SOMERVILLE COLLEGE
General History
The movement for the
higher education of women
at Oxford began with the
creation of a voluntary Association for Promoting the
Higher Education of Women, intended to provide
teaching for the special examinations for women which
the University instituted in 1875 as part of its system of
examinations for persons not members of the University.
This Association, founded in 1878, was to begin work
in October 1879, and at a meeting of 4 June 1878 a
proposal was made to found a hall of residence for the
accommodation of students coming to attend its
lectures. The proposal to found a hall, which had
already been raised independently of the new Association, was taken up by a number of sympathizers, but before the end of the year a disagreement among them on
the question of religious observance made co-operation
impossible. (fn. 1) As a result some of them, led by Dr. John
Percival, President of Trinity College, and Professor
Thomas Hill Green, seceded from the other supporters,
and at a meeting of 7 Feb. 1879 decided to form a
second hall, which should be undenominational in
character. (fn. 2) These seceders founded what is now
Somerville College.
A provisional committee, chosen at this meeting,
submitted to a second meeting on 15 Feb. a draft pro
posal for the organization of the hall, which was passed
with amendments, and at a third meeting on 28 Feb.
a committee of fourteen (later increased to sixteen) (fn. 3) was
elected and Dr. Percival voted to the chair. At the
same meeting the proposed hall was given the name of
Somerville Hall in honour of the mathematician, Mary
Somerville, on the motion of Mrs. Humphrey Ward. (fn. 4)
On 3 May 1879 Miss Madeleine Shaw-Lefevre was
appointed its first Principal.
Both the new halls opened on 13 Oct. 1879. Somerville had 12 students in residence, 8 of whom were
assisted by exhibitions, none of which were in the first
instance promised for more than three years. (fn. 5) But the
demand for the facilities it offered was great, and its
numbers rose steadily. By 1885 it had 30 students in
residence; by 1895, 62; by the outbreak of the war in
1914, 101. In 1926, when the University under a new
statute limited its numbers to 150 undergraduates,
there were 134 on its books. Its maximum was increased
to 160 in 1945 and to 180 in 1948.
This growth is attributable in part to the improved
opportunities for women students offered by the increasingly liberal attitude of the University, but
largely to the greater attractions offered by Somerville
itself as it changed its status from that of a hall of
residence to that of a college. The first rules of the hall
state categorically that it has been formed 'for the reception of students coming from a distance to attend the
lectures of the Oxford Association for Promoting the
Higher Education of Women'. In its only reference
to tuition the Council states that it will 'undertake to
arrange for the instruction in Holy Scripture of those
Students who desire it, and also for private tuition in
other subjects, should this be found necessary in addition to the instruction furnished by the Association'.
By 1893, however, when the Association attempted, to
restate this relationship, (fn. 6) the policy of Somerville was a
flat denial of it. The following year it changed its style
to Somerville College 'in the belief that it would not
only improve the educational status of Somerville in the
eyes of the public, but would be understood as implying
the desire of the Governing Body to raise it above the
level of a Hall of Residence'. (fn. 7)
The change in outlook had begun by an only halfconscious analogy with the colleges of the University. (fn. 8)
In the time of the second Principal, Miss Agnes Maitland, the change became explicit. After a brush with
the Association over the arrangement of the students'
work, (fn. 9) she turned her attention to the appointment of
college tutors to take over as much as possible of the
honours teaching. By 1910, when the University
recognized the presence of women students by the formation of the Delegacy for Women, there was no
longer any doubt that the women's societies were independent academic bodies.
A parallel development had been taking place in the
constitution of the society. The original constitution,
like that of all the women's societies, was the result of
that 19th-century invention, the joint-stock limited
liability company. In 1881 the founders of the hall
formed themselves into a joint-stock company, not intended for profit, under the Company Laws of 1862 and
1867. The Association of Somerville Hall was composed of ordinary members (subscribers of £1 1s. or
more per annum), life members (subscribers of a sum
of £25 or more, or of £5 5s. per annum for five years),
and honorary members. They elected a council of
18 persons, to manage the company's affairs and submit
an annual report to a general meeting.
This method of endowing new institutions had advantages when no rich donor could be found. As a form
of governing anything but charitable institutions, it had,
however, obvious inconveniences, since it depended on
an enthusiasm hard to maintain when the institution
became self-supporting and the foundation members
had disappeared. This difficulty was met by a measure
begun at Girton but followed by all the women's
societies, whereby the joint-stock principle was retained,
though without its original financial justification. This
was the admission of past students of the college to
membership at greatly reduced rates. At Somerville
membership was in 1896 thrown open at a rate of 5s. a
year to all past students who wished to apply and who
possessed certificates issued by the council. The
existence of an interested body of members was thus
assured, but it could not be assured that they formed a
body with much internal cohesion, or in touch with
changing academic requirements. In consequence the
development of the college depended on the policy and
traditions of the elected council, and here, fortunately,
there arose a force which had not been envisaged in the
constitution. As the founders of the society ceased to
direct its affairs, this direction began to fall into the
hands of the Principal and tutors who were carrying on
the work of the college, and were in touch with both
the University and the past students.
They were not originally intended to be members of
the governing body. The first Principal was not a
member of the committee of 1879–81, which preceded
the Association, and, though she was elected to the new
council in 1881, there was no provision for her to sit on
it ex officio. Nevertheless, she had attended committee
meetings since 23 Sept. 1879, and there was never any
of that opposition to her membership which had such
unfortunate effects at Girton. (fn. 10) So far as the tutors
were concerned their position developed more slowly.
They were, in 1894, assured of honorary membership
of the Association, (fn. 11) and it is dear that some of them
early began to play a prominent part in the general
meetings. It was not till 1903 that one of them was, at
their joint request, elected to the council, (fn. 12) and until
1922 there were never more than two tutors on it.
Their absence from its deliberations was imperfectly
offset by increasing consultation of them as a body, but
it was not till 1921 that the Articles of Association were
amended to allow the creation of not less than six or
more than nine official fellows with membership of
council. (fn. 13)
Necessary as the change was, this element of collegiate
organization fitted awkwardly into the framework of a
joint-stock company, and was itself a sign of the need
for a more normal college organization. The occasion
for obtaining it soon came. The new relations between
the University and the Women's Societies, which
followed the admission of women to degrees, made it
desirable that the Women's Societies should be bound
by charters and statutes. A strong committee of council,
considering the terms of the new incorporation, urged
in 1924 that instead of incorporating the whole body of
Somerville members they should incorporate that of the
Principal and Council of Somerville College, by analogy
with 'older academic foundations which have stood
the test of time'. (fn. 14) The council was to consist of the
Principal, the official and professorial fellows of the
college, a nominee of the Hebdomadal Council from
its own members, (fn. 15) six persons chosen by a reorganized
Association of Senior Members, (fn. 16) and six persons
elected by the council. Four life members were appointed by special provision in gratitude for their past
services.
This new body came into being on 7 June 1926,
and the taking over of the chair by the Principal, the
growth of the number of official fellows (now ten),
and the increasing use of devolution to a committee
of the Principal and fellows, has brought the organization still more into line with Oxford traditions.
The constitutional development is probably not yet
complete.
Increase in size and development in constitution has
not been accompanied by a comparable increase in
endowment. Large contributions to the general funds
of the college have been few, the largest being £25,000
granted in 1925 by the Trustees of the Cassel Fund, (fn. 17)
and a sum of more than £13,000 received between
1921 and 1925 as a result of public appeals for the endowment of the Women's Societies. A larger number of
gifts and endowments have been received for special
purposes, but these also are small. In its earlier days the
college was very poor, and during and after the 1914–18
war suffered severely from the rising prices and a burden
of debt for building. The financial skill of the third
Principal, Dame Emily Penrose, helped it to surmount
these difficulties, and moreover a sum of about £48,000
was brought together (largely from the benefactions
mentioned above) for general endowment. Increased
expenditure, the purchase of land adjoining the college
site, and the need to enlarge and improve accommodation has, however, depleted this fund, and it is still true,
as in 1921, that more than 90 per cent, of the general
expenditure must be met by students' fees. (fn. 18)
Buildings
In June 1879 premises temporarily
suitable for a hall of residence were
found in Walton House, a St. John's
property, leased to Captain Mostyn Owen. The remainder of the lease was purchased for £600 and the
buildings were made ready for use at a cost of £700.
The house itself could accommodate only seven of the
twelve students who came up in the following October;
rooms for four more were provided in the two cottages
on the property, and one lived out. It was therefore
necessary at once to consider the provision of further
accommodation on a permanent site. The neighbourhood of St. Giles's was preferred mainly because of its
convenience for the lectures of the A.E.W. then given
in Alfred St. (Pusey St.). Of the various properties
considered within the next two years, none offered
greater possibilities of development than Walton House
itself, if the freehold could be obtained. In 1881 St.
John's consented to sell for £7,000. (fn. 19)
The Walton House property comprised three leaseholds, lots 175, 176, and 177 of the St. Giles's Inclosure
Award of 1832. Lot 175 had been awarded to St.
John's and their tenant Thomas Ensworth, an alderman
of the city of Oxford, who had built the house upon an
inclosed piece of land, included in this allotment,
leased from St. John's in 1826. (fn. 20) The rest of the
property had formed part of the common fields of St.
Giles's parish. (fn. 21) Davis's map of 1797 shows some inclosures bordering the Woodstock Rd., with open
pasture beyond. The Survey of 1772 makes it clear
that there were no houses immediately south of the
infirmary. (fn. 22) Lot 176 was leased by Thomas Ensworth
in 1832 from Lincoln College, who sold the freehold to
St. John's in 1864. Captain Owen acquired both
leaseholds in 1859 and added to them the third, lot 177,
a freehold of St. John's. (fn. 23)
The whole property purchased in 1881 measured
2 acres, 2 roods, 25 perches. It is well shown in the
10 in. Ordnance Survey of 1879. It was bounded on
the west by Walton St., where was the main entrance
and lodge, and on the north by the Radcliffe Infirmary.
A carriage drive led from the house past a coach-house
and two cottages to a gate in St. Giles's Rd. West
(Woodstock Rd.). The rest of the boundary to the east
was formed by freeholds of the vicar of St. Giles's, St.
John's, and the church of St. Aloysius; and to the south
by University College property. (fn. 23) To the east and
south there were possibilities of expansion, but for the
time the original site was sufficient for the needs of the
hall.
The uncertain future of women in Oxford, and the
absence of endowment, made any systematic planning
of the site and buildings impossible. In the first years
two architects were employed to carry out two different
plans for providing residential accommodation. The
first was an adaptation of the original house. In 1881
T. G. Jackson designed a new wing projecting from
the SE. corner. It provided twelve new rooms with a
favourable south aspect, later to be blocked by other
buildings. (fn. 24) In 1985 Walter Lane designed a NE. extension to balance the Jackson wing, and at the same
time considerable changes were made in the structure
of the house; the roof was raised to make five rooms in
the attics and the east frontage was brought forward. (fn. 25)
The same architect built the Woodstock Rd. Gatehouse in 1892, (fn. 26) and the hostel, a small block on the
site of the old coach-house, in 1898. (fn. 27) The latter was
intended as part of a future building to be called the
Eleanor Smith Cottages, but the plan was never completed. Meanwhile the alternative policy of building a
second self-contained hall with its own administration
had also been pursued in imitation of Newnham. The
west building, set at the NW. end of the site and
designed by H. C. Moore, was built in two stages. The
first, in 1886–7, gave accommodation for eighteen
students with their own dining-room and drawingrooms; (fn. 28) the second, which included two sets of tutors'
rooms and a lodge at the Walton St. Gate, was completed in 1895. (fn. 29) A gymnasium projecting from the
NE. corner of West was built in 1890 at the cost of
Miss E. J. Forster. (fn. 30) It was converted into a lectureroom in 1922. (fn. 31)
By the end of the century seventy-six students could
be accommodated within the walls, but there were still
no distinctively collegiate buildings. The purpose and
scale of the buildings of the next period, 1900–14,
reflect the change of status from hall to college; their
completion was made possible by the initiative and
generosity of early generations of old students. Plans
for a library were first discussed in 1899, and an appeal
for funds was launched in commemoration of the coming of age of the college. The building, designed by
Basil Champneys, was completed in 1903 and opened
by John Morley in 1904. (fn. 32) It was set against the north
boundary wall and connected by a short cloister at either
end with the west block and the house. The library itself
was on the first floor above a row of students' rooms and
a loggia. The oak shelving has been gradually extended
to accommodate about 26,000 volumes; a gallery was
added in 1924 in accordance with the original plan. (fn. 33)
Part of the cost of this building was provided from the
Pfeiffer bequest, commemorated in the name Pfeiffer
Library.
A hall large enough to hold the whole college was the
second urgent requirement. Debenture shares at
3½ per cent, were issued in 1911 and were largely
subscribed by members of the college. The fund raised
as a memorial to Miss Maitland was set aside to pay for
the oak panelling, and in 1912 it was possible to begin
the building. (fn. 34) The position chosen for the hall and
block of rooms was south of the house and facing west.
It stood partly on the original site and partly on the east
end of an adjoining freehold presented to the college by
Miss E. J. Forster in 1897. This property was made
up of two strips purchased from University College and
Balliol for £4,000 and £1,400 respectively. The
University College property comprised a number of
cottages in Radcliffe Row, earlier known as Cock's Row,
and extended west to 119 and 119A Walton St.; the
Balliol strip on the farther side of Radcliffe Row was let
as a rope-walk. (fn. 35) Permission to close the right of way
through Radcliffe Row was given by the City council in
1903, in view of the possible use of this site for the
Library. (fn. 36) The cottages were pulled down and the site
laid out as a garden in 1905. (fn. 37) The rope-walk tenant
was not disturbed until 1911, when the Maitland
buildings were decided upon. (fn. 38) The foundations of the
new building presented unexpected difficulty and
expense because of the existence of deep pits filled with
loose gravel and rubble. De Gomme's plan of the fortifications of Oxford in 1644 shows that the outer lines
of defence crossed the Somerville site at this corner. (fn. 39)
It seems probable that the pits formed part of the entrenchments, but this possibility was not explored at the
time. The new building was connected with the Jackson wing by an archway over which a wide staircase
led to the hall. Below the hall were senior common
rooms and kitchens. The Maitland block to the south
accommodated eighteen students and two tutors. The
buildings were designed by Edmund Fisher and were
opened by the Vice-Chancellor, Dr. Heberden, in
1911. (fn. 40)
Since the 1914–18 war the main additions have been
Penrose, the East quadrangle, and the chapel. The
Penrose block, designed by Mr. Harold Rogers, was
built in 1927 at the SW. end of the garden and on the
site of 119 and 119A Walton St. (fn. 41) The East quadrangle,
opened by Lord Halifax, the Visitor, in 1934, was the
fulfilment of a long-planned intention, which is shown
in the gradual absorption of the Woodstock Road
properties between the Gate House and St. Aloysius
Church. The freehold of the three houses, 29, 31, and
33 Woodstock Road, was purchased from the vicar of
St. Giles's in 1920 for £1,300. The lease of no. 29 had
been acquired in 1891 and no. 31 in 1905, and both
houses had been adapted in part for students' use. The
lease of no. 33 could not be obtained until 1930. This
St. Giles property was an old inclosure in 1832. The
three houses, first known as 1, 2, and 3 Dover Terrace,
were built by Captain Owen in 1859. The adjoining
property of the 'Waggon and Horses' was purchased
from St. John's in 1923. (fn. 42) These four houses were
demolished in 1932–3, together with the Gate House
and the two cottages, whose condition was reported to be
unsafe. The architect of the new quadrangle was Mr.
Morley Horder, who had already designed two smaller
additions to the college, a reading-room and fellows'
set, filling the gap between the hall and Maitland, and
a sanatorium adjoining the Penrose building to the
South. (fn. 43) The east building included a council room
in addition to fellows' and undergraduates' rooms. A
reconstruction of the archway leading to the hall, considered to be necessary to complete the plan of the East
quadrangle, was carried out in 1938. (fn. 44) The chapel was
offered to the college in 1932 by an anonymous donor
and was dedicated in 1935. The position chosen for
it was at right angles to Maitland on the site of the
Radcliffe Row and rope-walk properties. The architect was Mr. Courtenay Theobald, who also designed
a case for the organ. (fn. 45) In 1930 the college purchased
the lease and freehold of Bedford House, a private
school for boys, built by the Rev. J. H. Thorogood in
1875, a St. John's property adjoining 119 and 119A
Walton St. The building was taken into use with only
slight alterations as a lecture room. It was enlarged in
1939. (fn. 46)
|
| Date of election | Principals |
| 3 May 1879 | Madeleine Shaw-Lefevre |
| 18 May 1889 | Agnes Maitland |
| 22 Oct. 1906 | Dame Emily Penrose |
| 15 Jan. 1926 | Sara Margery Fry |
| 11 Nov. 1930 | Helen Darbishire |
| 6 Feb. 1945 | Janet Maria Vaughan |