House of Knights Hospitallers
The preceptory of Clanfield

Sponsor

Victoria County History

Publication

Author

William Page (editor)

Year published

1907

Pages

105-106

Annotate

Comment on this article
Double click anywhere on the text to add an annotation in-line

Citation Show another format:

'House of Knights Hospitallers: The preceptory of Clanfield', A History of the County of Oxford: Volume 2 (1907), pp. 105-106. URL: http://british-history.ac.uk/report.aspx?compid=40194 Date accessed: 30 August 2014.


Highlight

(Min 3 characters)

HOUSE OF KNIGHTS HOSPITALLERS

22. THE PRECEPTORY OF CLANFIELD

The Hospitallers had a preceptory at Clanfield with an income of £60, according to the valuation of 1338, (fn. 1) but of this sum about £15 seems to come from lands which originally belonged to the Templars. As there is no chartulary for the possessions of the Hospitallers in this county, we can do little more than give the record of 1279 in the Hundred Rolls. They owned at that time 2 hides in Clanfield, 1 in Brize Norton, 1½ in Westwell, a meadow in Grafton, a tenement in Woodstock, and another in Oxford. (fn. 2) But their chief property was the manor of Gosford in Kidlington, containing 2 carucates, (fn. 3) now 250 acres, (fn. 4) where they had their own manorial courts, and a chapel for their own tenants, erected shortly before 1235. (fn. 5) This property was given by Robert d'Oilly, (fn. 6) and therefore before 1142. In 1547 it is described as 'the House of the sisters of the order of St. John at Gosford,' as though sisters of that order had not only owned it but resided there. (fn. 7) They held also the advowson of Westwell as early as 1230. (fn. 8) A small property in Kencott was attached to the neighbouring preceptory of Quenington, Gloucestershire. (fn. 9)

Footnotes

1 The Hospitallers in Engl. (Camd. Soc.), 26; Hund. R. (Rec. Com.), ii, 793.
2 Hund. R. (Rec. Com.), ii, 691-2, 697, 700, 793, 842.
3 The Hospitallers in Engl. 26.
4 Three Oxfordshire Parishes (Oxf. Hist. Soc.), 129.
5 Oseney Chartul. No. 108.
6 Dugdale, Mon. ii, 545.
7 Lee, Hist. of Thame, 420; but it had been ordained that sisters of this order should live at Buckland only; see Chart. R. John (Rec. Com.), 16a.
8 Linc. Epis. Reg. Inst. Wells, ii, 32.
9 Hund. R. (Rec. Com.), ii, 699.