CHAPTER XV.
SOMERSET HOUSE AND KING'S COLLEGE.
"Before my gate a street's broad channel goes,
Which still with waves of crowding people flows;
And every day there passes by my side,
Up to its western reach, the London tide,
The spring-time of the term. My front looks down
On all the pride and business of the town."—Cowley.
Old Somerset House—Rapacity of the Protector Somerset—John of Padua, Architect of the Original Building—Downfall and Execution of the
Protector—Somerset House assigned to the Princess Elizabeth—Afterwards the Residence of the Queens of England—Its Name changed
to Denmark House—Additions made by Inigo Jones—Banishment of the Capuchin Fathers, and Desecration of the Chapel—The Services
in the Chapel restored, and Pepys' Account of them—Catherine of Braganza—Attempt to implicate the Royal Household with the
Murder of Sir Edmundbury Godfrey—The Cemetery—Description of the Old Buildings—Their Demolition—Building of New Somerset
House—Amusing Tradition relative to Somerset House—King's College.
The building so familiar to Londoners, old and
young, by the name of Somerset House, occupies
the space formerly covered by four or five buildings of note in their day, of some of which we
have already spoken. It appears from Stow that
in order to make a level space of ground to hold
the fair new palace which he purposed to erect—"that large and goodly house now called Somerset
House"—the Protector Somerset pulled down, and
"without any recompense," the Inns, as they were
called, of the Bishops of Chester, Llandaff, Lichfield and Coventry, and Worcester, with all the
tenements adjoining, and also the old parish church
of St. Mary's.
The original Somerset House, it is almost needless to remark, took its name from the Duke of
Somerset, the Lord Protector of the reign of the
boy-king, Edward VI.; but the present building is
of much more recent date. By the attainder of
Somerset it reverted to the Crown, and it was
frequently tenanted by Queen Elizabeth. Anne of
Denmark, the wife of James I., and Catherine of
Braganza, the neglected queen of Charles II., both
in succession held their courts within its walls.
At length it came to be appropriated by usage as
a residence to the queens-dowager, and was frequently appointed as a temporary residence for
such of the ambassadors of foreign princes as the
later Stuarts and the earlier Brunswick sovereigns
cared especially to honour.
Mr. A. Wood, in his "Ecclesiastical Antiquities
of London and its Suburbs," is of opinion that the
Protector Somerset already possessed some property on the site of Somerset House when he
began the great work of pulling down his neighbours' houses around their ears and his own. But
be this true or not, he seems to have known, or at
all events to have made, little distinction between
meum and tuum, and when he had once resolved
on his end—namely, to build a palace on this
central site, at a bend commanding the view of the
river from London Bridge to the Abbey at Westminster—he was not likely to be at much loss as
to the means to be employed. Wide space and
materials were all that he needed, and these he
soon obtained in a manner such as we should now
probably distinguish by the term "by hook or by
crook." And further, in order to complete the
undertaking in a thoroughly substantial and, as it
would now be called, "first-class" style, he pulled
down also the charnel-house of Old St. Paul's
and the chapel over it, together with a structure
in "Pardon Churchyard, near the Charterhouse,
throwing the dead into Finsbury Fields," and the
steeple, tower, and part of the church of the Priory
of St. John of Jerusalem at Clerkenwell. With
these materials he commenced his work, unblessed
by either the Church, or the people, or the poor.
Bishop Burnet, alluding to the Protector's rapacity, admits that "many bishops and cathedrals
had resigned many manors to him for obtaining
his favour," though he adds, "this was not done
without leave obtained from the king." He also
accuses the Protector of selling chantry lands to
his friends at easy rates, for which it was concluded
he had great presents. The rise of Somerset
House exposed its owner to the reflection that
"when the king was engaged in such wars, and
when London was much disordered by the plague
that had been in it for some months, he was then
bringing architects from Italy, and designing such
a palace as had not been seen in England."
Pennant tells us that the architect employed by
the Protector Somerset in the erection of Somerset
House was the celebrated John of Padua, the
architect of Longleat, in Wiltshire, who is said, in
Walpole's "Anecdotes of Painting," to have held,
under Henry VIII., the post of "Devizer of His
Majesty's Buildings."
Whether the Protector Somerset ever resided in
the palace he had thus been at so much trouble in
building, there is some room to doubt. The building itself was commenced in 1546–7, and as soon
after as the month of October, 1548, at which time
the works were still going on, he was deprived of
the Protectorship and committed to the Tower.
He was, however, pardoned after two years' imprisonment, and restored to the Council; but in
the following year he was again committed to the
Tower on charges of high treason, and was beheaded on Tower Hill in January, 1552. One of
the grounds of dissatisfaction at first exhibited
against him appears to have been "his ambition
and seeking of his own glory, as appeared by his
building of most sumptuous and costly buildings,
and specially in the time of the king's wars, and
the king's soldiers unpaid." On the attainder of
the Duke of Somerset his palace was, of course,
forfeited to the Crown, and his nephew, King
Edward, appears to have assigned it to his sister,
the Princess Elizabeth, for her use whenever she
visited her sister's court. But when she came to
the throne, she preferred the regions of Whitehall
and St. James's, and fashion followed in the wake
of royalty westwards. At this period the building
is spoken of as "Somerset Place, beyond Strand
Bridge." On Elizabeth's succession to the throne
some partial restoration of Somerset's property was
probably made, for Somerset Place became the
residence of the Dowager Duchess.

SOMERSET HOUSE AND STAIRS. (As they appeared before they were pulled down in 1776.)
Elizabeth seems to have lived here occasionally,
most probably, however, at the expense of her
kinsman, Lord Hunsdon, to whom she had given
the use of it. Such, at all events, was the opinion
of Pennant.
Stow tells us that the queen of James I. made
this house her palace, and that she entertained
the king with a feast within its walls on Shrove
Tuesday, 1616, when the latter was so delighted
at her reception of him that he ordered it to be
called Denmark House in her honour. The palace
was much improved and beautified by the queen,
who added much to it in the way of new buildings, Inigo Jones being called in to furnish the
designs. She also brought a supply of water to it
by pipes laid on from Hyde Park. In 1626 it
was settled for life on Henrietta Maria, the queen
of Charles I., for whom it had been stipulated on
her marriage that she should be allowed the free
practice of her religion, having been born and
brought up a pious Catholic. Accordingly it was
fitted up for the reception of herself and her household, including, of course, a body of priests to say
mass daily, and to celebrate the offices of the
Church. The priests in attendance on the queen
were Capuchins. They had succeeded to the
Oratorians, who had been expelled by the influence
of Buckingham (Steenie) with his royal master.
The foundation-stone of the chapel was laid by
the queen, the work being carried out under the
direction of Inigo Jones. The first stone was laid
with great ceremony. From six in the morning
there was a succession of masses daily till nearly
noon, and as it was difficult to approach the sacraments elsewhere, except clandestinely, the confessionals were thronged constantly. On Sundays
and festivals there was a controversial lecture at
noon, and soon after followed vespers, sung by the
Capuchins and musicians in the galleries. When
vespers were over, there was a sermon on the
gospel of the day, and lastly, compline. The
chapel seems to have been also turned to account
constantly in other ways. There were frequent
"conferences" for the edification of Catholics and
the instruction of Protestants, and on three days in
each week the Christian doctrine was taught catechetically in English and in French. The consequence was that there were frequent conversions
to the ancient faith, and the name of the chapel
began to offend the ruling powers. Accordingly,
when the queen was absent in Holland, it was resolved by the authorities to make an assault upon
the place. The Capuchin fathers were silenced
and driven out, then imprisoned, and at length
banished; their dwelling itself was pulled down,
and the chapel desecrated, in spite of its being the
property of the queen. The Capuchins were
brought back, and the chapel was repaired, when
Henrietta Maria returned to England, a widowed
queen, after her son's restoration.

THE SAVOY. (From a Drawing by J. P. Ncale, published in 1815.)
Here, in September, 1660, died the Duke of
Gloucester, from the small-pox; and hence his
body was taken by water "down Somerset Stairs,"
as Pepys tells us, to Westminster, to be buried in
the Abbey.
Pepys, in his "Diary," gives an account of a
service held in the chapel of Somerset House in
1663–4. "On the 24th, being Ash Wednesday, to
the Queen's chapel, where I staid and saw mass, till
a man came and bade me go out or kneel down;
so I did go out; and thence to Somerset House,
and there into the chapel, where Mons. D'Espagne,
a Frenchman, used to preach." In October he
again visits Somerset House, and saw the queen's
new rooms, "which are most stately and nobly
furnished!" In January, 1664–5, he went there
again, and was shown the queen's mother's chamber
and closet, "most beautiful places for furniture and
pictures." In consequence, however, of the plague
in the June following, the Court prepared to leave
Whitehall and Somerset House. The Queen went
to France, and there died in 1669. On the death
of Charles II. in 1685, Somerset House became
the residence of Catherine of Braganza, who lived
here until her return to Portugal in 1692. It had
previously belonged to her as Queen Consort, and
during the ultra-Protestant furore, which exhibited
itself for some years prior to the Revolution,
attempts were made to implicate her household in
the pretended Popish Plot of the time, and to
connect the mysterious murder of Sir Edmundbury
Godfrey in 1678 with persons in her service.
There is so much doubt and uncertainty mixed
up with the story of the murder of Sir Edmundbury Godfrey, that it is almost impossible to winnow
the truth from the falsehood, owing to the perjuries
of Titus Oates and his confederate, Bedloe, the
discharged servant of the Lord Belasyse. But it
appears clear that the worthy justice of the peace
was inveigled to a spot close to "the Watergate
at Somerset House," under the pretence of his
presence being wanted to allay a quarrel, and that
he was strangled on the spot with a twisted handkerchief. His dead body, it would seem, was
afterwards carried to Primrose Hill, at that time
a retired and lonely spot, where a sword was run
through it. For their presumed share in this
murder three persons were hung at Tyburn in
1679. An attempt was made by Oates and Bedloe
to implicate the Jesuits in the plot, and even the
Queen, who then resided at Somerset House; but
Charles, with his usual wit, refused to listen to the
charge, telling Burnet that though "she was a weak
woman, and had some disagreeable humours, she
was not capable of a wicked thing."
We have already said that, under the Stuarts,
Somerset House was frequently appointed for the
reception of ambassadors whom the sovereign and
the court delighted to honour. The last foreigner
of importance who lodged there was the Venetian
ambassador, who made a public entry into it in
1763, shortly before the building was pulled down.
From the time of the departure of Catherine of
Braganza, Somerset House ceases to possess any
interest in its strictly palatial character. It continued as an appurtenance of successive queens
down to the year 1775, when Parliament was recommended, in a message from the Crown, to settle
upon Queen Charlotte the house in which she then
resided, "formerly called Buckingham House, but
then known by the name of the Queen's House,"
in which case Somerset House, already settled upon
her, should be given up and appropriated "to such
uses as shall be found most useful to the public."
Mr. Wood, in his "Ecclesiastical Antiquities,"
tells us that in the reign of James II., Dr. Smith,
one of the four vicars-apostolic who acted as
Catholic bishops in England, was consecrated at
Somerset House. There was also in the grounds
of Somerset House a small cemetery, in which the
Catholic members of the Queen's household were
buried. In 1638 Father Richard Blount, who had
"reconciled" Anne of Denmark, the consort or
James I., to the Roman Church, was buried here
by the Queen's permission. The value of such a
permission at that time may be inferred from the
fact that, owing to the severity of the penal laws,
Catholics were for the most part obliged to be
buried in Protestant cemeteries, with rites distasteful to themselves; and they were only too
glad when the priest who attended them in their
last illness could bless a little mould which was
put into their coffin, and perform the usual ceremonies in secret, and even at a distance from their
bodies.
A map and ground-plan of old Somerset, or
Denmark House in 1706, shows that it consisted
of one large and principal quadrangle, called "the
Upper Court," facing the Strand. Its out-buildings
were very extensive, and still more so its terraced
gardens, facing the Thames, with stairs at either
end: In the southern front of the quadrangle
named above were the Guard Chamber, with a
waiting-room, the Privy Chamber, the Presence
Chamber, from the west end of which a flight of
stone steps led down into the garden. On the
western side, from the Strand nearly to the riverside, there ran along Duchy Lane (now absorbed
in Wellington Street South) a row of coach-houses,
stables, and store-yards. To the south-east angle
of the chief quadrangle there was a passage down
the "Back Stairs" to a second, or lower court, two
storeys lower than the upper court. Here were
the more private apartments of the queen—the
"Coffee Room," "Back Stair Room," "Oratory,"
dressing-room, bed-chamber, and "Withdrawing
Room," the two last-named facing the gardens and
commanding a fine view of the reach of the river.
Still further to the east, extending across what now
is part of King's College, as far as Strand Passage,
or Lane, were a variety of other buildings, occupied
by the members of the Court, called the French
Buildings, connected with the Yellow Room, the
Cross Gallery, the Long Gallery, and leading to a
"pleasance" which opened into the garden. A
print in the Gentleman's Magazine, showing some of
these last-named buildings before they were pulled
down, together with the new building of Sir William
Chambers on the north, leads us to suppose that,
though interesting as a specimen of the style of
Edward VI., their removal was no great loss from
an architectural point of view.
The gardens were laid out in the square and
monotonous style of the period, so well described
by Pope—
"Grove nods to grove, each alley has its brother,
And half the garden just reflects the other."
This was literally true here, for in front of both the
greater and the lesser quadrangle there were square
gardens, with straight gravel walks on each side,
and three avenues of trees; a handsome flight of
stone steps, with iron gates; and on either side
some handsome statues of Tritons and Nereids.
Along the river ran a raised terrace, with a heavy
dwarf wall. In a print of the river front of
Somerset House, dated 1706, there appears moored
a little way off the stairs a sort of house-barge,
under which is written "The Folly," and a queershaped wherry, approaching the form of a gondola.
"I am extremely pleased," observes Stow, "with
the front of the first court of Somerset House,
next the Strand, as it affords us a view of the
first dawning of taste in England, this being the
only fabric that I know which deviates from the
Gothic, or imitates the manner of the ancients."
How amused would Pugin or Sir Gilbert Scott be
to read this statement! and also the sentiment
which follows:—"Here are columns, arches, and
cornices that appear to have some meaning; if
proportions are neglected, if beauty is not understood, if there is in it a strange mixture of barbarism and splendour, the mistakes admit of great
alleviations." In all probability the architect was
an Englishman, and this his first attempt to refine
on the work of his predecessors.
It is currently believed that James Stuart, the
elder "Pretender," was at one time secreted in old
Somerset House; and there is an allusion to this
belief in the Town Spy, published in 1725:—"The Pretender's residing at Somerset House in
the year of Peace was blabbed out by one of the
Duke d'Aum—nt's postilions."
The demolition of the old building was commenced as soon as an Act could be passed, and
Sir William Chambers was appointed architect
of the new buildings. They were commenced in
1776, and in 1779 one of the fronts was completed.
The site occupies an area of upwards of 800 feet
by 500. The front towards the Strand consists
of a rustic basement of nine arches, supporting
Corinthian columns, and an attic in the centre,
and a balustrade at each extremity. Emblematic
figures of Ocean and of the eight principal rivers
of England in alto-relievo adorn the keystones of
the arches. Medallions of George III., Queen
Charlotte, and the Prince of Wales were formerly
placed over the three central windows of the first
floor. The attic is divided into separate portions
by statues of Justice, Truth, Valour, and Moderation; and the summit is crowned with the British
arms, supported by emblematical figures of Fame
and the genius of England. The chief feature of
the river front of Somerset House is its broad
terrace, about 600 feet in length, raised on rustic
arches, and ornamented with emblematic figures of
the Thames. The centre of the large quadrangle
opposite the chief entrance from the Strand is
occupied by a gigantic piece of bronze work,
executed by Bacon. The principal figure is a
fanciful and almost allegorical representation of
Father Thames.
The building affords at present accommodation
during the working hours of the day to about 900
Government officials, maintained at an annual cost
of something like £275,000, and belonging to the
Audit Office, the office of the Registrar-General,
and the offices connected with Doctors' Commons.
In the north front the annual exhibition of the
Royal Academy was held from 1780 down to about
the year 1837, when it was transferred to the
National Gallery in Trafalgar Square. The use of
apartments in Somerset House for the meetings of
the society was also granted in 1780. The Royal
Society removed from Somerset House to Burlington House, Piccadilly, in 1856. The Society of
Antiquaries, and also the Royal Astronomical and
the Geological Societies, have also at various times
occupied apartments in Somerset House.
"The royal patronage of the arts," writes Malcolm, in 1806, "is most conspicuous in this grand
building, which contains the apartments of the Royal
Society, the Society of Antiquaries, and the Royal
Academy of Painting. The two former assemble
on the east side of the vestibule or entrance, and
the latter on the west."
The Society of Antiquaries dates its origin from
the year 1751. Malcolm tells us that previous to
that time several unsuccessful, or at least interrupted, attempts had been made, in the reigns of
Elizabeth, James, and Charles I., to establish such
a society, but nothing effective was done until the
reign of George II., who granted a charter, styling
himself the founder and patron of the Society of
Antiquaries, appointing Martin Folkes, Esq., as its
president, and limiting the society's permanent
income to £1,000 a year. The president must
be assisted by a council of twenty members, half
of whom are elected annually, along with himself,
and the officers and members of the society are
required to possess an accurate knowledge of the
history and antiquities of their own and foreign
nations, and to be "loyal and virtuous members of
the community." The Archbishop of Canterbury,
the Lord Chancellor, the Lord Privy Seal, and
the Secretaries of State for the time being, are
visitors of the society. The number of fellows is
not limited by their charter. At their meetings
descriptions and dissertations are read, and illustrative drawings are exhibited. Their transactions
as a body are under the control of an elective
director in the arrangement of communications to
be published. Their official publication, in a
handsome quarto form, is known as the "Archæologia."
Pennant writes, in 1806: "The Royal Society
and the Society of Antiquaries both hold their
meetings here; and here also are annually exhibited the works of the British painters and
sculptors."
Mr. John Timbs, in his "Romance of London,"
tells us an amusing traditionary story relative to
this place:—"A little above the entrance-door
to the Office of Stamps and Taxes is let into the
wall a white watch-face. Of this it is told that
when the wall was being built a workman fell
from the scaffolding, and was saved from being
killed only by the ribbon of his watch, which
caught upon a piece of projecting ornament. In
thankful remembrance of his wonderful preservation, he is said, and is believed to this day, to have
inserted his watch in the face of the wall." A very
pretty story, indeed, if it was only true. But
fortunately for the age of poetry, Mr. Timbs
us into the real secret of the watch, which is espetially prosaic. "It was placed," he says, "impresent position, many years ago, by the Royal
Society, as a meridian mark for a portable transit
instrument in one of the windows of the ante-room;" and the late Admiral W. H. Smyth,
eminent hydrographer to the Admiralty, we
often tell his friends that, having assisted in moving the instrument, he well remembered the was
being inserted in the wall. We fear, therefore,
the poetic view must be dismissed.
Running parallel with the buildings forming
west side of the quadrangle, and having its front
towards Lancaster Place, a new wing was build
1857, from the designs of Mr. Pennethorne, in
style of architecture corresponding with the rest of
the building. Here are the offices of the Inland
Revenue Department, and in the basement sever
rooms are set apart for the printing of postage and
other stamps, postal wrappers, envelopes, &c.
The vaults of Somerset House were formerly
used for the purpose of keeping some of the various
public records, which happily have now all be
collected into one repository in Fetter Lane.
The whole of the east wing was left incomplete
by Sir William Chambers, but in 1829 this part
the edifice was finished from the designs of
Robert Smirke, R.A., and it now forms King's College, which was founded by royal charter in
previous year. The entrance is a neat, though
confined semi-circular archway from the Strand
over which stand the Royal Arms, supported
figures symbolical of Wisdom and Holiness, with
the motto, "Sancte et Sapienter." The building
extends from the Strand to the Thames, and occupies a considerable area of ground. The interior
which is very capacious, is well calculated for
intended objects. The centre of the principal floor
is occupied by the chapel, under which is the hall
for examinations, &c., and a new triangular wing
one storey high, built in a line with Somerset House
and fronting the Thames Embankment, adjoining
the residence of the Principal, is now (1874)
course of erection.
The government of King's College is vested in
a Council, which reports annually to the Court
of Governors and Proprietors, as the official title
of the corporation runs. Forty-two members compose this council, nine of whom are the official
governors; one is the treasurer, eight are life
governors, and the other twenty-four, of whom six
go out every year, are elected by the Court of
Proprietors, from a list prepared by the Governor
There are certain endowments, producing in all
an annual income of £880, which are specially
appropriated to certain prizes, scholarships, and
professorships, classical and scientific; but the
College possesses no endowment applicable to
general purposes, and the whole of the expenditure required for the ordinary every-day work of the
College has to be defrayed out of the fees paid by
the students. The general education of the College
is carried on in six distinct departments—viz., the
theological department; the department of general
literature and science (divided into the classical,
the modern, and the Oriental); the department of
the applied sciences; the medical department; the
evening classes; and finally, the school. This last
is in the hands of a head master, subject to consultation with the principal, who has the general
supervision of the whole College. The scientific
professorships in the department of general literature and science are thirteen in number, of which
two — physiology and practical physiology — are
held by the same individual. There is also a
lecturer in photography. It should be added that
the education given here is strictly in accordance
with the principles of the Church of England.
The students of King's College are divided into
two classes—the "matriculated" and the "occasional." The former are those who are admitted to
the full prescribed course of study, while the latter,
through inability to attend the whole course, devote
themselves to the pursuit of one particular subject,
as at the two great universities of England. The
principals of King's College in the forty years which
have passed since its foundation have been distinguished theologians, Bishops Otter and Lonsdale,
Canon Jelf and Canon Barry.