ST. JOHN'S COLLEGE
History
St. John's College was founded in 1557
by Sir Thomas White, a leading member
of the Merchant Taylors' Company, who
had been Lord Mayor for the year ending Nov. 1554.
In the summer of 1554, when he bought the manor of
Fyfield, Berks., and other property, he must have had
a college in view, but it was only in Dec. 1554 that he
obtained from Christ Church, practically as a gift, the
site and buildings of St. Bernard's College, on condition that within three years he would found a college
there. Possession could not be given him until Ladyday
1555. (fn. 1) A trace of this transaction remains in the statutes,
where it is laid down (fn. 2) that if among the fellows or exfellows of the college there is no candidate suitable for
the post of President, choice shall be made of one of
the canons of Christ Church. The buildings were comparatively new, and if the quadrangles of New College
and Corpus Christi were adequate for colleges of 70
and 40 respectively, the quadrangle of St. Bernard's
would accommodate 50, which was the number at
which the founder aimed. There is a deed of May 1555
by which the founder transferred the site to Alexander
Belsyre and three others, (fn. 3) but they were only feoffees,
and the buildings were occupied by workmen until
1557. The chapel, hall, and rooms had to be furnished,
and the east side of the quadrangle was still unfinished
when St. Bernard's came to an end.
There is a well-known story that the founder was
guided to St. Bernard's by a dream in which he saw a
building and near it two elm-trees springing from one
stem, and for generations a tree of this kind was identified as the Founder's Tree. Contemporary evidence
proves that there is some truth in the story. Campion,
in his funeral oration (fn. 4) of 1567, says that the founder
had spoken to him of a dream in which he saw some
ancient buildings with a row of elm-trees at the side,
and that the buildings of St. Bernard's seemed to him
like what he had seen in his dream, but it was not one
particular tree which was the feature but a row of trees.
At that time there was such a row where now are Cook's
Buildings.
The object of the foundation was to 'strengthen the
orthodox faith, in so far as it is weakened by the damage
of time and the malice of men' and especially 'to help
theology, much afflicted of late, as we see with sorrow
and grief'. (fn. 5) The college was to provide educated clergy
who could hold their own in argument with Lutherans
and Calvinists.
The founder went to Corpus Christi College for his
statutes and borrowed them almost verbatim, but unlike that college he did not divide his scholars into two
classes discipuli and socii; they were to be all of one
class, as at New College. A lad on his election was a
fellow at once, although he had no voice in college
matters for the first two years; and he might remain a
fellow for the whole of his life if he took priest's orders
within somewhat less than five years after taking the
M.A. degree. Of course, he lost his fellowship by marrying or by inheriting wealth of £10 a year. This definition of wealth also applied to the holding of livings, but
in the case of Doctors of Divinity it was raised to £15, (fn. 6)
and as the value of a living was according to the low
valuation of the King's Book of 1536, it was often possible to hold a living without forfeiting the fellowship.
A man had difficulties about residing in his parish, for
the statutes ordained that under normal conditions no
fellow should be absent from Oxford for more than
60 days in the year. But the statutes allowed that ex
causis promotionis a fellow might have 60 days more
and that 'for a most urgent cause' this might be doubled; (fn. 7)
and there was a provision that for every sermon preached
a man might claim tempus absentie; (fn. 8) in the case of
important sermons a man was allowed 10 days, but in
ordinary cases the allowance was 8 days for each
sermon. In this way a beneficed fellow could be absent
for the whole year and yet retain the emoluments of
his fellowship, if the benefice was less than £10 in the
King's Book. Of the 50 fellows, 12 were to study law;
but they lost their fellowships if at the end of 12 years
they were not in priest's orders; actually few or none
of these legists took orders. As an inducement to early
ordination there was an additional payment of 2 marks
a year to those who were in priest's orders; (fn. 9) all fellows
in holy orders were to preach from time to time in the
college manors, their expenses being paid by the college.
In the earliest set of statutes, made in 1562, 12 places
in the college were reserved for lads from 'the school
at London', which must mean Christ's Hospital, and
one from the school of Tonbridge, but the rest were to
be filled by the college from other sources; the founder
suggests from Coventry School, or from Winchester
College, or from the choristers of the college, but above
all from colleges and halls in Oxford, provided that the
candidates had been at Oxford for the greater part of a
year. (fn. 10) But an important change was made in the
statutes of 1566. By that time the Merchant Taylors'
School, founded in 1561, with the help and encouragement of Sir Thomas White, had proved a success, and
the founder reserved to it 37 places. On St. Barnabas
day the President with two fellows was to be present
in London, and with the Master of the Merchant
Taylors' Company elect from the school to fill what
vacancies there were; generally there were about three
vacancies, but in one year there was none. To Bristol
and Coventry, towns in which White was interested,
two places each were reserved; two to Reading, where
the founder was born; and one to Tonbridge School,
which was created by Andrew Judd, the founder's
friend. Six places were for those who were of the
founder's kin, by which was meant those who could
trace descent from either of the founder's grandfathers.
Two other small changes were made in 1566; the
period of probation for a fellow was extended from two
years to three, and the Visitors of the college were to
be William Roper and William Cordell, Master of the
Rolls, the founder's friends. When they died, the
Visitor would be the Bishop of Winchester, as at
Corpus.
The college, which was under the patronage of St.
John the Baptist, the patron saint of tailors, began
at Michaelmas 1557 with 20 members. Alexander
Belsyre, canon of Christ Church, was President; five
of the others were already M.A.; two were B.A.; others
were near that degree, and seven were freshmen. They
were, of course, all chosen by the founder and, as long
as he lived, the college had no share in electing its
members or even its officers. The funds of the college
for its first fifteen years were so deficient that they could
not maintain more than half the intended number, and
it was not until 1583 that the college was filled. Besides
the fellows, there were commoners; by the statutes they
were limited to 16 in number, (fn. 11) and the founder in a
letter of the autumn of 1566 ordered that there should
be no more than 12; but, eighteen months after the
death of the Founder, at Michaelmas 1568, when the
bursars' accounts begin, they were more than 40; and
although there was not room for so many when the
college was able to maintain more fellows, they were
rarely less than 25. In the early years of the college a
majority of the commoners did not take any degree
and some were never matriculated. They were not
really members of the college, but lodgers who were
allowed to rent a room (or part of a room) within the
college, to be near their tutors. What instruction they
received and what they paid for it was their own concern; the college was not responsible for their instruction or their behaviour, but disorderly lodgers could no
doubt be expelled and attendance at chapel was required
of them. It must be remembered that the allowance
to scholars and also to graduates according to the college
statutes was so meagre that additional income was
required. Even the Masters received only £2 13. 4d.
a year in cash and the bursars accounts show that few
could keep their battels (i.e. the food they bought
beyond their commons) below £2 a year. Some of the
seniors received additional pay from holding college
offices, but probably many bachelors and masters would
have been unable to live but for acting as tutors. Commoners were allowed to have dinner and supper in hall,
but at their own cost; it was a matter of arrangement
between the commoners and the manciple. In hall there
was a commoners' table, but some favoured commoners
were allowed to sit at the bachelors' table, or the masters'
table, or even at the high table as a mark of honour, but
wherever they sat they had the commons of commoners.
There is no register of the admission of commoners;
but in those years for which the bursars' accounts
survive we have their names; for, like those on the
foundation, they were allowed to buy additional food
from the buttery, which was practically a shop kept by
the college, and the bursars' rolls mention every man's
battels each quarter. Many commoners remained only
for a term or two, others for several years. We also hear
from time to time in the college register of poor scholars
or servitors, of whom there were 20 in 1612 and 8 in
1667. (fn. 12) They are not mentioned in the college statutes,
nor do they appear in the bursars' accounts; they
received from the college no rooms, no commons, no
pay, nor did they have battels; though undergraduates
they were private servants maintained by some of the
members of the college. The buildings were very
crowded, and many of the rooms contained three or
four persons. It is probable that portions of the room
were boarded off, about 9 ft. square or less, to form
studies. Those under 16 years of age slept two in a
bed. (fn. 13) In the years 1570 to 1573 the top story was
added on two sides of the quadrangle to provide more
space.
The college has always been famed for its garden,
and it is the founder who acquired it. The southern
half of it was originally part of the grounds of Durham
College, but when Durham College and Bernard
College were in the hands of the king, he assigned half
the garden to Bernard College, and about 1558 the
wall was built which stands between Trinity College
and St. John's. Before the founder died (Feb. 1567),
he had obtained four acre strips in the open fields,
lying immediately to the north of the original wall of
Durham College; these were enclosed with a wall
about 1606 and became the bachelors' garden, on the
north side of the masters' garden. Letters written by
the founder, shortly before his death, show that he had
foreseen the necessity of acquiring the tenements
adjacent to the college on either side, and also the
strips in the open field which are now part of the
President's garden.
The endowment provided by the founder was the
whole of Fyfield and small manors in Long Wittenham,
Warborough, Shillingford, Frilford, and Garford, a
rent of £40 from the town of Coventry, land in Northmoor and Cumnor, and tithes worth £60; the whole
amounted to £280 a year, but £50 was leasehold tithes,
and would lapse in time. In 1560 he bought the site
and buildings of the White Friars for £63, and in the
same year the site and buildings of Gloucester College,
the price being probably about £100, as it was let for
£7 a year. The founder stipulated (fn. 14) that his brother
and his heirs male should hold Fyfield at a fixed rent
of £38, and it was only in 1728 that the college, by
the death of Francis White, obtained control of Fyfield,
its value at that time being reckoned at £240 a year. (fn. 15)
An important part of the endowment, though it
produced no rent, was a portion of Bagley Wood,
which the founder wisely purchased in 1557 for £270.
Two other portions were acquired in 1584 and 1619,
and in consequence St. John's, more than any college,
had close at hand a good supply of wood blocks, faggots,
and charcoal. (fn. 16)
The first years of the college were disturbed and
there were four presidents in five years. Belsyre was
dismissed by the founder in 1559 for dishonesty; (fn. 17) his
successor, William Eley, would not accept the settlement of religion in 1560 and resigned. William Stock,
who was appointed by the President to be his successor,
resigned or was deprived in 1564, and, from what we
know of his later years, the second word is the more
likely. He then became Principal of Gloucester Hall
for a time and held two livings, if not more; yet he
could not, or would not, pay his debts to the college,
until the college gave him an additional living. That
Stock was an unsatisfactory President is suggested by
the fact that a lay friend of the founder, named Yaxley,
was in charge of the college in 1563. (fn. 18) Finally in 1564
the founder nominated John Robinson of Cambridge
to be President, and in 1566 in his last illness decreed
that John James, one of the original fellows of the
college, who had ceased to be a fellow in 1563 when
he was made sub-dean of Salisbury, should be perpetual
Vice-President, (fn. 19) no matter what his wealth might be,
with permission to be non-resident; no doubt he hoped
that a man of his legal experience would be able to
guide the college through the difficulties which
threatened.
The founder died in London on 12 Feb. 1567 and
was buried in the college chapel on 24 Feb., according
to the provisions of his will. A trustworthy account (fn. 20) of
the funeral speaks of its magnificence; all the heads of the
University were present; banners were carried in the
procession; after the funeral there was a feast for all
the company, followed by the delivery of a Latin speech
by Campion (fn. 21) in praise of the founder. Sixteen of his
letters survive for the years 1560 to 1567, which show
his desire for hard study, for reverence in worship, and
for unity among the fellows.
The college was in financial difficulties as soon as
the founder died. He had himself paid from time to
time any deficits in the college accounts, but it is
evident that between 1557 and 1567 the profits of his
business had been less than formerly, and the endowment he had planned was far from being reached. By
the law of London his widow could claim half his
personal property, and as he had failed to secure real
estate to the value of 400 marks a year for his wife's
jointure as he had promised, he had incurred a penalty
of £4,000. If the widow had claimed this sum, there
would have been nothing for the college, except after
her death that portion of the jointure which he had
completed, viz. house property in London worth 200
marks a year. This by the founder's will was to become
the property of the college. After long delay 'the
Foundress', as she was called, promised in 1570 that
she would not exact the penalty, but the founder's
estate was to furnish £3,000 to complete her jointure,
and on her death the whole would be added to the
endowment of the college. She died in 1572, but it
was only in 1574 that the college (its numbers reduced
to 20) was able to begin the annual election from
Merchant Taylors' School. It was some years before
the college received the full amount of the jointure of
the foundress, and in 1575 Sir William Cordell, as
Visitor, advised that the choir, consisting of four clerks
and six choristers, should be discontinued, partly to
secure more room in the college, but mainly to save
expense.
In 1572, when John Robinson resigned on being
appointed canon (subsequently Precentor) of Lincoln
Cathedral, and there was no fellow or ex-fellow suitable for election, a canon of Christ Church, Toby
Mathew, was chosen. He resigned in 1577 when he
became Dean of Christ Church, and in the previous
five years he must often have been absent from Oxford,
as he was much in request for sermons.
In the course of 1572 and 1573 eight fellows or
ex-fellows of the college migrated to Douai. These
were John Bavant and Gregory Martin, who had left
the college in 1564 and 1568 respectively through
preferment; William Wiggs, who had ceased to be
fellow at Michaelmas 1571, probably for the same
reason; Humfry Eley, Thomas Bramston, and Edmund
Campion, who were all in receipt of their fellowships
at Michaelmas 1572, (fn. 22) and perhaps later; while Henry
Shaw and Henry Holland, who were present at a
college meeting on 30 June 1573, were at Douai within
a month or two. Of these eight, the youngest had
joined the college in 1563 and all were of the degree
of M.A. except Eley and Bramston. A man did not lose
his fellowship by going to Douai or being a Romanist,
but by breaking the college statutes, one of them being
that a fellow might not be absent from Oxford for more
than 60 days in the year without leave. This remarkable migration was not due to anything that had
happened in the college; for three of them were already
ex-fellows, while Campion, Eley, and Bramston had
been absent from the college for two years, but with
leave. John Robinson who was President until 1572
was far from a Romaniser, and the perpetual VicePresident was a canon of Salisbury, and so far as we
know adverse to the old religion. All the eight had
been in the college at the same time in 1564 and it is
probable that Gregory Martin and Campion were the
first to reach Douai, and persuaded the others to join
them. It may be added that Campion was holding a
travelling fellowship which would not end until
Michaelmas 1575. Of course, for a time the men of
St. John's were viewed with suspicion. When Jonas
Meredith supplicated for the degree of M.A. in Oct.
1573 he was refused because his religion was suspect; (fn. 23)
and when, in the course of the next year, he was expelled
from the college for a breach of the statutes, he joined
the Church of Rome, became a priest, and was subsequently imprisoned at Wisbech. Likewise Arthur
Torless, a fellow of founder's kin, who applied for
the degree of M.A. at the same time, was rejected on
three grounds, religionis suspicio, morum improbitas, et
literarum ignoratio. (fn. 24) In March 1574 when a commoner,
Thomas Powle, wished to determine as a bachelor, he
was required to state that he accepted the articles of
religion of the Church of England. (fn. 25) After this the
University was content with the religion of the college,
and from 1574 no fellow joined the Church of Rome
for many years. But the idea arose among later
historians, such as Fuller and Wood, that it was a
college of Recusants, and therefore they attributed to
religious motives the withdrawal of Belsyre, Stock, and
Case, being unaware of the true reasons. In religious
matters the college was like any other college; the
bursars' accounts show that the services in the chapel
were far from elaborate, the Communions were infrequent, and the banners and vestments given by the
founder and still owned by the college are described
in the college register as 'superstitious stuff'. When a
visitation of the college was held in 1574, (fn. 26) the Visitors
found much cause for blame, but not in religious
matters.
One result of this visitation was that the college lost
its most able member, John Case, who was admitted
in 1564 and was M.A. in 1572. There was some
scandal between him and a widow named Dobson, and
he married her in 1574 and set up as a private tutor at
no. 2 Magdalen St.; he was made a canon of Salisbury
in 1589, but continued to reside in Oxford. He was
M.D. in 1590. His pupils were either boys preparing
for the University or undergraduates reading for the
B.A. degree; and Case's house was recognized by the
University as on a level with the halls. He wrote
important works on Aristotelian philosophy and was
an authority in medicine and music. He died in 1600,
aged 54, and was the ablest scholar in Oxford during
the reign of Elizabeth.
By the death of the foundress in 1572 the college
became possessed of freehold houses in London worth
200 marks a year; and if the college had retained them
it would now be very rich, but the founder had directed
that they should be sold and the money invested in land
near Oxford. By 1590 the process had been completed,
the houses having been sold for £3,600, and with this
and the other £3,000 the college had acquired the
manor and advowson of Charlbury, the great tithes
and the advowson of Kirtlington, a manor in Draycot
and Southmoor, and in particular the manor of Walton
with the advowson of St. Giles's and its great tithes.
This was bought in 1573 from Richard Owen of Godstow for £1,563; of course, it did not mean the freehold
of all the land in the manor, but the college acquired
perhaps 500 acres and several houses on both sides of
St. Giles's including Black Hall. Nor did it mean the
whole of the great tithes of the parish; for nearly half
the land had not paid tithe to St. Giles's church but to
Oseney or St. Frideswide's. From the first this was a
profitable investment.
When Toby Mathew was made Dean of Christ
Church he resigned the post of President, and in May
1577 Francis Willis, an ex-fellow and married, was
elected with the approval and at the instigation of the
Visitor. He was a good accountant, though not a great
scholar. Unlike his predecessors, he refused to incur
debts, and on one occasion at the risk of unpopularity
he reduced the commons rather than have a deficit in
the annual accounts. The numbers in the college
increased, until at July 1583 the full total was reached
of a President and 50 fellows. All salaries were now
paid at the full rate contemplated by the statutes, and
in a short time new lecturers were added. The rise in
the price of agricultural produce which occurred during
the reign of Elizabeth, while it increased the price of
food, brought a benefit to landed proprietors in an
increase of rents, or at least an increase of fines when
leases were renewed, and this was far more than a
compensation. The steady improvement in the position of the college was due partly to Willis but still
more to the Visitor, Sir William Cordell, Master of
the Rolls. A collection of the letters (fn. 27) that he wrote to
the college between 1567 and his death in 1582 shows
that there has never been a Visitor of any college that
showed such diligence, care, and patience. He wrote
to Willis every two or three weeks, strengthened him
against his opponents in the college, advised him in
financial matters, spurred him when he was indolent,
and placated him when his feelings were hurt. He
deserves to be placed with Laud and Paddy as one of
the great benefactors of the college. In 1587 Willis,
who had been searching for promotion for some time,
was made Dean of Worcester, but remained President
until 1590.
His successor, Ralph Hutchinson, elected June 1590,
was not eminent, but as he was selected in 1604 to be
one of the translators of the New Testament, he must
have been a good scholar. The college was still so
young that the choice of candidates was limited and
Hutchinson, who was only 38, was the oldest fellow
or ex-fellow. Having been Medical Fellow, it had not
been necessary for him to take Holy Orders, but in the
spring of 1586 he resigned his fellowship, married the
daughter of Mrs. Willis by her first husband, and was
ordained. The college was becoming rich in good
scholars from a succession of the best boys in Merchant
Taylors' School, but they were all youthful. In the
volumes, consisting of Latin poems, which were issued
by the University in 1587, 1592, and 1593, St. John's
College contributed more than its due share for so
young a college. (fn. 28)
Hutchinson died in 1606 and for the next 40 years
the college was ruled by men of prominence, John
Buckeridge (1606–11), William Laud (1611–21),
William Juxon (1621–33), Richard Baylie (1633–48
and 1660–7); and no college has played a more
important part in national affairs for so long a time.
At the beginning of the century among the commoners
was Sir William Paddy (1554–1634), physician to the
king, and Griffin Higgs (1589–1659), who by Laud's
advice was made chaplain to Elizabeth, Queen of
Bohemia, and afterwards was Dean of Lichfield;
among the fellows was Mathew Gwyn (until 1605),
famed as a playwright; Michael Boyle (until 1614),
who became Bishop of Waterford; Christopher Wren,
who was made Dean of Windsor in 1635, the father
of Sir Christopher Wren. In the same year Richard
Baylie was made Dean of Salisbury. In the period
1635–41 five of the college were holding the sees of
Canterbury and London and the deaneries of Windsor,
Salisbury, and Lichfield; and in addition Laud was
Chancellor of the University and a leading figure in
the Privy Council, while Juxon was Lord High
Treasurer. In Church and State the college was preeminent.
John Buckeridge, who was elected President in
1606, had come to the college in 1578 as of founder's
kin. The fellows of founder's kin were for the most
part of less ability than the other fellows, as might be
expected, but Buckeridge was an exception. Two
centuries later the able family of Austen, to which Jane
Austen belonged, supplied fellows of founder's kin.
Buckeridge was Canon of Windsor (1606–11), Canon
of Hereford (1604–11), and held other preferment, so
that in 1600 he had been obliged under the statutes to
resign his fellowship. He was Bishop of Rochester in
1611, and subsequently became Bishop of Ely.
He was succeeded by William Laud. When one of
the Reading fellowships became vacant in Nov. 1589,
and information had been sent, as was customary, to
the Mayor of Reading, he nominated William Laud,
son of William Laud, clothier, who was churchwarden
of the church of St. Laurence at Reading in 1587.
Young Laud was already in residence at St. John's as
a commoner, having been matriculated 17 Oct. 1589
aged 16. He was admitted as a fellow 30 June 1590,
and resigned his fellowship 10 Oct. 1610, no doubt in
consequence of promotion, and received, as was then
the custom, a gratuity of £10. Subsequently, when he
became President, he persuaded the college to discontinue this custom, and refunded the £10 he had received.
He was elected President (fn. 29) in May 1611 and held the
office until he was promoted to the bishopric of St.
David's in 1621. In 1663, eighteen years after his
execution, Laud's body was interred in the chapel
between those of Archbishop Juxon and the founder.
Apart from a coffin-plate (now fixed to the wall behind
the sedilia) there is no monument to his memory, but
the college possesses a notable collection of Laudian
relics.
In the period of William Juxon (1621–33) the
Canterbury Buildings were begun at the expense of
Laud. They were completed in 1636 and inaugurated
on 30 Aug., the king and queen and others of the royal
party being entertained in the college with a feast and
a play. (fn. 30) In the year 1635 the college received a liberal
endowment by the will of Sir William Paddy. Having
been a commoner from Michaelmas (fn. 31) 1570 onwards,
and afterwards a great London physician, he ended his
life in the college, where he had a room from about
1606. He died in 1635 and left £3,200 to be invested
to maintain a choir such as was directed by the statutes,
the abolition of which in 1575 had been felt by many (fn. 32)
as a slur upon the college. To the sum left by Paddy
£500 was added, a legacy of Bishop Buckeridge, and
the whole was laid out in the purchase of the township
of Wood Bevington in Warwickshire.
During the period 1611–40 the college acquired
many livings, for the most part by the efforts of Laud.
When the founder died, it possessed only three, Northmoor, Kingston Bagpuize, and Fyfield; but when the
London property was sold and reinvested, the vicarages
of St. Giles in Oxford, Kirtlington, and Charlbury were
obtained in the years 1573, 1578, and 1590. Crick
rectory was given in 1613 by Sir William Craven, a
Merchant Taylor, who was a good friend to the college.
St. Sepulchre's, Holborn, was given in 1632; and in
1635 William Parker, a Merchant Taylor, gave
Bloxwich in Staffordshire. In the same year the patron
of Bardwell rectory with Laud's assistance conveyed
the church to the college. William Sandys, out of
respect for Archbishop Laud, gave the rectory of South
Warnborough in 1636 and Handborough in 1638.
Great Staughton vicarage was given to Laud in 1637
together with the manor, the reversion being to the
college. Cheam rectory was acquired on easy terms
(i.e. £380) in 1638 by the efforts of Laud; and Codford
St. Mary in 1639 and St. Laurence, Reading, in 1640
both by the persuasion of Laud. Other livings acquired
subsequently were Chalfont St. Peter in 1661, Farndon
in 1676, Barfreston in 1678, and Bainton in 1703. In
1706 Dr. Woodroffe bequeathed the advowson of
Winterslow and also the manor, the rents of which
were to be spent on advowsons; from this source the
college bought Winterbourne (Gloucestershire) in
1733. In 1716 Dr. William Brewster left the college
£2,000 for the purchase of advowsons, and in 1725,
when the money had accumulated, the trustees appointed in the will bought the advowsons of Tackley
(for £750), Leckford (for £590), and Aston le Walls
(for £1,169). The trustees explain that at the request
of the college they had spent the money 'on advowsons
of considerable value that the ingenuous men of your
body may be the sooner induced to quit your society'. (fn. 33)
In 1733 Belbroughton was acquired by a legacy of
£1,000 from Dr. Gibbon and a gift of £300 from his
wife. Sutton (Beds.) was purchased (£1,500) in 1743,
Linton (£4,000) in 1827, Cranham (£4,500) in 1830,
Polstead (£5,500) in 1847, and in 1860 the college
granted to the Bishop of Oxford the advowson of St.
Laurence, Reading, in exchange for the rectory of
Lower Hardres in Kent. (fn. 34)
On the outbreak of the Civil War St. John's was
among the most loyal of the colleges, and in July 1642
it lent the king £800 of which £300 was borrowed
on the security of the college plate; six months later
when the king had made Oxford his headquarters and
asked the colleges to lend him their plate, St. John's
sent all they had, computed to be worth about £800,
but the mint returned £300 in coin to enable the college
to repay their loan. (fn. 35) We know little about the college
during the next three years. It was a time of great
poverty as Parliament had forbidden college tenants to
pay their rents; and we read that in Dec. 1645 when
at the audit it was shown that there was a large deficit,
Mr. Dutton of Sherborne (Gloucestershire) lent, and
finally gave, the college £40 'to prevent the threatened
dissolution of the college'. In return he was granted
the use of two rooms 'in the New Quadrangle', (fn. 36) but
this he can have enjoyed for only a few months. Under
the date of 22 Dec. 1655 the register records that the
debt to Cave the brewer which in June 1646 was
£103 9s. was now finally cleared; no doubt there were
similar debts to the baker and the butcher when the
siege came to an end. We may gather that by 1655 the
college was once more solvent.
In 1648 the Parliamentary Commissioners removed
Dr. Baylie, the President, and several of the fellows,
but Baylie and some of the others returned in Aug.
1660. A note drawn up by Dr. Baylie on 20 May
1664 shows that when the intruders withdrew they
left the college with debts amounting to £1,022 12s.,
among them being £158 to the baker, £351 to the
brewers, £206 to the butcher, £169 neglected repairs
of the college buildings, and £90 the caution money
of 'commoners and gentlemen', which had been carried
away; 'by thrift and care' the college had reduced the
debt, and at the audit of 1663 only £291 remained.
This sum was paid by the decision of the college from
Laud's legacy of £500 which reached the college in
1663. (fn. 37)
Dr, Baylie died in 1667. Peter Mews, elected President at the special request of the king, resigned on 3 Oct.
1673, when he was appointed Bishop of Bath and Wells,
and seven days later William Levinz was elected. He
was succeeded by William Delaune, elected 12 March
1698.
After the Restoration, study and discipline were lax,
and for thirty years the register narrates, almost annually, the confessions of scholars and fellows that they
have broken the statutes and will submit to expulsion
if it occurs again. They confess such things as 'insolencies more notorious than that a name can be found
for them', 'striking and beating' a bachelor, being
drunk and breaking open the door of the bursary,
'blows and opprobrious words', 'affronting the Dean',
'profane cursing and swearing', 'falling into the fault
of pernoctation and absence from all prayers for a
week', 'debauchery and grievous crimes', and so forth;
three offenders submit 'to the very favourable punishment of sitting at the Oyster table for a week and confinement to the college for a fortnight'. (fn. 38) After 1690
we have no more entries of this kind.
In the course of the 17th century rents rose and the
college income increased. By the college statutes some
of this increase might be spent on augmenting the
commons (i.e. the dinner and supper), but salaries and
the personal allowances remained at the figures fixed
by the founder. They might not be advanced by decisions of the college, but only if new endowments were
given. Luckily these were forthcoming. In 1639
George Benson, a Merchant Taylor, gave £1,000 to
purchase lands, the proceeds to be divided among the
40 junior fellows, excluding the 10 seniors, who held
salaried posts. (fn. 39) In 1668 Sir Tobias Rustat gave £1,000
to purchase lands, that £50 yearly might be distributed
to 13 of the fellows or scholars who are most indigent. (fn. 40)
In 1663 Juxon left to the college £7,000, to produce
at least £300 a year which was to be distributed equally
to all resident fellows. (fn. 41) In 1710 a rent charge of £20
a year was left by Mrs. Barker of Sonning, to be paid
yearly to 4 fellows or scholars of not more than six
years' standing. By these allowances the scholars and
young fellows had pocket-money, wherewith to buy
books and clothes and to pay for battels, which at this
time were an absolutely necessary addition to commons.
St. John's, like other colleges, found a difficulty in
accommodating unalterable foundation statutes to the
altered circumstances of the 17th century. As has been
explained, the statutes demanded that fellows who did
not reside in Oxford for ten, or at least eight months
in the year should lose their fellowships, and those who
were schoolmasters, chaplains to noblemen, or curates,
looked for some loophole in the statutes by which they
might retain their fellowships, though they were absent
from Oxford. In the years which followed the Restoration this was found at first in the statute which allowed
a fellow to be absent for six months if he was in the
service of a bishop or a high official of state. In some
years the register records six or more letters from
bishops, asking for six months' absence for some fellow,
as they understand 'on credible evidence' that this is
granted on receipt of a bishop's letter. It is evident that
the men were not such as the statute contemplated,
i.e. they were not in the service of the bishop. Towards
the end of the century these letters become few, and
it seems that the college decided to observe the statutes
more strictly. Another device was to make use of the
statute which allowed a fellow to travel abroad for five
years, receiving the emoluments of his fellowship, on
condition that when he returned he would give lectures
in college on the subjects he had studied while abroad.
No one made so much use of this statute as Dr. Sherard,
who had leave to travel for five years on 11 Dec. 1685;
the Visitor having decided that the statutes did not forbid the granting of a second five years, he was permitted
to remain abroad on condition 'that he begin his
journey home by August 1695'. (fn. 42) But on 2 Dec.
1697 he is granted another five years, and later the
Bishop of Lichfield asks that he may have six months
'by a bishop's letter'. Finally in April 1703 the college
declares that his fellowship is void. Dr. Sherard was
studying botany in particular and resided much at
Smyrna. In Dec. 1699 Mr. Conyers had a 'travelling
cause of absence'; in Oct. 1700 Mr. Torriano; in Jan.
1701 Dr. Blechynden; in Dec. 1701 Mr. Charles
Perrot; in Dec. 1702 Mr. Lombard. Thus there were
six at one time who were absent from the college but
retained their fellowships under the statute which
allowed five years' travel. It may be added that the
statute had laid down that not more than two fellows
should enjoy this privilege at once. The college at this
time was choked with fellows in Holy Orders who
would not vacate their fellowships by matrimony, and
were waiting for a wealthy living. It was the same in
other colleges, but at New College and St. John's it
was specially harmful because it blocked the admission
of scholars; in these colleges no scholar could be elected
unless a fellowship was vacated. We gather from the
registers that under William Delaune, elected 12 Mar.
1698, the statutes were enforced more strictly, and the
registers begin to make frequent mention of fellowships declared vacant because of absence.
It was in 1713 that the college sold Gloucester Hall
that it might become the site of Worcester College.
Sir Thomas Cookes, who had thought to turn the hall
into a college, nominated trustees in his will to complete his purpose; but they had doubts if they could
proceed with the plan so long as St. John's College had
property in the hall. Wherefore on 5 Feb., at a special
College Meeting, attended by 9 Doctors, 10 M.A.s,
5 B.A.s, and 3 undergraduates who had completed the
three years of probation, it was agreed unanimously
that the college was willing, with the Visitor's permission, to alienate the hall that it might become a
college. (fn. 43) On 19 June the college decided 'that
Counsell should be advised before they proceeded to
their valuation' of Gloucester Hall, and on 3 July
Mr. Wright, the Recorder, gave his opinion that
although the fee simple belonged to the college, yet
that the hall had so long been used as a place of learning that the college was only 'seized of it in trust' for
the successive principals and students of the Hall, and
that it could not be converted to any other use, nor
could the rent be raised. The same opinion was given
by the Attorney-General ten years later when Exeter
College wished to raise the rent of Hart Hall, and it
had been the verdict in the Court of Common Pleas
in 1694 when Magdalen College desired to obtain
possession of Magdalen Hall. As the rent of Gloucester
Hall was £7, the college decided to sell it for £200 and
a quit-rent of 20s., with the approval of the Visitor and
the permission of the Crown.
William Holmes was elected President in June 1728
and although he became Dean of Exeter in 1742 he
remained President until his death 4 Apr. 1748. He
left to the college, after certain life interests, £200 a
year and two farms, (fn. 44) ordaining that when the money
had accumulated to £2,000, it should 'be employed
in a convenient building for the Fellows'; in 1794 the
plans were passed for the erection of the Holmes Buildings containing rooms for four fellows. William
Derham, elected 14 April 1748, died 17 July 1757.
He has enriched all the college registers with annotations which are legible, accurate, and useful. William
Walker, elected July 1757, resigned in November
on the ground of ill health. Thomas Fry succeeded
(1757–72), followed by Samuel Dennis (1772–95).
In his time more rooms were added to the college on
the north side. In 1742 the college had bought from
Exeter College a large tenement in St. Giles's with a
frontage of 112 feet, adjacent to St. John's on the north
side. This was let to three tenants, of whom one was
named Thomas Wood. The college in 1794 purchased from Wood the remainder of his lease 'that the
house may be converted into college rooms'. They
were known as Wood's Buildings for more than a
century, but have now been destroyed. Under the
same President the garden reached its present shape.
As has been explained, it was originally the north end
of Durham College garden, but on 1 Dec. 1600 a
decree was passed that the four acres in the open field
'lying on the north side of the Grove' should be inclosed
by a wall as an addition to the Grove. (fn. 45) This was
carried out in 1612, when Edward Sprot, formerly a
fellow, left £200 by his will to the college, and an
inscription on the garden wall states that the wall was
built with his money. Thus the college had two walled
gardens; that on the north was the Bachelors' garden,
the other the Masters' garden. The former by 1748
was laid out with 'a mount, a wilderness and wellcontrived arbours'; (fn. 46) the Oxford Guide of 1774 says
that it 'was so contrived as not to satiate the eye'; the
Masters' garden was formal and regular. On 21 Oct.
1776 the college decided that the wall between the
gardens (i.e. the original wall of Durham College)
should be pulled down, (fn. 47) which was accomplished a
few years later. George III declared that his dominions
did not contain another specimen of gardening skill to
match it. (fn. 48)
Dennis was followed by Michael Marlow (1795–1828), and he by Philip Wynter (1828–71). During
his presidency the college received two notable benefactions; in 1843 Dr. Casberd founded four scholarships of £80 each, and in 1854 Dudley Fereday granted
money to found four fellowships, tenable for fourteen
years, preference being given to founder's kin or natives
of Staffordshire. James Bellamy was president from
7 Dec. 1871 to 24 June 1909, when he resigned, only
two months before his death. After Bellamy the Presidents were: Herbert Armitage James, elected 29 July
1909, died 15 Nov. 1931; Frederick William Hall,
elected 18 Dec. 1931, died 11 Oct. 1933; Cyril Norwood, elected 13 Dec. 1933, resigned 26 Dec. 1946;
Austin Lane Poole, elected 14 Feb. 1947.
The Royal Commissions of the last half-century have
altered much in the constitution of the college. All
the regular fellowships have been thrown open by the
statutes of 1881 and scholars do not become fellows
automatically. But some of the best of the old features
remain; there are still seven scholarships reserved to
Bristol, Coventry, Reading, and Tonbridge, and also
fifteen are reserved to Merchant Taylors' School.
Founder's kin no longer have scholarships, but there is
a preference in the Fereday fellowships for those of
founder's kin, and those born in Staffordshire, with the
qualification that they are 'likely to do credit to the
College'. In practice this means that the fellowships
are thrown open, unless the privileged candidates are
men of academic distinction.
The Library.
The library has its share of manuscripts and early printed books. (fn. 49) The chief benefactors
were Laud and Paddy, but three of the clergy of
London, who were friends of the founder, made contributions. Henry Cole, Dean of St. Paul's, who was
deprived in 1559, gave more than 70 volumes; Gabriel
Dunne, once a monk at Buckfast, afterwards a canon of
St. Paul's, by his will of Dec. 1558 gave 38 works; and
in 1564 Thomas Paynel, once a canon of Merton and
from 1545 to 1564 rector of All Hallows, Honey Lane,
left all his books to the college, 70 or 80 in number. (fn. 50)
Mention should also be made of Richard Rawlinson,
a commoner of the college; born in 1690, he must have
come into residence in 1706, as he took his M.A. in
1713; he died in 1755. Although his great collection
of manuscripts was given to the Bodleian, he left some
of his books and coins to St. John's, and also part of his
real estate. In accordance with his wishes, his heart was
placed in a marble urn in the college chapel, with the
inscription Ubi thesaurus, ibi cor.
Pictures.
The portraits belonging to the college
are described by Mrs. Poole in her Catalogue of Oxford
Portraits, vol. iii (O.H.S. 1926). Of the other pictures
the most notable is a flower-piece by Peter Breughel the
Younger, which hangs in the President's Lodgings.
The college possesses a remarkable collection of
medieval and later vestments, (fn. 51) and in the President's
Lodgings there are three tapestries, a Supper at Emmaus
made at Mortlake c. 1625, and two small Flemish
tapestries of c. 1560 depicting Esther before Ahasuerus
and The youthful Moses presented to Pharaoh. (fn. 52)
Plate.
In 1642 the college sacrificed all but its
communion plate to the Royalist cause, and the register
records the surrender of 176 1b. of 'white' and 48 lb. of
'guilt' plate in obedience to Charles I's appeal. (fn. 53) The
earliest of the surviving vessels date from the early 17th
century. They include an unusual silver-gilt chalice
of pre-Reformation type dated 1641 and a pair of
silver-gilt flagons made in 1605. The secular plate
includes a silver-gilt standing cup and cover dated 1671,
a silver ewer and rosewater dish dated 1685, a fine
porringer given by Sir John Pakington in 1689, and
two silver tankards (1676 and 1688). (fn. 54)
Seals.
The original seal of the college was a pointed
oval bearing a figure of St. John the Baptist within the
legend Sigillvm Commvne Collegii Sancti Ioannis
Baptistae In Oxonio. (fn. 55) The seal now in use is an oval
with a similar figure and legend.
Presidents
Alexander Belsyre, 1557–9
William Eley, 1559–60
William Stock, 1560–4
John Robinson, 1564–72
Toby Mathew, 1572–7
Francis Willis, 1577–90
Ralph Hutchinson, 1590–1606
John Buckeridge, 1606–11
William Laud, 1611–21
William Juxon, 1621–33
Richard Baylie, 1633–48
Francis Cheynell, 1648–50
Thankful Owen, 1650–60
Richard Baylie, 1660–7
Peter Mews, 1667–73
William Levinz, 1673–98
William Delaune, 1698–1728
William Holmes, 1728–48
William Derham, 1748–57
William Walker, 1757
Thomas Fry, 1757–72
Samuel Dennis, 1772–95
Michael Marlow, 1795–1828
Philip Wynter, 1828–71
James Bellamy, 1871–1909
Herbert Armitage James, 1909–31
Frederick William Hall, 1931–3
Cyril Norwood, 1933–46
Austin Lane Poole, 1947–
Buildings
The front quadrangle represents
the buildings of St. Bernard's College,
the residence for student monks of
the Cistercian Order, as Gloucester College was for the
Benedictine Order. In 1540 it fell into the hands of
the king, was granted by him to Christ Church in 1546,
and by Christ Church to Sir Thomas White in 1554. (fn. 56)
It was built gradually from 1437 to 1540, as funds
could be obtained, and was not quite complete at the
Dissolution. A survey of it, made probably about May
1546, (fn. 57) says that the east side, which was to be a library
with chambers below, was nearly finished but lacked its
roof; the rest of the quadrangle was complete and outwardly much as it is now. The beginning was made in
March 1437 when Archbishop Chichele obtained the
royal licence to erect notabile mansum collegiale in the
parish of St. Mary Magdalen in Northgate St.; in
Feb. 1438 the building was complete and seisin was
granted to the head of St. Bernard's College; (fn. 58) it may
be added that the Cistercian students had been known
as St. Bernard's College, even when they had no central
buildings and lived scattered in different lodgings. (fn. 59)
It is obvious that a building which was finished in less
than 11 months cannot have been large, and it is
generally agreed that it was at the north-west corner of
the quadrangle, being a hall on the ground floor with
a room above (perhaps an oratory), and an undercroft
(probably a kitchen) which still survives; it was 27 ft.
from north to south, and from east to west either 30 or
41 ft.; the point is uncertain. (fn. 60) A moulded stringcourse which survives on the outer wall, facing the
street, suggests that the original roof was low-pitched,
and that it was raised when, in process of time, the north
side of the quadrangle was built with a higher roof.
As early as 1433 it was reported at the general chapter
at Citeaux that Archbishop Chichele proposed to build
a college at Oxford for Cistercian scholars and four of
the Cistercian abbots in England were commanded to
collect £80 a year from the Cistercian abbeys for the
construction of this college. (fn. 61) It is not likely that the
sum collected was so large, but it seems that the abbeys
contributed something every year, and the building
proceeded slowly. In 1492 the Abbot of Stratford
wrote to the Abbot of Citeaux 'at the college of St.
Bernard at Oxford we continue the building' (continuamus structuram), (fn. 62) and we have mention of building
in 1438, 1456, 1482, 1483, and 1502. (fn. 63) The work
described in 1438 was certainly on the south side of the
quadrangle, and it is thought that the western front
dates from about 1480–90 as the tower resembles the
old tower of Balliol College of c. 1495. (fn. 64) The chapel
was consecrated in 1530, and both it and the building
next to it on the west, which was the kitchen, may have
been under construction from 1500 to 1530.
By means of the Survey of 1546 we are able to
discover some of the alterations in the buildings which
the founder made in 1555 and 1556. On the south
side of the quadrangle he did nothing, and on the west
side the only alteration that we can discover is that a
statue of St. John the Baptist with beard and flowing
hair was set up in the tower on its west side above the
front gate. (fn. 65) In 1915, when the statue was taken
down, it was found that the hair was not of stone but
was an addition of cement, and that the beard, though
it was of stone, was separate from the head, and attached
by lead. The architect who was in charge was of the
opinion that the original figure represented St. Bernard,
clean-shaven and with a tonsure, and that it had been
altered, by the addition of a beard and hair, to serve
for John the Baptist. (fn. 66)
On the east side the founder must have made considerable alterations. The Survey of 1546 says that
though the range was unfinished, it was intended for a
library above with rooms below, and that it had 25
windows on the west side and 12 on the east. The
natural assumption is that there were 6 rooms on the
ground floor, each with 4 windows, and that the library
had 13 windows, all on the west side, an oriel window
(which still survives) being in the centre and 6 windows
on either side. The founder completed the roof of this
range, but altered its purpose. The northern half of it
was to be the residence of the President of the college,
on both floors; and as by the statutes he might be
married, and would need a kitchen of his own, and
certainly had his own servants, probably quite half
that side of the quadrangle was allotted to him. The
other half seems to have consisted of two rooms on the
ground floor, that on the south being a library, and
next to it a bursar's room; (fn. 67) on the floor above was the
'gallery' (superius ambulacrum of the statutes), a sort of
common room for the fellows. These buildings were
so altered by the founder that neither in Bereblock's
picture (fn. 68) nor in Loggan's can we identify the windows
and the rooms of the Survey of 1546. In 1583 we read
that two new stone windows were made in the gallery,
and the library was enlarged, and there are other entries
of the same kind, especially after 1596, which warn
us how difficult it is to discover from the present
buildings what they were like in 1555. The windows
and the positions of the doorways have been frequently
altered. (fn. 69)
On the north side the founder made a radical change.
The building to the west of the chapel, 42 ft. in length,
and consisting of three bays, which had been the kitchen
of St. Bernard's College, was now made the hall, and
no doubt it was the founder who erected the louvre
which is to be seen in Bereblock's drawing of the college;
a central wood fire was customary in dining-halls, but
would have been of no use in a kitchen. A new louvre
was made in 1616, when the hall was enlarged and
wainscoted. The framework of this louvre can still be
seen in the timbers of the roof. (fn. 70) To the west of this
was a passage, 11 ft. wide, which is described in the
Survey of 1546 as an 'entry' leading out of the 'quadrant' northwards. This passage remained untouched,
but was put to a new purpose; for the founder built a
kitchen, outside the college, close to the north end of
this passage, and, as the statutes state, this northern gate
was of necessity kept open during meal-time, as the food
from the kitchen to the hall passed through it; but the
front gate was to be closed. The building to the west
of this, which had formerly been a hall, 30 ft. from east
to west, was now the pantry and the buttery; and the
room above was partitioned into chambers. (fn. 71)
It may be pointed out that the plan of the quadrangle
with the chapel and hall on the north side and the
library on the east with its windows facing west is the
same as Wykeham's plan at New College. In both
cases the entrance was under a tower and the rooms
for the residents each had four small windows and one
large one with a fire-place opposite the large window:
they were intended at New College to hold four
persons, and no doubt the same was the intention at
St. Bernard's College. Though the building was still
unfinished in 1541, it is clear that the plan in its main
outlines dates from 1437.
The founder made two additions to the building
which he acquired from Christ Church. As has been
said, he erected a kitchen outside the north wall of the
college, and Bereblock's drawing shows the difference
between the stonework of the kitchen and that of the
college. The other building was the pigeon-house. Its
position is indicated by the terms of an agreement between St. John's and Trinity College in 1560 concerning the wall to be built between the colleges, (fn. 72) where it
is stated that the wall at its west end would start from
the dove-house, and a tenement next but one to the
college on the south side extended at its east end to 'a
little dove-house appertaining to the College of St.
John's'. (fn. 73) It was therefore on the site of the Holmes
buildings. That it was erected by the founder and not
by the Cistercian monks is shown by the words of a resolution passed by the college in 1599 that the dovehouse should be pulled down as its situation 'was not so
commodious as was hoped for by our good Founder'. (fn. 74)
The bursars' accounts, such as survive for 1568–90,
mention each year the purchase of barley for the pigeons,
and when the finances of the college had improved
there was a salary of '6s. 8d. or a load of wood' for the
keeper of the pigeons, who was generally one of the
younger fellows.

ST. JOHN'S COLLEGE
The North-West Wing of the College
Attics were added to the quadrangle, on the south
and west sides, in 1572 and 1573. We learn from a
college resolution of April 1573 that some of the upper
rooms had lofts over them, evidently made recently,
and it was decided that the same step should be taken
with the other upper rooms. (fn. 75) By this means nine
rooms were added to the college. Each attic had two
dormer windows, but they did not face towards the
quadrangle. It was at this period that many colleges,
e.g. All Souls and New College, were expanding their
accommodation by this inexpensive device. As the
bursars' accounts are wanting for some years after
Michaelmas 1572, we have no knowledge what the
cost was. In 1616 the eight dormers which faced the
street were enlarged and 'stone windows were made
instead of wooden ones'. (fn. 76)
The Canterbury Quadrangle dates from two periods;
in the years 1596–8 the greater part of the south side
was built, and in 1631–6 the other three sides were
erected. As early as 1573 the college had contemplated
a new library, to be built somewhere to the east of
the front quadrangle, (fn. 77) but nothing was done, probably from lack of funds. In the bursars' accounts of
1583 we read that the original library was enlarged, (fn. 78)
and in 1584 that 24 dozen chains were bought to
chain books in the library. (fn. 79) In the autumn of 1595
the college decided to build a new library 'for the
enlarging of roome and lodgings in the College, and for
the better commodity of the said College and students
in the same and in many good respects'; and for this
purpose to obtain possession of the 'great house or
building with appurtenances called the house of the
Fryers, near Gloucester Hall' at that time leased to
Mr. Leech; the house was to be pulled down and the
material used in erecting a library 'with other rooms
and lodgings under the same'. (fn. 80) This house, the
remains of the monastery of the White Friars, must
have stood near the west end of Beaumont St., being
reached through Friars' Entry. It was at first intended
that the library should be a building 'in the Masters'
garden' running north and south, with the south end
resting on, or touching, the wall that separated Trinity
and St. John's; but when the President and fellows of
Trinity raised objections, it was decided that the
library should run east and west, and on 2 Mar.
1596 six foundation stones were laid by the officers of
the college and by Mr. Robert Berkeley, who gave
£100. It was by luck and not by intention that the
building was erected on such a site that it could become
the south side of a second quadrangle; and at first it was
completely detached from the original college buildings.
By the end of 1598 it was finished, being a library
above, with four chambers below. (fn. 81) The cost had been
more than £766, apart from 1,000 loads of stone and
timber from the 'great-house', which the college estimated to be worth more than £200. The Company of
Merchant Taylors had, as usual, come to the aid of the
college by a gift of £100, and individual members of
that company gave more than £200; several legacies
fell to the college about this time, so that the total from
all benefactors was £466; the residue was paid by the
college from the sale of timber. (fn. 82) All colleges, when
they needed funds for a special purpose, could obtain
it by cutting timber on the college manors; but for the
fellows of St. John's it was especially easy, as they
owned so much of Bagley Wood. During the three
following years (1599–1601) there were more building
operations at the west end of the library, which cost the
college £300, but it is uncertain what they were, as
much of it was cleared away less than forty years later
when Laud extended the west end of the library to
form the south side of the new quadrangle. We hear
of 'a convenient cloister and dry walk', which was
made to connect the college with the new library, and
of a 'lodging for some of the students or servants of the
College'. (fn. 83) Part of the site had been occupied by the
pigeon-house which was 'now for want of pigeons unprofitable and otherwise very ruinous'. In Feb. 1599
the college decided to pull it down, and the resolution
said that another would be built in a site 'less noisome
to the students', but this was not done. Loggan shows
a building on this site, perhaps 40 ft. north to south and
50 ft. east to west, and it is probable that this represents
the greater part of what was erected in 1599–1601.
This must have been the 'lodging for the students and
the servants' which was planned in 1599.
During Laud's Presidency (1611–21) there was
much building. In 1612 Thomas Clarke, senior cook
of the college, was granted leave to build a kitchen of
which the college was in need, and above it four chambers which were to be let to commoners, who should
be selected by the President. This was the beginning
of what came to be known as Cook's buildings. Clarke
was to receive the rents of the chambers for twenty
years. (fn. 84) We may compare with this the rooms at
Exeter which were erected by Thomas Bentley, butler
of that college, in 1597; they were for the accommodation of undergraduates of the college, and Bentley was
to receive the rents. In each case a college servant
invested his savings in a way which would benefit him
for life, and subsequently would benefit the college.
In 1616–17 there were repairs and alterations in the
oldest part of the college at the north-west corner,
where the undercroft was strengthened by the insertion
of an additional pier; at the same time the hall was
lengthened 11 ft. by the inclusion of the old passage
which led northward from the quadrangle, and a new
passage was made to the west of it, which in turn was
included in the hall in 1936, when a new passage was
made through what had hitherto been the antechapel.
The total cost was £436, towards which the Merchant
Taylors' Company contributed £100. The accounts
also mention 'Wainscottinge both sydes of the Hall',
the 'makinge of a newe Skreene in the Hall', and of a
new louvre in its roof. (fn. 85) It was at this time that battlements were added to the quadrangle at a cost of £150,
the gift of Mr. Benjamin Henshaw, whose arms are
carved on the south and east sides.
In Aug. 1630 William Laud, then Bishop of London,
contemplated among other 'intentions for charitye' a
range of buildings opposite to the library. The west
end of the new range was to provide a lower and upper
chamber as an addition to the President's Lodging.
The new building and the library were to be battlemented, and a cloister upon pillars, backed by a high
wall, was to join the new wing and the library. John
Lufton, a fellow, was appointed as overseer of the work,
which was first started in July 1631 on the north side
of what was to be the Canterbury Quadrangle. By
March 1632 Laud's original estimate of £1,055 had
already become £3,200, which included £120 for 'the
Peecing out of the Librarie 20 feete Eastward'. This
increase was caused by the provision of a gallery for the
President over a cloister at the west end of the new
quadrangle to balance Laud's original idea of a cloister
at the east end, and a range of buildings over the east
cloister to form an addition to the library. It was this
last extension that necessitated the extra bay to the
original library, from which the buttresses at the east
end were removed. It appears that the first part of the
scheme was completed by 1633. The original masons,
Richard Maude, Hugh Davis, and Robert Smith, were
then discharged and a William Hill was engaged, only
to be dismissed the following year. John Jackson, later
employed on the porch of St. Mary's and at Brasenose,
was then put in control. A London man, he may well
have been selected by Laud personally as a result of the
failure of the local builders. He seems to have been
treated with some consideration as he is always styled
as 'Mr.'. In May 1633 Laud had commissioned Le
Sueur to fashion for £400 two bronze statues of King
Charles and his queen. (fn. 86) To set them off, the elaborate
frontispieces imposed on the east and west walls over
the two cloisters were designed. Although the architect
of these and of the arcades remains unknown, circumstantial evidence suggests Nicholas Stone. He was
responsible for the stone gateways of the Physic Garden and for the porch of St. Mary's. He visited Oxford
at this time, and the two principal carvers at St. John's—Antony Gore (responsible for the sixteen busts representing Religion and the Virtues on the west, and
Science and the Liberal Arts on the east) and Harry
Acres (who worked both the Gothic grotesques and
the classical cartouches)—were his assistants. (fn. 87) There
is, however, no reference to Stone in Lufton's minutely
detailed accounts, and the only payments for drawing
are to a Mr. Browne, who received £5 in Feb. 1632/3
'for his paines in coming downe [from London] &
drawing ye Drafts, & making ye Moulds'. (fn. 88) The tradition that Inigo Jones was the architect is without
foundation. The whole quadrangle was completed by
April 1636 and cost upwards of £5,500. (fn. 89)
The building between the library and the college
(whatever it may have been), dating from 1600, was
removed, producing stone to the value of £14, and the
library block was continued westward to connect with
the college. The passage which led eastward from the
first quadrangle was moved towards the north so that it
might be central with the new quadrangle. The gallery
over the east cloister was meant to be a chamber where
some of the treasures of the college were to be preserved; it was to be kept locked, and at first there were
only two keys. It was not until 1838 that it was fitted
up with bookshelves and the seven original cases were
removed. Three of them are now in the President's
Lodging, one is at Lambeth, and one, formerly at
Bainton, was recovered by the college in 1947.
In 1642 and 1643 there was much alteration to
Cook's building. In 1620 the college had bought
Clarke's interest for £40; and the college accounts for
1620–31 show the receipt of £7 10s. a year from three
chambers in Cook's building, the fourth perhaps being
used by the college for some special purpose; after 1631
the annual accounts are lacking for some years. In
April 1642 there was 'taken out of the Tower and
carried into the Chest in the Bursary, for the building
of some chambers adjoining to the Kitchin, two baggs',
containing £106 13s. 4d., the combined legacies of
Nicholas Lymbie and Henry Price. In the following
year over £550 was spent on 'the raising of the new
chambers by the Kitchin and the new building neere
to the President's Lodging'. The latter, a detached
building shown in Loggan's view, no longer exists: (fn. 90)
but it is clear that Cook's building, as it now stands,
dates from 1642 and 1643. The mason employed was
Jackson, who had finished the Canterbury Quadrangle,
and who later acted as 'overseer' of the new chapel and
library of Brasenose. (fn. 91)
Two Restoration additions are noteworthy. In 1662
Richard Baylie, Laud's executor newly restored to the
Presidency, completed the erection of a mausoleum at
the north-east end of the chapel. It is distinguished by
its fan vaulting with Renaissance cartouches, a remarkable evidence of the conservatism of the local builders.
In 1676 a common room was built, to the northwest of the Baylie Chapel, the master-mason employed
being Bartholomew Peisley. (fn. 92) It is a separate building
with basement and attic, finely wainscoted in oak and
ornamented by a plaster ceiling of considerable merit
and curiosity, the work of Thomas Roberts, a local
plasterer, in 1742. The inner common room was built
soon after 1826, 'according to a Plan exhibited by
Mr. Robinson, Architect'. (fn. 93) The ceiling was designed
by Crace, with a frieze of Latin and Greek mottoes
said to have been suggested by H. L. Mansel. (fn. 94) The
adjoining smoking-room, added in 1900, was remodelled internally to the designs of E. Maufe in 1936.
The hall was considerably altered in the course of the
18th century. The ceiling in its present form dates from
1730, (fn. 95) and in the following year the marble chimneypiece, the gift of John Preston, a fellow, whose arms it
bears, was erected by William Townesend. (fn. 96) The
screen of 1616 was replaced in 1742 by the existing
stone screen, designed by James Gibbs, and built by
John Townesend for £120. (fn. 97) The wainscoting was
introduced in 1744. (fn. 98) It was probably at this time that
the windows were deprived of their transoms and mullions, shown in Williams's Oxonia Depicta of 1732–3. (fn. 99)
No further change took place until 1936, when the
screen was set back in order to increase the accommodation in the hall.
The chapel has undergone many alterations since its
consecration in 1530. It is described in the survey of
1546 as 'a fayre chapele, in length iiiixx fote, in bredeth
xxvii fote within the wallis with iii aullters and vii
wyndowes', those at the sides having three transomed
lights and the east window seven. (fn. 100) It is said to have
been repaired and beautified by Sir Thomas White, but
nothing is known of its internal arrangement before the
17th century. In 1619–20, however, extensive alterations were carried out under Laud's direction, including the erection on the north side of an organ-loft 'built
of stone from ye Ground', with 'a Vestry under it'.
This stood immediately to the west of the present
Baylie Chapel, and is shown in Loggan's view of 1674
as a gabled projection with a plaque of the founder's
arms on its west wall. At the same time £280 was spent
on 'the settinge up of an Organ and guildinge it'; the
position of the screen was altered, the seating was enlarged, and the walls were wainscoted. Stained glass
depicting the story of St. John the Baptist was placed
in the east window, and the communion-table was
furnished with 'cloths of Crimson and purple Vellvett'. (fn. 101)
In 1632 Laud commissioned Adam Brown, the joiner
employed by him at Lambeth, to make a 'skrin to part
the upper end of the Chappell'. (fn. 102) A Cornishman who
visited Oxford in 1639 found work still in progress,
and reported that the chapel was 'partly paved with
checkred worcke of blacke and white Marble, as Most
off the rest are, and to bee painted in imitation of
Magdalin Chappell'. (fn. 103) How much of Laud's work survived the Commonwealth is uncertain, but an extensive
restoration was carried out during the years 1663–78,
for which partial accounts exist. (fn. 104) The windows were
reconstructed with semicircular arches and debased
Gothic tracery, (fn. 105) the walls were again wainscoted, (fn. 106) and
the marble paving was repaired and extended to the
Baylie Chapel. (fn. 107) A new, and according to Wood 'a very
beautiful', screen was erected, perhaps to the designs of
Wren, whose father had been a fellow of St. John's, and
whose elevation for a screen bearing the college arms is
preserved among his drawings at All Souls. (fn. 108) £90 was
paid to 'Mr. Hawkins ye Painter', and £9 15s. was
spent on 'Candle-Sticks for ye Chappell'. A new altarpiece, for which the joiner, William Sells, received
£219, was erected in 1717. (fn. 109) In 1767–9 the Laudian
altar-loft was demolished, and a new organ by Byfield
was placed over the screen at the west end of the chapel. (fn. 110)
Apart from some extensive repairs carried out in 1790–1
by James Pears, (fn. 111) there were no further changes until
1843, when the chapel was entirely remodelled in
Perpendicular Gothic by Edward Blore. (fn. 112) Of the 17thcentury work only the Baylie Chapel and the marble
pavement were allowed to remain (fn. 113) —though the former
was 'thrown open by means of two arches'—and the
chapel as it exists to-day is virtually a Victorian building. The monuments round the walls were taken down
and re-erected elsewhere—the more important in the
Baylie Chapel, the rest on the west wall of the antechapel. (fn. 114) The sedilia on the south side of the sanctuary
were inserted by C. E. Buckeridge, architect, c. 1870. (fn. 115)
Behind them is what the Ecclesiologist for 1845 described as 'a comfortable red-cushioned pue for the
President's lady and family', communicating directly
with the Lodgings. (fn. 116) The present stone reredos, with
figures representing the Baptism of Christ, was designed
by C. E. Kempe in 1892: stained glass by Kempe was
placed in the east window at the same time, replacing
the work of O'Connor (1853). Glass to the memory
of President Wynter, Dean Mansel, and R. C. L. Dear,
fellow and tutor, was placed in three other windows in
1872. In 1949 the Baylie Chapel was provided with an
altar and communion-rails, and Dr. Baylie's monument,
partially dismantled in 1843, was restored to its former
position on the south side. (fn. 117)
The Holmes Buildings, to accommodate four fellows,
were begun in 1794. The builder was James Pears. (fn. 118)
Dr. Holmes had left funds for this purpose in 1748, but
some life interests intervened, and the legacy did not
reach the college at once. But, even so, the delay is
remarkable. Perhaps Loggan's engraving of the college
supplies the answer; for he shows that the site was
occupied by buildings—two stories high, with four
chimneys and many windows, capable of lodging
eight or ten undergraduates. It may be that the
college was unwilling to remove this old building
until other lodgings had been found. It is noteworthy that it was in 1794 that the Wood Buildings
for undergraduates were erected on land to the north
of the college.
It was mainly to increase the accommodation for
undergraduates that the buildings forming the North
Quadrangle were erected from 1880 onwards, replacing the Wood buildings. In 1742 the college had
bought from Exeter College a large property south of
Middleton Hall, and this, with further purchases in
the same area, (fn. 119) made it possible to extend the college
in this direction. The block facing St. Giles' was built
in two parts, the gate-tower and rooms to the south of
it in 1880–1 to the designs of G. G. Scott junior, those
to the north in 1899–1900 (E. P. Warren, architect).
The Rawlinson Building which forms the north side of
the quadrangle was designed by N. W. Harrison and
built in 1909: nine additional sets of rooms were added
at the east end in 1933 (E. Maufe, R.A., architect). The
remainder of the east side of the quadrangle north of the
senior common room is occupied by the old Fellows'
Stables.
In 1948 a new block (fn. 120) containing ten sets of rooms
was built on the vacant area to the south of the front
quadrangle, the intervening space being formed into
a colonnaded court known as the Dolphin Quadrangle
from the Dolphin inn which once occupied part of the
site. (fn. 121) The architect was Edward Maufe, R.A.