising the real income to some £448,
partly by pushing the revenue from farms up to
£179 and partly by reducing the arrears of payment
to £12. Pensions were always in arrears and
continued to be so throughout the rest of the 17th
and the whole of the 18th centuries. After the payment of commons, fees, salaries, royal dues, and
various other expenses there was every year a
surplus to be divided, ranging from over £23 in
1661-2 to just under 30s. in 1664-5. Over the next
35 years the annual revenue of the common fund
varied between £460 and £491. There was a surplus
each year except for 1665-6 and 1666-7 (deficits of
over £11 and almost £31), and between 1671-2 and
1691-2 the annual surplus never dropped below
£60, rising in 1681-2 to over £107. In 1692-3 the
heavy expenses incurred in fighting the Willes case
brought the annual surplus down to under £10, and
from then until the end of the century it did not rise
above £57. (fn. 201) In addition there were of course entry
fines for leases of the common property. These
could be substantial, (fn. 202) and in his 1694 statutes Lloyd
decreed that future residentiaries were to lay aside a
proportion of the fine paid whenever the lease of any
of the property belonging to the common fund was
renewed; in this manner a fund could be raised to
endow two more residentiaryships, thus bringing the
number up to the seven which existed before Bishop
Overton's reform. (fn. 203)
From the evidence given at Lloyd's visitation of
1693 it appears that virtually all the prebendal
property was leased, either for years or for three
lives. It is impossible to estimate the incomes of
individual canons, but it is evident from some of the
complaints that several were suffering because
predecessors had granted leases on favourable terms,
either because of family considerations or in return
for large entry fines. Francis Ashenhurst, Prebendary of Ufton Cantoris, having acquired the existing
lease of the prebendal property, which was for years,
transformed it in 1685 into a lease for the lives of
three of his sons. When Edmund Lees became
Prebendary of Bobenhull in 1686, he found that the
rectory of Bubbenhall, which had at one time brought
in a yearly income of £60, had been leased by a
predecessor for three lives at £3 6s. 8d. a year. (fn. 204)
Addison noted that some canons failed to register
their leases as required by statute, and the visitation
revealed at least one example. (fn. 205) Some canons were
careless of the rights of jurisdiction attached to their
prebends. Willes and Palmer, the two Ufton
prebendaries, had 'neglected to assume the jurisdiction belonging to their prebends'; it had therefore
been exercised by the dean and chapter. (fn. 206) Although
one of Bishop Meuland's statutes laid down that
nullus firmarius habeat cognicionem causarum, Dr.
Edmund Diggle, treasurer from 1660 to 1688, leased
his prebend for three lives with all the jurisdictions,
courts, and perquisites of courts belonging to it. (fn. 207)
The 1693 visitation further revealed that the
spiritual life of the prebendal parishes had suffered as
a result of the canons' neglect. Most of the evidence
pointed that way. Dean Addison claimed that the
only canon who preached in the parish church within
his prebend was Richard Wood of Stotfold. The
churchwardens of Sandiacre (Derb.) complained
about the way in which their church was being
served. (fn. 208) In general the stipends which farmers were
compelled under the terms of their leases to pay
curates were not generous, and where no specific
sums were mentioned payment was low. A canon
noted that there was 'very mean provision' for the
curates of some of the prebendal churches and
churches of the common fund. (fn. 209) At St. Chad's,
Stafford, the curate received only the £7 a year
specified in the farmer's lease. (fn. 210) In Derbyshire the
rectories of Sawley and Wilne, leased by Dr. Diggle,
were valued at about £530 a year; the lease laid
down that the tenant was to provide ministers for
the two parish churches and their three chapels,
Breaston, Long Eaton, and Risley, and was to pay
them stipends amounting in all to at least £34 a year.
The visitation revealed that there was, and had been
for many years, only a single curate to serve all five
churches and chapels. The farmer paid him £36 a
year, of which £7 4s. went in tax. In addition to his
stipend he had only surplice fees and what he could
make out of the perquisites of court — he acted as
the farmer's official with regard to the improperly
leased prebendal jurisdiction. (fn. 211) The affluent curate,
such as the man at Tipton who held the lease of the
rectory, worth £80 a year, was definitely the
exception. (fn. 212) Contemporary opinion realized the
danger that an impoverished parochial clergy might
bring the Established Church into disrepute; Bishop
Lloyd considered that the stipends of some of the
clergy who served cathedral livings were so poor as
to make them contempti et abjecti. (fn. 213) In the second of
his eleven statutes he laid down that in future each
lease of a rectory was to make provision for a stipend
of at least 40 marks (£26 13s. 4d.) for the vicar or
curate. A sliding scale was added, under which a
man who served a parish containing 100 households
was to receive £30 a year, a man serving a parish of
200 households £40 a year, a man serving one of 400
households £50 a year, and a man with one of 600
households or more £60 a year. Special arrangements
were made for the Vicar of St. Mary's, Lichfield,
whose stipend of £30 had become inadequate; the
dean and those canons whose prebends lay partly
in St. Mary's parish were to transfer the small tithes
of the prebends to the bishop for the vicar's use. (fn. 214)
Lloyd also took steps to reorganize the finances of
the vicars choral. Since the outbreak of the Civil
War the corporation had suffered several losses, of
which the most important was that of the almshouse
at Stowe for sick or aged vicars. (fn. 215) Two customary
payments made to vicars by the chapter or by
individual canons had lapsed: the 'interessem' or
'perdition money' divided among the vicars 'for the
greater encouragement of such as come to church
most and do their duty best', and the 'litany money',
paid until about 1692. (fn. 216) Moreover by the time of
Lloyd's arrival at Lichfield the stipends themselves
had become inadequate, and the vicars had been
forced to look for supplementary sources of income,
laymen for jobs and clergy for benefices. To increase
the stipends the reserved rents from the vicars'
property had to be raised; Lloyd ordered that the
income from this source should be raised to £480,
which would give each vicar £40 a year. Until this
was done the vicars were forbidden to renew leases
of any portions of their common property without
doubling the reserved rent. When each vicar had
been provided with £40 a year in this way none was
to take any additional job or benefice. (fn. 217)
Little evidence appears to have survived concerning services at the cathedral in the years
immediately following the Restoration. As was
commonly the case throughout the country at this
period, (fn. 218) celebrations of Holy Communion appear to
have been rare. In October 1664 the dean and
chapter ordered that 'for the present' there should
be at least four celebrations a year, on Christmas
Day, Easter Day, Whit Sunday, and the first
Sunday after Michaelmas. Other celebrations were
to be held 'as there shall be occasion and as the dean
and chapter shall think fitting'. (fn. 219) The following year,
at a meeting presided over by Hacket, it was decided
that in future there should be a celebration on the
first Sunday in each month, (fn. 220) presumably in
addition to the four celebrations laid down in 1664.
How long this practice lasted is unknown. It had
evidently lapsed by 1683, when Addison informed
Archbishop Sancroft that he had begun a monthly
Communion which he hoped to continue 'with
comfort'; but, he added, he could not 'promise
anything of success should I attempt it oftener'. (fn. 221)
In 1663 Dr. Paul's visitation articles for the vicars
choral asked them what they remembered of the
6 a.m. weekday services 'in order to the restoration
thereof when God shall please to fit the church'. (fn. 222)
Nothing, however, appears to have been done, and
it was not until the beginning of Lloyd's episcopate
that the early-morning service in the Lady Chapel
was revived. The bishop gave instructions that
morning prayers were to be read 'after the parochial
manner' in the chapel as before the war; the hour,
however, was altered to 7 a.m. between Michaelmas
and the Annunciation and the residentiaries' duty of
hospitality to the vicars was commuted for an annual
payment of £12 10s., £2 10s. of which was allotted
to the subsacrist. (fn. 223) Matins was to be celebrated at
10 a.m. and evensong at 4 p.m. (fn. 224) Lloyd also laid
down that in future the first part of the Litany was
to be sung by a priest vicar or by a priest vicar and a
lay vicar together instead of by two lay vicars - the
traditional Lichfield practice embodied in Hacket's
code. He further lifted Hacket's restrictions on
priest vicars who did not hold priests' stalls and
who, under Hacket's statutes, were allowed to take
only lay parts in services. (fn. 225)
The cathedral music appears to have been fully
restored by 1663. There were nine vicars in residence
and a number of choristers, and the choristers' music
school had been reopened. (fn. 226) The only hint of past
uncertainties comes with an inquiry into the behaviour of the organist: did he, as was the ancient
custom, play a voluntary before the first lesson after
the psalmody? 'And is it grave or apt? For ye know
how he hath been accused that hath been in that
office.' (fn. 227) Of the ability of the vicars and choristers it
is impossible to judge; it may be noted, however,
that after a trial of candidate vicars in June 1663 the
man chosen as a probationer by the chapter was one
whom eight of the nine vicars had pronounced
unsuitable for the post. He was dismissed sixteen
months later. (fn. 228) By 1665 the cathedral possessed, in
addition to ten folio service books, six books containing 'all the ditties of the anthems in print'; (fn. 229) but
a few months later Bishop Hacket intervened to
replace the customary anthem after the sermon by a
psalm. There were objections from members of the
chapter at this interference with cathedral services.
It was claimed that the alteration gave offence to
gentry and clergy, with the further comment that 'it
is not difficult to foresee how nauseous church music
and common prayer will again become if Hopkins
and Sternhold's rhythms may jostle out our anthems,
and a long pulpit-prayer seduce the devotions of the
common people'. The bishop, however, appears to
have got his way. (fn. 230) Things seem to have been back
to normal by 1676. Roger North later considered
that a Sunday service which he had attended at the
cathedral at that date had been performed 'with more
harmony and less huddle than I have known it in
any church in England, except of late in St. Paul's'. (fn. 231)
From 1700 to the Cathedrals Act
Between 1700 and the Cathedrals Act of 1840 there
were various changes in the constitution of the
cathedral. The most important of these related to
the number of residentiaries. Bishop Lloyd's scheme
for raising an endowment to provide for the reestablishment of the two residentiaryships abolished
by Bishop Overton was abandoned in 1703. At a
general chapter held in September of that year Dr.
William Binckes, the newly-elected dean, put
forward a plan of his own. Under this adequately
endowed additional residentiaryships would be
created by bestowing more than one prebend on a
canon, to whom the bishop would then assign a
prebendal house in the Close. The chapter approved
the plan; but since it affected the bishop's patronage
and required parliamentary sanction it was referred
to Bishop Hough. The dean and chapter pointed
out to the bishop that the cathedral revenues could
not be raised sufficiently to provide for further
residentiaries and asked for his support in obtaining
an Act to consolidate several prebends. They wished
to raise the number of residentiaries to eight or
more, and appointed a standing committee to
co-operate with the bishop in the matter and to act
on their behalf. (fn. 232)
In 1706 an Act was obtained which aimed at
bringing the residentiary chapter up to nine. The
bishop was empowered to confer two or more
prebends on one person, provided that the total of
the reserved rents of such prebends did not exceed
£70 a year; anyone collated to a second prebend
was to bind himself to perform the residence
required by the cathedral statutes from the time
that he got his prebendal house and a £45 a year
income from reserved rents. In view of the low
income of the deanery the Duchy of Lancaster
rectory of Tatenhill was vested, from its next
vacancy, in the dean. Prebends worth less than £4 a
year in reserved rents were to be vested in the dean
and chapter when they fell vacant and were to become
part of the common fund property. The bishop, for
his part, was to receive the prebend of Eccleshall for
himself and his successors when it next fell vacant. (fn. 233)
Whether by accident or design the Act was
drafted in a way which worked very much to the
disadvantage of the residentiaries appointed under
the new scheme. (fn. 234) These canons residentiary of the
New Foundation were allotted by the Act neither a
vote in the residentiary chapter nor a share in the
common revenues of the chapter, and successive
local statutes emphasized the fact that they were, so
to speak, the poor relations of the residentiaries of
the Old Foundation. Bishop Chandler's 1720
statutes, for example, reserved to the residentiaries
of the Old Foundation the election of residentiaries,
the appointment of the chapter clerk and the verger,
and the management of the common fund; they
also laid down that the fabric fund was to be managed
solely by the Old Foundation and was not to be
touched by the New. In the cathedral hierarchy
residentiaries of the New Foundation were to be
placed after the Old Foundation residentiaries, and
they were to pay only half the admission fees
demanded of residentiaries of the Old Foundation.
If in course of time they became residentiaries of
the Old Foundation the £30 which they had paid
into the fabric fund at the time of their original
admission was to be transferred to the common fund
together with an additional £36 13s. 4d. to make up
the traditional 100-mark entry fine.
The residentiaries of the New Foundation thus
faced all the disadvantages of residence with none
of the compensating advantages, and Chandler's
statutes had to make provision against the possibility
that a man with the necessary qualifications would
refuse to accept a residentiaryship. (fn. 235) In the opinion
of residentiaries of the Old Foundation the new
residentiaries were merely there to aid and assist
them, chiefly by lightening the burden of compulsory
residence. Under Chandler's statutes the new
residentiaries were obliged to reside 45 consecutive
days a year if the income of their prebends amounted
to £55 or 38 consecutive days if it did not. The
actual dates were to be settled at the residentiary
chapter's main yearly meeting, the Michaelmas
audit. By the time of Bishop Frederick Cornwallis's
statutes of 1752 there were three residentiaries of
the New Foundation, and the statutes laid down
more exact arrangements. In each of the four
quarters into which the year was still divided a
residentiary of the Old Foundation was to be in
residence for two consecutive calendar months and
a residentiary of the New Foundation for one
calendar month. A residentiary of the Old Foundation was to pay a 5s. fine to the fabric fund each
time he was absent from a cathedral service during
his first month's residence and 2s. 6d. for each
absence during his second month's residence; a
residentiary of the New Foundation was to pay 5s.
for absence during his month. With the four
residentiaries of the Old Foundation and the three
residentiaries of the New this ensured that there
would be a canon in residence for eleven months of
the year; the remaining month was to be filled by
the three New Foundation residentiaries in rotation
until the creation of a fourth residentiary of the New
Foundation. During this month fines for absence
were reduced to 2s. 6d. to maintain equality with the
arrangements for Old Foundation residentiaries.
As for periods of residence, the New Foundation
residentiaries had to wait until the others had
made their choice. The only advantage they gained
from the statutes was a decision that they should
join in presenting to lay vicars' stalls in future. (fn. 236)
This unsatisfactory state of affairs, with the New
Foundation residentiaries receiving nothing from
the common fund and having no say in most of the
important capitular decisions, persisted until almost
the end of the 18th century. Finally, at the 1796
audit, the chapter decided to ask leave to bring in a
Bill to explain and amend the 1706 Act, make
further provision for the residentiaries, and provide
an addition to the fabric fund. (fn. 237)
The preamble to the 1797 Act revising the
constitution of the cathedral pointed out the
disadvantages which the last Act had brought with
it and emphasized the benefits which would follow
if all residentiaries participated in the work of the
residentiary chapter. The revenues of the residentiary chapter were, as things stood, insufficient
to maintain even four residentiaries, but if an
addition were made to the income of the residentiaries of the Old Foundation by amalgamating
prebends it would be possible to establish six
residentiaries with equal shares in the revenues of
the common fund. The Act therefore laid down that
the residentiary chapter was to consist of the dean
and of six canons who were to have the powers and
authority of the four existing residentiaries of the
Old Foundation. The dean was to receive annually
one fifth of the income of the common fund, plus
£42 18s. for his commons (the existing arrangement); after the deduction of these sums the income
of the common fund was to be divided equally
among the six residentiaries. The bishop, not the
chapter, was to appoint the residentiaries; a man so
appointed was to be installed forthwith by the dean
and residentiary chapter, without any election. The
residentiaryships were to be known as the 1st, 2nd,
3rd, 4th, 5th, and 6th residentiaryships; each
residentiary was allotted a house in the Close and a
sixth of the annual dividend from the common fund.
The First Residentiary was to hold the prebend of
Colwich, and that of Bishop's Itchington, with the
precentorship, when it fell vacant; the Second was
to have the prebends of Alrewas (with the chancellorship) and Weeford, when they fell vacant; the Third
was to hold the rich prebend of Sawley, with the
treasurership; the Fourth was allotted the prebends
of Ryton and Prees; the Fifth those of Offley and
Flixton; and the Sixth those of Freeford and
Hansacre. The Act was to come into effect when
either the prebend of Alrewas or that of Weeford
fell vacant. Each of the six was to be in residence
for two calendar months each year under the same
conditions as those applying to the existing
residentiaries of the Old Foundation.
Various financial concessions were made to the
new residentiary chapter. The prebendal house in
the Close which had been occupied by the late
Richard Jackson, Prebendary of Colwich and Prees,
was to become part of the property of the fabric
fund, as were the prebends of Tervin and Stotfold
when they next fell vacant. In addition future
treasurers were to give the fabric fund a fifth of all
fines, rents, and other receipts from their prebend of
Sawley after the deduction of the traditional reserved
rent of £66 13s. 4d. and of the profits of the rectory
of St. Philip's, Birmingham. Members of the
residentiary chapter were encouraged to spend their
own money on repairs or improvements to their
houses in the Close by a clause laying down that if
any dean or canon, with the bishop's approval,
should spend between £100 and £800 in this way
he or his heirs might recover a proportion of the
cost from his successor. The bishop, whose patronage was diminished by the Act, received as compensation the advowsons of certain vicarages belonging
to the dean and chapter — Colwich, Bishop's
Itchington (Warws.), Tachbrook (Warws.), Longdon, High Offley, and Tarvin (Ches.). (fn. 238)
The Act came into force with the death of Richard
Farmer, the chancellor and Prebendary of Alrewas,
in the autumn of 1797 (fn. 239) and regulated the constitution of the residentiary chapter until the Cathedrals
Act of 1840. The various minor adjustments which
accompanied the major reform appear to have been
made smoothly. The 1799 audit, for example,
reorganized the system of chapter patronage so as
to provide presentations for the new residentiaries;
and when in 1803 the prebends of Tervin and
Stotfold became part of the fabric property on the
death of Dr. Samuel Smalbroke, that year's audit
ordered a survey of the two prebends and a reallotment of the preaching turns. (fn. 240)
A printed sheet of about 1796, arguing the case
for a revision of the Act of 1706, noted amongst
other things that the residentiaries of the New
Foundation, not having been allowed any powers in
the residentiary chapter, were seldom in residence;
indeed two of their houses were ruinous. (fn. 241) Nonresidence was not, however, confined to the New
Foundation residentiaries. At Bishop Hough's
visitation in 1703 the dean asked that the statute
allowing one residentiary to perform another's
residence might be interpreted in such a way as to
allow one month's personal residence to suffice, with
the rest being performed by another residentiary.
In 1738 during his visitation of the cathedral
Bishop Smalbroke censured the non-residence of
certain of the residentiaries, which had been 'too
frequently practised for long intervals of time, to
the great offence of many observing persons'. The
act books of the hebdomadary chapter, starting in
1709, reveal much absenteeism throughout the 18th
century and the early part of the nineteenth.
Between 1748 and 1772, for example, very little
business was done in the hebdomadary chapter, the
dean and all the residentiaries sometimes being away
at the same time. (fn. 242) Those who had no particular
business in Lichfield avoided residence and saved
paying the statutory fines by persuading other, more
amenable, colleagues to perform part at least of
their residence for them. This practice drew a formal
protest from the precentor, Thomas Smalbroke, in
1754. (fn. 243) His argument was that residentiaries who
resided by proxy were virtually defrauding the
fabric fund by avoiding payment of fines for nonresidence; and when, from 1758 to 1761, the
practice was forbidden the chapter's declared
reason was the bad state of the fabric and the need
to supplement the fabric fund. (fn. 244) When the demands
on the fabric fund were not so heavy, residence was
not so strictly enforced; in 1778 and 1781, for
example, the dean and residentiaries were often
away, and between mid-November 1805 and April
1806 all the members of the residentiary chapter
were absent. (fn. 245) At the 1837 audit 'the probability of
some of the canons being prevented by illness from
keeping their residences . . . formed the subject of
conversation'. It was duly decided that, 'if on any
future occasion of this nature it should be proposed
by any member of the chapter not keeping his
residence to offer pecuniary compensation to any
other canon willing to keep his residence for him, it
be understood that such an arrangement will not
be objected to by the body'. (fn. 246) The residentiaries
were not, however, willing to grant others the
latitude they allowed themselves; in 1759 the
divinity lecturer was warned that he must be in
constant residence according to the terms of
foundation of the lectureship. (fn. 247)
Relations between the chapter and the bishop were
generally good during the period. The only serious
breach occurred during Smalbroke's prolonged
visitation of the cathedral from 1737 to 1739. Besides
the non-residence of certain of the canons the bishop
found numerous causes for complaint, such as the
canons' failure to register prebendal leases, (fn. 248) the
chapter's reluctance to provide an adequate stipend
for the Vicar of St. Mary's, Lichfield, (fn. 249) and the
negligence of the sacrist. (fn. 250) The bishop's persistence,
his complaints about the slowness with which the
chapter answered his articles of inquiry and the
imprecision of their answers, and his apparent
intention to conduct a visitation of the vicars choral,
provoked the chapter into an assertion of its rights.
It denied that the jurisdiction of the dean and
chapter over the vicars choral was suspended during
an episcopal visitation or that the regular capitular
visitation of the cathedral body devolved upon the
bishop during his visitation. An episcopal visitation did not, it was claimed, extend to the profits
or ecclesiastical jurisdiction of any member of the
chapter, save in cases of neglect or default. 'If it
were otherwise your Lordship might from time to
time find some cause or other for adjournment of
your visitation and thereby make it perpetual and
entirely destroy the jurisdiction of the dean as well
as dean and chapter, which we neither apprehend
your Lordship intends nor the Composition [of
1428] or local statutes of the church'. (fn. 251) Smalbroke
in reply insisted that the chapter had entirely
misunderstood his intentions. He was asking for
nothing but his canonical rights when he claimed
that all inferior jurisdictions were suspended during
an episcopal visitation and that several branches of
the chapter's jurisdiction devolved upon him during
a visitation; it was in fact questionable 'whether the
denial of such a power can be excused by any thing
but by an unacquaintance with the Canon Law',
especially when the denial was accompanied by such
a misinterpretation of his motives. (fn. 252)
The chapter maintained friendly relations with
the Lichfield authorities during these years. In some
instances concern for the feelings of local tradesmen
coincided with concern for the dignity of the Close.
Some time after the Civil War the Lichfield guild
of corvisors and curriers had complained to the
chapter about a 'foreigner' who had set up business
in the Close. Their petition was probably successful,
for in 1717 the dean forbade one of the inhabitants
of the Close to take a bridle-cutter into his house,
saying that he 'would not admit any person that
followed a trade to come into the Close to live'. (fn. 253)
No attempts appear to have been made to infringe
the liberty of the Close, and the chapter continued
to appoint its own J.P.s and overseers of the poor. (fn. 254)
In 1738 it was stated that £13 was distributed
annually among the poor of the Close in breadmoney; the poor also benefited from 'an hospitality
not to be named'. (fn. 255) The payment of bread-money
ceased in 1767 because the weekly payments to the
poor of the Close far exceeded the offering money
and there was a deficiency of £23. (fn. 256)
In the early 1720s there was a brief squabble with
the parishioners of St. Michael's, Lichfield. Canons
who had a statutory duty to deliver a certain number
of afternoon sermons at the church vel per se vel per
alium found it inconvenient to walk to the church in
bad weather and asked the churchwardens for
permission to ride up to the church door in a coach.
The request was turned down. The canons retaliated
by taking refuge in the letter of the statute and
sending one of the vicars (whom they provided with
'a set of very good printed sermons for the whole
year') to preach in their place, a move which greatly
annoyed the parishioners. Finally the matter came to
the ears of the bishop, the churchwardens were
persuaded to rescind their ban, and harmony was
restored. (fn. 257)
The period saw little change in the cathedral's
estate policy, which remained essentially unaltered,
with the chapter and the individual canons continuing to lease their estates as before. Most
improvements to prebendal estates can probably be
attributed to the efforts of the farmers. In the
years between 1694 and 1739, for example, the
estates in and around Lichfield were 'generally
improved nine parts in twelve' by inclosure; the
acreage of arable land was 'vastly increased' and
that of pasture declined. The farmers benefited from
increased corn and grain tithes and the Vicar of St.
Mary's, Lichfield, to whom the tithes of wool and
lambs were allotted, suffered proportionately. (fn. 258) The
chapter reaped the benefits of agricultural improvements through increased entry and renewal fines
rather than by higher rents. When in 1766 it was
decided that the lease of the tithes of Litton (Derb.)
should not be renewed but instead offered to the
highest bidder, the reason given was that the
existing tenant had refused to increase the fine
although the commons had recently been inclosed
and ploughed, thereby swelling his yield from corn
and grain tithes and diminishing the chapter's wool
and lamb tithes. (fn. 259) The general rule appears to have
been that up to 1755 the entry fine was equivalent
to a year's return, at current valuation, from the
property leased. In that year, because of the
lowering of the rate of interest and the consequent
increase in the value of leases, the chapter decided
that in future lessees should pay fines of 1¼ year's
value. This was raised to 1½ year's value for
septennial renewals in 1778 and for all leases in
1783. (fn. 260)
The problems of management were similarly
unchanged. Complaints came at intervals during the
earlier 18th century about the failure of canons to
register leases of their prebendal estates in the
chapter lease-book. In 1703, for example, it was
reported that no fewer than six canons had failed to
register leases, while in 1738 Bishop Smalbroke
ordered the institution of systematic inspection and
registration, with tenants being ordered to bring in
terriers or surveys to be deposited in the registry. (fn. 261)
Sufficient information always appears to have been
available, however, at least for the more accessible
parts of the capitular estates; Smalbroke himself was
well-informed about the property around Lichfield. (fn. 262) In 1775 the chapter was employing a
land-surveyor, John Renshaw. (fn. 263)
Between 1700 and 1800 the revenues of the
common fund from fee farms, other farms, pensions,
Peak revenues, and rents remained virtually static,
seldom falling below £460 a year and only once
rising over £500. The surplus for division after the
payment of commons and other charges generally
varied between £60 and £90, though it occasionally
dropped as low as £15 and in at least one year
exceeded £100. (fn. 264) Commons and dividend, however,
formed only a comparatively small part of the
residentiaries' income; far more important were the
fines received from lessees of the common property.
Even so, Lichfield was not a wealthy cathedral.
About 1796 it was estimated that over the past
10 years the four residentiaryships of the Old
Foundation had each been worth, upon an average,
£124 1s. 7½d. a year, and it was argued that one of
the merits of the proposed Act (of 1797) would be
the creation of five residentiaryships worth about
£300 a year each and a sixth, the treasurership, which
on account of the increased value of the prebend of
Sawley would be worth much more. (fn. 265)
The figures published in 1835 by the royal
commission inquiring into ecclesiastical revenues
show that during the three years ending in 1831 the
average annual income of the common fund was
£1,638 gross, £1,311 net. Just over £1,000 of the
gross income came from fines, some £560 from
reserved rents, and the remainder from various
other unnamed minor sources. (fn. 266) Lichfield had the
smallest common fund of any English cathedral save
Chester, though it is true that the common fund of
York provided only some £40 net a year more. (fn. 267)
From it the dean drew annually an average of £279
in commons and dividend and each of the six
residentiaries an average of £172. (fn. 268) The individual
prebendal estates differed widely in value. The dean
was by far the wealthiest member of the chapter,
with an average net annual income from his prebend
and the annexed rectory of Tatenhill of just over
£1,500; next came the treasurer, with some £670
a year from the prebend of Sawley, and then the
Fourth Residentiary with about £340. The other
canons — the precentor, the chancellor, the Fifth
and Sixth Residentiaries, and the 14 non-residentiaries— received regularly little more than
nominal reserved rents from their prebendal estates:
the precentor £23, the chancellor £46, the Fifth
Residentiary £44, the Sixth Residentiary £51, and
none of the non-residentiaries more than £20.
Income from fines was considerable but irregular;
in the three years ending in 1831 the dean received
nothing from this source while the precentor
received a total of £1,295, the chancellor £895, and
the treasurer £1,350. (fn. 269) This did not of course
exhaust the sources of income available to the
canons. All the residentiaries and all, save apparently
two, of the non-residentiaries were pluralists. Dean
Woodhouse's rich rectory of Stoke-upon-Trent
(which he resigned in 1831) brought him a net annual
income of over £2,500 and the rectory of Donington
(Salop.) another £573. Similarly the precentor,
Anthony Hamilton, held the rectories of Loughton
(Essex) and St. Mary-le-Bow (London), together
worth over £800 net, besides the archdeaconry of
Taunton (Som.) with its annexed stall at Wells. (fn. 270)
During this period the organization and status of
the vicars remained virtually unchanged. Shortly
after the Restoration their numbers had settled at
twelve — five priest vicars, including the subchanter, and seven lay vicars, including the organist
— and no alteration was subsequently made. (fn. 271) In
general they were a well-behaved body. There were
occasional black sheep, (fn. 272) but there is little to
compare with the more spectacular misdoings of
previous centuries.
The chapter's chief ground for complaint was
absenteeism. Each vicar was entitled to one day off
duty a week (the 'sine' or 'ensign' days), but for
some this was evidently insufficient. In 1734,
on Bishop Smalbroke's orders, the subchanter
delivered a lecture to the vicars on the evils of absenteeism. As he subsequently reported to the
bishop, most of the vicars performed their duties
conscientiously. The trouble was caused mainly by
a minority of absentees over whose movements he
appears to have had little or no control despite the
fact that penalties for absence were being strictly
enforced. The chief offender was the sacrist, Henry
Perkins, 'nominal or pretended rector' of Barwick
in Elmet (Yorks. W.R.). He was away from Lichfield
for more than two-thirds of the year, seldom
attended services when he was resident, and had
infringed the cathedral statutes by not appointing
another vicar to act as his deputy. A second vicar
was a chronic invalid and often available for only
three months in the year; two more had been away
from Lichfield for some time. Thus whenever any
of the remaining vicars failed to attend a service
the choir was left 'almost destitute'. The subchanter
promised that there would be a further tightening
of discipline, and the chapter ordered Perkins to
return to his duties on pain of deprivation. (fn. 273) In 1753
it was decided that any vicar absent from duty for
more than a week should lose his commons until his
return to duty, even if he had obtained leave of
absence; if he stayed away for more than a fortnight
he was in addition to pay a fine of 2d. a day into the
fabric fund. A vicar who was in Lichfield and
missed a cathedral service was to lose his commons
for the day and pay a 2d. fine. (fn. 274) In 1770, 1774, and
1777 the vicars were officially warned to attend
services more regularly and their attention was
drawn to the oath which they had taken upon their
admission. (fn. 275) From 1779 vicars had to submit the
reasons for any absence in writing to the chapter. (fn. 276)
There appears to have been no marked increase
in the revenue of the corporation. Despite Bishop
Lloyd's attention to the revenue from reserved
rents (fn. 277) this rose very little. In 1718 priest vicars were
still receiving a dividend of only £14 3s. 3d. from
reserved rents and lay vicars one of £12 3s. 3d. With
each vicar receiving about £7 17s. in commons,
pensions, stall-money, and other payments, priests
had a basic income of about £22 and laymen one of
about £20. (fn. 278) Bishop Chandler's statute of 1720,
which laid down that in future the vicars were not
to lease any of their common property unless a
quarter or a fifth were added to the existing reserved
rent, also allowed various exceptions from this rule:
when, for example, the leases were of land worth less
than £10 a year attached to houses in Lichfield
paying customary rents. (fn. 279) All this marked a retreat
from Lloyd's instructions to double the reserved
rents, and income from this source never approached
the target of £480 a year which Lloyd had set. In a
period of nearly 50 years, from 1732 to 1780, it rose
from just over £194 a year to some £242; by about
1830 it was still only £253 a year. (fn. 280) There were also
fines, which evidently provided the greater part of
the vicars' corporate income. In the years 1828-31
the vicars had an average annual income of £804
gross, £770 net; of the gross income £551 came
from fines and the rest from reserved rents. The net
revenues were divided equally save that the five
priest vicars each received £2 more than the seven
lay vicars from the reserved rents. The only member
of the corporation with an additional income was the
subchanter, who received various annual payments
amounting to £7. (fn. 281) Individual vicars thus received between £60 and £70 a year, in addition to their houses
and the commons provided by the dean and chapter.
When the dean and chapter visited the vicars in
1723 the latter stated that they had one church,
Chesterton, appropriated to them, adding 'there
may [be] some others have been lost for aught we
know, but how or where to recover them we know
not'. (fn. 282) In fact the appropriated church of Penn
appears to have been lost at some date between 1706
and 1714. (fn. 283) The appropriation was later recovered,
however, (fn. 284) and during the greater part of the 18th
century and in the early 19th century the vicars
seem to have organized their affairs quite efficiently,
keeping their houses in the Close in good repair (fn. 285)
and, between 1756 and 1759, building themselves a
'new, commodious muniment house'. (fn. 286)
The early years of the 19th century saw various
changes with regard to the choristers. In 1806 the
number was reduced from ten to eight, (fn. 287) and in
late 1817 or in 1818 a choristers' school was
established with the help of a gift of £100 from
Dean Woodhouse. Here the choristers were taught
reading, writing, and arithmetic and had a speciallyappointed master in charge of them. The organist
continued to be personally responsible for their
musical education. (fn. 288) During the 18th century the
organist or his deputy had taught the boys singing,
and mention is made of a singing school in the anteroom of the cathedral library in 1772, and of a
practice room for the older boys in the Vicars'
College in 1802; (fn. 289) but there appears to be no definite
evidence concerning the boys' general education.
Possibly, since all were local boys, they were taught
in Lichfield itself. They each received £2 a year until
1770, when their stipends were increased to £3. In
1800 it was decided that newly-admitted choristers
should receive £3 a year but that as the older boys
left the choir the stipends of the younger boys should
be increased, according to their merit, on the
recommendation of the subchanter. Since the
previous year the boys had received supplementary
payments of 14s. or 15s. each a year from chapter
funds. (fn. 290) When in 1806 the number of choristers was
reduced to eight, the stipends were considerably
increased for the older boys: the two eldest each
received £10 a year, the next pair £8, the next pair
£6, and the two youngest £4. Further increases
followed in 1812 and 1825. (fn. 291) Apart from this the
boys came to the chapter's attention only when their
surplices were grubby or their behaviour in church
fell below the required standard. (fn. 292)
Except when there was a sermon, the choir was
the only part of the cathedral used for services. This
caused difficulties until the time of Wyatt's restoration of the building; his scheme of throwing the
choir and the Lady Chapel together was welcomed
by the chapter, since it provided greater accommodation for the congregation and enabled sermons to
be preached in the choir. It is in fact probable that
the idea came from the chapter. (fn. 293) Previously,
whenever there was a sermon, the inhabitants of the
Close were obliged to move from the choir into the
nave in order to hear it, 'a circumstance very
awkward, disagreeable, and troublesome'. A large
number of people also came up from the city, where
sermons appear to have been infrequent. Afterwards
those who intended to communicate returned into
the choir, 'the sacrament being administered there
every Sunday if there is a proper number of
communicants'. (fn. 294)
In 1752 Bishop Frederick Cornwallis made various
adjustments to the hours of services. The early
morning prayers were in future to be celebrated in
the Lady Chapel at 7.30 a.m. from Michaelmas to
the Annunciation and at 6.30 a.m. during the rest of
the year. On weekdays matins was to be at 10.30
a.m. from Michaelmas to the Annunciation and at
10 a.m. during the rest of the year. Evensong
remained at the usual time, 4 p.m. On Sundays
matins was to begin at 10.30 a.m. all the year round
and evensong at 4.30 p.m. (fn. 295) In 1779 new regulations
were laid down for Passion Week services: the organ
was not to be used and services were to be read 'in a
parochial way'. (fn. 296)
The 18th century saw an increased insistence on
decorum in the conduct of services. Though it was
stated at the beginning of the century that a
customary rule allowed vicars to be credited with
attendance at a service if they reached their stalls
before the first Gloria of the psalms, (fn. 297) steps were
taken a few years later to ensure that once they were
in their stalls they stayed until the end of the service.
Dean Kimberley considered it 'very scandalous and
offensive' that many vicars should leave the church
when prayers ended and before the sermon began;
in future, he directed, vicars were to stay for the
sermon. (fn. 298) The Sacheverell affair evidently had its
repercussions in Lichfield, for in 1710 the chapter
moved to prevent the preaching of inflammatory or
controversial sermons in the cathedral. (fn. 299)
The later 18th century evidently saw a marked
improvement in the cathedral's music. Probably this
is to be attributed to the efforts of John Alcock,
organist and master of the choristers 1749-60, for
the standard of musicianship before his arrival seems
to have been somewhat undistinguished. (fn. 300) In 1723
the vicars reported that although they knew of no
occasion on which a candidate had been admitted
through bribery 'sometimes we have had reason to
think some of our body's judgements much biassed
and their testimonies too partial' — apparently a
hint that some unsatisfactory singers had been
accepted. Nine years later they were more positive
about the choristers: the boys were quite wellbehaved, 'but as to their natural abilities with
respect to music they are not the most promising'. (fn. 301)
In 1732 the vicars reported that 'the organ is out of
repair, all our books imperfect, and no dinner for
the preacher on a Sunday'. (fn. 302) Alcock, a competent
and experienced musician and a former pupil of the
blind organist John Stanley, appears to have brought
with him new efficiency. His Divine Harmony,
published in 1752, contained a collection of 55
chants which he had composed for the use of the
cathedral, and he noted in the preface that these
were 'not much more than half the number I've
composed for this church'. He had also accumulated
a valuable collection of services and anthems by
various composers, which he doubtless put to use at
Lichfield. (fn. 303) Eventually a breach of some sort
occurred between him and the other vicars. In 1760
his colleagues formally complained that he spoilt the
services 'by playing improperly, indecently, and
perversely on the organ with design to confound and
prevent the vicars from the due performance of
their duty in singing the said services and anthems'.
The chapter admonished him to behave in future
and he left the cathedral. (fn. 304) The choir continued,
however, to be well-served. Boswell was 'very much
delighted' with the music when he attended a
service at the cathedral in 1776. Vicars visited
London to sing in oratorios and public concerts
there, and when a visitor called at the cathedral in
1799 he noted that several of the vicars were 'names
of celebrity in the musical world' and that the
choristers sang 'exceeding well'. (fn. 305) When lay vicars
were required in the early 19th century the chapter
advertised not only in the Birmingham newspapers
but also in those at London and Bath. (fn. 306)
The cathedral fabric needed little work done upon
it, apart from care and maintenance, for a hundred
years after the 17th-century restoration. During the
1730s, for example, payments out of the fabric fund
were usually small, and in 1738 Bishop Smalbroke
was informed that the building was in good repair
'except in the roof, where there is some defect'. (fn. 307)
In 1749 many of the statues on the west front were
removed, in 1758 the rose-window on the south face
of the south transept was restored, and in 1765-6
the upper part of the north-west spire was rebuilt; (fn. 308)
but no large-scale work was begun until the 1770s.
By 1772 the roof had become dangerous. At least
two surveys were made of it in that year and the next,
and various plans for making it safe were submitted
to the chapter. That finally adopted appears to have
been the one proposed by Thomas Webb, somewhat
modified by William Newbolt. The lead was
gradually stripped from the roof and sold, while the
timber framework, evidently the cause of the anxiety,
was removed and replaced. The new framework
lowered the pitch of the roof and reduced its area
by over 6,000 sq. ft.; this, and the replacement of
the lead covering by Westmorland slates, must have
lessened the cost of reconstruction considerably.
Even so, the work, which went on from 1774 to
1778, involved the chapter in heavy expense: £525
10s. was paid for 205 tons of slates, and at least
£547 10s. was spent 'on account of the roof' and for
timber. Nevertheless the sale of the lead which had
formerly covered the roof may have enabled the
chapter to recoup the cost, with enough money left
to lay a new floor and clean the inside of the cathedral, as had been planned in 1772. (fn. 309)
Soon after the reroofing had been completed the
chapter was considering further restoration and
reconstruction. In 1781 it asked the Staffordshireborn James Wyatt to make a survey of the proposed
alterations in the nave, the choir, and the Lady
Chapel, and it was under his direction that the
work was completed between 1788 and 1795. (fn. 310) The
period between the first approach to Wyatt and the
beginning of the work was spent by the chapter in
fund-raising. Bishop James Cornwallis took a keen
interest in the proposed 'improvements' and was a
liberal subscriber, while members of the chapter
not only subscribed themselves but were urged to
rouse local support. Cornwallis estimated that the
scheme would cost £4,000; Wyatt, however, stated
that the cost would be over £5,950. By 1788 £5,200
had been raised by subscription. To this the chapter
added £1,800 which it had borrowed, and Wyatt
could begin. (fn. 311)
Lichfield was the first cathedral in which Wyatt's
plans for restoration were actually carried out, and
his aims — uniformity of style and the creation of
sweeping, uncluttered 'vistas' — were those which
he later pursued elsewhere. (fn. 312) His work here, as at
other cathedrals, was later savagely criticized; but
his contemporaries agreed that restoration work was
urgently needed at Lichfield (fn. 313) and his clients not
only approved of his alterations to the cathedral but
in fact probably dictated them. The principal object
of the restoration was to enlarge the choir, so that
it could contain the whole congregation. Wyatt
effected this by removing the 'elegant stone screen'
between the choir and the Lady Chapel, and also
Dean Smalwood's Classical reredos which stood
before it. (fn. 314) The latter, which Celia Fiennes had
admired in 1697, (fn. 315) was now regarded as a monstrosity; Pennant in 1780 considered that 'the beauty
of the choir was much impaired' by it, and Stebbing
Shaw agreed, calling it 'a sad mass of deformity'. (fn. 316)
The materials of the stone screen were repaired and
used as a base for the organ. The new choir, formed
out of the choir and the Lady Chapel, provided the
required accommodation and did not in general
offend the aesthetic susceptibilities of a Gothicizing
public, though before long there were complaints
that it was too long — 'it is all seeing and no hearing'. (fn. 317) The pews and pulpit were removed from the
nave, the stalls in the choir were repainted, new
floors were put in — Derbyshire stone in the nave
and grey and white marble in the choir — and a
new freestone altar, 'elegantly sculptured', was put
at the east end of the former Lady Chapel. (fn. 318) To
render the new, enlarged choir more self-contained
and easier to keep warm, Wyatt blocked up the four
easternmost arches on both sides of the choir, the
only ones which were still open, by building a plain
walled screen flush with the inner arches. (fn. 319)
In other parts of the cathedral he undertook some
substantial rebuilding. The weight of the stone
vaults in the roof of the nave was threatening to
bring down the walls; this was remedied by taking
down five of them and replacing them by plaster, 'in
consequence of which the walls . . . have not now a
twentieth part of the weight to sustain'. (fn. 320) The roofs
of the aisles were raised; much of the central spire
was taken down and rebuilt; windows, doors, pillars,
and capitals were restored; walls and roof were
scraped and whitewashed; new glass was inserted;
and two great buttresses were erected to support the
south transept. (fn. 321) The restoration, which cost in all
some £8,000, was completed in 1795 with the
addition of a stained glass window after a design by
Sir Joshua Reynolds at the east end of the
cathedral. (fn. 322)
At least one other architect appears to have been
employed under Wyatt's general supervision to
carry out part of the work: at the 1794 audit it was
agreed that Joseph Potter of Lichfield should repair
and secure the 'south spires' of the cathedral and be
allowed his reasonable expenses. (fn. 323) Francis Eginton
of Handsworth was responsible for the stained glass.
He executed the east window and was commissioned
by the chapter to do other work in the cathedral. (fn. 324)
The restoration left the fabric fund about £2,700
in debt, (fn. 325) and various other alterations now made
necessary were paid for out of the common fund;
the bishop's consistory court, for example, had been
removed during Wyatt's restoration of the interior
of the cathedral, and the chapter had to fit up a new
one in the vestry in the south aisle. (fn. 326) In 1797 Dean
Proby came to the chapter's aid with a loan which
enabled it to pay the bills still due on the fabric
account. (fn. 327) In 1799, however, it was decided to erect
a screen in front of the organ and glaze it 'in order
to render the choir less inconvenient during the
winter months'; the cost, £180, had to be defrayed
by £20 subscriptions from the residentiaries and the
proceeds of a public appeal. (fn. 328)
The most notable addition to the cathedral came
shortly after 1800. While travelling on the Continent
in 1801 Sir Brooke Boothby of Ashbourne (Derb.)
purchased for £200 340 panels of mid-16th-century
stained glass which had come from the dissolved
Cistercian abbey of Herckenrode, some 2 miles from
Hasselt in what is now Belgium. The Peace of
Amiens the following year enabled him to bring the
glass to England and some time before the Michaelmas audit he offered it to the chapter at cost price.
The offer was gratefully accepted, as was Wyatt's
offer in 1804 to give advice on the placing of the
glass in the cathedral. Preparations for installing it
were begun in 1803, when 'a machine for new
leading the painted glass was ordered to be procured
from Birmingham'. It was finally decided to fill
seven windows in the Lady Chapel. The Revd.
W. G. Rowland of Shrewsbury was responsible for
the actual arrangement, and John (later Sir John)
Betton of Shrewsbury had the work of putting up the
glass. (fn. 329) In 1814 some remaining pieces were placed
in the south window of the east aisle of the transept. (fn. 330)
A visitor to the cathedral in 1818 noted that the
interior presented 'a most interesting and gratifying sight to the lover of neatness, harmony,
and preservation. Every part is clean, sound, and
beautiful'. Externally, however, the building had
suffered from the action of the weather on a bad
sandstone, and considerable alterations were by this
time going on under the direction of Joseph Potter
the younger of Lichfield. One of the works proposed
was a thorough repair and restoration of the west
front, 'which at present is sadly mutilated'. (fn. 331) This
proposed restoration took place in the early 1820s
and was executed principally in Roman cement.
Much of the remaining sculpture on the west front
was defaced or destroyed in the course of the work,
which was immediately attacked as 'patching and
plastering'. (fn. 332)
Apart from work on the cathedral, there was some
rebuilding going on in the Close throughout the
period. Dean Binckes, for example, reconstructed the
deanery at the beginning of the 18th century. The
building, which dated from the 15th or early 16th
century and had been badly damaged during the
Civil War, was given a new front 'with good brickwork and well set off with uniform windows'. (fn. 333) It
was probably Binckes who planted lime-trees along
the north and east sides of the Close, forming 'The
Dean's Walk'. (fn. 334)
At that time the Close must have 'presented a
somewhat unkempt appearance. In 1706 it was
reported that there were two alehouses within the
precincts, the pavement was broken up in various
places, a horse was sometimes kept in the churchyard, and there was a dunghill near the south door
of the cathedral. (fn. 335) By 1714 the alehouses were gone
but the pavements were still broken up and sometimes horses and cows were turned into the
churchyard to graze. (fn. 336) In the 1720s and 1730s there
were renewed complaints about the pavements and
the general condition of the Close, (fn. 337) but from the
middle of the century the chapter showed a new
concern about the tidiness and general appearance
of the precincts. Provision was made for cutting the
trees in the walks formed earlier in the century, and
steps were taken to keep the Close free from weeds
and rubbish. (fn. 338) In 1759 part of the churchyard was
levelled, provoking a protest from Precentor
Smalbroke, who did not think that the bones of the
dead should be disturbed. (fn. 339) In 1775 the north
doorway of the cathedral was cleared and the road
to it gravelled; in 1781 the sundial in the Close was
taken down, the paths round the cathedral were
widened and gravelled, and the road to the deanery
was made into a carriage road. (fn. 340) This concern for
tidiness led to one ludicrous episode. The sight of
the conduit which stood on the cathedral green gave
offence to two of the dignitaries, and in 1786 they
persuaded the chapter to have it taken down and
replaced by a reservoir and pump. (fn. 341) A local humorist
told the story of the demolition and its sequel. A
workman summoned up from Lichfield swore that
a reservoir would give as good a water supply as the
conduit. He was ordered to pull the conduit down.
Great was thereof the fall,
Of water few have complement,
The Bishop none at all.
What can be done in such a case,
How will they make amends?
E'en build another in its place,
And so the frolic ends. (fn. 342)
No replacement appears to have been built, however, until in 1803 an octagon brick conduit, equal
in size and capacity to the one demolished, was
erected in a corner of the Close. (fn. 343)
The quest for elegance and uniformity resulted in
the destruction of several of the medieval buildings
in the Close. The most notable loss was the late15th-century half-timbered library on the north side
of the cathedral, (fn. 344) which as early as 1724 was
thought to be 'a mean structure'. (fn. 345) In 1757 the
chapter ordered the destruction of the building,
which also contained the chapter clerk's house, on
the ground that its proximity to the cathedral
threatened the latter in case of fire. (fn. 346) The room above
the chapter-house was fitted with shelves and became the cathedral library once more. (fn. 347) In 1772 the
choristers' house was pulled down and rebuilt by
the lessee 'in an elegant style'. (fn. 348) The south gateway
to the Close was demolished in the mid 18th century, (fn. 349) and in 1800 Bishop Langton's other gateway,
at the west entrance to the Close, 'was, with a
barbarous taste, pulled down, and the materials
applied to lay the foundation of a pile of new
buildings, for the residence of necessitous widows of
clergymen'. (fn. 350)
All this is, perhaps, a reflection of the extent to
which the Close had become one of the leading
centres of polite society in the county, despite the
fact that none of the 18th- or early-19th-century
bishops of the diocese lived in their palace at
Lichfield. (fn. 351) Gilbert Walmesley (d. 1751), the
bishop's registrar and a man of taste and learning,
was for many years tenant of the palace. There he
was the head of a group of local literati and there
both Johnson and Garrick received help and
encouragement from him in their youth. (fn. 352) A few
years after Walmesley's death Thomas Seward,
Prebendary of Pipa Parva (d. 1790), moved into the
palace with his family. Seward achieved a modest
distinction as an author and as editor of the plays
of Beaumont and Fletcher, and the palace again
became 'the resort of every person in that neighbourhood who had any taste for letters'. Seward's
daughter Anna, 'the Swan of Lichfield', who
became a far more eminent figure in the literary
world, lived on at the palace until her death in
1809. (fn. 353) Another author with a home in the Close
was Erasmus Darwin, who from 1758 to 1781 lived
in a house facing Beacon Street. (fn. 354)
Reform and Reconstruction, 1840 to 1900
The conditions revealed by the 1835 Report on
Ecclesiastical Revenues and similar parliamentary
reports led to an era of reform in the Church of
England. In the rapidly growing industrial towns
money was needed to augment poor livings and to
endow new parishes, and it was felt that part of this
money could well come from capitular revenues. (fn. 355)
The Cathedrals Act of 1840 reduced the establishments of cathedrals and collegiate churches and by a
general reorganization of cathedral finances and
patronage made a considerable sum available to a
newly formed body, the Ecclesiastical Commissioners, to be redistributed where it was most needed.
Lichfield, despite its comparative poverty as a
cathedral, did not escape the workings of the Act. (fn. 356)
It was laid down that the cathedral was to lose two
of the six residentiaryships. Sawley, the richest of all,
was to be detached from the rectory of St. Philip's,
Birmingham, and suspended when it next fell vacant;
the first of the other residentiaryships to become
vacant, which in fact proved to be that of Freeford
and Hansacre, (fn. 357) was likewise to be suspended. The
endowments of the two prebends, less the sum
customarily paid out of the prebend of Sawley into
the fabric fund, were to be used by the Ecclesiastical
Commissioners to provide stipends for two Birmingham incumbents, the Rector of St. Philip's and
the perpetual curate of Christ Church. At the next
vacancy of the deanery the annexed estates were to
be transferred to the common fund or used by the
Commissioners to make proper provision for the
new dean who, it was laid down, was to have an
average income of £1,000 a year. The four remaining
residentiaries were each to have an average of £500
a year. Non-resident prebendaries were to be
abolished and the endowments of their prebends
transferred to the Commissioners; in place of the
non-residentiaries the bishop was to be allowed to
appoint up to 24 honorary canons and dignitaries,
who would be non-resident and receive no emoluments. Minor canons (the term used in the Act to
describe vicars choral) appointed after the passage
of the Act were to receive not less than £150 a year
and, if priests, were to hold no benefice situated
more than six miles from the cathedral.
Under the terms of the Act the Crown retained the
right of appointing the dean, who was in future to
be in residence at least eight months a year. No
alteration was made to the method of electing
residentiaries, who were to reside at least three
months a year. Rights of patronage held by individual members of the chapter by virtue of their
tenure of certain dignities or prebends were to be
vested in the bishop; livings belonging to the
common fund were to be given only to members of
the chapter, to archdeacons of the diocese, to
honorary canons of the cathedral, or, if they were
willing to leave their previous posts within a year of
institution, to clergy who had been for at least five
years minor canons or lecturers in the cathedral,
incumbents or curates in the diocese, or public
tutors at Oxford or Cambridge. Should common
fund livings not be filled within six months the
right of presentation was to lapse to the bishop.
Regulations were also laid down concerning property
in the Close. For the disposal of surplus prebendal
houses or for the raising of mortgages on canonries in
order to improve the remaining residences the chapter
now had to obtain the permission not only of the
bishop but also of the Ecclesiastical Commissioners.
The cathedral was thus placed more firmly than
ever before under episcopal and parliamentary
control. It remained hard-pressed financially. In
1852 the chapter had an income of some £2,941,
over half of which came to it from the fabric fund.
By comparison Durham, the richest of the English
cathedrals, had an income that year of almost
£58,000. Lichfield's relative position was even worse
when considered over the seven-year period 18461852. Salisbury, which was the only English
cathedral in 1852 to have an income lower than that
of Lichfield, had an average annual income for the
seven years of over £5,300; Lichfield was the poorest
English cathedral, with an average annual income of
about £3,167. (fn. 358) Between 1857 and 1863 the chapter's
average annual income from its corporate property
was only some £1,550. Rents were evidently being
pushed up gradually, but as usual the chapter relied
chiefly upon entry fines to keep up the average
income. In the year 1860-1, for example, when the
chapter received no entry fines, its income was only
some £881, whereas in the following year fines of
£2,170 brought the total up to some £3,059. (fn. 359)
Under an Order in Council of 1852 provision
was made for securing fixed incomes for future
deans and residentiaries of Lichfield. (fn. 360) Deans
appointed after the making of the Order were to
have incomes of £1,000 and residentiaries of £500 a
year. Any surplus decanal or canonical income was
to be paid to the Ecclesiastical Commissioners, who
were in turn to make up any deficiencies. In 1876 the
dean and chapter transferred all their property,
except the cathedral and its precincts, the deanery,
the canonical houses, the chapter clerk's house,
their ecclesiastical and educational patronage, the
property held in trust for the choristers, and about
10 acres of land in Lichfield, to the Ecclesiastical
Commissioners. In return they were guaranteed
£5,250 a year until the death or resignation of
Canon Henry Ryder, the last of the pre-1852
residentiaries, and £5,500 a year thereafter. This
provided incomes of £1,000 a year for the dean and
£500 a year for the residentiaries (only £250 for
Canon Ryder, who still enjoyed his customary share
of the capitular income) and £2,500 a year for the
maintenance of the cathedral and other expenses.
The chapter clerk was allotted a further £120 a year,
the value of some property in the Close and Dam
Street, Lichfield. Since the chapter had refrained
from renewing certain leases on parts of the property
to be transferred it was compensated for loss of fines
by a grant of £3,000. A further lump sum of £15,000
was allotted to it to be spent under the supervision
of the Ecclesiastical Commissioners on repairs and
restoration at the cathedral. With this arrangement
of 1876 begins the modern pattern of the cathedral's
finances. Meanwhile various measures taken to
regulate the financial position of the deanery
according to the terms of the 1852 Order resulted
in the loss to the dean of the rectories of Brewood
and Adbaston in 1867, on the death of Dean Howard,
and that of Tatenhill in 1875, on the death of Dean
Champneys.
The loss of two residentiaries under the provisions
of the Cathedrals Act had reduced the residentiary
chapter to a dean and four residentiaries by the
mid 1850s. When the prebend of Sawley was
suspended on the death of Dr. Lawrence Gardner
in 1845 the treasurership also fell into abeyance,
thus leaving the cathedral with only three dignitaries. (fn. 361) Among the suggestions made by the chapter
to the Cathedral Commissioners in the mid 1850s
was one calling for the treasurership to be revived and
conferred upon one of the remaining residentiaries;
the chapter considered that to the post there could
be attached the cure of souls in the parish of the
Close and possibly the office of principal of the
proposed theological college at Lichfield (opened in
1857). (fn. 362) Bishop Selwyn (1867-78), who thought
that a cathedral chapter should ideally be a body of
men devoted to the training of ordinands and the
organization of diocesan work, (fn. 363) favoured a more
ambitious scheme. In 1869 he summoned a general
chapter of residentiaries and honorary canons to
consider reforms and reorganization at the cathedral
in the light of reports by the Cathedral Commissioners, (fn. 364) and in 1871 the general chapter proposed
that the two suspended residentiaryships should be
revived (fn. 365) — a move probably taken at the bishop's
instigation and undoubtedly meeting with his full
approval. The residentiary chapter, however, felt
that the proposal was injudicious and in 1872
informed Archbishop Tait on its own authority that
it did not think it desirable to alter the existing
number of residentiaries. (fn. 366) The residentiaries
thought that it would be difficult, if not impossible,
to endow two further residentiaryships; and though
Selwyn, who had hoped that one of the revived
canonries would be held by a coadjutor bishop and
the other by the principal of the Lichfield Theological College, fought hard for his proposals, in the
end nothing was done. (fn. 367) The treasurership was
finally revived in 1906 by Order in Council. It was,
however, to be held by the prebendary of Offley
and Flixton, and the treasurer's former prebend of
Sawley remained suspended. (fn. 368)
Although Selwyn failed to enlarge the residentiary
chapter, he effected other reforms. It was he, for
example, who reinstated the general chapter as a
regular supervisory body for the cathedral. Though
its recommendations regarding the residentiaryships
came to nothing, it achieved one major success
during his episcopate: the revision and translation
between 1869 and 1875 of the cathedral statutes. (fn. 369)
In 1863 Bishop Lonsdale had printed Statuta et
Consuetudines Ecclesiae Cathedralis Lichfieldiae. This
collection contained the statutes of Bishops Hacket,
Lloyd, Hough, Chandler, Smalbroke, and Frederick
Cornwallis, and Lonsdale's own statute of 1863
concerning the vicars choral, the first statute issued
to the cathedral in English. A number of the older
statutes, especially those concerning property, had
been rendered meaningless by the passage of time
and the operation of the Cathedrals Act and subsequent measures. Selwyn was determined to produce
an intelligible modern body of statutes. The work
was completed in December 1875, and the bishop
wrote to a friend: 'On December 21, when the whole
document had been printed, we met pro forma to
sign and seal; and so came to pass the euthanasia of
the old Composition [of 1428] and all of the unintelligible stuff which has been sworn to for "four or
five centuries."' (fn. 370) These English statutes have
formed the basis of all subsequent versions of the
cathedral statutes.
The passage of the Cathedrals Act and the widespread attacks upon clerical absenteeism forced the
residentiaries to take their obligations of residence
far more seriously. In 1840, shortly after the Act had
been passed, the dean and chapter, 'having witnessed
with much pain and concern the very imperfect state
of the residence directed by the statutes on the part
of the several canons of this cathedral and the
consequent failure of attendance on the services of
the church', adopted certain resolutions to bring the
practice at Lichfield into line with that at other
cathedrals. It was decided that, if any residentiary
was unable to perform his statutory residence, his
duties might be carried out by another residentiary,
or by one of the honorary canons if no residentiary
would help. The substitute was to be paid £100 a
year by the absentee and, if an honorary canon, was
to have such of the privileges of a residentiary 'as
may be deemed expedient'. All the residentiaries
save one agreed to abide by these rules, and it was
expected that two, who were in bad health, would
take advantage of them promptly. (fn. 371) In general this
arrangement appears to have worked satisfactorily;
in 1873, however, Bishop Selwyn used as one of his
arguments for enlarging the residentiary chapter
the fact that at that time it was reduced virtually to
three members by the unauthorized absence of
Canon Henry Ryder. (fn. 372) The 1875 statutes laid down
that the dean and residentiaries were each to keep at
least three months' residence a year. On at least 45
days of this period attendance at both matins and
evensong was required; during the remainder of the
three months attendance at one service a day
sufficed. Attendance by proxy — another residentiary or 'in case of need' an honorary canon — was
permitted. (fn. 373) The rule remained unaltered in 1905. (fn. 374)
A noticeable feature of the changes after 1840,
and one example of the increased vigour of cathedral
life, was the greater number of services and
celebrations of Holy Communion. (fn. 375) The cathedral
was also becoming once more a centre of diocesan
life, and this was reflected in the number of special
services held there. In the mid 1850s there were
two services daily, except on the six days a year
during which the building was closed for cleaning.
Services were at 10.30 a.m. and 4.30 p.m. on Sundays
and 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. on week-days, except for
Christmas Day, Good Friday, and some special
occasions. All services were choral except on 'days of
humiliation', when the organ was not played. There
was a service of Holy Communion every Sunday
and on Christmas Day and Ascension Day. Sermons
were preached at matins every Sunday and on
holy days and other special occasions; the duties of
the divinity lecturer had been commuted into that
of preaching on certain saints' days.
By 1880 the number of services had increased still
more. (fn. 376) Holy Communion was celebrated at 8 a.m.
every Sunday, and there was also a midday celebration on the first, third, and, when it occurred, the
fifth Sunday of every month. There were two
celebrations on all great festivals and one on all
saints' days and on various diocesan occasions.
Sunday services remained at the same times, with
the Litany as a separate service at 2.30 p.m. whenever there was a midday Communion. Weekday
services were at 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. between Lady
Day and Michaelmas and on holy days, and at
10.30 a.m. and 4 p.m. during the rest of the year.
All services were choral except the 2.30 p.m. Litany,
evensong whenever there was a special evening
service, and Holy Communion, which was choral
only at midday celebrations and on the great
festivals. Various extra services were held, notably
during Advent and Lent. There were two sermons
each Sunday, those at the morning service being
preached by the dean, one of the residentiaries, or
one of the honorary canons, and those in the afternoon by the dean or the canon in residence. On
saints' days sermons were preached by the divinity
lecturer or some other member of the cathedral
body; there were sermons preached by diocesan
clergy at special weekday services during Advent
and Lent, and 'addresses' delivered at other times
such as Good Friday and Holy Week.
By 1880 the cathedral was being used regularly
for diocesan gatherings of various kinds. (fn. 377) Among
the more notable of these were the Diocesan Choir
Gatherings; Lichfield was the first cathedral to hold
such a festival, and it was subsequently copied in
almost every other diocese in England. John
Hutchinson, the precentor, was responsible for the
first gathering, held on 14 October 1856, when 26
parish choirs joined the cathedral choir in morning
and evening services. The Bishops of Lichfield and
of Sodor and Man, the cathedral chapter, and about
150 diocesan clergy were present, and the congregation numbered in all nearly 3,000 people.
The increased number of cathedral services and
the growing diocesan use of the building made the
ability and efficiency of the vicars choral far more
important than it had been previously, and various
moves were made after 1840 to improve the musical
side of cathedral worship. (fn. 378) In 1842 the chapter
informed the vicars that in future at least three vicars
were to be present at each morning or evening
service, one representing each part of the choir; no
vicar would be allowed leave beyond that laid down
by statute unless he had previously found a substitute. Applications for leave were to be made,
whenever possible, to the hebdomadary chapter
instead of simply to the canon in residence, so that
daily services might be arranged 'with greater
precision'. Five years later, however, it was reported
that the order limiting the number of vicars who
might be absent from any one service had been
'habitually disregarded'.
The chief problem facing those who wished to
improve the quality of the choir was the vicars'
freehold. Once appointed a vicar held office until he
died or resigned, and a number of elderly vicars
whose voices had decayed clung to their posts and
forced the chapter to various shifts to maintain the
quality of the singing. In the early 1850s, for
example, it was employing two supernumerary lay
vicars because two octogenarian vicars were no
longer able to sing with the choir. (fn. 379) Precentor
Hutchinson submitted to the Cathedral Commissioners in 1853 that more vicars were required; it
was impossible to ask men to sing twice a day
throughout the year, and leave and infirmity left
gaps in the choir. Unpaid assistance would be
unreliable; but he felt that a salary less than half
that received by the existing vicars would secure
the three supernumeraries necessary to bring the
choir to full efficiency. The organist was less
sanguine: 'Nothing but salary can accomplish what
you wish . . . If you were to double the number of
lay vicars you would not improve the choir but
would have more noise and less music. Good
musicians and good voices are scarce things and are
not to be found in this city'. (fn. 380) Finally, in 1861, six
supernumerary lay vicars were appointed, all
resident in Lichfield, and it was agreed that up to
£12 a year should be distributed among such of
them as required some payment. (fn. 381)
In 1863 Bishop Lonsdale promulgated new
statutes for the vicars. The number of vicars was, it
was stated, no longer sufficient for the due performance of services if vicars were to be allowed 'reason
able relaxation and occasional necessary absence';
and since the value of their property had increased,
thus making more funds available, their numbers
were duly raised from 12 (5 priest vicars and 7 lay
vicars) to 14 (4 priest vicars and 10 lay vicars). Any
vicar incapable of performing his duties was to
provide a duly qualified substitute; the existing
vicars were allowed the option of paying instead an
annual sum to the chapter. (fn. 382) These reforms were
evidently insufficient, for in the early 1880s Bishop
Maclagan, the dean, and the chapter were united in
agreeing that the corporation of vicars should be
dissolved and replaced by a body of stipendiary
vicars who could be dismissed or pensioned off
when their voices were no longer adequate. (fn. 383) The
Cathedral Commissioners recommended this in
their report on the cathedral in 1884, (fn. 384) but nothing
was done.
The financial arrangements of the corporation
followed the same general pattern as those of the
chapter. The vicars, who in 1840 were managing
their own estates, had by the end of the century
transferred their property to the Ecclesiastical
Commissioners in return for a fixed annual payment.
In the seven years 1846-52 the average gross annual
income of the corporation was about £1,500; the
income varied between £2,010 in 1849 and £882 in
1851. On an average rack-rents amounted to about
£110 a year, while reserved rents on leases came to
about £234 a year; commons from the chapter
provided a regular £54 12s. a year, and the rest was
made up of entry fines. This provided the subchanter
with an income which varied between £179 4s. in
1849 and £84 17s. 8d. in 1851; some of the vicars,
both priest and lay, received over £165 each in
1849, while in 1851 one of the priest vicars was paid
as little as £67 12s. 3d. and one of the lay vicars
£63 6s. 7d. (fn. 385) The 1863 cathedral statutes laid down
that none of the existing vicars was to suffer
financially because of the increase in numbers. (fn. 386) In
1872 the vicars transferred all their property, with
the exception of the twelve vicarial houses in the
Close, to the Ecclesiastical Commissioners in return
for an annual payment of £2,160. (fn. 387) From this in
1880 the six 'older' vicars, those appointed before
the 1863 statutes, received sums varying from
£171 1s. 8d. to £176 15s. 4d.; the eight 'younger'
vicars, those appointed since 1863, received £128
14s. 4d. each, except for the dean's vicar, who was
paid £2 6s. more. Upon the death of every 'older'
vicar the salaries of the remaining vicars were
augmented. It was estimated that when all the
'older' vicars had died or retired the fourteen vicars
would each receive £152 4s. a year and their
commons. In addition twelve of the vicars had
vicarial houses in the Close. (fn. 388) The financial position
of Lichfield vicars in the last quarter of the 19th
century compared very favourably with that of
vicars at other English cathedrals, and in 1906 the
dean informed them that their stipend of about
£150 'with one or possibly two exceptions . . . is the
largest in England'. He added that whenever there
was a vacancy at Lichfield there were many applicants
from other cathedrals, not only because of the
stipend offered 'but also because of the advantageous
terms enjoyed in retirement'. (fn. 389)
The number of choristers remained at eight until
December 1861, when it was increased to ten. (fn. 390) In
addition there were generally four or six supernumerary boys on probation. The boys continued
to be maintained on the proceeds of property
managed on their behalf by the residentiary chapter;
by 1879 the property — houses and land — produced about £360 a year. In the mid 1850s the boys
received stipends ranging from £7 to £20 a year.
When the numbers were increased in 1861 the scale
of stipends was revised. (fn. 391) Choristers and probationers received free education from the schoolmaster provided for them by the chapter; the school
was in the Close, and in 1866 a newly-appointed
schoolmaster was given permission to take up to 14
probationers in addition to the choristers. (fn. 392) When
choristers left they were generally given a bonus
payment to be used as an apprenticeship fee, the
amount varying according to their past behaviour
and general usefulness in the choir. (fn. 393)
The major work undertaken by the chapter during
these years was perhaps the full-scale restoration of
the cathedral. To some extent this was rendered
necessary by decay and the deterioration of poorquality stone used in previous rebuilding; but it is
evident from contemporary evidence that what
weighed more heavily with the chapter was the
changing taste in ecclesiastical architecture and the
consequent dissatisfaction with the state of the
cathedral as Wyatt (fn. 394) and Potter had left it. Moreover
the greater use being made of the cathedral and the
need to accommodate larger congregations rendered
the 18th-century arrangements, which isolated the
choir and the Lady Chapel from the rest of the
building, totally inadequate.
Ecclesiology reached Lichfield early. The pioneering Cambridge Camden Society was founded in
1839, (fn. 395) and in 1841 there appeared the Lichfield
Society for the Encouragment of Ecclesiastical
Architecture, a body with similar, though rather less
ambitious, aims and ideals. It had close connexions
with the cathedral: the dean and chapter were among
its vice-presidents, and its first chairman was
William Gresley, Prebendary of Wolvey. At the first
annual general meeting, held in January 1843,
Gresley offered the society's help in 'the restoration
of the west front or even the whole of Lichfield
Cathedral; if only the dean and chapter will accept
our services and the diocese will place twenty or
thirty thousand pounds at our disposal'. (fn. 396) Although
such a task was, and remained, outside the society's
powers it is highly probable that its activities
focussed attention on the cathedral and strengthened
the position of those who wished to see a thoroughgoing restoration of the building.
In fact work on the cathedral began shortly after
the society's foundation. In September 1842 a
report on the state of the fabric was submitted to
the chapter by Sydney Smirke, a younger brother
and pupil of the more famous Sir Robert Smirke,
and he was authorized to spend £1,000 during the
ensuing year on such repairs and restorations 'as
appear to him of the most urgent importance'. (fn. 397)
Between 1842 and 1846 Smirke restored the south
aisle of the nave at a cost of some £3,000. Largescale work was then brought to an end for lack of
funds, though the chapter retained two workmen to
carry out urgently needed repairs and Smirke
remained consultant architect to the cathedral. (fn. 398)
Work was resumed on a rather larger scale in the
late 1850s, thanks mainly to the enthusiasm and
powers of persuasion of Precentor Hutchinson. After
Hutchinson had visited Ely Cathedral, and one or
two other churches which had recently been restored, Dean Howard, a cautious man, was finally
persuaded that similar restoration was needed at
Lichfield. (fn. 399) The work immediately involved was
chiefly the opening out and rearrangement of the
choir, for which Smirke and George Gilbert (later
Sir Gilbert) Scott submitted plans in April 1855. (fn. 400)
Early in 1857 the chapter considered Smirke's
drawings for the proposed restoration of the choir;
it then asked Scott and Benjamin Ferrey, diocesan
architect for Bath and Wells, who had been
associated with the two others in some of their
earlier proposals, to prepare schemes for its consideration. (fn. 401) Ferrey having declined to compete,
Scott's and Smirke's proposals were considered later
in the year, and the verdict went to Scott. (fn. 402)
One of the canons later painted a gloomy picture
of the cathedral as it was before Scott started his
work. (fn. 403) The whole of the interior was 'one uniform,
dead, yellowish whitewash, many coats thick'. The
nave was 'quite unused — indeed, except during
service hours the verger's silver key alone gave
admission to any part of the church. During morning
and evening prayers the nursery maids, it was said,
used to walk up and down with babies in their
arms; nay, it is reported that the smell of a cigar has
been detected in the nave while service was being
sung in the choir'. As a result of Wyatt's work nave
and choir were completely separated by a high stone
screen, filling the whole of the first bay of the choir.
On this screen was placed the organ, surmounted by
a glass screen going up to the roof. Since the arches
between the choir and the choir aisles had been
filled in with plaster, there had thus been created
what was virtually a self-contained church within
a church. (fn. 404) In the choir itself, with its altar at the
east end of the Lady Chapel, there were oak pews,
lined with green baize and studded with brass nails,
and, in the three bays eastward from the screen,
stalls 'composed of plaster, wood, rope, nails, and
much else, with canopies of the same material over
them, which the old verger of that day used to call
"beautiful tabernacle work." '
The work of demolishing the plaster between the
choir and the choir aisles, which had been begun in
1856, evidently under Smirke's direction, (fn. 405) was
continued by Scott, together with that of pulling
down the stalls and canopies in the choir. In 1858
the organ was moved into the nave, which was
temporarily equipped for services, and the screen
upon which it had stood was demolished. The
arches between the transept aisles and the choir
aisles were opened out, and in both choir and
transepts whitewash was scraped off and plaster
replaced by stone. Mouldings, figures, and capitals
were renewed. It had originally been intended to
confine the restoration to the choir; the chapter
subsequently decided, however, that a whitewashed
nave would look strange against a restored choir and
Scott was instructed to complete the restoration of
the whole of the interior. When the work in the
choir was sufficiently advanced the organ was
moved back and Scott turned his attention to the
nave. Comparatively little needed to be done there
beyond the removal of the whitewash and the
restoration of some stonework; Scott was urged
to replace Wyatt's plaster groining with stone
but refused, saying that the walls would not bear
it. (fn. 406)
Among the furnishings installed during the course
of the restoration was a new organ presented by
Josiah Spode of Hawkesyard Park, Armitage; it was
placed in the north transept aisle. (fn. 407) A metal screen
designed by Scott was erected between the nave and
the choir. It was the first of its type; later examples
included those at the cathedrals of Worcester and
Hereford. (fn. 408) Similarly the pavement tiles within the
altar rails containing Old Testament subjects worked
in pottery ware by Minton and Co. of Stoke-uponTrent and presented by the firm to the cathedral
were the first of their kind in modern times and were
later copied in other churches. (fn. 409) The cathedral was
officially reopened on 22 October 1861, though
services had been held in the building virtually
throughout the restoration. (fn. 410)
The reopening did not, however, mark the end of
work on the cathedral. Restoration went on almost
continuously for another forty years, first under
G. G. Scott and then under his son J. O. Scott. The
interior of the cathedral occupied the chapter's
attention during the years immediately following
1861. The plaster arcading on either side of the nave
was replaced by stone, similar work was carried out
in the choir aisles, the chapter-house and library
were repaired, Wyatt's plaster reredos was removed
from the Lady Chapel, some new glass was inserted
to match the Herckenrode windows, and the
consistory court was cleaned and restored. With this
last task, completed in 1880, the restoration of the
interior was virtually finished and the chapter could
concentrate on external repairs. (fn. 411)
Work had already begun in 1877 on the west front
to remove Potter's much-criticized Roman cement
and replace it by stone. It was also decided to
replace with new statues the numerous figures
which had formerly adorned the west front and of
which only two survived. The distribution of the
statues followed in general the former pattern,
though a statue of Christ replaced one of Charles II
in the central niche of the apex. The cost of these
statues, some £5,000, was borne by individual
donors and the Ecclesiastical Commissioners agreed
that the £15,000 which they had laid aside in 1876
for use on the fabric, together with the interest
which had accumulated on it, should be devoted to
the restoration of the west front; the chapter itself
raised a further £15,000 by subscription. The work,
which included not only the west front but also the
refacing of both the west towers and considerable
repairs to them and their spires, was completed in
1884. (fn. 412) Other major work completed later included
the repair and restoration of the exterior of the Lady
Chapel, repairs to the central tower and spire,
the rebuilding of the north and south ends of
the transepts, and the restoration of St. Chad's
Chapel. (fn. 413) In March 1901 a Thanksgiving Festival
for the complete restoration of the cathedral was
celebrated. (fn. 414)
After the 18th-century demolitions and rebuilding
in the Close there were comparatively few major
alterations to the domestic buildings in the 19th
century. When in the late 1870s Bishop Selwyn
decided to live in Lichfield, after many years during
which the bishops had used Eccleshall castle
as their sole residence, two wings were added
to the 17th-century palace in the Close. (fn. 415) Otherwise the only important work appears to have
been the provision, south of the cathedral, of quarters
for the theological college, which was opened in
1857. (fn. 416)
The Twentieth Century
During the present century the life and work of
the cathedral and the chapter have been further
modified to harmonize with changing conditions.
The most notable alteration to the constitution of
the cathedral body came in 1934 with the dissolution
of the ancient corporation of the subchanter and
vicars choral under the terms of an Order in Council
of that year. (fn. 417) Even this, however, was not a startling
event; at intervals for many years the corporation
had been attacked by bishops and chapter as an
anachronism in a modern cathedral, (fn. 418) and it is not
surprising that when, under the provisions of the
Cathedrals Measure of 1931, the minor corporations
of other English cathedrals were dissolved (fn. 419) the
Lichfield corporation shared their fate. The rights
of existing vicars were safeguarded, and the
property of the corporation, consisting chiefly of
two annuities from the Ecclesiastical Commissioners
amounting to £2,260 a year, was transferred to the
dean and chapter. (fn. 420) The 1937 cathedral statutes laid
down a new scheme under which there were to be
nine lay vicars and not more than four priest vicars.
All were to be appointed by the residentiary chapter,
except for one of the priest vicars who was to be
appointed by the dean. Vicars were to have a written
contract of employment including the provision of
three months' notice on either side. Lay vicars were
to attend all sung services at the cathedral; each was
to have one free day a week, still known in the
traditional fashion as his sine day, and in addition
an annual holiday of 21 days. (fn. 421) In 1964 there were
nine lay vicars but only two priest vicars. (fn. 422)
Under the 1905 cathedral statutes and the Order
in Council of the following year reviving the
treasurership the residentiary chapter consisted of
the dean and four canons, including the precentor,
chancellor, and treasurer; they allotted annually
amongst themselves the offices of commoner (with
responsibility for auditing chapter accounts), fabric
keeper or custos (with responsibility for the cathedral
building), and director of ceremonies (with responsibility for the arrangements on ceremonial
occasions). (fn. 423) The 1937 statutes, while leaving the
number of residentiaries at five, made the post of
custos one of the cathedral dignities, thus giving each
residentiary a dignity. (fn. 424) The terms of residence were
at the same time slightly altered. In lieu of the three
months' residence a year required by the 1905
statutes, a distinction was now made between
'residence', during which attendance at both
morning and evening services was not obligatory,
and 'close residence', corresponding to the periods
of residence required by previous cathedral statutes,
when the residentiary was to be present daily at
matins and evensong. It was laid down that in future
the dean was to be in close residence for 45 days a
year and a canon residentiary for three consecutive
months a year; residence of at least 240 days a year
was enjoined on dean and canons. (fn. 425)
The present century has seen at Lichfield, as in
all English cathedrals, a great reduction in the
number of sung services. (fn. 426) Whereas about 1900
morning and evening prayer were sung daily except
on Wednesdays, in 1964 the only sung services were
those on Sundays, matins every Friday, and evensong four week-day evenings a week. The reasons for
this change are chiefly economic. Whereas previously a lay vicar's chief source of income was his
stipend from the cathedral, which he could eke out
with money from part-time jobs such as musicteaching, today it is usually necessary to find a lay
vicar a full-time job, and the money which he
receives from the cathedral simply supplements his
main income. The cathedral has been fortunate in
finding a number of local employers who are
prepared to allow men time off for services and
rehearsals, but it is obviously impossible to have
sung services as frequently as before. This new
pattern of employment was one of the factors which
in 1951 persuaded the chapter to change the time of
evensong to the present 5.30 p.m., thus making it
easier for lay vicars to come to the cathedral when
they finished work in the afternoon. Meanwhile the
number of special services and diocesan gatherings
held at the cathedral continues to increase. There
has, for example, been an annual service for Young
Farmers in the diocese since 1962, while services for
the combined diocesan Sunday Schools, for the
Darby and Joan clubs in the diocese, and on such
occasions as Commonwealth Youth Sunday fill the
cathedral with congregations of about 2,000 people
at a time.
Shortly after the beginning of the century there
was a brief dispute over vestments and ritual. A
chapter order that copes should be worn at celebrations of Holy Communion in the cathedral on
and after Christmas Day 1901 (fn. 427) gave rise to some
dissension among the residentiaries. The chancellor,
J. G. Lonsdale, objected and was granted an
exemption because of his advanced age (he had been
a canon of the cathedral for over forty-five years).
Another residentiary, Canon C. Mortimer, refused
to obey the order. At a meeting of the residentiary
chapter in May 1902 Dean Luckock announced that
he was advised that the order for the wearing of
copes was lawful, as were the newly-introduced
practices of taking the Ablutions at the altar and of
singing a hymn during the cleansing of the chalice,
about which another canon had complained. Two
months later, at another chapter meeting, Lonsdale
announced that both he and Mortimer would wear
copes, though 'it seemed to them hard that after
being so long in Orders they should be called upon
to adopt a dress that had been so rarely used in
cathedrals' and they did not acknowledge the
soundness of the legal opinion given to the dean.
Luckock, anxious to avoid further friction within
the chapter, proposed that instead the exemption
already granted to Lonsdale should be extended to
Mortimer; this was unanimously agreed (fn. 428) and
appears to have closed the matter. In 1918, 'in view
of the extremely unsatisfactory nature of the only
bread now available for altar use', the chapter
decided to adopt the use of wafer bread in the
cathedral, and the Sisters of the Community of St.
Peter, Horbury (Yorks. W.R.), were asked to supply
the wafers. (fn. 429)
The maintenance and repair of the cathedral
fabric continues to be one of the chapter's chief
preoccupations. One major improvement of the
past half-century has been the installation, in 1930,
of electric lighting in the cathedral (fn. 430) to replace the
gas lights which had been in use since at least
1861. (fn. 431) Some restoration work was undertaken in
the 1920s, (fn. 432) and since the Second World War a
more extensive and ambitious scheme has been
embarked upon. (fn. 433) In the early 1950s the central
spire was strengthened. Shortly afterwards it was
discovered that the roof of the cathedral had been
badly damaged by the death-watch beetle, and in
1956 the chapter launched an appeal for funds to
enable it to repair the roof and complete other
necessary repairs and improvements. Since then it
has been able to proceed steadily with the work. The
roofs of the nave, choir, presbytery, Lady Chapel,
and north and south transepts have been restored; the
two spires at the west end have been strengthened;
some exterior stonework has been restored; glass
has been releaded; the cathedral has been rewired throughout; and in 1964 the west side of
the south transept, omitted from the 19th-century
restoration, was being restored. The chapter itself
has had to raise all the money for this work, and it
has been greatly helped in this task by the efforts of
the Friends of Lichfield Cathedral, an organization
founded in 1937 to support and assist the cathedral.
In recent years the Friends have not only contributed to the appeal fund in general but have also
made grants towards the cost of such things as the
rebinding of the St. Chad's Gospels, the provision of
new copes, the purchase of new altar books, and the
cleaning of monuments in the cathedral. At present
there are about 1,300 members of the organization.
The most important recent development in the
Close has resulted from the expansion and transformation of the choir school. (fn. 434) By the 1930s the
number of choristers had risen to 18, and there were
36 boys (two sets of 18) receiving free education at
the chapter's expense. The financial burden on the
chapter was causing it concern in the late 1930s, and
the position worsened after the outbreak of the
Second World War. In 1941 it was decided to
reorganize the school. In the following year it was
reopened as a preparatory school in the house in the
Close previously assigned to the chancellor. It was
renamed St. Chad's Cathedral School, and feepaying non-choristers were admitted. Since 1955
the school has also occupied the former Bishop's
Palace in the Close, last used by Bishop Woods and
handed over to the dean and chapter in 1954; the
present bishop lives in a smaller house in the Close.
There are at present some 80 boys at the school, most
of them Midlanders. Of the boys 18 are choral
scholars whose fees are paid by the chapter.
Another feature of the modern Close is the Dean
Savage Library, founded and endowed in 1924 (fn. 435) by
the dean whose name it bears, a notable historian of
the cathedral. It occupies part of one of the houses
in the Close and contains his library of history and
theology and some of his notes and transcripts.
Deans of Lichfield
William, occurs about 1140. (fn. 436)
Master Hamon, occurs about 1170. (fn. 437)
William de Lega, occurs by 1173. (fn. 438)
Richard of Dalham, succeeded William de Lega
1176, occurs about 1210-11. (fn. 439)
Ralph Nevill, appointed 1214, Bishop of Chichester 1222. (fn. 440)
Master William of Mancetter, elected 1222, died
1254. (fn. 441)
Ralph of Sempringham, D.Th., elected 1254,
died 1280. (fn. 442)
Master John of Derby, elected 1280, died 1319. (fn. 443)
Stephen Segrave, D.Cn.L., elected 1319, Archbishop of Armagh 1324.
Roger de Convenis, provided 1324, exchanged the
deanery with John Garssia for a canonry in
Lerida, Spain, 1328.
John Garssia, provided 1328, Bishop of Marseilles
1335.
Richard FitzRalph, D.Th., provided 1335, Archbishop of Armagh 1346.
John Thoresby, B.C.L., provided 1346, Bishop of
St. David's 1347.
Master Simon Brisley, provided 1347, Dean of
Lincoln 1349.
John Buckingham, admitted 1350, Bishop of
Lincoln 1363.
William Manton.
Laurence Ibstock, Lic.C.L.
Anthony Rous.
Papal licence was granted for the king to
nominate to the deanery in 1363. Manton occurs
in 1364. Ibstock was elected in February 1369,
but Manton was presented by the king to the
deanery in September. Rous died as dean in
1370.
Francis de Teobaldeschi, Cardinal priest of St.
Sabina, admitted 1371 after provision, died 1378.
William Pakington, installed 1381 after provision,
resigned by April 1390.
Thomas Stretton, B.C.L., elected 1390, died
1426.
Robert Wolveden, elected 1426, died by September 1432.
John Verney, elected 1432, died 1457.
Thomas Heywood, B.C.L., D.Cn.L., elected
1457, died 1492.
John Yotton, D.Th., elected 1493, died by August
1512.
Ralph Colyngwood, D.Th., elected 1512, died
1521.
James Denton, D.C.L., installed 1522, died 1533.
Richard Sampson, D.Cn.L., D.C.L., elected
1533, Bishop of Chichester 1536.
Henry Williams, B.Th., elected 1536, deprived
for marriage 1553. (fn. 444)
John Ramridge, D.D., installed 1554, deprived
shortly after the accession of Elizabeth I. (fn. 445)
Lawrence Nowell, M.A., installed 1560, died
1576. (fn. 446)
George Boleyn, D.D., installed 1576, died 1603.
James Montague, D.D., installed 1603, Dean of
Worcester 1604. (fn. 447)
William Tooker, D.D., installed 1605, died 1621.
Walter Curle, D.D., installed 1621, Bishop of
Rochester 1627.
Augustine Lindsell, D.D., installed 1628, Bishop
of Peterborough 1632.
John Warner, D.D., appointed 1633, Bishop of
Rochester 1637.
Samuel Fell, D.D., appointed 1637, Dean of
Christ Church, Oxford, 1638.
Griffith Higgs, D.D., appointed 1638, died 1659.
William Paul, D.D., installed 1661, Bishop of
Oxford 1663.
Thomas Wood, D.D., appointed 1664, Bishop of
Lichfield and Coventry 1671.
Matthew Smalwood, D.D., appointed 1671, died
1683.
Lancelot Addison, D.D., appointed 1683, died
1703.
William Binckes, D.D., appointed 1703, died
1712.
Jonathan Kimberley, D.D., appointed 1713, died
1720.
William Walmisley, M.A., appointed 1720, died
1730.
Nicholas Penny, D.D., appointed 1730, died 1745.
John Addenbrooke, D.D., appointed 1745, died
1776.
Baptist Proby, D.D., appointed 1776, died 1807.
John Chappel Woodhouse, D.D., appointed 1807,
died 1833.
Hon. Henry Edward John Howard, D.D.,
appointed 1833, died 1868. (fn. 448)
William Weldon Champneys, M.A., appointed
1868, died 1875. (fn. 449)
Edward Bickersteth, D.D., appointed 1875,
resigned 1892. (fn. 450)
Herbert Mortimer Luckock, D.D., appointed
1892, died 1909. (fn. 451)
Henry Edwin Savage, D.D., appointed 1909, died
1939. (fn. 452)
Frederic Athelwold Iremonger, D.D., appointed
1939, died 1952. (fn. 453)
William Stuart Macpherson, M.A., appointed
1954. (fn. 454)
The earliest reference to capitular seals occurs in
Bishop Nonant's statutes of 1191, according to
which the chancellor was the keeper of the chapter's
seals ad causas et negocia. (fn. 455) With one probable
exception no impression of a pre-Restoration
common seal is known, though there are several
examples of the more frequently used seals ad
causas. By at least the late 15th century the seal ad
causas was being used for sealing leases and other
grants, and Bishop Blythe, in his statutes of 1526,
made rules concerning its safe custody and proper
use. (fn. 456)
A chapter seal, probably the common seal, in use
between at least 1267 and 1309, is a pointed oval
about 25/8 by about 1¾ in. (fn. 457) It depicts a crowned
female figure (presumably the Virgin) wearing a
gown with long pendant sleeves. The hands are
held together, probably in prayer. The figure stands
in front of what appears to be a building; this has a
central tower with a high-pitched roof rising from a
flat-roofed façade. On either side of the standing
figure there is in the façade a window or fragment of
arcading rising to twin semi-circular arches. Legend,
lombardic:
SIGILLU[M] . . . LDENSIS . . .
The chapter seal in use since the Restoration is a
pointed oval 2½ by 1¾ in. (fn. 458) The design, with one
small modification, is a replica of that of the seal
ad causas in use before the Civil War (see below).
It depicts the Virgin, crowned and holding a
sceptre in her right hand, seated under a Gothic
canopy of three arches. In the base, between two
pillars, is St. Chad in pontificals, full-face and
holding a pastoral staff with both hands. Legend,
roman:
SIGILLUM COMMUNE DECANI ET CAPITULI
ECCLESIAE CATHEDRALIS LICHFEILDIAE
A new matrix, an exact replica of that just described,
was cut in 1959 and first used in 1960. It is now in
the possession of the chapter clerk. (fn. 459)
A seal ad negocia in use between at least 1224 and
1276 had the legend:
OMNIBUS HOC SIGNO LEVIORA NEGOCIA SIGNO
No impression is known. (fn. 460)
A seal ad causas in use between at least 1333 and
1550 is a pointed oval 2¾ by 15/8 in. depicting the
Virgin and Child under a pointed trefoiled arch. (fn. 461)
In the field are a crescent and an estoile. In the base,
under a two-spired church and a rounded trefoiled
arch, is St. Chad in pontificals seated on a throne,
lifting his right hand in benediction and holding a
pastoral staff in his left. Legend, lombardic:
SIGILLUM DECANI ET CAPITULI ECCLESIE
SANCTE MARIE ET SANCTI CEDDE LYCHEFELDIE
AD CAUSAS
A small seal ad causas in use between at least 1378
and 1409 is a pointed oval about 1½ by about 1 in. (fn. 462)
It depicts a figure, apparently mitred, seated under a
pointed trefoiled arch and holding a book in his lap.
In the base is a kneeling figure, possibly a bishop
with a pastoral staff. Legend, lombardic:
SIGILLUM C . . .
Another small seal ad causas, in use between at
least 1462 and 1501, is a pointed oval 1½ by 1 in.,
depicting Our Lord crowned, seated under a Gothic
canopy of three arches, lifting His right hand in
benediction and holding an orb surmounted by a
cross in His left. (fn. 463) In the base, under a pointed arch,
is a bishop (presumably St. Chad) with hands joined
in prayer and with a pastoral staff under his right
arm. Legend, black letter:
SIGILLUM DECANI ET CAPITULI ECCLESIE
CATHEDRALIS LICHFELDIE AD CAUSAS
In his statutes of 1526 Blythe followed his
injunctions concerning the seal ad causas with an
order that a seal should be provided for the communar. This was to be used to seal letters of
acquittance, letters missive, summonses, suspensions, and excommunications. The following year
the chapter was shown a newly made seal ad causas
and the communar's seal. (fn. 464) No impression of the
communar's seal is known to exist, but a seal ad
causas in use in 1545 and 1550, and almost certainly
used until the Civil War, was probably the new seal
ad causas of 1527. (fn. 465) It is a pointed oval about 21/8 by
1¼ in., depicting the Virgin, crowned and holding a
sceptre in her right hand, seated under a Gothic
canopy of three arches. In the base, between two
pillars, is St. Chad in pontificals, facing right and
holding a pastoral staff with both hands. Legend,
lombardic:
[SI]GILLUM DECANI ET CAPITULI ECCLESIE
CATHEDRALIS LICHFELDIE AD CAUS[AS]
A 17th-century decanal seal, a pointed oval 2½ by
17/8 in., depicts the Virgin, crowned, standing with
the Child on her left arm; to their left, in profile,
stands St. Chad, in pontificals and holding a pastoral
staff. (fn. 466) The group is framed by a pinnacled roundheaded arch. In the base is the shield of arms of the
see. Legend, roman:
SIGILLUM DECANI ECCLESIE CATHEDRALIS
LICHFEILDIE
The vicars choral had a common seal by at least
1315. (fn. 467) The earliest known impression of their seal
dates from 1368. The seal in use at that date
(probably that mentioned in 1315) was still in use
in 1508 and apparently continued to be used until
the Civil War. (fn. 468) It is a pointed oval 15/8 by 1 in.,
depicting St. Chad in pontificals, half-length, with
his right hand raised in benediction and a pastoral
staff in his left. Over his head is a rounded trefoiled
arch with a pinnacle on either side. In the base are
seven heads in profile, evidently representing vicars.
Legend, lombardic:
SIGILLUM COMMUNE VICARIORUM LICHESFELDIE
The matrix appears to have been lost during the
Civil War or the Interregnum, and after the
Restoration a new matrix was cut. This remained
the vicars' corporate seal until the dissolution of
the corporation in 1934. (fn. 469) It is a pointed oval 17/8 by
11/8 in. and follows the design of the earlier seal,
though St. Chad is now under a pointed arch, holds
his pastoral staff in his right hand, and rests his left
in his lap; in the base the seven heads of the earlier
seal have been replaced by seven roundels. Legend,
roman:
SIGILLUM COMMUNE VICARIORUM ECCLESIE
LICHFELDIE
A 17th-century seal of the officiality of the
spiritual jurisdiction of the dean and chapter is a
pointed oval 1½ by 11/8 in.; it depicts a hand issuing
from the clouds and holding a balance. (fn. 470) In the field
is the inscription 'Iustitia Reipublicae Basis'.
Legend, roman:
SIGILLUM OFFICIALITATIS DECANI ET CAPITULI
LICHFELDIE PRO SPIRITUALI IURISDICTIONE
TANTUM