November 1586
On Friday the 4th day of November the Lords
Spiritual and Temporal being Assembled, the
Lord Chancellor continued the Parliament unto
the next day at eight of the Clock.
On Saturday the 5th day of November the Lord
Chancellor declared unto the Lords the foul and
indirect dealings practised by the Queen of Scots
against her Majesty and the whole Realm, notwithstanding so many great benefits and favours
which the said Queen of Scots had received of her
Majesty; the which matter by William Lord Burleigh Lord Treasurer of England, as one unto whom
the said Queen of Scots whole proceedings were
better known by reason of his long Service done
unto our most gracious Soveraign Lady since the
beginning of her Reign, were more fully dilated.
Dominus Cancellarius continuavit præsens Parliamentum usq; in diem Lunæ horâ octavâ.
On Monday the 7th day of November while
the Lords were debating the matter of the Queen
of Scots, the House of Commons came up and
desired a Conference with some of the Lords of
this House, what number it should please them
to appoint, about the great matter of the Queen
of Scots already opened unto them. Whereupon the Lords chose out to the number of twenty
one, viz. the Archbishops of Canterbury and
York, the Lord Treasurer, the Lord Steward,
the Earl of Northumberland, the Earl of Kent,
the Earl of Rutland and the Earl of Sussex: the
Bishop of London, the Bishop of Durham, the
Bishop of Winchester and the Bishop of Worcester;
the Lord Admiral, the Lord Chamberlain, the
Lord Cobham, the Lord Grey, the Lord Lumley,
the Lord Shandois, the Lord Buckhurst, the Lord
de la Ware and the Lord Norris.
Dominus Cancellarius continuavit præsens Parliamentum usq; in diem crastinum horâ nonâ.
On Tuesday the 8th day of November nothing
was done, but the Parliament was by the Lord
Chancellor continued usq; in diem crastinum horâ
nonâ.
On Wednesday the 9th day of November were
read divers Letters as well of Anthony Babington
to the Queen of Scots, as of the said Queen of
Scots to the said Anthony Babington, Charles Paget and others.
The Sentence also pronounced by the Commissioners against the Queen of Scots was read.
A form of a Petition agreed upon by the Committees of both Houses was read.
Dominus Cancellarius continuavit præsens Parliamentum usq; in diem crastinum horâ nonâ.
On Thursday the 10th day of November the
Lords Committees made report unto the whole
House, that they of the House of Commons upon hearing the Sentence and divers of the special
Evidences and Proofs whereupon the Sentence
was grounded, openly read unto them, after
long deliberation and consultation had betwixt
them both publickly and privately, they all with
one assent allowed the same Sentence to be just,
true and honourable, and that they humbly desired their Lordships to make choice of such
number of Lords as their Lordships should think
meet, to joyn with them in Petition to her Majesty. Whereupon their Lordships made choice
of the said Lords following, viz. the Lord Chancellor, the Lord Treasurer, the Lord High Chamberlain, the Lord Steward, the Earl of Northumberland, the Earl of Kent, the Earl of Rutland,
the Earl of Sussex, the Earl of Pembroke and the
Earl of Hartford, the Lord Chamberlain, the
Lord Abergavenny, the Lord Zouch, the Lord
Morley, the Lord Cobham, the Lord Grey, the
Lord Lumley, the Lord de la Ware and the Lord
Norris.
Memorandum, That the Commons House made
request to have the Petition assented unto by
both the Houses to be inrolled in the Parliament
Roll, the which the Lords thought better to
defer until her Majesties liking or misliking were
first had of the same.
Dominus Cancellarius adjournavit præsens Parliamentum usq; in diem Martis prox. horâ nonâ.
On Tuesday the 15th day of November the Lord
Chancellor declared unto the whole House the
order of proceeding of Committees in presenting
the Petition unto her Highness, and that her
Majesties Answer was in so eloquent and goodly
sort, and with words so well placed, that he
would not take upon him to report it as it was
uttered by her Majesty, but that the effect was,
that her Highness highly thanked her so dutiful
and loving Subjects for their great care and tender zeal that they shewed to have of her safety;
and were it not in respect of them and of the
state of the Realm and maintenance of the true
Religion, she would not ...... And that her
Highness did well know the greatness of the peril and the dangerous practice attempted against
her Person, and that her Majesty did acknowledge it to be the maintaining and defending
hand of him that hath delivered her so often,
and from so great perils. Her Highness concluded, it was a Cause of great moment, and required good deliberation, and that she could
not presently give Answer unto them, but that
her Highness would shortly deliver it to some of
her Privy Council, which should declare unto
them her Highnesses mind. And thus her Highness answered.
This day further the Lord Chancellor signified unto the Lords, that on Monday her Majesty commanded him to require the Lords to
advise amongst them, if some other course might
be taken without proceeding to the extremity
of Execution, which her Highness could better
like of, if any such might be found, and that
her Highness looked for Answer from their Lordships.
Nota, That the whole entrance of this days
business, viz. the Lord Chancellors Report of
the Queens Answer, is crossed in the Original
Journal-Book, but remaineth as legible as any
other part, except a few interlined words; but
by the whole course following, that ought to
stand which is crossed, for without that the business following hath no coherence with the premisses.
Dominus Cancellarius adjournavit præsens Parliamentum usq; in diem Sabbati prox, horâ consuetâ.
Die Sabbati 19 Die Novembris Dominus Cancellarius continuavit præsens Parliamentum usq;
in diem Martis prox. horâ nonâ.
On Tuesday the 22d day of November after
many Speeches which tended all to one effect,
which was, that their Lordships in their opinions
could not find any other way than was already
set down in their Petition: then the Lords agreed
that the matter should be put to the question;
and being particularly asked every one his several voice, answered with one Consent, that they
could find no other way.
The House of Commons came up, and desired the Lords to be content to appoint some of
the Lords to confer with them upon the Answer
that was to be made to her Highness, and to deliver the same to her Majesty. Whereupon the
Lords made choice of these Lords following, viz.
the Archbishops of Canterbury and York, the
Lord Treasurer, &c.
And the said Lords upon Conference had
with the Committee of the Lower House made
report, that the like question was propounded
to them of the House of Commons, and that
they Answered all with one consent, no man
gainsaying, that they could find none other
way. Whereupon the said Committees of both
Houses agreed upon this Answer to be made to
her Majesty, That having often conferred and
debated of that question according to her Highness Commandment, they could find none other
way than was set down in the Petition. Which
Answer for the Lords was delivered unto her
Majesty by the Lord Chancellor, and for the
Commons by their Speaker at Richmond on
Thursday the 24th day of November.
Dominus Cancellarius continuavit præsens Parliamentum usque in diem Vcneris prox. horâ
nonâ.
On Friday the 25th day of November the Lord
Chancellor delivered her Majesties Answer to
the Lords to the last resolution; the Effect
whereof was as followeth, viz.
If (said her Highness) I should say unto you
that I mean not to grant your Petition, by my
faith I should say unto you more than perhaps
I mean. And if I should say unto you that I
mean to grant your Petition, I should then tell
you more than is sit for you to know. And thus
I must deliver you an Answer Answerless.
Whereas on the 7th day of this instant Month
of November whilst the Lords were in Consultation about the great matter of the Queen of
Scots, the Chief and only Cause of the Summons of this Parliament, they of the House of
Commons came up and desired Conference with
some of the Lords of this House, what number
it should please their Lordships to appoint touching the said great cause, which, as they affirmed,
had been opened and declared unto them:
Whereupon the Lords made choice of divers
Lords (whose names see at large on Munday the
7th day of this instant Month of November foregoing) And to attend the said Lords were appointed the Lord Chief Justice of the Common-Pleas, the Lord Chief Baron and Justice
Gawdic, the time and place of their meeting being in the very Parliament Chamber at two of
the Clock in the Afternoon; and after often
meeting and long Conferences had, they agreed
upon a form of Petition, which by both the
Houses should be presented unto her Majesty.
And that Choice should be made of a certain
number of either House to prefer the same unto
her Highness. Which being reported to this
House, the Lords liked very well thereof; And
thereupon made Choice of divers Lords, whose
names see at large on Thursday the 10th day of
this instant November foregoing.
And they of the House of Commons appointed their Speaker and all the Privy-Council of
that House, and so many others as in all with
the Privy-Council made up the Number of 42.
Persons, to join with the said Lords.
And they altogether understanding first her
Majesties pleasure for the time of their repair to
her Highness presence, (which was signified to
be on Saturday the 12th day of November,) the
Lord Chancellor in the name of the Lords, and
the Speaker in the name of the House of Commons declared unto her Majesty, That both the
Lords and Commons after often Conferences
and long consultation had, concluded to be humble suitors unto her Majesty by way of Petition; the effect whereof was then at good length
opened unto her Majesty by the Lord Chancellor and Speaker, and the Petition thereupon delivered unto her Majesty in writing. And
where it was before desired by them of the said
House of Commons, that presently upon the
Agreement of the Form of the Petition it might
be entered into the Rolls of the Parliament,
the Lords thought it better to stay the enterance thereof until it were presented unto her
Highness; which done, the Lords ordered that
this Friday the 25th day of November the said
Petition should be entered into the Parliament
Roll in manner and form following, viz.
May it please your most Excellent Majesty,
Our must Gracious Soveraign. We your humble, loving and faithful Subjects, the Lords and
Commons in this present Parliament assembled,
having of long time to our intolerable grief
seen by how manifold most dangerous and execrable practices Mary the Daughter and Heir of
James the Fifth late King of Scots Dowager of
France and commonly called Queen of Scots,
hath compassed the destruction of your Majesties
sacred and most Royal Person, in whose safety
(next under God) our chief and only felicity
doth consist, and thereby not only to bereave
us of the sincere and true Religion of Almighty
God, bringing us and this Noble Crown back
again into the Thraldom of the Romish Tyranny,
but also utterly to ruinate and overthrow the
happy State and Common Weal of this most
Noble Realm; which being from time to time
by the great mercy and providence of God, and
your Highness singular wisdom foreseen and prevented, your Majesty of your exceeding great
Clemency and Princely Magnanimity hath either
most graciously passed over, or with singular favour tolerated, (although often and instantly
moved by your most loving and faithful Subjects
to the contrary in times of your Parliaments,
and at many other times; and hath also protected and defended the said Scottish Queen from
those great dangers which her own people for
certain detestable Crimes and offences to her imputed, had determined against her. All which
notwithstanding, the same Queen was nothing
moved with these and many other your Majesties
most gracious favours towards her; but rather
obdurate in malice, and by hope of continual
impunity imboldened to prosecute her cruel and
mischievous determination by some speedy and
violent course, and now lately a very dangerous
Plot being conceived and set down by Anthony
Babington and others, That six desperate and
wicked persons should undertake that wicked
and most horrible enterprize to take away your
Majesties Life (whom God of his infinite mercy
long preserve) she did not only give her advice
and direction upon every point, and all circumstances concerning the same make earnest request
to have it performed with all diligence, but did
also promise assurance of large reward and recompence to the doers thereof; which being informed to your Majesty, it pleased your Highness upon the earnest Suit of such as tendred the
safety of your Royal Person, and the good and
quiet state of this Realm, to direct your Commission under the Great Seal of England to the
Lords and others of your Highness Privy-Council, and certain other Lords of Parliament of the
greatest and most antient Degree, with some of
your principal Judges, to examine, hear and
determine the same Cause, and thereupon to give
Sentence or Judgment according to a Statute in
that behalf made in the twenty seventh year of
your most Gracious Reign : By vertue whereof
the more part of the same Commissioners being
in number thirty six, having at sundry times fully
heard what was alledged and proved against the
said Scottish Queen in her own presence touching
the said crimes and offences, and what she could
say for her defence and excuse therein, did after
long deliberation give their Sentence and Judgment with one consent, that the death and destruction of your Royal Person was imagined
and compassed by the said Anthony Babington
with the privity of the same Scottish Queen; And
that she her self did also compass and imagine
the death and destruction of your most Royal
Person. Now for as much as we your Majesties
most humble, loyal and dutiful Subjects representing unto your most Excellent Majesty the
universal State of your whole people of all degrees in this your Realm, do well perceive and
are fully satisfied, that the same Sentence and
Judgment is in all things most honourable, just
and lawful; And having carefully and effectually
according to our most bounden duties weighed
and considered upon what ground and cause so
many Traiterous complots and dangerous practices against your most Royal Person and Estate,
and for the invading of this Realm have for the
space of many years past grown and proceeded,
do certainly find and are undoubtedly perswaded that all the same have been from time to
time attempted and practised by and from the
Scottish Queen, and by her Consederates, Ministers and Favourers, who conceive an assured
hope to atchieve speedily by your Majesties untimely death that which they have long expected, and whereof during your Life (which God
long preserve to our inestimable Comfort) they
despair, to wit, to place her the said Scottish
Queen in the Imperial and Kingly Seat of this
Realm, and by her to banish and destroy the
Professors and professing of the true Religion of
Jesus Christ, and the antient Nobility of this
Land, and to bring this whole State and Common-Weal to Foreign Subjection and utter ruin
and confusion; which their malicious and traiterous purpose they will never cease to prosecute
by all possible means they can, so long as they
may have their Eyes and Imaginations fixed upon
that Lady the only ground of their treasonable
hope and conceits, and the only Seed-plot of all
dangerous and traiterous devices and practices
against your Sacred Person. And seeing also
what insolent boldness is grown in the heart of
the same Queen through your Majesties former
exceeding favours and Clemencies towards her,
and thereupon weighing with heavy and forrowful hearts in what continual peril of such like
desperate Conspiracies and practices your Majesties most Royal and Sacred Person and Life
(more dear unto us than our own) is and shall
be still, without any possible means to prevent
it, so long as the said Scottish Queen shall be suffered to continue, and shall not receive that due
punishment which by Justice and the Laws of this
your Realm she hath so often and so many ways
for her most wicked and detestable offences deserved; Therefore, and for that we find that if
the said Lady shall now escape the due and deserved punishment of Death for these her most
execrable Treasons and offences, your Highness
Royal Person shall be exposed unto many more
and those more secret and dangerous Conspiracies than before, and such as shall not or cannot
be foreseen or discovered as these her late attempts have been, and shall not hereafter be so
well able to remove or take away the ground
and occasion of the same as now by Justice may
and ought to be done; We do most humbly
beseech your most Excellent Majesty, that as well
in respect of the continuance of the true Religion
now professed amongst us, and of the safety of
your most Royal Person and Estate, as in regard
of the preservation and defence of us your most
loving, dutiful and faithful Subjects, and the
whole Common-Weal of this Realm, It may
please your Highness to take speedy Order, That
Declaration of the same Sentence and Judgment
be made and published by Proclamation, and
that thereupon direction be given for further
proceedings against the said Scottish Queen according to the effect and true meaning of the said
Statute : Because upon advised and great consultation we cannot find that there is any possible means to provide for your Majesties Safety,
but by the just and speedy Execution of the said
Queen, the neglecting whereof may procure the
heavy displeasure and punishment of Almighty
God, as by sundry severe Examples of his great
Justice in that behalf left us in the Sacred Scriptures doth appear. And if the same be not put
in present Execution, We your most loving and
dutiful Subjects shall thereby (so far as mans reason can reach) be brought into utter despair of
the continuance amongst us of the true Religion
of Almighty God, and of your Majesties Life,
and the Safety of all your faithful Subjects, and
the good Estate of this most flourishing Common-Weal.
Dominus Cancellarius continuavit præsens Parliamentum usq; in diem Martis prox.
On Tuesday the 29th day of November, the
Lords Spiritual and Temporal being Assembled,
Commissionar' Reginæ continuaverunt præsens Parliamentum usq; in diem Veneris hor â nonâ.
On Friday the second day of December Commissionarii Reginæ adjornaverunt præsens Parliamentum usq; in decimum quintum diem Februarii
prox.
Nota, That the Parliament was Adjourned
without any new Commission from her Majesty
which had been used in the last Parliament, in
Anno 27 Regin. Eliz. Anno Dom. 1584. where
the Adjournment was from the 27th day of December unto the 4th day of February, which was
near upon the same intervenient time or space
for which this present Parliament de Anno 28, &
29 Regin. Eliz. was now Adjourned.
But the reason and cause is very plain why
this Parliament was now Adjourned without any
such Commission from her Majesty, although she
her self was absent, and this was only in respect
that her Highness Person was represented by
Commissioners, to whom at first she had by Commission under the Great Seal delegated full and
absolute power not only to begin but also to
continue, Adjourn or Prorogue this instant Parliament (ut vide on Saturday the 29th day of
October foregoing) which said Delegates or Lords
Lieutenants did here being present Adjourn the
same accordingly.
Concerning which said Adjournment and
these two Meetings of one and the same Parliament there hath been much mistake and difference both in the Original Journal-Book of the
Upper House, and in that also of the House of
Commons, in the very Rolls of the Statute of
this Parliament transcribed by the Clerk of the
Upper House into the Chancery, and remaining
in the Chappel of the Rolls, and lastly in the
very Printed Books of the Statutes thereof.
For in the first place Mr Anthony Mason at this
time Clerk of the Upper House, Entereth these
two meetings of this one and the same Parliament in two several Books, as if they had been
two several Sessions; to which mistake he was
the rather induced, because divers Lords did send
their new Proxies upon the second meeting of
the two Houses on Wednesday the 15th day of
February, & Anno Regin. Eliz. whereas it doth
not appear that in the last Parliament de Anno
27 Regin. Eliz. that any new Proxies were then
returned upon the second meeting of the two
Houses after a like Adjournment. But the reason
of this seemeth to be, not only in respect of this
Adjournment, that it was somewhat longer than
that former in the twenty seventh year of her
Majesty (which lasted not full two Months,
whereas this present Adjournment continued for
the space of seventy five days or two Months and
a Fortnight at the least.) But also because divers
of the Lords both Spiritual and Temporal, who
were present at this first meeting, being desirous
(as it should seem) to hear that great business
of the Scottish Queen debated and resolved on,
did after this Adjournment and their recesses into their several Countries get Licence of her Majesty to be absent from the second meeting of
this Parliament, which ensued on Wednesday the
15th day of February following in Anno 29 Regin.
Eliz. and in which there were none but ordinary
matters likely to be handled (Execution and Justice being done upon the Scottish Queen the 8th
day of February immediately preceding the said
second meeting) and did thereupon send their
several Proxies of which such as were unusual
and extraordinary are set down in the Journal
ensuing according to the several days on which
they were returned.
In the second place touching the Original
Journal-Book of the House of Commons these
two meetings of one and the same Parliament are
set down as two several Sessions, the one by Mr
Fulk Onslow at this time Clerk of the House of
Commons, and the other by Mr William Onslow
his Kinsman, who being a Member of the House
was Licenced by it to supply the place of the said
Mr Fulk Onslow, who by reason of his sickness
was not able to attend, who enters this second
meeting of the House of Commons upon Wednesday the 15th day of February in these words,
viz.
This present Session of Parliament holden by
Prorogation, &c.
Whereas it had not been Prorogued but Adjourned, and was no new Session but meerly a
new meeting.
In the third place the Roll of Statutes transcribed by Mr Anthony Mason into the Chancery
and remaining in he Chappel of the Rolls, is intituled as followeth, Rotulus Parliament de Anno
Regni Regin Elizabeth. vicesimo octavo. Whereas
the words should likewise have been added, viz.
& vicesimo nono.
In the fourth and last place the Printed Books
of Statutes are likewise mistaken; for Christopher
Barker at this time Printer to the Queens Majesty, who Printed the Statutes of this Parliament at large in Anno 1587. maketh no mention
of any Parliament or meeting of Parliament in
Anno 28 Regin. Eliz. but mentioneth that Book
of Statutes in this manner, Anno 29° Regin Eliz.
at this present Session of Parliament holden
by Prorogation at Westminster the 15th day
of February in the 29th year of the Raign of
our most gracious Soveraign Lady Elizabeth, &c.
Whereas if he had intituled it truly, it should
have been thus: At this present Parliament holden at Westminster the 29th day of October in the
28th and 29th years of the Raign of our most
Gracious Soveraign Lady Elizabeth, &c. Mr
Poulton also in his Abridgement of Statutes
Printed by the Company of Stationers, Anno
Dom. 1612. setteth down a false Title before the
Statutes of this Parliament, viz. Statutes made
at the Session of Parliament holden by Prorogation at Westminster the 29th day of October, Anno
28 Eliz. and Anno Dom. 1587. &c.
In which said Title there are these two notorious and gross mistakes: The first in that he saith
this Parliament was holden by Prorogation,
whereas the former Parliament, held in Anno
27° Regin. Eliz. being dissolved upon the 14th
day of September in Anno 28 Regin. ejusdem, this
Parliament begun and held in the said 28th and
29th years of her Majesty was newly Summoned,
and not held by Prorogation.
His second mistake is more gross than this, in
that he allots all these proceedings to the year
of our Lord 1587. whereas both meetings did
begin and end during the year 1586. reckoning
the year to begin upon the 25th day of March,
as in all the Journal-Books of Parliaments and
the Printed Books of Statutes and all Records
and private Instruments it is always observed.
All which may show how great inconvenience
it may bring to take up things upon trust from
others without searching out the truth, seeing so
many men in that which they were best skilled
in, and had doubtless so industriously travelled
in, yet should be so grosly mistaken; for it is
not worth the proof that this was an Adjournment and not a Prorogation, seeing it is positively entred in the Original Journal-Book of the
Upper House on Friday the second day of December foregoing. And likewise when the two
Houses did meet again on Wednesday the 15th
day of February following, the foresaid JournalBook beginneth thus:
Die Mercurii 15° die Februarii Domini tam
Spirituales quàm Temporales, quorum nomina subsequntur, præsentes fuerunt.
Whereas if that meeting had been a new Session, the Entrance ought to have been thus:
viz.
Die Mercurii 15° die Februarii, in quem diem
hoc præsens Parliamentum Prorogatum fuerat, Proceres tam Spirituales quàm Temporales, &c. Or
thus: viz. In quem diem, &c. Sessio Parliamenti
Prorogata fuit teneri & inchoari apud Westminster
die & loco prædict. Domini tam Spiritual. quàm
Temporal. quorum nomina Subscribuntur, præsentes
fuerunt, &c.
To which also may lastly be added, that no
Bill passing the two Houses in the first meeting
of this Parliament, nay for ought that can be
gathered out of the Original Journal-Book of
the Upper House, no one Bill having so much
as any reading there, as hath been before observed, and so no Royal Assent putting life into any
one Law, it could not be a Session but a meer
meeting, which continued from Saturday the
29th of October unto Friday the second day of
December in Annis 28, & 29. Regin Eliz. Anno
Dom. 1586.
This doubt being thus fully cleared and the
mistakings upon which it grew being likewise
discovered, the residue of the Journal of this
present Parliament upon the second meeting of
the two Houses next ensueth.