Preface
I am anxious, in a few sentences, to explain the circumstances under which these Memorials have been printed for
the use of the Fraternity.
The expediency of collecting into one volume all the information which in several volumes had, from time to time,
been laid before Parliament, often suggested itself to me, and
upon my accession to the Mastership of the Company, the
Court of Assistants very readily sanctioned an expenditure,
and gave authority for such a work.
During the investigation incident to its execution, I had
frequent occasion to examine into the old Records of the
Fraternity, and in doing so I came to the conclusion that
some of these would, if printed, be a valuable contribution to
civic if not to general history. Hence, therefore, I selected
such as would in my judgment be read with interest by the
Members of the Company.
These alone did not, however, appear to be all that was
needed to make the work complete. It was essential that
many facts, to be gleaned from other sources of information,
should be compiled or brought together under such headings
as I have adopted in these pages. Accordingly, I devoted
such leisure as was available to me in prosecuting this undertaking, of which the present volume is the result.
It has been a self-imposed labour, which was entered upon
without any anticipation that the materials would be so
abundant as they have proved to be; and if in the progress
of the work I have felt regret, it has arisen from the wish
that an Author rather than an Editor had engaged himself in
the task, and that his knowledge had enabled him to blend
the History of Guilds with that of the City, in which they
have occupied so conspicuous a part for many centuries.
The Government of London, under its Chief Magistrate,
was developed in a two-fold aspect,—territorial in regard to
commorancy and personal in regard to art or employment.
The first was the Ward, presided over by the Alderman, the
other the Guild, presided over by the Master. Each of these
subordinate authorities owed his allegiance to the Chief
Magistrate; they were members of a larger corporation of
which he was the Head, and the latter swore before him to
govern "the art or mysterie" for his year of office according
"to the rules and ordinances approved here," (fn. 1) —that is in the
supreme Civic Court. As, therefore, every citizen, as a security
to society, had to enter into frank-pledge for his good behaviour
as a resident, so had he to enter a Guild for his honesty and
competency as a trader or craftsman.
The ambition of these Guilds, aided by the wise policy of
the Crown to increase its own influence over the citizens, led
in time to their incorporation under Royal Charter. Yet, in
these instances, it will be noticed that care was taken not to
destroy the authority of the Lord Mayor, but in subordination
to the higher sanction of the Crown to preserve his controlling
power, by giving him a veto upon the rules and ordinances
made and upon the judgments pronounced by the Master for
the government of the Mysterie.
Starting with the impetus of a defined constitutional
existence the City Guilds gradually increased both in number
and in importance. Each member thereof individually, though
it may be imperceptibly, realised the truth of Lord Bacon's
aphorism, "that if the force of custom, simple and separate,
be great, the force of custom, copulate and conjoined, is
far greater, for there example teacheth, company comforteth,
emulation quickeneth, glory raiseth"; so that in these associations, and by their influence, the industrious and honest craftsman passed through the gradations of employer, trader,
merchant, Sheriff and Lord Mayor, until these Guilds, as seed
plots for fame, reared men like Whittington and Gresham, who,
by their commercial adventure throughout the world, spread
the renown of London and upheld the character of its citizens
for integrity and benevolence.
But these were results slowly attained, and the Guild is to
be traced through many stages of development. Taking our
own as an illustration of others, we may notice that it came
into existence adopting as its emblem the highest type of
humanity, "St. John the Baptist." No text or precept of divine
truth is to be found anywhere scattered throughout its records,
but this great ideal was ever before the Guild, for the incidents
of the Prophet's life and death were pictured on the surrounding
walls of their place of assembly, and were woven upon their
vestments and burial clothes.
Adopting Religion therefore as the basis of Union, the
Guild was constituted upon the principle of a common
sympathy between capital and labour, between the master and
the artificer, for while the Master and Wardens, as representative men, governed the Craft or Mysterie, they exercised
their authority under the solemn sanction of an oath to act
"without favour or partiality" to either of the litigants
before them, the capitalist on the one side and the workman on the other. The Court so constituted was one of conciliation, and in that aspect supplied a want which a later
civilization has hitherto sought for in vain.
It was not, however, only in regard to the prosperity of its
Members that the Guild supplied an existing want. At that,
as at other times, men fell into decay or adversity. Against
this evil, when no Poor Law existed, a Provident fund or
Benefit society was established, supported by the stipulated
contributions of all the members paid into the Common Box,
or Treasury, of the Fraternity. No doubt it was a taxation of
the rich for the benefit of the poor, but it savoured of benevolence
when the more prosperous men of the Craft provided almshouses when alive, and left a larger provision at death, for
their poorer Brethren than their own quarterly payments
could supply.
As to the discipline of the Guild, in those days the best
security for good conduct was deemed to be attendance at the
public services of the Church. Hence, at the Cathedral of St.
Paul, and at their own Chapel at the Hall, the members of
the Fraternity were summoned to worship upon anniversary
occasions—as the day of their foundation, and on other days
when death severed the connection of some Brother with the
Guild, and they were attendant upon his funeral.
If, indeed, sterner measures were needed to protect society
from any dishonesty in the members of the Mysterie, the powers
of fine and imprisonment—which the Court of the Master and
Wardens possessed—were freely exercised against the offenders.
No one guilty of such practices would be permitted to
trade, for as no shop could be opened without license, none
could be obtained unless others of the Mysterie vouched for his
integrity. By these methods trade was governed, and first
becoming honest, in time it became honourable.
Viewed in its social and political aspect, the Guild was, if
possible, of higher importance. At the time when the Sovereign
ruled from, and resided in, the Tower of London,—when the
houses of the nobles were scattered on the banks of the Thames
and in ways or streets of the City—trade being a despised occupation—it was of no mean importance that a Taylor, then (though
not now) an insignificant social atom, should, by association,
be able to hail from such a place as Merchant Taylors' Hall,
and if oppressed by noble or by stranger, invoke the aid of a
Company which, soon after its establishment, had managed
to enrol within its membership the Sovereign, and others of no
mean rank in the kingdom.
Nor was this only a nominal advantage. In a City
". . . . where Civic Independence flings
The gauntlet down to Senates, Courts and Kings,"
the custom of early times was to summon all the Members
of the Guild, at least four times in each year, to a common
banquet; and though a distinction of rank and table no doubt
was recognised, yet the fact remained that high and low, rich
and poor, did assemble together, sharing not only the name but
(in matters common to them) the sympathy of a Brotherhood.
The growth of wealth and independence, fostered by these
institutions, gave the middle class political importance. If the
nobles could serve the crown in elective office with hereditary
wealth, the citizens, by common contributions, raised their Civic
Monarch and Sheriffs to something more than an equality of
splendour. The yearly pageant in which they were proclaimed
the supreme Governors for the civic year, brought into prominence many a man who by honest industry had reached this
supremacy, while the experience gained in municipal government qualified them, as their example stimulated others, to
serve the public interests of their fellow citizens in the wider
arena of Parliament.
No doubt these Guilds have discharged their primary duty of
protecting and fostering trade until trade no longer needs any
such protection; but corporate as well as individual life has
other purposes for its existence. As wealth increased, so did
benevolence, and the founders of many Charities have selected
as their future Almoners the Master and Wardens of the
Fraternity. For centuries these trusts which the piety of their
predecessors so confided to them have been fulfilled, while out
of other funds strictly applicable thereto a liberal hospitality
has been exercised in the City, where social absenteeism
would otherwise prevail.
In the case of our own Fraternity, neither these nor other
obligations have been ignored. As early as the year 1513 the
necessity for education was recognised and provided for at
Wolverhampton by a distinguished Member of the Guild, while
in later years, at Bedford and elsewhere, Schools, and at
Oxford (Sir Thomas White's and Lord Craven's) Scholarships,
were founded by other Members. So again, after the Reformation had secularised the objects and increased the revenues of
these Guilds, the men who then governed our affairs realised
the noble purpose of establishing a School in the City, which
opened wide its portals to those whose lot in life it was to toil
within the walls. And that the present generation are not
wholly unmindful of the traditions of the past, or unwilling to
develop into greater usefulness the heritage that has descended
to them, is evidenced in some degree by the new School that
is being reared at the Charterhouse, and shortly to be opened
by an Illustrious Prince, a member of our Guild.
Nor is it only in corporate action that the members of the
Fraternity manifest benevolence, for in the present year "A
loving Brother of the Mysterie" has given a sum of money, not
inconsiderable in amount, to promote the spiritual welfare of
the inmates of our Convalescent Home, while their material
comforts are attended to by others of the Mysterie with a
liberality of labour and sympathy which is its own reward.
Such are some of the benefits arising from Trade Guilds,
and surely in the retrospect of European history for the period of
six centuries their position is unique. All that the Crown ever
conceded to the members of our Fraternity was the right of
free assembly for the purposes of self-government, the liberty
to hold in an honest manner their feast of meat and drink on
St. John Baptist's Day, and to acquire real estate; and yet
out of these elements what a fabric of social order have
the citizens raised! How few institutions are now existent
as they originated, for—during the period under notice—
have not Kingdoms been annihilated, Thrones destroyed,
Dynasties changed, and the elements of Religious strife let
loose in Europe? And yet in each of these trials—so far as
they have fallen upon England—the Fraternity of St. John
Baptist has been found acting in dutiful allegiance to the
rulers of Church and State. Surely no one can examine these
Memorials and not be struck with the continuity of government and authority, which is wholly without a parallel in any
other than the Civic Throne; while no better evidence can be
furnished—unless the Corporation of London be such—that the
citizens are averse to change, and cherish, with something akin
to reverence, their early institutions.
I have in conclusion only to add that the assistance I have
received from others has always been acknowledged in the
text or in a footnote, and the reader will see that it has been
considerable. In the Appendix much valuable information will
be found which has been contributed by Mr. Martin, of the
Public Record Office, by Major Newsome, R.E., a Warden of
the Company, and by Mr. N. Stephens, for many years connected with it.
With his usual liberality, Mr. Gardner, on hearing of my
undertaking, placed his valuable collection of prints and
sketches connected with the City at my disposal, and some
illustrations have been taken from it.
The work has required, and received, great care in printing,
and Mr. Bullock (of Messrs. Harrison's establishment), to
whom it was entrusted, has spared neither labour nor time
in securing accuracy.
C. M. C.
47, Phillimore Gardens,
Campden Hill, W.
List of illustrations
|
| The Hall | To Face page 1 |
| Aggas's Plan of Property adjacent to Threadneedle Street | " 29 |
| Plan of Hall Premises by Mr. I'Anson | " 31 |
| Crypt under the Hall Premises | " 35 |
| Interior of the Hall | " 39 |
| Church of St. Martin's, 1873 | " 46 |
| The Bird's-eye View by Goodmans | " 48 |
| Title Page to Account Book | " 64 |
| Exemplification of First Grant of Arms | " 97 |
| Exemplification of Second Grant of Arms | " 99 |
| Mace and Yard, 1596–7 | " 114 |
| Burial Cloth, circa 1490–1512 | " 135 |
| Burial Cloth, circa 1520–1530 | " 136 |
| Ground Plan of St. Helen's Church | " 344 |
| Almshouses on Tower Hill | " 365 |
| An Inmate of the same in 1710 | " 368 |
| School in Suffolk Lane (front) | " 401 |
| School in Suffolk Lane (back) | " 410 |
| Plan of Charterhouse Estate | " 413 |
| School in Charterhouse | " 415 |
| Diagram of Work | " 455 |
| Portrait of Sir Thomas White | " 456 |
| School at Great Crosby | " 492 |
| Plan of the Fire in 1765 | " 585 |
| Block Plans (5 in number) of Rooms in the New School in
the Charterhouse | " 691 |