CHAPTER XXXIII.
HORNSEY.
"To vie with all the beaux and belles,
Away they whip to Hornsey Wells."
Spirit of the Public Journals, 1814.
Etymology of Hornsey—Its Situation and Gradual Growth—The Manor of Hornsey—Lodge Hill—The Bishops' Park—Historical Memorabilia—The New River—Hornsey Wood and "Hornsey Wood House"—An Incident in the Life of Crabbe—Finsbury Park—Appearance of this
District at the Commencement of the Present Century—Mount Pleasant—Hornsey Church—The Grave of Samuel Rogers, Author of "The
Pleasures of Memory"—A Nervous Man—Lalla Rookh Cottage—Thomas Moore—Muswell Hill—The Alexandra Palace and Park—Neighbourhood of Muswell Hill, as seen from its Summit—Noted Residents at Hornsey—Crouch End.
As we have in the preceding chapters been dealing
with Highgate—which, by the way, was originally
but a hamlet situated within the limits of Hornsey—it is but natural that we should here say something of the mother parish. This once rural, but
now suburban village, then, lies about two miles
to the north-east from the top of Highgate Hill,
whence it is approached either by Hornsey Lane
or by Southwood Lane.
The etymology of this locality must be sought
for in its more ancient appellation. From the
thirteenth to the sixteenth century public records
call it "Haringea," "Haringhea," or "Haringey."
About Queen Elizabeth's time it was usually called
"Harnsey," or, as some will have it, says Norden,
"Hornsey." Lysons, indulging in a little pleasantry,
observes that "if anything is to be gathered relating
to its etymology, it must be sought for in its more
ancient appellation, Har-ringe, the meadow of
hares." In "Crosby's Gazetteer," 1816, Hornsey is
described as "a pleasant village situated in a low
valley five miles from London, through which the
New River flows. This place is a favourite resort
of the good citizens of London." Hornsey and
London since that time have approached much
nearer to each other, and it appears probable that
before long it will form a portion of the metropolis.
The opening of the Alexandra Park doubtless
tended strongly to stretch London considerably in
the direction of Hornsey. The citizens of London,
instead of making it a place of occasional resort,
have made it a place of residence. Crosby continues:—"In its vicinity is a small coppice, known
by the name of Hornsey Wood. The Hornsey
Wood House is a famous house of entertainment."
Both the Wood and the "Wood House" have been
swept away, and the sites have been taken into
Finsbury Park. In 1818, as we learn from advertisements of the time, "coaches go daily from the
'White Bear,' Aldersgate Street, at eleven in the
morning; in the afternoon at seven, in the winter,
and at four and eight in the summer." Such, however, have been the changes brought about by the
whirligig of time, that now, during the day, there
are railway trains to and from London and various
parts of Hornsey to the number of upwards of fifty
each way.
The Manor of Hornsey has belonged to the
Bishops of London from a time antecedent to the
Norman Conquest; and in the centuries immediately following that event, those prelates had a
residence here long before they owned a palace on
the banks of the Thames at Fulham. Mr. Prickett
has shown pretty conclusively, in his "History of
Highgate," that the site of this residence is to be
looked for in the centre of Hornsey Great Park,
about half a mile to the north-west of the "High
Gate."
Norden, in his "Speculum Britanniæ," thus describes it:—"There is a hill or fort in Hornsey
Park, called Lodge Hill, for that thereon stood
some time a lodge, when the park was replenished
with deer; but it seemeth by the foundation that
it was rather a castle than a 'lodge;' for the hill
is trenched with two deep ditches, now old and
overgrown with bushes; the rubble thereof, as
brick, tile, and Cornish slate, are in heaps yet to
be seen; the which ruins are of great antiquity, as
may appear by the oaks at this day standing, above
a hundred years' growth, upon the very foundations
of the building." Lysons, writing at the close of
the last century, says that "the greater part of it is
now covered with a copse, but the remains of a
moat or ditch are still to be seen in an adjoining
field." Lysons adds a remark to the effect that
"Bishop Aylmer's house at Hornsey, the burning of
which put him to 200 marks expense, must have
been upon another site." When the bishop's lands
were sold, the Manor of Hornsey passed into the
hands of Sir John Wollaston, of whom we have
spoken in the previous chapter; he held it till his
death, in 1658, after which his widow enjoyed it
till the Restoration. Mr. Prickett adds, that in his
time (1842) the form of the moat which surrounded
it was still visible, and that it covered seventy yards
square. He writes, "The site of the castle is still
uneven, and bears the traces of former foundation;
it is somewhat higher than the ground outside the
trenches. The portion of the moat which still remains consists of a spring constantly running, and
is now used as a watering-place for cattle."
It is almost needless to say here that the park of
the Bishops of London must have been originally
a portion of the great forest of Middlesex, which
we have mentioned in our account of Primrose
Hill (page 287). It occupied a somewhat irregular
triangle, the base of which would extend from
Highgate to Hampstead, while its apex reached
nearly to Finchley northwards. In fact, a great
portion of it still remains as forest-land, though
regarded as a part of Caen Wood.
Hornsey Park is not altogether without its scraps
of history, for it is said to have been the place
where, in the year 1386, the Duke of Gloucester,
the Earls of Arundel, Warwick, and other noblemen, assembled in a hostile manner, and marched
thence to London to oppose Richard II., and to
compel him to dismiss his two favourite ministers—the Earl of Suffolk and Robert Duke of Ireland—from his councils.
As we learn from Stow's "Annals," the Lodge
in Hornsey Park, then the residence of the Duke
of Gloucester, was, in the reign of Henry VI., the
scene of the reputed witchcraft in which Eleanor
Duchess of Gloucester was concerned; for here
the learned Robert Bolingbroke, an astrologer,
and Thomas Southwell, a canon of St. Stephen's,
are alleged to have "endeavoured to consume the
king's person by necromantic art," Southwell having
said masses over the instruments which were to be
used for that purpose. Bolingbroke was executed
as a traitor at Tyburn; Southwell died in the
Tower; whilst the Duchess had to do penance in
the public streets, an incident which Shakespeare
has rendered familiar to his readers in the second
part of the play of Henry VI.
Once more, when the ill-fated and short-lived
Edward V. was brought to London, after his
father's death, under the escort of his uncle,
Richard of Gloucester, he was here met by the
Lord Mayor and 500 citizens of London. Hall,
in his "Chronicles," quaintly tells us that, "When
the kynge approached neere the cytee, Edmonde
Shawe, goldsmythe, then Mayre of the cytie, with
the Aldermenne and shreves [sheriffs] in skarlet,
and five hundreth commoners in murraye, receyved his grace reverently at Harnesay Parke, and
so conveighed him to the cytie, where he entered
the fourth day of May, in the fyrst and last yere
of his reigne."
Henry VII., on his return from a victory in
Scotland, was likewise here met by the Lord
Mayor and citizens of London, and conducted
on his progress to the City in like manner.
Miss Jane Porter states, in her "Scottish Chiefs,"
that "the remains of Wallace were secretly removed
and deposited temporarily in the chapel of Hornsey
Lodge; and that Robert Bruce was concealed at
Lodge Hill, in the garb of a Carmelite, when
Gloucester sent him a pair of spurs, as an intimation that he must depart with all speed;" but it
should be added that neither Lysons nor Prickett,
in their histories of the place, mention these facts,
so that possibly they are somewhat apocryphal.
Few villages near London have retained so rural
a character down to quite recent times as that of
Hornsey; this may perhaps be accounted for by
the fact that both the high north road and the
thoroughfare leading to Cambridge leave the place
untouched. "The surrounding country," writes
the author of the "Beauties of England and
Wales," "is rendered attractive by soft ranges of
hills; and the New River, which winds in a
tortuous progress through the parish, is at many
points a desirable auxiliary of the picturesque."
Hone, in the second volume of his "Every-day
Book," gives an engraving of "The New River at
Hornsey," the spot represented being the garden
of the "Three Compasses" inn. "But," says Mr.
Thorne, in his "Environs of London," "the New
River would now be sought for there in vain; its
course was diverted, and this portion filled up with
the vestigia of a London cemetery."
"About a mile nearer to London than Hornsey,"
observes the Ambulator, in 1774, "is a coppice of
young trees called Hornsey Wood, at the entrance
of which is a public-house, to which great numbers
of persons resort from the City."
"Hornsey Wood House," for such was the
name of this place of entertainment, stood on the
summit of some rising ground on the eastern side
of the parish. It was originally a small roadside
public-house, with two or three wide-spreading
oaks before it, beneath the shade of which the
weary wayfarer could rest and refresh himself.
The wood itself, immediately contiguous to the
house, for some time shared with Chalk Farm the
honour of affording a theatre for cockney duellists.
The building was just beyond the "Sluice House,"
so celebrated for its eel-pies in the last generation. Anglers and other visitors could pass to it
through an upland meadow along a straight gravelwalk anglewise. It was a good, plain, brown-brick,
respectable, modern, London-looking building.
Within the entrance, to the left, was a light and
spacious room of ample accommodation and
dimensions, of which more care seems to have
been taken than of its fine leather folding screen
in ruins, which Mr. Hone, in his "Every-day Book,"
speaks of as "an unseemly sight for him who
respects old requisites for their former beauty and
convenience." "It still bears," he further tells us,
"some remains of a spirited painting spread all
over its leaves, to represent the amusements and
humours of a fair in the low countries. At the
top of a pole, which may have been the village
May-pole, is a monkey with a cat on his back;
then there is a sturdy bear-ward in scarlet, with a
wooden leg, exhibiting Mr. Bruin; an old woman
telling fortunes to the rustics; a showman's
drummer on the stage before a booth beating up
for spectators to the performance within, which
the show-cloth represents to be a dancer on the
tight-rope; a well-set-out stall of toys, with a
woman displaying their attractions; besides other
really interesting 'bits' of a crowded scene, depicted by no mean hand, especially a group coming
from a church in the distance, apparently a wedding
procession, the females well looking and well
dressed, wearing ribbons and scarfs below their
waists in festoons. The destruction of this really
interesting screen, by worse than careless keeping,
is much to be lamented. This ruin of art is
within a ruin of nature. 'Hornsey Tavern' and
its grounds have displaced a romantic portion of
the wood, the remains of which, however, skirt a
large and pleasant piece of water formed at considerable expense. To this water, which is well
stored with fish, anglers resort with better prospects
of success than to the New River; the walk round
it, and the prospect from its banks, are very agreeable."
With advancing years, the old tavern became
more and more frequented, and in the end it was
altered and enlarged, the grounds laid out as teagardens, and the large lake formed, which was much
frequented by cockney anglers. For some time
previous to the demolition of the house, in 1866,
the grounds were used for pigeon-shooting by a
gun-club section of the "upper ten thousand;"
but it was soon superseded as such by the attractions of the "Welsh Harp" and of "Hurlingham."
Hone, in the first volume of his "Every-day Book"
(1826), speaks thus of the old house and its successor:—"The old 'Hornsey Wood House' well
became its situation; it was embowered, and
seemed a part of the wood. Two sisters, a Mrs.
Lloyd and a Mrs. Collier, kept the house; they
were ancient women, large in size, and usually sat
before their door on a seat fixed between two
venerable oaks, wherein swarms of bees hived
themselves. Here the venerable and cheerful
dames tasted many a refreshing cup with their
good-natured customers, and told tales of bygone
days, till, in very old age, one of them passed to
her grave, and the other followed in a few months
afterwards. Each died regretted by the frequenters
of the rural dwelling, which was soon afterwards
pulled down, and the oaks felled, to make room
for the present roomy and more fashionable building. To those who were acquainted with it in its
former rusticity, when it was an unassuming 'calm
retreat,' it is, indeed, an altered spot. To produce
the alteration, a sum of £10,000 was expended
by the present proprietor; and 'Hornsey Wood
Tavern' is now a well-frequented house. The
pleasantness of its situation is a great attraction
in fine weather." The lake was used not merely
for fishing, but also for boating, which was largely
indulged in during the summer months. Indeed,
the attractions of the place seem to have been so
great as to inspire the mind of the prosaic antiquary, Mr. Hone, who commemorates it in the
following sentimental lines:—
"A house of entertainment—in a place
So rural, that it almost doth deface
The lovely scene; for like a beauty-spot
Upon a charming cheek that needs it not,
So 'Hornsey Tavern' seems to me. And yet,
Though nature be forgotten, to forget
The artificial wants of the forgetters
Is setting up oneself to be their betters.
This is unwise; for they are passing wise
Who have no eyes for scenery, and despise
Persons like me, who sometimes have sensations
Through too much sight, and fall in contemplations,
Which, as cold waters cramp and drown a swimmer,
Chill and o'erwhelm me. Pleasant is that glimmer
Whereby trees seem but wood. The men who know
No qualities but forms and axes, go
Through life for happy people. They are so."
We are told in the "Life of Crabbe," by his son,
that Hornsey Wood was one of the favourite haunts
of the poet when he first came to London, and
that he would often spend whole afternoons here
in searching for plants and insects. "On one
occasion," writes his son, "he had walked further
than usual into the country, and felt himself too
much exhausted to return to town. He could not
afford to give himself any refreshment at a publichouse, and much less to pay for a lodging; so he
sheltered himself upon a hay-mow, beguiled the
evening with Tibullus, and when he could read no
longer, slept there till the morning."
Hornsey Wood House was pulled down in 1866,
at which time the tea-gardens and grounds became
absorbed in the so-called Finsbury Park, a large
triangular space, some 120 acres in extent, laid out
with ornamental walks and flower-gardens. It was
opened by Sir John Thwaites, under the auspices
of the Metropolitan Board of Works, in 1869, as a
public recreation-ground and promenade for the
working classes. Why the place is called "Finsbury"
Park it would be difficult for us to say, seeing that it
lies some miles away from Finsbury, the districts of
Holloway, Islington, and Hoxton intervening, and
that the site has always been known as Hornsey
Wood. It ought to be styled, in common honesty,
Hornsey Park.
The Illustrated London News, in noticing the
opening of the park in 1869, says:—"The Act
sanctioning the formation of this park was passed
so far back as 1857. The site is what was formerly
known as Hornsey Wood, which is associated with
many interesting events in the history of North
London. It commands a view of Wood Green,
Highgate, the Green Lanes, and other suburban
retreats. The ground has a gentle southern slope,
from Highgate on the west and towards Stoke
Newington on the east; and is skirted on the
south by the Seven Sisters Road and on the east
by the Green Lanes. The Great Northern Railway
bounds it by a cutting and embankment on the
western side, and latterly the London, Edgware,
and Highgate Railway has been made with a
station adjoining the park. There are several
pleasant walks and drives, and in the centre of the
park a trench has been cut, into which water will
be brought from the New River, and in this way a
pretty artificial lake will be added to the other
attractions. The cost of the freehold land was
about £472 per acre. The funds were principally
raised by a loan, in 1864, of £50,000, at 4½ per
cent., for thirty years, and £43,000 borrowed on
debenture in 1868."
The lake above mentioned is an oblong piece of
water surrounded by pleasant walks, and in parts
shaded by trees, and in it are one or two islands
well covered with young trees, which give to the
lake somewhat the appearance of the "ornamental
waters" in St. James's Park, a similitude borne out
by the number of ducks and other water-fowl
disporting themselves on its surface.
The Seven Sisters Road, skirting the south side
of Finsbury Park, was constructed in 1832, prior
to which time there was no thoroughfare through
Holloway and Hornsey to Tottenham.
In a map of the suburbs of London in 1823,
"Duval's Lane" is shown as running from Lower
Holloway towards Crouch End, with scarcely a
house on either side. A small and crooked road,
marked Hem Lane, with "Duval's House" at the
corner, leads also through fields towards "Hornsey
Wood House," and so into the Green Lanes—all
being open country. The now populous district
of Crouch End appears here as a small group of
private residences. Between the "Wood House"
and Crouch End is Stroud Green, around which are
five or six rustic cottages. On the other side of
the "Wood House" is the "Sluice House," where
privileged persons and customers of "mine host"
went to fish in the New River and to sup upon
eels, for which that place was famous, as stated
above. Upper Holloway itself figures in this map
as a very small collection of houses belonging
apparently to private residents.
A pretty walk from Finsbury Park to Hornsey
Church in fine dry weather is by the pathway
running in a northerly direction over Mount Pleasant, a somewhat steep hill, from which some
pleasant views are to be obtained of the surrounding country, embracing Highgate, the Alexandra
Palace, Epping Forest, Tottenham Church, and
the valley of the river Lea. The summit of Mount
Pleasant is upwards of 200 feet above the level of
the river; and its eastern end, from its peculiar
shape, has been called the Northern Hog's Back.

MAP OF HORNSEY AND NEIGHBOURHOOD IN 1819.
The parish church of Hornsey lies, at some little
distance from the village, in a valley near the
Hornsey Station on the Great Northern Railway,
and its tower forms a conspicuous object in the
view from the neighbouring uplands. With the
exception of the tower, the present fabric is comparatively modern, dating only from about the year
1833; it is built of brick, and is of Gothic architecture. Its predecessor, which was pulled down
in 1832, is stated by Norden and Camden to have
been built with stones taken from the ruins of the
palace of the Bishops of London, about the year
1500. The Ambulator, in 1774, describes the
church as "a poor, irregular building, said to have
been built out of the ruins of an ancient castle."
The tower, which is now profusely covered with
ivy, is built of a reddish sandstone, and is embattled, with a newel turret rising above the northwest corner. On the western face of the tower are
sculptured two winged angels, bearing the arms
of Savage and Warham, successively Bishops of
London, the former of whom came to the see in
1497. It is probable that both of these prelates
were contributors to the fabric. Some of the windows of the present church are filled with stained
glass, and among the monuments are a few preserved from the older building. Among these is a
large mural slab, on which are engraved the kneeling figures of a man, two females, and a boy;
the dress appears to be of the latter part of the
sixteenth century, and the monument was erected
to the memory of George Rey, of Highgate. A
Corinthian column, surmounted with armorial bearings, commemorates Dr. Lewis Atterbury (brother
of the celebrated bishop), some time rector of the
parish, who died in 1731. This monument was
brought hither on the demolition of the old chapel
at Highgate, where, as we have stated in a previous
chapter, Dr. Atterbury was for many years preacher.
Samuel Buckley, the editor of Thuanus, who died
in 1741, is commemorated by a monument; as
also is "Master Richard Candish [Cavendish], of
Suffolk, Esq." An inscription in verse upon the
latter monument informs us that "this memorial
was promised and made by Margaret, Countess of
Cōberland, 1601."

THE ALEXANDRA PALACE (1876).
The churchyard is sheltered by rows of tall elms,
which impart to it an air of retirement and seclusion. Here, amongst other tombs, on the northern
side of the church, is that of the poet Rogers, of
whom we have spoken in our account of St. James's
Place. (fn. 1) It is an altar-tomb, resting on a high base,
and surrounded by an iron railing. The following
are the inscriptions on the face of the tomb:—"In
this vault lie the remains of Henry Rogers, Esq.,
of Highbury Terrace; died December 25, 1832,
aged 58. Also of Sarah Rogers, of the Regent's
Park, sister of the above; died January 29, 1855,
aged 82. Also of Samuel Rogers, author of the
'Pleasures of Memory,' brother of the above-named
Henry and Sarah Rogers; born at Newington
Green, July 30, 1763, died at St. James's Place,
Westminster, December 18, 1855." Near the
south-east corner of the churchyard an upright
stone marks the grave of Anne Jane Barbara, the
youngest daughter of Thomas Moore, the poet.
Amongst the rectors of Hornsey there have been
a few who have become known beyond the circle
of the parish. Of these we may mention Thomas
Westfield, who resigned the living in 1637, afterwards Bishop of Bristol, and who is described as
"the most nervous of men." His biographer says
that "he never, though almost fifty years a preacher,
went up into the pulpit but he trembled; and never
preached before the king but once, and then he
fainted." "Yet he was held in such esteem by
all parties," writes Mr. Howitt in his "Northern
Heights of London," "that on May 13, 1643, the
committee for sequestrating the estates of delinquents, being informed that his tenants refused to
pay his rents as Bishop of Bristol, speedily compelled them, and granted him a safe conduct for
his journey to Bristol with his family, being a man
of great learning and merit, and advanced in years.
His successor at Hornsey, Thomas Lant, did not
meet with quite such agreeable treatment. He was
turned out of his living and house with great cruelty
by the Puritans, who would not allow him even to
procure a place of retirement. Samuel Bendy,
rector in 1659, petitioned the committee, setting
forth that his income was only £92, out of which
he had to pay £16 to the wife and children of the
late incumbent. The committee made him recompense." The Rev. William Cole, the Cambridge
antiquary, and the friend and correspondent of
Horace Walpole, held the rectory for about a year
in the middle of the last century.
At the end of the lane running west from the
church, and at the foot of Muswell Hill, is Lalla
Rookh Cottage, where Moore was residing in 1817
when he wrote, or, at all events, when he published,
the poem bearing the title of "Lalla Rookh," for
which, as we learn from his "Life," he received
£3,000 from Messrs. Longmans, the publishers.
In this house his youngest daughter died, as above
stated.
A native of Dublin and a son of Roman Catholic
parents, Moore came over to England when still
young to push his fortunes in the world of literature, and became the poet laureate of Holland
House and of the Whig party. During his latter
years he occupied Sloperton Cottage, a small house
adjoining Lord Lansdowne's park at Bowood,
near Calne, in Wiltshire, where he died in 1852, at
the age of seventy-three. Lord Russell claims for
Moore the first place among our lyric poets, but
few will be willing to allow his superiority to Robert
Burns, though he was certainly the English Beranger.
He was probably the best hand at improvised songwriting on the common topics of every-day life, but
he had no real depth of feeling. A refined, voluptuous, and natural character, equally frank and gay,
he passed, after all, a somewhat butterfly existence,
and has left behind him but little that will last
except his "Irish Melodies."
Continuing along the pleasant lane westward
from Lalla Rookh Cottage, we come to Muswell
Hill, a place which has now become familiar
to Londoners—and, probably, to the majority of
readers—from the fact that its summit and sides
are for the most part occupied by the Alexandra
Palace and Park, which covers altogether an area
of about five hundred acres. Before venturing to
give a description of this place of amusement, or
a narrative of its unfortunate career, we may be
pardoned for saying a few words about the hill
whereon it is situated.
Muswell Hill, then, we may observe, derives its
name from a famous well on the top of the hill,
where formerly the fraternity of St. John of Jerusalem, in Clerkenwell, had their dairy, with a large
farm adjacent. Here they built a chapel for the
benefit of some nuns, in which they fixed the image
of Our Lady of Muswell. These nuns had the sole
management of the dairy; and it is singular that
the said well and farm do, at this time, belong to
the parish of St. James, Clerkenwell. The water
of this spring was then deemed a miraculous cure
for scrofulous and cutaneous disorders; and, as
tradition says, a king of Scotland—whose name, by
the way, does not transpire—being afflicted with a
painful malady, made a pilgrimage hither, and was
perfectly cured. At any rate, the spring was much
resorted to, and became an object of pilgrimage in
the Middle Ages; indeed, for some considerable
time there was a great throng of pilgrims to the
shrine of Our Lady, who came laden with their
offerings and buoyed up with their hopes from all
parts of the country.
Lysons, writing in 1795, remarks that "the well
still remains; but," he somewhat naïvely adds, "it
is not famed, as I find, for any extraordinary virtues."
Muswell farmhouse, with the site of the chapel,
together with the manor of Muswell, was alienated
in 1546 by William Cowper to William Goldynge,
and, after a few other changes of ownership, passed
into the hands of the Rowes, in whose possession it continued at the end of the seventeenth
century. It soon afterwards came into the family
of Pulteney; and, according to Lysons, on the
death of Lady Bath, devolved, under Sir William
Pulteney's will, on the Earl of Darlington. Muswell
Hill, it may be added, was in former times called
also Pinsenhall Hill.
Shortly after the close of the second International
Exhibition (that of 1862) at South Kensington, it
was resolved to erect on this spot a place of popular
entertainment for the working classes of northern
London, which should rival the Crystal Palace at
Sydenham. To the great mass of people in the
north of London the Crystal Palace, except on great
occasions and great attractions, is so distant as to
be almost inaccessible; and it is reported, as was
proved by railway returns, it is mainly the south
London population which keeps up the great building "over the water." There seemed no valid
reason, therefore, why the north of London, with
at least three times the number of inhabitants,
should not be able to support a Crystal Palace of
its own. It was considered, moreover, that the
Alexandra Palace—for such the building was to be
named, in honour of the Princess Alexandra—would
not be dependent on support from local influences.
The rare beauty of its site, which probably has not
its equal anywhere round London, together with
the special attractions in the building, would be
sure to make it a universal favourite with both the
north and south of the metropolis.
With regard to the palace itself, it was decided
to purchase some portion of the materials of the
International Exhibition, and with them to erect
the building on the summit of Muswell Hill, in
the same manner as the originators of its prototype
at Sydenham had purchased for that purpose the
materials of the Great Exhibition of 1851. The
new palace, therefore, was almost entirely built out
of the materials of the Great Exhibition of 1862,
but totally altered and improved in their re-construction. It had only one of the noble domes in
the centre transept, with two less lofty octagon
towers at either end. It had one main nave, exclusive of the entrances, about 900 feet long, and
three cross transepts of about 400 feet each. The
building was beautifully decorated in the Renaissance
style; and round the eight columns which supported the great central dome were ranged groups
of statuary surrounded by flowers. Behind this
ornamental walk were placed the cases for the
exhibitors, mixed, as in the nave itself, with flowers
and statuary. Then there were a variety of courts—such as the glass court, china court, furniture
court, courts for French goods, courts for American,
Indian, Italian—in short, all the courts which we
are accustomed to find in a regular exhibition. At
the north end of the centre transept was built a
splendid organ by Willis, decorated in a style to
be in harmony with its surroundings, and in front
of this was the orchestra. A large concert-room
was in another part of the building. Then there
was a theatre capable of holding 2,000 spectators,
and having a stage as large as that of Drury Lane
Theatre.
During the progress of the building, sundry
stoppages and hindrances arose from various
causes; and in the grounds great difficulty was
at times experienced through the subsidence of
the soil; indeed, to use the words of one of the
contractor's foremen, the hills round Muswell had
during one winter "been slipping about like anything." Strange as such a statement may seem, it
is literally true. The hills, it is asserted, had been
moving in all sorts of directions. They are mostly
of gravel, but resting, at about twenty feet deep,
on a two-feet seam of soapy clay, which, when the
superincumbent mass was thoroughly penetrated by
the constant rain, allowed it to slip. Fortunately,
the Alexandra Palace was so deeply moored in its
foundations that it never shifted or showed the
slightest signs of any subsidence or yielding in any
direction; yet a very formidable landslip took
place close by it, and in one night between three
and four acres slipped quietly down a few feet.
Another hill came forward as much as three inches
in a single night, but beyond this landslip none of
the hills round the palace have moved to any
material extent, except where the viaduct for the
railway crosses over a small valley just before
arriving at the palace.
After a delay of some six or seven years beyond
the first appointed time, the palace and grounds
being all but completed, the place was opened to the
public on the 24th of May, 1873. The proceedings, though not graced by the presence of royalty,
were as successful an inauguration of a national
institution as could possibly have been expected.
The opening was inaugurated by a grand concert,
presided over by Sir Michael Costa, in which some
of the leading singers of the day took part. But,
alas! about mid-day on the 9th of June the whole
building fell a prey to the flames, and all that was
left was a melancholy and gutted ruin. The fire
originated at the base of the great dome, where
some workmen had been employed in "repairing
the roof," and had, possibly, let some lighted
tobacco fall into a crevice. During the brief period
the palace was open (fourteen days only) it was
visited by as many as 124,124 persons, and its
success was no longer doubtful. Thus encouraged,
the directors resolved at once to rebuild the palace,
and in its re-construction they availed themselves
of the experience so dearly purchased, particularly
with reference to arrangements for protection from
fire.
The new building, which was opened on the 1st
of May, 1875, occupies an area of about seven
acres, and is constructed in the most substantial
manner. It contains the grand hall, capable of
seating 12,000 visitors and an orchestra of 2,000;
the Italian garden, a spacious court in which are
asphalte paths, flower-beds, and a fine fountain;
also the concert-room, which has been erected on
the best known acoustic principles, and will seat
3,500 visitors. The conservatory is surmounted by
a glass dome, and in close proximity are two spacious halls for the exhibition of works of art; also
the corridor for displaying ornamental works. The
reading-room is a very comfortable apartment, and
near thereto are the modern Moorish house and
an Egyptian villa. The theatre is of the most
perfect kind, and will seat more than 3,000 persons.
The exhibition department is divided into two
parts, the space occupied being 204 feet by 106
feet. The bazaar department is 213 feet by 140
feet. The frontage of the stalls is upwards of
3,000 feet, and they are so arranged as to give
the greatest facility of access to visitors and purchasers. The picture-galleries are on the northern
side of the building, and comprise six fine, large,
well-lighted rooms. The refreshment department
is of the most complete and extensive character,
including spacious grill and coffee rooms, two
banqueting rooms, drawing, billiard, and smoke
rooms, and private rooms for large or small
parties, and the grand dining saloon, which will
accommodate as many as 1,000 persons at table.
For the efficient supply of this vast establishment,
the plan of the basement is considered to be the
most perfect as well as the most extensive of its
kind ever yet seen. Also, within the building, are
numerous private offices for manager and clerks,
and a spacious board-room.
The park is richly timbered, and of a pleasingly
undulated surface, intersected by broad carriage
drives, and there are several ornamental lakes of
great beauty in connection with the surrounding
scenery; a number of Swiss chalets and other
rustic buildings, also horticultural gardens, with
extensive ranges of glass houses. At the foot of
the hill on which the palace stands there is a racecourse upwards of a mile in length, and the grand
stand is one of the handsomest and most substantial buildings of its kind in this country.
There is also a trotting ring on the American
principle, and, in connection therewith, an extensive range of stabling for several hundred horses,
thus rendering the property well adapted for horse
and agricultural shows; and a grand stand and
paddock. The cricket-ground is ten acres in
extent, with two pavilions, and every convenience
for cricketers. There is also a Japanese village,
comprising a temple, a residence, and a bazaar. In
the bazaar articles of Japanese work were offered
for sale. A circus for equestrian performances was
likewise erected in the grounds, together with a
spacious banqueting hall, an open-air swimmingbath, and other novel features. Besides all these
attractions, there is a charming and secluded nook
in the grounds, called the Grove, bordering on the
Highgate Road. In a house here, Thrale, the
brewer, is reported to have lived, and to have had
among his guests the great lexicographer of the
Georgian era, as is testified to this day by a pathway shaded by trees, called Dr. Johnson's Walk.
The Grove has been described by an able writer
as "a wild natural garden, clothed with the
utmost beauty to which the luxuriance of our
northern vegetation can attain. On one side a
low, thick hedge of holly, pillared by noble oaks,
flanks a great terrace-walk, commanding a noble
view over a slope which descends rapidly from the
prickly barrier. Very few such oaks are to be
found within this island: lofty, sturdy, and wellgrown trees, not marked by the hollow boles and
distorted limbs of extreme old age, but in the very
prime of vegetable manhood. Turning at right
angles, at the end of this semi-avenue, the walk
skirts a rapid descent, clothed with turf of that
silky fineness which denotes long and careful
garden culture, and set with a labyrinth of trees,
each one of which is a study in itself. A noble
cedar of Lebanon rises in a group of spires like a
foreshortened Gothic cathedral. A holly, which,
from its perfect and unusual symmetry, deceives
the eye as to size, and looks like a sapling close at
hand, has a bole of some fifteen feet girth, rising
for twenty-four feet before it breaks into branches.
Towering Scotch firs look down from a yet loftier
height. Farther on, the walk is bordered by
laurel hedges, and overlooks a wide sweep of
country, undulated, wooded, and studded by many
a spiry steeple to the north; and here we meet
with an elm, standing alone on the turf, as perfect
in its giant symmetry as the holly we have just
admired. Then, perhaps, the monarch of all, we
come upon a gigantic chestnut, which seems as if,
like the trees once in the Garden of Eden, no
touch of iron had ever fallen upon its limbs. Its
twining and bowing branches droop to the very
ground and rise again; resting, not rooting, to
emulate the vegetable peristyle of the banyan."
This pleasant, shady avenue is just within, or on
the borders of, the Alexandra Park.
The view from the top of the hill on which the
palace stands is, perhaps, unrivalled for beauty
within many miles of London. At our feet, looking northwards, is Southgate, of which Leigh Hunt
wrote that it was a pleasure to be born in so sweet
a village, cradled, not only in the lap of Nature,
which he loved, but in the midst of the truly
English scenery which he loved beyond all other.
"Middlesex is," he adds, "a scene of greenery and
nestling villages, and Southgate is a prime specimen
of Middlesex. It is a place lying out of the way of
innovation, and therefore it has the pure sweet air
of antiquity about it." And the remark is true,
with a few exceptions, of all the towns and villages
of this district. Look along the line of railway
that branches off at Wood Green, and you will see
the Enfield where Keats grew to be a poet, and
where Charles Lamb died. Look a little to the
left, and there is Colney Hatch Asylum, with its
two thousand inmates. A little farther on lies
Hadley Wood, a lovely spot for a picnic; and
there rises the grey tower of Barnet Church, reminding you of the battle of Barnet, fought but a
little farther on. A little on our left is Finchley
Common, where they still show us Grimaldi's
Cottage and Dick Turpin's Oak. If we look over
Wood Green, now a town, but a short time back
a wild common, we see in the far distance Tottenham and Edmonton, and what remains of Epping
Forest. Hornsey, with its ivy tower, is just beneath; to our right is Highgate; and a little farther
on is Hampstead Heath.
Johnson's friend, Topham Beauclerc, it may be
added, lived for some time on Muswell Hill; and
Sir Robert Walpole, it is asserted, also resided at
one time in this locality. Boswell is silent as to
the connection of the former with this place, and
for the residence of Sir Robert Walpole here we
have only a local tradition.
Among its inhabitants during the last century
was Lawrence, the "mad" Earl Ferrers, who lodged
here for some months previous to committing the
murder of his steward, for which he was executed at
Tyburn. (fn. 2) His conduct even whilst here was most
eccentric, and such as might fairly have consigned
him to a lunatic asylum. He mixed with the lowest
company, would drink coffee out of the spout of
a kettle, mix his porter with mud, and shave one
side of his face. He threatened more than once
to "do for" his landlady, and on another occasion he violently broke open on a Sunday the
stable where his horse was locked up, knocking
down with his fist the ostler's wife when she asked
him to wait a few minutes while her husband
brought the key.
Another resident at Hornsey in former times
was the learned John Lightfoot, the commentator,
who selected this spot in order that he might have
access to the library at Sion College. Lightfoot,
who was born at the beginning of the seventeenth
century, is stated to have published his first work,
entitled "Erubhim; or, Miscellanies Christian and
Judaical," in 1629, the next year after settling at
Hornsey. He was a strong promoter of the Polyglott Bible, and at the Restoration was appointed
one of the assistants at the Savoy Conference. In
1675 he became Vice-Chancellor of the University
of Cambridge.
Crouch End, which lies to the south-west of the
village, is connected with the Highgate Archway
Road by the sloping lands of Hornsey Rise.
Stroud Green, of which we have spoken in our
account of the manor of Highbury, (fn. 3) is in this
district; and although it is fast being encroached
upon by the demon of bricks and mortar, it has
still some few shady lanes and "bits" of rural
scenery left. On rising ground on the south side
of Crouch End stands Christ Church, one of the
district churches of Hornsey. It was built in 1863,
from the designs of Mr. A. W. Blomfield, and is a
neat edifice, in the Gothic style of architecture.
The church was enlarged about ten years later,
when a tower and spire were added. St. Luke's
Church, Hornsey Rise, built in 1861, from the
designs of Mr. A. D. Gough, is a respectable
common-place modern Gothic building; and consists of a nave with side aisles, transepts, and
chancel with side chapels.
At the beginning of 1877 a handsome Gothic
church was consecrated here; it is dedicated to
the Holy Innocents, and stands near the railway
station. This church was the third which had been
built during the incumbency of Canon Harvey, in
which period Hornsey has grown from a mere
village into a town of some 10,000 inhabitants.