The United Service Club: the Athenaeum
These two club-houses are discussed together because
the history of their design and erection is closely inter-related
The club-houses of the United Service Club
and the Athenaeum stand upon part of the site
formerly occupied by Carlton House (fn. a) and its
surrounding yards and gardens; (ref. 12) part of the
United Service Club also occupies the site of the
first home of the Royal Academy of Arts (see
page 346). At the time of his accession to the
throne in 1820 George IV had taken a dislike to
Carlton House, despite the great improvement in
its northern outlook brought about by the formation of Regent Street. By an Act which received
the royal assent on 31 May 1826 the Commissioners of Woods, Forests and Land Revenues
were authorized to demolish it and to grant building leases of the site and surrounding gardens. (ref. 13)
As early as the summer of 1825 the Commissioners
had received requests for leases of the site. (ref. 14) The
Athenaeum applied in December 1825, followed
by the United Service Club in February 1826,
and the position of both the proposed club-houses
appears to have been settled by June 1826. Nash's
plan for the layout of the rest of the area, which is
in the parish of St. Martin in the Fields, was not
approved by the Treasury until January 1827,
and was subsequently modified. (ref. 15)
The first club-house built by the United Service Club stood at the north-east corner of
Charles Street (now Charles II Street) and Regent
Street on the site now occupied by the United
Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority; it was designed by (Sir) Robert Smirke and erected in
1817–19 (see page 289). By 1825 this first house
had proved too small for the needs of the members,
and the demolition of Carlton House presented
the club with an opportunity to acquire a new site
for the erection of a larger building.
At an extraordinary general meeting of the
club held on 28 February 1826 the committee of
management was authorized to procure a lease of
part of the site of Carlton House, to sell the house
in Charles Street, and to raise up to £13,000 to pay
for the erection of a new house. The building
committee which was to be appointed was instructed to submit its plans and contracts to the
committee of management, and 'are not again to
be interfered with'. (ref. 16)
The members of the building committee were
Thomas Philip Weddell, Lord Grantham (1781–1859), later second Earl de Grey, who was chairman of the club in 1824,1828 and 1856–7, (ref. 17) First
Lord of the Admiralty 1834–5, Lord Lieutenant
of Ireland 1841–4 and first President of the
Institute of British Architects 1834–59; Admiral
Sir Pulteney Malcolm (1768–1838), commander-in-chief in the Mediterranean 1828–31; Lieutenant-Colonel (later General) Sir Edward Kerrison (1774–1853), a Tory member of Parliament
1812–52; Vice-Admiral Sir William Johnstone
Hope (1766–1831), member of Parliament
1800–30 and a member of the Board of Admiralty 1820–8; Colonel (later Major-General
Sir) Alexander Caldwell (1763–1839), an artillery
officer; Rear-Admiral (later Admiral of the Fleet)
Sir Charles Ogle (1775–1858), commander-in-chief in North America 1827–30; Lieutenant-Colonel (later Sir) Charles Rowan (? 1782–1852),
who fought at Corunna, Salamanca and Waterloo
and in 1829 became the first Chief Commissioner
of the metropolitan police; Major-General Samuel
Brown, Colonel Ellecombe and LieutenantColonel Grant of the Grenadier Guards. (ref. 18)
The Athenaeum came into existence largely
through the energy and vision of John Wilson
Croker who in December 1823 sent out a prospectus describing his proposal 'to establish a Club
for scientific and literary men and Artists, on the
principles which have been so successful in the
United Service, the Union, and other clubs lately
instituted'. (ref. 19) The first meeting of the committee
was held in the rooms of the Royal Society on
16 February 1824, and shortly afterwards a temporary home for the club was found at No. 12
Waterloo Place. In April Decimus Burton was
appointed architect (ref. 20) and on 20 July a building
committee was formed. (ref. 21)
The eight members of the building committee
of the Athenaeum were the three trustees of the
club, Sir Humphry Davy (1778–1829), President
of the Royal Society, George Hamilton-Gordon,
fourth Earl of Aberdeen (1784–1860), President
of the Society of Antiquaries 1812–46 and Prime
Minister 1852–5, and Sir Thomas Lawrence
(1769–1830), President of the Royal Academy;
and also John Wilson Croker (1780–1857), member of Parliament and essayist, who was secretary
of the Admiralty for twenty-two years, Richard
Heber (1773–1833), book-collector and member
of Parliament for Oxford University 1821–6,
Charles Hatchett (? 1765–1847), chemist and
Fellow of the Royal Society, Joseph Jekyll
(? 1753–1837), King's Counsel, Fellow of the
Royal Society and member of Parliament 1787–1816, and (Sir) Robert Smirke (1781–1867),
architect of the British Museum. (ref. 22)
The first site to be considered for the club's
permanent home was on the north side of Pall
Mall East, but Burton's plans, which included a
projection of nine or ten feet over the building
line, were rejected by the New Street Commissioners and in December 1824 this site was
abandoned. (ref. 23) The Commissioners of Woods and
Forests then offered a site on the east side of Union
(now Trafalgar) Square, and in March 1825
Burton's preliminary plans for a club-house there
were approved by the committee. (ref. 24) In December
1825 the secretary of the club wrote to inform
the New Street Commissioners that the Athenaeum would prefer ground on the site of Carlton
House, then about to be demolished, (ref. 25) and
no more was done about the site in Union
Square.
The design and erection of the club-houses
On 14 February 1826 Admiral Sir Pulteney
Malcolm wrote on behalf of the United Service
Club to the Commissioners of Woods and Forests
to ask for a lease of part of the site of Carlton
House; he was informed that his application would
be considered when the ground was ready for disposal. (ref. 26) On 7 March 1826 John Nash was
appointed architect for the new United Service
club-house. (ref. 27) From the club's point of view this
seemed a wise choice. As architect to the Commissioners of Woods and Forests, Nash was
responsible for the design of the layout of the site
of Carlton House, and in obtaining the Commissioners' approval for the elevation of the new clubhouse, he must have possessed far more influence
than any other architect. In the event Nash seems
characteristically to have overrated his powers of
persuasion with the Commissioners, and the
ensuing confusion in the achievement of some
degree of uniformity between the elevations of the
United Service Club and the Athenaeum is largely
attributable to Nash's bad manners and to his
anomalous dual position.
The club's first intention seems to have been to
construct a rectangular building with a frontage
of 110 feet to Pall Mall, and the preliminary
elevations were agreed upon by Nash and the
building committee of the club; it is almost certain that the entrance was to be on the north front.
But in June 1826 the committee applied to the
Commissioners of Woods and Forests for an extra
piece of ground on the south end of the east side,
and without any frontage to Pall Mall, for the
erection of a kitchen and domestic offices. This
request was granted, Nash insisting that the
elevation of the western half of this extension
should be uniform with the design of the rest of
the southern façade. (ref. 28)
In June 1826 The Sunday Times reported that
George IV had presented the portico and staircase
at Carlton House to the United Service Club 'to
form part of their new house on the site of the
palace'. (ref. 29)
(fn. b) The columns of the portico were in
fact subsequently used by William Wilkins at the
National Gallery, (ref. 30) but the gift of the staircase of
Carlton House probably accounts for the curious
arrangement of the grand staircase of the clubhouse at right-angles to the main entrance from
Pall Mall. Speaking in 1857 Earl de Grey (formerly Lord Grantham) said that the exterior design of the club-house was left entirely to Nash,
but as chairman of the building committee, he 'had
differed with Mr. Nash as to the effect of the staircase proposed by him, and, with the greatest good
temper and equanimity Mr. Nash adopted the
suggestion which he had ventured to make'. (ref. 31)
These remarks may well mean that Lord Grantham objected to the use of the Carlton House
staircase as shown in Nash's first known plans (fn. c)
(Plate 70), and that in consequence Nash designed
the present staircase (Plates 73c, 74) to take its
place, building work having already proceeded too
far for any alteration to be made in the shape of the
staircase well.
On 20 May 1826 the secretary of the Athenaeum wrote to the Commissioners of Woods and
Forests asking for a lease of the site on which the
club-house was later erected. (ref. 32) This application
was favourably received (ref. 33) and on 19 June Nash,
as the Commissioners' architect, wrote to the club
to inform them that the elevations of the east and
north fronts of their proposed building 'must
correspond with the West Front and North Front
of the United Service Club'. This condition was
accepted, and on 20 June the secretary of the
Athenaeum informed the Commissioners that 'the
Committee of the Athenaeum hope to be consulted as to the design which they observe from
Mr. Nash's Letter is to be common to their building and to that of the other Institution'. (ref. 34)
Decimus Burton, who had been appointed architect to the Athenaeum in 1824, was instructed 'to
make sketches of a design and estimates for the
kind of building which may be erected on the
ground proposed, communicating as far as may be
necessary with Mr. Nash and the Commissioners
of Woods and Forests'. (ref. 35)
A week later the Athenaeum received a letter
from Nash which stated 'that the designs for the
United Service Club having been long since
settled, no alteration can be made in those designs
and that the peculiarity of the situation requires
that an uniformity of elevation should prevail
between the two buildings'. (ref. 36) This statement was
untrue, for the plans for the United Service clubhouse were not submitted to either the Commissioners or the club's own committee of management until October. (ref. 37) The committee of the
Athenaeum did not, of course, know this, and
merely wrote to the Commissioners asking them
to direct Nash to supply them with copies of the
north and west elevations of the United Service
club-house. (ref. 34)
On 22 August 1826 the secretary of the
Athenaeum sent Burton's sketches for the proposed club-house to the Commissioners with a
covering letter which stated that his committee
offered them 'as a project of the general character
both of elevation and distribution which they think
most likely to suit the convenience of the Club and
the real circumstances of the Ground'. (ref. 38) On
3 October he wrote again to ask for copies of the
elevation of the United Service club-house, his
committee having heard that the exterior design
had 'been definitely settled and if so the Committee
are willing to hope that they may be favoured with
a Copy of it. . . .' (ref. 34)
On 13 October Lord Grantham, chairman of
the building committee of the United Service
Club, submitted plans and elevations for the
approval of the Commissioners of Woods and
Forests—three and a half months after Nash had
informed the Athenaeum that they were unalterably settled. (ref. 28) Four days later the committee
of management of the club approved the plans and
authorized the building committee to enter into a
building contract for £31,490 with George
Harrison of 47 Ebury Street, a builder who was
'strongly recommended by Mr. Nash'. (ref. 39) The
design had not yet been approved by the Commissioners.
On 18 October the Commissioners sent a copy
of the United Service Club's plans and elevations
to the Athenaeum and invited the comments of
the latter. Six days later the committee of the
Athenaeum replied, stating that there seemed 'to
be an inconsistency between these designs and the
notification given to them [the committee] that
the Elevations of the United Service Club and
Athenaeum were to be uniform'. The design for
the United Service Club provided for the principal
façade (and presumably the entrance) to be in Pall
Mall; but the length of that club's frontage to Pall
Mall was 110 feet, whereas that of the Athenaeum
was only 75 feet. But 'as the frontage of both
Clubs towards Waterloo Place is the same viz.
about 105 feet it seems natural that the principal
Façades should be placed where they will constitute distinct and perfect elevations complete in
themselves and unconnected with any adjoining
edifices'. (ref. 40)
On 25 November the Commissioners wrote to
the United Service Club and to the Athenaeum
accepting the point that owing to the difference in
length of the two north fronts 'the Elevations of
the two Buildings in the Northern and Southern
fronts cannot be made to correspond, but that the
Commissioners must require that they should be
of the same Style of Architecture; and are of
Opinion that a Style of which the Plainness would
render the inevitable difference in the extent of the
frontage the least observable, would be preferable;
also that the two Buildings should be uniform as to
the size and situation of Doors Windows etc. etc.'
It was 'indispensably necessary' that the west and
east fronts 'should be made to correspond in every
respect, and that these two fronts should therefore
be the principal Façades of the respective Edifices'.
They went on to suggest that as these instructions
would necessitate some alteration in the plans of
both buildings the two architects and representatives from the building committees of both clubs
should confer with the Commissioners. (ref. 41)
This suggestion placed the United Service Club
in an awkward position, for their building contract had already been 'entered into under the
direction of Mr. Nash . . . [and] the Committee
were not prepared for the objections now stated'. (ref. 28)
The committee nevertheless had no option but to
comply, and on 7 December a memorandum of
agreement was signed by Lord Farnborough (fn. d) and
John Wilson Croker on behalf of the Athenaeum
and by Major-General Samuel Brown, Colonel
Alexander Caldwell and Lieutenant-Colonel
Charles Rowan on behalf of the United Service
Club. By this agreement the Athenaeum undertook to adopt the design of the west front of the
United Service Club for their entrance or east
front, subject to three modifications: firstly, that
the entrance to the Athenaeum should be in the
centre of this east front; secondly, that the height
of the upper storey should be increased by eighteen
inches if Decimus Burton should consider such an
increase necessary; and thirdly, that there should
be a balcony to each of the windows of the principal floor of the three fronts, but whether the balcony should be continuous or separate, and what
material should be used, was left for further consideration. The modifications to which the
representatives of the United Service Club agreed
were ambiguously worded in the agreement, (ref. 34) but
there was no ambiguity in the Commissioners'
letter of 14 December to Lord Grantham. By
this letter the Commissioners approved the club's
proposed designs subject to the omission of the
upper portico on the north front and of the portico
on the south front, and to the provision of 'a continuous Balcony to each of the principal floors in
each of the three fronts, according to Designs to be
previously approved by the said Commissioners'.
They also suggested that the lower windows of
the club 'might be heightened with great advantage', and that this point might be settled by Nash
and Burton. (ref. 43)
Neither Nash nor the building committee of
the United Service Club made any attempt to
comply with these modifications, and the clubhouse was built with an upper portico on the
north front, a portico on the south front, and
without a continuous balcony (Plates 68, 72).
On 14 December the committee of the Athenaeum accepted the 'stipulations contained in the
agreement of 7 December and instructed Burton
to prepare fresh plans. (ref. 34) A few days later they
received a letter from the Commissioners informing them inter alia that there must be a continuous
balcony, to be of either stone or of iron painted to
imitate stone. (ref. 44) In January 1827 a new building
committee was formed, consisting of Lord Farnborough, John Wilson Croker, Viscount Lowther
(1787–1872), later second Earl of Lonsdale, a
Tory member of Parliament 1803–41 and Chief
Commissioner of Woods and Forests 1828–30,
W. R. Hamilton (1777–1859), antiquary and
diplomatist, who as secretary to Lord Elgin had
superintended the removal to England of the Elgin
marbles in 1802, and Thomas Murdoch. (ref. 45)
Meanwhile the building committee of the
United Service Club had considered the modifications required by the Commissioners in their letter
of 14 December 1826. On 4 January 1827 the
secretary wrote protesting against the inclusion
of the continuous balcony—'our Architect is of
opinion that the adoption of the same would not
only cause . . . a very serious increase of expence,
but would also entail a great sacrifice of Architectural beauty'—and expressing the hope that the
south portico might be retained and the continuous
balcony omitted; he specifically accepted the
omission of the upper portico on the north front.
To this letter the Commissioners replied on
10 January, stating that they 'were of opinion
that the question whether there should be a continuous Balcony all round the building, or not,
would be best adjusted by conference between the
respective Architects of the Clubs'. This letter
was referred to Nash, the committee expressing
the wish that the balcony should be omitted if
possible. (ref. 28)
On 9 February the Athenaeum received the
Commissioners' approval of Burton's new plans
'and in order that the details with respect to
Balconies, Dressings of Windows etc. may
correspond with the elevations' of the United
Service Club, the Commissioners suggested 'that
the Architect of each Establishment should from
time to time communicate with the other upon
these points'. (ref. 46)
Burton immediately wrote to Nash to arrange
such a consultation. On 9 March he received a
reply from H. J. Browne, one of Nash's assistants,
stating that the committee of the United Service
Club had 'abandoned the intention' of erecting a
continuous balcony, and 'the Designs as originally
estimated from, copies of which were furnished to
you some time since, are to be strictly adhered to'.
The secretary of the Athenaeum wrote at once to
the Commissioners expressing astonishment that
their decision should have been thus set aside (ref. 34)
and on 20 March the Commissioners wrote to
Lord Grantham insisting once more on the provision of the continuous balcony. (ref. 47) Lord Grantham, on behalf of the building committee of the
United Service Club, replied that Nash had
'reported to us that the conference' suggested by
the Commissioners in their letter of 10 January
'had taken place and that the omission of the
Balcony was acquiesced in by the other architect'. (ref. 28) This second quite untrue statement by
Nash was at the time accepted by the Commissioners at its face value, but they subsequently
recorded their conviction that Burton had not
acquiesced in the omission of the balcony. (ref. 48)
In the spring of 1827 the erection of the United
Service club-house proceeded rapidly, and in April
the offer of the newly formed Junior United Service Club to purchase the club-house in Charles
Street for £15,000 was accepted; possession was
to be granted on 15 June 1828. (ref. 49) Construction
of the new house for the Athenaeum was delayed
by difficulties in obtaining possession of the site,
and eventually two sitting tenants had to be bought
out at a cost of £1500. (ref. 50) Building seems to have
begun in the spring of 1828, (ref. 51) the contractors
being Joseph Bennett and James Hunt of Horseferry Road, whose tender was for £26,715. (ref. 52)
By January 1828 work for the United Service
Club had proceeded far enough for members of
the Athenaeum to be able to see from their temporary quarters at No. 12 Waterloo Place that
there was no provision for a continuous balcony,
and the secretary therefore wrote to ask the Commissioners to take steps to produce the necessary
uniformity, the Athenaeum having already at
great expense prepared the materials for their
balcony. (ref. 34) In response to the Commissioners' request for an explanation (ref. 53) Nash stated that he had
never been consulted by the Commissioners on any
of the alterations in his original plans for the
United Service Club and that he had never
received any official letter on the subject. (ref. 28) In an
undated private letter to the secretary of the Commissioners he repeated his false assertion that
'Browne and Burton had a conference on the subject of the Balcony, when Mr. Burton acceded to
the better taste of the omission' and asserted that
minor differences were desirable, 'so persuaded am
I of the bad effect . . . of an attempt of perfect
uniformity between the details of each building'. (ref. 34)
On 18 February 1828 the Commissioners
replied to the secretary of the Athenaeum stating
that work at the United Service Club had proceeded so far that the inclusion of a continuous
balcony there would be impracticable without
considerable extra expense, and asking the building committee of the Athenaeum to consider the
omission of their balcony. (ref. 54) On 4 March the
secretary of the Athenaeum replied in surprisingly
moderate terms. His committee observed that an
upper portico was in course of erection on the
north front and a portico on the south front of the
United Service Club 'in direct contravention of
the express directions of the Commissioners
explicitly given on these very points'; he went on
to complain that 'what is now doing in the United
Service Club is precisely and identically what the
Architect of that Club originally proposed, and in
direct defiance of the agreement between the two
Clubs'. The committee of the Athenaeum would
nevertheless overlook these deviations, which
'must tend to throw a shade of inferiority' over
their own building, but their plans and contract
'oblige them to have a Balcony', and the utmost
that they would undertake was the substitution of
an inconspicuous iron railing in place of the stone
parapet and balustrade hitherto proposed. (ref. 55)
In June 1828 the secretary of the Athenaeum
complained of further minor deviations at the
United Service Club, (ref. 34) and Lord Grantham was
asked to correct them. (ref. 56) Shortly afterwards he
was informed 'that until the Commissioners shall
have come to a decision on the whole subject, no
works connected with any of the deviations may
be proceeded with'. (ref. 57)
In two letters addressed to the Commissioners
on 5 and 16 July 1828 Lord Grantham did his
best to gloss over the inexcusable behaviour of
Nash and (to a lesser degree) of the building committee of the United Service Club, and he repeated
the assertion that Burton had agreed to the
omission of the continuous balcony. (ref. 28) Burton
categorically denied this, and he informed the
Commissioners that 'under the unpleasant circumstances of conflicting statements, it is very satisfactory to me to be able to support my assertion by
undeniable facts' which he proceeded to do to the
complete satisfaction of the Commissioners. (ref. 58)
Finally on 21 July the Commissioners informed
Lord Grantham that as the deviations could not
now be corrected without considerable expense
and delay, they felt reluctant 'now to require an
alteration of the Plan which the Committee of the
United Service Club no doubt considered themselves sanctioned by the approval of their Architect who considering his public relation with this
Board ought of all persons to have been the most
careful to prevent any deviation from the Plan
originally agreed upon and approved by the Commissioners'. They therefore permitted the building to be completed and released the Athenaeum
from the agreement of 7 December 1826. (ref. 48) The
secretary of the Athenaeum was informed of this
decision, the Commissioners expressing their
'regret that the Athenaeum had had so much
cause of complaint' and expressing their thanks
for the 'conciliatory and accommodating' attitude
of the club. (ref. 59)
The dispute now ended had one most happy
result. The committee of the Athenaeum felt
that the upper portico on the north front of the
United Service Club tended 'to throw an air of
inferiority over the Athenaeum, which they think
may be in some degree corrected by giving a bolder
proportion and more ornamental Character to the
Cornice and Frieze'. On 25 July the secretary of
the club wrote to the Commissioners asking for
permission (which was granted on the very next
day) to erect the frieze which was to become the
most famous and most gracious architectural
feature of the building. 'The Cornice they would
wish to adopt is one proportioned to the size and
character of their Building, and for their Frieze
they would wish to adopt a compleat Fac simile of
the Panathenaic procession which formed the
Frieze of the Parthenon. The incomparable
Beauty of this specimen of Athenian Art induces
the Committee to make a great sacrifice in point
of expence in order to place it in a situation so
conspicuous and at nearly the same height as that
at which it was placed in the Building from which
it was taken.' (ref. 60) It may reasonably be supposed
that W. R. Hamilton, who was a member of the
building committee and had in 1802 superintended
the removal of the Elgin marbles to England, had
an important share in this choice. John Henning
the younger, of 2 Somers Place West, New Road,
contracted to execute the frieze in Bath stone
from the Elgin marbles in the British Museum
for £1300. (ref. 61) The frieze was probably the joint
work of John Henning the elder and his two sons,
John and Samuel. (ref. 62)
The United Service club-house was opened for
members' use on 18 November 1828. (ref. 63) The
original estimate for building and furnishing the
house was £38,290; the actual cost seems to have
been about £43,700. (ref. 64)
The iron railing finally erected on the principal
floor of the Athenaeum (Plates 69, 79) was a reversion to the original design which Burton had
proposed before the agreement of 7 December
1826. (ref. 34) After the release of the club from this
agreement in July 1828, the committee decided to
increase the size and dressings of the windows (ref. 65) and
at the annual general meeting of 11 May 1829 it
was decided 'to leave to the discretion of the Committee the propriety of erecting a more spacious
portico'. (ref. 66) A more elaborate portico than had
previously been proposed was evidently erected at
an extra cost of £1000; (ref. 67) the statue of Athene
was the work of Edward Hodges Baily, R.A., and
was erected in 1830. (ref. 62) The club-house was first
occupied by members on 8 February 1830; (ref. 68) its
total cost including furniture and architect's
commission was £43,101. (ref. 69) At the end of the
same month the building committee decided to
retain the cast of the Belvedere Apollo which had
been temporarily placed for their approval in the
recess on the principal staircase; it has remained
there ever since, the personal gift to the club of
Decimus Burton. (ref. 70)
Later history of the United Service Club
Nash's United Service club-house has never
evoked the same degree of admiration as Burton's
Athenaeum. In 1844 The Builder described the
exterior as insipid, and the interior as cold, dull and
monotonous. (ref. 71) At the annual general meeting of
1834 it was decided to have plans prepared by
H. J. Browne, 'late in the employ of Mr. Nash',
for the removal of the entrance from Pall Mall to
Waterloo Place, but the proposal proved impracticable. (ref. 72) In 1842 this suggestion was again
put forward with the same result. In that year
Decimus Burton, who had become consulting
architect to the club, superintended general repairs estimated at over £6000, which included reinstatement of 'the Turret over the Grand Stairs,
the Ceiling having dropped in the centre about
3½ inches owing to the defective construction of
the main timbers of the Roof'. (ref. 73) In 1844 the ends
of the entrance portico were enclosed with plate
glass 'as at the Athenaeum Club'. (ref. 74)
In 1858 the club purchased the adjoining house
on the east side, No. 117 Pall Mall, and Burton
submitted plans for the extension, embellishment
and general repair of the club-house. These provided for the erection on the site of No. 117 of a
new dining-room, with smoking- and billiardrooms on the first floor, and for the enlargement of
the entrance hall by the removal of the two small
rooms on either side and the substitution of a small
space for the porter. The morning-room on the
west side was to be enlarged by the removal of the
partition (fn. e) separating it from the old dining-room,
and the deal doors to all the principal rooms were
to be replaced by mahogany. Alterations to the
exterior included the removal of the portico on the
west front, the enlargement of the main cornice
and of the balustrade, and the addition of a bold
frieze; the figures in the pediment on the Pall Mall
front were added at the suggestion of James
Pennethorne, architect to the Commissioners of
Woods and Forests. All the window dressings
and the rustication of the ground floor were
enriched, the columns of the upper portico
were fluted, and the iron area railings were
replaced by a stone balustrade. The defective
exterior stucco was replaced by Portland
cement. (ref. 75)
All these alterations were carried out in 1858–1859, Messrs. Cubitt being the contractors; the
total cost exclusive of the purchase of No. 117 Pall
Mall was probably £18,060. (ref. 76) Apart from the
later addition of the attic storey, the exterior of the
main body of the club-house today is almost
exactly as Burton left it (Plate 72).
In 1886 the room on the east side of the
entrance hall was joined to the dining-room
erected in 1858–9 on the site of No. 117 Pall
Mall, and a second pair of columns was set up
there. (ref. 77)
In 1912 the two houses on the east side of the
club-house were purchased and rebuilt, about
forty bedrooms being provided. The old coffee-room, which occupied the whole of the south side
of the main building, was converted into a smokin-groom. The total cost of these extensive alterations
and additions was £70,000; the work was completed in March 1913, (ref. 78) the architects being
Messrs. Thompson and Walford.
In 1929–30 the mansard roof was reconstructed
to provide squash courts and additional bedrooms.
The architects were Messrs. Thompson and
Walford. (ref. 79)
Architectural description of the United Service Club
Nash's first known plans for the club-house
(Plate 70) show a building fronting 110 feet to
Pall Mall, 100 feet to Waterloo Place, and 166
feet to Carlton House Terrace, in form roughly a
square with a south-east extension, 52 feet deep.
The entrance on the Pall Mall front is in the centre
of a hexastyle portico, this possibly being an intended re-use of the Carlton House portico. An
entrance hall, 26 feet wide and 21 feet deep, is
flanked by a waiting-room (left) and a porter's
room (right) and opposite the doorway is a
columned screen of three bays opening to a transverse corridor. At its east end is a door to a diningroom, 35 feet long and 25 feet wide, with two
windows overlooking Pall Mall. A corresponding
door at the west end of the corridor leads to the
morning-room, 44 feet long and 28 feet wide,
with two windows to Pall Mall and three to
Waterloo Place. At its south end a two-leaf door
opens into another dining-room, 28 feet by 20
feet, with two windows to Waterloo Place. The
core of the plan is the staircase hall with the stair
rising on an east-west axis. The approach by way
of a small ante off the east end of the entrance
hall corridor is a curiously twisted arrangement
which can probably be accounted for by the
original intention to use, in the new club-house,
Holland's ovoid staircase from Carlton House. (fn. f)
Another small ante, at the south end of the staircase hall, leads to a short east-west corridor with
two doors opening to the coffee-room, 99 feet long
and 30 feet wide, with six windows to Carlton
House Terrace and two to Waterloo Place, its
great length divided by widely intercolumniated
screens into three bays, an oblong between two
squares. The eastern extension contains the
kitchen, scullery, larder and servants' coffee-room.
The first-floor layout (Plate 70a) is simple and
spacious, with the Carlton House staircase rising
in the middle of a splendid hall, 39 feet by 49 feet,
with two doorways in each wall. Those on the
south open to the library, the same size as the
coffee-room below. On the east are the map-room
and the card-room, corresponding, respectively, to
the dining-room and morning-room below. On
the north is the reading-room, 39 feet by 16 feet,
and on the west is the billiard-room, 25 feet by
28 feet. Behind this last are lavatories, a service
staircase, etc.
Nash's plans appear to have been carried out
with only one major deviation—the change
affecting the staircase. Lord Grantham's differences with Nash over this matter (see page 387)
may have meant that Nash, with his customary
good nature, gave up the idea of using the Carlton
House staircase for which his plan had been contrived. No doubt the well had already been formed,
and it was too late for him to change the axis of
the stairs. A plan by William Burn of the ground
storey (Plate 71b) appears to show the building as
finished by Nash, but has the staircase rising round
three sides of the ground-storey well; there is no
other evidence to suggest that the stair was built in
this way. Burn's plan shows the porticoes, each
of three bays between paired columns, projecting centrally from the north, west and south
fronts, that on the west (Waterloo Place) front
having, presumably, been added to balance that of
the Athenaeum.
A ground-storey plan by Burton, (ref. 80) dated 26 June
1858, shows his proposals for altering the building. The hall is enlarged by taking in the porter's
room and waiting-room, and a small draughtlobby and porter's box of wood and glass are
introduced. The south wall between the morningroom and the west dining-room is removed, and
a new dining-room is provided in an annexe built
on to the east side of the Pall Mall front, the old
east dining-room becoming a writing-room. At
present, this last forms part of a large coffee-room,
occupying the ground storey of the extension built
in 1912 (see page 392), and the coffee-room overlooking Carlton House Terrace is now a smokin-groom.
Exterior
In accordance with the general policy of the
Commissioners, relating to buildings in or connected with the New Street, both Nash's and Burton's club-houses were finished with cement or
mastic stucco frescoed to imitate Bath stone. As
to the design of their buildings, it seems obvious
that while both architects recognized the need for
a general uniformity, they probably chafed at the
idea of two more or less identical buildings, as required by the Commissioners. In the event, both
favoured the Graeco-Roman style, but Nash
inclined to Rome and Burton to Greece. Here it
may be remarked that the United Service Club
has never received one-half of the admiration
lavished on the Athenaeum, yet it is a comely
building and was even better before Burton 'improved' it.
There are two well-defined and lofty storeys,
the lower Doric and the upper Corinthian (Plates
68, 71a, 72). The Waterloo Place elevation has
seven widely spaced windows in each storey, and
so has the Carlton Gardens front. The entrance
front to Pall Mall is divided into three parts, either
side having two windows in each storey. The
middle part projects and is fronted with a twostoreyed portico of three bays, with paired
columns of the appropriate order, fluted Doric
below and Corinthian (originally unfluted) above,
this stage being finished with a triangular pediment. In 1858–9 its plain tympanum was filled
with sculpture, under Burton's direction and at
Pennethorne's suggestion. Originally, the groundstorey windows were placed, without dressings or
voussoir-joints, in a horizontally V-jointed face,
but Burton gave them moulded and eared architraves, centred lion masks over them, and framed
them in segmental-arched recesses, with scrolled
keystones and arris-beads of laurel leaves. He also
added vertical joints to the coursed face, which
Nash had finished with an entablature having
triglyphs and mutules. The upper storey has a
plain face, originally marked with joints to simulate masonry. A pedestal-course links the blind
balustrades below the windows, each of which is
dressed with a moulded architrave, flanked by
pilaster-strips and consoles supporting a triangular
pediment. Burton made only one substantial
change to this storey by substituting a rich
Italianate frieze of scrolls and cartouches for
Nash's Corinthian architrave and plain frieze.
The dentilled and modillioned cornice is Nash's
and so, probably, is the crowning balustrade. The
Carlton House Terrace front retains its Doric
portico of three bays, but that on the Waterloo
Place front was removed in 1858–9, Burton and
the Commissioners agreeing that its retention 'for
the purpose of uniformity is not very material'. (ref. 81)
Burton also removed the crown glass and sash bars
from Nash's windows, replacing them with large
sheets of plate glass, and he effected at least one
improvement by substituting, for Nash's meagre
iron railing, an area balustrade of stone with
a cast-iron cornice, on which standard lamps
and gas-flambeaux are mounted at appropriate
intervals.
In designing the elevation of the projecting bay,
added in 1858–9 at the east end of the Pall Mall
front, Burton departed from Nash by omitting the
Doric entablature from the ground storey, and
substituting for Nash's Corinthian entablature a
bracketed one of Italianate character. Moreover,
he gave his first-floor window a segmental pediment. When, however, this bay was absorbed into
the large extension built in 1912, the upper storey
was designed to accord fully with that of the main
building (Plate 72). The mansard roof, reconstructed in 1929–30, is of slate with ornamental dressings and acroters of lead.
Interior
The doorway, in the middle bay of the Pall
Mall portico, opens through a glass and mahogany
draught-lobby into the oblong entrance hall (Plate
73b). The long side opposite the doorway is
formed as a screen of five bays, raised two steps
above the hall-floor level, and beyond it is an ante
or corridor. Each end bay of the screen contains a
round-arched opening, with a fret band-architrave
and impost, the latter being continued round the
side and end wall faces of the hall and corridor.
The middle three bays are divided by two Ionic
columns which, with the respondent antae, have
plain shafts of dark green scagliola. The hall is
finished with an entablature having a dentilled
cornice, and a deep plain cove rises to the plain
flat ceiling. On the east end wall of the hall is a
large clock-face, set in the space above the impostband, and on the west wall is a wind dial. The
wall behind the screen is divided by antae into three
bays, the middle one containing a niche in which
stands a terminal bust of Wellington, signed by
Benedetto Pistrucci.
At each end of the corridor, or ante, is an
arched opening, that at the west end leading
through a small compartment into the staircase
hall, by far the finest internal feature of the building (Plates 73a, 73c, 74). The stone stairway, rising
in three easy flights to the first-floor level, begins
with a wide central flight, branches left and right,
and returns with parallel flights to the spacious
landing which surrounds the large oblong well.
The stairs and landing are railed in with waisted
balusters and newels of cast iron, of RegencyGrecian design, finished with a plain mahogany
handrail. The soffits of the stairs are arched and
coffered, but the walls of the lower stage are
simply treated except for the doorway to the
morning-room and the niche at the head of the
first flight. In this niche stands the marble statue
of the Duke of York and Albany, signed 'Thos.
Campbell fecit. Roma 1829'. The walls of the
first-floor stage are also plain but for the doorcases,
which are symmetrically disposed—one at each
end of the south wall and three in the west wall—
this arrangement being repeated in the north and
east walls. The mahogany doors, each of two
leaves with two panels, are framed in architraves
and finished with frieze and cornice, the middle
doorway on each long side having, in addition,
panelled pilaster-strips and consoles supporting a
triangular pediment. The walls are now finished
with a full entablature, of which the dentilled cornice is probably original, but the Adamesque frieze
is a modern addition. The engraving in London
Interiors (Plate 74a) shows that the walls were
originally finished with a plain cornice resting on
paired console-brackets, and that the ceiling cove
was patterned with octagonal and diamondshaped coffers. The present arabesque decoration
of the cove is at variance with the flat ceiling of
the clerestoried lantern-light, which, if modern,
has the character of the original work. It is
divided by guilloche-ribs into compartments, the
small corner squares containing formal flowerand-leaf bosses, and the narrow oblongs between
them being plain. The large oblong central compartment is panelled, the central circle containing an anthemion-bordered foliage-boss (replacing
a sun-burner) from which hangs the splendid
chandelier, with crystal banners radiating from its
head.
The most impressive ground-floor room is the
smoking-room, formerly the coffee-room, overlooking Carlton House Terrace (Plate 75b). This
has the appearance of a suite of three rooms linked
by very wide openings in the transverse walls, with
widely spaced Ionic columns supporting the
entablature-faced beams. These columns have
plain shafts of Siena-marbled scagliola (originally
red granite), and the entablature is continued on
all the wall faces. Cornice-ribs, with fret-moulded
soffits, divide each ceiling into panels—a large
oblong, or square, bordered by narrow oblongs
with small squares in the corners. There is a fireplace in each compartment of the room, that in
the middle being below the central window in the
south wall, the others being in the north wall. The
first has an arched chimneypiece of white marble,
probably designed by Burton, and the last have
simple chimneypieces of black marble, similar to
others in the building. The two doorways to the
room are in the middle compartment, flanking a
segmental-arched recess which is a later alteration.
They are furnished with the mahogany twoleaved doors designed by Burton to replace Nash's
cheap deal doors. The wall faces, above the lowpanelled dado, are generally left plain as a ground
for pictures.
The morning-room, enlarged by Burton to include the adjoining dining-room, has been restored
to its original size. It is simply decorated, the walls
having a plain face for pictures over the dado.
Above the dentilled cornice rises a plain cove,
separated from the flat ceiling by a band of Pompeian scroll ornament. This room has a black
marble chimneypiece, similar to those in the
smoking-room. The former dining-room on the
east side of the hall (now part of the present coffee-room) has an unusual chimneypiece of white
marble, Graeco-Egyptian in design with columnar
jambs carved with ivy-decked thyrsi.
The library (Plate 75a) is similar in its general
form to the smoking-room below it, except that
the divisions between the three compartments are
less prominent, the columns being more widely
spaced and paired with pilasters instead of return
walls. The Corinthian order is used here, the
column-shafts being of scagliola resembling greygreen granite. The entablature surrounding each
compartment has a modillioned cornice, above
which a plain cove rises to a guilloche band
framing the flat ceiling, plain but for a central
ventilator-boss fringed with formal leaves. Each
compartment has a fireplace, with a white marble
chimneypiece surmounted by a tall framed glass.
The Grecian gilt-wood valance poles, resting on
consoles, show that the windows were once furnished with elaborate draperies. No provision
seems to have been made for fitted bookcases and
those that line the walls at dado height are modern.
The luncheon-room (originally the card-room)
is simply decorated with a panelled dado, plain wall
face finished with a modillioned cornice, and a
plain cove surrounding the flat ceiling. The
committee-room (originally the reading-room) is
similar.
Later history of the Athenaeum
Apart from the addition of the attic storey in
1899–1900 and the erection of the present parapet enclosing the area (1894), the exterior of
the Athenaeum has only received alterations of the
most trivial nature since the completion of the
building in 1830. The interior has naturally been
subjected to more important modifications, but
changes have only been made after the most careful consideration, and the loving care of successive
generations of members, combined with the
cautious wisdom of the Commissioners of Woods
and Forests, has successfully preserved the architectural grace and dignity of the building.
Decimus Burton continued as architect to the
club until 1864. (ref. 82) During this period no major
alterations were made, although important proposals were considered on several occasions.
Lighting, ventilation and library accommodation
provided the first problems. In 1831 a gallery was
erected in the library (ref. 83) and in 1843 an improved
system of gas lighting invented by Michael Faraday was installed there. (ref. 84) In 1856 a new gallery
with a spiral staircase was erected in the south
library, and the existing gallery was enlarged. (ref. 85)
General repairs and redecoration were carried out
in 1836, 1845 and 1856. (ref. 86)
In 1853–4 the committee considered a large
number of proposals for increasing the accommodation in the club-house, and in his account of the
numerous proposals put forward Burton states
that he 'received the opinions of several Members
of the Club and of the Committee on the mode
they thought the house should be altered, of which
no two coincided'. On the instructions of the
committee Burton made plans which provided
inter alia for the enlargement of the morningroom by the erection of a bow window on the Pall
Mall front, a proposal which Burton himself
regarded as objectionable (ref. 87) and which the Commissioners of Woods and Forests (on the advice
of Pennethorne) fortunately refused to sanction. (ref. 88) Burton also made the ingenious suggestion
of providing a kitchen under the garden on the
south side of the building, 'the smoke and heat
from which would be carried over the roof of the
house, in an ornamental tower'. (ref. 87) In 1855 the
Commissioners approved plans for an additional
storey, (ref. 89) but no major alterations appear to have
been made in the 1850's, and in 1857 Burton was
paid £400 for his largely abortive professional services during the preceding four years. (ref. 90)
In 1863 a sub-committee was appointed to
consider what (if any) alterations should be made
to the club-house. Its report, which again
suggested throwing out a bow window on the
north front and the addition of an extra storey,
was considered at the annual general meeting of
1864, but no action was taken. (ref. 91) In the same year
T. H. Wyatt succeeded Burton as architect, and
in 1865 general repairs costing £6670 included
the substitution of Portland cement in place of the
original stucco on the exterior of the building. (ref. 92)
In 1867 the Commissioners of Woods and
Forests approved plans submitted by T. H. Wyatt
for the erection of an exceedingly unsightly
smoking-room in the roof of the Pall Mall front. (ref. 88)
At this time smoking in the club-house was confined to one small attic, and after the appointment
in May 1867 of a sub-committee to consider 'how
to provide adequately for Smoking in the Club',
the annual general meeting of 1868 decided to
construct a smoking-room, billiard-room and
servants' hall under the garden on the south side. (ref. 93)
This extension, which involved the removal of
one or two trees and provoked the active opposition of Lord Otho Fitzgerald of No. 8 Carlton
House Terrace, was carried out to the design of
T. H. Wyatt in 1868–9 at a cost of £4181. (ref. 94)
In 1880 T. H. Wyatt died and was succeeded
as architect by Charles Barry, junior. The
general repairs of 1883 included a new mosaic
pavement in the hall. (ref. 95) At the annual general
meetings of 1887 and 1888 plans for an extra
storey and for extensive alterations to the main
staircase were rejected. Exterior work done in
1894 included marble steps and mosaic pavement
in the porch, and the erection of the present stone
parapet enclosing the area. (ref. 96)
In 1891 a sub-committee consisting of (Sir)
Lawrence Alma-Tadema, R.A., (Sir) Edward
Poynter, later President of the Royal Academy,
and (Sir) Arthur Lucas, a gas engineer, (ref. 97) was
appointed to superintend the redecoration of the
entrance hall and grand staircase. (ref. 98) This subcommittee introduced the present coloured marble
lining of the lower wall surfaces (ref. 99) and AlmaTadema designed the painted decoration of the
hall ceiling. During the next twenty-one years the
sub-committee superintended the redecoration of
all the principal rooms—the coffee-, morning- and
writing-rooms to Poynter's designs in 1892, and
all the rooms on the first floor to Alma-Tadema's
designs in 1893. In 1904 the hall and staircase,
and in 1907 the drawing-room, were repainted
with only minor alterations to the previous designs, and in 1910 the morning- and writingrooms were redecorated, Poynter's designs of
1892 being followed with some small additions. (ref. 100)
Other artists who are said to have assisted in the
decoration of the club are James Fergusson, Lord
Leighton. Sir Frank Dicksee and Sir William
Llewellyn. (ref. 101)
In 1898 a sub-committee was set up to consider
once more the addition of an extra storey. Charles
Barry resigned as architect at about this time and
T. E. Collcutt was chosen to succeed him. His
plans for a recessed attic storey were carried out in
1899–1900 at a cost of £15,427. (ref. 102) The new
accommodation included a smoking-room, cardroom and improved staff quarters.
In 1927 the interior of the top storey was remodelled to the design of Sir Aston Webb.
The coffee-room was redecorated to the design
of Professor Sir Albert Richardson, President of
the Royal Academy, in 1956.
Architectural description of the Athenaeum
The Athenaeum is a smaller building than the
United Service Club, and although it has almost
the same frontage towards Waterloo Place (105
feet) it fronts only some 75 feet to Pall Mall and
Carlton House Terrace. Burton's plan (fn. g) is simple,
but most effective (Plates 76, 77). The ground
storey is divided into three almost equal sections by
transverse walls. The middle section, fronted by
the Waterloo Place portico, contains the hall and
staircase, entered through a shallow vestibule
flanked by a porter's box and a waiting-room. The
hall, which is some 35 feet wide and 30 feet deep
(excluding the stair-well), is divided into a 'nave'
and 'aisles' by colonnades of three bays. At the
west end is the stair-well with the staircase rising
in a wide central flight, then branching right and
left, and returning with parallel flights against the
side walls to finish at the wide first-floor landing.
South of the hall and stair-well is the coffee-room,
some 30 feet wide and 74 feet long, with five windows to Carlton House Terrace and two to
Waterloo Place. North of the hall is the morningroom, some 30 feet square, with two windows in
each outside wall. Alongside is a room, about
22 feet by 24 feet, originally designated a diningroom, and between this and the hall is a service
stair. West of the dining-room are lavatories and
behind the main stair-well is a narrow light area.
The staircase rises to a wide first-floor landing,
with two doors in the east wall and one each in the
north and south walls. The two east doors open
to the drawing-room of three linked compartments, 100 feet long and 30 feet 7 inches wide,
with seven windows to Waterloo Place and two in
each end wall. Adjoining on the south is a library,
about 30 feet wide and 43 feet long, and on the
north is a smaller library, originally designated a
reading-room, west of which is the committeeroom, intended as a map-room.
The basement is given over to kitchens on the
north, butler's and housekeeper's rooms on the
south, and wine cellarage under the hall and
portico. Staff and servants' rooms are provided in
the small mezzanines over the ground- and firstfloor rooms in the north-west angle, and in the
mansard garret storey.
Exterior
In mass and composition, and in finish, the
Athenaeum is the counterpart of Nash's United
Service Club, but Burton displayed his own taste in
the details (Plates 69, 78, 79). Again there are two
lofty storeys, each well defined in treatment and
finished with an entablature. There are seven
windows in the upper storey of the Waterloo Place
front, and five in each storey of the fronts to Pall
Mall and Carlton House Terrace. The ground
storey is rusticated with channel joints, and the
windows, which have moulded architraves, are set
with plain margins in shallow recesses with
voussoired flat arches. The Doric entablature of
this storey is ingeniously adapted to carry the firstfloor balcony, each alternate triglyph being a
concave-curving bracket supporting the boldly
projecting cornice which forms the balcony floor.
The railing, with slender Grecian balusters of
cast iron, is stopped at each corner by a pedestal
bearing a tripod lamp and by the stone balustrade
over the entrance portico, in the middle of the
Waterloo Place front. This Roman Doric portico
is divided into three bays by paired columns, each
pair being raised on a plain pedestal with steps
between them. The columns have moulded bases,
fluted shafts (except for each end column which is
square and plain-shafted) and enriched capitals.
Originally, the portico had open ends, but by 1841
these had been filled in with windows matching
those of the ground storey. The entablature, with
triglyphed frieze and mutuled cornice, is surmounted by a pedestal parapet, with open balustrades above each end bay and the returns. The
solid die above the middle bay supports the gilt
statue of Athene, carved by E. H. Baily, and the
dies over the paired columns are adorned with
laurel wreaths. The upper storey is mock-jointed
to resemble a smooth ashlar face, and the windows,
tall and rectangular, are dressed each with a
moulded architrave flanked by pilaster-strips with
acanthus consoles supporting a cornice. John
Henning junior's version of the Panathenaic
frieze, carved in Bath stone but now painted in the
Wedgwood manner, provides a splendid adornment to this storey, which is finished with an
enriched dentilled and modillioned cornice, and
surmounted by a balustrade.
After the building was completed there were
many proposals to make alterations which would
have affected its external appearance. Burton was
asked to add a bay window to the Pall Mall front,
and in 1855 he suggested raising the crowning
cornice and inserting a range of attic windows over
the Panathenaic frieze. T. H. Wyatt proposed
even more drastic changes, and so did Charles
Barry, junior, but fortunately no noticeable
alteration was made until 1899–1900 when the
recessed attic stage was added, with perfect taste,
by T. E. Collcutt. This attic, although containing
two storeys on its north side, is quite unobtrusive.
Finished in stucco and fully consonant with Burton's work, it has the same number of windows as
the second storey of the original building, all
finished with moulded and eared architraves.
Collcutt originally intended to support the simply
moulded entablature with paired Doric pilasters
placed between the windows, but fortunately he
decided to omit them.
Interior
The superiority of Burton's club-house to
Nash's is even more evident inside than out. The
columned hall (Plate 80), with its subdued daylighting, and the branching staircase beyond,
brightly lit from above, provide an impressive
approach to the great drawing-room which is
one of the finest rooms of its kind in London.
Colonnades of three bays, the middle bay being
nearly twice as wide as the others, divide the hall
into a wide 'nave' and narrow 'aisles'. The
columns have moulded bases, plain shafts originally
of white marbled scagliola, and 'Tower of the
Winds' capitals, each end column being paired
with a square pillar. The entablature of each
colonnade is returned across the east (entrance)
end of the 'nave' and back across the 'aisle' at the
staircase end, and whereas the 'nave' has a segmental vault modelled with square coffers, the
'aisles' have flat compartmented ceilings. Centrally placed in each side wall is a niche, framed
with a wide architrave and containing a white
marble chimneypiece surmounted by a castplaster statue. These casts, which were chosen on
the advice of Sir Thomas Lawrence, are of the
'Venus Victrix' (north niche) and the 'Robing
Diana' (south niche). Hanging from the panelled
soffit of each entablature, one in each bay, are gilt
metal lamps of Grecian design, the glass bowl
being held in a collar decorated with Athene's
owls and suspended by three chains of stiff foliage.
Alma-Tadema's colour treatment of the hall,
with glossy golden-yellow columns glowing
against putty-lemon walls, would seem to have
been nearer in spirit to Burton's original decoration than the present scheme with its sombre black
columns. (ref. 103)
Beginning with three curved and wide-spreading curtail steps, the middle flight of the stone
staircase rises to a landing, branches right and
left to smaller landings, and returns to the
gallery landing on the first floor (Plate 81). The
mahogany handrail is carried by elegant Grecian
'palm-tree' balusters of cast iron, linked in pairs at
their bases and fixed to the sides of the steps, free of
the treads. The staircase walls are lined to the
first-floor level with slabs of richly figured
marble, finished with a moulded architrave and
key-fret band in painted plaster. A wide break
forward in the middle of the west wall, opposite
the gallery landing, forms a plinth for a pseudoportico, distyle in antis, of the Corinthian order,
in which stands a gilded plaster cast of the Belvedere Apollo raised on a marbled pedestal. The
columns have plain shafts and their capitals are a
simplified version of those on the Lysicrates
monument. This pseudo-portico dominates the
first-floor stage of the stair hall, and the other wall
faces are simply divided into panels by raised and
enriched mouldings. The Corinthian entablature
is carried round all four walls and the flat ceiling is
modelled with shallow compartments, surrounding
the clerestoried octagonal lantern-light. AlmaTadema designed the hanging lantern, a somewhat Art Nouveau creation with elaborate jewelfaceted panels of glass. (ref. 103)
A doorway on the south side of the entrance
hall leads to the coffee-room, a spacious apartment
simply decorated (Plate 83a). The wall faces
above the pedestal dado are formed into panels,
wide alternating with narrow, by a raised and enriched moulding. A rich dentilled cornice
surrounds the flat ceiling, which is divided by plain
ribs into compartments, squares and oblongs bordering three central circles, each containing an
elaborate chandelier rose composed of three rings
of radiating leaves. The 'Pompeian' stencilling of
Sir Edward Poynter has been replaced by the
chaste grey, pale green, white and gold scheme of
Sir Albert Richardson, but Burton's sumptuous
four-branched lamps of gilded metal still hang
from the ceiling roses.
The morning-room, north of the entrance hall,
has walls hung with lincrusta in imitation of
embossed and gilded Cordova leather, below Burton's very Grecian anthemion-enriched coved
cornice. The ceiling has a large circular panel and
four small spandrels, the colour decoration being
by Poynter.
As is usual in the great early nineteenth-century
club-houses, the great length of the drawing-room
is divided into three compartments, a square
at each end and an oblong in the middle (Plate
82). The division is effected by columns, standing just free of the walls, placed in pairs between
the compartments and one in each corner of the
room, all with respondent antae. The Corinthian
order is used, the columns and antae having plain
shafts of Siena-marbled scagliola, and simplified
'Lysicrates' capitals. They support lateral and
transverse entablature-beams, having panelled
soffits and scroll-modillioned cornices, so that the
ceiling of each compartment is surrounded by a
full entablature, free of the walls. Each compartment has its fireplace, the middle one central in
the west wall, between two doorways, and one in
each end wall, between the windows. Each has a
white marble chimneypiece of monumental form,
with panelled pilasters carrying the lintel between
cenotaph-like pedestals decorated with wreaths.
Above is a large plate mirror, within a wide plain
margin framed by pilasters with panelled shafts
and capitals based on an anta-capital from the
temple of Apollo at Miletus. They carry a frieze,
enriched with anthemion, and a curious cornice.
The great door in each end compartment, and the
smaller doors in the middle compartment, are all
of two leaves each with three panels and wide
moulded rails. The doorcases have moulded
architraves, plain friezes and cornices, those of the
larger doorcases resting on scroll-consoles. Each
compartment has a flat ceiling, a treatment intended by Burton for the end compartments only,
as a contrast to the ribbed saucer-dome of oval
plan on shallow pendentives with which he
finished the middle compartment. This highly
decorative feature was, unfortunately, sacrificed
to gain floor-space when the upper storeys were
added. It remains to record that the walls, where
they are not concealed by the later bookcases, are
covered with yellow silk damask.
Four of Burton's schemes for decorating the
drawing-room are preserved in the club-house.
All are delightful and elegant, very much of their
period and reminiscent of a Henry Moses engraving. The scheme approved by the committee
on 25 June 1829, and presumably carried out, has
pale green walls with gilt motifs like vase-subjects
over the doors and windows, between which are
banquettes placed below tall pier glasses, partly
concealed by muslin and purple silk draperies. An
alternative scheme has apricot-coloured walls, the
doors are white and gold with grisaille panels over
them, there are dado-high bookcases of rosewood
partly gilt, and the windows are veiled with muslin
and dressed with pale claret curtains, elaborately
draped.
There is little to say about the south library
(Plate 83b), which is furnished and decorated with
books, as are all good libraries. These provide a
rich background for the spidery elegance of the
galleries, in mahogany and brass, and the curved
and spiral stair of delicate cast ironwork which
leads to them. The ceiling is simply patterned
with shallow twice-recessed coffers. The north
library is similar, though smaller, and has no staircase within the room.