OF THE REVENUES OF THE ARCHBISHOPRIC.
THE revenues of the archbishopric ought not to be
passed by in silence. They were antiently very large,
sufficient to maintain the honourable state in which the
archbishop always appeared suitable to his high dignity
and station in the church; the several manors which
formerly belonged to the see, are recorded in Domesday, and are mentioned in the description of the several
parishes in which they lay, throughout the course of
the history of Kent. (fn. 1) There is an antient taxation of
the temporalities and spiritualities of it, in the black
book of the archdeacon of Canterbury, in which it appears, the sum total of the taxation of these manors
within this county, was 1499l. 15s. 8d. (fn. 2) and in the
dioceses of Chichester, Winchester, and in London
and Middlesex, 549l. 15s. 11d. of his spirituals 200l.
making in all the sum of 2249l. 11s. 8d. (fn. 3) a great income in those days, and increasing in value yearly.—The present taxation of the revenues of the archbishopric is, 2682l. 12s. 2d. according to Ecton, notwithstanding the many possessions taken from it. (fn. 4) —The rich and noble manors, together with many stately
castles and palaces appurtenant to them belonging to
the archbishopric, which composed the above revenue
could not but raise the envy of the hungry courtiers in
those reigns of ecclesiastical plunder under Henry VIII.
Edward VI. and Elizabeth; when, under the colour
of reformation, this archbishopric was stripped of its
most valuable possessions, which were seized on, exchanged and alienated as were thought proper, especially such as appeared to continue to the metropolitan
that state of power and grandeur, which it was determined he should be deprived of.
These grants and exchanges are mentioned throughout the course of the above History, and therefore
need not be repeated here; it is sufficient to say, they
were very many and made at different times. In this
critical juncture, archbishop Cranmer, in the two former reigns, is said to have done all in his power, and
that appears to have been very little indeed, to preserve
the revenues of his see, and that he procured the best
exchanges and bargains that he could at that time; but
whatever efforts he made, they were in vain, all the exchanges were to his disadvantage, as much as if he had
given gold and received brass for it in return. Strype,
in his life of archbishop Cranmer, has given a full account of these proceedings, and in the Augmentationoffice, the deeds of them are numerous; I shall only
observe in general, that those revenues which were
settled upon the archbishopric, in lieu of what it was
deprived, chiefly consisted of lands or of tithes and appropriations, taken from the late dissolved religious
houses, and even these lands when they were suspected
to turn out more valuable than was intended, were
often taken away again, and others of inferior value
were settled in lieu of them, at the king's pleasure;
and this arbitrary traffic was continued in the beginning of the reign of queen Elizabeth, whilst archbishop
Parker remained in this see, (fn. 5) and had not an act passed
on king James's accession to the crown, which disabled the archbishops and bishops of this realm from
alienating any of the revenues and possessions of their
bishoprics in future, long before this time, in all probability, they would have been stripped of every valuable possession belonging to them; but although the
see of Canterbury was by the above-mentioned means,
bereaved of almost all its most desirable estates, yet it
has now, by the increase in the value of lands, and
other things from which the income of it arises, become
a large and handsome revenue, being estimated at the
yearly value, coibs annis, of 10,000l. besides other ca
sual advantages and emoluments arising from the seseveral patent and other offices in the archbishop's gift
and nomination.