Monday, November 3.
[Debate on Grievances.]
Sir Thomas Meres.] Several Grievances were enumerated the other day—For that of Popery directions were
given for a Bill to be drawn, which is near finished—The
next Grievance he thinks fit to propose is that of a
"Standing army," taken by every one as a "Grievance."
Some said it was to land to beat the Dutch (fn. 1) ; but it turned
off, it seems, to take Harwich, as you have been told. He
has been informed that they are of no service; the King's
treasure is wasted by them, so that aids are asked twice
in one year—Loves not to be the first man that moves a
thing, but would now form you a Question, "That this
Standing Army is a Grievance" The reasons for it—It
brings in the billetting of soldiers, against the Petition of
Right—The last Session they took five pence from persons to be exempted from quartering soldiers, and now
it is raised to sixpence, not only in inns and alehouses,
but in private houses (a man's house is his castle) contrary to the privileges of the English subjects—You are told
also of Martial Law, made for the governing these men,
against all the laws of England. Martial Law has arbitrary principles and arbitrary power—We like not these
arbitrary principles in any Councils—This army has the
youth of the nation; it debauches them, and fills them
with such principles, that towns by them are debauched;
common violences they commit; he will only remind you
of that at Colchester (fn. 2) and in Surry. Besides the "French
League" and "evil Counsellors," this is still a terror in
our fears of Popery—If any one of these are left out, it
will help to set up the other three—Asks, at last, That
this may be voted "a Grievance;"—The others are
"Grievances," but the army is a Legion; and, to follow the metaphor, hopes they shall not be choaked in the
sea, nor cast away beyond sea, to support this alliance, but
disbanded.
Sir Eliab Harvey.] Knows of abundance of Petitions
that will be presented you, against these men—If you
send them abroad, they must be turned Catholics, and
so many sent us back again—Hopes you will vote it
"a Grievance."
Mr Secretary Coventry.] Would have you agree upon
terms, what is "an Army," and what "a Standing
Army"—Knows not why they are called Legions, for
among the Romans a Legion was a band of two thousand
men—He is unwilling that his country should be exposed; but now you are in a war, thinks not that you
intend that the King should fall down, and beg a peace
of Holland—They know what your trained bands are,
since the business of Landguard point—For the King to
raise troops is not against law, but for those troops to be
disorderly is against law; but if such a Captain, or company, has done ill without order, it is no "general
Grievance"—Two Vintners killed two Gentlemen; shall
Vintners therefore be "a Grievance?" Some Merchants
robbed upon the highway; must all Merchants therefore
be "a Grievance?" The Gentleman is not well informed about Martial Law; it is as it ever was—In Lord
Strafford's command, and the Earl of Holland's, when he
disbanded the Northern army, and those of Lord Essex's
army (we may learn of our enemies) these were compared with all articles, and the best were extracted, and
you will find them no French articles—Hopes you will
not say, it is not in the King's power to raise men, but
let Gentlemen show you any disorders owned by authority, and it is another case—But how will you vote this
"a Grievance," when there is no illegality in it, only
exorbitances of particular persons? Hopes you will not
vote it "a Grievance."
Sir Thomas Lee.] Thought, that, though the practice
of accumulative treason against Lord Strafford was condemned, yet his setting up Martial Law was justly disapproved then—The oaths in the articles, he is sure, are
not legal—But you are told of "Vintners" and "Merchants," and "that these exorbitances are not allowed;"
but if we have no Grievances till they are allowed by Authority, we shall never have any—But they are to have another sort of tryal than other men, and that makes them a
terror—You have been told this morning, "that upon their
marches they have been quartered in private houses in Hampshire, and that they made people bring out their provisions,
or they would take them by force in their marches." They
are taught to believe that they may do it; and should
you make this Address to the King, he would find it "a
Grievance" as well as you—You are now arming the
King; nothing disarms him more than these exorbitances—But must these dragoons ride over the sea? We
have no wooden horses to carry them, and by this you
give the Dutch great advantage—We had success by the
militia in 1588; you had no army but them at that
time—It has ever been the custom, that when men have
been thus raised they have been complained of as "a
Grievance," especially we wanting hands and mouths
now in the nation; and would now have it voted "a
Grievance."
Sir Robert Howard.] Has heard a worthy Knight
(Clarges) talk of things he did not understand—What attains your end, and that the King and you may ever be
together, would consider as fit to present the King—If
it was "a Grievance," possibly the condition of the thing
was no Grievance when first raised, and the face of things
[may be] now changed, and the use of those people not the
same—The Hollanders may think any thing "a Grievance"
done against them here—If there be not an intention of
"a Standing army," which we know not, it is too hasty
a Vote—Would not have any distrust betwixt the King
and us, and would give no argument to the King to apprehend it—Present only "an army now in being and no
occasion for it;" lay only your duty before his Majesty,
"that it may be a terror to the people, as you apprehend," and tread in the easiest steps to him.
Sir Henry Capel.] You have been told how difficult it
is for armies and properties to stand together—Is not of
that opinion that they are a security to us at home;
knows nothing of affairs at abroad—Our security is the
militia; that will defend us and never conquer us—Our
defence abroad is our ships, the seaman's pay, and peas, and
his coarse diet, well given him—Moves to vote this army
"a Grievance." Is indifferent whether the army be disbanded now, or after the War—Abroad they are of little use, and at home wholly useless—Therefore would
have it "a Grievance."
Lord St. John.] In the former King's time, a much
less thing than this was voted "a Grievance;" and now
an army in our bowels all this summer and no employment for them, and for the county he serves, [Hampshire]
he is particularly obliged to represent it as "a Grievance."
Sir Thomas Clarges.] Howard began his discourse with
a reflection upon him, "as meddling in a business he
did not understand." If what he said of donatives of
four hundred thousand pounds since May last, gave him
the occasion, he is ready to prove it by several warrants,
if required—At the Restoration of the King, after that
army (which was once against him) was disbanded, the
King did raise some men to be kept in pay till men's
judgments were quieted; but now so many new-raised
forces, with their consequences and their demeanours,
are such, that it is "a great Grievance"—Will not say it
is fit now to disband them all; but at the conclusion
of the last War some were made standing regiments, and
fears now, after the War, it will be the same again—But
the King is not minded of his promises by those that
should do it; he is persuaded that the King would do
it, but forgets it—But the raising money, and fifteen or
sixteen to quarter in a poor alehouse, full of children, is
"a Grievance;" and those regiments that did this, the
Scotch and Irish regiments, would have them, however,
disbanded.
Mr Harwood.] The King has many things laid
upon him that he has not done—The King raised not
these men but his Counsellors, who have got by these
things—How many Addresses against Popery, and yet
Papists put into command! He that commands our
men in chief is a stranger (fn. 3) , and he next in command a
Papist (fn. 4) —Cannot wonder at those persons that have
spoke against these things as "Grievances." Were he as
they, possibly he should say so too; but they cannot
think so—We are come to that pass, that no Law can
restrain these people; houses taken from us, our lives in
danger; he cannot say one has suffered death by them,
but some have been soundly swinged—Would vote it a
"Grievance."
Sir Robert Carr.] No man can say, that a Standing
army, in a time of peace, was ever attempted—Most of
the forces were about Norfolk and Suffolk, where the
Dutch have attempted landing—Your Addresses formerly were "to disband them, when the war should be
ended," and will you now do it "the war in being?" It
is not for your service—Some persons gave this six-pence
a day to the soldiers, by their own choice, to avoid
quartering—The articles, mentioned, are only to keep
them in order—If you will make an Address to the King,
and not a Grievance till redressed, he is not against it.
Sir Richard Temple.] The practice of these men is "a
Grievance"—He knows no Law that can empower them
to raise money; the continuance of them will be more
"a Grievance," and what is an oppression, is "a
Grievance"—Would have it voted only, "that the billetting and continuance of them is a Grievance," but not
"the raising them."
Sir Nicholas Carew.] These new-raised forces are but
raw men; the Militia is full as serviceable.
Mr Powle.] Answers Mr Secretary Coventry—Whatever body of men are raised for no use, are "a Grievance;" he thinks "the raising them a Grievance"—These forces were not raised for the war, but the war
made for raising these people—He is no soldier, but has
conversed with such as are, and they hold a descent into
Zealand impossible; for the enemy might, at any time,
get betwixt them and the land with their fleet, and, if
landed, hinder recruits—They are glad that the Militia
may be useless, and the Gentlemen that serve in it are put
upon chargeable employments, but in Chatham business
were not thought fit to command them; which has been
such a discouragement, that many have laid down their commissions: When money or honour [was] to be got, then
they were put out of command—As for the fleet, we are in
a naval war, at least we are told so, and hopes it so, but the
money is all spent upon land soldiers—You know that
in your (fn. 5) Office, the seamen are not paid; the money being
diverted to pay those landmen. Part of those men are drawn
out of Ireland, and the Papists, last Session, were grown
formidable there—Why are they not sent back thither?
We desire them not here, and they want them there—Our Laws to be thus awed! The Law of England will
protect the King—Knows not what these men will do;
but the veteran bands, at last, chopped, and changed,
and sold the Roman Empire—The King himself may be
no longer King, but at the choice of this army—Let
the soldiers be paid, and you may have them again
when you will—Quartering of soldiers, or buying them
off, is an intolerable oppression—Why should an Alehouse-keeper, a subject, buy off his oppressions? Soldiers
to present their muskets in the face of a Court! Would
have it voted "a Grievance."
Colonel Kirby.] Hears it said, "that these men were
raised to no purpose." Had you not had landmen, you
would have had none to man your guns, and they would
have been much put to it; but for our regiment, you
might have had no fleet—Before you move the King for
disbanding, consider how you will maintain the war.
Colonel Birch.] Kirby has given you the greatest
reason imaginable for disbanding these men; he calls the
men aboard a ship, "our regiment;" and he commands
none of the new-raised men—He has ever told you, that
this war was against the grain of the people, and then
against their interest, and we were prorogued on, till the
war was so far entered into, that we could not come out of it
—No people can be governed but by perfect love, or
perfect fear—We are asked, "why this army is a
Grievance now, and not when we were here last?"—We saw not then what we see now. He saw them at
Blackheath with their swords drawn; it terrified him
then, but, thank God, he is pretty well recovered since
he came into the House—If this vote makes the Dutch
insolent, "giving Money" will be the consequence, and
then all is well—The great River of Babylon was cut into
small rivulets, and that destroyed the City, when nothing
else could; so has our Money been diverted, he fears—Would have the Standing Army voted "a Grievance."
Resolved, That the Standing Army is a Grievance.
Sir Thomas Meres.] Moves that some Gentlemen may
draw [up] an Address to the King, showing "in what
manner" this army is "a Grievance."
[A Committee was appointed accordingly.]
[In the afternoon Mr Speaker reports, That, in pursuance
of their commands, he had read, and presented to his Majesty,
the Address of the House, concerning his Royal Highness's
Match with the Princess of Modena; and that his Majesty was
pleased to declare, "That it was a matter that he would take into
his present consideration, and return a speedy Answer."]
Tuesday, November 4.
After the Speaker, who came not to the House till ten of the
clock, though the House was the day before adjourned to eight,
had been called to the Chair by a great voice, he at last took the
Chair; and then Sir Robert Thomas moved to take into consideration the business of "evil Counsellors, as "a Grievance,"
hinted the other day, and would name one, "the Duke of Lauderdale (fn. 6) ." The word was no sooner out of his mouth, but
the [Usher of the] Black Rod knocked at the door, and the
Serjeant gave notice of it to the Speaker, who forbade Sir Robert
proceeding any farther (fn. 7) .
[The King, in a short Speech, informed them of "his intentions to make a short recess, that all good men might recollect themselves;" and added, "and consider whether the present
posture of affairs would not rather require their application to
matters of Religion, and support against our only competitors
at sea, than to things of less importance."]
The Parliament was then prorogued by his Majesty to